Are Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Influenced by Presurgical Depression Symptoms on the Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Survey?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preoperative depressive symptoms, measured by mental component score of the Short Form-12 survey (MCS-12), influence patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for cervical degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a paucity of literature regarding preoperative depression and PROMs following ACDF surgery for cervical degenerative disease. METHODS: Patients who underwent an ACDF for degenerative cervical pathology were identified. A score of 45.6 on the MCS-12 was used as the threshold for depression symptoms, and patients were divided into two groups based on this value: depression (MCS-12 ≤45.6) and nondepression (MCS-12 >45.6) groups. Outcomes including Neck Disability Index (NDI), physical component score of the Short Form-12 survey (PCS-12), and Visual Analogue Scale Neck (VAS Neck), and Arm (VAS Arm) pain scores were evaluated using independent sample t test, recovery ratios, percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference, and multiple linear regression - controlling for factors such as age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS: The depression group was found to have significantly worse baseline pain and disability than the nondepression group in NDI (P < 0.001), VAS Neck pain (P < 0.001), and VAS Arm pain (P < 0.001) scores. Postoperatively, both groups improved to a similar amount with surgery based on the recovery ratio analysis. The depression group continued to have worse scores than the nondepression group in NDI (P = 0.010), PCS-12 (P = 0.026), and VAS Arm pain (P = 0.001) scores. Depression was not a significant predictor of change in any PROMs based on regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients who presented with preoperative depression reported more pain and disability symptoms preoperatively and postoperatively; however, both groups achieved similar degrees of improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Curve Modulation and Apex Migration Using Shilla Growth Guidance Rods for Early-onset Scoliosis at 5-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The Shilla procedure was designed to correct and control early-onset spinal deformity while harnessing a child's remaining spinal growth. It allows for controlled axial skeletal growth within the construct, avoiding the need for frequent surgeries to lengthen implants. We hypothesized that curve characteristics evolve over time after initial apex fusion and placement of the Shilla implants. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in curve evolution after Shilla implantation and understand how these changes influence ultimate outcome. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of all patients with Shilla implants in place for ≥5 years yielded 21 patients. Charts and radiographs were reviewed to compare coronal curve characteristics preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up to note changes in the apex of the primary curve. Also noted were the development of adjacent compensatory curves, the overall vertical spinal growth, and the need for definitive spinal fusion once skeletal maturity was reached. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients, the curve apex migrated caudally in 12 patients (57%) and cephalad in 1 patient (5%), with a mean migration of 2.7 vertebral levels. Two patients (10%) developed new, significant compensatory curves (1 caudal and 1 cephalad). All patients demonstrated spinal growth in T1-S1 length following index surgery (mean, 45 mm). At skeletal maturity, 10 patients underwent definitive posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation, and 3 underwent implant removal alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study constitutes the longest follow-up of Shilla patients evaluating curve and implant behavior. Results of this review suggest that the apex of the fused primary curve shifts in approximately 62% of patients, with nearly all of these (92%) involving a distal migration. Compensatory curves did develop after Shilla placement as well. Overall, these findings represent adding-on distal to the apex after Shilla instrumentation rather than a crankshaft phenomenon about the apex. A better understanding of spinal growth mechanics and outcomes after Shilla placement may improve our ability to appropriately select patients and instrumentation levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparison of Short-term Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion Between an Orthopedic Specialty Hospital and Tertiary Referral Center.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of all elective single-level lumbar fusions performed at a single orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and tertiary referral center (TRC). OBJECTIVE: This study compared the perioperative outcomes for lumbar fusion procedures performed at an OSH and TRC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The role of an OSH for lumbar fusion procedures has not been defined. METHODS: A large institutional database was searched for single-level lumbar fusions performed between 2013 and 2016. Comparisons were made between procedures performed at the OSH and TRC in terms of operative time, total operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), inpatient rehabilitation utilization, postoperative 90-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients at the OSH and 481 at the TRC were included. There was no difference in gender, age, age adjusted Charlson comorbidity Index (AACCI), body mass index, mean number of concomitant levels decompressed, and use of interbody fusion between OSH and TRC patients. The mean operative time (149.5 vs. 179.7 minutes, P < 0.001), total OR time (195.1 vs. 247.9 minutes, P < 0.001), and postoperative LOS (2.61 vs. 3.73 days, P < 0.001) were significantly shorter at the OSH. More patients required postoperative inpatient rehabilitation at the TRC (7.1% vs. 2%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in 90-day readmission or reoperation rates. There was one mortality at the TRC and two patients required transfer from the OSH to the TRC due to medical complications. Regression analysis demonstrated that procedures performed at the TRC (P < 0.001), total OR time (P = 0.004), AACCI (P < 0.001), current smokers (P = 0.048), and number of decompressed levels (P = 0.032) were independent predictors of LOS. CONCLUSION: Lumbar fusion procedures may be safely performed at both the OSH and TRC. OSH utilization may demonstrate safe reduction in operative time, total OR time, and postoperative LOS in the appropriately selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Longer Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Negatively Affects Health-related Quality of Life After Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Determine the effect of duration of symptoms (DOS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for patients with cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effect of DOS has not been extensively evaluated for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an anterior cervical decompression and fusion for radiculopathy was performed. Patients were grouped based on DOS of less than 6 months, 6 months to 2 years, and more than 2 years and HRQOL outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 16.0 months. There were 86, 61, and 69 patients with symptoms for less than 6 months, 6 months to 2 years, and more than 2 years, respectively. No difference in the absolute postoperative score of the patient reported outcomes was identified between the cohorts. However, in the multivariate analysis, radiculopathy for more than 2 years predicted lower postoperative Short Form-12 Physical Component Score (P = 0.037) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Score (P = 0.029), and higher postoperative Neck Disability Index (P = 0.003), neck pain (P = 0.001), and arm pain (P = 0.004) than radiculopathy for less than 6 months. Furthermore, the recovery ratios for patients with symptoms for less than 6 months demonstrated a greater improvement in NDI, neck pain, and arm pain than for 6 months to 2 years (P = 0.041; 0.005; 0.044) and more than 2 years (P = 0.016; 0.014; 0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients benefit from spine surgery for cervical radiculopathy at all time points, and the absolute postoperative score for the patient reported outcomes did not vary based on the duration of symptoms; however, the regression analysis clearly identified symptoms for more than 2 years as a predictor of worse outcomes, and the recovery ratio was statistically significantly improved in patients who underwent surgery within 6 months of the onset of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Tratamiento quirúrgico de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente. Resultados en el Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación de México. Seguimiento mínimo de 24 meses]. / Idiopathic scoliosis's surgical treatment. Results in Mexico's National Rehabilitation Institute. 24 months follow.

