2021 Otto Aufranc Award: A simple Hip-Spine Classification for total hip arthroplasty : validation and a large multicentre series.

AIMS: Patients with spinal pathology who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an increased risk of dislocation and revision. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of the Hip-Spine Classification system in these patients would result in a decreased rate of postoperative dislocation in patients with spinal pathology. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre study evaluated 3,777 consecutive patients undergoing THA by three surgeons, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were categorized using The Hip-Spine Classification system: group 1 with normal spinal alignment; group 2 with a flatback deformity, group 2A with normal spinal mobility, and group 2B with a stiff spine. Flatback deformity was defined by a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis of > 10°, and spinal stiffness was defined by < 10° change in sacral slope from standing to seated. Each category determined a patient-specific component positioning. Survivorship free of dislocation was recorded and spinopelvic measurements were compared for reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 2,081 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 987 group 1A, 232 group 1B, 715 group 2A, and 147 group 2B patients. A total of 70 patients had a lumbar fusion, most had L4-5 (16; 23%) or L4-S1 (12; 17%) fusions; 51 patients (73%) had one or two levels fused, and 19 (27%) had > three levels fused. Dual mobility (DM) components were used in 166 patients (8%), including all of those in group 2B and with > three level fusions. Survivorship free of dislocation at five years was 99.2% with a 0.8% dislocation rate. The correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.91). CONCLUSION: This is the largest series in the literature evaluating the relationship between hip-spine pathology and dislocation after THA, and guiding appropriate treatment. The Hip-Spine Classification system allows surgeons to make appropriate evaluations preoperatively, and it guides the use of DM components in patients with spinopelvic pathology in order to reduce the risk of dislocation in these high-risk patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):17-24.

Development and Validation of a Multidomain Surgical Complication Classification System for Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of example cases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and repeatability of a new comprehensive classification system for capturing complications data in adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Complications are common in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, no consensus exists on the definition or classification of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. The lack of consensus significantly limits understanding of complications' effects on outcomes in surgery for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Using a Delphi method, members of the International Spine Study Group, AO Spine, and the European Spine Study Group collaborated to develop an adult spinal deformity classification system. The multidomain classification system accounts for medical complications (cancer, cardiopulmonary, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, infectious, musculoskeletal, renal) and surgical complications (implant complications, radiographic complications, neurologic events, intraoperative events, and wound complications). Seventeen individuals ("event readers"), including spine surgeons, trainees, and research coordinators, used the new classification system two separate times to analyze complications in ten example cases. The accuracy and repeatability of the classification system were subsequently calculated based on the providers' responses for the example cases. RESULTS: The 10 example cases included 22 complications. Nearly 95% of complications were captured by >95% of the event readers. The system demonstrated good repeatability of 86.9% between the first and second set of responses provided by event readers. CONCLUSION: The ISSG-AO Multi-Domain Spinal Deformity Complication Classification System for Adult Spinal Deformity demonstrated good accuracy and repeatability among both surgeons and research coordinators in capturing complications in adult spinal deformity surgery. The ISSG-AO system may be applied to help better understand the impact of complications on outcomes and costs in adult spinal deformity surgery.Level of Evidence: 5.

Response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic by the Spine Division at a Level-I Academic Referral Center.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a ubiquitous health concern and a global pandemic. In an effort to slow the disease spread and protect valuable healthcare resources, cessation of nonessential surgery, including many orthopaedic procedures, has become commonplace. This crisis has created a unique situation in the care of spine patients as we must balance the urgency of patient evaluation, surgical intervention, and continued training against the risk of disease exposure and resource management. The spine division of an orthopaedic surgery department has taken an active role in enacting protocol changes in anticipation of COVID-19. In the initial 4 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic the spine division went from an average of 60.4 cases to 10 cases during the same timeframe. Clinic visits decreased from 417.4 to 322 with new patient visits decreasing from 28% to 20%. Three hundred eighteen of the 322 (98.7%) clinic visits were performed via telehealth. Although these changes have been forced upon us by necessity, we feel that our division and department will emerge in a more responsive, agile, and stronger state. As we look to the coming months and beyond, it will be important to continue to adapt to the changing landscape during unprecedented times.

