Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.047
Filter
1.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e25, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725380

ABSTRACT

The growing global focus on and sense of urgency toward improving healthcare environmental sustainability and moving to low-carbon and resilient healthcare systems is increasingly mirrored in discussions of the role of health technology assessment (HTA). This Perspective considers how HTA can most effectively contribute to these goals and where other policy tools may be more effective in driving sustainability, especially given the highly limited pool of resources available to conduct environmental assessments within HTA. It suggests that HTA might most productively focus on assessing those technologies that have intrinsic characteristics which may cause specific environmental harms or vulnerabilities, while the generic environmental impacts of most other products may be better addressed through other policy and regulatory mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Conservation of Natural Resources , Environment , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration
2.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e28, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738417

ABSTRACT

In 2019, the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in Korea established a health technology reassessment (HTR) system to manage the life cycle of health technologies and develop operational measures promoting the efficient use of healthcare resources. The purpose of this study is to introduce the detailed implementation process and practical functional methods of the HTR implemented by NECA.The HTR is a structured multidisciplinary method for analyzing health technologies currently used in the healthcare system based on the latest information on parameters, such as clinical safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of optimizing the use of healthcare resources as well as social and ethical issues. All decision-making stages of the HTR are carefully reviewed and transparently managed. The HTR committee makes significant decisions, and the subcommittee decides the details related to the assessment process.Since the pilot began in 2018, 262 cases have been reassessed, of which, 126 cases (48.1 percent) were health services not covered by the National Health Insurance (NHI). Over the past 5 years, approximately 130 recommendations for the in-use technologies were determined by the HTR committee. In the near future, it will be necessary to officially develop and establish a Korean HTR system and a legal foundation to optimize the NHI system.


Subject(s)
Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Republic of Korea , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration
3.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e29, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654522

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to explore procedures and methods used at health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for assessing medical devices and the underlying views of HTA practitioners about appropriate methodology to identify challenges in adopting new methodologies for assessing devices. We focused on the role of normative commitments of HTA practitioners in the adoption of new methods. METHODS: An online survey, including questions on procedures, scoping, and assessments of medical devices, was sent to members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Interviews were conducted with survey respondents and HTA practitioners involved in assessments of transcatheter aortic valve implantation to gain an in-depth understanding of choices made and views about assessing medical devices. Survey and interview questions were inspired by the "values in doing assessments of health technologies" approach towards HTA, which states that HTA addresses value-laden questions and information. RESULTS: The current practice of assessing medical devices at HTA agencies is predominantly based on procedures, methods, and epistemological principles developed for assessments of drugs. Both practical factors (available time, demands of decision-makers, existing legal frameworks, and HTA guidelines), as well as commitments of HTA practitioners to principles of evidence-based medicine, make the adoption of a new methodology difficult. CONCLUSIONS: There is a broad recognition that assessments of medical devices may need changes in HTA methodology. In order to realize this, the HTA community may require both a discussion on the role, responsibility, and goals of HTA, and resulting changes in institutional context to adopt new methodologies.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Qualitative Research , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/standards , Humans , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Decision Making , Interviews as Topic , Evidence-Based Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
4.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e24, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional therapies are crucial in maintaining and improving human well-being. China's healthcare policymakers are attempting to use health technology assessment (HTA) as a decision-making supportive tool. The value assessment framework for Chinese patent medicine (CPM) has been developed and is being adopted and validated widely by research institutions. Subsequently, the healthcare decision-makers particularly hanker for the value framework of traditional non-pharmacological therapies. METHODS: To construct a practical value framework for traditional non-pharmacological therapies, a scoping review methodology was adopted to identify the evaluation domains and obstacles. A search, screening, and analysis process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Evidence was retrieved from scientific databases and HTA agencies' websites. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 5 guidelines records and 17 acupuncture HTA reports. By synthesizing the valuable reports of CPM and acupuncture evaluation in representative countries, this study found that Mainland China was promoting the comprehensive value assessment of CPM, whereas the United Kingdom, Singapore, Canada, the United States, and Malaysia had carried out the HTA evaluation of acupuncture for various conditions among which chronic pain was the most common. UK and Singapore applied the HTA results to support acupuncture reimbursement decisions. Three domains, including safety, effectiveness, and economy, were commonly adopted. The identified biggest challenge of evaluating traditional non-pharmacological therapies is the scarce high-quality clinical evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified value domains and issues of traditional therapies, and pointed out future research implications, to promote the development value framework of traditional therapies.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Complementary Therapies , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Decision Making , Cost-Benefit Analysis
5.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e21, 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576122

