Expert Consensus for Early Onset Scoliosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite a validated classification system, high-quality multicenter research databases (CSSG/GSSG), and a recent proliferation in publications, early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgeons have no consensus on standards for surgical treatment. The 21st-century revolution in EOS care has only accelerated, with the arrival of a classification system, magnetically controlled growing rod, nusinersen, and improved nonoperative care (Mehta or Risser casting and compliance-monitored braces). This dizzying pace of change may have outstripped our ability to develop best-practice standards for EOS surgical indications. To learn where consensus is best (and worst) at this moment, we surveyed EOS world thought-leaders on a collection of representative cases. METHODS: A 6-case survey was constructed and sent to 20 EOS world thought-leaders. The cases were selected to be representative of the major treatment categories: idiopathic, neuromuscular, syndromic, congenital, thoracic dysplasia, and spinal muscular atrophy (specifically to assess the impact of nusinersen and parasol deformity on surgical planning). Respondents were queried regarding treatment with specific attention to instrumentation and construct when surgery was selected. Responses regarding surgical timing and technique were analyzed for consensus (defined as >80%). χ analysis was performed to evaluate for differences in treatment preferences based on years of experience. RESULTS: The survey response was 100%. Clinical experience ranged from 8 to 40 years (average 23.9 y). There was no consensus on any case. The greatest variability was on the congenital case; the closest to consensus was on the spinal muscular atrophy case. Three or more approaches were selected for all 6 cases; >4 approaches were selected for 5 cases. There is a trend towards screw fixation for proximal anchors. The management of thoracic dysplasia and parasol deformity is far from consensus. CONCLUSION: The lack of consensus for surgical treatment of 6 representative EOS cases demands a renewed effort and commitment to develop best-practice guidelines based on multicenter outcome data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-Expert Opinion.

Performing a Definitive Fusion in Juvenile CP Patients is a Good Surgical Option.

BACKGROUND: In juveniles with progressive curves, there is debate regarding the use of growth friendly implants versus definitive fusion. This study presents outcomes of juvenile cerebral palsy (CP) scoliosis patients who underwent definitive fusion before age 11. METHODS: A review of a prospective, multicenter registry identified patients 10 years and younger who had a definitive posterior fusion for their CP scoliosis. Preoperative and postoperative demographic and radiographic changes were evaluated with descriptive statistics. Repeated measures analysis of variance were utilized to compare outcome scores. RESULTS: Fourteen children with a mean age of 9.7 years (8.3 to 10.8 y) and a minimum of 2 years follow-up (range 2 to 3 y) were identified. The mean preoperative curve magnitude and pelvic obliquity was 84±25 degrees (range 63 to 144 degrees) and 25±14 degrees, respectively. All patients were skeletally immature with open triradiate cartilage. Three patients had unit rods with wires while the rest incorporated pedicle screws. Immediately postoperation, the average major curve was 25±17 degrees (P≤0.001, 71% correction rate). At most recent follow-up, the average major curve increased to 30±18 degrees (P≤0.001) for a 65% correction rate. Pelvic obliquity improved to 4±4 degrees (84% correction, P≤0.001) immediately postoperation and to 6±5 degrees (P=0.002) at latest follow-up for a 76% correction rate. None of the patients required revision surgery for progression. From pre to most recent follow-up, the CPchild Health outcome scores improved from 47 to 58 (P=0.019). One patient had a deep infection, and 1 patient had a broken rod that did not require any further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive scoliosis in juvenile CP patients requires the surgeon to balance the need for further growth with the risks of progression or repeated surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that definitive fusion once the curves approach 90 degrees results in significant radiographic and quality of life improvements, but further follow-up is needed to determine whether those results remain after skeletal maturity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Polyetheretherketone interbody cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts with anterior fixation for cervical disc disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the fusion rate, operation time, recovery of disc space height, clinical duration and improvement, return to activities of daily living, and complication rate associated with anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion by using polyetheretherketone cages or autogenous iliac crest bone grafts as disc replacement in a series of 60 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2006 and February 2010 a retrospective analytical observational cohort study was carried out in 60 consecutive patients surgically treated with anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion for degenerative disc desease at the Neurosurgical Department of the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. The patients were divided into 2 groups for the assessment of clinical characteristics, demographics, fusion rates, duration of surgical procedure, neurological and functional outcomes, imaging results, and complications. Group A included patients treated with autogenous iliac crest bone grafts, and group B included patients treated with polyetheretherketone cages. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 50.8 years. Female patients comprised the majority in both groups (63.3%). Cervicobrachialgia was the most common presentation. Clinical improvement, fusion rates, and recovery of disc space height were similar in both groups. The operation time was significantly shorter in the polyetheretherketone group (P<0.001). Twenty percent (n=6) of the patients in group A suffered complications, >80% of which were associated with iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Patients in group B had no complications (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although outcomes were very successful in both groups in terms of fixation stability, recovery of disc space, return to activities of daily living and work, and remission of symptoms, operation time was considerably shorter for patients in the polyetheretherketone group, who had none of the complications associated with iliac crest bone graft harvesting, both differences being statistically significant.