Non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

BACKGROUND: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling movement disorder associated with the prolonged use of antipsychotic medication. Several strategies have been examined in the treatment of TD. Currently, however, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs in TD and they have been associated with many side effects. One particular strategy would be to use pharmaceutical agents which are known to influence the catecholaminergic system at various junctures. OBJECTIVES: 1. To determine the effects of any of the following drugs for antipsychotic-induced TD in people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses.i. Drugs which influence the noradrenergic system.ii. Dopamine receptor agonists.iii. Dopamine receptor antagonists.iv. Dopamine-depletor drugs.v. Drugs that increase the production or release of dopamine.2. To examine whether any improvement occurred with short periods of intervention (less than 6 weeks) and, if this did occur, whether this effect was maintained at longer periods of follow-up.3. To examine if there was a differential effect for the various compounds.4. To examine whether the use of non-antipsychotic catecholaminergic drugs are most effective in those with more recent onset TD (less than five years). SEARCH METHODS: We retrieved 712 references from searching the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (July 2015 and April 2017). We also inspected references of all identified studies for further trials and contacted authors of trials for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected studies if they were randomised controlled trials focusing on people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses and antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. We compared the use of catecholaminergic interventions versus placebo, no intervention, or any other intervention for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data from these trials and we estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assumed that people who left the studies early had no improvement. MAIN RESULTS: There are 10 included trials (N = 261) published between 1973 and 2010; eight are new from the 2015 and 2017 update searches. Forty-eight studies are excluded. Participants were mostly chronically mentally ill inpatients in their 50s, and studies were primarily of short (2 to 6 weeks) duration. The overall risk of bias in these studies was unclear, mainly due to poor reporting of allocation concealment and generation of the sequence. Studies were also not clearly blinded and we are unsure if data are incomplete or selectively reported, or if other biases were operating.One small, three-arm trial found that both alpha-methyldopa (N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80; low-quality evidence) and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.52 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; low-quality evidence) may lead to a clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms compared with placebo after 2 weeks' treatment, but found no evidence of a difference between alpha-methyldopa and reserpine (N = 20; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.86; very low quality evidence). Another small trial compared tetrabenazine and haloperidol after 18 weeks' treatment and found no evidence of a difference on clinically important improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms (N = 13; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.95; very low quality evidence). No study reported on adverse events.For remaining outcomes there was no evidence of a difference between any of the interventions: alpha-methyldopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.02 to 7.32; very low quality evidence), celiprolol versus placebo for leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 5.28, 95% CI 0.27 to 102.58; very low quality evidence) and quality of life (1 RCT; N = 35; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.12; very low quality evidence), alpha-methyldopa versus reserpine for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 20; not estimable, no reported events; very low quality evidence), reserpine or carbidopa/levodopa versus placebo for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (2 RCTs; N = 37; RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.99; very low quality evidence), oxypertine versus placebo for deterioration of mental state (1 RCT; N = 42; RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.22 to 22.45; very low quality evidence), dopaminergic drugs (amantadine, bromocriptine, tiapride, oxypertine, carbidopa/levodopa) versus placebo for leaving the study early (6 RCTs; N = 163; RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.54; very low quality evidence), and tetrabenazine versus haloperidol for deterioration of tardive dyskinesia symptoms (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.09 to 14.92) and leaving the study early (1 RCT; N = 13; RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.00). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a large amount of research in this area, many studies were excluded due to inherent problems in the nature of their cross-over designs. Usually data are not reported before the cross-over and the nature of TD and its likely response to treatments make it imprudent to use this data. The review provides little usable information for service users or providers and more well-designed and well-reported studies are indicated.