ANTECEDENTES: La escoliosis idiopática del adolescente se define como una deformidad tridimensional de la columna vertebral que se presenta entre los 10 y los 18 años, y que se manifiesta con una curvatura vertebral en el plano coronal mayor de 10°. Esta deformidad afecta al 2-3% de la población general, pero solo el 10% del total requerirá en algún momento tratamiento quirúrgico. El método de elección para el manejo es el uso de tornillos transpediculares y barras desrotadoras. OBJETIVO: Realizar un análisis descriptivo de los pacientes que recibieron manejo quirúrgico en nuestro instituto con tornillos transpediculares y barras. MÉTODO: Se trata de un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, analítico, abierto, de muestreo no probabilístico, en el que se incluyeron los pacientes tratados con manejo quirúrgico entre 2012 y 2013. Las deformidades se estratificaron de acuerdo con la clasificación de Lenke. El ángulo de corrección de la deformidad, los niveles instrumentados, el sangrado transquirúrgico y la presencia de complicaciones fueron las variables analizadas. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron curvas Lenke IBN, Nash Moe III, Cobb un promedio de 59.4° y cifosis de 47.8. En promedio se siguió a los pacientes por 35.84 meses, detectando un aumento de la curvatura coronal de 2.28° y un aumento de la curvatura sagital de 2.8°. CONCLUSIÓN: Al comparar estos resultados y la literatura mundial se concluyó que el tratamiento de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente es un método seguro y reproducible que ofrece una mayor ventaja biomecánica y biológica sobre el uso de instrumentación mixta utilizada anteriormente. BACKGROUND: Adolescent's idiopathic scoliosis is defined as a three-dimensional deformity of the spine, which occurs between 10 and 18-year-old, has a spinal curvature >10° in the coronal plane. This deformity affects 2­3% of the general population, however, only 10% of the total will require surgery at some point. The method of choice for management is the use of pedicle screws and rods derotational. OBJECTIVE: To perform a descriptive analysis of patients who received surgical treatment in our institute with pedicle screws and rods. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, analytical, open study, non-probability sampling, in which patients requiring surgical treatment at our institute between 2012 and 2013 were included, the deformities were stratified according to the classification of Lenke. The angle of deformity correction, instrumented levels, amount of bleeding, presence of complications were the variables analyzed. RESULTS: Lenke classifying mostly IBN, Moe Nash III, an average of 59.4° Cobb and kyphosis of 47.8. On average it was followed patients for 35.84 months, detecting an increase 2.28° coronal curvature and sagittal curvature increase of 2.8°. CONCLUSION: Comparing these results and world literature concluded that the treatment of adolescent's idiopathic scoliosis is a safe and reproducible method that provides greater biomechanical and biological advantage over the use of mixed instrumentation used previously.

