ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) addresses the special needs of geriatric fracture patients. Most of the research on OGCM focused on hip fractures while results concerning other severe fractures are rare. We conducted a health-economic evaluation of OGCM for pelvic and vertebral fractures. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used German health and long-term care insurance claims data and included cases of geriatric patients aged 80 years or older treated in an OGCM (OGCM group) or a non-OGCM hospital (non-OGCM group) due to pelvic or vertebral fractures in 2014-2018. We analyzed life years gained, fracture-free life years gained, healthcare costs, and cost-effectiveness within 1 year. We applied entropy balancing, weighted gamma and two-part models. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: We included 21,036 cases with pelvic (71.2% in the OGCM, 28.8% in the non-OGCM group) and 33,827 with vertebral fractures (72.8% OGCM, 27.2% non-OGCM group). 4.5-5.9% of the pelvic and 31.8-33.8% of the vertebral fracture cases were treated surgically. Total healthcare costs were significantly higher after treatment in OGCM compared to non-OGCM hospitals for both fracture cohorts. For both fracture cohorts, a 95% probability of cost-effectiveness was not exceeded for a willingness-to-pay of up to 150,000 per life year or 150,000 per fracture-free life year gained. CONCLUSION: We did not obtain distinct benefits of treatment in an OGCM hospital. Assigning cases to OGCM or non-OGCM group on hospital level might have underestimated the effect of OGCM as not all patients in the OGCM group have received OGCM.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Germany/epidemiology , Pelvic Bones/injuriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efffectiveness of a titanium vertebral augmentation device (SpineJack system) in terms of back pain, radiological outcomes, and economic burden compared with nonsurgical management (NSM) (bracing) for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Complications were also evaluated for both treatment methods. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was performed at 9 French sites. Patients (n = 100) with acute traumatic Magerl type A1 and A3.1 vertebral fractures were enrolled and randomized to treatment with the SpineJack system or NSM consisting of bracing and administration of pain medication. Participants were monitored at admission, during the procedure, and at 1, 12, and 24 months after treatment initiation. Primary outcomes included visual analog scale back pain score, and secondary outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] score), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D score), radiological measures (vertebral kyphosis angle [VKA] and regional traumatic angulation [RTA]), and economic outcomes (costs, procedures, hours of help, and time to return to work). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included in the analysis, with 48 in the SpineJack group and 47 in the NSM group. Back pain improved significantly for all participants with no significant differences between groups. ODI and EQ-5D scores improved significantly between baseline and follow-up (1, 12, and 24 months) for all participants, with the SpineJack group showing a larger improvement than the NSM group between baseline and 1 month. VKA was significantly lower (p < 0.001) (i.e., better) in the SpineJack group than in the NSM group at 1, 12, and 24 months of follow-up. There was no significant change over time in RTA for the SpineJack group, but the NSM group showed a significant worsening in RTA over time. SpineJack treatment was associated with higher costs than NSM but involved a shorter hospital stay, fewer medical visits, and fewer hours of nursing care. Time to return to work was significantly shorter for the SpineJack group than for the NSM group. There were no significant differences in complications between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no statistical difference in the primary outcomes between the SpineJack treatment group and the NSM group. In terms of secondary outcomes, SpineJack treatment was associated with better radiological outcomes, shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, and fewer hours of nursing care.
Subject(s)
Back Pain , Braces , Fractures, Compression , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Male , Female , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fractures/economics , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Fractures, Compression/therapy , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Back Pain/therapy , Back Pain/etiology , Back Pain/economics , Adult , Quality of Life , Pain Measurement , TitaniumABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of conventional open pedicle screw fixation (COPSF), percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and paraspinal posterior open approach pedicle screw fixation (POPSF) for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who were posteriorly stabilized without graft fusion. Among them, 36 patients underwent COPSF, 38 patients underwent PPSF, and 34 patients underwent POPSF. The clinical outcomes, relative operation indexes, and radiological findings were assessed and compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: All of the patients were followed up for a mean time of 20 months. The PPSF group and POPSF group had shorter operation times, lower amounts of intraoperative blood loss, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the COPSF group (P < 0.05). The radiation times and hospitalization costs were highest in the PPSF group (P < 0.05). Every group exhibited significant improvements in the Cobb angle (CA) and the vertebral body angle (VBA) correction (all P < 0.05). The COPSF group and the POPSF group had better improvements than the PPSF group at 3 days postoperation and the POPSF group had the best improvements in the last follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PPSF and POPSF achieved similar effects as COPSF while also resulting in lower incidences of injury. PPSF is more advantageous in the early rehabilitation time period, compared with COPSF, but POPSF is a better option when considering the long-term effects, the costs of treatment, and the radiation times.
Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/innervation , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/innervation , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Adult , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pedicle Screws , Retrospective Studies , Safety , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/rehabilitation , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify delays for surgery to stabilize unstable thoracolumbar fractures and the main reasons for them across Latin America. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 547 patients with type B or C thoracolumbar fractures from 21 spine centers across 9 Latin American countries. Data were collected on demographics, mechanism of trauma, time between hospital arrival and surgery, type of hospital (public vs. private), fracture classification, spinal level of injury, neurologic status (American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale), number of levels instrumented, and reason for delay between hospital arrival and surgical treatment. RESULTS: The sample included 403 men (73.6%) and 144 women (26.3%), with a mean age of 40.6 years. The main mechanism of trauma was falls (44.4%), followed by car accidents (24.5%). The most frequent pattern of injury was B2 injuries (46.6%), and the most affected level was T12-L1 (42.2%). Neurologic status at admission was 60.5% intact and 22.9% American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale A. The time from admission to surgery was >72 hours in over half the patients and over a week in >25% of them. The most commonly reported reasons for surgical delay were clinical instability (22.9%), lack of operating room availability (22.7%), and lack of hardware for spinal instrumentation (e.g., screws/rods) (18.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Timing for surgery in this sample of unstable fractures was over 72 hours in more than half of the sample and longer than a week in about a quarter. The main reasons for this delay were clinical instability and lack of economic resources. There is an apparent need for increased funding for the treatment of spinal trauma patients in Latin America.
Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Hospitals/classification , Humans , Internal Fixators/supply & distribution , Joint Instability , Latin America , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Fractures/economics , Time-to-Treatment , Trauma Centers , Young AdultABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To identify nationwide temporal trends in management of geriatric odontoid fractures and to compare comorbidities, inpatient complications, hospital characteristics, and cost between patients receiving operative versus nonoperative management. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures remains controversial with some studies demonstrating decreased mortality and improved functional outcomes associated with operative management and significant morbidity associated with halo devices during nonoperative management. METHODS: Patients between ages 65 to 90 years with odontoid fractures who underwent operative or nonoperative management between the years 2003 and 2017 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Year of injury, demographic variables, comorbidities, inpatient complications, mortality, length of stay, inpatient cost, and hospital characteristics were compared between operative and nonoperative treatment groups. RESULTS: Thirty two thousand four hundred nineteen patients (average age 77 yr, 54% female) were included in the final analysis. Operative treatment occurred in 21,954 (67%) patients and nonoperative treatment occurred in 10,465 (32%). In 2003, operative treatment occurred in 46% of patients and nearly doubled to 86% in 2017, with an average increase of 3.7% per year (Pâ<â0.001). Patients undergoing operative management had a lower prevalence of at least one major medical comorbidity (76% vs. 83%, Pâ<â0.001). Patients undergoing operative treatment demonstrated higher odds of developing most complications, particularly pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and renal (Pâ<â0.01). Inpatient mortality was 3.6% in patients receiving operative treatment and 5.9% in patients receiving nonoperative treatment (Pâ<â0.001). Average cost per episode of care during the study period was $131,855 for operative treatment and $65,374 for nonoperative treatment (Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a clear national paradigm shift in the management of geriatric odontoid fractures, wherein operative management nearly doubled from 46% in 2003 to 86% in 2017.Level of Evidence: 3.