[A multicenter controlled study on aripiprazole treatment for children with Tourette syndrome in China].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of children with Tourette syndrome. METHOD: A prospective, multi-center, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 195 children aged 5-17 years with Tourette syndrome. The patients were assigned to two groups: aripiprazole group (n=98) and tiapride group (n=97), with the treatment dosage of 5-25 mg/d and 100-500 mg/d, respectively. After 12 weeks treatment, the clinical efficacy was assessed by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) score, and adverse reactions were observed by side effects symptoms scale, blood biochemical indexes, and electrocardiography. RESULT: Significant pre- and post-treatment differences were ascertained for motor tic, phonic tic, function damage and total scores of YGTSS in the both groups from the second week of treatment (P<0.0001). Compared with the tiapride group, the aripiprazole group showed a more significantly decreased function damage score of YGTSS by the second week of treatment (P<0.05). After 12 weeks treatment, total scores of YGTSS in the aripiprazole group decreased from 53.74±15.71 at baseline to 24.36±16.38, while in the tiapride group from 51.66±13.63 to 23.26±15.31. The mean reduction scores of YGTSS were 29.38 in the aripiprazole group and 28.40 in the tiapride group at the end of treatment, and the clinical response rates were 60.21% and 63.92%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was similar in the aripiprazole and tiapride groups, with 29.6% and 27.8% respectively. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between aripiprazole and tiapride groups and no severe adverse events were found in either group. CONCLUSION: The results showed that aripiprazole showed similar therapeutic effect to tiapride in treatment of children with Tourette syndrome. Aripiprazole was safe and well tolerated in Chinese population, and can be considered as a new valid option for the treatment of tic disorders.

A combination of levetiracetam and tiapride for outpatient alcohol detoxification: a case series.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal pharmacotherapy of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in outpatient settings is still a matter of discussion. The aim of this evaluation was to examine the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of levetiracetam and tiapride for outpatient alcohol detoxification. METHODS: This was an open-label evaluation. After screening eligibility for outpatient detoxification, 9 alcohol-dependent patients received levetiracetam and tiapride in a flexible dosage regimen up to 2500 and 300 mg/d, respectively, for a maximum of 7 days. Severity of alcohol withdrawal was assessed daily using the Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome Scale (AWSS). RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment successfully. The mean initial doses of levetiracetam and tiapride were 2166.7 and 300 mg/d, respectively. AWS as indicated by the AWSS score decreased clearly over 5 days. The combination of levetiracetam and tiapride was well tolerated. Neither treatment discontinuations because of side effects of the medication nor serious medical complications were observed during the detoxification. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evaluation provide first evidence that the combination of levetiracetam and tiapride might be an effective and safe treatment option for mild to moderate AWS in outpatient settings. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary results.

[A control study of aripiprazole and tiapride treatment for tic disorders in children].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of tic disorder when tiapride is used as a control. METHODS: Sixty-five children aged 6-14 years old with tic disorders were randomly assigned to two groups: aripiprazole (2.5-10 mg/d) and tiapride treatment (25- 400 mg/d). After 12 weeks treatment, the clinical efficacy was assessed by the Yale Global Tie Severity Scale (YGTSS) score and the adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: The YGTSS score in both groups decreased from the second week of treatment. Compared with the tiapride treatment group, the aripirazole treatment group showed a more decreased YGTSS score (29+/-13)% vs (16+/-14)%; P<0.01 by the second week of treatment. The overall effective rate in the aripiprazole and tiapride treatment groups was 91% and 84%, respectively (P>0.05) 12 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the aripiprazole and tiapride treatment groups and no severe adverse events were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose aripiprazole is safe and effective for treatment of tic disorders in children, suggesting that it represents a new valid option for the treatment of tic disorder.

Pregabalin, tiapride and lorazepam in alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a multi-centre, randomized, single-blind comparison trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this trial was to compare lorazepam with non-benzodiazepine medications such as pregabalin and tiapride in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). These drugs were chosen for their inhibitorial effects on the hypersecretion of neurotransmitters usually observed in AWS. Craving reduction and improvement of psychiatric symptoms were the secondary end-points. METHODS: One hundred and ninety subjects affected by current alcohol dependence were considered consecutively: 111 were enrolled and divided into three groups of 37 subjects each. Within a treatment duration of 14 days, medication was given up to the following maximum doses (pregabalin 450 mg/day; tiapride 800 mg/day; lorazepam 10 mg/day). Withdrawal (CIWA-Ar), craving [visual analogue scale (VAS); Obsessive and Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS)], psychiatric symptoms [Symptom Check List 90 Revised (SCL-90-R)] and quality of life (QL-index) rating scales were applied. RESULTS: On the CIWA-Ar score, all the groups showed a significant reduction between times (P < 0.001) with a higher reduction for the pregabalin group (P < 0.01) on items regarding headache and orientation. Retention in treatment was lower in the tiapride group (P < 0.05), while the number of subjects remaining alcohol free was higher in the pregabalin group (P < 0.05). Significant reduction between baseline and the end of the treatment was found in all the groups at the OCDS and the VAS for craving, at the SCL-90-R and QL-index (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: All the medications in the trial showed evidence of safety and efficacy in the treatment of uncomplicated forms of AWS, with some particular differences. The efficacy of pregabalin was superior to that of tiapride, used largely in research trials and, for some measures, to that of the 'gold standard', lorazepam. Accordingly, pregabalin may be considered as a potentially useful new drug for treatment of AWS, deserving further investigation.