Variation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: Implications for Improving Healthcare Value.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the variation in care and cost of spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify opportunities for improving healthcare value. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database, including children 11-18 years of age with AIS who underwent spinal fusion surgery between 2004 and 2015. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationships between hospital cost, patient outcomes, and resource use. RESULTS: There were 16 992 cases of AIS surgery identified. There was marked variation across hospitals in rates of intensive care unit admission (0.5%-99.2%), blood transfusions (0%-100%), surgical complications (1.8%-32.3%), and total hospital costs ($31 278-$90 379). Hospital cost was 32% higher at hospitals that most frequently admitted patients to the intensive care unit (P = .009), and 8% higher for each additional 25 operative cases per hospital (P = .003). Hospital duration of stay was shorter for patients admitted to hospitals with highest intensive care unit admission rates and higher surgical volumes. There was no association between cost and duration of stay, 30-day readmission, or surgical complications. The largest contribution to hospital charges was supplies (55%). Review of a single hospital's detailed cost accounting system also found supplies to be the greatest single contributor to cost, the majority of which were for spinal implants, accounting for 39% of total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest contribution to AIS surgery cost was supplies, the majority of which is likely attributed to spinal implant costs. Opportunities for improving healthcare value should focus on controlling costs of spinal instrumentation, and improving quality of care with standardized treatment protocols.

Comparing the Treatment Algorithm and Complications for Patients Undergoing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at a Physician-Owned Specialty Hospital and a University-Owned Tertiary Care Hospital.

The purpose of this case-control study is to compare the treatment algorithm and complication rate for patients who undergo an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at a physician-owned specialty hospital to those who undergo surgery at a university-owned tertiary care hospital. Two controls were identified for 77 patients, and no differences in demographic data were identified. The median time between the onset of symptoms and surgery was shorter for patients who had surgery at the tertiary care center than for patients who had surgery at the specialty hospital (26.7 weeks vs 32.7 weeks, P = .0004). Furthermore, a higher percentage of patients who had surgery at the specialty hospital attempted nonoperative treatments than patients who underwent surgery at the tertiary care hospital.

A Review of Minimally Invasive Procedures for the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature evaluating the role of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques in the operative treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MIS techniques have become important tools in the armamentarium of spinal deformity surgeons as a means of achieving coronal and sagittal plane correction, while minimizing the complications of open deformity surgery. The literature suggests that MIS techniques are associated with certain limitations, and to date, determining which patients are candidates for MIS deformity correction is largely based on surgeon experience. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed-National Library of Medicine/National Institute of Health databases. All studies describing the use of MIS techniques in ASD surgery were included for review. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles were included in the review. All studies were specifically designed to demonstrate radiographic and clinical outcomes of MIS techniques. Thirty articles were specific to MIS techniques as they relate to ASD surgery, whereas six articles were designed to describe details of various MIS techniques, and three articles were related to general principles of corrective surgery for ASD. CONCLUSION: The literature has demonstrated that MIS techniques are effective in achieving radiographic correction after surgery for ASD, while reducing complications compared with traditional open surgery. However, MIS techniques have limitations and may not be as effective as open surgery for severe and/or fixed sagittal and coronal plane deformity. Therefore, selecting patients for stand-alone MIS versus circumferential (cMIS) versus hybrid MIS (hybMIS) is critically important. The MIS spinal deformity surgery algorithm was designed to address this topic. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role and limitations of MIS techniques in patient undergoing corrective surgery for ASD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Preservation or Restoration of Segmental and Regional Spinal Lordosis Using Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Conditions: A Literature Review.