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop a framework for establishing priorities in the regional health service of Murcia, Spain, to facilitate the creation of a comprehensive multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. This framework will aid in decision-making processes related to the assessment, reimbursement, and utilization of high-impact health technologies. METHOD: Based on the results of a review of existing frameworks for MCDA of health technologies, a set of criteria was proposed to be used in the context of evaluating high-impact health technologies. Key stakeholders within regional healthcare services, including clinical leaders and management personnel, participated in a focus group (n = 11) to discuss the proposed criteria and select the final fifteen. To elicit the weights of the criteria, two surveys were administered, one to a small sample of healthcare professionals (n = 35) and another to a larger representative sample of the general population (n = 494). RESULTS: The responses obtained from health professionals in the weighting procedure exhibited greater consistency compared to those provided by the general public. The criteria more highly weighted were "Need for intervention" and "Intervention outcomes." The weights finally assigned to each item in the multicriteria framework were derived as the equal-weighted sum of the mean weights from the two samples. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-attribute function capable of generating a composite measure (multicriteria) to assess the value of high-impact health interventions has been developed. Furthermore, it is recommended to pilot this procedure in a specific decision context to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, usefulness, and reliability of the proposed tool.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Spain , Focus Groups , Health Priorities , Decision Making , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult
6.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 40(1): e22, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629196

