ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare 12-month spinal fusion surgery rates in the setting of low back pain among digital musculoskeletal (MSK) program participants versus a comparison cohort who only received usual care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matched comparison cohort using commercial medical claims data representing over 100 million commercially insured lives. METHODS: All study subjects experienced low back pain between January 2020 and December 2021. Digital MSK participants enrolled in the digital MSK low back program between January 2020 and December 2021. Non-participants had low back pain related physical therapy (PT) between January 2020 and December 2021. Digital MSK participants were matched to non-participants with similar demographics, comorbidities and baseline MSK-related medical care use. Spinal fusion surgery rates at 12 months post participation were compared. RESULTS: Compared to non-participants, digital MSK participants had lower rates of spinal fusion surgery in the post-period (0.7% versus 1.6%; p < 0.001). Additionally, in the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) model, digital MSK participants were found to have decreased odds of undergoing spinal fusion surgery (adjusted odds ratio: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that participation in a digital MSK program is associated with a lower rate of spinal fusion surgery.
Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Fusion/trends , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Male , Female , Low Back Pain/surgery , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Treatment Outcome , Physical Therapy Modalities/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Modalities/trendsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis is often a challenging and extensive procedure. Due to this complexity and the high disease burden that these patients carry, per and post-operative complications are not uncommon. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and describe the pooled rates of postoperative complications and analyze risk factors for complications in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery described in the literature in the last ten years. METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature across multiple databases was conducted using search criteria (neuromuscular scoliosis AND complications) and using PRISMA guidelines (Jan 2012-July 2022). Studies with less than 30 patients and follow-up of < 2 years were excluded. Data extraction and meta-analysis were performed using random mode effect. Statistical analysis was conducted using OpenMeta software. Meta-regression analysis was used to detect risk factors (surgical approach, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative Cobb angle and patient diagnosis) associated with each complication group. Confidence interval (CI) was set at 95%. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria involving 2155 patients. The level of evidence among studies were III (9) and IV (13). The most common primary diagnosis was cerebral palsy (43%) followed by Duchenne muscle dystrophy (20%), myelomeningocele (7.4%), spinal muscle atrophy (7.1%), Rett syndrome (< 2%) and combined other pathologies (20.2%). The pooled incidence rate of wound complications was the highest, amongst all complications, at 13.3% (CI 10.838 to 16.861); closely followed by respiratory complications (11.8%;CI 5.7 to 19.7). Implant failure occurred in 7.1% cases (CI 6.418 to 11.465), gastrointestinal complications was 5.2%; CI 2.4 to 8), pseudarthrosis in (4.6%;CI 2.2 to 6.9) and neurological deficit in 2.9% (CI 1.989 to 6.086). The pooled rate of revision surgery was (9.6%; CI 6.2 to 12.9). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test which results were moderately heterogeneous. Meta-regression analysis revealed that the diagnosis of myelomeningocele or Duchenne muscle dystrophy or spinal muscle atrophy were strongly associated with wound and respiratory complications (p = 0.007 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Wound-related (13.3%) and respiratory complications (11.8%) remain the most common complications among studies after corrective surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis. Both are significantly associated with Duchenne muscle dystrophy, spinal muscle atrophy and myelomeningocele.
Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Scoliosis , Humans , Scoliosis/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Neuromuscular Diseases/surgery , Neuromuscular Diseases/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/trends , Spinal Fusion/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) is an increasingly popular minimally-invasive spine procedure. This study identifies notable trends in LIF literature and provides a detailed review of the bibliometric aspects of the top 100 most-cited articles. METHODS: Articles were queried from the Web of Science database. Inclusion criteria consisted of peer-reviewed articles, full-text availability, and LIF focus. Network analysis including co-authorship mapping and bibliographic coupling were complemented by trend analysis to determine prominent contributors and themes. Analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix (RStudio). RESULTS: There has been a rapid increase in LIF publication and citation count since 1998. Leading journals were Spine (n = 24), Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (n = 22), and European Spine Journal (n = 12). NuVasive funded the most publications (n = 17), followed by DePuy Synthes Spine (n = 4). The United States was the most represented country (n = 81); however, trend analysis suggests a steadily growing international contribution. The most prolific author was J.S. Uribe (n = 16), followed by a tie in second place by E. Dakwar and L. Pimenta (n = 8). The most frequent keywords, "complication" (n = 34), "surgery" (n = 30), and "outcomes" (n = 24), demonstrated a patient-centric theme. CONCLUSIONS: This bibliometric analysis provides in-depth insights into the evolution and trends of LIF over the last two decades. The trends and themes identified demonstrate the innovative, collaborative, and patient-focused characteristics of this subfield. Future researchers can use this as a foundation for understanding the past and present state of LIF research while designing investigations.
Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trendsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the fusion rates of spinal interbody fusion in patients with modic changes (MCs). METHODS: This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, and the project number was CRD42024538023. This network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 28, 2024 for potential studies. STATA 13.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies with a total of 1162 patients or segments assigned to four groups according to MCs grade were identified. The fusion rate in the non-modic changes (NMCs) was significantly greater than that in the MCs at the 3-month (p = 0.0001) and 6-month (p = 0.002) follow-ups. No significant difference was detected in the fusion rate at 12-month (p = 0.34) and final follow-ups (p = 0.41). No significant difference was found in cervical fusion (p = 0.88) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (p = 0.51). The fusion rate of NMCs was significantly greater than that of MCs in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were identified among the four groups in the overall comparison, cervical fusion or TLIF subgroups. The fusion rate in the NMCs was significantly greater than that in the MCs-2 and MCs-3 in the PLIF. CONCLUSION: MCs decreased the fusion rate at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. MCs-2 and MCs-3 decrease the fusion rate in PLIF.
Subject(s)
Network Meta-Analysis , Spinal Fusion , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Fusions for lumbar spine diseases are widely performed and have a growing incidence, especially in elderly population. PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess national trends of lumbar spinal fusions and examine the risk for reoperations after a lumbar fusion with a focus on 'epidemiologic transition' relating to age. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: The prospectively collected Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) nationwide cohort database was retrospectively reviewed. PATIENT SAMPLE: The total 278,815 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusions for degenerative spine diseases between 2010 and 2018 were reviewed and used to assess trends in operative incidence. The 37,050 patients who underwent lumbar fusions between 1/2010 and 12/2011 were enrolled to determine 8-year reoperation rates. OUTCOME MEASURES: The overall number of lumbar spinal fusions were analyzed for the national annual trend. Demographic data, reoperation rates, and confounding clinical factors were evaluated. METHODS: The overall number of lumbar spinal fusions was analyzed to determine the national annual trend of operative incidence. For the reoperation rate analysis, the primary outcome measured was the cumulative incidence of revision operations within a minimum 8-year follow-up period. Additional outcomes included comparative analyses of the reoperation rate with respect to age, sex, or other underlying comorbidities. RESULTS: Over time, elderly patients comprised a larger portion of the cohort (2010:24.2%; 2018:37.6%), while operations in younger patients decreased over time (2010:40.3%; 2018:27.0%). In the cohort of patients with a minimum 8-year follow-up (n=37,050), rates of reoperation peaked in patients aged 60-69 years (17.6 per 1000 person-years [HR 2.20 compared to <40years]) and decreased for more elderly patients (14.3 per 1000 person-years [HR 1.80 compared to <40years]). Age was the most significant risk factor for reoperation. Osteoporosis was also a risk factor for reoperation in postmenopausal females. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing incidence of lumbar fusions in elderly patients was seen however the risk of reoperation decreased in patients aged 70 or more. Lumbar fusion for elderly patients should not be hesitated in the decision-making process because of concerns about reoperation.
Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae , Reoperation , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Fusion/trends , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Female , Male , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aging , Aged, 80 and over , Incidence , Age FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are commonly performed operations to address cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Trends in utilization and revision surgery rates warrant investigation. PURPOSE: To explore the epidemiology, postoperative complications, and reoperation rates of ACDF and CDA. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 433,660 patients who underwent ACDF or CDA between 2011 and 2021 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, complications, and revisions. METHODS: The PearlDiver database was queried to identify patients who underwent ACDF and CDA between 2011 and 2021. Epidemiological analyses were performed to examine trends in cervical procedure utilization by age group and year. After matching by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), levels of operation, and reason for surgery, the early postoperative (2-week), short-term (2-year), and long-term (5-year) complications of both cervical procedures were examined. RESULTS: In total, 404,195 ACDF and 29,465 CDA patients were included. ACDF utilization rose by 25.25% between 2011 and 2014 while CDA utilization rose by 654.24% between 2011-2019 followed by relative plateauing in both procedures. Mann-Kendall trend test confirmed a significant but small rise in ACDF and large rise in CDA procedures from 2011 to 2021 (p<.001). After matching, ACDF and CDA had an overall complication rate of 12.20% and 8.77%, respectively, with the most common complications being subsequent anterior revision (4.96% and 3.35%) and dysphagia (3.70% and 2.98%). The ACDF cohort, especially multilevel ACDF patients, generally had more complications and higher revision rates than the CDA cohort (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: While ACDF utilization has plateaued since 2014, CDA rates have risen by a staggering 654.24% over the past decade. ACDF and CDA complication and revision rates were relatively low in comparison to previously published values, with significantly lower rates in CDA. Although a lack of radiographic data in this study limits its power to recommend either procedure for individual patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy, CDA may be associated with minor improvement in the complication and revision profile.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae , Diskectomy , Reoperation , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Spinal Fusion/trends , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/statistics & numerical data , Diskectomy/trends , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiculopathy/surgery , Radiculopathy/epidemiology , Arthroplasty/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty/adverse effects , Total Disc Replacement/adverse effects , Total Disc Replacement/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is an important option for spinal operations, with advantages including rapid recovery and preservation of normal structures. As the number of geriatric patients is increasing, the role of MISS might expand in the future. MISS techniques and approaches continue to be developed, and recent trends in MISS development include the refinement of surgical approaches and techniques, as well as systems related to newly developed techniques, rather than spinal implants. Among the various techniques for MISS, endoscopic spine surgery, including uniportal and biportal endoscopic approaches, is the focus of vigorous research efforts that may lead to further expansion of the indications of endoscopic spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery will be an important part of spine surgery. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion may play meaningful roles in the MISS fusion area. Robotics and augmented reality are also likely to be important technological modalities in spine surgery in the future.
Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Neurosurgical Procedures , Spinal Fusion , Spine , Aged , Humans , Augmented Reality , Endoscopy , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/trends , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Spine/surgery , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , ForecastingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the long-term outcome of pulmonary function for arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and to further determine influential factors. METHODS: Eighteen AMC patients with a minimum of 3-year follow-up after PSF were prospectively collected. All the patients underwent a pulmonary function test before surgery and at the final follow-up. The percentage predicted values of vital capacity (VC%) and forced vital capacity (FVC%) were recorded. The following radiographic parameters were collected including Cobb angle and thoracic kyphosis. The total lung volumes (TLV) were measured on the image of 3-dimensional computed tomography scan by the reconstruction software. RESULTS: There were 10 males and 8 females with a mean age of 13.8 ± 6.1 years. The mean preoperative VC% and FVC% were 40.5% ± 7.6% and 39.5% ± 4.7%, which were significantly increased to 52.0% ± 7.5% and 51.2% ± 6.8% at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Besides, there was remarkable improvement in terms of TLV (1.57 ± 0.2 L vs. 2.39 ± 0.6 L, P < 0.001). Remarkable correlations were observed between TLV and pulmonary function tests (r = 0.79, P < 0.001 for VC%; r = 0.78, P < 0.001 for FVC%). Multiple regression analysis showed that 2 variables including Δ thoracic kyphosis and Δ Cobb angle were independently associated with the improvement of pulmonary function. CONCLUSIONS: The pulmonary function of AMC patients can be well improved through PSF surgery. It was remarkably associated with the correction of curve magnitude and restoration of thoracic kyphosis.
