In vitro evaluation of a new viscoelastometry-based point-of-care analyzer.

INTRODUCTION: The VCM is a point-of-care analyzer using a new viscoelastometry technique for rapid assessment of hemostasis on fresh whole blood. Its characteristics would make it suitable for use in austere environments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the VCM in terms of repeatability, reproducibility and interanalyzer correlation, reference values in our population, correlation with standard coagulation assays and platelet count, correlation with the TEG5000 analyzer and resistance to stress conditions mimicking an austere environment. METHODS: Repeatability, reproducibility, and interanalyzer correlation were performed on quality control samples (n = 10). Reference values were determined from blood donor samples (n = 60). Correlations with standard biological assays were assessed from ICU patients (n = 30) and blood donors (n = 60) samples. Correlation with the TEG5000 was assessed from blood donor samples. Evaluation of vibration resistance was performed on blood donor (n = 5) and quality control (n = 5) samples. RESULTS: The CVs for repeatability and reproducibility ranged from 0% to 11%. Interanalyzer correlation found correlation coefficients (r2) ranging from 0.927 to 0.997. Our reference values were consistent with those provided by the manufacturer. No robust correlation was found with conventional coagulation tests. The correlation with the TEG5000 was excellent with r2 ranging from 0.75 to 0.92. Resistance to stress conditions was excellent. CONCLUSION: The VCM analyzer is a reliable, easy-to-use instrument that correlates well with the TEG5000. Despite some logistical constraints, the results suggest that it can be used in austere environments. Further studies are required before its implementation.

Point-of-Care Viscoelastic Tests in the Management of Obstetric Hemorrhage.

Obstetric hemorrhage remains the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry are laboratory methods of assessing the kinetics of blood clot formation through real-time measurement of viscoelastic clot strength and may aid in management of severe hemorrhage. Although first described more than 70 years ago, viscoelastic testing devices are now available that allow for rapid point-of-care use of this technology to aid in real-time management of blood product replacement in cases of severe hemorrhage. These devices can be used to visually estimate multiple facets of hemostasis-coagulation, platelet function, and fibrinolysis-within 10-20 minutes. They have been used successfully in cardiac surgery, trauma, and liver transplantation and have potential for use in management of obstetric hemorrhage. Goals with their use include targeted transfusion of blood and its components for specific coagulation deficiencies. To date, however, published experiences with the use of these viscoelastic tests for obstetric hemorrhage have been limited. Because of the increasing use of the point-of-care tests by anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensivists, the purpose of this report is to familiarize obstetricians with the technology involved and its use in severe hemorrhage complicating pregnancy.

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays: Update on technology and clinical applications.

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA) are point of care tests that allow for a global assessment of coagulation using whole blood. The technology to allow this assessment has evolved from the original thromboelastography (TEG, Haemonetic, Boston, MA) to now include thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA), and, most recently, the Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer (Hemosonics, Charlottesville, VA). Diagnosis and treatment algorithms incorporating viscoelastic hemostatic tests for bleeding patients in a variety of clinical situations have now been developed. The original ROTEM and TEG technologies have been updated with emphasis placed on a cartridge-based technologies. Results from the new devices show good correlation with those from the previous versions of the devices, while cartridge-based technology has increased device stability and enhanced portability to the bedside. In this article, we will review recent advances in TEG and ROTEM technology and introduce the Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer device.

In vitro thrombogenicity testing of pulsatile mechanical circulatory support systems: Design and proof-of-concept.

