Mark M. Ravitch MD: Surgeon, author, teacher, soldier.

Mark M. Ravitch (1910-1989) was the most prolific surgeon-author of the 20th Century as well as an outstanding clinical surgeon, scholar, historian, and researcher. While today he would not be considered a "pure pediatric surgeon," he was a charter member of the American Pediatric Surgical Association and received the William E. Ladd medal from the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Denis Brown Medal from the British Association of Pediatric Surgeons. He contributed to the treatment of benign colon and rectal disease, intussusception, and chest wall deformities. His most enduring contribution was surgical stapling, a technology that he brought from Russia during the Cold War that opened the door to minimally invasive surgery.

The History of Surgical Staplers: A Combination of Hungarian, Russian, and American Innovation.

Since their development in 1908, surgical staplers have been used as a method of "mechanical suturing" in efforts to divide hollow viscera and create anastomoses in an efficient and sterile manner. The concept for the surgical stapler was first developed by Humér Hultl, a Hungarian professor and surgeon, and designed by Victor Fischer, a Hungarian businessman and designer of surgical instruments. The design was highly acclaimed; however, it was bulky, cumbersome, and expensive to manufacture. In 1920, Aladár Petz, a student of Hultl, incorporated two innovations to the Fischer-Hultl stapler to create a more lightweight model, which was named the Petz clamp. In 1934, Friedrich of Ulm designed what would be the predecessor to the modern-day linear stapler. In the 1950s, Russian and American staplers began to emerge. Throughout the 1960s, a variety of stapling instruments were developed in the United States, manufactured by the United States Surgical Corporation. In the 1970s, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon brand joined the market. The United States Surgical Corporation was later bought by Tyco Healthcare and became Covidien in 2007. Through the collaboration of Felicien Steichen, Mark Ravitch, and Leon Hirsch, surgical staplers were further modified to incorporate interchangeable cartridges with various designs. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery began production of laparoscopic surgical staplers. Since its inception, the surgical stapler has provided a means to efficiently create safe and effective visceral and vascular anastomoses. The surgical stapler design continues to evolve while still maintaining the basic principles that were implemented in the original design.

Evolution in the surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease.

Hemorrhoidal disease is a very common condition requiring surgical management in approximately 10% of cases. Despite its long history and high prevalence, we are still trying to identify the best treatment. Earlier surgical approaches were soon abandoned and now only detain an historic significance. For long, proctologists have given their preference to hemorrhoidectomy that was gradually perfected through the years. The true innovation came in 1937, with the famous Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, still one of the leading interventions for treatment of hemorrhoids. Less fortune encountered alternative techniques, such as the Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy, and closed and semi-closed techniques. Later on, the advent of a new concept of the pathogenesis of hemorrhoidal disease has brought to the development of stapled prolassectomy techniques. This approach has encountered both supporters and detractors between the experts in this field and has received a strong impulse by the emerging trend towards "day-surgery". Today the search for the best surgical technique for hemorrhoidal disease is far from being over and witnesses the introduction of new techniques for hemorrhoidal dissection. The choice of the best strategy remains in the hands of the clinician in the modern conception of tailored surgery. KEY WORD: Hemorrhoidal disease, Hemorrhoidectomy, Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

The evolution of pelvic dissection for rectal cancer from blunt dissection to total mesorectal excision.

"Modern" rectal cancer treatment began in the 18th century. However, initial results of the pioneer surgeons were very poor. During the next several decades, significant progress was made towards the cure of rectal cancer. Improvements have included lowering mortality, reducing recurrence, and optimizing functional outcomes. This article reviews the individuals and their advancements in rectal cancer treatment. It describes the changes in the surgical approach for tumor resection, the study of the lymphatic spread of rectal cancer and the advances in sphincter preservation procedures from the era of blunt dissection until the paradigm changing revolution of total mesorectal excision.

[Félicien M. Steichen. M.D., F.A.C.S. (1926-2011). Portrait of a surgeon]. / Félicien M. Steichen, M.D., F.A.C.S. (1926-2011). Portrait d'un chirurgien.

The personality and the achievements of Professor Dr. Félicien M. Steichen, who was born in Luxembourg (10.13.1926) and died in Brignogan-Plages, France (6.27.2011) are brought into focus. His was a most distinguished career devoted to surgery, research, teaching and writing in Baltimore, Pittsburgh and New York. He will be remembered above all for his contributions to stapling in thoracic and abdominal surgery and to minimally invasive surgery.

Suturing methods and materials with special emphasis on the jaws of giant ants (an old-new surgical instrument).

The historical development of surgical sutures, ligatures, and staples is discussed. The use of the jaws of giant ants, especially in the suturing of bowel injuries, is documented.

