ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of regret among Canadians undergoing tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy for contraception in the context of widely available, highly effective, and tolerable reversible contraceptive methods including long-acting reversible contraceptives. METHODS: We performed an online cross-sectional survey of regret following tubal sterilization using Qualtrics software. A convenience sample was used to recruit Canadian residents between the ages of 18 and 60 years who had undergone tubal ligation or salpingectomy for contraception. The online survey was advertised on 3 social media platforms: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. RESULTS: We obtained survey results for 844 Canadian residents. Regret was reported by 15.9% of respondents. Consistent with existing literature, factors associated with regret included younger age at the time of the procedure, a change in relationship status, and having the procedure performed at the time of a pregnancy. Surprisingly, 9.5% of respondents reported an element of coercion, 4.5% were unaware the procedure was considered permanent contraception, and 33.3% did not recall their provider discussing alternative forms of contraception with them prior to surgery. CONCLUSION: We found that the prevalence of regret following tubal sterilization has not changed with the widespread availability of highly effective reversible contraceptive methods. However, most patients choosing permanent contraception will be satisfied with their decision. Shared decision-making should respect the autonomy of each patient to make their own decisions regarding the most acceptable family planning method for their circumstances.
Subject(s)
Emotions , Salpingectomy , Sterilization, Tubal , Humans , Female , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Canada , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Contraception/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify the completion rate for postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) and predictors of noncompletion of PPTL in a central New Jersey population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review at a tertiary care center in New Jersey for patients delivering during an 18-month period. We used the electronic medical record to identify all of the patients who had documented desire for a PPTL at the time of admission. We calculated the rate of PPTL completion and identified predictors of completion and risk factors for noncompletion. We recorded any documented reasons for cancellation and choice of contraception after noncompletion. RESULTS: Of 626 women who requested PPTL on admission, 508 (81.2%) procedures were performed. The most common reasons for noncompletion were patient changing her mind (38.1%) and unknown/not documented (22.9%). Cesarean delivery was the strongest predictor of completion, with 93.4% completion among cesarean deliveries compared with 65.6% among vaginal deliveries (P < 0.01). Lack of insurance also was associated with noncompletion (P < 0.01). There was no difference in body mass index (P = 0.75), gravidity (P = 0.99), parity (P = 0.72), or high-risk status (P = 0.47) between completed and noncompleted PPTL. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery is a strong predictor of PPTL completion, most likely because of easier availability of the operating room, anesthesia, and ancillary staff. Body mass index, gravidity, and parity are not associated with PPTL completion. Future research should focus on exploring whether this association is system, provider, or patient dependent.
Subject(s)
Postpartum Period , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , New Jersey , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tubal ligation, as a permanent contraception method, have a negative and positive impact on women's life. This study aimed to test a conceptual model considering the interrelated role of menorrhagia, body image concern, self-esteem, sexual function, anxiety and depression on quality of life (QOL) of sterilized women. METHODS: The current study was conducted as a cross-sectional study on 200 sterilized women. Data were collected using a socio-demographic checklist, Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), pictorial blood loss assessment chart, female sexual function index, hospital anxiety and depression scale, body image concern inventory, and Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and path analysis. RESULTS: Results show that anxiety, sexual function, self-esteem, and body image dissatisfaction have a direct effect on women's QOL. Higher level of anxiety, and body dissatisfaction directly reduce QOL. Sexual function, and menorrhagia, with an indirect effect through anxiety, reduces QOL. Higher level of anxiety with indirect effect thorough self-esteem can worsen QOL. Also, sexual function indirectly affects QOL through anxiety. CONCLUSION: It looks that the proposed predictors of this model are greatly important. These findings give support for a hypothetical model in which betterment in SF, body image satisfaction, self-esteem, anxiety, and menorrhagia led to a good QOL of sterilized women. Hence, in designing care for sterilized women, these factors should be considered.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Body Dissatisfaction/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Personal Satisfaction , Self Concept , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