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The rising costs of drugs have necessitated the exploration of innovative payment methods in healthcare systems. Risk-sharing agreements (RSAs) have been implemented in many countries as a value-based payment mechanism to manage the uncertainty associated with expensive technologies. This study aimed to investigate stakeholder perspectives on value-based payment in the Singaporean context, providing insights for future directions in health technology assessment and financing. METHODS: This descriptive qualitative inquiry involved participant interviews conducted between October 2021 and April 2022. Thematic analysis was conducted in two phases to analyze the interview transcripts. RESULTS: Seventeen respondents participated in the study, and five key themes emerged from the analysis. Stakeholders viewed RSAs as moderately positive, despite limited experience with them. They emphasized the importance of clearly defining objectives and establishing transparent criteria for implementing these schemes. The current data infrastructure was identified as both a barrier and facilitator, as RSAs impose administrative burdens. To successfully implement these payment mechanisms, capacity building, and effective stakeholder engagement that fosters mutual trust and cocreation are crucial. CONCLUSION: This study confirms previously identified barriers and facilitators to successful RSA implementation while contextualizing them within the Singaporean setting. The findings suggest that value-based payment has the potential to address uncertainty and improve access to healthcare technologies, but these barriers must be addressed for the schemes to be effective.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Stakeholder Participation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Singapore , Humans , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Risk Sharing, Financial/organization & administration , Interviews as Topic
8.
Value Health ; 25(3): 340-349, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically review recent health economic evaluations (HEEs) of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare. The aim was to discuss pertinent methods, reporting quality and challenges for future implementation of AI in healthcare, and additionally advise future HEEs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted in 2 databases (PubMed and Scopus) for articles published in the last 5 years. Two reviewers performed independent screening, full-text inclusion, data extraction, and appraisal. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Philips checklist were used for the quality assessment of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 884 unique studies were identified; 20 were included for full-text review, covering a wide range of medical specialties and care pathway phases. The most commonly evaluated type of AI was automated medical image analysis models (n = 9, 45%). The prevailing health economic analysis was cost minimization (n = 8, 40%) with the costs saved per case as preferred outcome measure. A total of 9 studies (45%) reported model-based HEEs, 4 of which applied a time horizon >1 year. The evidence supporting the chosen analytical methods, assessment of uncertainty, and model structures was underreported. The reporting quality of the articles was moderate as on average studies reported on 66% of Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards items. CONCLUSIONS: HEEs of AI in healthcare are limited and often focus on costs rather than health impact. Surprisingly, model-based long-term evaluations are just as uncommon as model-based short-term evaluations. Consequently, insight into the actual benefits offered by AI is lagging behind current technological developments.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence/economics , Economics, Medical/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Data Accuracy , Economics, Medical/standards , Humans , Models, Economic , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Research Design , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/standards
9.
Value Health ; 25(1): 91-103, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35031104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Since 2015, Zorginstituut Nederland (ZIN) has linked disease severity ranges of 0.10 to 0.40, 0.41 to 0.70, and 0.71 to 1.00 with willingness-to-pay (WTP) reference values of €20 000, €50 000, and €80 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. We sought to review whether these changes have affected ZIN health technology assessment (HTA) outcomes for specialist and outpatient drugs. METHODS: ZIN recommendations for specialist and outpatient drugs published between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, that included a pharmacoeconomic report were reviewed. Data were extracted on disease severity, proportional shortfall calculation, reported WTP reference value, outcomes related to the cost-effectiveness of the product, budget impact, and ZIN's recommendation including rationale for their advice. RESULTS: A total of 51 HTAs were included. Of the 20 HTAs published before June 2015, a total of 9 received positive recommendations, 7 were conditionally reimbursed, and 4 received negative recommendations. None reported WTP reference values. Of the 31 evaluations published after June 2015, a total of 4 products received positive recommendations, 1 was conditionally approved, and 26 received negative recommendations initially. Most products (65%) reported disease severity to be >0.70. CONCLUSIONS: Since 2015, most products have fallen within the highest category of disease severity. Although pre-2015 outcomes were varied, post-2015 products overwhelmingly received negative recommendations, and the proportion of products for which price negotiations were recommended has increased. These differences in outcomes may result from the introduction of an explicit WTP reference value, whether or not in combination with the severity-adjusted ranges, but may also reflect other national policy changes in 2015.


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Severity of Illness Index , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Inpatients , Netherlands , Outpatients , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
10.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 2022. 256 f p. tab, fig, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1401266

