Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 401
Filter
1.
Multimedia | Multimedia Resources | ID: multimedia-13169

ABSTRACT

Los diálogos de saberes, también llamados diálogos interculturales, son procesos de comunicación e intercambio entre personas, grupos o comunidades que provienen de diferentes orígenes o culturas. En el caso del sector de la salud, los intercambios se realizan entre determinados grupos o personas y personal de salud capacitado. Su objetivo es, entre otros, mejorar el acceso a los servicios de salud y construir una salud intercultural, con énfasis en la resolución de problemas previamente planteados y sus causas, la comprensión mutua y la creación de vínculos sólidos. Este brochure describe de manera general el proceso que tienen los diálogos de saberes.


Subject(s)
Cultural Competency/education , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Health Information Exchange/standards , Culturally Competent Care/ethnology
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(10): e031695, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We examined the association of multilevel social determinants of health with incident apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from 2774 White and 2257 Black US adults from the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study taking antihypertensive medication without aTRH at baseline to estimate the association of social determinants of health with incident aTRH. Selection of social determinants of health was guided by the Healthy People 2030 domains of education, economic stability, social context, neighborhood environment, and health care access. Blood pressure (BP) was measured during study visits, and antihypertensive medication classes were identified through a pill bottle review. Incident aTRH was defined as (1) systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, or systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg for those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease while taking ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication or (2) taking ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication regardless of BP level, at the follow-up visit. Over a median 9.5 years of follow-up, 15.9% of White and 24.0% of Black adults developed aTRH. A percent of the excess aTRH risk among Black versus White adults was mediated by low education (14.2%), low income (16.0%), not seeing a friend or relative in the past month (8.1%), not having someone to care for them if ill or disabled (7.6%), lack of health insurance (10.6%), living in a disadvantaged neighborhood (18.0%), and living in states with poor public health infrastructure (6.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Part of the association between race and incident aTRH risk was mediated by social determinants of health.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Black or African American , Hypertension , Social Determinants of Health , White People , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Male , United States/epidemiology , Female , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/ethnology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Incidence , Risk Factors , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Drug Resistance , Health Status Disparities , Educational Status , Health Services Accessibility
3.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(17): 1702-1712, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658109

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease affects 37% of Hispanic women and is the leading cause of death among Hispanic women in the United States. Hispanic women have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors, are disproportionally affected by social determinants of health, and face additional barriers related to immigration, such as discrimination, language proficiency, and acculturation. Despite this, Hispanic women show lower rates of cardiovascular disease and mortality compared with non-Hispanic White women. However, this "Hispanic paradox" is challenged by recent studies that account for the diversity in culture, race, genetic background, country of origin, and social determinants of health within Hispanic subpopulations. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the cardiovascular risk factors in Hispanic women, emphasizing the role of social determinants, and proposes a multipronged approach for equitable care.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Female , United States/epidemiology , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Risk Factors , Women's Health/ethnology
4.
Health Expect ; 27(3): e14055, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are disproportionately impacted by socioeconomic deprivation and are at increased risk of developing other long-term conditions (LTCs). These illnesses require transformative action to tackle the adverse effects on their health. Data on lived experiences of LTCs among people living with HIV of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicities are sparse, and how people with LTCs are impacted by social determinants of health (SDoH). METHODS: Through a phenomenological study design this qualitative study, conducted in 2022, comprised four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 20 people of Black ethnicities living with HIV were purposively invited from a community organisation (CO) in London, including four semistructured interviews with CO staff. Following transcription, qualitative data were analysed thematically and measures to validate the findings were implemented. RESULTS: The findings are presented in terms of the following four levels of SDoH: (1) individual determinants (such as the impact of SDoH on lifestyle modification and self-management); (2) interpersonal determinants (such as positive experiences of accessing healthcare for LTCs); (3) clinical determinants (such as care pathway barriers) and (4) systemic determinants (such as systemic barriers related to race/ethnicity). CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to provide ongoing and interactive education to community members who live with HIV, focusing on risks and management of LTCs. Additionally, individuals would benefit from support to navigate increasingly complex and fragmented health services. Health Service staff require cultural competence when caring for patients of Black African and Black Caribbean ethnicities with complex health and psychosocial needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research team collaborated with an HIV CO in South London from the very start of the project to agree the study design and learn about the realities of their daily lived experiences. Community collaborators helped to develop the semistructured interview and FGD topic guides, and were directly involved in the data gathering, analysis and validation.


