Position statement of the Brazilian society of Rheumatology on mesna use as a preventive therapy for bladder disease in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases and systemic vasculitis under cyclophosphamide treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To review current literature to support the use of mesna as a preventive therapy for hemorrhagic cystitis and bladder cancer in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases and systemic vasculitis treated with cyclophosphamide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search for articles was conducted systematically through MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Only articles in English were selected. For available records, titles and abstracts were selected independently by two investigators. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were selected for analysis. The known adverse effects of cyclophosphamide were hematological toxicity, infections, gonadal toxicity, teratogenicity, increased risk for malignancy and hemorrhagic cystitis. Long-term toxicity was highly dependent on cyclophosphamide cumulative dose. The risk of bladder cancer is especially higher in long-term exposure and with cumulative doses above 36 g. The risk remains high for years after drug discontinuation. Hemorrhagic cystitis is highly correlated with cumulative dose and its incidence ranges between 12 and 41%, but it seems to be lower with new regimens with reduced cyclophosphamide dose. No randomized controlled trials were found to analyze the use of mesna in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases and systemic vasculitis. Retrospective studies yielded conflicting results. Uncontrolled prospective studies with positive results were considered at high risk of bias. No evidence was found to support the use of mesna during the treatment with cyclophosphamide for autoimmune diseases or systemic vasculitis to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis and bladder cancer. In the scenarios of high cumulative cyclophosphamide dose (i.e., > 30 g), patients with restricted fluid intake, neurogenic bladder, therapy with oral anticoagulants, and chronic kidney disease, mesna could be considered. CONCLUSION: The current evidence was found to be insufficient to support the routine use of mesna for the prophylaxis of hemorrhagic cystitis and bladder cancer in patients being treated for systemic autoimmune diseases and systemic vasculitis with cyclophosphamide. The use may be considered for selected cases.

Eficácia e segurança de Rituximabe comparado a outras drogas no tratamento de vasculites sistêmicas: revisão rápida de evidências / Efficacy and safety of Rituximab compared to other drugs in the treatment of systemic vasculitides: rapid response review of evidence

Objetivo: descrever as evidências disponíveis na literatura científica sobre eficácia e segurança do rituximabe comparado a diferentes tratamentos. Materiais e métodos: é uma revisão rápida de evidências científicas para tomada de decisão informada por evidências em políticas e práticas de saúde. Conclusão: o Rituximabe tem eficácia e segurança similares à da Ciclofosfamida, para terapia de indução de remissão e para manutenção da remissão e, para pacientes com doença recidivante, o Rituximabe é mais eficaz que a Ciclofosfamida para manter a remissão. Para terapia de manutenção, Rituximabe é mais eficaz que Azatioprina, com perfil de segurança similar. Diferentes regimes de dosagem do Rituximabe tem eficácia e segurança similar para terapia de manutenção. O Infliximabe parece ser superior ao Rituximabe nos desfechos de eficácia (indução e manutenção da remissão).

Objective: to describe the evidence available in the scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of rituximab compared to different treatments. Materials and Methods: is a rapid review of scientific evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice. Conclusion: Rituximab has similar efficacy and safety to Cyclophosphamide, for remission induction therapy and for maintenance of remission, and for patients with relapsing disease, Rituximab is more effective than Cyclophosphamide in maintaining remission. For maintenance therapy, Rituximab is more effective than Azathioprine, with a similar safety profile. Different dosing regimens of Rituximab have similar efficacy and safety for maintenance therapy. Infliximab appears to be superior to Rituximab in efficacy outcomes (induction and maintenance of remission).

Síndrome de Behçet ou úlcera de Lipschütz: desafio diagnóstico / Behçet's syndrome or Lipschütz ulcer: diagnostic challenge

A ocorrência de úlceras genitais em adolescentes e mulheres jovens tem impacto emocional para as pacientes e seus familiares, pela frequente associação com uma possível etiologia de transmissão sexual. Porém, úlcera de Lipschütz e síndrome de Behçet não têm etiologia infecciosa e devem ser lembradas como possíveis diagnósticos diferenciais. O diagnóstico dessas duas patologias é clínico e pode ser desafiador. Dessa forma, foi realizada uma revisão na literatura com o objetivo de comparar as duas entidades. A úlcera de Lipschütz é causada por uma vasculite local e caracteriza-se pelo surgimento súbito de úlceras na vulva ou vagina inferior. Já a doença de Behçet é causada por vasculite sistêmica, com episódios de remissão e exacerbação, que pode envolver quase todos os sistemas orgânicos. Em ambos os casos, é essencial o referenciamento para reumatologia. O tratamento objetiva suprimir exacerbações, controlar a dor e prevenir infecção secundária.(AU)

