ABSTRACT
In an update of earlier surveys conducted in Connecticut and New Jersey in the mid-1990s, an online survey of private commercial pest control firms engaged in residential tick control showed that the application of synthetic acaricides continues to be the primary method of control used. The carbamate and organophospate acaricides, previously the most commonly used against ticks, have given way to synthetic pyrethroids and, to a lesser extent, the use of natural product/organic acaricides. Typical costs for a single acaricide application today ($100-$200 for a 1 acre [0.4 ha] property) remain similar to those reported from the earlier surveys, although the frequency of applications and, therefore, also the overall annual cost has increased. The application habitats within residential properties, life stages targeted, and application equipment used have not changed appreciably since the mid-1990s. While most survey respondents expressed knowledge of natural product acaricides and Damminix Tick Tubes, many reported that they either did not employ or knew very little about other alternative tick control methods (including entomopathogenic fungus and topical application of acaricides to tick hosts via 4-Poster deer treatment stations or Select TCS rodent bait boxes). This suggests either a failure to adequately inform the pest management industry and their potential client base of the availability of alternate methods, and/or industry concerns about cost and effectiveness of the alternatives.
Subject(s)
Acaricides/economics , Tick Control/methods , Ticks , Animals , Humans , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , Mid-Atlantic Region , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of Brangus and Nellore cattle in an extensive production system. Sixty growing bulls, 30 of the Brangus and 30 of the Nellore breeds that were naturally infested with Rhipicephalus microplus were subdivided into four groups: control Nellore (15 animals), treated Nellore (15), control Brangus (15), and treated Brangus (15). The animals in the treated groups underwent acaricidal treatments for 1 year. Tick counts, acaricidal treatments and animal weighing were performed every 18 days, and the costs of acaricidal, anti-myiasis, and preventive treatments for tick fever were recorded for cost evaluation. The treated Brangus and Nellore groups did not show a significant difference in weight gain, whereas Nellore weight gain was superior in the control groups. The cost of acaricidal treatment throughout the experimental period was $494 US. The costs of the preventive treatment for tick fever and myiasis were $98 US and $15 US, respectively. The highest rates of tick infestation were found in the control group of the Brangus animals, which served as the basis for the suggested implementation of a strategic control program for animals in the growth phase. Nellore animals showed low rates of infestation. Under the conditions of this study, the Nellore animals were more efficient than the Brangus animals because they achieved satisfactory weight gain, similar to the Brangus, and a low tick count even in the control group. This finding demonstrates that expenses related to the acaricidal, anti-myiasis and tick fever treatments are unnecessary in Nellore cattle, making these animals more profitable.
Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/economics , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Rhipicephalus/physiology , Tick Control , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Animals , Brazil , Cattle/classification , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Female , Male , Seasons , Tick Control/economics , Tick Infestations/parasitology , Tick Infestations/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Worldwide, cattle production is struggling to face the negative impacts caused by ticks and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is one of the most harmful ticks for livestock. Most of the people in West Africa depend on cattle farming and subsistence agriculture. The presence of ticks on cattle is a major problem faced by smallholder farmers who fight for their livelihood. National and regional tick control programs could assist these rural communities in protecting their livelihoods against ticks and tick-borne diseases, but only if they take into account the targeted herders and their perception on cattle management and tick control. This paper aims to provide a better insight in the socio-economic characteristics of Beninese cattle farmers, and their perception on tick burden, as well as to document common tick control strategies. Different tick species and their seasonality are well understood by cattle herders. For tick control, many still use manual tick removal, especially in the north of the country. The high cost of acaricides, the lack of financial means of African farmers, and of the local stockbreeders in particular, limits the use of acaricides in livestock breeding in Benin. While aiming to increase the meat or milk production of their animals, stockbreeders who can afford it sometimes turn to an abusive use of acaricides, which might in time lead to an increase in tick resistance. This study remains one of the rare studies to report extensively on the perceptions of West African cattle herders.