ABSTRACT
The forced and coerced sterilisation of women living with HIV (WLHIV) is a phenomenon reported in several countries. In Namibia, litigation efforts for cases of forced and coerced sterilisation were successful, yet the psychological and socio-cultural well-being of those affected has not been adequately investigated and addressed. To determine the psychological and socio-cultural effects of involuntary sterilisation on WLHIV in Namibia, qualitative data from seven WLHIV were collected through face-to-face interviews. Our analysis showed that, firstly, there are negative psychological effects manifesting in psychological symptoms associated with anxiety and depression. Secondly, there are negative socio-cultural effects including discrimination, victimisation and gender-based violence. Patriarchal cultural values regarding reproduction, marriage and decision-making contribute to negative psychological and socio-cultural effects. Finally, negative psychological and socio-cultural effects of involuntary sterilisation are long-lasting. For participants, coping remains difficult, even over a decade after the sterilisations. Given the considerable long-lasting negative psychological and socio-cultural effects, psychological interventions to expedite positive coping and well-being must be prioritised.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Marriage/psychology , Social Stigma , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Adult , Coercion , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Intimate Partner Violence , Menorrhagia/etiology , Namibia , Pregnancy , Sterilization, Involuntary/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Compensation and Redress/ethics , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Eugenics/history , Human Rights Abuses/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Reproductive/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Eugenics/trends , Female , Government Regulation , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Human Rights Abuses/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Political Systems , Religion and Medicine , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Sterilization, Reproductive/history , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Reproductive/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One quarter of the global population is of menstruating age, yet menstruation is shrouded in discrimination and taboos. Disability also carries stigma, so disabled people may face layers of discrimination when they are menstruating. The objective of the review is to assess the menstrual hygiene requirements of disabled people, the barriers they face, and the available interventions to help them manage their menstruation hygienically and with dignity. METHODS: Eligible studies, gathered across all countries, were identified by conducting searches across four databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health) in May 2017, with alerts set on each database to highlight new titles added until April 2018. Eligible studies incorporated analyses relevant to menstruating disabled people and/or how their carers provide support during their menstrual cycle. RESULTS: The 22 studies included were published since 1976; the majority after 2010 (n = 12; 55%). One study was a quasi-experiment; all others were observational. Most studies (n = 15; 68%) were from high income countries and most (n = 17; 77%) focused on people with intellectual impairments, so the review findings focus on this group and their carers. Outcomes investigated include choice and preference of menstrual product, ability to manage menstrual hygiene and coping strategies applied. Barriers faced included a lack of standardised guidance for professional carers; a lack of menstruation training, information and support provided to people with intellectual impairments and their carers; a lack of understanding of severity of symptoms experienced by people with intellectual impairments, the high cost of menstrual products and lack of appropriate options for people with physical impairments. Few interventions were found, and strategies for menstrual hygiene management applied by carers of persons with intellectual impairments include limiting the disabled person's movements when menstruating and suppressing their menstruation. CONCLUSIONS: Little evidence was identified on the requirements of disabled people and their carers in managing their menstruation, and only one intervention, but a range of barriers were identified. This gap in evidence is important, as the consequences of failing to meet menstrual hygiene needs of disabled people includes shame, social isolation, and even sterilisation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018095497.
Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Hygiene , Menstruation/psychology , Sexism , Social Stigma , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Menstrual Hygiene Products , Menstruation/physiology , Social Isolation/psychology , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychologySubject(s)
Empathy , Ethics, Medical , Morals , Physician's Role , Dehumanization , Ethics, Medical/history , Eugenics/history , Euthanasia, Involuntary , Germany , History, 20th Century , Holocaust/ethics , Holocaust/psychology , Human Characteristics , Humans , National Socialism , Physician's Role/history , Physician's Role/psychology , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Violence/psychologySubject(s)
Global Health/ethics , HIV Seropositivity , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights Abuses , Informed Consent , Physicians/ethics , Social Isolation , Social Stigma , Sterilization, Involuntary , Chile , Cultural Characteristics , Ethics, Medical , Female , Global Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights Abuses/ethics , Human Rights Abuses/psychology , Humans , Namibia , Personal Autonomy , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Prejudice , Social Isolation/psychology , Social Justice , South Africa , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychologyABSTRACT
This article examines the trope of reproduction in narratives of Tibetan refugees living in Dharamsala, India. As they make sense of their personal histories, Tibetan refugees invoke a collective story that mirrors human rights literature on Tibet. Women come into contact with this literature through its incorporation into a political discourse expressed by the exile government and health institutions. The article traces facets of this discourse that deal centrally with reproduction. Political discourse on reproduction articulates pronatalism as a solution to the refugee community's concern with survival, and the discourse frames modernity as a site of violence through China's reproductive regulations. And yet, Tibetan refugees also employ the notion of modernity when discussing their own free reproductive decision-making, positioning modern reproductive interventions in opposition to Indian society. The article demonstrates that Tibetan refugees navigate competing figurations of modernity by expressing political resistance and affiliation through the idiom of reproduction.
