ABSTRACT
Few intrapericardial robotic lung resection cases have been reported in the literature because of the perceived complexity of the procedure, with most surgeons embarking on an open resection via a thoracotomy. We present the case of a right middle and lower lobe tumour involving the pericardium and the origin of the right middle lobe vein. An intrapericardial lower bilobectomy was performed, with pericardial resection, pre-pericardial fat resection and mesh reconstruction. The vascular stapler for the right middle lobe vein was fired on the atrium. The resection was completed via a retrograde and fissureless approach, dividing the bronchus intermedius first, because it was impossible to open the fissure, leaving the division of the pulmonary artery until last. The case was performed solely robotically, with no complications and excellent postoperative recovery. Robotic resection can be performed successfully when pericardial lung tumours are involved.
Subject(s)
Heart Atria , Lung Neoplasms , Pericardium , Pneumonectomy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Pericardium/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Heart Atria/surgery , Male , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Surgical Staplers , FemaleABSTRACT
Xkin closure is a newly developed medical suture device for lacerations and surgical wounds that can reduce scarring, pain and the risk of infection compared with conventional sutures or staplers. A randomized controlled study was performed to compare the wound healing effects and complications of Xkin closure with stapler closure. Fifty patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer were randomly assigned. Only the wound above the navel, which was extended to take out the prostate was targeted. The wound was examined at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery, and the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), scar height and side effects were assessed with a 3D skin analyser. Forty-six patients (23 Xkin, 23 Stapler) were analysed. The mVSS scores, vascularity and pliability were significantly lower in the Xkin group compared with the stapler group at the 12-week follow-up. No significant differences in the maximum peak and depth of the scars were detected between the two groups using 3D photographs at 12 weeks. Xkin is an effective wound closure method for improving scar outcomes. This method is expected to be widely used for surgical wounds and lacerations caused by trauma in daily life.
Subject(s)
Suture Techniques , Wound Healing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Cicatrix/prevention & control , Cicatrix/etiology , Surgical Tape , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Sutures , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Wound , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal anastomotic leakage causes severe consequences for patients and healthcare system as it will lead to increased consumption of hospital resources and costs. Technological improvements in anastomotic devices could reduce the incidence of leakage and its economic impact. The aim of the present study was to assess if the use of a new powered circular stapler is cost-effective. METHOD: This observational study included patients undergoing left-sided circular stapled colorectal anastomosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Propensity score matching was carried out to create two comparable groups depending on whether the anastomosis was performed using a manual or powered circular device. The rate of anastomotic leakage, its severity, the consumption of hospital resources, and its cost were the main outcome measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the powered circular stapler versus manual circular staplers was performed. RESULTS: A total of 330 patients were included in the study, 165 in each group. Anastomotic leakage rates were significantly different (p = 0.012): 22 patients (13.3%) in the manual group versus 8 patients (4.8%) in the powered group. The effectiveness of the powered stapler and manual stapler was 98.27% and 93.69%, respectively. The average cost per patient in the powered group was 6238.38, compared with 9700.12 in the manual group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was - 74,915.28 per patient without anastomotic complications. CONCLUSION: The incremental cost of powered circular stapler compared with manual devices was offset by the savings from lowered incidence and cost of management of anastomotic leaks.
Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Anastomotic Leak , Colon , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Rectum , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Anastomotic Leak/economics , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Female , Surgical Staplers/economics , Male , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/economics , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Incidence , Surgical Stapling/economics , Surgical Stapling/methods , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Colon/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Propensity Score , Adult , Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has become a treatment option for benign and malignant pancreatic tumors, the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers in MIDP remain controversial. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of reinforced staplers in MIDP and identify the risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after MIDP with reinforced staplers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 92 consecutive patients who underwent MIDP at NHO Kyushu Medical Center from July 2016 to August 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. In all patients, a reinforced black cartridge triple-row stapler (Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used during MIDP. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant POPF. The risk factors for POPF were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients, 74 underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 18 underwent robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. Clinically relevant POPF occurred in seven (7.6%) of 92 patients. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) was 10.8%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler was a body mass index of ≥22.6 kg/m2 (p=0.050, odds ratio=7.60). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers for preventing POPF after MIDP. A high body mass index was the only risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler.