George Chance and Frank Holdsworth: Understanding Spinal Instability and the Evolution of Modern Spine Injury Classification Systems.

The concept of spinal cord injury has existed since the earliest human civilizations, with the earliest documented cases dating back to 3000 BC under the Egyptian Empire. Howevr, an understanding of this field developed slowly, with real advancements not emerging until the 20th century. Technological advancements including the dawn of modern warfare producing mass human casualties instigated revolutionary advancement in the field of spine injury and its management. Spine surgeons today encounter "Chance" and "Holdsworth" fractures commonly; however, neurosurgical literature has not explored the history of these physicians and their groundbreaking contributions to the modern understanding of spine injury. A literature search using a historical database, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed was performed. As needed, hospitals and native universities were contacted to add their original contributions to the literature. George Quentin Chance, a Manchester-based British physician, is well known to many as an eminent radiologist of his time who described the eponymous fracture in 1948. Sir Frank Wild Holdsworth (1904-1969), a renowned British orthopedic surgeon who laid a solid foundation for rehabilitation of spinal injuries under the aegis of the Miners' Welfare Commission, described in detail the management of thoraco-lumbar junctional rotational fracture. The work of these 2 men laid the foundation for today's understanding of spinal instability, which is central to modern spine injury classification and management algorithms. This historical vignette will explore the academic legacies of Sir Frank Wild Holdsworth and George Quentin Chance, and the evolution of spinal instability and spine injury classification systems that ensued from their work.

Artificial Intelligence Based Hierarchical Clustering of Patient Types and Intervention Categories in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Towards a New Classification Scheme that Predicts Quality and Value.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected, multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) databases. OBJECTIVE: To apply artificial intelligence (AI)-based hierarchical clustering as a step toward a classification scheme that optimizes overall quality, value, and safety for ASD surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior ASD classifications have focused on radiographic parameters associated with patient reported outcomes. Recent work suggests there are many other impactful preoperative data points. However, the ability to segregate patient patterns manually based on hundreds of data points is beyond practical application for surgeons. Unsupervised machine-based clustering of patient types alongside surgical options may simplify analysis of ASD patient types, procedures, and outcomes. METHODS: Two prospective cohorts were queried for surgical ASD patients with baseline, 1-year, and 2-year SRS-22/Oswestry Disability Index/SF-36v2 data. Two dendrograms were fitted, one with surgical features and one with patient characteristics. Both were built with Ward distances and optimized with the gap method. For each possible n patient cluster by m surgery, normalized 2-year improvement and major complication rates were computed. RESULTS: Five hundred-seventy patients were included. Three optimal patient types were identified: young with coronal plane deformity (YC, n = 195), older with prior spine surgeries (ORev, n = 157), and older without prior spine surgeries (OPrim, n = 218). Osteotomy type, instrumentation and interbody fusion were combined to define four surgical clusters. The intersection of patient-based and surgery-based clusters yielded 12 subgroups, with major complication rates ranging from 0% to 51.8% and 2-year normalized improvement ranging from -0.1% for SF36v2 MCS in cluster [1,3] to 100.2% for SRS self-image score in cluster [2,1]. CONCLUSION: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering can identify data patterns that may augment preoperative decision-making through construction of a 2-year risk-benefit grid. In addition to creating a novel AI-based ASD classification, pattern identification may facilitate treatment optimization by educating surgeons on which treatment patterns yield optimal improvement with lowest risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Lumbar spine fusion: what is the evidence?