Subject(s)
Refugees/psychology , Reproductive Rights/psychology , Abortion, Induced , Anthropology, Medical , Female , Genocide , Humans , India , Male , Narration , Politics , Reproduction , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Tibet/ethnologyABSTRACT
Since 1998 South African law has provided that adults should have access to sterilization but only with their informed consent. However, the right to sterilization and other sexual and reproductive rights have not been fully realized as women struggle to access limited services, and there are allegations of discrimination and sterilization abuses. This qualitative study explores the experiences of 22 HIV-positive women in two provinces who reported being sterilized between 1996 and 2010 without their informed consent (n=18) or without their knowledge (n=4). Key issues reported by participants included failure to respect their autonomy, lack of information given about what sterilization entailed, and subtle or overt pressure to sign the consent form. Although the legal framework was intended to ensure informed decision-making regarding sterilization, these protections appear to have failed the HIV-positive women in this study. The findings suggest that some health professionals may consider a signature on a consent form as sufficient regardless of how it was obtained. Furthermore the women's perceptions that they were singled out as needing to be sterilized simply because they were HIV-positive warrants further investigation. More research is required on the nature of the problem and on other stakeholders' perceptions.
Subject(s)
HIV Seropositivity , Informed Consent , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Sterilization, Reproductive/psychology , Women's Rights , Female , Humans , Knowledge , Qualitative Research , Reproductive Rights , South AfricaABSTRACT
Despite the growing number of women living with and affected by HIV, there is still insufficient attention to their pregnancy-related needs, rights, decisions and desires in research, policy and programs. We carried out a review of the literature to ascertain the current state of knowledge and highlight areas requiring further attention. We found that contraceptive options for pregnancy prevention by HIV-positive women are insufficient: condoms are not always available or acceptable, and other options are limited by affordability, availability or efficacy. Further, coerced sterilization of women living with HIV is widely reported. Information gaps persist in relation to effectiveness, safety and best practices regarding assisted reproductive technologies. Attention to neonatal outcomes generally outweighs attention to the health of women before, during and after pregnancy. Access to safe abortion and post-abortion care services, which are critical to women's ability to fulfill their sexual and reproductive rights, are often curtailed. There is inadequate attention to HIV-positive sex workers, injecting drug users and adolescents. The many challenges that women living with HIV encounter in their interactions with sexual and reproductive health services shape their pregnancy decisions. It is critical that HIV-positive women be more involved in the design and implementation of research, policies and programs related to their pregnancy-related needs and rights.
Subject(s)
Decision Making , HIV Infections/psychology , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Contraception/methods , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Drug Interactions , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Maternal Welfare , Pregnancy , Reproductive Rights , Sex Workers , Social Stigma , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Sterilization, Reproductive/psychology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Women's RightsABSTRACT
Mental retardation denotes sub-average intellectual functioning, based on IQ, i.e. the inability of normal learning, accompanied by behavioral and developmental disorders. Persons with impairments (cognitive, motor, sensory or psychiatric) have often been, both through human history and today victims of discrimination and deprived of their basic human rights, both in the public and the private life spheres. Since the end of the 20th century, throughout the developed world, many disabled persons can accomplish their dreams and rights. However, the issue of sexuality is still an obstacle in realizing oneself as a whole person, of course in accordance with personal psychophysical abilities. The greatest problem is present in persons with severe disablement, considered not apt enough for information on sexuality and for expressing themselves as persons with their own sexual needs. Thus it is desirable to observe each disabled person individually and flexibly enough in order to establish parameters for the functioning of an intimate affair on the level of understanding and assent. The legal system must protect the most vulnerable and ensure for them the right of choice and consent, as well as the possibility of fulfilling their sexual needs, so that they could love and be loved. Naturally, the system must be built on foundations that satisfy the needs of its users, but also of persons engaged in work with them. Sex education should contain information regarding biological, socio-cultural and spiritual dimensions of sexuality, including cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Unfortunately, very few educational programs with such aims provide sex education, not only for the disabled young population but also for the healthy. This review article is based on international investigations and Croatian legislative postulates. Its aim is to focus the attention of both professionals and non-professionals on this delicate problem.