Subject(s)
Black People , Focus Groups , HIV Infections , Qualitative Research , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , HIV Infections/ethnology , HIV Infections/psychology , London , Male , Female , Black People/psychology , Middle Aged , Adult , Caribbean Region/ethnology , Chronic Disease/ethnology , Health Services Accessibility
6.
Women Health ; 64(4): 350-364, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616625

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) disparities among Black American women can be linked directly to social determinants of health (SDOH). This scoping review examines the breadth and depth of existing literature on CVD risk reduction interventions in young-to-middle-aged women that address SDOH. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Google Scholar for relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English. We included studies if they reported on the feasibility, acceptability, or findings of a CVD risk reduction intervention, addressed at least one SDOH domain, and included Black women 18-45 years of age. Of the 2,533 studies screened, 5 studies were eligible for inclusion. Specific SDOH domains addressed included: social and community context and health-care access and quality. All but one study reported culturally tailored intervention components. Feasibility and acceptability of culturally tailored interventions was high among included studies examining this outcome. Recommendations for future research focused on the need for additional interventions that were culturally tailored to young- and middle-aged Black women. Future research should work to address existing evidence gaps via development and implementation of culturally tailored, CVD risk reduction and disease prevention interventions for young-to-middle-aged Black women that focus addressing SDOH, as these types of interventions demonstrate promise for reducing CVD health disparities among Black women.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Cardiovascular Diseases , Health Status Disparities , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Female , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Risk Reduction Behavior
7.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1475-1480, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551594

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Rates of appropriate surgical treatment of colon cancer are historically worse in traditionally marginalized populations. We sought to examine which social determinants of health may be associated with longer time to appropriate operative intervention. METHODS: The National Cancer Databank was queried for this retrospective study. Adult patients (18 to 90 years of age) diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 with single or primary, stage III colon cancer were included. Patient demographic variables included age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic), comorbidity score, median household income, education status, rural/urban status, treatment facility type and location, and insurance status. Disease characteristics include stage (stage 3), primary site, surgical margins, tumor size, and number of nodes resected. Reported descriptive statistics include means and 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables and frequency and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 134,601 individuals diagnosed with stage 3 colon cancer were included. Time to surgery in all cases had a mean of 26.4 ± 19.0 days. Multivariate analysis of time to surgery indicated that receiving surgery at a Community Cancer Program, Charlson-Deyo Score of 0, younger age, and non-Hispanic-White race/ethnicity are associated with decreased time to surgery (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who receive surgery at a Community Cancer Program, have fewer comorbidities, have lower household income, are younger, and receive surgery within 50 miles of their primary residence are more likely to have timely surgery.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Social Determinants of Health , Time-to-Treatment , Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/ethnology , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , United States , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Neoplasm Staging , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data
8.
Aust J Rural Health ; 32(2): 275-285, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366719