Subject(s)
Arthrogryposis/surgery , Lung/physiology , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Adolescent , Arthrogryposis/complications , Arthrogryposis/diagnostic imaging , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Kyphosis/etiology , Kyphosis/surgery , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Respiratory Function Tests/trends , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/etiology , Spinal Fusion/trends , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate influences of spinopelvic parameters, such as lumbar lordosis (LL) angles, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis, on development of the proximal junctional failure fracture type after posterior instrumentation. METHODS: This retrospective 1:3 matched case-control cohort study included 24 patients who developed proximal instrumented fracture in the study group and 72 patients without proximal junctional failure in the control group. Weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index and bone mineral density with T-score were recorded. In addition to spinopelvic parameters, proximal local kyphosis (PLK), which refers to a kyphosis angle between the upper end plate of upper instrumented vertebra plus 1 level and the lower end plate of upper instrumented vertebra; pelvic incidence-LL mismatch; and spinopelvic realignment score were calculated. RESULTS: More comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index, P = 0.002) and poorer bone density (T-score, P = 0.001) were noted in the study group. Before surgery, the study group had significantly lower LL (P = 0.046) and sacral slope (P = 0.043) and significantly higher PLK (P < 0.001) and pelvic tilt (P = 0.044) than the control group. Postoperatively, the study group had significantly higher PLK (P < 0.001) and lower LL (P = 0.031) than the control group; the degree of pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (P = 0.007) remained significantly higher in the study group. Preoperative (P = 0.026) and postoperative (P = 0.045) spinopelvic realignment scores was worse in the study group. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative PLK was the most significant radiographic factor to predict proximal instrumented fracture (P = 0.002, odds ratio 1.140, 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, appropriate LL and lower PLK should be obtained at surgery to prevent development of instrumented fracture.
Subject(s)
Lordosis/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Kyphosis/surgery , Lordosis/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Pelvic Bones/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Failure/trends , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/trends , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgeryABSTRACT
Anterior spine decompression and reconstruction with bone grafts and fusion is a routine spinal surgery. The intervertebral fusion cage can maintain intervertebral height and provide a bone graft window. Titanium fusion cages are the most widely used metal material in spinal clinical applications. However, there is a certain incidence of complications in clinical follow-ups, such as pseudoarticulation formation and implant displacement due to nonfusion of bone grafts in the cage. With the deepening research on metal materials, the properties of these materials have been developed from being biologically inert to having biological activity and biological functionalization, promoting adhesion, cell differentiation, and bone fusion. In addition, 3D printing, thin-film, active biological material, and 4D bioprinting technology are also being used in the biofunctionalization and intelligent advanced manufacturing processes of implant devices in the spine. This review focuses on the biofunctionalization of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages. The surface modifications of implant materials in metal endoscopy, material biocompatibility, and bioactive functionalizationare summarized. Furthermore, the prospects and challenges of the biofunctionalization of implant materials in spinal surgery are discussed. Fig.a.b.c.d.e.f.g As a pre-selected image for the cover, I really look forward to being selected. Special thanks to you for your comments.
Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/chemical synthesis , Biomedical Research/trends , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Prosthesis Design/trends , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biomedical Research/methods , Bone Substitutes/chemical synthesis , Bone Substitutes/chemistry , Bone Transplantation/instrumentation , Bone Transplantation/methods , Bone Transplantation/trends , Humans , Printing, Three-Dimensional/trends , Prostheses and Implants , Prosthesis Design/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ogilvie syndrome (OS) is a rare but serious condition seen in the postoperative period. This was an epidemiologic study using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2014 to look at incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with OS after primary spine fusion. METHODS: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent spine fusion surgery. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on the diagnosis of OS. Outcome measures and risk factors for cohorts were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and compared. RESULTS: Over the 10-year study period, 3,884,395 patients underwent primary spine fusion surgery. Among these, 0.04% developed OS during the index hospitalization. The greatest incidence seen in primary fusion involved the thoracic spine (0.15%). OS was more common after spine fusion for spine deformity (P < 0.001). Patients with OS were more likely to be men (P < 0.001), older (P < 0.0001), and have more comorbidities (P < 0.0001). Patients with OS were more likely to require postoperative blood transfusions (odds ratio [OR], 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-4.59; P < 0.001) and sustain any complication (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.17-5.57; P < 0.001). Patients with OS had a longer length of stay (15.7 vs. 3.9 days; P < 0.001) and increased average hospitalization cost ($63,037.03 vs. $26,792.19; P < 0.001). The development of OS was associated with fluid electrolyte disorder (OR, 4.06; 95% CI, 2.99-5.51; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OS is a rare but serious complication of primary spine fusion surgery. Identifying the specific risk factors, symptoms, and potential complications related to OS is critical to aid in decreasing the significant morbidity associated with its development.