Thrombogenic complications are a main issue in mechanical circulatory support (MCS). There is no validated in vitro method available to quantitatively assess the thrombogenic performance of pulsatile MCS devices under realistic hemodynamic conditions. The aim of this study is to propose a method to evaluate the thrombogenic potential of new designs without the use of complex in-vivo trials. This study presents a novel in vitro method for reproducible thrombogenicity testing of pulsatile MCS systems using low molecular weight heparinized porcine blood. Blood parameters are continuously measured with full blood thromboelastometry (ROTEM; EXTEM, FIBTEM and a custom-made analysis HEPNATEM). Thrombus formation is optically observed after four hours of testing. The results of three experiments are presented each with two parallel loops. The area of thrombus formation inside the MCS device was reproducible. The implantation of a filter inside the loop catches embolizing thrombi without a measurable increase of platelet activation, allowing conclusions of the place of origin of thrombi inside the device. EXTEM and FIBTEM parameters such as clotting velocity (α) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) show a total decrease by around 6% with a characteristic kink after 180 minutes. HEPNATEM α and MCF rise within the first 180 minutes indicate a continuously increasing activation level of coagulation. After 180 minutes, the consumption of clotting factors prevails, resulting in a decrease of α and MCF. With the designed mock loop and the presented protocol we are able to identify thrombogenic hot spots inside a pulsatile pump and characterize their thrombogenic potential.

Comparison of Viscoelastic Testing by Rotational Torsion and Harmonic Resonance Methods.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of the TEG 5000 and TEG 6S Global Hemostasis cartridge. METHODS: We reviewed validation data of the TEG 5000 and TEG 6S Global Hemostasis cartridge. The specimens were analyzed in parallel according to the manufacturer's operating instructions. RESULTS: Fifty-four healthy donors and 13 donors with known hemostatic abnormalities were included. The correlations between instrument types were only moderate-the Spearman rank correlations were 0.55, 0.62, 0.64, and 0.72, respectively, for CK R, K, angle, and maximum amplitude (MA) parameters. Using the manufacturer's device-specific reference ranges to classify results as normal/abnormal, there was weak agreement in the qualitative interpretation of all parameters (Cohen's κ for agreement for CK R, K, angle, and MA was 0.418, 0.154, -0.083, and 0.127, respectively). This could lead to discordant transfusion decisions. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the TEG 5000 and TEG 6S may not be used interchangeably.

Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitor as a Novel Device to Assess Coagulation at the Bedside. A Single-Center Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM) is a portable device developed to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of whole blood activated by contact with glass. In this study, VCM was employed to analyze the viscoelastic profiles of 36 COVID-19 intensive care patients. Full anticoagulant dose heparin (unfractionated [UFH]; low molecular weight [LMWH]) was administrated to all patients. The association between VCM and laboratory parameters was retrospectively analyzed. The administration of UFH-influenced VCM parameters prolonging clotting time (CT) and clot formation time (CFT) and reducing angle (alpha) and amplitudes of the VCM tracings (A10, A20, and maximum clot firmness [MCF]) compared with LMWH therapy. A tendency toward hypercoagulation was observed by short CT and CFT in patients receiving LMWH. Clotting time was correlated with UFH dose (Spearman's rho = 0.48, p ≤ 0.001), and no correlation was found between CT and LMWH. All VCM tracings failed to show lysis at 30 and 45 minutes, indicating the absence of fibrinolysis. A10, A20, and MCF exhibited very-good to good diagnostic accuracy for detecting platelet count and fibrinogen above the upper reference limit of the laboratory. In conclusion, VCM provided reliable results in COVID-19 patients and was easy to perform with minimal training at the bedside.

Implementing thrombelastography: Experiences from a level I trauma institution.

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays such as thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thrombelastometry have proven to be important point-of-care tools in the management of acute traumatic hemorrhage. Despite the availability of prospective studies that have confirmed the utility of TEG in reducing transfusion requirements and mortality in bleeding patients when compared to conventional coagulation tests, many institutions run into barriers implementing these viscoelastic hemostatic assays due to concerns regarding cost and benefit. At our academic Level 1 trauma institution, the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery advocated for the addition of TEG to the clinical armamentarium of providers caring for injured patients and thus spearheaded the clinical implementation of TEG. With the approval of the central laboratory, the Division developed an extensive and well-trained team to run and interpret TEGs as well as perform machine validation and upkeep. The Division continues to perform point-of-care testing throughout the hospital today.

The strengths and weaknesses of viscoelastic testing compared to traditional coagulation testing.