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Farmers/psychology , Rhipicephalus/parasitology , Tick Control/organization & administration , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Adult , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Benin/epidemiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Livestock , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Program Evaluation , Socioeconomic Factors , Tick Control/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Designing preventive programs relevant to vector-borne diseases such as Lyme disease (LD) can be complex given the need to include multiple issues and perspectives into prioritizing public health actions. A multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) model was previously used to rank interventions for LD prevention in Quebec, Canada, where the disease is emerging. The aim of the current study was to adapt and evaluate the decision model constructed in Quebec under a different epidemiological context, in Switzerland, where LD has been endemic for the last thirty years. The model adaptation was undertaken with a group of Swiss stakeholders using a participatory approach. The PROMETHEE method was used for multi-criteria analysis. Key elements and results of the MCDA model are described and contrasted with the Quebec model. All criteria and most interventions of the MCDA model developed for LD prevention in Quebec were directly transferable to the Swiss context. Four new decision criteria were added, and the list of proposed interventions was modified. Based on the overall group ranking, interventions targeting human populations were prioritized in the Swiss model, with the top ranked action being the implementation of a large communication campaign. The addition of criteria did not significantly alter the intervention rankings, but increased the capacity of the model to discriminate between highest and lowest ranked interventions. The current study suggests that beyond the specificity of the MCDA models developed for Quebec and Switzerland, their general structure captures the fundamental and common issues that characterize the complexity of vector-borne disease prevention. These results should encourage public health organizations to adapt, use and share MCDA models as an effective and functional approach to enable the integration of multiple perspectives and considerations in the prevention and control of complex public health issues such as Lyme disease or other vector-borne and zoonotic diseases.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Ixodes/microbiology , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , Models, Statistical , Tick Control/methods , Zoonoses/prevention & control , Acaricides , Animals , Borrelia burgdorferi/pathogenicity , Borrelia burgdorferi/physiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Humans , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Lyme Disease/microbiology , Public Health , Quebec/epidemiology , Switzerland/epidemiology , Tick Control/economicsABSTRACT
Hematophagous arthropods transmit the etiological agents of numerous diseases and as a result are frequently the targets of sampling to characterize vector and pathogen populations. Arguably, the most commonly used sampling approach involves traps baited with carbon dioxide. We report results of a laboratory study in which the performance of carbon dioxide-baited traps was evaluated using measures of baiting intensity, the amount of carbon dioxide released per unit time during trap deployment. We evaluated the effects of trap design, carbon dioxide source, and wind speed on baiting intensity and documented significant effects of these factors on the length of sampling (time to baiting intensity = 0), maximum baiting intensity, and variation in baiting intensity during experimental trials. Among the three dry ice-baited trap types evaluated, traps utilizing insulated beverage coolers as dry ice containers sampled for the longest period of time, had the lowest maximum but most consistent baiting intensity within trials and were least sensitive to effects of wind speed and dry ice form (block vs. pellet) on baiting intensity. Results of trials involving traps baited with carbon dioxide released from pressurized cylinders suggested that this trap type had performance comparable to dry ice-baited insulated cooler traps but at considerably higher cost.
Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide/pharmacology , Insect Control/methods , Tick Control/methods , Dry Ice , Insect Control/economics , Mosquito Control/economics , Mosquito Control/methods , Tick Control/economics , WindABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Amblyomma variegatum is an important cause of morbidity, mortality and economic losses in Africa and the West Indies. Attempts to control and/or eradicate the tick from the Caribbean have largely been unsuccessful because of difficulties relating to the biology of the three-host tick and problems with applying acaricides on a regular basis to free-ranging domestic ruminants. While plastic collars impregnated with insecticides are widely and effectively used in companion animals to control external parasites there is little information on this technology in ruminants. METHODS: Over 21 months we tested the efficacy of slow-release plastic tags impregnated with deltamethrin (7%) and aggregation-attachment pheromones (DPITs) in controlling A. variegatum on free-ranging cattle on two farms on St. Kitts. The tags were replaced every three months or when found to be lost. RESULTS: On sentinel animals fitted with tags containing only aggregation-attachment pheromones there were an average of 23.1 ticks per semi-monthly visit although this number varied considerably, peaking in the dry season around May and being lowest in August to October during the wet season. Significantly fewer ticks (3.5 on average) were found on cattle with DPITs at each visit (P < 0.001). Although the DIPTs provided good control (92% on average), they did not significantly reduce A. variegatum in the environment with tick numbers on sentinels being higher in the second year of the study, despite up to 44% of animals being fitted with DPITs. The tags were economical, costing 0.2% of the 1% flumethrin pour-on treatment widely recommended for A. variegatum control in the Caribbean. The major problem encountered was that 38% of tail tags were lost before they were due for replacement every three months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that DPITs are cheap to produce, easy to place, only require handling of animals every three months, and are very effective in protecting cattle from A. variegatum. Before DPITs can be considered for eradication programs the problems needing to be addressed include loss of tail tags, particularly in thick vegetation, and the optimum number of animals that must be treated to reduce numbers of ticks in the environment.