STUDY DESIGN: A literature review. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review lumbar segmental and regional alignment changes following treatment with a variety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) interbody fusion procedures for short-segment, degenerative conditions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An increasing number of lumbar fusions are being performed with minimally invasive exposures, despite a perception that minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedures are unable to affect segmental and regional lordosis. METHODS: Through a MEDLINE and Google Scholar search, a total of 23 articles were identified that reported alignment following minimally invasive lumbar fusion for degenerative (nondeformity) lumbar spinal conditions to examine aggregate changes in postoperative alignment. RESULTS: Of the 23 studies identified, 28 study cohorts were included in the analysis. Procedural cohorts included MIS ALIF (two), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) (16), and MIS posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF) (11). Across 19 study cohorts and 720 patients, weighted average of lumbar lordosis preoperatively for all procedures was 43.5° (range 28.4°-52.5°) and increased 3.4° (9%) (range -2° to 7.4°) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis increased, on average, by 4° from a weighted average of 8.3° preoperatively (range -0.8° to 15.8°) to 11.2° at postoperative time points (range -0.2° to 22.8°) (P < 0.001) in 1182 patient from 24 study cohorts. Simple linear regression revealed a significant relationship between preoperative lumbar lordosis and change in lumbar lordosis (r = 0.413; P = 0.003), wherein lower preoperative lumbar lordosis predicted a greater increase in postoperative lumbar lordosis. CONCLUSION: Significant gains in both weighted average lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis were seen following MIS interbody fusion. None of the segmental lordosis cohorts and only two of the 19 lumbar lordosis cohorts showed decreases in lordosis postoperatively. These results suggest that MIS approaches are able to impact regional and local segmental alignment and that preoperative patient factors can impact the extent of correction gained (preserving vs. restoring alignment). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The revision rate and occurrence of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 672 consecutive patients.

LEVEL III: retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of revision surgery and the occurrence of adjacent segment disease of patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy using more modern-day instrumentation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been the preferred treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACDF between January of 2000 and December of 2010 were included. Age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, symptoms at presentation, number of levels fused, graft type, and smoking status were recorded. Outcomes included revision rate, reason for revision surgery, time to revision surgery, presence and grade of adjacent segment disease, distance from the instrumentation to the cranial and caudal endplate (plate-to-disc distance), and reporting of symptoms of adjacent segment disease at the final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were included in this study. The average duration of follow-up was 31 months. One hundred one (15%) patients underwent revision surgery. The reason for revision surgery was adjacent segment disease in 47 (47.5%), pseudarthrosis in 45 (45.5%) and a new problem at a nonadjacent level in 7 (7.1%) of those patients. The need for revision surgery was not affected by patient age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, symptoms at presentation, number of levels fused, plate-to-disc distance or graft type. CONCLUSION: The revision rate after ACDF is 15%. Most revisions were done for either adjacent segment disease or pseudarthrosis. No specific risk factors for revision surgery were identified in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