Lumbar spine fusion is a common procedure associated with a high cost burden and risk of serious complications. We aimed to summarise systematic reviews on the effectiveness of lumbar spine fusion for most diagnoses. We found no high-quality systematic reviews and the risk of bias of the randomised controlled trials in the reviews was generally high. The available evidence does not support a benefit from spine fusion compared to non-operative alternatives for back pain associated with degeneration. The available evidence does not support a clinical benefit from spine fusion compared to non-operative treatment or stabilisation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. Benefits of spine fusion compared to non-operative treatment for isthmic spondylolisthesis are unclear (one trial at high risk of bias). Surgical intervention for metastatic carcinoma of the spine associated with spinal cord compromise improves mobility and neurological outcome (based on a single trial). Better evidence is required to determine more accurately the effectiveness of spine fusion surgery for all indications. Patients contemplating spinal fusion should be fully informed about the evidence base for their particular problem, including the relative potential benefits and harms of fusion compared with non-operative treatments.

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with degenerative lumbar disease.

PURPOSE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into the Korean language and to test the psychometric properties of the Korean COMI in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. METHODS: A cross-cultural adaptation of the COMI into Korean was carried out using established guidelines. A total of 117 patients with lumbar spinal diseases were recruited from the spinal center of a tertiary care teaching institution and completed a baseline questionnaire including the newly translated COMI, the visual analog scale for back pain and for leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D). Within 2 weeks after the first assessment, 83 (71%) completed a second COMI questionnaire and a transition question (no change, slight change, moderate change, a lot of change) by phone to assess reproducibility. RESULTS: COMI summary scores displayed 1.7% floor effects and no ceiling effect. For construct validity, each COMI item and COMI summary score well correlated with its corresponding reference questionnaire. Therefore, the predefined hypotheses for the construct validities of each COMI item (ρ > 0.4 with the corresponding questionnaire) and the COMI summary score (ρ > 0.6 with both ODI and EQ-5D) were confirmed. Intraclass correlation coefficients of each COMI item and summary score ranged from 0.93 to 0.98. Therefore, the hypothesis for reliability (ICC > 0.8) was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights that the Korean version of the COMI is a reliable and valid outcome tool for use in Korean-speaking patients with degenerative lumbar spinal disease. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Global Spine Care Initiative: resources to implement a spine care program.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a list of resources necessary to implement a model of care for the management of spine-related concerns anywhere in the world, but especially in underserved communities and low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: Contents from the Global Spine Care Initiative (GSCI) Classification System and GSCI care pathway papers provided a foundation for the resources list. A seed document was developed that included resources for spine care that could be delivered in primary, secondary and tertiary settings, as well as resources needed for self-care and community-based settings for a wide variety of spine concerns (e.g., back and neck pain, deformity, spine injury, neurological conditions, pathology and spinal diseases). An iterative expert consensus process was used using electronic surveys. RESULTS: Thirty-five experts completed the process. An iterative consensus process was used through an electronic survey. A consensus was reached after two rounds. The checklist of resources included the following categories: healthcare provider knowledge and skills, materials and equipment, human resources, facilities and infrastructure. The list identifies resources needed to implement a spine care program in any community, which are based upon spine care needs. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first international and interprofessional attempt to develop a list of resources needed to deliver care in an evidence-based care pathway for the management of people presenting with spine-related concerns. This resource list needs to be field tested in a variety of communities with different resource capacities to verify its utility. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Global Spine Care Initiative: classification system for spine-related concerns.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to describe the development of a classification system that would apply to anyone with a spine-related concern and that can be used in an evidence-based spine care pathway. METHODS: Existing classification systems for spinal disorders were assembled. A seed document was developed through round-table discussions followed by a modified Delphi process. International and interprofessional clinicians and scientists with expertise in spine-related conditions were invited to participate. RESULTS: Thirty-six experts from 15 countries participated. After the second round, there was 95% agreement of the proposed classification system. The six major classifications included: no or minimal symptoms (class 0); mild symptoms (i.e., neck or back pain) but no interference with activities (class I); moderate or severe symptoms with interference of activities (class II); spine-related neurological signs or symptoms (class III); severe bony spine deformity, trauma or pathology (class IV); and spine-related symptoms or destructive lesions associated with systemic pathology (class V). Subclasses for each major class included chronicity and severity when different interventions were anticipated or recommended. CONCLUSIONS: An international and interprofessional group developed a comprehensive classification system for all potential presentations of people who may seek care or advice at a spine care program. This classification can be used in the development of a spine care pathway, in clinical practice, and for research purposes. This classification needs to be tested for validity, reliability, and consistency among clinicians from different specialties and in different communities and cultures. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Vertebral body osteonecrosis: proposal of a treatment-oriented classification system.

