Benefit and risk evaluation of quinapril hydrochloride.

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are a mainstay of antihypertensive therapy. Quinapril hydrochloride, a less commonly used, and less-studied ACE inhibitor has been approved for its primary use in hypertension. Studies also indicate its off-label use for congestive heart failure and diabetic nephropathy. The ANDI and TREND trials have been pivotal in demonstrating the effectiveness of quinapril. AREAS COVERED: The authors conducted a review of the literature analyzing the clinical efficacy and safety profile of quinapril. This review discusses the development of quinapril, provides an updated summary of the indications and contraindications, and presents a comparison with other ACE inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: Quinapril is a safe and well-tolerated antihypertensive medication with a favorable safety profile compared to other ACE inhibitors. However, a lack of ample recent clinical trials and post-marketing data investigating the efficacy of quinapril in large cohorts has resulted in limited use in clinical practice. Quinapril may be an effective antihypertensive option for elderly populations as well as those who cannot tolerate the side effects profiles of other ACE inhibitors and as an additional treatment option for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Experience with second-line trabectedin in daily clinical practice: case studies.

As a recommended second-line option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma, trabectedin can provide the necessary balance between long-term tumor control and preserved quality of life. Three case studies illustrate the long-lasting responses that patients can achieve with second-line trabectedin. A female patient with metastatic leiomyosarcoma maintained disease control for 2 years with trabectedin (× 41 cycles) with excellent tolerability and no relevant adverse events. At the time of writing, a male patient with a metastatic solitary fibrous tumor was asymptomatic after 30 cycles of trabectedin and treatment was ongoing. A young male patient with a recurrent, nonresectable, retroperitoneal myxoid/round cell liposarcoma was able to continue his sporting activities (triathlons) over 2 years with trabectedin (× 14 cycles) plus watchful waiting.

Trabectedin as second-line treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: quality of life and safety outcomes.

The choice of second- and later-line options for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (aSTS) should always be considered from the patient's perspective, taking into account the potential impact of treatment on daily activities and quality of life. This review examines data on the safety of trabectedin in the management of patients with aSTS as reported in clinical trials and real-world studies. Evidence indicates that trabectedin exhibits an acceptable and manageable safety profile and is compatible with daily activities. Trabectedin is associated with low rates of toxicity-related discontinuations, few potentially life-threatening toxicities, a lack of apparent cumulative toxicities and low rates of grade 3/4 nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Trabectedin represents a valuable second-line option for aSTS, including in elderly patients.

Efficacy and safety of trabectedin for the treatment of advanced uterine or ovarian carcinosarcoma: Results of a phase II multicenter clinical trial (MITO-26).

OBJECTIVE: This open-label phase II clinical trial evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced ovarian (OC) or uterine carcinosarcomas (UC). METHODS: Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with histologically proven recurrent OC/UC not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy who received up to two prior chemotherapy lines. Trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every three weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v.1.1. If at least 8 of 43 patients (18.6%) achieve an objective response, trabectedin would be declared worthy for further investigations. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with either OC (n = 32) or UC (n = 13) from seven MITO centers across Italy were enrolled. The ORR was 11.9% (90% CI: 6-23) and included two patients with a complete response and three with a partial response. Eight patients (19.0%) had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 31.0% (90% CI: 20-44). Median progression-free survival was 2.01 months (95% CI: 1.78-2.30) and median overall survival was 4.64 months (95% CI: 3.19-8.29). Neutrophil count decreases (n = 8, 18.2%) and transaminase increases (n = 6, 13.6%) were the most common grade 3-5 adverse events related with trabectedin. Two patients died due to trabectedin-related grade 5 hematological toxicity. CONCLUSION: Although trabectedin did not meet the prespecified activity criteria, it confers modest but clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced OC/UC as being as effective as any other available treatment for this indication. The toxicity profile appears in line with that previously reported for the drug.