RESUMEN Objetivo: Determinar las características sociodemográficas, los antecedentes gíneco-obstétricos, la percepción y los conocimientos previos asociados a no realizarse la esterilización quirúrgica en mujeres gran multíparas internadas en un hospital de la provincia de Huancayo. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio de tipo cuantitativo, prospectivo y de corte transversal, que se realizó en las mujeres gran multíparas internadas en el Hospital Regional Docente Materno Infantil "El Carmen" de Huancayo; que cumplieran con los criterios de inclusión. Se aplicó un instrumento de recolección de tipo encuesta. Se realizó una estadística descriptiva, así como, el análisis bivariado y multivariado. Resultados: Un 73% de las mujeres encuestadas no se realizaría la esterilización quirúrgica a futuro, sin embargo, a un 90% le gustaría recibir más información al respecto. Los factores estadísticamente significativos asociados a no realizase la esterilización quirúrgica fueron: No haber utilizado ningún método anticonceptivo anteriormente (RPa: 1,35; IC 95%: 1,01-1,82; p: 0,042), no saber si desea tener más hijos (RPa: 1,58; IC 95%: 1,22-2,03; p <0,001), pensar que realizarse la esterilización quirúrgica iría en contra de sus derechos (RPa: 1,24; IC 95%:1,05-1,46; p: 0,008) y pensar que la esterilización quirúrgica produce alteraciones menstruales (RPa: 1,11; IC 95%:1,17-1,34; p: 0,027). Conclusiones: Muchas mujeres encuestadas no optarían por la esterilización quirúrgica a futuro, debido a diversos factores, muchos de ellos modificables con una adecuada capacitación e intervención del personal de salud.
ABSTRACT Objective: Determine sociodemographic characteristics, gynecological-obstetric history, perception and previous knowledge associated with not performing surgical sterilization in large multiparous women admitted to a hospital in the province of Huancayo. Materials and Methods: A quantitative, prospective and cross-sectional study, was carried out on large multiparous women hospitalized in the gynecology and obstetrics services of the Regional Maternal and Child Teaching Hospital "El Carmen" of Huancayo; that met the inclusion criteria. A survey-type collection instrument was applied. A descriptive statistic was carried out, as well as the bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: 73% of the women surveyed would not undergo surgical sterilization in the future, however, 90% would like to receive more information about it. The statistically significant factors associated with not performing surgical sterilization were: Not having used any contraceptive method previously (RPa: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.01-1.82, p: 0.042), not knowing if you want having more children (RPa: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.22-2.03, p <0.001), thinking that performing surgical sterilization would be against their rights (RPa: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.46; p: 0.008) and to think that surgical sterilization produces menstrual alterations (RPa: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.17-1.34, p: 0.027). Conclusions: Many women surveyed would not opt for surgical sterilization in the future due to various factors, many of them modifiable with adequate training and intervention of health personnel.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical data , Women/psychology , Parity , Peru , Socioeconomic Factors , Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Cross-Sectional Studies , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Uptake of permanent contraception among women remains low in sub-Saharan Africa compared to other regions. We aimed to synthesize available evidence on barriers to, and facilitators of permanent contraception with regards to tubal ligation among women in sub-Saharan Africa. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed literature on tubal ligation among African women published between January 1, 2000 and October 30, 2017. We searched PubMed, Global health, EMBASE, Web of science, and Google scholar for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies which reported on barriers and/or facilitators to uptake of tubal ligation in sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, we conducted a narrative synthesis and categorized our findings using a framework based on the social ecological model. RESULTS: We included 48 articles in the review. Identified barriers to tubal ligation among women included individual-level (myths and misconceptions, fear of surgery, irreversibility of procedure, religious beliefs), interpersonal-level (male partner disapproval), and organizational-level (lack of healthcare worker expertise and equipment) factors. Facilitating factors included achievement of desired family size and perceived effectiveness (individual-level), supportive male partners and knowing other women with permanent contraception experience (interpersonal-level), and finally, subsidized cost of the procedure and task-sharing with lower cadre healthcare workers (organizational-level). CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to, and facilitators of permanent contraception among women in sub-Saharan Africa are multilevel in nature. Strategies countering these barriers should be prioritized, as effective contraception can promote women's health and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa. In addition to these strategies, more quantitative research is needed to further understand patient-level factors associated with uptake of permanent contraception among women.