Oxcarbazepine in combination with Tiaprid in inpatient alcohol-withdrawal--a RCT.

INTRODUCTION: Oxcarbazepine (OXC), a derivative of Carbamazepine (CBZ), may represent a solution to metabolic and side effects of CBZ treatment due to the fact that renal excretion is its major route of elimination. The goal of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of OXC/Tiaprid (TIA) combination therapy to the well established Clomethiazole (CLO) therapy in an inpatient setting. METHODS: To investigate the efficacy of OXC/TIA in terms of lower alcohol withdrawal symptoms and better tolerability, 56 alcohol-dependent patients participated in a randomized open-label trial, where OXC/TIA and CLO treatments were compared. RESULTS: Following admission, we observed that severity of alcohol withdrawal syndrome was comparable between OXC/TIA and CLO-patients. Overall tolerability was good. However, significantly more patients in the OXC/TIA-group (48.1%) displayed no AE compared to the CLO-group (24.1%). We found no significant differences between groups regarding total number of recorded adverse events (AEs). DISCUSSION: OXC/TIA inpatient therapy proved to be as effective and participants demonstrated the same tolerance as with CLO. In medication-based alcohol withdrawal, OXC/TIA could have the potential to become a promising alternative for alcohol dependent patients unable to undergo inpatient withdrawal therapy with CLO. Our findings further indicate that it could be worthwhile testing OXC/TIA in alcohol withdrawal in daily care units and outpatient settings. This is an important question for national health care services, since outpatient therapy is more and more asked for as alternative to inpatient settings.

[Tiapride with the horn of saiga tatarica in the treatment of hemifacial spasm].

OBJECTIVE: Tiapride has been used effectively in the clinic for the treatment of dyskinesias and tic disorders including Tourette syndrome. The purpose of the retrospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness of tiapride with the horn of saiga tatarica in treatment of hemifacial spasm. METHOD: Twenty-eight patients with idiopathic hemifacial spasm, who were previously treated with carbamazepine, or acupuncture, or botulinum toxin injection, but refused to continue the previous therapies, were treated with tiapride, at a dosage of 50 mg/time once to thrice per day, combined with the horn of saiga tatarica at a dosage of 0.15 g to 0.30 g/time once per day. The dosage of tiapride can been up to 100 mg/time once to thrice per day in some cases if necessary. The effectiveness of the therapy was evaluated from the time of three months after the beginning of the treatment. The main efficacy parameter was the degree of spasm reduction, that is, the classification of spasm before versus after the treatment. RESULT: The duration of following up is between 3 months and 12 months. Twenty-five cases out of 28 patients have demonstrated a significant reduction of spasm. Of which, eight cases were completely relieved, 12 cases marked relieved and 5 cases partially relieved. The effective rate is 89.29%. CONCLUSION: Tiapride combined with the horn of saiga tatarica was effective and safe in reducing hemifacial spasm. However, further data from blinded trials and long-term following up are required before this treatment can be considered to be one of the main medical treatment options for hemifacial spasm.

The efficacy of the dopamine D2/D3 antagonist tiapride in maintaining abstinence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 299 alcohol-dependent patients.

In this investigation, the hypothesis was tested whether the selective dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist tiapride is effective in maintaining abstinence after detoxification in alcohol-dependent patients. The rationale of the study was based on the relevance of the dopaminergic system for addictive behaviour as well as some preliminary studies. A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted. A total of 299 detoxified alcohol-dependent patients (ICD-10: F10.2) received either tiapride (300 mg/d) or placebo over a 24-wk study period. Subjects with severe comorbid psychiatric disorder such as schizophrenia or Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome were excluded. Primary outcome variable was the time to first relapse with relapse defined as any alcohol consumption after detoxification. Data analysis was done with Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank test (one-sided, p<0.05). Tiapride was not superior to placebo in maintaining abstinence. The time to first relapse was 71 d in the tiapride group and 92 d in the placebo group (log-rank test, p=0.9895). Relapse rate was higher in the intervention group (54.4%) than in the control group (40.7%). Like the dopamine antagonist flupenthixol, tiapride was not effective in maintaining alcohol abstinence. Regarding the high success rate in the placebo group the influence of psychosocial treatment in studies investigating drug effects on the course of alcohol dependence has to be considered.