Circular vascular stapling in coronary surgery.

Stapling devices have been clinically applied to connect blood vessels. The early application of these staplers in cardiovascular surgery, including coronary bypass surgery, was encouraging. With further refinement of suture material, however, vascular staplers became impractical and soon fell into oblivion. With advancement in robotic surgery, these devices might become valuable tools once again. Herein early experience with vascular circular stapling devices is reviewed.

[History of mechanical sutures in digestive system surgery]. / Storia della sutura con dispositivi meccanici nella chirurgia dell'apparato digerente.

The attempts to suture wounds with mechanical device are very old, and their history is lost in the night of times. But more recently--that means less than two century ago--already before the true initial beginning of the modern surgery, after the birth of anaesthesiology with the "ether day--16 october 1846" there have been many efforts to develop new methods to join the tissue of the gut avoiding the danger of peritoneal contamination. The primitive tools of these ancient stapler were founded on the principle to compress with mechanical devices the two sides of the tissue to join. Very early in the past century, well before the appearance of the antibiotics, in the heart of the old Europe were developed and perfectionated devices able to join the intestinal tissue with metallic stitches: the primitive staplers. But after the end of the second world war the development has become bursting, with the progress of the Sovietic Institute of experimental research on surgical tools of Moscow and then with the mighty initiatives of the industrial power in the USA. The more important progress in this field was founded on the standardization of tools designed to fix metallic stitches on the gut, but very recently there are new attempts to use the more old principle of compression-suture on new basis. The results of this development, essential for modern surgery, are the standardization of the surgical technique, the shortening of operative times, and an important support to the new mininvasive approach to digestive surgery.

The history of thoracic surgical instruments and instrumentation.

Thoracic surgical practice has evolved from the innovations of its pioneers. Beginning with the stethoscope discovered by Laënnec with his system of auscultation, to the tools we use in the dissection and control of the hilum of the lung for resection, our practice of thoracic surgery has been entwined with the development of instruments and instrumentation. The development of strategies to prevent death from the open pneumothorax began with manual control of the mediastinum and progressed through differential pressure to, finally, the technique of intubation and the methods of positive-pressure and insufflation anesthesia. The instruments we place in our hands are not enough to define our art. Entry into the chest would not be possible without the use of rib retractors, rib shears, and even periosteal elevators. Finally, to the present day of minimally invasive techniques and the application of thoracoscopy for therapeutic purposes, we find the efforts of our predecessors well developed. For the progression from the fear of the open pneumothorax to the present-day state of the ease of thoracotomy for lung resection we are indebted to those who gave so much of their time and, for some, their lives to death from tuberculosis, to allow the advancement of our practice of surgery. These great people should be remembered not only for their acceptance of novel ideas but also, more importantly, for their lack of fear of testing them.

Historical aspects of laparoscopic hernia repair.

The history of the surgical treatment of groin hernias is reviewed with emphasis on the events leading to the introduction and development of the management of these hernias by a laparoscopic approach. The reasons for a shift from an inguinal to an abdominal approach are presented, and the early results of the latter are considered together with the possible advantages and disadvantages. Both methods rely on the use of small or large pieces of mesh that replace the previous bulwark of hernia repairs, namely the rearrangement of tissue layers. Currently, the challenge of the laparoscopic approach is being met by those espousing the inguinal approach.

Surgical staplers: a review.

For almost two centuries, surgeons have been using mechanical devices to join tissue. One of the most successful methods is that of stapling, which has become very common in more recent times. The range of staplers consists of five established stapler categories (circular, linear, linear cutting, ligating and skin staplers), along with recent variations which lend themselves to minimally invasive surgery. Within each category, several commercial models are available, many of which have their own unique features. The procedures which are enhanced by these instruments are many and varied. Applications have been further expanded and improved by the instrument design developments seen in recent years. This review attempts to present a rationalized overview of the array of stapling instruments, with relevant procedures. The authors believe that surgical stapling may be greatly enhanced by further research and development, taking the instrument designs and procedures further into the realm of minimally invasive surgery.

Stapling instruments for intestinal anastomosis in colorectal surgery.

The circular stapling instrument has had a major impact in the practice of colorectal surgery. Stapling technology was pioneered in the early part of this century and subsequently modified. Russian initiatives led to development of the original circular stapling instrument and further progress has resulted in instruments that are widely available, reliable and totally disposable. Mechanical failure is now rare and malfunction is generally due to operator error. Complications related to the stapling technique are uncommon, although anastomotic stricture may be more frequent than when handsewn anastomosis is performed. A stapling instrument facilitates and may expedite a surgical procedure but it is an adjunct to, and not a substitute for, meticulous surgical technique.