ABSTRACT

A Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde (ATS) respalda políticas públicas na gestão de tecnologias em diversos países. Sua relevância vem sendo ampliada no atual contexto de custos crescentes e recursos escassos com que os sistemas de saúde convivem. Ao proporcionar decisões embasadas nas melhores evidências disponíveis, centrada nas necessidades dos pacientes e das sociedades, considerando benefícios, riscos e custos das tecnologias a serem incorporadas, favorece a alocação mais racional dos recursos escassos. No Brasil, foi principalmente a partir do ano 2000 que a institucionalização da ATS avançou. Em 2009, foi publicada a Política Nacional de Gestão Tecnologias em Saúde (PNGTS), com os objetivos de maximizar os benefícios de saúde a serem obtidos com os recursos disponíveis, e de promover as diretrizes e orientações a todos os atores que participam das atividades de ATS no País. O Ministério da Saúde (MS) capitaneou esse processo que culminou em 2011 com a promulgação da Lei 12.401/11, que instituiu a Comissão Nacional para Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC). Entre outras instituições, a Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) participou ativamente dos comitês do MS voltados para implementação da ATS. No entanto, mesmo diante de uma política única, o sistema público e a saúde suplementar trilharam diferentes caminhos nesse processo. O objetivo desta tese consistiu em descrever e analisar a institucionalização da ATS na saúde suplementar brasileira, observando as consonâncias e dissonâncias existentes entre os setores público e privado neste processo e identificando as possíveis consequências para o sistema de saúde. Para tanto, se valeu de método qualitativo, tendo como principais fontes de evidências, a revisão bibliográfica, a análise documental e entrevistas semiestruturadas com atores-chaves, escolhidos por terem participado do processo, ativamente, em diferentes momentos e áreas de atuação. Os resultados indicam que diversos fatores contribuíram para uma maior morosidade na institucionalização da ATS na saúde suplementar, como, por exemplo: questões políticas internas e externas à ANS; o comportamento do mercado das empresas operadoras de planos e seguros privados de saúde; além de interferências diretas dos Poderes Executivo e Legislativo nas atividades de incorporação de tecnologias da ANS. Como consequências da dicotomia público privada na implementação das políticas públicas de ATS foram sinalizadas, principalmente, a ineficiência e retrabalho nos processos de incorporação de tecnologias, e o aumento das inequidades no acesso às tecnologias no sistema de saúde. Conclui-se que muitos são os desafios inerentes a implementação de políticas públicas de ATS nos diversos países, e também aqui, dado que estas perpassam por interesses conflitantes dos diferentes stakeholders que atuam no sistema. Contudo, os resultados dessa tese apontam para as vantagens de se almejar uma política única e sólida de ATS no País, que privilegie o fortalecimento da utilização das evidências científicas nas difíceis escolhas que permeiam a área da saúde.


Health Technology Assessment (HTA) supports public policies in the management of technologies in several countries. Its relevance has been increasing in the current context of rising costs and scarce resources with which health systems coexist. By providing decisions based on the best available evidence, centered on the needs of patients and societies, considering the benefits, risks, and costs of the technologies to be incorporated, it favors a more rational allocation of scarce resources. In Brazil, it was mainly from the year 2000 that the institutionalization of HTA advanced. In 2009, the National Policy on Health Technology Management (PNGTS, in the Portuguese acronym) was published, with the objective of maximizing the health benefits to be obtained with the available resources and promoting guidelines to all actors who participate in the activities of HTA in the country. The Ministry of Health (MS) led this process that culminated in 2011 with the enactment of Law 12,401/11, which established the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the Unified Health System (CONITEC, in the Portuguese acronym). Among other institutions, the National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance (ANS) actively participated in the MS committees focused on the implementation of HTA. However, even in the face of a single policy, the public system and the private health insurance sector followed different paths in this process. The objective of this thesis was to describe and analyze the institutionalization of HTA in Brazilian private health insurance sector, observing the existing consonances and dissonances between the public and private sectors in this process and identifying the possible consequences for the health system. For that, it used a qualitative method, using as main sources of evidence, the bibliographic review, document analysis and semi-structured interviews with key actors, chosen for having participated in the process, actively, at different times and areas of activity. The results indicate that several factors contributed to a greater delay in the institutionalization of HTA in the private health insurance sector, such as: internal and external political issues to the ANS; the market behavior of companies operating private health plans and insurance; in addition to direct interference by the Executive and Legislative Powers in the activities of incorporation of technologies by ANS. As a consequence of the public-private dichotomy in the implementation of public HTA policies, the inefficiency and rework in the technology incorporation processes, and the increase in inequities in access to technologies in the health system, were signaled. It is concluded that there are many challenges inherent to the implementation of public HTA policies in different countries, and also here, given that they permeate conflicting interests of the different stakeholders that work in the system. However, the results of this thesis point to the advantages of aiming for a single and solid HTA policy in the country, which privileges the strengthening of the use of scientific evidence in the difficult choices that permeate the healthcare area.