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Insecticides/pharmacology , Ixodidae/drug effects , Nitriles/pharmacology , Pheromones/pharmacology , Pyrethrins/pharmacology , Tick Control/instrumentation , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Insecticides/economics , Nitriles/economics , Pheromones/economics , Pyrethrins/economics , Seasons , Sentinel Surveillance , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/methods , Tick Infestations/economics , Tick Infestations/epidemiology , Tick Infestations/prevention & control , Tick Infestations/veterinary , West Indies/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Hyalomma scupense (syn. Hyalomma detritum) is a two-host domestic endophilic tick of cattle and secondarily other ungulates in the Maghreb region (Africa). This species transmits several pathogens, among which two are major livestock diseases: Theileria annulata and Theileria equi. Various other pathogens are also transmitted by this tick species, such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Ehrlichia bovis. Hyalomma scupense is common in sub-humid and semi-arid areas of several regions in the world, mainly in the Maghreb region. In this region, adults attach to animals during the summer season; larvae and nymphs attach to their hosts during autumn, but there is a regional difference in H. scupense phenology. There is an overlap between immature and adult ticks, leading in some contexts to a dramatic modification of the epidemiology of tick-borne diseases. This tick species attaches preferentially to the posterior udder quarters and thighs. Tick burdens can reach 130 ticks per animal, with a mean of 60 ticks. Calves are 70 times less infested than adult cattle. The control can be implemented through six options: (i) rehabilitation of the farm buildings by roughcasting and smoothing the outer and inner surfaces of the enclosures and walls. This control option should be recommended to be combined with a thorough cleaning of the farm and its surrounding area. With regard to Theileria annulata infection, this control option is the most beneficial. (ii) Acaricide application to animals during the summer season, targeting adults. (iii) Acaricide application during the autumn period for the control of the immature stages. (iv) Acaricide application to the walls: many field veterinarians have suggested this option but it is only partially efficient since nymphs enter deep into the cracks and crevices. It should be used if there is a very high tick burden or if there is a high risk of tick-borne diseases. (v) Manual tick removal: this method is not efficient since the ticks can feed on several other animal species in the farm. This control option can lead to a reduction of the tick population, but not a decrease in tick-borne disease incidence. (vi) Vaccination: this control option consists of injecting the protein Hd86; trials have shown a partial effect on nymphs, with no effect on adult ticks. Combination of two of these control options is recommended in regions where there are high burdens of important tick vectors. Further studies are needed to improve our knowledge on this tick species in the Maghreb region, since the number of published studies on Hyalomma scupense in this region is very limited.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/transmission , Endemic Diseases/veterinary , Ixodidae , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Acaricides/administration & dosage , Africa, Northern/epidemiology , Animals , Arachnid Vectors/microbiology , Arachnid Vectors/parasitology , Arachnid Vectors/physiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Climate , Female , Housing, Animal , Ixodidae/microbiology , Ixodidae/parasitology , Ixodidae/physiology , Life Cycle Stages , Male , Seasons , Species Specificity , Theileria annulata , Theileriasis/epidemiology , Theileriasis/transmission , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/methods , Tick Infestations/complications , Tick Infestations/drug therapy , Tick Infestations/economics , Tick Infestations/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/microbiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Tick-Borne Diseases/transmission , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Vaccination/veterinaryABSTRACT
Parasitic Tropilaelaps (Delfinado and Baker) mites are a damaging pest of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in Asia. These mites represent a significant threat if introduced to other regions of the world, warranting implementation of Tropilaelaps mite surveillance in uninfested regions. Current Tropilaelaps mite-detection methods are unsuitable for efficient large scale screening. We developed and tested a new bump technique that consists of firmly rapping a honey bee brood frame over a collecting pan. Our method was easier to implement than current detection tests, reduced time spent in each apiary, and minimized brood destruction. This feasibility increase overcomes the test's decreased rate of detecting infested colonies (sensitivity; 36.3% for the bump test, 54.2% and 56.7% for the two most sensitive methods currently used in Asia). Considering this sensitivity, we suggest that screening programs sample seven colonies per apiary (independent of apiary size) and 312 randomly selected apiaries in a region to be 95% sure of detecting an incipient Tropilaelaps mite invasion. Further analyses counter the currently held view that Tropilaelaps mites prefer drone bee brood cells. Tropilaelaps mite infestation rate was 3.5 +/- 0.9% in drone brood and 5.7 +/- 0.6% in worker brood. We propose the bump test as a standard tool for monitoring of Tropilaelaps mite presence in regions thought to be free from infestation. However, regulators may favor the sensitivity of the Drop test (collecting mites that fall to the bottom of a hive on sticky boards) over the less time-intensive Bump test.