The occurrence of genital ulcers in adolescents and young women have an emotional impact for the patient and their families, due to the frequent association of its etiology with a sexually transmitted disease. However, Lipschütz ulcer and Behçet's syndrome do not have an infectious etiology and should be remembered as a possible differential diagnoses. As the diagnosis of these two pathologies is clinical and can be challenging, a review of literature was carried out. The objective of this review of literature was to compare both diseases. Lipschütz ulcer is caused by local vasculitis and is characterized by the sudden appearance of ulcers in the vulva or lower vagina. Behçet's syndrome is caused by systemic vasculitis, with episodes of remission and exacerbation, which can affect almost all organ systems. In both cases, referral to rheumatology is essential. Treatment aims to suppress exacerbations, control pain and prevent secondary infection.(AU)

Enfrentamiento de las vasculitis primarias / Clinical aspects of primary vasculitis

Las Vasculitis Primarias son enfermedades poco frecuentes, potencialmente fatales, sin causa etiológica conocida, que pueden comprometer a vasos sanguíneos de distinto tamaño, produciéndoles un proceso inflamatorio en la pared vascular, que conduce a la estrechez u obstrucción del vaso afectado, con consecuente isquemia o necrosis del tejido que irrigan. Sus manifestaciones clínicas pueden ser muy variadas, y frecuentemente inespecíficas. Sin embargo hay algunas que hacen sospechar el diagnóstico y que deben ser evaluadas con detalle. El estudio diagnóstico de las vasculitis primarias, implica varios aspectos que deben ser considerados. La actividad, la extensión, el daño visceral y el diagnóstico diferencial. En este sentido los exámenes bioquímicos; los exámenes funcionales organicos; los estudios de imágenes (radiológicos, tomografía computarizadas, resonancia magnética, radio isotópicas, y de Pet -CT); y la histopatología (biopsias de riñón, sistema nervioso periférico, pulmonar, etc.); y los estudios de autoanticuerpos (muy especialmente los ANCA, en vasculitis de pequeño vaso) ayudan a fundamentar el diagnóstico definitivo. Su tratamiento debe considerar dos etapas. Inicialmente la terapia de inducción de la remisión, y luego de lograrla, la de mantenimiento de la remisión. De la naturaleza de la vasculitis y del éxito que se logre con el tratamiento, dependerá su pronóstico. Las drogas tradicionales, más usadas en el tratamiento, y habitualmente más efectivas, son los corticoesteroides (orales o EV en bolos) y la ciclofosfamida (oral o preferentemente en bolos EV). Tambien se han usado la Azatioprina, el metotrexato, y el micofenolato mofetil, especialmente como mantenimiento de remisión. En los últimos años, se ha destacado el uso de terapia biológica, con anticuerpos monoclonales anti lifocitos B, el Rituximab, que resulta de gran utilidad, muy especialmente en las vasculitis de pequeño vaso ANCA positivo. El diagnóstico diferencial incluye patologías muy diversas; trombosis ateroesclerótica; embolias ateroescleróticas, embolias sépticas, el uso de drogas ilícitas, y la trombosis secundaria al Sindrome Antifosfolípido.

Primary vasculitis is an infrecuent desease, and may present in very different clinical pictures. Any size of blood vessels can be affected (aorta, large it; arteries, médium -size, and small), it may be produced by immunological tissue damage mechanisms. Classification of primary vasculitis usually consider both aspects. Histopathology includes, giant cells large vasculitis; granulomatous aortitis; systemic inflamatory necrotizing and segmentary médium size arterities; Granomalous necrotazing small vessel vasculitis, with or without eosinofilic infiltration; and leucocitoclastic small vessel vasculitis. Clinicians should be awared of this deseases in order to diagnose promptly and do a proper therapy.

Protective effects of carvedilol on systemic vascular damage induced by angiotensin II: organ-specific effects independent of antihypertensive effects.

BACKGROUND: The protective effect of carvedilol on multiple organ damage induced by angiotensin II (Ang II) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of carvedilol on the heart, liver, and kidney in rats infused with Ang II. MATERIAL/METHODS: Wistar rats were randomly distributed into three groups: control (no treatment), continuously infused with Ang II (150 etag/min for 72 hr), and treated with Ang II + carvedilol (90 mg/kg/d). Histological sections of the myocardium, kidney, and liver were analyzed for the presence of necrosis. RESULTS: Ang II induced arterial hypertension which was not affected by carvedilol treatment (tail-cuff blood pressures, control: 125+/-13.6, Ang II: 163+/-27.3, Ang II + CV: 178+/-39.8 mmHg, p<0.05). Also, there were perivascular inflammation and necrosis in the myocardium, kidney, and hepatocytes necrosis around the terminal vein. Carvedilol treatment fully prevented damage to the heart and kidney and attenuated liver lesions induced by the Ang II infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of carvedilol on perivascular damage induced by Ang II infusion depended on the target organ. The prevention of heart damage occurred independently of the antihypertensive effects of carvedilol.