Subject(s)
Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Public Sector , Private Sector , Supplemental Health , Health Policy , Unified Health System , Brazil , Qualitative Research
11.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37(1): e77, 2021 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269171

ABSTRACT

Emergency preparedness is a continuous quality improvement process through which roles and responsibilities are defined to effectively anticipate, respond to, and recover from the impact of emergencies. This process results in documented plans that provide a backbone structure for developing the core capacities to address health threats. Nevertheless, several barriers can impair an effective preparedness planning, as it needs a 360° perspective to address each component according to the best evidence and practice. Preparedness planning shares common principles with health technology assessment (HTA) as both encompass a multidisciplinary and multistakeholder approach, follow an iterative cycle, adopt a 360° perspective on the impact of intervention measures, and conclude with decision-making support. Our "Perspective" illustrates how each HTA domain can address different component(s) of a preparedness plan that can indeed be seen as a container of multiple HTAs, which can then be used to populate the entire plan itself. This approach can allow one to overcome preparedness barriers, providing an independent, systematic, and robust tool to address the components and ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of their value in the mitigation of the impact of emergencies.


Subject(s)
Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Civil Defense/economics , Civil Defense/standards , Disaster Planning/economics , Disaster Planning/standards , Evidence-Based Practice/standards , Humans
13.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e22, 2021 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455592

ABSTRACT

Over the past few years, there has been an increasing recognition of the value of public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) to ensure the legitimacy and fairness of public funding decisions [Street J, Stafinski T, Lopes E, Menon D. Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:87-95]. However, important challenges remain, in particular, how to reorient HTA to reflect public priorities. In a recent international survey of thirty HTA agencies conducted by the International Network of Agencies for HTA (INAHTA), public engagement in HTA was listed as one of the "Top 10" challenges for HTA agencies [O'Rourke B, Werko SS, Merlin T, Huang LY, Schuller T. The "Top 10" challenges for health technology assessment: INAHTA viewpoint. Int J Technol Assess. 2020;36:1-4].Historically, Australia has been at the forefront of the application of HTA for assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new health technologies to inform public funding decisions. However, current HTA processes in Australia lack meaningful public inputs. Using Australia as an example, we describe this important limitation and discuss the potential impact of this gap on the health system and future directions.


Subject(s)
Capital Financing , Decision Making , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/economics , Australia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration
14.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 129: 138-150, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32980429

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to present the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) conceptual approach to the assessment of certainty of evidence from modeling studies (i.e., certainty associated with model outputs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Expert consultations and an international multidisciplinary workshop informed development of a conceptual approach to assessing the certainty of evidence from models within the context of systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and health care decisions. The discussions also clarified selected concepts and terminology used in the GRADE approach and by the modeling community. Feedback from experts in a broad range of modeling and health care disciplines addressed the content validity of the approach. RESULTS: Workshop participants agreed that the domains determining the certainty of evidence previously identified in the GRADE approach (risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, reporting bias, magnitude of an effect, dose-response relation, and the direction of residual confounding) also apply when assessing the certainty of evidence from models. The assessment depends on the nature of model inputs and the model itself and on whether one is evaluating evidence from a single model or multiple models. We propose a framework for selecting the best available evidence from models: 1) developing de novo, a model specific to the situation of interest, 2) identifying an existing model, the outputs of which provide the highest certainty evidence for the situation of interest, either "off-the-shelf" or after adaptation, and 3) using outputs from multiple models. We also present a summary of preferred terminology to facilitate communication among modeling and health care disciplines. CONCLUSION: This conceptual GRADE approach provides a framework for using evidence from models in health decision-making and the assessment of certainty of evidence from a model or models. The GRADE Working Group and the modeling community are currently developing the detailed methods and related guidance for assessing specific domains determining the certainty of evidence from models across health care-related disciplines (e.g., therapeutic decision-making, toxicology, environmental health, and health economics).