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Africa South of the Sahara , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To understand women's preferences for permanent contraception by salpingectomy or tubal occlusion following standardized counseling and evaluate the practicality of a future randomized trial. STUDY DESIGN: We invited pregnant and non-pregnant women planning permanent contraception at the University of California, Davis (UCD) and University of Tennessee (UT) Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics to participate. We enrolled women when they received routine counseling and signed procedure consent. Participants received standardized information sheets reviewing permanent contraception options based on pregnancy status then completed an anonymous survey with questions about demographics, method preference, and willingness to participate in a hypothetical randomized trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion. We evaluated predictors for salpingectomy preference using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: From July 2015 to October 2016, we enrolled 75 women at UCD and 63 women at UT. Overall, respondents preferred salpingectomy (63.0%); among the 47 women not currently pregnant at both sites, 40 (85.1%) preferred salpingectomy, most commonly because of higher efficacy. Although population characteristics differed significantly between the sites, only UCD site (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.9, 9.4) and non-pregnancy status (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.6, 10.8) predicted preference for salpingectomy in the multivariable model. Most participants (n=84, 60.9%) would not be willing to be randomized to a theoretical trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion procedures. CONCLUSION: Among a diverse group of women from two different areas in the U.S. given a choice of permanent contraception methods, salpingectomy is preferred over tubal occlusion. Most women planning a permanent contraceptive procedure would not agree to a randomized comparison of these methods. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Salpingectomy, which offers theoretically higher efficacy and potentially greater ovarian cancer protection compared to tubal occlusion, is preferred by the majority of patients and should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. Differences in method choices less likely reflect the patient population and more likely the counseling provided.
Subject(s)
Contraception/psychology , Patient Preference/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/psychology , Research Subjects/psychology , Salpingectomy/psychology , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations between socio-demographic factors and the general knowledge, the attitudes and perceptions of women attending antenatal clinic at Greys Hospital regarding postpartum tubal ligation (BTL). METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study describing the perceptions about BTL in 241 pregnant women was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty six (68.9%) participants needed to involve their partners before tubal ligation. Thirty five percent of 102 participants who would not have BTL against partner's wish were unemployed. Eighty three (34.4%) participants, mostly with secondary and tertiary education believed that successful reversal of BTL is guaranteed. Fifty two percent of participants, predominantly with no formal schooling and primary education levels were unaware of the risk of falling pregnant after BTL. Sixty seven (27.8%) participants, predominantly with primary education or no formal schooling believed that BTL protects against STIs and HIV. Seventy eight (32.4%) of participants would not have BTL due to religious beliefs, however, participants from the same religion gave different answers to the question. CONCLUSION: The study showed a significant lack of knowledge on key points of BTL. Socio-demographic factors still influence this subject and should not be underestimated during counselling of the patients to reduce potential morbidity and litigation.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Postpartum Period , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Contraception Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Parity , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , South Africa , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
There is a clear discrepancy in the way those who request medical assistance in pursuit of their reproductive choices are treated. On the one hand, women who request a sterilisation are urged to consider possible future regrets and are sometimes refused treatment in anticipation of such regrets. This is despite the fact that for all age ranges, the majority of women undergoing a sterilisation do not regret the decision. Moreover, women who are voluntarily childless are likely to have a happier and more gratifying life than parents. On the other hand, women who request fertility treatment are not urged to second guess their desire for parenthood. Although the fact that the probability of regret is expected to be higher in the former case than in the latter justifies this difference in treatment to a certain extent, the gap between the two different approaches is wider than it ought to be if we also take future well-being into consideration, instead of focussing exclusively on anticipated decision regret.