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Commercial tobacco use was systematically embedded as a valuable commodity through colonisation that continues to be exploited for profit by the Tobacco Industry. There have been significant declines in current smoking prevalence among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples 18 years and over, from 55% in 1994 to 43% in 2018-2019. This paper seeks to better understand smoke-free behaviours, and to systematically quantify associations between a range of SDOH and non-smoking/never-smoking among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults (≥18) living in regional Australia. OBJECTIVE: To explore the social determinants of health (SDOH) related to non- and never-smoking among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in regional Australia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the NATSIHS, weighted to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adult population living in regional Australia, was conducted. Participants were characterised as people who were current smokers, never-smokers and non-smokers (ex- and never-smokers). The social determinants of health exposures related to socioeconomic position, well-being and access to healthcare. SETTING: Regional Australia is distinct from urban and remote areas, based on the ASGS Remoteness Structure (ABS) 2018-2019. PARTICIPANTS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults (≥18 years) who were selected, consented and asked questions about smoking in the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (NATSIHS 2018/19). RESULTS: High income was associated with non-smoking (Prevalence Ratio [PR] = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.66-2.57) and never-smoking (PR = 2.02; 1.46-2.79), as was completing year 10 (non-smoking PR = 1.34; 1.12-1.61 and never-smoking PR = 1.56; 1.20-2.03). Better food security was associated with a higher prevalence of never-smoking (PR = 2.42; 1.48-3.98). Lower psychological distress scores were associated with non-smoking (PR = 1.30; 1.10-1.53) and never-smoking (PR = 1.56; 1.21-2.01). Never-smoking was more frequent in participants reporting no experiences of unfair treatment (PR = 1.59; 1.22-2.06). Having a usual healthcare provider was associated with non-smoking (PR = 1.38; 1.02-1.86). Positive exposure to the SDOH were associated with non- and never-smoking among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in regional Australia. Structural and systemic changes to address the SDOH, including discrimination and racism, are expected to accelerate non-smoking behaviours and improve health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.


Subject(s)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Adult , Male , Female , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Australia/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/ethnology , Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Prevalence , Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples
9.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 83: 92-96, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417768

ABSTRACT

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), heavily influenced by physical activity (PA), represents a strong and independent risk factor for a wide range of health conditions, most notably, cardiovascular disease. Substantial disparities in CRF have been identified between white and non-white populations. These disparities may partly account for group differences in susceptibility to poor health outcomes, including non-communicable disease. Race and ethnic differences in CRF may partly be explained by social injustices rooted in persistent structural and systemic racism. These forces contribute to environments that are unsupportive for opportunities to achieve optimal CRF levels. This review aims to examine, through the lens of social justice, the inequities in key social ecological factors, including socioeconomic status, the built environment, and structural racism, that underly the systemic differences in CRF and PA in vulnerable communities. Further, this review highlights current public health initiatives, as well as opportunities in future research, to address inequities and enhance CRF through the promotion of regular PA.


Subject(s)
Cardiorespiratory Fitness , Exercise , Health Status Disparities , Social Determinants of Health , Social Justice , Humans , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Risk Assessment , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Systemic Racism , Race Factors , Risk Factors , Built Environment , Social Class
10.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 43(2): 172-180, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315921

ABSTRACT

This article examines racial and ethnic disparities in the relationship between gentrification and exposure to contextual determinants of health. In our study, we focused on changes in selected contextual determinants of health (health care access, social deprivation, air pollution, and walkability) and life expectancy during the period 2006-21 among residents of gentrifying census tracts in six large US cities that have experienced different gentrification patterns and have different levels of segregation: Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles, California; New York, New York; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Francisco, California; and Seattle, Washington. We found that gentrification was associated with overall improvements in the likelihood of living in Medically Underserved Areas across racial and ethnic groups, but it was also associated with increased social deprivation and reduced life expectancy among Black people, Hispanic people, and people of another or undetermined race or ethnicity. In contrast, we found that gentrification was related to better (or unchanged) contextual determinants of health for Asian people and White people. Our findings can inform policies that target communities identified to be particularly at risk for worsening contextual determinants of health as a result of gentrification.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Health Inequities , Residential Segregation , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Philadelphia/epidemiology , White/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Life Expectancy/ethnology , Life Expectancy/trends , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/ethnology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data
12.
Gerontologist ; 64(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the vulnerabilities stemming from the intersection of aging and migration are widely recognized, the migration contexts and the factors influencing the mental health of older unforced migrants have received scant attention. This review explores the drivers of unforced migrations in later life and the individual, relational, and structural factors influencing their mental health and well-being. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of 7 databases for English peer-reviewed journal articles was conducted. A total of 21 studies were identified and analyzed inductively. RESULTS: The review classified motivations for migration as push factors and pull factors: push factors such as escaping structural inequities in the homeland and pull factors included seeking better lifestyle opportunities and reuniting with family. The positive determinants of mental health included cordial family relationships, paid employment, the presence of a partner, and strong support networks. Advanced age, absence of a partner, lifestyle changes, lack of intergenerational support, poor language proficiency, unfavorable policies, lack of access to resources, and systemic biases negatively affected the mental health of older unforced migrants. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The review highlights the need to recognize the diversity among older migrants to develop policies and programs that address their specific circumstances. Recognizing their strengths, rather than focusing solely on their vulnerabilities will help create a more positive and supportive environment, enabling them to thrive in their new communities.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Social Determinants of Health , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Aged , Aging/psychology
13.
JAMA ; 331(2): 124-131, 2024 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38193961