Subject(s)
GRADE Approach , Systematic Reviews as Topic/standards , Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Professional Competence/standards , Publication Bias , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration
15.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e11, 2020 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33353568

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The Ministry of Health in Québec requested the National Institute of Excellence in Health and Social Services to produce clinical and implementation recommendations for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease. OBJECTIVES: (i) Describe the process of trialing different modalities of patient engagement as a means to integrate a diversity of patient perspectives and (ii) Describe the learning process of INESSS regarding the integration of the patient perspective. METHODOLOGY: All documents were analyzed, and a survey with all advisory committee members and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were conducted. Each interview was transcribed verbatim and imported into QDA miner software for the purposes of analysis. Data analysis was carried out concurrently with data collection to allow for an iterative approach between data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Five methods to integrate the perspectives of patients were used: (i) interviews with patients, (ii) inclusion of patient partners within the advisory committee, (iii) literature review, (iv) focus groups with one patient association, and (v) feedback from patient associations on recommendations intended for decision makers and other targeted stakeholders. The patient partners influenced decisions by sharing their experiential knowledge. The patient interviews and the literature review added an in-depth perspective on the disease and experience with the healthcare system. The patient association members shared their perspectives and helped disseminate the recommendation to sustain a practice change. CONCLUSION: The combination of methods to collect and integrate patients' knowledge and patient associations' perspectives helped develop a comprehensive understanding of a controversial object of evaluation.


Subject(s)
Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/drug therapy , Patient Participation/methods , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Decision Making , Formative Feedback , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Review Literature as Topic
16.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e6, 2020 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33317647

ABSTRACT

Patient and public involvement in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is gaining increased interest among research and policy communities. Patients' organizations represent an important link between individual patients and the health system. Social theories are increasingly being used to explain doctor-patient-system interactions, expanding understanding beyond the mere clinical perspective. In this sense, patient involvement in HTA can also be considered through the Habermas's theory of communicative action. From a Habermasian perspective, HTA as part of the instrumental rationality contributes to an increased efficiency of resource use within the system; however, such rationalization threatens to colonize the lifeworld by making it "increasingly state administered with attenuated possibilities for communicative action as a result of the commercialization and rationalization in terms of immediate returns." Using Habermasian system/lifeworld framework, this paper explores opportunities and obstacles to patient involvement in HTA, whereby trying to understand current and possible roles of patients' organizations as a mediating force between HTA as a function of the system and the lifeworld represented by patients.


Subject(s)
Patient Participation/methods , Social Theory , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Communication , Community Participation/methods , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Professional Role
17.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e3, 2020 Dec 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33267914

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This paper aims to describe the development of a flowchart to guide the decisions of researchers in the Spanish Network for Health Technology Assessment of the National Health System (RedETS) regarding patient involvement (PI) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). By doing so, it reflects on current methodological challenges in PI in the HTA field: how best to combine PI methods and what is the role of patient-based evidence. METHODS: A decisional flowchart for PI in HTA was developed between March and April 2019 following an iterative process, reviewed by the members of the PI Interest Group and other RedETS members and validated during an online deliberative meeting. The development of the flowchart was based on a previous methodological framework assessed in a pilot study. RESULTS: The guidelines on how to involve patients in HTA in the RedETS were graphically represented in a flowchart. PI must be included in all HTA reports, except those that assess technologies with no relevant impact on patients' experiences, values, and preferences. Patient organizations or expert patients related to the topic of the HTA report must be identified and invited. These patients can participate in protocol development, outcomes' identification, assessment process, and report review. When the technology assessed affects in a relevant way patient experiences, values, and preferences, patient-based evidence should be included through a systematic literature review or a primary study. CONCLUSIONS: The decisional flowchart for PI in HTA contributes to the current methodological challenges by proposing a combination of direct involvement and patient-based evidence.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Patient Participation/methods , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/legislation & jurisprudence , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Humans , Pilot Projects , Spain , State Medicine
18.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e29, 2020 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280625