PURPOSE: To present a classification system for vertebral body osteonecrosis (VBON) based on imaging findings and sagittal alignment and consequently to propose treatment guidelines. METHODS: Chart review and classification of imaging and clinical findings. An analysis of literature about VBON has been evaluated to conceive the classification. The current data allows to correlate radiological findings with different stages of the pathophysiological process and consequently to propose a patient-tailored treatment plan. RESULTS: The classification identifies 4 stages: stage 0 (theoretical phase), stage 1 (early phase), stage 2 (instability phase) and stage 3 (fixed deformity phase). Local (angular kyphosis expressed as anterior-posterior wall height ratio) and global (sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt) sagittal alignment are considered as complementary modifiers to tailor the most suitable treatment. Stage 1 is generally managed conservatively. Stage 2 and 3 often require different surgical approaches according to local and global sagittal alignment. CONCLUSIONS: The classification allows a systematic staging of this disease and can help establish a proper and patient-oriented treatment plan. Further researches are advocated to fully validate the proposed classification system. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

External validation of the adult spinal deformity (ASD) frailty index (ASD-FI).

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of the recently developed adult spinal deformity frailty index (ASD-FI) to predict odds of perioperative complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery using a database other than the one used to create the index. METHODS: We used the ASD-FI to calculate frailty scores for 266 ASD patients who had minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years in the European Spine Study Group (ESSG) database. Patients were enrolled from 2012 through 2013. Using ASD-FI scores, we categorized patients as not frail (NF) (< 0.3 points), frail (0.3-0.5 points), or severely frail (SF) (> 0.5 points). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for preoperative and surgical factors such as operative time and blood loss, was performed to determine the relationship between ASD-FI category and odds of major complications, odds of reoperation, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: We categorized 135 patients (51%) as NF, 90 patients (34%) as frail, and 41 patients (15%) as SF. Overall mean ASD-FI score was 0.29 (range 0-0.8). The adjusted odds of experiencing a major intraoperative or postoperative complication (OR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0-10) or having a reoperation (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-8.9) were higher for SF patients compared with NF patients. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 times longer (95% CI 1.8-2.4) for SF patients compared with NF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Greater patient frailty, as measured by the ASD-FI, is associated with longer hospital stays and greater odds of major complications and reoperation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

[A new classification of surgical complications in adult spinal deformity]. / Eine neue Komplikationsklassifikation in der adulten spinalen Deformitätenchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: In the light of the increasingly aging population and the widespread understanding of the sagittal profile of symptomatic patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), pervasive utilization of osteotomies on the vertebral column should be expected. These surgeries are accompanied with relatively high complication rates. However, there is no uniform definition or classification in terms of grading the severity or chronological incidence of complications after ASD surgery. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work is to give an overview of the different classifications described in the literature hitherto and to propose a standardized, clinically utile classification of complications after ASD surgery. Finally, the aim is to illustrate this classification using two case examples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic PubMed search with the keywords: "adult spinal deformity", "surgery", "complications" and "classification". Results were screened by title, abstract and full-text article. RESULTS: 22 articles were included in this review. Regarding the systematic classification of the severity of a complication, the CTCAE classification (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0) is a validated and well-established severity stratification tool used in oncologic treatment. Regarding chronological occurrence, complications can be categorized into three phases: intra-operative, peri-operative and post-operative. DISCUSSION: The time of occurrence of a certain complication and its severity should constitute the cornerstones of a standardized and practical classification of complications after ASD surgery. To enable uniform reporting and coherent documentation of complications, spine surgeons should find consensus on a standardized classification. Future work needs to be directed towards defining and conducting an individual pre-operative risk stratification of adult spine deformity surgical candidates leading to a possible mitigation of surgery-related complications.