Subject(s)
Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction/diagnosis , Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/trends , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a growth factor that aids in osteoinduction and promotes bone fusion. There is a lack of literature regarding recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) dosage in different spine surgeries. This study aims to investigate the trends in rhBMP-2 dosage and the associated complications in spinal arthrodesis. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted investigating spinal arthrodesis using rhBMP-2. Variables including age, procedure type, rhBMP-2 size, complications, and postoperative imaging were collected. Cases were grouped into the following surgical procedures: anterior lumbar interbody fusion/extreme lateral interbody fusion (ALIF/XLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF), posterolateral fusion (PLF), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and posterior cervical fusion (PCF). RESULTS: A total of 1209 patients who received rhBMP-2 from 2006 to 2020 were studied. Of these, 230 were categorized as ALIF/XLIF, 336 as PLIF/TLIF, 243 as PLF, 203 as ACDF, and 197 as PCF. PCF (P < 0.001), PLIF/TLIF (P < 0.001), and PLF (P < 0.001) demonstrated a significant decrease in the rhBMP-2 dose used per level, with major transitions seen in 2018, 2011, and 2013, respectively. In our sample, 129 complications following spinal arthrodesis were noted. A significant relation between rhBMP-2 size and complication rates (χ2= 73.73, P = 0.0029) was noted. rhBMP-2 dosage per level was a predictor of complication following spinal arthrodesis (odds ratio = 1.302 [1.05-1.55], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BMP is an effective compound in fusing adjacent spine segments. However, it carries some regional complications. We demonstrate a decreasing trend in the dose/vertebral level. A decrease rhBMP-2 dose per level correlated with a decrease in complication rates.
Subject(s)
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Spinal Diseases/drug therapy , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Spinal Fusion/trends , Transforming Growth Factor beta/administration & dosage , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Diskectomy/trends , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Perioperative blood loss is a major concern in spinal fusion surgery and often requires blood transfusion. A large amount of perioperative blood loss might increase the risks of various perioperative complications. Recent clinical studies have focused on the perioperative administration of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in spinal fusion surgery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EACA in spinal fusion surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched up to April 2021. Data on perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were extracted and analyzed by RevMan software. RESULTS: Six randomized controlled studies comprising 398 patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery were included in this systematic review. Compared with the control group, the EACA group had significantly lower total perioperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative blood transfusion units, total blood transfusion units, and postoperative red blood cell transfusion units. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the EACA and control groups in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion units, intraoperative crystalloid administered, hospital stays, operative time, perioperative respiratory complications, and wound bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: EACA in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery is effective in perioperative hemostasis without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. However, more large-scale trials are needed to examine the long-term adverse side effects of EACA in spinal fusion surgery.
Subject(s)
Aminocaproic Acid/administration & dosage , Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Aminocaproic Acid/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Perioperative Care/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interbody fusion at the caudal levels of long constructs for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is used to promote fusion and secure a solid foundation for maintenance of deformity correction. We sought to evaluate long-term pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, and revision rates for TLIF performed at the base of a long construct for ASD. METHODS: We reviewed 316 patients who underwent TLIF as a component of ASD surgery for medical comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and rate of unplanned reoperation for pseudarthrosis or instrumentation failure at the TLIF level. Fusion grading was assessed after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level. RESULTS: Rate of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF level was 9.8% (31/316), and rate of rod fractures was 7.9% (25/316). The rate of revision surgery at the TLIF level was 8.9% (28/316), and surgery was performed at a mean of 20.4 ± 16 months from the index procedure. Current smoking status (odds ratio 3.34, P = 0.037) was predictive of pseudarthrosis at the TLIF site. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 12 months after revision surgery, all patients had achieved bony union at the TLIF site. CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, the rate of pseudarthrosis after TLIF performed at the base of a long fusion for ASD was 9.8%, and the rate of revision surgery to address pseudarthrosis and/or rod fracture was 8.9%. All patients were successfully treated with revision interbody fusion or posterior augmentation of the fusion mass, without need for further revision procedures at the TLIF level.