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depending on the health system context and the demands of relevant stakeholders in countries, the need, organizational structure, and prerequisites for enabling capacity building and development in health technology assessment (HTA) will vary. Core competencies are instrumental in this and include essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs). They provide building blocks for delivering high-quality and effective practices of HTA. We aimed to systematically explore and develop an overview of the core competencies necessary for HTA. METHODS: This study was conducted during 2016-19 using different methods in a structured manner. We drew concepts of KSAs from various literature sources, surveyed universities and HTA professionals, and conducted expert workshops to arrive at a common understanding of the required competencies. RESULTS: The terminology for KSAs defining competencies in HTA programs has been clarified. In addition, a list of competencies offered through different educational and training programs has been created. The surveys provided clarity on a common understanding of KSAs among HTA stakeholders. Thereafter, a set of competencies was described and classified according to the HTA domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that there is diversity in HTA programs offered by educational institutions. The content of the programs varies due to differences between countries regarding the level of HTA development and the need for HTA, including the understanding of what HTA is. The preparation of a competency checklist or a "menu" of options mirroring the diversity of HTA will ensure that the specific needs of the HTA community will be covered.


Subject(s)
Capacity Building/organization & administration , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Professional Competence/standards , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Education, Graduate/organization & administration , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Stakeholder Participation
19.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e28, 2020 Nov 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33138869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The frameworks used by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies for value assessment of medicines aim to optimize healthcare resource allocation. However, they may not be effective at capturing the value of antimicrobial drugs. OBJECTIVES: To analyze stakeholder perceptions regarding how antimicrobials are assessed for value for reimbursement purposes and how the Australian HTA framework accommodates the unique attributes of antimicrobials in cost-effectiveness evaluation. METHODS: Eighteen individuals representing the pharmaceutical industry or policy-makers were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Key emergent themes were that reimbursement decision-making should consider the antibiotic spectrum when assessing value, risk of shortages, the impact of procurement processes on low-priced comparators, and the need for methodological transparency when antimicrobials are incorporated into the economic evaluation of other treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Participants agreed that the current HTA framework for antimicrobial value assessment is inadequate to properly inform funding decisions, as the contemporary definition of cost-effectiveness fails to explicitly incorporate the risk of future resistance. Policy-makers were uncertain about how to incorporate future resistance into economic evaluations without a systematic method to capture costs avoided due to good stewardship. Lacking financial reward for the benefits of narrower-spectrum antimicrobials, companies will likely focus on developing broad-spectrum agents with wider potential use. The perceived risks of shortages have influenced the funding of generic antimicrobials in Australia, with policy-makers suggesting a willingness to pay more for assured supply. Although antibiotics often underpin the effectiveness of other medicines, it is unclear how this is incorporated into economic models.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/economics , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Development/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Administrative Personnel , Anti-Infective Agents/supply & distribution , Australia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Development/economics , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/standards , Interviews as Topic , Models, Economic
20.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 37: e15, 2020 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168114

ABSTRACT

From its inception in 1999, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) committed to including the expertise, experiences, and perspectives of lay people, patients and carers, and patient organizations in its health technology assessments (HTAs). This is our story of patient involvement in HTA: from early methods designed for use when assessing medicines, widening to address the different requirements of HTAs for interventional procedures, medical technologies, and diagnostic technologies. We also chart the evolution and development of all our patient involvement methods over the past 20 years through regular evaluation and by responding to external challenge. However, we know that processes and methods alone are not enough. Through case studies we demonstrate the value of patient involvement in HTA and highlight the unique perspectives and experiences that patients bring to HTA committees. Finally, we discuss the underpinning principles and commitments that have made NICE a world leader in delivering meaningful and legitimate patient involvement.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Patient Participation/methods , State Medicine/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/organization & administration , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Ascites/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Cluster Headache/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Monitoring, Ambulatory/psychology , Suction/methods , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...