Assessment and management of adult spinal deformities.

Adult spinal deformity is a complex condition, increasing in prevalence, and occurring in a patient population in which it poses unique challenges. This review provides an overview of adult spinal deformity with a particular focus on its clinical evaluation, radiological assessment and classification, reviewing the current literature and amalgamating this with the authors' clinical experience.

Vertebral anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a retrospective analysis of 991 patients.

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by an underdevelopment of the facial structures arising from the first and second branchial arches, but extracraniofacial anomalies such as vertebral anomalies may be present. This retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence and types of vertebral anomalies and the association with other extracraniofacial anomalies in patients with CFM. The charts of all patients diagnosed with CFM seen in four craniofacial centres were reviewed for the presence of vertebral anomalies, symptoms, extracraniofacial anomalies, and the OMENS classification including the Pruzansky-Kaban type of mandibular deformity. A total of 991 patients were included and 28% of the patients had vertebral anomalies. The most common vertebral anomalies included scoliosis, block vertebrae, and hemivertebrae. Only 44% of the patients with vertebral anomalies had clinical symptoms; torticollis, back or neck pain, and limited neck movement were the most frequently seen. The prevalence of vertebral anomalies was greater in patients with bilateral CFM and in patients with a more severe mandibular deformity, and/or orbit, facial nerve, and/or soft tissue involvement. Patients with vertebral anomalies had significantly more extracraniofacial anomalies than patients without vertebral anomalies. Therefore, patients with vertebral anomalies should undergo cardiac, renal, and neurological evaluation.

Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Hart-ISSG Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Reliability/external validation study. OBJECTIVE: Investigate inter- and intrarater reliability of the Hart-International Spine Study Group (ISSG) Proximal Junctional Failure Severity Scale (PJFSS) and its correlation with operative revision in patients with proximal junctional failure (PJF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Hart-ISSG PJFSS is a validated classification system for PJF. Reliability of the PJFSS has not been assessed. METHODS: Sixteen detailed clinical scenarios were assessed using the ISSG PJFSS classification in six categories: neurologic status, axial pain, instrumentation issue, proximal kyphotic angle, level of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), and severity of UIV/UIV+1 fracture. Eleven spine surgeons evaluated each case in all six categories during two different assessments, and provided recommendations regarding operative revision or observation for each case. Inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated based on intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS: All intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated "almost perfect"' (0.817-0.988) inter-rater agreement for both assessments, except UIV/UIV+1 fracture severity during the second assessment, which demonstrated "substantial" agreement' (0.692). Five of six categories had "almost perfect" mean intrarater reliability (0.805-0.981), while "instrumentation issue" demonstrated "substantial" mean agreement (0.757). Inter-rater reliability for recommendation of surgical intervention was "almost perfect" during both assessments (0.911 and 0.922, respectively). Mean PJFSS scores between the two assessments were significantly higher for cases recommended for operative revision (8.43 ±â€Š0.90) versus cases recommended for observation (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The ISSG PJFSS is a reliable and repeatable classification system for assessing patients with PJF. Higher PJFSS scales correlate with recommendation for operative revision, extending prior external validation of the PJFSS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Diagnostics and treatment of benign spinal tumors]. / Diagnostik und Therapie benigner Tumoren der Wirbelsäule.

Benign tumors of the spine are rare and may lead to unspecific back pain. The classification of the lesion is typically achieved with a combination of imaging techniques (MRI and CT scans) and, in some cases, a histological sampling to allow differentiation from malignant processes. Both open and interventional (CT guided) biopsies are possible, depending on the localization of the tumor. Treatment strategies are diverse, require an interdisciplinary approach, and include operative and interventional procedures. The following article gives an overview of the most important benign tumors of the spine, the typical features in imaging, and treatment strategies.