ABSTRACT

Importance: The End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices (ETC) model randomly selected 30% of US dialysis facilities to receive financial incentives based on their use of home dialysis, kidney transplant waitlisting, or transplant receipt. Facilities that disproportionately serve populations with high social risk have a lower use of home dialysis and kidney transplant raising concerns that these sites may fare poorly in the payment model. Objective: To examine first-year ETC model performance scores and financial penalties across dialysis facilities, stratified by their incident patients' social risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of 2191 US dialysis facilities that participated in the ETC model from January 1 through December 31, 2021. Exposure: Composition of incident patient population, characterized by the proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, living in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood, uninsured, or covered by Medicaid at dialysis initiation. A facility-level composite social risk score assessed whether each facility was in the highest quintile of having 0, 1, or at least 2 of these characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of home dialysis, waitlisting, or transplant; model performance score; and financial penalization. Results: Using data from 125 984 incident patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 54-74]; 41.8% female; 28.6% Black; 11.7% Hispanic), 1071 dialysis facilities (48.9%) had no social risk features, and 491 (22.4%) had 2 or more. In the first year of the ETC model, compared with those with no social risk features, dialysis facilities with 2 or more had lower mean performance scores (3.4 vs 3.6, P = .002) and lower use of home dialysis (14.1% vs 16.0%, P < .001). These facilities had higher receipt of financial penalties (18.5% vs 11.5%, P < .001), more frequently had the highest payment cut of 5% (2.4% vs 0.7%; P = .003), and were less likely to achieve the highest bonus of 4% (0% vs 2.7%; P < .001). Compared with all other facilities, those in the highest quintile of treating uninsured patients or those covered by Medicaid experienced more financial penalties (17.4% vs 12.9%, P = .01) as did those in the highest quintile in the proportion of patients who were Black (18.5% vs 12.6%, P = .001). Conclusions: In the first year of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' ETC model, dialysis facilities serving higher proportions of patients with social risk features had lower performance scores and experienced markedly higher receipt of financial penalties.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Reimbursement, Incentive , Renal Dialysis , Self Care , Social Determinants of Health , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/ethnology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Models, Economic , Reimbursement, Incentive/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis/economics , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Waiting Lists , Self Care/economics , Self Care/methods , Self Care/statistics & numerical data
14.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol ; 53(1): 10-23, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A disproportionate number of COVID-19 cases and deaths have been reported among Latinxs in the U.S. Among those most affected by the pandemic are marginalized families, including those that are undocumented and mixed-status, in which some, but not all members are undocumented. Undocumented and mixed-status families face multiple and chronic daily stressors that compromised their health and wellbeing. Salient stressors faced by undocumented Latinx families include poverty, social disadvantage, discrimination, dangerous living and working conditions, and limited access to healthcare. These stressors are frequently compounded with trauma, fear of detention, deportation, and family separation. PURPOSE: Informed by the literature and insights from our community-based work to address the health needs of undocumented and mixed status Latinx families during the pandemic, this paper uses a social determinants of health lens to present a narrative summary that highlights four primary psychosocial stressors faced by these families and their implications for mental health. DISCUSSION: These include stressors pertaining to (a) anti-immigrant rhetoric and actions; (b) family stressors and disruptions in family dynamics; (c) economic changes and financial losses; and (c) limited access to healthcare. Implications of the aforesaid stressors on the mental health of undocumented families and youth are also discussed. In addition, recommendations are provided for the provision of mental health services, best practices, and resources from a strengths-based approach.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Hispanic or Latino , Social Determinants of Health , Stress, Psychological , Undocumented Immigrants , Adolescent , Humans , Emigrants and Immigrants , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Pandemics , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology
15.
Am J Epidemiol ; 193(2): 277-284, 2024 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37771041