Subject(s)
Choice Behavior/ethics , Emotions , Refusal to Treat/ethics , Reproductive Behavior/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Sterilization, Tubal/ethics , Adult , Age Factors , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Personal Autonomy , Physician's Role , Pregnancy , Reproductive Behavior/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Sterilization Reversal/statistics & numerical data , Sterilization, Tubal/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Female sterilization is one of the most common contraceptive methods. A small number of women, however, opt for reversal of sterilization procedures after they experience regret. Procedures can be performed by laparotomy or laparoscopy, with or without robotic assistance. Another commonly utilized alternative is IVF. The choice between surgery and IVF is often influenced by reimbursement politics for that particular geographic location. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: We evaluated the fertility outcomes of different surgical methods available for the reversal of female sterilization, compared these to IVF and assessed the prognostic factors for success. SEARCH METHODS: Two search strategies were employed. Firstly, we searched for randomized and non-randomized clinical studies presenting fertility outcomes of sterilization reversal up to July 2016. Data on the following outcomes were collected: pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, cost of the procedure and operative time. Eligible study designs included prospective or retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and case series. No age restriction was applied. Exclusion criteria were patients suffering from tubal infertility from any other reason (e.g. infection, endometriosis and adhesions from previous surgery) and studies including <10 participants. The following factors likely to influence the success of sterilization reversal procedures were then evaluated: female age, BMI and duration and method of sterilization. Secondly, we searched for randomized and non-randomized clinical studies that compared reversal of sterilization to IVF and evaluated them for pregnancy outcomes and cost effectiveness. OUTCOMES: We included 37 studies that investigated a total of 10 689 women. No randomized controlled trials were found. Most studies were retrospective cohort studies of a moderate quality. The pooled pregnancy rate after sterilization reversal was 42-69%, with heterogeneity seen from the different methods utilized. The reported ectopic pregnancy rate was 4-8%. The only prognostic factor affecting the chance of conception was female age. The surgical approach (i.e. laparotomy [microscopic], laparoscopy or robotic) had no impact on the outcome, with the exception of the macroscopic laparotomic technique, which had inferior results and is not currently utilized. For older women, IVF could be a more cost-effective alternative for the reversal of sterilization. However, direct comparative data are lacking and a cut-off age cannot be stated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: In sterilized women who suffer regret, surgical tubal re-anastomosis is an effective treatment, especially in younger women. However, there is a need for randomized controlled trials comparing the success rates and costs of surgical reversal with IVF.
Subject(s)
Fallopian Tubes/surgery , Pregnancy Rate , Sterilization Reversal/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization Reversal/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the factors associated with the occurrence of pregnancies after the diagnosis of infection by HIV. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with women of a reproductive age living with HIV/AIDS cared for in the public services of the city of Porto Alegre, in southern Brazil. The data was analyzed from a comparison between two groups: women with and women without pregnancies after the diagnosis of HIV. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the reasons of prevalence (RP). RESULTS: The occurrence of pregnancies after the diagnosis of HIV is associated with a lower level of education (RP adjusted = 1.31; IC95%: 1.03-1.66), non-use of condoms in the first sexual intercourse (RP = 1.32; IC95%: 1.02-1.70), being 20 years old or less when diagnosed with HIV (RP = 3.48; IC95%: 2.02-6.01), and experience of violence related to the diagnosis of HIV (RP = 1.28; IC95%: 1.06-1.56). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of pregnancies after the diagnosis of infection by HIV does not indicate the exercise of the reproductive rights of the women living with HIV/AIDS because these pregnancies occurred in contexts of great vulnerability.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Female , Freedom , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/psychology , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Intimate Partner Violence , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/psychology , Pregnancy, Unplanned , Pregnancy, Unwanted , Reproductive History , Risk-Taking , Sex Work , Social Determinants of Health , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
This cross-sectional study sought to determine factors associated with sterilization among HIV-positive US women. HIV-positive women aged 18-45 completed an Audio Computer Assisted Self Interview (ACASI) questionnaire. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with sterilization. The median age of the 187 participants was 37, the majority had at least a high school education, and 88% were African American. Nearly a quarter (22%) of women had undergone sterilization at an average age of 25; of these women, 71% cited their HIV-positive status as an important factor in deciding to have a tubal ligation, 22% expressed desire for future children, 32% reported sterilization regret, and 20% reported feeling pressure to undergo sterilization. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with sterilization included non-African American race, no desire for future pregnancy, having heard of any birth control methods making it harder to get pregnant in the future, belief that women should take a break from hormonal methods every few years, and having had a child born with HIV. While almost a quarter of this HIV-positive group was sterilized, many during the height of the early HIV epidemic, a large proportion of sterilized women expressed sterilization regret. Counseling messages for sterilized HIV-positive women should be sensitive to the fact that women may have regret regarding a decision that, in some cases, may historically have been part of provider recommendations to prevent vertical transmission of HIV. Improved knowledge about contraceptive options such as the IUD and implant is needed among HIV-positive women.