National trends in the use of fusion techniques to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: (1) To describe change in treatment patterns for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). (2) To report regional variation in treatment of DS. (3) To describe variation in surgeon-reported outcomes for DS based on treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal stenosis associated with DS is commonly treated with decompression and fusion but little is known about the optimal fusion technique. During a 6-month period, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery step II candidates submit procedure lists; these lists have been stored in an electronic database since 1999. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was retrospectively queried to identify patients who underwent surgery for DS from 1999 to 2011. Included patients underwent uninstrumented fusion, fusion with posterior instrumentation, fusion using interbody device, or decompression without fusion. Utilization of these procedures was analyzed by year and geographic region. RESULTS: The study period included 5639 cases; the annual number of cases doubled during the study period. The percentage of cases treated with interbody fusion (IF) increased significantly throughout the study period, from 13.6% (1999-2001) to 32% (2009-2011) (P<0.001). The percentage of DS cases treated with posterolateral fusion peaked in 2003 then decreased as the rate of IF increased. In 2011, the rates of posterolateral fusion (40%) and posterolateral fusion with IF (37%) were nearly identical. The Northwest had the highest rate of IF (41%), >10% higher than any other region (P<0.001) and more than 23% higher than the Southeast (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite little evidence guiding treatment strategy for DS, national treatment patterns have changed dramatically during the past 13 years. The rapid adoption of IF and substantial regional variation in treatment utilization patterns raises questions about drivers of change including perceptions about associated fusion rates, the importance of sagittal balance and differential reimbursement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Clostridium difficile colitis in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate incidence, comorbidities, and impact on health care resources of Clostridium difficile infection after lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: C. difficile colitis is reportedly increasing in hospitalized patients and can have a negative impact on patient outcomes. No data exist on estimates of C. difficile infection rates and its consequences on patient outcomes and health care resources among patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was examined from 2002 to 2011. Patients were included for study based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, procedural codes for lumbar spine surgery for degenerative diagnoses. Baseline patient characteristics were determined and multivariable analyses assessed factors associated with increased incidence of C. difficile and risk of mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of C. difficile infection in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery is 0.11%. At baseline, patients infected with C. difficile were significantly older (65.4 yr vs. 58.9 yr, P<0.0001) and more likely to have diabetes with chronic complications, neurological complications, congestive heart failure, pulmonary disorders, coagulopathy, and renal failure. Lumbar fusion (P=0.0001) and lumbar fusion revision (P=0.0003) were associated with increased odds of postoperative infection. Small hospital size was associated with decreased odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; P<0.001), whereas urban hospitals were associated with increased odds (OR, 2.14; P<0.14) of acquiring infection. Uninsured (OR, 1.62; P<0.0001) and patients with Medicaid (OR, 1.33; P<0.0001) were associated with higher odds of acquiring postoperative infection. C. difficile increased hospital length of stay by 8 days (P<0.0001), hospital charges by 2-fold (P<0.0001), and inpatient mortality to 4% from 0.11% (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: C. difficile infection after lumbar spine surgery carries a 36.4-fold increase in mortality and costs approximately $10,658,646 per year to manage. These data suggest that great care should be taken to avoid C. difficile colitis in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery because it is associated with longer hospital stays, greater overall costs, and increased inpatient mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Functional results of surgery for cervical stenosis]. / Resultados funcionales de la cirugía del conducto cervical estrecho.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical stenosis refers to the narrowing of the spinal canal or the intervertebral foramina at different anatomic levels, secondary to pathologic processes of the vertebral elements. Surgical management is used when conservative management fails. The anterior and posterior approaches are the most frequently used ones, and the surgical options resulting from these approaches are: anterior cervical diskectomy plus fusion, anterior corporectomy plus fusion, laminoplasty, laminectomy and arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is an ambispective study conducted in 195 patients with a diagnosis of cervical stenosis who required surgical treatment at our hospital from January 1995 to January 2007. The neck disability index questionnaire was applied, as well as the Nurick scale. Descriptive statistics was used with frequency and percentage measures. RESULTS: The review of the National Rehabilitation Institute electronic records from January 1st 1995 to December 31st 2007 showed that 195 patients underwent surgery for cervical stenosis. Females were predominant. The most affected age group was 46-55 years. The most frequently affected level was C5-C6. A significant improvement was seen in the neck disability index due to pain and the Nurick scale. CONCLUSION: According to world literature, mean age of patients with cervical stenosis is 57.2 years, and the most compromised levels were C4-C5 and C5-C6. Improvement was evident according to the neck disability index and the Nurick scale.

A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration.