Optimized acute bleeding management requires timely and reliable laboratory testing to detect and diagnose coagulopathies and guide transfusion therapy. Conventional coagulation tests (CCT) are inexpensive with minimal labor requirements, but CCTs may have delayed turnaround times. In addition, abnormal CCT values may not reflect in vivo coagulopathies that require treatment and may lead to overtransfusion. The use of viscoelastic testing (VET) has been rapidly expanding and is recommended by several recent bleeding guidelines. This review is intended to compare CCT to VET, review the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, and evaluate and summarize the clinical studies that compared CCT-based and VET-based transfusion algorithms. Most studies of CCT vs VET transfusion algorithms favor the use of VET in the management of massively bleeding patients due to reductions in blood product utilization, bleeding, costs, and lengths of stay.

Viscoelastic testing in liver transplantation.

Despite the lack of large randomized clinical studies, viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been a critical armamentarium for hemostatic control in liver transplantation (LT) since the 1960s. Many transplant institutions have adopted VETs in their clinical practice. Several small-size randomized clinical trials on LT patients have suggested that VET-guided hemostatic treatment algorithms have led to decreased indications for and amounts of transfused blood products, especially fresh-frozen plasma, compared to standard laboratory-based hemostatic management. VETs have also been reported to offer insight into the diagnosis and prediction of LT patients' development of hypercoagulability-related morbidity and mortality. There is still a need for VET device-specific hemostatic algorithms in LT, and clinicians must take into account the tendency to underestimate the coagulation capacity of VETs in patients with end-stage liver disease where hemostasis is rebalanced.

Basic principles of viscoelastic testing.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic testing is a method of hemostatic analysis that provides a real-time, holistic view of ex vivo clotting. It allows for examination of both cellular and plasma protein contributions to clotting including platelet number and function, fibrin(ogen) function, and coagulation factor function. The method assesses physical clot properties during the transition of blood from a liquid to a gel state, either by measurement of clot shear modulus using physical force transduction or by measurement of clot resonance frequency using sonometric interrogation. Results are reported in a live trace, with different trace parameters reflecting different contributors to hemostasis. These reported parameters vary between testing platforms. RESULTS: In the United States, there are several commonly used Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved viscoelastic instruments available on the market. Those instruments that use sonometric clot assessment are more recently available and allow for improved portability for use near the patient's bedside. These instruments generally feature different reagent kits that allow more specific interrogation of different hemostatic pathways. Viscoelastic testing can predict the results of traditional plasma-based coagulation assays and has the added benefit of detecting hypercoagulability and severe hyperfibrinolysis. Implementation of viscoelastic testing in many clinical settings is becoming widespread and has proven to be efficacious in reducing blood transfusion rates in many settings. An impact on overall mortality and morbidity has not yet been demonstrated. CONCLUSION: This article provides a narrative review of the basic principles of viscoelastic testing, including the science and technology behind the method, as well as currently available testing platforms and reagents.

Viscoelastic testing in pediatric patients.

A tailored transfusion algorithm based on viscoelastic testing in the perioperative period or in trauma patients is recommended by guidelines for bleeding management. Bleeding management strategies in neonates and children are mostly extrapolated from the adult experience, as published evidence in the youngest age group is scarce. This manuscript is intended to give a structured overview of what has been published on the use of viscoelastic testing to guide bleeding management in neonates and children. Several devices that use either the traditional viscoelastic method or resonance viscoelastography technology are on the market. Reference ranges for children have been evaluated in only some of them. As most of the hemostasis maturation processes can be observed during the first year of life, adult reference ranges for viscoelastic testing could be applied over the age of 1 year. The majority of the published trials in children are based on retrospective analyses describing the correlation between viscoelastic testing and standard laboratory testing or focusing on the prediction of bleeding. Clinically more relevant studies in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery have demonstrated that the implementation of a transfusion algorithm based on viscoelastic testing has significantly reduced transfusion requirements and that this approach has enabled a rapid detection of coagulation disorders in the presence of excessive bleeding. Although further studies are urgently needed, experts have reviewed the use of a transfusion algorithm based on viscoelastic testing in children as a feasible approach, as it has been shown to improve bleeding management and rationalize blood product transfusion.

Viscoelastic testing in benign hematologic disorders: Clinical perspectives and future implications of point-of-care testing to assess hemostatic competence.