Subject(s)
Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Fistula , Postoperative Complications , Surgical Staplers , Humans , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Adult , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Surgical Stapling/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Haemostasis-related complications associated with Medtronic Tri-stapleTM with preloaded buttress material and the novel, naked AEONTM gastrointestinal staplers have not been extensively studied in bariatric surgery. The study aimed to assess and compare the 30-day haemostasis-related complications between Medtronic Tri-stapleTM and AEONTM GIA staplers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent primary or revision sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or the sleeve component of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with SG (SADI-S) in a private hospital in Australia between November 2021 and December 2022. The surgeries were performed by a single surgeon, using either Medtronic Tri-stapleTM or AEONTM staplers. Results: The analysis included 250 patients, with the first 125 consecutive patients receiving staple line using the Medtronic Tri-stapleTM GIA stapler and the subsequent 125 patients receiving staple line using the AEONTM GIA stapler. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the distribution of surgical procedures between the Medtronic and AEON groups. In the AEON group, there were statistically higher numbers of diabetics and former tobacco users, while other preoperative characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The AEON group had a significantly longer mean operative time, while the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. No intraoperative or 30-day complications, deaths, emergency room visits, readmissions, or reoperations were observed in either group. Conclusion: The novel, naked AEONTM stapler demonstrated non-inferiority to the established Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with preloaded buttress material in achieving hemostasis and maintaining staple-line integrity in bariatric surgery.
Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Middle Aged , Surgical Stapling/methods , Adult , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Hemostasis, Surgical/instrumentation , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Equipment DesignABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the main complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential benefit of different durations of progressive stapler closure on POPF rate and severity after DP. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP between 2016 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups according to the duration of the stapler closure: those who underwent a progressive compression for < 10 min and those for ≥ 10 min. RESULTS: Among 155 DPs, 83 (53.5%) patients underwent pre-firing compression for < 10 min and 72 (46.5%) for ≥ 10 min. As a whole, 101 (65.1%) developed POPF. A lower incidence rate was found in case of ≥ 10 min compression (34-47.2%) compared to < 10 min compression (67- 80.7%) (p = 0.001). When only clinically relevant (CR) POPFs were considered, a prolonged pre-firing compression led to a lower rate (15-20.8%) than the < 10 min cohort (32-38.6%; p = 0.02). At the multivariate analysis, a compression time of at least 10 min was confirmed as a protective factor for both POPF (OR: 5.47, 95% CI: 2.16-13.87; p = 0.04) and CR-POPF (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.19-5.45; p = 0.04) development. In case of a thick pancreatic gland, a prolonged pancreatic compression for at least 10 min was significantly associated to a lower rate of CR-POPF compared to < 10 min (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: A prolonged pre-firing pancreatic compression for at least 10 min seems to significantly reduce the risk of CR-POPF development. Moreover, significant advantages are documented in case of a thick pancreatic gland.
Subject(s)
Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Fistula , Postoperative Complications , Surgical Stapling , Humans , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/methods , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Surgical Stapling/methods , Surgical Staplers , Adult , Time Factors , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of stapler pharyngeal closure after total laryngectomy by the incidence of PCT and assessment of swallowing after surgery. In addition, the study aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes in terms of patients' survival rates. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 58 patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma who underwent total laryngectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups according to the method of pharyngeal repair after laryngectomy: manual closure group (n = 28), and stapler group (n = 30). Functional and oncological outcomes were assessed and compared. RESULTS: The incidence of pharyngocutaneous fistula was significantly less in the stapler group. Additionally, operative time was significantly shorter and swallowing function was better in the stapler group compared to the manual group. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding survival rates. CONCLUSION: The stapler is a reliable method for pharyngeal closure after total laryngectomy if the limits of its indications regarding the primary tumor are considered. Stapler closure decreases the incidence of PCF and decreases the surgical time. Good swallowing outcomes are achieved without compromising the oncological outcomes.
Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms , Laryngectomy , Humans , Laryngectomy/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pharyngeal Diseases/etiology , Pharyngeal Diseases/prevention & control , Pharynx/surgery , Operative Time , Treatment Outcome , Surgical Staplers , Adult , Cutaneous Fistula/etiology , Cutaneous Fistula/prevention & control , Cutaneous Fistula/epidemiology , Surgical Stapling/methods , Deglutition/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) occur after 20% to 30% of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using triple-row staplers in preventing POPFs. METHODS: Between April 2016 and May 2023, 59 patients underwent complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. There were more females (n=34, 57.6%) than males (n=25, 42.4%). The median age of the patients was 68.9 years. The patients were divided into slow-compression (n=19) and no-compression (n=40) groups and examined for pancreatic leakage. Both groups were examined with respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), pancreatic thickness at the pancreatic dissection site, pancreatic texture, diagnosis, operative time, blood loss, presence of POPF, date of drain removal, and length of hospital stay. In addition, risk factors for POPF were examined in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Grade B POPFs were found in 9 patients (15.3%). Using univariate analysis, the operative time, blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, day of drain removal, and hospital stay were shorter in the no-compression group than in the slow-compression group. Using multivariate analysis, the absence of POPFs was significantly more frequent in the no-compression group (odds ratio, 5.69; 95% CI, 1.241-26.109; P =0.025). The no-compression pancreatic dissection method was a simple method for reducing POPF incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The method of quickly dissecting the pancreas without compression yielded better results than the method of slowly dissecting the pancreas with slow compression. This quick dissection without compression was a simple and safe method that minimized postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, shortened the operative time and length of hospital stay, and reduced medical costs. Therefore, this method might be a clinically successful option.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Operative Time , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Fistula , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Dissection/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Fistula/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Staplers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
With the advancements in the medical field, many innovations in medical devices have happened. Using a surgical stapler to close the laryngectomy defect without opening the pharynx is particularly advantageous in a total laryngectomy (TL). However, performing the tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) during stapler closure of the larynx has not been widely advocated, due to the fear of complications related to the procedure.We treated two male patients with advanced glottic malignancy who underwent a TL. To restore their ability to speak, we performed a primary TEP and immediate voice prosthesis placement. After the TEP, we closed the larynx using a stapler. The surgical technique used in this procedure has been thoroughly explained.The use of a surgical stapler for pharyngeal closure during a TL has several advantages, particularly with regard to the duration of surgery. The current techniques appear to be promising in reducing TEP-related complications during stapler-assisted laryngeal closure.
Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms , Laryngectomy , Punctures , Trachea , Humans , Esophagus/surgery , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngectomy/methods , Laryngectomy/adverse effects , Larynx/surgery , Larynx, Artificial , Punctures/methods , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling/methods , Trachea/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Three types of circular staplers can be used to perform a colorectal anastomosis: two-row (MCS), three-row (TRCS) and powered (PCS) devices. The objective of this meta-analysis has been to provide the existing evidence on which of these circular staplers would have a lower risk of presenting a leak (AL) and/or anastomotic bleeding (AB). METHODS: An in-depth search was carried out in the electronic bibliographic databases Embase, PubMed and SCOPUS. Observational studies were included, since randomized clinical trials comparing circular staplers were not found. RESULTS: In the case of AL, seven studies met the inclusion criteria in the PCS group and four in the TRCS group. In the case of AB, only four studies could be included in the analysis in the PCS group. The AL OR reported for PCS was 0.402 (95%-confidence interval (95%-CI): 0.266-0.608) and for AB: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.08-0.52). The OR obtained for AL in TRCS was 0.446 (95%-CI: 0.217 to 0.916). Risk difference for AL in PCS was - 0.06 (95% CI: - 0.07 to - 0.04) and in TRCS was - 0.04 (95%-CI: - 0.08 to - 0.01). Subgroup analysis did not report significant differences between groups. On the other hand, the AB OR obtained for PCS was 0.2 (95% CI: 0.08-0.52). In this case, no significant differences were observed in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: PCS presented a significantly lower risk of leakage and anastomotic bleeding while TRCS only demonstrated a risk reduction in AL. Risk difference of AL was superior in the PCS than in TRCS.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Surgical Staplers , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A stapler is usually used for transection and closure of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy (DP) or central pancreatectomy (CP). When the pancreas is transected to the right of the portal vein, it is difficult to use a stapler and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) frequently occurs. We report on the efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) of the pancreatic stump for patients in whom stapler use is difficult. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP or CP were enrolled in this study. The pancreas was usually transected by a stapler, and ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) were used depending on the tumor situation. When using UCS, hand-sewn closure or PJ was performed for the pancreatic stump. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and the methods of pancreatic transection and closure were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 164 patients underwent DP or CP, and the pancreas was transected with a stapler in 150 patients and UCS in 14 patients. The rate of CR-POPF was higher and the postoperative hospital stay was longer in the UCS group than in the stapler group. PJ of the pancreatic stump, which was performed for 7 patients, did not worsen intraoperative factors. CR-POPF was not seen in these 7 patients, which was significantly less than that with hand-sewn closure. CONCLUSIONS: PJ of the pancreatic stump during DP or CP reduces CR-POPF compared with hand-sewn closure and may be useful especially when the pancreas is transected to the right of the portal vein.