Clinical-radiographic correlation of degenerative changes of the spine - systematic review / Correlação clínico-radiológica das alterações degenerativas da coluna - revisão sistemática / Correlación clínico-radiológica de los cambios degenerativos de la columna - revisión sistemática

ABSTRACT Systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of images of degenerative changes of the spine and its clinical correlation. A systematic literature review was conducted, and the results evaluated for the presence of clinical correlation, as well as the type of imaging method used. The search terms were "Intervertebral Disc Degeneration", "Intervertebral disc", "Classification", "Anulus fibrosus", "Nucleus pulposus", "Lumbar spine", "Degenerative disc disease", "Degeneration", "Zygapophyseal Joint". We also assessed whether there were inter- and intraobserver agreement in the selected works and possible guidelines regarding the treatment and prognosis of patients. Of the 91 reviewed abstracts, 31 articles were selected that met the inclusion criteria. Six articles were related to the cervical spine, 13 to the lumbar spine and 12 were about changes not related specifically to a single segment of the spine. Articles that determined limiting values considered normal were also included, since variations were considered signs of degeneration or pathology. It was not possible to establish the relationship between the changes identified in imaging and the clinical history of patients, either define treatment and prognosis guidelines.

RESUMO Revisão sistemática da literatura de avaliação por imagem das alterações degenerativas da coluna e sua correlação clínica. A revisão sistemática da literatura foi realizada e seus resultados, avaliados com relação à presença de correlação clínica, assim como o tipo de método de imagem utilizado. Os termos de pesquisa foram "Intervertebral Disc Degeneration", "Intervertebral disc", "Classification", "Anulus fibrosus", "Nucleus pulposus", "Lumbar spine", "Degenerative disc disease", "Degeneration", "Zygapophyseal Joint". Também se avaliou se houve concordância inter e intraobservador nos trabalhos selecionados e possíveis orientações com relação ao tratamento e ao prognóstico dos pacientes. Dos 91 resumos revisados, foram selecionados 31 artigos que satisfizeram os critérios de inclusão. Seis artigos estavam relacionados com a coluna cervical, 13 com a coluna lombar e 12 versavam sobre alterações não relacionadas especificamente com um único segmento da coluna. Os artigos que determinaram valores limítrofes considerados normais também foram incluídos, uma vez que suas variações foram consideradas sinais de degeneração ou patologia. Não foi possível estabelecer a relação entre alterações identificadas nos exames de imagem e a história clínica dos pacientes, tampouco definir orientações de tratamento e prognóstico.

RESUMEN Revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre evaluación por imágenes de los cambios degenerativos de la columna y su correlación clínica. Fue realizada una revisión sistemática de la literatura y sus resultados evaluados cuanto a la presencia de correlación clínica, así como al tipo de método de imagen utilizado. Los términos de búsqueda fueron "Intervertebral Disc Degeneration", "Intervertebral disc", "Classification", "Anulus fibrosus", "Nucleus pulposus", "Lumbar spine", "Degenerative disc disease", "Degeneration", "Zygapophyseal Joint". Se evaluó también si había concordancia inter e intraobservador en los trabajos seleccionados, además de las posibles orientaciones en cuanto al tratamiento y al pronóstico de los pacientes. De los 91 resúmenes revisados, treinta y un artículos que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión fueron seleccionados. Seis artículos estaban relacionados con la columna cervical, 13 con la columna lumbar y 12 eran acerca de cambios no relacionados específicamente a un solo segmento de la columna vertebral. También se incluyeron artículos que determinaron valores límites considerados normales, ya que los cambios fueron considerados señales de degeneración o patología. No fue posible establecer la relación entre los cambios identificados en las imágenes y la historia clínica de los pacientes, tampoco definir orientaciones de tratamiento y pronóstico.