Viscoelastic tests (VETs) have been used routinely for liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, and trauma, but only recently have found clinical utility in benign hematologic disorders. Therefore, guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these disorders based on viscoelastic variables have been adapted from the existing transplant, cardiothoracic surgery, and trauma resuscitation literature. As a result, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for benign hematologic disorders utilizing VETs are not uniform. Accordingly, even though there has been a recent increase in the utilization of VET for the diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, the literature is still in its early stages. Analysis of point-of-care viscoelastic tracings from benign hematologic disorders has the potential to allow prompt recognition of disease and to guide patient-specific intervention. Here we present a review describing the application of VETs to benign hematologic disorders.

Viscoelastic testing in oncology patients (including for the diagnosis of fibrinolysis): Review of existing evidence, technology comparison, and clinical utility.

The quantification of the coagulopathic state associated with oncologic and hematologic diseases is imperfectly assessed by common coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen levels, and platelet count. These tests provide a static representation of a component of hemostatic integrity, presenting an incomplete picture of coagulation in these patients. Viscoelastic tests (VETs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG), as whole blood analyses, provide data related to the cumulative effects of blood components and all stages of the coagulation and fibrinolytic processes. The utility of VETs has been demonstrated since the late 1960s in guiding blood component therapy for patients undergoing liver transplantation. Since then, the scope of viscoelastic testing has expanded to become routinely used for cardiac surgery, obstetrics, and trauma. In the past decade, VETs' expanded usage has been most significant in trauma resuscitation. However, use of VETs for patients with malignancy-associated coagulopathy (MAC) and hematologic malignancies is increasing. For the purposes of this narrative review, we discuss the similarities between trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) and MAC. These similarities center on the thrombomodulin-thrombin complex as it switches between the thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor coagulation pathway and activating the protein C anticoagulation pathway. This produces a spectrum of coagulopathy and fibrinolytic alterations ranging from shutdown to hyperfibrinolysis that are common to TIC, MAC, and hematologic malignancies. There is expanding literature regarding the utility of TEG and ROTEM to describe the hemostatic integrity of patients with oncologic and hematologic conditions, which we review here.

The role of viscoelastic testing in the management of the parturient.

Viscoelastic testing is the measurement of how the viscoelastic properties of blood change as blood clots. In pregnancy, unique changes in clotting function occur overall to make the pregnant woman hypercoagulable. Viscoelastic testing may be able to play a role in guiding placement of epidural and spinal anesthetics by demonstrating enhanced coagulation function, even when there are individual parts of the coagulation system that are abnormal, for example, thrombocytopenia. These tools may also play a role in addressing the management of maternal hemorrhage, which in the United States is on the rise. This review discusses the opportunity to use viscoelastic testing in the parturient.