Subject(s)
Odontoid Process , Spinal Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To explore the national inpatient trends, regional variations, associated diagnoses, and outcomes of vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty) in the USA from 2004 to 2017. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to study hospitalization records for percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Longitudinal projections of trends and outcomes, including mortality, post-procedural complications, length of stay, disposition, and total hospital charges were analyzed. RESULTS: Following a period of decreased utilization from 2008 to 2012, hospitalizations for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty plateaued after 2013. Total hospital charges and overall financial burden of hospitalizations for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty increased to a peak of $1.9 billion (range $1.7-$2.2 billion) in 2017. Overall, 8% of procedures were performed in patients with a history of malignancy. In multivariable modeling, lung cancer (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.6 (range 1.4-5.1)) and prostate cancer (aOR 3.4 (range 1.2-9.4)) were associated with a higher risk of mortality. The New England region had the lowest frequency of routine disposition (14.1±1.1%) and the lowest average hospital charges ($47 885±$1351). In contrast, 34.0±0.8% had routine disposition in the West Central South region, and average hospital charges were as high as $99 836±$2259 in the Pacific region. The Mountain region had the lowest number of procedures (5365±272) and the highest mortality rate (1.2±0.3%). CONCLUSION: National inpatient trends of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty utilization remained stable after a period of decline from 2008 to 2012, while the financial burden of hospitalizations increased. Despite recent improvements in outcomes, significant regional variations persisted across the USA.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization/trends , Kyphoplasty/trends , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Vertebroplasty/trends , Aged , Databases, Factual/trends , Female , Fractures, Compression/economics , Fractures, Compression/epidemiology , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Hospital Charges/trends , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Inpatients , Kyphoplasty/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Fractures/economics , United States/epidemiology , Vertebroplasty/economicsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Survey study. OBJECTIVE: Assess practices and opinions of spine specialists from Europe and North America on orthosis use in adult patients with acute thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. Evaluate cost of the devices. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although orthosis are traditionally used in conservative treatment of TL fractures, recent systematic reviews showed no benefit in patient's outcomes. METHODS: A search for contact authors with publications on spine fractures from all European and North American countries was performed. An online questionnaire was sent on demographic data, practice setting, mean number of fractures treated, use of orthosis upon choice for conservative treatment, and average orthosis cost. Data was analyzed based in world regions, economic rank of the country, and health expenditure. RESULTS: We received 130 answers, from 28 European and five North American countries. Most responders had more than 9 years of practice and worked at a public hospital. 6.2% did not prescribe a brace in any patient with acute TL fractures conservatively treated and 11.5% brace all patients. In a scale from 1 to 5, 21 considered that there is no/low benefit (1) and 14 that bracing is essential (5), with a mean of 3.18. Europeans use orthosis less commonly than North Americans (Pâ<â0.05). Orthosis mean cost was $611.4â±â716.0, significantly higher in North America compared with Europe and in high income, when compared with upper middle income countries (both Pâ<â0.05). Although hospital costs were not evaluated, orthosis is costlier when it involves admission of the patient (Pâ<â0.05). An increase in orthosis cost associated with higher gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and higher health expenditure was found. CONCLUSION: More than 90% of spine specialists still use orthosis in conservative treatment of adult patients with acute TL fractures. Orthosis cost vary significantly between continents, and it is influenced by the country's economy.Level of Evidence: 4.
Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/economics , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Orthotic Devices/economics , Spinal Fractures/economics , Surgeons/economics , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Adult , Braces , Conservative Treatment/trends , Europe/epidemiology , Expert Testimony/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , North America/epidemiology , Orthotic Devices/trends , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Surgeons/trends , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE.: This study seeks to identify recent trends in utilization and reimbursements of these procedures between 2012and 2017, a period which experienced a change in national guideline recommendations for these procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures, including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, have been typically reserved for fractures associated with refractory pain, deformity, or progressive neurological symptoms. However, controversy exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of these procedures, in particular vertebroplasty. METHODS: Annual Medicare claims and payments to surgeons were aggregated at the county level to assess regional trends. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization rates, and reimbursement rates, and to examine associations between county-specific variables and outcome variables. RESULTS: A total of 24,316 vertebroplasties and 138,778 kyphoplasties were performed in the Medicare population between 2012 and 2017. Annual vertebroplasty volume fell by 48.0% from 5744 procedures in 2012 to 2987 in 2017, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -12.3%. Annual kyphoplasty volume also declined by 12.7% (CAGR -2.7%), from 24,986 in 2012 to 21,681 in 2017. Surgeon reimbursements for vertebral augmentation procedures increased by a weighted average of 93.7% (inflation-adjusted increase of 78.2%) between 2012 and 2017, which was primarily driven by a dramatic 113.3% (inflation-adjusted increase of 96.2%) increase in mean reimbursements for kyphoplasty procedures from an average of $895 to $1764, between 2012 and 2017, respectively. CONCLUSION: This large national Medicare database study found that vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedure volume and utilization of both procedures have declined significantly. Although average reimbursements to surgeons for vertebroplasties have significantly declined, payments for kyphoplasty procedures have risen significantly. Although vertebroplasty volume has significantly decreased, it is still being performed and being reimbursed for, in spite of its controversial role in its treatment of vertebral fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Subject(s)
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/trends , Kyphoplasty/trends , Medicare/trends , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Vertebroplasty/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fractures, Compression/economics , Fractures, Compression/epidemiology , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Kyphoplasty/economics , Male , Medicare/economics , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , United States/epidemiology , Vertebroplasty/economicsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Multi-center prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost of routine biopsy during augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF) and the affect it has on further treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty (VP) and Balloon Kyphoplasty (BKP) are accepted treatments for VCF. Bone biopsy is routinely performed during every VCF surgery in many centers around the world to exclude an incidental finding of malignancy as the cause of the pathological VCF. The incidence been reported as 0.7% to 7.3%, however the published cohorts are small and do not discuss cost-benefit aspects. METHODS: From 2008 to 2016 we performed 122 vertebral biopsies routinely on 116 patients in three hospitals. Twenty-three patients had history of malignancy (26 biopsies) and four were suspected of having malignancy based on imaging findings. The remaining 86 patients (99 biopsies) were presumed osteoporotic VCF. RESULTS: Out of 99 biopsies in the VCF cohort group only one yielded an unsuspected malignancy (1.16%), positive for multiple myeloma (MM). The ability of clinical assessment and imaging alone to diagnose malignancy was found to be 91.7% sensitive and 84.2% specific in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Routine bone biopsy during vertebral augmentation procedure is a safe option for evaluating the cause of the VCF but has significant cost to the health system. The cost of one diagnosed case of unsuspected malignancy was $31,000 in our study. The most common pathology was MM, which has not been proven to benefit from early diagnosis. When comparing clinical diagnosis with imaging, a previous history of malignancy was found in only 40.7% of VCF patients, while imaging was 100% accurate in predicting presence of malignancy on biopsy. This study reassures spine surgeons in their ability to diagnose malignant VCFs and does not support the significant cost of routine bone biopsies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fractures, Compression/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/economics , Vertebroplasty/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy/methods , Female , Fractures, Compression/surgery , Humans , Kyphoplasty/economics , Kyphoplasty/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Vertebroplasty/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vertebral cement augmentation techniques are routinely used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). In the current study, we used a state-level outpatient database to compare costs and postoperative outcomes between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. METHODS: We queried the 2016 Florida State-Ambulatory Surgery Database of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project