Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(5): 601-603, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32036800

ABSTRACT

The transmission rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to gloves or gowns of healthcare personnel (HCP) caring for MRSA patients in a non-intensive care unit setting was 5.4%. Contamination rates were higher among HCP performing direct patient care and when patients had detectable MRSA on their body. These findings may inform risk-based contact precautions.


Subject(s)
Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Cross Infection , Health Personnel , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Prospective Studies
2.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 478(6): 1359-1365, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31977431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical helmet systems commonly are stand-alone systems with a single fan blowing air into the suit, creating positive pressure that blows particles out through areas of low resistance, possibly contaminating surgical attire and the surgical field. Two-fan systems were developed more recently to release spent air, also theoretically lowering pressure in the suit and decreasing the aforementioned risk of particle contamination. To our knowledge no study to date has measured the potential differences in gown particle contamination to support this hypothesis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We compared a commonly used single-fan system versus a two-fan system and asked: (1) Which fan system results in less gown particle contamination? (2) Are there differences between the systems in the location of contamination? METHODS: Using an existing experimental study model, two surgeons performed five 30-minute TKA simulations comparing a single-fan to a double-fan helmet system after applying fluorescent powder to the hands, axillae, and chest. Both are two-piece hood and gown systems. The single-fan sits on top of the helmet blowing air into the suit; the double-fan system has a second fan positioned at the rear blowing out spent air. Ultraviolet light-enhanced photographs were subsequently obtained of the flexor and extensor surfaces of the arms, axillary areas, and front and back of the chest. We chose these locations because they all contain either a seam or an overlap between gown and hood or gloves through which particles can escape. The images were scored for contamination on a scale of 1 (zero specks) to 4 (> 100 specks) by three independent observers. Interobserver correlation was assessed through Spearman's test yielding 0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94; p < 0.0001), 0.81 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.87; p < 0.0001) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.91; p < 0.0001) between observers 1 and 2, observers 1 and 3, and observers 2 and 3, rendering the used scale reliable. Results of the observers were averaged and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There was no difference in overall gown particle contamination between the systems (overall single-fan median contamination score 2.5 of 4 [interquartile range Q1-Q3 0-3.42] versus double fan 1 out of 4 (Q1-Q3 0-3); p = 0.082), but all tests showed there was contamination at the gown-glove interface. In general, there were few differences between the two systems in terms of location of the contamination; however, when comparing only the axillary regions, we found that the single-fan group (median score 3.67 [Q1-Q3 3-4]) showed more contamination than the double-fan group (2.33 [Q1-Q3 0-3.08]); p = 0.01. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in gown particle contamination between a single-fan and a double-fan helmet design. However, we note that contamination was present in all tests with both systems, so surgeons should not assume that these systems provide a contamination-free environment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When using such helmets, the surgeon should not place items close to the axillary region because the seam of the gown may have low resistance to particle contamination. Gown designs could be improved by creating better seals, especially at the arm-body seam.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Joint Prosthesis/adverse effects , Operating Rooms , Personal Protective Equipment , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(1): 56-60, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Measures for the prevention of postsurgical infections include issuing special scrubs for the operating room (OR) and prohibiting walking out of the OR complex wearing these scrubs. The aim of this study was to provide further data on bacterial contamination of surgical scrubs. METHODS: Specimens were collected at the entrance to the OR from surgical scrubs worn by surgeons. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding the times, places, and activities in which they were involved during the time interval they were wearing the scrubs. RESULTS: Among the 133 surgeons who participated, the median colony-forming unit (CFU) count was higher (39 CFU/plate) for their scrubs than for clean scrubs worn by the control group (3 CFU/plate; n = 11; P < .001), but there was no significant difference between the study and control groups in the rate of carriage of pathogenic bacteria (13% and 9%, respectively). The majority of the bacteria isolated were considered commensals. Fifty-five (41%) of the surgeons stated that before sampling they took part in medical activities, and 45 (34%) participated in non-medical activities. Practicing these activities was associated with a higher number of CFUs compared to not being involved in such activities (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that, even in less than optimal situations when scrubs are worn outside the OR, surgical scrubs are contaminated with a low bacterial load and only a small number of pathogenic bacteria.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Operating Rooms , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Bacterial Load/methods , Humans , Surgeons
4.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 85(17)2019 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31300397