Cultural adaptation and validation for portuguese of the spinal appearance questionnaire / Adaptação cultural e validação do questionário da aparência da coluna vertebral em português / Adaptación cultural y validación en portugués del cuestionario de la apariencia de la columna

ABSTRACT Objective: Make the cultural adaptation of the spinal appearance questionnaire (SAQ). Method: Twenty patients and their accompanying relatives responded to SAC and were asked about possible improvements. Results: Eighteen girls (90%) and two boys (10%), average age 14.8 years; Cronbach's alpha values of 0.79 and 0.75 were found for patients and parents respectively. Conclusion: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the spinal appearance questionnaire presented in this paper proves to be a valid tool for their purposes in its pre-trial phase.

RESUMO Objetivo: Fazer a adaptação cultural do questionário da aparência da coluna (QAC). Método: Vinte pacientes e seus parentes acompanhantes responderam ao QAC e foram questionados quanto a possíveis melhorias. Resultados: Dezoito meninas (90%) e dois meninos (10%); média de idade de 14,8 anos; encontrados valores do alfa de Cronbach de 0,79 e 0,75 para pacientes e parentes respectivamente. Conclusão: A versão em português brasileiro do questionário da aparência da coluna vertebral apresentado neste trabalho mostra-se um instrumento válido para os seus fins na sua fase de pré-teste.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Hacer la adaptación cultural del cuestionario de la apariencia de la columna (CAC). Método: Veinte pacientes y sus familiares acompañantes respondieron al CAC y se les preguntó acerca de posibles mejoras. Resultados: Dieciocho niñas (90%) y dos niños (10%); edad media de 14,8 años; se han encontrado valores alfa de Cronbach de 0,79 y 0,75 para los pacientes y sus familiares, respectivamente. Conclusión: La versión en portugués del cuestionario de la apariencia de la columna presentado en este trabajo, demuestra que es un instrumento válido para sus propósitos en su fase pre-test.

Effect of Adding McKenzie Syndrome, Centralization, Directional Preference, and Psychosocial Classification Variables to a Risk-Adjusted Model Predicting Functional Status Outcomes for Patients With Lumbar Impairments.

Study Design Retrospective cohort. Background Patient-classification subgroupings may be important prognostic factors explaining outcomes. Objectives To determine effects of adding classification variables (McKenzie syndrome and pain patterns, including centralization and directional preference; Symptom Checklist Back Pain Prediction Model [SCL BPPM]; and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire subscales of work and physical activity) to a baseline risk-adjusted model predicting functional status (FS) outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients completed a battery of questionnaires that gathered information on 11 risk-adjustment variables. Physical therapists trained in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy methods classified each patient by McKenzie syndromes and pain pattern. Functional status was assessed at discharge by patient-reported outcomes. Only patients with complete data were included. Risk of selection bias was assessed. Prediction of discharge FS was assessed using linear stepwise regression models, allowing 13 variables to enter the model. Significant variables were retained in subsequent models. Model power (R(2)) and beta coefficients for model variables were estimated. Results Two thousand sixty-six patients with lumbar impairments were evaluated. Of those, 994 (48%), 10 (<1%), and 601 (29%) were excluded due to incomplete psychosocial data, McKenzie classification data, and missing FS at discharge, respectively. The final sample for analyses was 723 (35%). Overall R(2) for the baseline prediction FS model was 0.40. Adding classification variables to the baseline model did not result in significant increases in R(2). McKenzie syndrome or pain pattern explained 2.8% and 3.0% of the variance, respectively. When pain pattern and SCL BPPM were added simultaneously, overall model R(2) increased to 0.44. Although none of these increases in R(2) were significant, some classification variables were stronger predictors compared with some other variables included in the baseline model. Conclusion The small added prognostic capabilities identified when combining McKenzie or pain-pattern classifications with the SCL BPPM classification did not significantly improve prediction of FS outcomes in this study. Additional research is warranted to investigate the importance of classification variables compared with those used in the baseline model to maximize predictive power. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(9):726-741. Epub 31 Jul 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6266.