for patients undergoing thoracolumbar vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (11.6%) who underwent vertebroplasty and 801 patients (88.4%) who underwent kyphoplasty were identified. Patients undergoing kyphoplasty were more likely to stay overnight or longer, with the P value trending toward significance (kyphoplasty with >1 day stay: 7.4% vs. vertebroplasty with >1 day stay: 1.9%; P = 0.086). Patients undergoing vertebroplasty had a significantly higher rate of discharge to home routine compared with patients undergoing kyphoplasty (97.1% [n = 102] vs. 94.1% [n = 754]; P < 0.001). Undergoing kyphoplasty was also associated with higher index admission costs ($40,706 vs. $18,965; P < 0.001) and higher readmission costs ($27,038 vs. $11,341; P = 0.046). The rates of 30-day and 90-day readmission were similar between the 2 groups (all P > 0.05). The rates of 30-day, 90-day, and overall readmission because of a new-onset fracture were also similar (all P > 0.05). However, vertebroplasty had a higher rate of readmissions associated with a procedure within a year (21.9% [n = 23] vs. 14.5% [n = 116]; P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses from a state-level database of patients undergoing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic VCFs show similar postoperative outcomes for the 2 procedures but a higher cost for kyphoplasty.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression/surgery , Kyphoplasty/economics , Kyphoplasty/methods , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Vertebroplasty/economics , Vertebroplasty/methods , Aged , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Fractures, Compression/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Outpatients , Spinal Fractures/economics , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Changes in health-related quality of life (QoL) due to hip, humeral, ankle, spine, and distal forearm fracture were measured in Russian adults age 50 years or more over the first 18 months after fracture. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27). INTRODUCTION: Data on QoL following osteoporotic fractures in Russia are scarce. The present study evaluated the impact of hip, vertebral, proximal humerus, distal forearm, and ankle fracture up to 18 months after fracture from the Russian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study. METHODS: Individuals age ≥ 50 years with low-energy-induced humeral, hip, clinical vertebral, ankle, or distal forearm fracture were enrolled. After a recall of pre-fracture status, HRQoL was prospectively collected over 18 months of follow-up using EQ-5D-3L. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify determinants of QALYs loss. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, patients with hip fracture (n = 223) reported the lowest mean health state utility value (HSUV) compared with other fracture sites. Thereafter, utility values increased but remained significantly lower than before fracture. For spine (n = 183), humerus (n = 166), and ankle fractures (n = 214), there was a similar pattern of disutility with a nadir within 2 weeks and a progressive recovery thereafter. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27). Substantial impairment in self-care and usual activities immediately after fracture were important predictors of recovery across at all fracture sites. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the hip, vertebral, distal forearm, ankle, and proximal humerus incur substantial loss of QoL in Russia. The utility values derived from this study can be used in future economic evaluations.
Subject(s)
Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/psychology , Cost of Illness , Female , Forearm Injuries/economics , Forearm Injuries/psychology , Hip Fractures/economics , Hip Fractures/psychology , Humans , Humeral Fractures/economics , Humeral Fractures/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/psychology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Russia/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/psychologyABSTRACT
This analysis examined costs/resources of 141 women with vertebral fractures, randomised to a home exercise programme or control group. Total, mean costs and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. Quality of life was collected. Cost drivers were caregiver time, medications and adverse events (AEs). Results show adding an exercise programme may reduce the risk of AEs. INTRODUCTION: This exploratory economic analysis examined the health resource utilisation and costs experienced by women with vertebral fractures, and explored the effects of home exercise on those costs. METHODS: Women ≥ 65 years with one or more X-ray-confirmed vertebral fractures were randomised 1:1 to a 12-month home exercise programme or equal attention control group. Clinical and health system resources were collected during monthly phone calls and daily diaries completed by participants. Intervention costs were included. Unit costs were applied to health system resources. Quality of life (QoL) information was collected via EQ-5D-5L at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one women were randomised. Overall total costs (CAD 2018) were $664,923 (intervention) and $614,033 (control), respectively. The top three cost drivers were caregiver time ($250,269 and $240,811), medications ($151,000 and $122,145) and AEs ($58,807 and $71,981). The mean cost per intervention participant of $9365 ± $9988 was higher compared with the mean cost per control participant of $8772 ± $9718. The mean EQ-5D index score was higher for the intervention participants (0.81 ± 0.11) compared with that of controls (0.79 ± 0.13). The differences in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (0.02) and mean cost ($593) were used to calculate the ICER of $29,650. CONCLUSIONS: Women with osteoporosis with a previous fracture experience a number of resources and associated costs that impact their care and quality of life. Caregiver time, medications and AEs are the biggest cost drivers for this population. The next steps would be to expand this feasibility study with more participants, longer-term follow-up and more regional variability.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy , Health Care Costs , Spinal Fractures/economics , Aged , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life YearsABSTRACT