Real-World Experience of Efficacy and Safety of Trabectedin in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Bicentric Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors, with poor prognostic, judging from their frequency to relapse. Few drugs are available after the conventional first-line regimen. Since 2007, trabectedin got approval after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, for advanced or metastatic STS. This led to a FDA approval in 2015, but real-world evidence is still required, complementary to the pivotal phase II and III trials. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with STS, treated by trabectedin between 2002 and 2019, were analyzed in this retrospective study, in two French centers. The effects of trabectedin on survival, response, and toxicity were described. All patients were tested for toxicities, and efficacy was assessed in patients exposed to at least 2 cycles of trabectedin. RESULTS: Three median cycles were administered per patient (1-79). Among the 113 patients analyzed for efficacy, the median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.8), with an overall survival of 12.3 months (95% CI: 10.2-16.9). The rate of disease control was 46% at the end of treatment. Myxoid liposarcoma (n = 11) was the histology subtype that benefited most from this chemotherapy with median progression-free survival and overall survival of 13.3 months (95% CI: 2.3-18.7) and 27.8 months (95% CI: 3.2-64.7), respectively. Adverse events were manageable. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Efficacy of trabectedin is confirmed in terms of clinical benefit and low toxicity, especially for myxoid liposarcoma. Combinatory regimens are under clinical trials to optimize the place of this chemotherapy.

Trabectedin and Durvalumab Combination Is Feasible and Active in Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.

The combination of chemotherapy and immune therapies still promises to synergize for prolonged tumor control. However, the quest for optimal combinations tailored for tumor histology remains ongoing. A recent study provides evidence on the feasibility of the trabectedin/durvalumab combination and reports on interesting preliminary efficacy. See related article by Toulmonde et al., p. 1765.

Real-world experience with trabectedin for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of trabectedin/pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (trabectedin/PLD) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer have been demonstrated in randomized clinical studies. Real-world evidence is a subsequent necessary step for completing information from clinical practice. In the case of trabectedin/PLD, this evidence derives from prospective studies, retrospective analyses, and case series.Areas covered: The present narrative review provides the most relevant data about efficacy and safety of trabectedin/PLD in real-world studies, and the interpretation of the experience with trabectedin/PLD in clinical practice for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.Expert opinion: Trabectedin/PLD has a proven antitumor activity that is maintained when administered in advanced lines. Trabectedin/PLD in patients who have relapsed between 6 and 12 months have showed comparable survival outcomes than platinum-based regimens. Moreover, the administration of trabectedin/PLD was associated with a positive survival trend after two previous platinum lines and a significantly superior PFS after subsequent platinum-based therapy. Additionally, the activity of trabectedin seems to be increased in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer. Overall, real-word evidence has confirmed that trabectedin/PLD is an effective and safe non-platinum combination for advanced lines of chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

A randomized phase III trial comparing trabectedin to best supportive care in patients with pre-treated soft tissue sarcoma: T-SAR, a French Sarcoma Group trial.

BACKGROUND: The French Sarcoma Group assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of trabectedin versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study included adults with STS who progressed after 1-3 prior treatment lines. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or BSC, stratified into L-STS (liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma) and non-L-STS groups (other histotypes). Patients from the BSC arm were allowed to cross over to trabectedin at progression. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded central review and analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Between 26 January 2015 and 5 November 2015, 103 heavily pre-treated patients (60.2% with L-STS) from 16 French centers were allocated to receive trabectedin (n = 52) or BSC (n = 51). Median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.9 months] in the trabectedin arm versus 1.5 months (0.9-2.6 months) in the BSC arm (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with benefits observed across almost all analyzed subgroups, but particularly in patients with L-STS (5.1 versus 1.4 months, P = 0.0001). Seven patients (13.7%) in the trabectedin arm (all with L-STS) achieved a partial response, while no objective responses were observed in the BSC arm (P = 0.004). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44.2% of patients), leukopenia (34.6%), and transaminase increase (32.7%). Health-related 30-item core European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire evidenced no statistical differences between the arms for any domain and at any time point. After progression, 91.8% of patients crossed over from BSC to trabectedin. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control to BSC without impairing QoL in patients with recurrent STS of multiple histologies, with greater impact in patients with L-STS.