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile is the primary cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea globally. In unfavorable environments, the organism produces highly resistant spores which can survive microbicidal insult. Our previous research determined the ability of C. difficile spores to adhere to clinical surfaces, finding that spores had markedly different hydrophobic properties and adherence abilities. Investigation into the effect of the microbicide sodium dichloroisocyanurate on C. difficile spore transmission revealed that sublethal concentrations increased spore adherence without reducing viability. The present study examined the ability of spores to transmit across clinical surfaces and their response to an in-use disinfection concentration of 1,000 ppm of chlorine-releasing agent sodium dichloroisocyanurate. In an effort to understand if these surfaces contribute to nosocomial spore transmission, surgical isolation gowns, hospital-grade stainless steel, and floor vinyl were spiked with 1 × 106 spores/ml of two types of C. difficile spore preparations: crude spores and purified spores. The hydrophobicity of each spore type versus clinical surface was examined via plate transfer assay and scanning electron microscopy. The experiment was repeated, and spiked clinical surfaces were exposed to 1,000 ppm sodium dichloroisocyanurate at the recommended 10-min contact time. Results revealed that the hydrophobicity and structure of clinical surfaces can influence spore transmission and that outer spore surface structures may play a part in spore adhesion. Spores remained viable on clinical surfaces after microbicide exposure at the recommended disinfection concentration, demonstrating ineffectual sporicidal action. This study showed that C. difficile spores can transmit and survive between various clinical surfaces despite appropriate use of microbicides.IMPORTANCEClostridium difficile is a health care-acquired organism and the causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Its spores are implicated in fecal to oral transmission from contaminated surfaces in the health care environment due to their adherent nature. Contaminated surfaces are cleaned using high-strength chemicals to remove and kill the spores; however, despite appropriate infection control measures, there is still high incidence of C. difficile infection in patients in the United States. Our research examined the effect of a high-strength biocide on spores of C. difficile which had been spiked onto a range of clinically relevant surfaces, including isolation gowns, stainless steel, and floor vinyl. This study found that C. difficile spores were able to survive exposure to appropriate concentrations of biocide, highlighting the need to examine the effectiveness of infection control measures to prevent spore transmission and to consider the prevalence of biocide resistance when decontaminating health care surfaces.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Adhesion/physiology , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/transmission , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/physiology , Floors and Floorcoverings , Spores, Bacterial/physiology , Stainless Steel , Surgical Attire/microbiology
5.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 139(7): 1015-1019, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127407

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical instrument contamination during total joint replacement is a matter of major concern. Available recommendations suggest changing suction tips, gloves and avoiding light handle manipulation during the procedure. There is a paucity of data regarding surgical gown contamination. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contamination rate of surgical gowns (SGs) during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and secondarily compare it with other orthopedic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty surgical gowns (from 70 surgeries) were screened for bacterial contamination using thioglycolate (a high-sensitivity culture broth). The THA contamination rate was compared with those of knee and spine procedures. Controls were obtained at the beginning of every surgery and from the culture broth. The procedure's duration and the level of training of the surgeon were evaluated as potential risk factors for contamination. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was identified on 12% of surgical gowns (22% of surgical procedures). The contamination rate during THA was 4.1% (2% in primary THA and 8.3% in revisions) vs 21.67% during other surgeries (spine and knee) (OR 6.15, p = 0.012). There were no contaminated SGs during THAs performed in ≤ 2 h (0/33 SGs) vs 7.5% (3/40) for THAs that took ≥ 2 h (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: There was a high rate of SG contamination during orthopedic procedures that was higher during non-arthroplasty procedures and prolonged THAs. There were no contaminated surgical gowns in THAs under 120 min, efforts should point keeping primary THAs under this cutoff time. As a general recommendation, SGs should be changed every time there is concern about potential contamination.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Equipment Contamination , Surgical Attire , Surgical Wound Infection , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Chile/epidemiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Operative Time , Risk Factors , Surgical Attire/adverse effects , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 101(3): 354-360, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infection occurs in 2-4% of arthroplasty cases, and identifying potential sources of infection can help to reduce infection rates. The aim of this study was to identify the impact and potential for the contamination of hands and gowns whilst scrubbing using sterile surgical helmet systems (SSHSs). METHODS: A colony-forming unit (cfu) is a pathogenic particle of 0.5-5 µm. Standard arthroplasty hoods and SSHSs, with and without the fan switched on, were tested for a 3-min exposure (to represent scrubbing time) on three subjects and a mannequin with concurrent particle counts and culture plates. RESULTS: All SSHSs were positive for Gram-positive cocci, with a mean colony count of 410 cfu/m2. Background counts were lower for laminar flow areas [mean 0.7 particles/m3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0-1.4] than scrub areas (mean 131.5 particles/m3; 95% CI 123.5-137.9; P=0.0003). However, neither grew any bacteria with a 2-min exposure. The background count increased 3.7 times with the fan switched on (total P=0.004, cfu P=0.047), and all helmets had positive cultures (mean 36 cfu/m2). There were no positive cultures with the standard arthroplasty hood or the SSHS with the fan switched off. In laminar flow areas, all cultures were negative and particle counts were low. CONCLUSIONS: Sterile gloves and gowns can be contaminated when scrubbing with the SSHS fan switched on. It is recommended that the fan should remain switched off when scrubbing until the hood and gown are in place, ideally in a laminar flow environment.