Subject(s)
Emotions , HIV Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Contraception , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Middle Aged , Motivation , Reproductive Behavior , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
Sterilisation requests made by young, child-free adults are frequently denied by doctors, despite sterilisation being legally available to individuals over the age of 18. A commonly given reason for denied requests is that the patient will later regret their decision. In this paper, I examine whether the possibility of future regret is a good reason for denying a sterilisation request. I argue that it is not and hence that decision-competent adults who have no desire to have children should have their requests approved. It is a condition of being recognised as autonomous that a person ought to be permitted to make decisions that they might later regret, provided that their decision is justified at the time that it is made. There is also evidence to suggest that sterilisation requests made by men are more likely to be approved than requests made by women, even when age and number of children are factored in. This may indicate that attitudes towards sterilisation are influenced by gender discourses that define women in terms of reproduction and mothering. If this is the case, then it is unjustified and should be addressed. There is no good reason to judge people's sterilisation requests differently in virtue of their gender.
Subject(s)
Decision Making/ethics , Elective Surgical Procedures/ethics , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Personal Autonomy , Refusal to Treat/ethics , Reproductive Behavior/ethics , Sterilization, Tubal/ethics , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Choice Behavior/ethics , Emotions , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Physician's Role , Reproductive Behavior/psychology , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
When a gynecologist asks a twenty-one-year-old patient about her use of contraception, he is surprised that she would like to have a tubal ligation. The patient says that she would "never want to bring a child into this screwed up world." She has discussed tubal ligation with her boyfriend of one year, and he has told her that he accepts her decision. She asks her doctor if she can schedule the procedure as soon as possible. Her gynecologist mentions that he is concerned that she is very young and may eventually change her mind about having children. She insists that she has thought about it carefully and is certain that she wants the procedure. Her doctor feels very uncomfortable about this request. He consults the hospital ethics committee. Should he do as the patient asks or suggest that she wait at least six months and reconsider?
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Decision Making , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Physician-Patient Relations , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Female , Humans , Women's Health , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between sterilisation reasons, regret, and depressive symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White US women ages 25-45 who participated in the National Survey of Fertility Barriers (NSFB) and reported a tubal sterilisation surgery were included in the sample for this study (n=837). Logistic regression was used to examine how characteristics of the sterilisation surgery (reasons for sterilisation, time since sterilisation, and new relationship since sterilisation) are associated with the odds of sterilisation regret, and linear regression was used to examine associations between sterilisation regret, sociodemographic factors, and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Findings revealed that 28 percent of U.S. women who have undergone tubal sterilisation report regret. Time since sterilisation and having a reason for sterilisation other than simply not wanting (more) children (e.g., situational factors, health problems, encouragement by others, and other reasons) are associated with significantly higher odds of sterilisation regret. Finally, sterilisation regret is significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Sterilisation regret is relatively common among women who have undergone tubal sterilisation, and regret is linked to elevated, but not necessarily clinical depressive symptoms. The reasons for sterilisation can have important implications for women's sterilisation regret and associated depressive symptoms.
Subject(s)
Depression , Emotions , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Black or African American , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , White PeopleABSTRACT
Tubal ligation (TL) is an option for contraception for women who have completed their family. The existence of sexual dysfunction and impaired quality of life (QOL) following this procedure has been the subject of debate for decades. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sexual function, QOL and other factors affecting Iranian women who underwent TL. A historical cohort study was carried out on 150 women who had undergone TL and on 150 women who had used a condom (as the control group). The sexual function of participants was evaluated and compared using Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. They were also asked to fill out the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) for evaluating their QOL. Furthermore, the effects of educational level and poststerilization regret in the women of TL group were evaluated. With regard to FSFI, all mean values were found to be lower in the TL women and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant in all domains. A significant difference was found in sexual dysfunction in orgasm (P = 0.02), satisfaction (P = 0.01), pain (P = 0.006) and total FSFI scores (P = 0.006) between the women regretting vs those not regretting their sterilization. In evaluating the relationship between FSFI and educational level, with the increase of educational level all domain scores increased significantly only in the TL group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in SF-12 scores (69.18 ± 14.05 vs 78.41 ± 12.50; P < 0.0001). Our findings reveal the adverse effects of TL on the sexual life and QOL of women. It is recommended that the awareness and knowledge of health-care professionals regarding the sexual function and QOL in women undergoing TL should be increased.