Comparison of two pre-exposure treatment regimens in acute organophosphate (paraoxon) poisoning in rats: tiapride vs. pyridostigmine.

Recently, the FDA approved the medical use of oral pyridostigmine as prophylactic treatment of possible nerve agent exposure: the concept is to block the cholinesterase transitorily using the carbamate (pyridostigmine) in order to deny access to the active site of the enzyme to the irreversible inhibitor (nerve agent) on subsequent exposure. We have shown previously that tiapride is in vitro a weak inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and that in rats administration of tiapride before the organophosphate paraoxon significantly decreases mortality. The purpose of the present study was to compare tiapride- and pyridostigmine-based pretreatment strategies, either alone or in combination with pralidoxime reactivation, by using a prospective, non-blinded study in a rat model of acute high-dose paraoxon exposure. Groups 1-6 received 1 microMol paraoxon (approximately LD75) groups 2-6 received in addition: G(2)50 microMol tiapride 30 min before paraoxonG(3)50 microMol tiapride 30 min before paraoxon and 50 microMol pralidoxime 1 min after paraoxon G41 microMol pyridostigmine 30 min before paraoxon G(5)1 microMol pyridostigmine 30 min before paraoxon and 50 microMol pralidoxime 1 min after paraoxon G(6)50 microMol pralidoxime 1 min after paraoxon. Mortality data were compared using Kaplan-Meier plots and logrank tests. Mortality is statistically significantly influenced by all treatment strategies. Tiapride pretreatment followed by pralidoxime treatment (G3) is aux par with pyridostigmine pretreatment followed by pralidoxime treatment (G5). Tiapride pretreatment only (G2) is inferior to pyridostigmine pretreatment only (G4). The best results are achieved with pyridostigmine pretreatment only or pralidoxime treatment only (G4 and G6).

[Facial chorea and hemichorea due to cardiogenic cerebral embolism in the cortex and subcortical white matter].

A 62-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of suddenly developed bilateral facial chorea and left-sided hemichorea. He had neither hemiparesis nor sensory disturbance. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images of the brain showed acute cortical and subcortical infarctions at the right insula, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes. Tiapride hydrochloride was administered for his chorea. The chorea disappeared on the next day. We diagnosed him as cardiogenic cerebral embolism because he had a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We supposed that his chorea was induced by interruption of excitatory output from cerebral cortex to striatum and subthalamic nucleus. Contralateral cortical and subcortical infarction must be considered when a patient suddenly develops hemichorea.

Treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome with a combination of tiapride/carbamazepine: results of a pooled analysis in 540 patients.

This was a retrospective study to examine the efficacy, practicability and medical safety of a combination of tiapride and unretarded (fast acting formula) carbamazepine in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. In five hospitals using this combination for treatment of alcohol withdrawal, 540 patients who had been treated with this combination were identified. An intensive evaluation of patients files and charts was performed. Details of alcohol history and comorbid disorders were extracted from patient files. Severity of alcohol withdrawal had been assessed using the CIWA-A-Score. Gender differences and differences between patients in their first and at least second withdrawal were computed by means of variance analyses (GLM). At baseline (day 1) mean dosage given was 796 for tiapride and 543 mg for carbamazepine. A pooled analysis of the results showed that, in general, medication was well tolerated. Withdrawal symptomatology as indicated by CIWA-A scores clearly decreased over time. Although a significant number of patients had a history of alcohol withdrawal delirium (103) and epileptic seizures (151), few patients suffered from them during treatment (8 and 5, respectively). Only 24 (4.4%) patients dropped out because of lack of efficacy or change of medication, 15 (2.8%) because of side effects. No case of malignant neuroleptic syndrome was recorded. Data analysis showed gender differences and differences between patients in their first and at least second withdrawal for side effects, complications, and in some CIWA-A-scores. In general, severe complications of withdrawal syndrome were more frequent in men compared to women and in patients with repeated inpatient treatment. In line with previous research, the results from this study give further evidence that a combination of the anticonvulsant carbamazepine and tiapride is an effective and safe treatment for alcohol withdrawal treatment.