Subject(s)
Persons with Mental Disabilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Persons with Mental Disabilities/psychology , Reproductive Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Rights/psychology , Croatia , Ethics, Medical , Female , Human Rights , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , Prejudice , Sex Education/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychologySubject(s)
Disabled Persons/education , Disabled Persons/psychology , Education of Intellectually Disabled , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Love , Sex Education , Taboo/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child Abuse, Sexual/legislation & jurisprudence , Child Abuse, Sexual/prevention & control , Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Scholars have been studying eugenics and sterilization for years, but only recently have some begun to examine these issues from the point of view of those sterilized. This is in large part because so few records containing the voices of the sterilized exist or are accessible to scholars. This essay examines my own effort to recover the voices of women sterilized in the post-baby boom United States from the "bottom up" and includes my own experience researching and writing Fit to Be Tied?: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1960-1984. It represents the beginning of a discussion about locating and using sources containing the voices of the sterilized and working with the limitations inherent to them.
Subject(s)
Reproductive Rights/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , United StatesSubject(s)
Humans , Leprosy/psychology , Social Isolation/psychology , Patient Isolation , Patient Isolation/standards , Patient Isolation/psychology , Patient Isolation/trends , Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/standards , Abortion, Induced/psychology , Sterilization, Involuntary , Sterilization, Involuntary/standards , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Sterilization, ReproductiveSubject(s)
Eugenics , Euthanasia , National Socialism , Propaganda , Austria/ethnology , Demography , Ethnicity/education , Ethnicity/ethnology , Ethnicity/history , Ethnicity/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethnicity/psychology , Eugenics/history , Eugenics/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/history , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia/psychology , History, 20th Century , Human Experimentation/ethics , Human Experimentation/history , Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Motion Pictures/history , National Socialism/history , Politics , Socioeconomic Factors , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , War Crimes/ethics , War Crimes/ethnology , War Crimes/history , War Crimes/legislation & jurisprudence , War Crimes/psychologySubject(s)
Euthanasia , Motion Pictures , Propaganda , Sterilization, Involuntary , Biological Evolution , Ethics, Medical/education , Ethics, Medical/history , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/history , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia/psychology , Germany/ethnology , History, 20th Century , Motion Pictures/ethics , Motion Pictures/history , National Socialism/history , Social Desirability , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychologySubject(s)
Agriculture , Emigrants and Immigrants , Prejudice , Rural Population , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/history , Agriculture/legislation & jurisprudence , Crops, Agricultural/economics , Crops, Agricultural/history , Emigrants and Immigrants/history , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigration and Immigration/history , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethnicity/ethnology , Ethnicity/history , Ethnicity/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethnicity/psychology , Europe, Eastern/ethnology , Germany/ethnology , History, 20th Century , Homicide/ethics , Homicide/ethnology , Homicide/history , Homicide/psychology , Humans , National Socialism/history , Political Systems/history , Public Health/history , Public Policy , Race Relations/history , Race Relations/legislation & jurisprudence , Race Relations/psychology , Racial Groups/ethnology , Racial Groups/genetics , Racial Groups/history , Racial Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , Racial Groups/psychology , Rural Population/history , Social Welfare/ethnology , Social Welfare/history , Social Welfare/psychology , Sterilization, Involuntary/ethics , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Transients and Migrants/history , Transients and Migrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Transients and Migrants/psychology , World War IISubject(s)
Emigration and Immigration , Eugenics , Public Policy , Sterilization , Emigrants and Immigrants/education , Emigrants and Immigrants/history , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigration and Immigration/history , Emigration and Immigration/legislation & jurisprudence , Eugenics/history , History, 20th Century , Politics , Societies/history , Sterilization/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/history , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Transients and Migrants/education , Transients and Migrants/history , Transients and Migrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Transients and Migrants/psychology , United Kingdom/ethnology , United States/ethnology , Women/education , Women/history , Women/psychology , Women's Rights/history , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Surgical voluntary sterilization has become one of the most widely used methods of contraception, with vasectomy and tubal sterilization being the most commonly employed techniques, associated with a low failure, morbidity, mortality, and long-term sequelae rate. As sterilization is related with the elimination of the possibility for procreation, a number of ethical, legal and religious issues have arisen, leading often to personal misjudgements, legal disputes, and failures in applying family planning. Involuntary sterilization is currently not practiced, except in cases of severely mentally retarded people, who are unable to appreciate the consequences of their acts or care for their children and who may have a high likelihood of propagating hereditary disease.
Subject(s)
Ethics, Medical , Religion and Psychology , Sterilization, Involuntary/psychology , Sterilization, Reproductive/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
This article compares the fate of the Gypsies under the Third Reich to that of the Jews, arguing that, despite parallels, the treatment each group underwent differed fundamentally. The Nazis never formulated a plan for a "Final Solution" to the Gypsy problem analogous to that for the Jews. Compulsory sterilization affected only a relatively small portion of the Gypsy population, and killings that did take place were carried out to achieve Nazi solutions to specific local situations. Numerous sources, especially recently discovered local police files, show that large numbers of "racially pure" and "socially adjusted" Gypsies were exempted from deportation to the Gypsy family camp in Auschwitz and were allowed to survive the war.