Subject(s)
Libido/physiology , Personal Satisfaction , Quality of Life/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Iran , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine female and male sterilization patterns in the United States based on marital status, and to determine if sociodemographic characteristics explain these patterns. DESIGN: Survival analysis of cross-sectional data from the female and male samples from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): The survey is designed to be representative of the US civilian noninstitutionalized population, ages 15-44 years. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Vasectomy and tubal sterilization. RESULT(S): In the United States, vasectomy is the near-exclusive domain of married men. Never-married and ever-married single men, and never-married cohabiting men, had a low relative risk (RR) of vasectomy (RR = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.0, respectively), compared with men in first marriages. Tubal sterilization was not limited to currently married, or even to ever-married women, although it was less common among never-married single women (RR = 0.2) and more common among women in higher-order marriages (RR = 1.8), compared with women in first marriages. In contrast to vasectomy, differential use of tubal sterilization by marital status was driven in large part by differences in parity. CONCLUSION(S): This study shows that being unmarried at the time of sterilization--an important risk factor for poststerilization regret--was much more common among women than men. In addition to contributing to the predominance of female, vs. male, sterilization, this pattern highlights the importance of educating women on the permanency of sterilization, and the opportunity to increase reliance on long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
Subject(s)
Contraception Behavior/psychology , Contraception Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Sterilization, Tubal/statistics & numerical data , Vasectomy/psychology , Vasectomy/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the regret rate and risk factors for regret among women who have undergone sterilization. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among all women who underwent a sterilization procedure at the University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia, in 2008-2012. Identified women were contacted and asked to complete an online questionnaire assessing regret and symptoms associated with depression. RESULTS: Among 714 identified women, 308 (43.1%) completed the questionnaire. Four (1.3%) participants reported regret, and 9 (2.9%) reported that they would not opt for sterilization again, all of whom had post-sterilization problems. Such problems were significantly associated with participants reporting that they would not opt for sterilization again (P=0.003). Additionally, women who would not choose sterilization again had significantly higher scores on the depressive scale used than did those who would undergo sterilization again (P=0.028). CONCLUSION: Few women report regret after tubal sterilization in Slovenia. However, an additional consultation on post-sterilization problems and depressive disorder before sterilization might minimize the risk of regret.
Subject(s)
Depression/psychology , Emotions , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Slovenia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of microinsert hysteroscopic sterilization method at short- and long-term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period between January 2004 and December 2005, 34 patients who submitted to the present gynecology outpatient clinic seeking for permanent contraception and accepted tubal sterilization with microinsert method were included in this prospective, interventional study. RESULTS: Bilateral microinsert placement was successful in 28 (87.5%) of 32 patients that underwent the procedure. In all of the 30 patients (100%) in whom the placement procedure was attempted, bilateral tubal occlusion was documented by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) including the two patients in whom unilateral placement was carried out. First three procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Local or general anesthesia was not administered in any other cases (97.5%). The mean visual analogue scale score for pain felt during the procedure was 3.1. The mean procedure time was 11.5 ± 4.88 (5-22) minutes, the average time from beginning the procedure to discharge of the patients was 41.7 ± 18.5 (15-94) minutes. One intrauterine pregnancy was detected in one of the patients nine months after cessation of the alternative contraceptive period. This patient was excluded from the follow-up. At short-term all patients rated their microinsert-wearing tolerance as good or excellent. At eighth year, three patients were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 83.4 ± 15.0 (36-103) months. During 2,420 woman-months of follow-up, no other pregnancies were detected. Almost all of the patients were happy with the procedure and recommended it to a friend. CONCLUSION: Essure microinsert is a safe, effective, minimally invasive sterilization method which can be performed in outpatient settings without any anesthesia requirement. It appears to be a good alternative to laparoscopic tubal sterilization. The procedure time and the time to discharge are brief. Patient tolerance during the procedure and at long-term is very good.