Efficacy and safety of outpatient alcohol detoxification with a combination of tiapride/carbamazepine: additional evidence.

BACKGROUND: Few medications have been tested for outpatient alcohol detoxification. Previously we had shown a combination of carbamazepine and tiapride to be effective in an open study. This database is an extension of our previous work. METHODS: This was an open prospective study to examine the efficacy, practicability and medical safety of a combination of tiapride and carbamazepine in outpatient detoxification of alcohol dependent patients. Patients were carefully screened for relevant neuropsychiatric disorders and then seen on a daily outpatient basis. RESULTS: A total number of 116 consecutively admitted patients entered the programme; 107 (92%) successfully ended the treatment. The mean initial dose for tiapride was 289 mg and for carbamazepine 502 mg. No serious medical complications or adverse events were observed except for one case of delirium tremens. Only four patients dropped out because of side effects. In general medication was well tolerated. Withdrawal symptomatology as indicated by CIWA-A-scores decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study give further evidence for a combination of tiapride and the anticonvulsant carbamazepine as an effective and safe treatment for outpatient alcohol detoxification in patients with moderate severity of withdrawal syndrome. Further randomized trials are warranted to examine the efficacy of this combination in outpatient alcohol withdrawal.

Non-neuroleptic catecholaminergic drugs for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia.

BACKGROUND: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling movement disorder associated with the prolonged use of neuroleptic medication. Several strategies have been examined in the treatment of TD. Currently, however, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of these drugs in TD and they have been associated with many side effects. One particular strategy would be to use pharmaceutical agents which are known to influence the catecholaminergic system at various junctures. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether catecholaminergic drugs for people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses are associated with a reduction in neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (January 1996), Biological Abstracts (1982-1995), EMBASE (1980-1995), LILACS (1982-1996), MEDLINE (1966-1995) and PsycLIT (1974-1995). We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register again in December 2002 and September 2005. We also searched references of all relevant studies for further trial citations and contacted principal authors of trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected studies if they were randomised controlled trials focusing on people with schizophrenia or other chronic mental illnesses who also suffered from neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. We compared the use of catecholaminergic interventions versus placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently extracted data. For homogenous dichotomous data, we calculated the random effects, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the numbers needed to treat (NNT) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). MAIN RESULTS: We excluded 20 studies, mainly due to an inability to extract data from the first arm of the study crossover. One included study has shown that patients on placebo were no more likely to leave the study early than those on tiapride (n=24). The other included study (n=35) also reported equivocal data (RR 5.28 CI 0.3 to 102.6) for leaving the study early when participants were randomised to either celiprolol or placebo. However, in both studies, sample size was limited. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a large amount of research in this area, most studies were excluded due to inherent problems in the nature of their crossover designs. Usually data are not reported before the crossover and the nature of TD and its likely response to treatments makes it imprudent to use this data. The review provides little usable information for service users or providers and more well designed and reported studies are indicated.

[Autonomic cardiovascular regulation in patients with tics and Tourette syndrome].

Autonomic cardiovascular regulation has been assessed in patients aged 4-15 years with Tourette syndrome (n = 22) and other tic disorders (n = 48). Symptom significance was estimated by a number of hyperkinetic episodes per 20 minutes, tic scale and variants of the disease course. The functional condition of autonomic nervous system was studied clinically and using spectral analysis of heart rate variability in both upright and supine positions. Negative correlation between the ratio of sympathetic and vagus influences and severity of the disease was found: the severer were tic symptoms, the stronger was a trend to vagotonia (beta = -0.36; p < 0.0025; F > 4.0). In orthostatic test, patients with Tourette syndrome demonstrated an unfavorable hypersympathicotonic type of cardiovascular system reaction. Patients were treated during 4 weeks with glycinum (0.2 +/- 0.1 mg/day), phenibutum (0.5 +/- 0.25 mg/day), clonazepam (1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/day), tiapride (200 +/- 100 mg/day), haloperidol (1-1.5 mg/day), rispolept (2 mg/day). There was no negative effect of the drugs on heart rate variability. On the contrary, the therapy reduced hyperkinetic symptoms and corrected autonomic influences on the sinus rhythm. It is suggested that changes in autonomic cardiovascular regulation might be of secondary character and do not need any special correction.

Treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome with combined carbamazepine and tiapride in a patient with probable sleep apnoe syndrome.

The most frequently used agents for treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome are benzodiazepines and clomethiazole. Both have the main disadvantage of potential misuse and respiratory depression. Therefore their use in patients with respiratory diseases is limited. In recent years a treatment strategy with combined carbamazepine and tiapride was reported to be an effective alternative in alcohol withdrawal without the risk of respiratory depression. We report the successful treatment with carbamazepine and tiapride of a patient with probable sleep apnoe syndrome and history of withdrawal-related epileptic seizures.

A randomized, observer-blind, controlled trial of the traditional Chinese medicine Yi-Gan San for improvement of behavioral and psychological symptoms and activities of daily living in dementia patients.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, observer-blind, controlled trial examined the efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese herbal medicine Yi-Gan San (YGS, Yokukan-San in Japanese) in the improvement of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and activities of daily living (ADL). METHOD: Fifty-two patients with mild-to-severe dementia (24 men and 28 women, mean +/- SD age = 80.3 +/- 9.0 years) according to DSM-IV criteria were investigated. Participants were randomly assigned to the YGS group (N = 27) or control (drug-free) group (N = 25) and treated for 4 weeks. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for the assessment of BPSD, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for cognitive function, and the Barthel Index for ADL were administered at baseline and the end of the treatment. The frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and other adverse events was recorded. If patients showed insufficient response to treatment after 1 week, tiapride hydrochloride, a dopamine D(1) selective neuroleptic, was added to the regimen. Data were collected from January 2004 to March 2004. RESULTS: All participants in both groups completed the trial. In the control group, 11 patients required treatment with tiapride hydrochloride. Significant improvements in mean +/- SD NPI (from 37.9 +/- 16.1 to 19.5 +/- 15.6) and Barthel Index (from 56.4 +/- 34.2 to 62.9 +/- 35.2) scores were observed in the YGS group, but not in the control group. MMSE results were unchanged in both groups. EPS were not observed in either group, but dizziness and impaired postural sway were observed in 6 patients treated with tiapride hydrochloride. CONCLUSION: Yi-Gan San improves BPSD and ADL. Follow-up studies using a double-blinded, placebo-controlled design are recommended.

Protective drugs in acute large-dose exposure to organophosphates: a comparison of metoclopramide and tiapride with pralidoxime in rats.

Weak and reversible inhibitors of cholinesterase(s), when coadministered in excess with a more potent inhibitor such as organophosphates, can act in a protective manner. The benzamide compound, metoclopramide, confers some protection (putatively via this mechanism) for cholinesterases against inhibition by paraoxon both in vitro and in vivo, after chronic small-dose exposure. Tiapride is a related benzamide. In this study, we compared the protection by metoclopramide and tiapride in rats acutely exposed to large doses of paraoxon with the therapeutic "gold standard," pralidoxime. Group 1 received 1 micromol paraoxon (approximately 75% lethal dose), Group 2 received 50 micromol metoclopramide, Group 3 received 50 micromol tiapride, Group 4 received 50 micromol pralidoxime, Group 5 received 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol metoclopramide, Group 6 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol tiapride, and Group 7 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol pralidoxime. All substances were administered intraperitoneally. The animals were monitored for 48 h and mortality was recorded at 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 48 h. Blood was taken for red blood cell acetylcholinesterase measurements at baseline, 30 min, 24, and 48 h. With the exception of Group 7, in which some late mortality was observed, mortality occurred mainly in the first 30 min after paraoxon administration with minimal changes occurring thereafter. Mortality at 30 min was 0% in the metoclopramide, tiapride, and pralidoxime groups and 73 +/- 20 (paraoxon), 65 +/- 15 (paraoxon + metoclopramide), 38 +/- 14 (paraoxon + tiapride), and 13 +/- 19 (paraoxon + pralidoxime). Mortality at 48 h was 75 +/- 18 (paraoxon), 67 +/- 17 (paraoxon + metoclopramide), 42 +/- 16 (paraoxon + tiapride), and 27 +/- 24 (paraoxon + pralidoxime). Metoclopramide does not significantly influence mortality after acute large-dose paraoxon exposure. Both tiapride and pralidoxime significantly decreased mortality in our model. The protection conferred by tiapride was significantly less than that conferred by pralidoxime at 30 min, but was not significantly different at 24 and 48 h.