The trial compared three physiotherapy approaches: manual or exercise therapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT) for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s). At 1 year, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups meaning there is inadequate evidence to support manual or exercise therapy. INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of different physiotherapy approaches for people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture(s) (OVF). METHODS: >Prospective, multicentre, adaptive, three-arm randomised controlled trial. Six hundred fifteen adults with back pain, osteoporosis, and at least 1 OVF participated. INTERVENTIONS: 7 individual physiotherapy sessions over 12 weeks focused on either manual therapy or home exercise compared with a single session of physiotherapy education (SSPT). The co-primary outcomes were quality of life and back muscle endurance measured by the QUALEFFO-41 and timed loaded standing (TLS) test at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. Mean QUALEFFO-41: - 1.3 (exercise), - 0.15 (manual), and - 1.2 (SSPT), a mean difference of - 0.2 (95% CI, - 3.2 to 1.6) for exercise and 1.3 (95% CI, - 1.8 to 2.9) for manual therapy. Mean TLS: 9.8 s (exercise), 13.6 s (manual), and 4.2 s (SSPT), a mean increase of 5.8 s (95% CI, - 4.8 to 20.5) for exercise and 9.7 s (95% CI, 0.1 to 24.9) for manual therapy. Exercise provided more quality-adjusted life years than SSPT but was more expensive. At 4 months, significant changes above SSPT occurred in endurance and balance in manual therapy, and in endurance for those ≤ 70 years, in balance, mobility, and walking in exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence was problematic. Benefits at 4 months did not persist and at 12 months, we found no significant differences between treatments. There is inadequate evidence a short physiotherapy intervention of either manual therapy or home exercise provides long-term benefits, but arguably short-term benefits are valuable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 49117867.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Physical Therapy Modalities , Spinal Fractures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: National changes in health care disparities within the setting of trauma care have not been examined within Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or non-ACOs. We sought to examine the impact of ACOs on post-treatment outcomes (in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions), as well as surgical intervention among whites and nonwhites treated for spinal fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all beneficiaries treated for spinal fractures between 2009 and 2014 using national Medicare fee for service claims data. Claims were used to identify sociodemographic and clinical criteria, receipt of surgery and in-hospital mortality, 90-day complications, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for all confounders was used to determine the effect of race/ethnicity on outcomes. Nonwhites were compared with whites treated in non-ACOs between 2009 and 2011 as the referent. RESULTS: We identified 245,704 patients who were treated for spinal fractures. Two percent of the cohort received care in an ACO, whereas 7% were nonwhite. We found that disparities in the use of surgical fixation for spinal fractures were present in non-ACOs over the period 2009-2014 but did not exist in the context of care provided through ACOs (odds ratio [OR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44, 1.28). A disparity in the development of complications existed for nonwhites in non-ACOs (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.01, 1.17) that was not encountered among nonwhites receiving care in ACOs (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.90, 1.95). An existing disparity in readmission rates for nonwhites in ACOs over 2009-2011 (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.01, 1.80) was eliminated in the period 2012-2014 (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65, 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our work reinforces the idea that ACOs could improve health care disparities among nonwhites. There is also the potential that as ACOs become more familiar with care integration and streamlined delivery of services, further improvements in disparities could be realized.
Subject(s)
Accountable Care Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Fracture Fixation/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Accountable Care Organizations/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost Savings/economics , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity , Female , Fracture Fixation/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/organization & administration , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Medicare/economics , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Program Evaluation , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Fractures/economics , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) progressed from a virtually unknown procedure to one performed on hundreds of thousands of patients annually. The development of VP provides a historically exciting case study into a rapidly adopted procedure. VP was the synthesis of information gained from spinal biopsy developments, the inception of biomaterials used in medicine, and the unique health care climate in France during the 1980s. It was designed as a revolutionary technique to treat vertebral body fractures with minimal side effects and was rapidly adopted and marketed in the United States. The impact of percutaneous vertebroplasty on spine surgery was profound.