Subject(s)
Internal Fixators/trends , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Pseudarthrosis/etiology , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Spinal Fusion/trends , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Internal Fixators/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure/trends , Pseudarthrosis/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate risk factors for 90-day readmission in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for small, medium, and large hospitals. To assess differences in length of stay, charges, and complication rates across hospitals of different size. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using elective, single-level ACDF data from 2016 to 2018 in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. Elective single-level ACDF cases were stratified into 3 groups by hospital bed size (small, medium, and large). All-cause complication rates, mean charges, length of stay, and 90-day readmission rates were compared across hospital size. Frequencies of specific comorbidities were compared between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients for each hospital size. Comorbidities significant on univariate analysis were evaluated as independent risk factors for 90-day readmission for each hospital size using multivariate regression. RESULTS: The overall 90-day readmission rate was 6.43% in 36,794 patients, and the rates for small, medium, and large hospitals were 6.25%, 6.28%, and 6.56%, respectively (P = 0.537). Length of stay increased significantly with hospital size (P < 0.001), and small hospitals had the lowest charges (P < 0.001). Although different independent predictors of 90-day readmission were identified for each hospital size, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic pulmonary disease, neurologic disorders, and rheumatic disease were identified as risk factors for hospitals of all sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital size is a determining factor for charges and length of stay associated with elective single-level ACDF. Variation in risk factors for readmission exists across hospital size in context of similar 90-day readmission rates.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy/trends , Elective Surgical Procedures/trends , Health Facility Size/trends , Patient Readmission/trends , Spinal Fusion/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/trends , Diskectomy/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Facility Size/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature about return to play (RTP) for golf protocols following cervical and lumbar fusions. The timing of return to this sport is a common question among patients. The aim of this review was to analyze and report the current protocols for RTP following cervical and lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. A 3-step, multiauthor screening process was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed and published prospective, case-control, cohort, case series, or review articles. Studies had to pertain to RTP for golf following instrumented cervical or lumbar spinal fusion to be included. RESULTS: Three articles met inclusion criteria: 2 retrospective survey-based cohort studies and 1 survey-based case series study. All studies included a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Of patients, 71.6% (n = 51) were able to RTP following surgery; 54.3%-80% were able to RTP at a similar or improved level of play as preoperatively. Postoperative pain reduction was noted in 2 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Most golfers are able to RTP within 12 months following cervical or lumbar spinal fusion. Patients generally reported decreased lower back pain and leg pain postoperatively. Following cervical or lumbar fusion, many golfers are able to RTP at the same or an increased frequency compared with preoperatively.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Golf/trends , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Return to Sport/trends , Spinal Fusion/trends , Cohort Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Return to Sport/standards , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: With hospital leaders and policy makers increasingly seeking ways to improve resource use, there has been heightened interest in reducing hospital length of stay (LOS) and performing spine procedures on an outpatient basis. We aimed to determine which risk factors correlated with prolonged LOS after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: Medical records for patients who underwent ALIF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those who had extended (≥3 days) versus nonextended (<3 days) LOS, and patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and preoperative medications were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression were then used to determine preoperative risk factors for extended LOS. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were included (mean age, 48.7 years). Medical comorbidities included hypertension (31.9%), diabetes (8.4%), and obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2) (48.8%). LOS was not extended in 121 patients and extended in 45. Mean LOS was 2.2 days (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.5). On multivariate logistic analysis, age ≥65 years (P = 0.001), preoperative benzodiazepine use (P = 0.014), 12-item Short Form mental component score (P = 0.008), estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), time to mobilization (P < 0.001), and total operative time (P = 0.020) were independent predictors for extended LOS. CONCLUSIONS: As attempts are made to perform more spine procedure in ambulatory surgical centers, strict patient selection criteria are all critical in making this possible. Our results suggest that age, preoperative benzodiazepine use, higher intraoperative blood loss, delayed mobilization, and lower 12-item Short Form mental component score were correlated with increased LOS. Therefore, inpatient ALIF may be more suitable for patients with these risk factors.