ABSTRACT

Black women in the United States have the highest incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and are disproportionately burdened by its adverse sequalae, compared with women of all racial and ethnic groups. Segregation, a key driver of structural racism for Black families, can provide information critical to understanding these disparities. We examined the association between racial and economic segregation at 2 points and incident HDP using intergenerationally linked birth records of 45,204 Black California-born primiparous mothers (born 1982-1997) and their infants (born 1997-2011), with HDP ascertained from hospital discharge records. Women's early childhood and adulthood neighborhoods were categorized as deprived, mixed, or privileged based on the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (a measure of concentrated racial and economic segregation), yielding 9 life-course trajectories. Women living in deprived neighborhoods at both time points experienced the highest odds of HDP (from mixed effect logistic regression, unadjusted odds ratio = 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.40) compared with women living in privileged neighborhoods at both time points. All trajectories involving residence in a deprived neighborhood in early childhood or adulthood were associated with increased odds of HDP, whereas mixed-privileged and privileged-mixed trajectories were not. Future studies should assess the causal nature of these associations.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Neighborhood Characteristics , Social Determinants of Health , Social Segregation , Socioeconomic Disparities in Health , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , California/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/economics , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/ethnology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Life Change Events , Residence Characteristics , United States , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data
16.
Matern Child Health J ; 28(1): 125-134, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37955840

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) pregnant people face barriers to health and healthcare that put them at risk of pregnancy complications. Rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among Indigenous pregnant people are estimated to be twice that of non-Hispanic White (NHW) pregnant people. METHODS: Race-corrected Oregon Hospital Discharge and Washington Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System data were combined to create a joint dataset of births between 2012 and 2016. The analytic sample was composed of 12,535 AI/AN records and 313,046 NHW records. A multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between community-level, individual and pregnancy risk factors on SMM for AI/AN pregnant people. RESULTS: At the community level, AI/AN pregnant people were more likely than NHW to live in mostly or completely rural counties with low median household income and high uninsured rates. They were more likely to use Medicaid, be in a high-risk age category, and have diabetes or obesity. During pregnancy, AI/AN pregnant people were more likely to have insufficient prenatal care (PNC), gestational diabetes, and pre-eclampsia. In the multilevel model, county accounted for 6% of model variance. Hypertension pre-eclampsia, and county rurality were significant predictors of SMM among AI/AN pregnant people. High-risk age, insufficient PNC and a low county insured rate were near-significant at p < 0.10. DISCUSSION: Community-level factors are significant contributors to SMM risk for AI/AN pregnant people in addition to hypertension and pre-eclampsia. These findings demonstrate the need for targeted support in pregnancy to AI/AN pregnant people, particularly those who live in rural and underserved communities.


What is already known on this subject? American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people face higher rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality, and the risk is exacerbated for rural Indigenous pregnant people.What this study adds? This publication uses a multilevel model to assess the contribution of community-level factors in severe maternal morbidity risk for American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people. This analysis highlights the important role that rurality, prenatal care adequacy and access to insurance play in maternal morbidity risk and discusses how those risks are disproportionately felt by American Indian and Alaska Native pregnant people in the Pacific Northwest.


Subject(s)
American Indian or Alaska Native , Pregnancy Complications , Residence Characteristics , Social Determinants of Health , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Alaska Natives/statistics & numerical data , American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/ethnology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/ethnology , Washington , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Northwestern United States/epidemiology , Medically Underserved Area , Medically Uninsured/ethnology , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data
17.
Cancer Causes Control ; 35(3): 487-496, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37874478