Subject(s)
Gloves, Surgical/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Hand Disinfection/methods , Head Protective Devices/microbiology , Personal Protective Equipment/microbiology , Preoperative Care/methods , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Environmental Microbiology , Humans
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 68, 2018 02 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409447

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections are a major setback in the healthcare delivery system especially in developing countries due to the limited resources. The roles played by medical care equipment and work surfaces in the transmission of such organisms have inevitably contributed to the elevated mortality, morbidity and antibiotic resistances. METHODS: A total 138 samples were collected during the study from Kawolo general hospital. Swab samples were collected from various work surfaces and fomites which consisted of; beds, sink taps, infusion stands, switches, work tables and scissors. Cultures were done and the susceptibility patterns of the isolates were determined using Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Data was analyzed using Stata 13 and Microsoft Excel 2013 packages. RESULTS: A total of 44.2% (61/138) of the collected swab specimens represented the overall bacterial contamination of the sampled articles. Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae accounted for the highest bacterial contaminants constituting of 75.4% (46/61) and 11.5% (7/61) respectively. Infusion stands and patient beds were found to have the highest bacterial contamination levels both constituting 19.67% (12/61). The highest degree of transmission of organisms to patients was found to be statistically significant for patient beds with OR: 20.1 and P-value 8X10- 4. Vancomycin, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin were the most effective antibiotics with 100%, 80% and 80% sensitivity patterns among the isolates respectively. Multi-drug resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 52% (24/46) with 4% (1/24) classified as a possible extensively drug resistant (XDR) whereas Gram negative isolates had 27% (4/15) MDR strains out of which 50%(2/4) were classified as possible pan-drug resistant (PDR). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of bacterial contaminants in the hospital work environment is an indicator of poor or ineffective decontamination. The study findings reiterate the necessity to formulate drug usage policies and re-examine effectiveness of decontamination and sterilization practices within Kawolo general hospital. We also recommend installation of a sound Microbiology unit at the hospital to take on susceptibility testing to check on the empirical use of antibiotics as a way of reducing the rampant elevations in drug resistances.


Subject(s)
Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Surgical Equipment/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bedding and Linens/microbiology , Ceftriaxone/pharmacology , Ciprofloxacin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Hospitals, General , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Operating Tables/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Uganda , Vancomycin/pharmacology
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 46(4): 379-382, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29056327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of the site where an obstetrician dresses in their surgical scrubs, home versus hospital, on total bacterial burden remains unknown. Therefore, our objective was to quantify the effect of dressing in surgical scrubs at home versus at the hospital on the bacterial contamination at the beginning of a scheduled shift. METHODS: This was a single blind randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants were resident physicians assigned to labor and delivery at a single institution during the study period, and participants were randomized daily to 1 of 4 arms based on the site where their scrubs were laundered (A) and where the resident dressed (B) (A/B): home/home, home/hospital, hospital/home, and hospital/hospital. At the beginning of the assigned shift, microbiologic samples from the chest pocket and pants' tie were collected with a sterile culture swab. Samples were plated on trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood before being incubated at 35°C-37°C for 48 hours, with observation every 24 hours. The primary outcome was total bacterial burden, defined as the sum of the colony forming units (CFUs) from the 2 sampling sites. RESULTS: There were 21 residents randomized daily for 4 days to 1 of 4 study arms, resulting in 84 observations. There were no baseline differences between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts. Overall, 68% of sampled scrubs demonstrated some bacterial growth. There was no difference between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts in percentage of samples demonstrating any bacterial growth after 72 hours (60% vs 76%, P = .14), nor in median bacterial burden at the beginning of a shift (2 [interquartile range, 0-7] vs 1 [interquartile range, 1-5] CFUs, P = .62). Finally, there was no difference in total bacterial burden at the beginning of a shift between the home- and hospital-dressed cohorts when stratified by site where the scrubs were laundered. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in total bacterial burden of surgical scrubs at the start of a shift between cohorts who dressed at home versus at the hospital.