Subject(s)
Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Vertebroplasty/economics , Vertebroplasty/methods , Bone Cements/economics , Bone Cements/therapeutic use , Humans , Polymethyl Methacrylate/economics , Polymethyl Methacrylate/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and medial branch block (MBB) are used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF). We compared the clinical outcomes, radiologic changes, and economic results of MBB with those of VP in treating osteoporotic VCFs. METHODS: A total of 164 patients with 1-level osteoporotic VCF were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To compare economic costs between groups, total hospital costs at the last follow-up day were calculated. RESULTS: The patients were divided into 2 groups: 72 patients in the conservative group treated by MBB (MBB group) and 92 patients in the group who underwent VP (VP group). The VAS and ODI scores improved significantly within postoperative week 1 in the VP group compared with the MBB group. However, the VAS and ODI scores did not differ between the groups after 1 postoperative year. After 2 years of follow-up, 14 new fractures occurred in the VP group and 3 in the MBB group. The improvement in compression ratio was statistically greater in the VP group than in the MBB group. However, after 2 years the radiologic changes between groups did not differ statistically. After the final follow-up visits, the hospital costs were significantly lower in the MBB group. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years of follow-up, VP and MBB both had similar efficacy in terms of pain relief and radiologic changes. MBB was more cost effective than VP. Thus, MBB alone can be a possible alternative to VP in patients with 1-level osteoporotic VCFs.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression/therapy , Nerve Block , Osteoporotic Fractures/therapy , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Vertebroplasty , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Conservative Treatment/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Compression/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Compression/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/economics , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Vertebroplasty/economicsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A propensity score matching study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) in Japan. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a common disease in elderly people. In Japan, the incidence of painful OVF in 2008 was estimated as 880,000, and approximately 40% of patients with painful OVF are hospitalized due to the severity of pain. Japan is the front runner among super-aged societies and rising health care costs are an economic problem. METHODS: BKP and nonsurgical management (NSM) for acute/subacute OVF were performed in 116 and 420 cases, respectively. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and incremental costs were calculated on the basis of a propensity score matching study. QALY was evaluated using the SF-6D questionnaire. Finally, using a Markov model, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for 71 matched cases. RESULTS: In the comparison between BKP and NSM, mean patients age was 78.3 and 77.7 years, respectively (Pâ=â0.456). The BKP procedure cost 402,988 JPY more than NSM and the gains in QALY at the 6-month follow-up were 0.153 and 0.120, respectively (differenceâ=â0.033). ICERs for 3 and 20 years were 4,404,158 JPY and 2,416,406 JPY, respectively. According to sensitivity analysis, ICERs ranged from 652,181 JPY to 4,896,645 JPY (4418-33,168 GBP). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that BKP is a cost-effective treatment option for OVF in Japan. However, the effect might be blunted in patients aged > 80 years. Further research is necessary to elucidate the cost-effectiveness of BKP in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression/surgery , Kyphoplasty/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Fractures, Compression/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Japan , Kyphoplasty/methods , Male , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Spinal Fractures/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cervical spine (C-spine) injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality among elderly patients. Although the population of older-adults ≥65 years in the United States is expanding, estimates of the burden and outcome of C-spine injury are lacking. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2001-2010 was analyzed. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes identified patients with isolated C-spine fractures (ICF) and C-spine fractures with spinal cord injury (CSCI). Annual admission and mortality rates were calculated using U.S. Census data. RESULTS: A total of 167,278 older adults were included. Median age was 81 years (interquartile range = 74-86). Most patients were female (54.9%), had Medicare coverage (77.6%), were treated in teaching hospitals (63.2%), and had falls as the leading injury mechanism (51.2%). ICF occurred in 91.3%, whereas CSCI occurred in 8.7% (P < 0.001). ICF was more common in ≥85-year-old patients and CSCI in 65- to 69-year-old patients (P < 0.001). The most common injured C-spine level in ICF was the C2 level (47.6%, P < 0.001) and in CSCI was C1-C4 level (4.5%, P < 0.001). Overall, 15.8% underwent C-spine surgery. Hospitalization rates increased from 26/100,000 in 2001 to 68/100,000 in 2010 (â¼167% change, P < 0.001). Correspondingly, overall mortality increased from 3/100,000 in 2001 to 6/100,000 in 2010, P < 0.001. In-hospital mortality was 11.3%, was strongly associated with increasing age and CSCI (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In summary, C-spine fractures among U.S. older adults constitute a significant health care burden. ICFs occur commonly, C2-vertebra fractures are most frequent, whereas CSCIs are linked to increased hospital-resource use and worse outcomes. The incidence of C-spine fractures and mortality more than doubled over the past decade; however, proportional in-hospital mortality is decreasing.