Subject(s)
Length of Stay/trends , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Care/trends , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Spinal Fusion/trends , Adult , Aged , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Preoperative Care/trends , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Fusion/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
Most existing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) outcome studies omit emergency department (ED) use. To our knowledge, this study on ED use following ACDF surgery is the first to use a direct patient chart review and the first to include revision patients, 1-5 levels of ACDFs, and performance of corpectomy in the analysis. This study examines the frequency and basis of hospital service use within 30 days of ACDF surgery, specifically ED visits, hospital readmissions, and returns to the operating room. A retrospective chart review was performed for 1273 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF surgery at one institution from July 2013 to June 2016. Of the 1273 patients with ACDF, 97 (7.6%) presented to the ED within 30 days after surgery. Of 43 patients with revision ACDF, 9 (20.9%) returned to the ED, compared with 88 (7.2%) of 1230 patients with primary ACDF (P = 0.001). Of the 111 ED visits by 97 patients, 40 (36%) were for cervicalgia, 13 (12%) were for dysphagia, 8 (7%) were for trauma, 7 (6%) were for nausea, 4 (4%) were for medication refill, 3 (3%) were for dehiscence, 3 (3%) were for pneumonia, and 3 (3%) were for urinary tract infection. Of the ED presentations, 8 (7%) occurred during the first 2 days after surgery, and 46 (41%) occurred within the first postoperative week.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Deglutition Disorders/surgery , Diskectomy/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Neck Pain/surgery , Patient Readmission/trends , Spinal Fusion/trends , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Deglutition Disorders/diagnosis , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Female , Hospitals/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation/trends , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effectsABSTRACT
AIM: To describe the history of the anterior approach to the lumbar spine from the beginning to the minimal invasive techniques that the authors have developed, and to discuss its advantages and drawbacks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors collected published data on the evolution of the anterior approach in the lumbar spine, and described its potential in different pathologies focusing on minimally invasive techniques. RESULTS: Several successful techniques of anterior lumbar approach have been developed over the years, leading to a progressive less invasive anatomical exposure of the spine. Anterior approaches of the lumbar spine gained popularity as an alternative to posterior routes in the management of tumors, infections, traumas, degenerative or deformity diseases and as a salvage procedure after posterior surgery. CONCLUSION: Advantages of the retroperitoneal anterior approach of the lumbar spine are well accepted: it preserves the anatomical structures of the abdomen and posterior tension band, avoiding muscle dissection. The implantation of lordotic cages with larger footprint improves local lordosis and fusion rate even in revision surgery. Drawbacks of traditional retroperitoneal approaches may be: vascular injury, deep venous thrombosis, risk of retrograde ejaculation in male in case of L5-S1 dissection. Therefore, several minimal invasive techniques have been developed to decrease the risks related to the traditional approaches. However, a long learning curve is required to achieve good skills and to manage possible technical concerns and complications.
Subject(s)
Neurosurgical Procedures/trends , Spinal Fusion , Spine/surgery , Female , Humans , Lordosis/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Retroperitoneal Space/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/trends , Vascular System Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical and surgical complication rates between robotic-assisted versus conventional elective posterior lumbar fusions. METHODS: The Symphony Integrated DataVerse was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification procedure codes to identify patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusions for degenerative spine pathologies between 2015 and 2018. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification procedure codes (8E0W4CZ, 8E0W0CZ, 8E0W3CZ) were used to identify patients undergoing a robotic-assisted spinal fusion. Outcome measures were 90-day medical and surgical complications, 1-year pseudarthrosis, and 1-year revision surgery rates. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether undergoing a robotic-assisted fusion (vs. conventional fusion) was associated with differences in wound complications, medical complications, pseudarthrosis, revision surgery, and readmissions within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 39,387 patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusions were included in the cohort-of whom 245 (0.62%) patients underwent a robotic-assisted fusion. Multivariate analysis showed that robotic-assisted fusion (vs. conventional fusion) was not associated with significant differences in 90-day rates of wound complications (P = 0.299), urinary tract infections (P = 0.648), acute myocardial infarctions (P = 0.209), acute renal failure (P = 0.461), pneumonia (P = 0.214), stroke (P = 0.917), deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.562), pulmonary embolism (P = 0.401), and readmissions (P = 0.985). In addition, there were no significant differences in the 1-year rates of revision fusions (P = 0.316) and pseudarthrosis (P = 0.695). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent a robotic-assisted fusion had similar rates of surgical and medical complications compared with those who underwent a conventional fusion. Further studies are warranted to better understand the future role of robots in spine surgery.