Subject(s)
Hospitals , Housing , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Humans , Protective Clothing/microbiology
9.
J Orthop Trauma ; 30(10): e351-6, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27124823

ABSTRACT

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become a routine and useful adjunct within orthopaedic surgery. However, the fluoroscopy machine may become an additional source of contamination in the operating room, particularly when maneuvering from the anterior-posterior position to the lateral position. Consequently, draping techniques were developed to maintain sterility of the operative field and surgeon. Despite a variety of methods, no studies exist to compare the sterility of these techniques specifically when the fluoroscopy machine is in the lateral imaging position. We evaluated the sterility of 3 c-arm draping techniques in a simulated operative environment. The 3 techniques consisted of a traditional 3-quarter sterile sheet attached to the side of the operative table, a modified clip-drape method, and a commercially available sterile pouch. Our study demonstrated that the traditional method poses a high risk for sterile field contamination, whereas the modified clip-drape method and commercially available sterile pouch kept floor contamination furthest from the surgical field. With the current data, we urge surgeons to use modified techniques rather than the traditional draping method.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Infection Control/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Surgical Drapes , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Operating Rooms/standards , Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation , Orthopedic Procedures/standards , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Surgical Drapes/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(11): 1411-3, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25333437

ABSTRACT

Healthcare worker attire may become contaminated with pathogenic organisms during a normal shift. We performed a randomized crossover study to assess whether treatment with an antimicrobial coating would decrease bacterial contamination on scrubs. Thirty percent of all scrubs were contaminated; there was no difference in the rate of contamination between the intervention and control groups.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Equipment Contamination , Fomites/microbiology , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Bacterial Load , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Single-Blind Method
12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(17): 1485-92, 2014 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25187588

ABSTRACT

➤ Although there is some evidence that scrubs, masks, and head coverings reduce bacterial counts in the operating room, there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.➤ The use of gloves and impervious surgical gowns in the operating room reduces the prevalence of surgical site infection.➤ Operating-room ventilation plays an unclear role in the prevention of surgical site infection.➤ Exposure of fluids and surgical instruments to the operating-room environment can lead to contamination. Room traffic increases levels of bacteria in the operating room, although the role of this contamination in surgical site infection is unclear.


Subject(s)
Operating Rooms/standards , Surgical Attire/standards , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Environment, Controlled , Environmental Microbiology , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Humans , Infection Control/standards , Patient Safety , Surgical Attire/microbiology
13.
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi ; 38(2): 138-40, 2014 Mar.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24941782

ABSTRACT

Firstly, the essay introduces the definition of bio-burden, the significance of determination of bio-burden and the specific performance requirements. Then, the essay introduces the method selection and validation on the bio-burden determination of surgical drapes, gowns and clean air suits.


Subject(s)
Equipment Contamination , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Surgical Drapes/microbiology , Surgical Attire/standards , Surgical Drapes/standards
14.
J Hosp Infect ; 84(3): 245-7, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23694760

ABSTRACT

It is desirable to maintain a low bacterial count in the operating room air to prevent surgical site infection. This can be achieved by ventilation or by all staff in the operating room wearing clothes made from low-permeable material (i.e. clean air suits). We investigated whether there was a difference in protective efficacy between a single-use clothing system made of polypropylene and a reusable clothing system made of a mixed material (cotton/polyester) by testing both in a dispersal chamber and during surgical procedures. Counts of colony-forming units (cfu)/m(3) air were significantly lower when using the single-use clothing system in both settings.