Subject(s)
Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Fistula , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticojejunostomy , Humans , Pancreaticojejunostomy/methods , Pancreatectomy/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over , Surgical Stapling , Length of Stay , Surgical Staplers , Suture TechniquesABSTRACT
AIM: Creation of an overlapped anastomosis using handsewn sutures for common enterotomy is very popular in robotic right colectomy (RRC) with intracorpareal anastomosis (IA). The aim of this study is to present a simple method for constructing a sutureless overlapped anastomosis using a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material in RRC with IA. METHOD: The distal ileum and proximal colon were put in overlapping positions. Enterotomies were created 2 cm proximal to the ileal stump and 8 cm distal to the colonic stump on the antimesenteric side. Subsequently, a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material was inserted into each lumen and fired. Finally, the bowel was elevated while holding the bioabsorbable material, and the common enterotomy was grasped with the robotic instrument in the middle and closed using a linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material. RESULTS: This technique was applied to 10 patients with tumours of the caecum, ascending colon, or transverse colon. The median operating time, anastomosis construction time, blood loss, and postoperative stay were 281 min (range 228-459 min), 12 min (range 11-17 min), 10 mL (range 0-110 mL), and 10 days (range 8-15 days), respectively. No adverse intraoperative events were observed. Postoperatively, one patient developed chylous ascites, but there were no other complications. CONCLUSION: The simple technique for constructing a sutureless overlapped anastomosis using a 60 mm linear stapler with a reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis appears to be safe and feasible.
Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Anastomosis, Surgical , Colectomy , Colonic Neoplasms , Ileum , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgical Staplers , Colectomy/methods , Colectomy/instrumentation , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Ileum/surgery , Sutureless Surgical Procedures/methods , Sutureless Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Operative Time , Colon/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Surgical Stapling/methods , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Adult , Length of StayABSTRACT
AIM: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in left-sided colorectal surgery requires application of the circular stapler anvil to the proximal bowel without exteriorization through an additional abdominal incision. We describe an intracorporeal method to secure the stapler anvil, termed the intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar (IAAT) technique. METHOD: The ancillary trocar is attached to the stapler anvil before introduction into the abdominal cavity through the anal or vaginal orifice. The colon is incised before the trocar spike is brought out through the antimesenteric surface 3-4 cm within the cut edge. A linear stapler is used to seal the bowel end. The ancillary trocar is detached and retrieved via the NOSE conduit. Following the NOSE procedure, a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis is performed with the transanal circular stapler. RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients underwent elective left-sided colorectal resection with IAAT for NOSE (seven transanal, three transvaginal) from January to June 2023. Median age and body mass index were 66 (range 47-74) years and 24.3 (range 17.9-30.8) kg/m2 respectively. Two (20%) patients underwent sigmoid colectomy for sigmoid volvulus while eight (80%) underwent anterior resection for colorectal cancer. Median operating time, operative blood loss and postoperative length of hospital stay were 170 (range 140-240) min, 20 (range 10-40) mL and 1 (range 1-3) day respectively. There were no postoperative complications, readmissions or reoperations. Median follow-up duration was 3 (range 1-6) months. CONCLUSION: The IAAT double-stapling side-to-end anastomotic technique is safe and feasible for patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with NOSE, resulting in good outcomes.
Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Colectomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Aged , Male , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/instrumentation , Colectomy/methods , Colectomy/instrumentation , Colon/surgery , Surgical Instruments , Vagina/surgery , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling/methods , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Rectum/surgery , Operative TimeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Automatic staplers are often used to reconstruct the digestive tract during surgeries for gastric cancer. Intragastric free cancer cells adhering to automatic staplers may come in contact with the laparoscopic port area and progress to port site recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the presence/absence of cancer cells adhering to automatic staplers during gastric cancer surgery using cytological examinations. We further determined the positive predictive clinicopathological factors and clinical implications of free cancer cells attached to automatic staplers. METHODS: This study included 101 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Automatic staplers used for anastomosis in gastric cancer surgeries were shaken in 150 ml of saline solution to collect the attached cells. Papanicolaou stains were performed. We tested the correlation between cancer-cell positivity and clinicopathological factors to identify risk factors arising from the presence of attached cancer cells to the staplers. RESULTS: Based on the cytology, cancer cells were detected in 7 of 101 (6.9%) stapler washing fluid samples. Univariate analysis revealed that circular staplers, type 1 tumors, and positive lymph nodes were significantly associated with higher detection of free cancer cells adhering to staplers. No significant differences in other factors were detected. Of the seven cases with positive cytology, one developed anastomotic recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Exfoliated cancer cells adhered to the automatic staplers used for anastomoses in 6.9% of the staplers used for distal gastrectomies in patients with gastric cancer. Staplers used for gastric cancer surgeries should be handled carefully.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Gastrectomy , Anastomosis, Surgical , Gastroenterostomy , Surgical Staplers , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Colostomy , Surgical Staplers , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical , Abdomen , Abdominal MusclesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study explores the feasibility of coupling Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to a standard-of-care laparoscopic surgical stapler, stapler+EIT, with the long-term goal of enabling intraoperative tissue differentiation for tumor margin detection. METHODS: Two custom printed-circuit-board-based electrode arrays with 60 and 8 electrodes, respectively, matching the stapler geometry, served as the jaws of an electrode-integrated surrogate stapler+EIT device. The device was evaluated through a series of simulations and bench-top imaging experiments of agar-gel phantoms and bovine tissue samples to evaluate the technique and determine optimal imaging parameters. RESULTS: Electrodes localized to only one jaw (the 60-electrode side) of the stapler outperformed a dual-jaw distribution of electrodes. Using this one-sided electrode array, reconstructions achieved an Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) ≥ 0.94 for inclusions with conductivity contrasts of ≥30% for any size considered on measured agar-gel tests, and an AUC of 0.80 for bovine tissue samples. CONCLUSION: A stapler+EIT algorithm has been tuned and evaluated on challenging phantom tests and demonstrated to produce accurate reconstructions. SIGNIFICANCE: This work is an important step in the development of a surgical stapler+EIT technique for margin assessment.
Subject(s)
Surgical Staplers , Tomography , Animals , Cattle , Tomography/methods , Electric Impedance , Agar , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , ElectrodesABSTRACT
The suture thread used in digestive surgery must have several characteristics, including resistance to tension until the anastomosis coalescence, rapid absorption to avoid complications, biocompatibility and ease of handling. The preference is for monofilament polymers as they offer greater guarantees in biliary-digestive anastomoses. Suturing with synthetic polymers and mechanical devices such as staplers are the most suitable techniques. It is believed that staplers may become the gold standard technique in robotic surgery based on their experience and experimental data. In general, the goal is to use materials that minimize the risk of post-operative complications and offer maximum reliability in the anastomosis. KEY WORD: Suture material, Stapler.
Subject(s)
Polymers , Surgical Staplers , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Sutures , Suture TechniquesABSTRACT
PURPOSES: To compare the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) between Ethicon manual circular staplers (two-row) versus Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology (three-row) and between Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ Series technology (two-row) versus Tri-Staple™ technology. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal surgery 2019-2022 in U.S. Premier Healthcare Database to assess the risk of AL within 30 days post-index procedure. The study devices were Ethicon manual circular staplers, Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology, and Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology. RESULTS: Across 447 hospitals, the cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of AL within 30 days post-index procedure were 7.78% (6.91-8.74%) among 8337 patients in the Ethicon manual circular stapler cohort, 7.54% (6.87-8.27%) among 7928 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with DST™ technology cohort, and 8.19% (6.57-10.07%) among 1306 patients in the Medtronic EEA™ circular stapler with Tri-Staple™ technology cohort. Comparative analyses revealed no difference comparing Ethicon manual circular staplers with Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with Tri-Staple™ technology (risk ratio [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01) or comparing Medtronic EEA™ circular staplers with DST™ technology to Tri-Staple™ technology (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06). CONCLUSION: In this analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing a left-sided colorectal surgery from a U.S. hospital database, the risk of AL observed with manual two-row circular staplers was similar to that seen with three-row devices. This study affirms the safety of manual two-row circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis.
Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak , Colorectal Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Cohort Studies , Surgical Staplers/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Stapling/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Small circular staplers possess the advantage of being relatively easy to use when compared to larger circular staplers. However, there is some contention as to whether the use of small circular staples in colorectal surgery increases the incidence of anastomotic strictures. This study aimed to determine whether the frequency of anastomosis site stricture formation differs depending on stapler size when performing anastomosis in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for colon or rectal disease between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2021, and who had circular staplers used for the formation of intestinal anastomoses post colectomy were included in our study. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio using logistic regression was performed. The primary outcome was the anastomotic stricture rate, and the secondary outcome was total anastomotic complications. RESULTS: A total of 875 patients who were operated on by surgeons using 28/29-mm and 25-mm circular staplers were included. After propensity score matching, 106 patients were assigned to each group. Anastomotic strictures occurred in two cases (1.9%) from the 25-mm group and in four cases (3.8%) from the 28/29-mm group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.683). Anastomotic complications were observed in two cases (1.9%) from the 25-mm group and in six cases (5.7%) from the 28/29-mm group; no statistically significant differences were found (p = 0.280). CONCLUSION: Circular stapler size does not influence anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Surgery , Humans , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/epidemiology , Propensity Score , Surgical Staplers/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objetivos: La circuncisión es una de las intervenciones quirúrgicas más realizadas en cirugía pediátrica. Aunque la técnica con suturamanual (SMAN) se considera el gold standard, recientemente se handesarrollado dispositivos de sutura mecánica (SMEC) de fácil manejo ycon mejores resultados postoperatorios en la población adulta. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es comparar el tiempo quirúrgico y la incidencia decomplicaciones postoperatorias entre ambas técnicas en nuestro ámbito.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes circuncidados en nuestro centro entre octubre 2021 y diciembre 2022. Se analizóel tiempo quirúrgico y las complicaciones observadas en los primeros14 días postoperatorios (edema, hematoma, dehiscencia), en funciónde la técnica empleada (SMAN vs SMEC) y la edad de los pacientes(< 12 y ≥ 12 años). Resultados: Se incluyeron 173 pacientes (147 SMAN, 26 SMEC).El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente menor en los pacientes con SMEC, tanto en < 12 años (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0,002) comoen ≥ 12 años (23 min vs 12 min, p< 0,001). En cuanto a las complicaciones, los pacientes con SMEC del grupo ≥ 12 años presentaron menortasa de dehiscencia de sutura (23,5% vs 0%, p< 0,001), sin observarsediferencias significativas en el grupo de menor edad. Conclusiones: La circuncisión con SMEC es una técnica sencillay eficaz, que precisa un tiempo quirúrgico más reducido que la suturamanual, independientemente de la edad. Presenta menor tasa de complicaciones en los niños de mayor edad (≥ 12 años), por lo que se planteacomo una alternativa válida a la técnica clásica.(AU)
Objective: Circumcision is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric surgery. Even though manual suture (MANS) isregarded as the gold standard technique, easy-to-use mechanical suture(MECS) devices have been recently developed, with better postoperative results in the adult population. The objective of our study was tocompare the operating time and incidence of postoperative complicationsbetween both techniques in our environment.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of patients undergoing circumcision in our institution from October 2021 to December 2022was carried out. Operating time and complications observed in the first14 postoperative days (edema, hematoma, dehiscence) were analyzedaccording to the technique used (MANS vs. MECS) and patient age(< 12 and ≥12 years old).Results: 173 patients (147 MANS, 26 MECS) were included.Mean operating time was significantly lower in MECS patients, bothin patients < 12 years old (16 min vs. 10 min, p= 0.002) and in patients≥12 years old (23 min vs. 12 min, p< 0.001). Regarding complications,MECS patients ≥12 years old had a lower rate of suture dehiscence(23.5% vs. 0%, p< 0.001), with no significant differences in the youngergroup. Conclusions: MECS circumcision is a simple and effective technique involving shorter operating times than MANS circumcision, regardless of age. It has a lower rate of complications in older children (≥12years), which means it stands as a valid alternative to the conventionaltechnique.(AU)