Subject(s)
Hysteroscopy/methods , Sterilization, Tubal , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hysterosalpingography/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Patient Preference , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sterilization, Tubal/adverse effects , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Tubal ligation is one of the most commonly used contraceptive methods worldwide. Since the controversy over the potential effects of tubal sterilization still continues, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical and psychological repercussions of videolaparoscopic tubal ligation. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational, single cohort, retrospective study, conducted in a tertiary public hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire was applied to 130 women aged 21-46 years who underwent videolaparoscopic tubal ligation by means of tubal ring insertion or bipolar electrocoagulation and sectioning, between January 1999 and December 2007. Menstrual cycle interval, intensity and duration of bleeding, premenstrual symptoms, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic pelvic pain and degree of sexual satisfaction were assessed in this questionnaire. Each woman served as her own control, and comparisons were made between before and after the surgical procedure and between the two techniques used. RESULTS: The clinical and psychological repercussions were significant, with increases in bleeding (P = 0.001), premenstrual symptoms (P < 0.001), dysmenorrhea (P = 0.019) and noncyclic pelvic pain (P = 0.001); and reductions in the number of sexual intercourse occurrences per week (P = 0.001) and in libido (P = 0.001). Women aged ≤ 35 years at the time of sterilization were more likely to develop menstrual abnormalities. The bipolar electrocoagulation method showed greater clinical and psychological repercussions. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the technique used, videolaparoscopic tubal ligation had repercussions consisting of increased menstrual flow and premenstrual symptoms, especially in women aged ≤ 35 years, and also had a negative influence on sexual activity. .
CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: A ligadura tubária é um dos métodos contraceptivos mais utilizados em todo o mundo. Como a controvérsia sobre seus possíveis efeitos ainda continua, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as repercussões clínicas e psíquicas da laqueadura videolaparoscópica. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Estudo observacional de coorte único, retrospectivo, conduzido em hospital público terciário. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário a 130 mulheres, entre 21-46 anos, submetidas à ligadura tubária videolaparoscópica, pelas técnicas de eletrocoagulação bipolar/secção ou inserção do anel tubário, entre janeiro de 1999 e dezembro de 2007. Nesse questionário avaliou-se: intervalo do ciclo menstrual, intensidade e duração do sangramento, sintomas pré-menstruais, dismenorreia, dispareunia, dor pélvica não cíclica e grau de satisfação sexual. Cada mulher serviu como seu próprio controle, foi realizada análise comparativa entre os períodos pré- e pós-cirúrgico e entre as duas técnicas utilizadas. RESULTADOS: As repercussões clínicas e psicológicas mostraram-se significativas, com aumento de sangramento (P = 0,001), de sintomas pré-menstruais (P < 0,001), dismenorreia (P = 0,019), dor pélvica não cíclica (P = 0,001), e redução no número de relações sexuais por semana (P = 0,001) e na libido (P = 0,001). Mulheres com idade ≤ 35 anos, no momento da laqueadura, mostraram-se mais propensas a desenvolverem alterações menstruais. A técnica de eletrocoagulação bipolar mostrou maiores repercussões clínicas e psíquicas. CONCLUSÃO: A ligadura tubária videolaparoscópica, independentemente da técnica, repercutiu com ...
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Laparoscopy , Menstruation Disturbances/etiology , Sterilization, Tubal/adverse effects , Sterilization, Tubal/psychology , Coitus/psychology , Family Planning Services/methods , Libido , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Menstrual Hygiene Products , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a growing clinical consensus that Medicaid sterilization consent protections should be revisited because they impede desired care for many women. Here, we consider the broad social and ideological contexts for past sterilization abuses, beyond informed consent. RECENT FINDINGS: Throughout the US history, the fertility and childbearing of poor women and women of color were not valued equally to those of affluent white women. This is evident in a range of practices and policies, including black women's treatment during slavery, removal of Native children to off-reservation boarding schools and coercive sterilizations of poor white women and women of color. Thus, reproductive experiences throughout the US history were stratified. This ideology of stratified reproduction persists today in social welfare programs, drug policy and programs promoting long-acting reversible contraception. SUMMARY: At their core, sterilization abuses reflected an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which some women's fertility was devalued compared to other women's fertility. Revisiting Medicaid sterilization regulations must therefore put issues of race, ethnicity, class, power and resources - not just informed consent - at the center of analyses.