A DNA damage repair gene-associated signature predicts responses of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma to treatment with trabectedin.

Predictive biomarkers of trabectedin represent an unmet need in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, involved in homologous recombination or nucleotide excision repair, had been previously described as biomarkers of trabectedin resistance or sensitivity, respectively. The majority of these studies only focused on specific factors (ERCC1, ERCC5, and BRCA1) and did not evaluate several other DDR-related genes that could have a relevant role for trabectedin efficacy. In this retrospective translational study, 118 genes involved in DDR were evaluated to determine, by transcriptomics, a predictive gene signature of trabectedin efficacy. A six-gene predictive signature of trabectedin efficacy was built in a series of 139 tumor samples from patients with advanced STS. Patients in the high-risk gene signature group showed a significantly worse progression-free survival compared with patients in the low-risk group (2.1 vs 6.0 months, respectively). Differential gene expression analysis defined new potential predictive biomarkers of trabectedin sensitivity (PARP3 and CCNH) or resistance (DNAJB11 and PARP1). Our study identified a new gene signature that significantly predicts patients with higher probability to respond to treatment with trabectedin. Targeting some genes of this signature emerges as a potential strategy to enhance trabectedin efficacy.

Trabectedin for the therapy of ovarian cancer.

Trabectedin is a marine-derivate antitumor drug with a relevant cytotoxic activity and good safety profile. It has been investigated for the treatment of solid diseases, including ovarian cancer (OC), breast cancer, and soft-tissue sarcoma. In 2009, results from the pivotal trial OVA-301 led the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to the approval of trabectedin in combination with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent OC; further studies revealed an additional benefit also in the subgroup of patients with partially platinum-sensitive disease and in those with a BRCA-mutated status. Additionally, trabectedin demonstrated to prolong the time interval to the subsequent chemotherapy line. Recently, the improved understanding of the antitumor action exerted by trabectedin paved the way to new investigational trials exploring its combination with targeted therapies.

1-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline - The toxicological research on an exo/endogenous amine with antidepressant-like activity - In vivo, in vitro and in silico studies.

BACKGROUND: 1-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1MeTIQ) demonstrates significant neuroprotective activity. It can interact with agonistic conformation of dopamine (DA) receptors. 1MeTIQ inhibits the formation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid as well as production of free radicals and shifts DA catabolism toward COMT-dependent O-methylation. 1MeTIQ inhibits both MAO-A and B enzymes activity and increases neurotransmitters levels in the brain. It shows significant antidepressant-like effect in forced swim test (FST) in rats. This compound might be effective for depression therapy in a clinical setting but its success is determined not only by good efficacy, but also by an acceptable its ADMET profile. The use of combination in silico prediction with in vivoand in vitro studies greatly simplifies the search for new, safer and effectively acting drugs. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of histopathological changes in different rats tissues after acute and chronic administration of 1MeTIQ. Additionally, prediction of its properties in terms of absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination and toxicity in the human body was performed. RESULTS: The obtained data did not show extensive and significant toxic effects of tested substance in in vivo and in vitro studies in rats, and in silico ADMET prediction. CONCLUSIONS: These results can help to discover a new effective and safe antidepressant substance and have important significance in the treatment of depression in clinic. Additionally, the use in the treatment of depression substance with neuroprotective, antioxidant and antidepressant-like effects in the CNS and existing endogenously might be also beneficial in controlling the adverse CNS inflammatory processes accompanying depression.

Trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

PURPOSE: The OVA-YOND study is the first prospective, non-interventional trial designed to evaluate trabectedin (1.1 mg/m2) plus PLD (30 mg/m2) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), given according to the marketing authorization in real-life clinical practice across Germany. METHODS: Eligible patients were adults with platinum-sensitive ROC, pretreated with ≥ 1 platinum-containing regimen/s. The primary endpoint was to assess safety/tolerability of the combination. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with platinum-sensitive relapse from 31 sites were evaluated. Patients received a median of 6 cycles (range 1-21) with 39 patients (50.6%) receiving ≥ 6 cycles. Median treatment duration was 4.2 months (range 0.7-18.8), mostly on an outpatient basis (88.3% of patients). Most common grade 3/4 trabectedin-related adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (18.2%), neutropenia (15.6%), thrombocytopenia (9.1%), alanine (7.8%) and aspartate aminotransferase (6.5%) increase, and nausea/vomiting (5.2% each). Neutropenia (18.2%), leukopenia (15.6%), thrombocytopenia (10.4%), and nausea/vomiting (5.2% each) were the most frequent grade 3/4 PLD-related AEs. No deaths attributed to drug-related AEs or unexpected AEs occurred. Five patients (6.5%) had a complete response and 19 patients (24.7%) achieved a partial response for an objective response rate of 31.2% with median response duration of 6.25 months. Sixteen patients (20.8%) had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 51.9%. Median progression-free survival was 6.3 months and median overall survival was 16.4 months. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin plus PLD confer clinically meaningful benefit to pre-treated patients with platinum-sensitive ROC, being comparable to those previously observed in selected populations from clinical trials and with a manageable safety profile.

Body Mass Index as a Risk Factor for Toxicities in Patients with Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Treated with Trabectedin.

OBJECTIVES: Low body mass index (BMI) and/or low lean body mass have been shown to be risk factors for chemotherapy-related toxicities in a number of different cancers. However, no data are available regarding the role of BMI as a risk factor for developing toxicities related to the novel anticancer agent, trabectedin, in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). We evaluated the role of BMI as a risk factor for trabectedin-related toxicity in patients with STS. METHODS: Data from 51 patients with metastatic/advanced STS treated with trabectedin after progression on ≥1 anthracycline ± ifosfamide regimen were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35.3%) were underweight, and the remainder were of normal bodyweight (45.1%) or overweight (19.6%). Neutropenia of any grade (77.8 vs. 33.3%) and grade 3-4 neutropenia (50.0 vs. 18.2%) occurred more frequently in the underweight versus normal/overweight patients (p = 0.025). Febrile neutropenia also occurred more frequently in underweight patients. Differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for other predictors of toxicity. There were no significant differences in other hematological and nonhematological toxicities between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest for the first time that BMI should be considered a risk factor for neutropenia in patients with STS treated with trabectedin.

A noninterventional, multicenter, prospective phase IV study of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

This prospective, noninterventional study is the first phase IV trial designed to evaluate trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma in real-life clinical practice across Europe. To be included in the study, patients must have received more than or equal to one cycle of trabectedin and be currently on treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as defined by investigators. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, time to progression and the growth modulation index (GMI), overall survival, and an assessment of the cancer-related symptoms and safety. A total of 218 patients from 41 European centers were evaluated. Patients received a median of six cycles per patient, mostly on an outpatient basis (n=132; 60.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, with 70 and 49% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months after treatment, respectively. Three (1.4%) patients achieved a complete response and 55 (25.2%) patients achieved a partial response for an objective response rate of 26.6%. A total of 85 (39.0%) patients had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 65.6%. The median GMI was 0.8, with 5.1 and 38.8% of patients with a GMI of greater than 1.1 to less than 1.33 and greater than or equal to 1.33, respectively. The median overall survival was 21.3 months. Febrile neutropenia (2.3% of patients), neutropenia, nausea, and pneumonia (1.4% each) were the most common trabectedin-related grade 3/4 serious adverse drug reactions. Trabectedin confers clinically meaningful long-term benefits to patients with multiple soft tissue sarcoma histotypes, being either comparable or better than those observed previously in clinical trials, and with a manageable safety profile.

FDA Approval Summary: Trabectedin for Unresectable or Metastatic Liposarcoma or Leiomyosarcoma Following an Anthracycline-Containing Regimen.