TEG PlateletMapping assay results may be misleading in the presence of cold stored platelets.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests (VETs) are used widely to monitor hemostasis in settings such as cardiac surgery. There has also been renewed interest in cold stored platelets (CSPs) to manage bleeding in this setting. CSPs are reported to have altered hemostatic properties compared to room temperature platelets (RTPs), including activation of GPIIb/IIIa. We investigated whether the functional differences between CSP and RTP affected the performance of the PlateletMapping VET on the TEG 5000 and 6s analyzer. METHOD: Platelet concentrates were divided equally into CSP (stored at 4°C ± 2°C) and RTP (stored at 22°C ± 2°C) fractions. Whole blood was treated to induce platelet dysfunction (WBIPD) by incubating with anti-platelet drugs (1.0 µM ticagrelor and 10 µM aspirin) or by simulating cardiopulmonary bypass. WBIPD samples were then mixed with 20% by volume of CSPs or RTPs to model platelet transfusion before analysis using the PlateletMapping VET. RESULTS: Addition of CSPs to WBIPD increased the PlateletMapping MAFIBRIN and MAADP parameters with the TEG 5000 analyzer (both p < 0.0001 compared to addition of buffer alone). This effect was not observed with RTPs. The differential effect of CSPs on the MAFIBRIN corrected after pre-incubation with the GPIIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban and was quantitatively less with the PlateletMapping test for the TEG 6s analyzer which contains the GPIIb/IIa antagonist abciximab. DISCUSSION: The PlateletMapping MAFIBRIN and MAADP test results may be misleadingly high with CSPs, particularly with the TEG 5000 analyzer, most likely due to constitutive activation of GPIIb/IIIa on CSPs during storage. TEG PlateletMapping results should be interpreted with caution following CSP transfusion.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Quantra QPlus System in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Surgical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The management of perioperative bleeding and the optimization of the available therapies are subjects of significant clinical interest. Clinical guidelines recommend the use of whole blood viscoelastic testing devices to target the utilization of blood products during major surgical procedures. The Quantra QPlus System is a new cartridge-based viscoelastic testing device based on an innovative ultrasound technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate this new system in a surgical population. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven adult subjects were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective observational study consisting primarily of patients undergoing cardiac and major orthopedic surgeries. Samples were obtained at multiple time points for testing on the Quantra QPlus System, the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) delta, and standard coagulation tests. Quantra measurements included Clot Time (CT), Heparinase Clot Time (CTH), Clot Time Ratio (CTR), Clot Stiffness (CS), Fibrinogen (FCS), and Platelet (PCS) Contributions to CS. Data analyses included assessment of the concordance of Quantra parameters with a series of clinical composite indexes formed on the basis of standard coagulation tests in 3 domains representing increased, decreased, and normal/subclinical coagulation function. Linear regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses of Quantra parameters with corresponding parameters from ROTEM assays were also performed. RESULTS: The accuracy (overall percent agreement or ratio of true positives and true negatives over the entire population) between the Quantra and the composite indexes was between 72% and 98% depending on the specific parameter. Linear regression analysis indicated that the correlation between ROTEM delta and Quantra was very strong with r values ranging between 0.84 and 0.89. Results from ROC analysis demonstrated sensitivities and specificities in the 80%-90% range when QPlus parameters were used to discriminate ROTEM threshold values currently used in goal-directed treatment algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the Quantra QPlus System is strongly correlated with a well-established viscoelastic testing device and its parameters effectively represent the results from multiple standard laboratory assays. The Quantra has been designed to operate at the point of care with the potential to provide rapid and comprehensive results to aid in the management of coagulopathic patients.

Accelerating availability of clinically-relevant parameter estimates from thromboelastogram point-of-care device.

BACKGROUND: Modeling approaches offer a novel way to detect and predict coagulopathy in trauma patients. A dynamic model, built and tested on thromboelastogram (TEG) data, was used to generate a virtual library of over 160,000 simulated RapidTEGs. The patient-specific parameters are the initial platelet count, platelet activation rate, thrombus growth rate, and lysis rate (P(0), k1, k2, and k3, respectively). METHODS: Patient data from both STAAMP (n = 182 patients) and PAMPer (n = 111 patients) clinical trials were collected. A total of 873 RapidTEGs were analyzed. One hundred sixteen TEGs indicated maximum amplitude (MA) below normal and 466 TEGs indicated lysis percent above normal. Each patient's TEG response was compared against the virtual library of TEGs to determine library trajectories having the least sum-of-squared error versus the patient TEG up to each specified evaluation time ∈ (3, 4, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20 minutes). Using 10 nearest-neighbor trajectories, a logistic regression was performed to predict if the patient TEG indicated MA below normal (<50 mm), lysis percent 30 minutes after MA (LY30) greater than 3%, and/or blood transfusion need using the parameters from the dynamic model. RESULTS: The algorithm predicts abnormal MA values using the initial 3 minutes of RapidTEG data with a median area under the curve of 0.95, and improves with more data to 0.98 by 10 minutes. Prediction of future platelet and packed red blood cell transfusion based on parameters at 4 and 5 minutes, respectively, provides equivalent predictions to the traditional TEG parameters in significantly less time. Dynamic model parameters could not predict abnormal LY30 or future fresh-frozen plasma transfusion. CONCLUSION: This analysis could be incorporated into TEG software and workflow to quickly estimate if the MA would be below or above threshold value within the initial minutes following a TEG, along with an estimate of what blood products to have on hand. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management: Level IV.