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Hospital Charges , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mortality/trends , Sex Distribution , Spinal Cord Injuries/economics , Spinal Cord Injuries/mortality , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/mortality , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Subaxial spinal injury surgery is expensive, and its significance is uncertain because of limited rehabilitation and postoperative care. OBJECTIVE: To assess complications and outcome in patients surgically treated for subaxial spinal injuries in 2 hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: Retrospective study, conducted among 85 patients operated on for subaxial spine injury from January 2013 to August 2016. Data were collected from medical charts. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included, and 20 patients were not followed up. The mean age was 33 years (standard deviation ± 12.03 years), and the mean time from injury to surgery was 10 days. The rates of surgical mortality and reoperation were 7.05% and 3.5%, respectively. Deaths occurred in 13 of 16 patients (81.1%) with American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) scores of A and in 3 of 16 patients (18.9%) with ASIA scores of B. The complication rate in patients with a preoperative ASIA score of A was 17/24 (70.8%). The study showed that 55 of 65 patients who were followed up (84.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.4, 92.3) experienced improvement. According to the patients' follow-up ASIA scores, 47 (72.3%; 95% CI: 61.5, 83.1) were functional. Sphincter tone before operation (adjusted odds ratio 142.82; 95% CI: 9.973, 204.090) was significantly associated with follow-up ASIA score. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with complete cervical injuries had high rates of mortality and morbidity, indicating that it might be better not to operate on these patients in resource-limited settings. There is a moderate recovery rate in patients with incomplete SCI despite a lack of adequate rehabilitation facilities.
Subject(s)
Health Resources/economics , Spinal Fractures/economics , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Adult , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Spinal Injuries/economics , Spinal Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Injuries/surgery , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traumatic spinal injuries are often associated with both long-term disability, higher frequency of hospital readmissions, and high medical costs for individuals of all ages. Age differences in terms of injury profile and health outcomes among those who sustain a spinal cord injury have been identified. However, factors that may influence health outcomes among those with a spinal injury have not been extensively examined at a population level. PURPOSE: The present study aims to describe the characteristics of traumatic spinal injury, identify factors predictive of mortality, and estimate the cost of hospital treatment for younger and older people. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a population-based retrospective epidemiological study using linked hospitalization and mortality records during January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2014 in New South Wales, Australia. PATIENT SAMPLE: The present study included 13,429 hospitalizations. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality within 30 and 90 days of hospitalization, hospital length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs were determined. METHODS: Hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of spinal cord injury or spinal fractures were used to identify traumatic spinal injuries. Age-standardized incidence rates were calculated and negative binomial regression was used to examine statistical significant changes over time. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine the effect of risk factors on survival at 90 days. RESULTS: There were 13,429 hospitalizations, with 52.4% of individuals aged ≥65 years. The hospitalization rates for individuals aged ≤64 and ≥65 years were both estimated to significantly increase per year by 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-5.79, p<.006) and 3.3% (95% CI 1.02-5.71, p=.005), respectively. For individuals aged ≥65 years, there were a higher proportion of women injured, comorbid conditions, injuries after a fall in the home or aged care facility, a longer hospital LOS, unplanned hospital admissions, and deaths than individual aged ≤64 years. The average cost per index hospitalization was AUD$23,808 for individuals aged ≤64 years and AUD$31,187 for individuals aged ≥65 years with a total estimated cost of AUD$371 million. Mortality risk at 90 days was increased for individuals who had one or more comorbidities, a higher injury severity score, and if their injury occurred in the home or an aged care facility. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal injury represents a substantial cost and results in debilitating injuries, particularly for older individuals. Spinal injury prevention efforts for older people should focus on the implementation of fall injury prevention, whereas for younger individuals, prevention measures should target road safety.