On October 23, 2015, the FDA approved trabectedin, a new molecular entity for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma who received a prior anthracycline-containing regimen. Approval was based on results of a single, randomized, active-controlled, 518-patient, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion once every 3 weeks with dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 i.v. once every 3 weeks. Treatment with trabectedin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with a PFS of 4.2 months and 1.5 months for trabectedin and dacarbazine, respectively (HR, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.70; unstratified log-rank test, P < 0.001). The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were nausea, fatigue, vomiting, constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral edema, dyspnea, and headache. Serious adverse reactions included anaphylaxis, neutropenic sepsis, rhabdomyolysis, hepatotoxicity, cardiomyopathy, and extravasation resulting in tissue necrosis. A postmarketing trial was required to evaluate the serious risk of cardiomyopathy. This approval provides another treatment option in a setting where no drug has been shown to improve overall survival. A key regulatory consideration during review of this application was the use of PFS as an endpoint to support regular approval of trabectedin. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7448-53. ©2017 AACR.

Single agent trabectedin in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: In 2012, due to a shortage of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, single agent trabectedin was proposed as an alternative of treatment to our patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) at our center. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in this context. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who received intravenous trabectedin 1.3mg/m2 over 3h every 3weeks for ROC between January 2012 and December 2015 at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal. The primary outcome was the progression-free survival (PFS) based on CA-125 levels, clinical exam and/or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. We also evaluated overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicities. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with a median age of 59years received trabectedin in 2nd or 3rd line (12% of patients), 4th or 5th line (43%), and ≥6 lines (45%) and 45% were platinum-resistant. The median number of cycles received was 6 (range 1-19cycles). Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progression occurred in 19%, 29%, 33% and 19% of patients, respectively. The median PFS and OS was 4.3months (95% CI, 3.4-5.1) and 16.2months (95% CI, 9.0-23.5), respectively. In patients with a clinical benefit (CR, PR, SD), the median PFS was 4.6months. Trabectedin was well tolerated with few adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that trabectedin has an interesting efficacy as a single agent in heavily treated ROC patients.

Trabectedin Overrides Osteosarcoma Differentiative Block and Reprograms the Tumor Immune Environment Enabling Effective Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Purpose: Osteosarcoma, the most common primary bone tumor, is characterized by an aggressive behavior with high tendency to develop lung metastases as well as by multiple genetic aberrations that have hindered the development of targeted therapies. New therapeutic approaches are urgently needed; however, novel combinations with immunotherapies and checkpoint inhibitors require suitable preclinical models with intact immune systems to be properly tested.Experimental Design: We have developed immunocompetent osteosarcoma models that grow orthotopically in the bone and spontaneously metastasize to the lungs, mimicking human osteosarcoma. These models have been used to test the efficacy of trabectedin, a chemotherapeutic drug utilized clinically for sarcomas and ovarian cancer.Results: Trabectedin, as monotherapy, significantly inhibited osteosarcoma primary tumor growth and lung metastases by both targeting neoplastic cells and reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment. Specifically, trabectedin induced a striking differentiation of tumor cells by favoring the recruitment of Runx2, the master genetic regulator of osteoblastogenesis, on the promoter of genes involved in the physiologic process of terminal osteoblast differentiation. Differentiated neoplastic cells, as expected, showed reduced proliferation rate. Concomitantly, trabectedin enhanced the number of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes, with local CD8 T cells, however, likely post-activated or exhausted, as suggested by their high expression of the inhibitory checkpoint molecule PD-1. Accordingly, the combination with a PD-1-blocking antibody significantly increased trabectedin efficacy in controlling osteosarcoma progression.Conclusions: These results demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy of trabectedin in osteosarcoma treatment, unveiling its multiple activities and providing a solid rationale for its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(17); 5149-61. ©2017 AACR.

Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy: Subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Trabectedin demonstrated significantly improved disease control in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma patients in a global phase 3 trial (NCT01343277). A post hoc analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), the largest subgroup of enrolled patients (40%). METHODS: Of 577 patients randomized 2:1 to receive trabectedin 1.5mg/m2 by 24-hour IV infusion or dacarbazine 1g/m2 by 20-120-minute IV infusion once every three weeks, 232 had uLMS (trabectedin: 144; dacarbazine: 88). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: complete responses+partial responses+stable disease [SD] for at least 18weeks), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS: PFS for trabectedin was 4.0months compared with 1.5months for dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.81; P=0.0012). OS was similar (trabectedin 13.4months vs. dacarbazine 12.9months, HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.65-1.24; P=0.51) between groups. ORR was 11% with trabectedin vs. 9% with dacarbazine (P=0.82). CBR for trabectedin was 31% vs. 18% with dacarbazine (P=0.05); median DOR was 6.5months for trabectedin vs. 4.1months for dacarbazine (P=0.32). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events observed in ≥10% of patients in the trabectedin group included transient aminotransferase (aspartate/alanine) elevations, anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc subset analysis of patients with uLMS who had received prior anthracycline therapy, trabectedin treatment resulted in significantly longer PFS versus dacarbazine, with an acceptable safety profile. There was no difference in OS.

Real-World Management of Trabectedin/Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Trabectedin (T) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is approved for treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Despite the recommendations and guidelines, variations in managing T/PLD administration in routine clinical practice cannot be excluded. We aimed at setting up an Italian survey collecting data about management of T/PLD administration in ROC patients. METHODS: We carried out the development of a questionnaire-based survey on routine clinical practice in the management of ROC patients administered T/PLD. The survey registered the physicians' approach to modification/discontinuation of treatment, type of modifications, reasons why, and so on. The survey was transmitted to medical oncologists and gynecologic oncologists practicing in national centers/institutions. RESULTS: Fifty-eight Italian centers/institutions returned the compiled questionnaire; participants practiced at community cancer centers or hospitals (56.9%), academic institutions (36.2%), and other settings (private clinics, etc) (6.9%). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of practice setting according to geographic areas. Most responders were medical oncologists (84.5%) and were members (82.8%) of at least 1 scientific society or cooperative group. Almost 31.5% of responders reported interruption of the whole treatment, mostly because of toxicity (41.2%), followed by patients' choice (29.4%), or achievement of clinical benefit (23.5%). Dose reduction was referred by 47.4% of responders. Reduction of dose for both drugs was referred by 88.5% of responders, and the extent of dose reduction ranged between 10% and 30%. CONCLUSIONS: This survey highlights the gaps in transposing evidence-based or consensus guidelines in the real-world management of T/PLD administration; these findings could be useful in order to focus the attention on specific knowledge and/or experience gaps and plan pertinent educational programs.

Higher antitumor activity of trabectedin in germline BRCA2 carriers with advanced breast cancer as compared to BRCA1 carriers: A subset analysis of a dedicated phase II trial.

Specific alkylators may allow synthetic lethality among patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutations related cancers. The tetrahydroisoquinolone trabectedin administered at 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks showed activity in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and BRCA germline mutations, but mainly in BRCA2 carriers. Data from a phase II study were retrospectively analyzed to compare the efficacy and safety of this trabectedin dose and schedule in pretreated MBC patients bearing germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) by independent expert review. Duration of response (DR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary efficacy endpoints. Safety was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC). Data from 26 BRCA1-mutated and 13 BRCA2-mutated patients were analyzed. 69% of BRCA1-mutated cancers were triple-negative vs. 31% of BRCA2-mutated ones. 77% of BRCA1 and 31% of BRCA2 carriers were platinum-pretreated. The ORR in BRCA2-mutated patients was higher than in BRCA1-mutated patients (33.3% vs. 9.1%). DR ranged for 1.4-6.8 months in BRCA2-mutated patients and for 1.5-1.7 months in BRCA1-mutated patients. More BRCA2-mutated patients had disease stabilization for ≥4 months (25.0% vs. 9.1%) and their median PFS was longer (4.7 vs. 2.5 months). Trabectedin was well tolerated in both patient subtypes. In conclusion, trabectedin showed higher antitumor activity in relapsed MBC patients with germline BRCA2 mutations than in those with BRCA1 mutations.