A comparison between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 analyzers to assess coagulation in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy is a major driver of mortality following severe injury. Viscoelastic goal-directed resuscitation can reduce mortality after injury. The TEG 5000 system is widely used for viscoelastic testing. However, the TEG 6s system incorporates newer technology, with encouraging results in cardiovascular interventions. The purpose of this study was to validate the TEG 6s system for use in trauma patients. METHODS: Multicenter noninvasive observational study for method comparison conducted at 12 US Levels I and II trauma centers. Agreement between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 systems was examined using citrated kaolin reaction time (CK.R), citrated functional fibrinogen maximum amplitude (CFF.MA), citrated kaolin percent clot lysis at 30 minutes (CK.LY30), citrated RapidTEG maximum amplitude (CRT.MA), and citrated kaolin maximum amplitude (CK.MA) parameters in adults meeting full or limited trauma team criteria. Blood was drawn ≤1 hour after admission. Assays were repeated in duplicate. Reliability (TEG 5000 vs. TEG 6s analyzers) and repeatability (interdevice comparison) was quantified. Linear regression was used to define the relationship between TEG 6s and TEG 5000 devices. RESULTS: A total of 475 patients were enrolled. The cohort was predominantly male (68.6%) with a median age of 49 years. Regression line slope estimates (ß) and linear correlation estimates (p) were as follows: CK.R (ß = 1.05, ρ = 0.9), CFF.MA (ß = 0.99, ρ = 0.95), CK.LY30 (ß = 1.01, ρ = 0.91), CRT.MA (TEG 6s) versus CK.MA (TEG 5000) (ß = 1.06, ρ = 0.86) as well as versus CRT.MA (TEG 5000) (ß = 0.93, ρ = 0.93), indicating strong reliability between the devices. Overall, within-device repeatability was better for TEG 6s versus TEG 5000, particularly for CFF.MA and CK.LY30. CONCLUSION: The TEG 6s device appears to be highly reliable for use in trauma patients, with close correlation to the TEG 5000 device and equivalent/improved within-device reliability. Given the potential advantages of using the TEG 6s device at the site of care, confirmation of agreement between the devices represents an important advance in diagnostic testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level II.

A prospective study on the correlation between thromboelastometry and standard laboratory tests - influence of type of surgery and perioperative sampling times.

This prospective study aimed at investigating the influence of surgery type and perioperative sampling times on the correlations between rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and standard laboratory coagulation tests assessing comparable coagulation phases. Patients undergoing glioblastoma multiforme resection (GBR group, n = 60) or laparoscopic colon cancer resection (CCR group, n = 40) were prospectively included. Blood samples for ROTEM and laboratory assessments were consecutively drawn within 24-hours prior to surgery (baseline), and at 2, 24 and 48-hours after surgery. Correlations between perioperative ExTEM clotting-time (CT-exTEM) and prothrombin time (PT), and between FibTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF-fibTEM) with and plasma fibrinogen (pFB) concentration (Clauss method), were evaluated using the Spearman's rho test. The efficiency of recommended cut-offs of CT-exTEM (>75 s) and MCF-fibTEM (<10 mm) for predicting a prolonged PT (>15 s) or a low pFB (<2 g/L), respectively, was assessed using Receiver-Operator Characteristic curves. Correlations between CT-exTEM and PT were weak in GBR (rho = 0.25 [0.12-0.38], p < .01), and very weak in CCR (rho = 0.06 [-0.12-0.27]). Those between MCF-fibTEM and pFB, were strong in both GBR (rho = 0.69 [0.61-0.76], p < .01) and CCR (rho = 0.70 [0.60-0.78], p < .01). These correlations remained largely unchanged over the studied perioperative period in both groups. Recommended CT-exTEM and MCF-fibTEM cut-offs had poor sensitivity for predicting a prolonged PT (17% [8-31]) or a low pFB (46% [32-62]), without group-related differences. Neither the type of surgery nor the perioperative sampling times had a significant influence on the correlations between ROTEM parameters and standard laboratory tests. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02652897.