OBJECT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion had been considered a safe and effective procedure for radiculopathy and myelopathy in the cervical spine, but degeneration in adjacent spinal levels has been a problem in some patients after fusion. Since 2002, cervical disc arthroplasty has been established as an alternative to fusion. The objective of this study was to review data concerning the role of cervical arthroplasty in reducing adjacent-level degeneration. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and LILACS databases, focusing on a structured question involving the population of interest, types of intervention, types of control, and outcomes studied. RESULTS: No study has specifically compared the results of arthroplasty with the results of fusion with respect to the rate of postoperative development of adjacent-segment degenerative disease. One paper described a rate for adjacent-level surgery. The level of evidence of that paper was classified 2b, and although its authors found a statistically significant between-groups difference (arthroplasty vs fusion) using log-rank analysis, re-analysis according to number needed to treat (in the current paper) did not reveal statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Adjacent-level degeneration has not been adequately studied in a review of the available randomized controlled trials on this topic, and there is no clinical evidence of reduction in adjacent-level degeneration with the use of cervical arthroplasty.

[Surgical treatment for scoliosis. Minimal evolution control at 5 years]. / Tratamiento quirúrgico de la escoliosis. Control de evolución mínimo de 5 años.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this study to determine the surgical treatments results performed often to correct scoliosis in the Spinal Surgery Service in the INR/Orthopedics (National Institute of Rehabilitation/Orthopedics), Mexico City. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, descriptive, and clinical study with a deliberated intervention controlled from a historical cohort. One hundred twenty patients with scoliosis were reviewed in whom surgery was performed during 1990-1999. For quantitative variables, pre- vs. postoperative measures were compared using non-parametric means with chi(2) or in this case with ANOVA by Kruskall-Wallis test. Differences are considered significant if p <0.05. RESULTS: Age average of patients was 12 years. There were 75 females and 45 males. There were 59 idiopathic scoliosis cases and 54 congenital scoliosis cases. Anterior approach was accomplished in 61 cases with posterior fixation. Posterior approach was used in 54 cases. There were 76 cases of Luque segmental instrumentation. Pre-operatively, scoliosis was ranked (18 to 110 grades) and postoperatively (5 to 90 grades) (p = 0.00001). There were 21 complications, 9 due to injuries or infection. In 76 patients, different fixation techniques were used, obtaining a correction average of 14.47 grades. Forty four patients were structured with bars, four distal screws, two compression screws, proximal hooks with sublaminar wire, and the angle was reduced on average 23.11 grades. CONCLUSIONS. Average reduction of scoliosis was higher with the modified Luque III instrumentation (p <0.045). There was no difference between etiology and preoperative angle.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion.

BACKGROUND: Fifty-one patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) treated by anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACWF) at our institution were included in a study during a period of 10 years to evaluate neurological, anatomical, and functional outcomes including satisfaction levels. METHODS: We have completed a prospective evaluation of 39 patients with spondylotic myelopathy submitted to ACWF during the period of 1989-2000. The data were analyzed for age, duration of symptoms, severity of preoperative neurological deficit, and single-level or multilevel compressive status looking for possible association with prognostic surrogate data and clinical outcome that were evaluated with the Nurick score and a survey of level of satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients, 39 fullfilled the intended follow-up being 28 men (71.8%) and 11 women (28.2%). The average age was 63.5 years. Duration of symptoms ranged from 1 to 240 months (mean, 38.1 months). The mean preoperative Nurick scale score was 2.97; the mean postoperative score was 2.1. The most frequently involved vertebral body was C5 (71.7%). The follow-up period was longer than 18 months for all patients. Postoperative nonneurological complications occurred in 8 patients (15.6%). The mortality rate was 1.9% (n = 1). Postoperative results showed improvement in 25 patients (64.1%), no change in 13 (33.3%), and worsening in 1 (2.6%). The correlation coefficient of preoperative and postoperative Nurick scores was 0.733 (R(2) = 0.53). Of the 39 patients, 31 answered the questionnaire for quality of life-19 (61.2%) were very satisfied, 6 were satisfied (19.35%), and 6 were not satisfied (19.35%). CONCLUSION: Most patients (80.6%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome and would decide again for the surgery (87%) if the results were previously known. Anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion was a reliable and rewarding procedure for CSM, with functional improvement in most patients. Excellent long-term outcome results in cervical fusion can be achieved without the use of hardware instrumentation.