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between race/ethnicity and all-cause mortality among women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received systemic therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Cancer Database on women diagnosed with advanced-stage ovarian cancer from 2004 to 2015 who received systemic therapy. Race/ethnicity was categorized as Non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH-Black, Hispanic, NH-Asian/Pacific Islander, and Other. Income and education were combined to form a composite measure of socioeconomic status (SES) and categorized into low-, mid-, and high-SES. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess whether race/ethnicity was associated with the risk of death after adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted by SES, age, and surgery receipt. RESULTS: The study population comprised 53,367 women (52.4% ages ≥ 65 years, 82% NH-White, 8.7% NH-Black, 5.7% Hispanic, and 2.7% NH-Asian/Pacific Islander) in the analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the NH-Black race was associated with a higher risk of death versus NH-White race (aHR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.07,1.18), while Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower risk of death compared to NH-White women (aHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.95). Furthermore, NH-Black women versus NH-White women had an increased risk of mortality among those with low-SES characteristics (aHR:1.12; 95% CI:1.03-1.22) and mid-SES groups (aHR: 1.13; 95% CI:1.05-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Among women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received systemic therapy, NH-Black women experienced poorer survival compared to NH-White women. Future studies should be directed to identify drivers of ovarian cancer disparities, particularly racial differences in treatment response and surveillance.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Ovarian Neoplasms , Social Determinants of Health , Socioeconomic Disparities in Health , Female , Humans , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/ethnology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , White People/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Asian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data
19.
Psychiatry Res ; 330: 115560, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956588

ABSTRACT

Racism is a social determinant of mental health which has a disproportionally negative impact on the experiences of psychiatric inpatients of color. Distinct differences in the physical space and clinical settings of two inpatient buildings at a hospital system in the tristate (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut) area of the United States led to the present investigation of racial inequities in the assignment of patients to specific buildings and units. Archival electronic medical record data were analyzed from over 18,000 unique patients over a period of six years. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were conducted with assigned building (old vs. new building) as the binary outcome variable. Non-Hispanic White patients were set as the reference group. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to better resourced units in the new building. When limiting the analysis to only general adult units, Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to units in the new building. These results suggest ethnoracial inequities in patient assignment to buildings which differed in clinical and physical conditions. The findings serve as a call to action for hospital systems to examine the ways in which structural racism impact clinical care.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Racism , Social Determinants of Health , Adult , Humans , Black People , Hispanic or Latino , Inpatients/psychology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/ethnology , Racial Groups/psychology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Racism/ethnology , Racism/statistics & numerical data , United States , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , White , Asian , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data
20.
Int J Equity Health ; 22(1): 219, 2023 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37848883

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had major ramifications for health and the economy at both the individual and collective levels. This study examined exogenous negative changes in household income and their implications on psychological well-being (PWB) among the Chinese population during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were drawn from the early China COVID-19 Survey, a cross-sectional anonymous online survey administered to the general population in China. Self-reported PWB was measured using a 5-point Likert scale with five questions related to the participants' recent psychological state. Hierarchical multiple linear regression was employed to examine whether income loss during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with poor psychological health. RESULTS: This study included 8,428 adults, of which 90% had suffered from a moderate or severe loss of household income due to the early COVID-19 pandemic. Those who had experienced moderate or severe loss of income scored significantly lower on psychological well-being than those who did not experience income loss (19.96 or 18.07 vs. 21.46; P < 0.001); after controlling for confounders, income loss was negatively associated with PWB scores (moderate income loss: B = - 0.603, P < 0.001; severe income loss: B = - 1.261, P < 0.001). An interaction effect existed between the degree of income loss and pre-pandemic income groups. Specifically, participants in the middle-income group who had suffered severe income loss scored the lowest on PWB (B = - 1.529, P < 0.001). There was also a main effect on income loss, such that participants with varying degrees of income loss differed across five dimensions, including anhedonia, sleep problems, irritability or anger, difficulty with concentration, and repeated disturbing dreams related to COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Income loss during the pandemic has had detrimental consequences on psychological well-being, and the magnitude of the impact of income loss on psychological well-being varied according to previous income levels. Future policy efforts should be directed toward improving the psychological well-being of the economically vulnerable and helping them recover from lost income in the shortest time possible.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , East Asian People , Financial Stress , Social Determinants of Health , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/ethnology , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , East Asian People/psychology , East Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Psychological Well-Being , Income , Financial Stress/economics , Financial Stress/epidemiology , Financial Stress/ethnology , Financial Stress/psychology , Social Determinants of Health/economics , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health/economics , Mental Health/ethnology , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...