Subject(s)
Air Microbiology , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Load , Disposable Equipment/microbiology , Operating Rooms , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Humans , Male
15.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(5): 487-93, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23571365

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. To determine whether enhanced daily cleaning would reduce contamination of healthcare worker (HCW) gowns and gloves with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB). DESIGN. A cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING. Four intensive care units (ICUs) in an urban tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTs. ICU rooms occupied by patients colonized with MRSA or MDRAB. INTERVENTION. Extra enhanced daily cleaning of ICU room surfaces frequently touched by HCWs. RESULTS. A total of 4,444 cultures were collected from 132 rooms over 10 months. Using fluorescent dot markers at 2,199 surfaces, we found that 26% of surfaces in control rooms were cleaned and that 100% of surfaces in experimental rooms were cleaned (P < .001). The mean proportion of contaminated HCW gowns and gloves following routine care provision and before leaving the rooms of patients with MDRAB was 16% among control rooms and 12% among experimental rooms (relative risk, 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.28-2.11]; P = .23). For MRSA, the mean proportions were 22% and 19%, respectively (relative risk, 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.53]; P = .16). DISCUSSION. Intense enhanced daily cleaning of ICU rooms occupied by patients colonized with MRSA or MDRAB was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in contamination of HCW gowns and gloves after routine patient care activities. Further research is needed to determine whether intense environmental cleaning will lead to significant reductions and fewer infections.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Fomites/microbiology , Gloves, Protective/microbiology , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Fluorescent Dyes , Housekeeping, Hospital/methods , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Patients' Rooms
16.
AORN J ; 95(1): 122-37; quiz 138-40, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22201576

ABSTRACT

Surgical attire is intended to protect both patients and perioperative personnel. AORN published the "Recommended practices for surgical attire" to guide perioperative RNs in establishing protocols for selecting, wearing, and laundering surgical attire. Perioperative RNs should work with vendors and managers to ensure appropriate surgical attire is available, model the correct practices for donning and wearing surgical attire, and teach team members about evidence-based practices. The recommendation that surgical attire not be home laundered is supported by evidence that perioperative nurses can share with their colleagues and managers to help support appropriate practices. Hospital and ambulatory surgery center scenarios have been included as examples of appropriate execution of these recommended practices.


Subject(s)
Clothing/standards , Laundering , Perioperative Nursing/standards , Surgical Attire/standards , Disinfection , Hand Disinfection/standards , Humans , Jewelry , Laundering/standards , Laundry Service, Hospital , Masks/standards , Materials Testing , Surgical Attire/microbiology
17.
Vet J ; 192(3): 489-93, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22015140

ABSTRACT

Silver-impregnated fabrics are widely used for their antibacterial and antifungal effects, including for clinical clothing such as surgical scrub suits (scrubs). This study investigated whether silver impregnation reduces surface bacterial contamination of surgical scrubs during use in a veterinary hospital. Using agar contact plates, abdominal and lumbar areas of silver-impregnated nylon or polyester/cotton scrubs were sampled for surface bacterial contamination before (0 h) and after 4 and 8h of use. The number of bacterial colonies on each contact plate was counted after 24 and 48 h incubation at 37°C. Standard basic descriptive statistics and mixed-effects linear regression were used to investigate the association of possible predictors of the level of bacterial contamination of the scrubs with surface bacterial counts. Silver-impregnated scrubs had significantly lowered bacterial colony counts (BCC) at 0 h compared with polyester/cotton scrubs. However, after 4 and 8h of wear, silver impregnation had no effect on BCC. Scrub tops with higher BCC at 0 h had significantly higher BCC at 4 and 8h, suggesting that contamination present at 0 h persisted during wear. Sampling from the lumbar area was associated with lower BCC at all three time points. Other factors (contamination of the scrub top with a medication/drug, restraint of patients, working in the anaesthesia recovery area) also affected BCC at some time points. Silver impregnation appeared to be ineffective in reducing bacterial contamination of scrubs during use in a veterinary hospital.


Subject(s)
Protective Clothing/microbiology , Protective Clothing/veterinary , Silver/pharmacology , Surgical Attire/microbiology , Surgical Attire/veterinary , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Silver/chemistry
20.
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi ; 32(4): 290-2, 2008 Jul.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18973041

ABSTRACT

The essay introduces the study on the performance monitoring tests for the resistance to wet bacterial penetration about surgical gowns and surgical drapes in accordance with ISO 22610.


Subject(s)
Microbiological Techniques/methods , Protective Clothing/standards , Surgical Attire/standards , Microbiological Techniques/instrumentation , Operating Rooms , Protective Clothing/microbiology , Surgical Attire/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...