Subject(s)
Acari/physiology , Beekeeping/methods , Bees/parasitology , Tick Control/methods , Animals , Bees/growth & development , Larva/growth & development , Larva/parasitology , Population Density , Pupa/growth & development , Pupa/parasitology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thailand , Tick Control/economicsABSTRACT
East Coast fever (ECF) causes considerable mortality and production losses in the Tanzania smallholder dairy sector and limits the introduction of improved dairy breeds in areas where the disease is present. The infection and treatment method (ITM) was adopted by smallholder dairy farms for ECF immunisation in Hanang and Handeni districts of Tanzania. This study recorded incidence rates for ECF and other tick-borne diseases (TBDs) for ECF-immunised and non-immunised cattle between 1997 and 2000. Approximately 80% of smallholder households from both sites (n = 167) participated in this longitudinal study, with immunisations carried out at the request of the livestock owners. Efficacy of ITM for preventing ECF cases in these crossbred dairy cattle was estimated at 97.6%, while that for preventing ECF deaths was 97.9%. One percent of the cattle developed clinical ECF as a result of immunisation. Since ECF immunisation permits a reduction in acaricide use, an increase in other TBDs is a potential concern. Sixty-three percent of farmers continued to use the same acaricide after immunisation, with 80% of these reducing the frequency of applications. Overall, 78% of farmers increased the acaricide application interval after immunisation beyond that recommended by the manufacturer, resulting in annual savings in the region of USD 4.77 per animal. No statistical difference was observed between the immunised and non-immunised animals in the incidence of non-ECF TBDs. However, immunised animals that succumbed to these diseases showed fewer case fatalities. ITM would therefore appear to be a suitable method for ECF control in Tanzania's smallholder dairy sector.
Subject(s)
Immunization/veterinary , Protozoan Vaccines/therapeutic use , Theileriasis/immunology , Theileriasis/prevention & control , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Acaricides/economics , Acaricides/therapeutic use , Animals , Cattle , Dairying , Immunization/economics , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Protozoan Vaccines/economics , Protozoan Vaccines/immunology , Tanzania/epidemiology , Theileriasis/epidemiology , Theileriasis/parasitology , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Heartwater is an economically serious tick-borne disease of ruminants caused by the intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia ruminantium. The disease has traditionally been controlled by four different approaches: controlling the tick vector by dipping, establishing endemic stability, performing immunisation by infection and treatment, and preventing the disease by regular administration of prophylactic antibiotics. The first three of these methods are subject to failure for various epidemiological reasons, and serious disease outbreaks can occur. Prophylaxis is effective, but very expensive, and the logistics are daunting when large herds of animals are involved. The development of a safe, cheap and effective vaccine is the only likely way in which heartwater can be economically controlled, and over the past 15 years three new types of experimental vaccine have been developed: inactivated, attenuated, and recombinant vaccines. These new vaccines have shown varying degrees of promise, but none is as yet sufficiently successful to be marketable. We describe the experimental products, and the various technical and biological difficulties which are being encountered, and report on ways in which new technologies are being used to improve vaccine effectiveness.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Ehrlichia ruminantium , Heartwater Disease/prevention & control , Tick Control/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/economics , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/veterinary , Bacterial Vaccines/economics , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Ehrlichia ruminantium/drug effects , Ehrlichia ruminantium/immunology , Ehrlichia ruminantium/pathogenicity , Heartwater Disease/economics , Tick Control/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated , Vaccines, Inactivated , Vaccines, SyntheticABSTRACT
From 1997 to 2002, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Northeast Area-wide Tick Control Project used acaricide-treated 4-Poster Deer Treatment Bait Stations in five eastern states to control ticks feeding on white-tailed deer. The objectives of this host-targeted technology were to reduce free-living blacklegged (Ixodes scapularis Say) and lone star (Amblyomma americanum [L.]) tick populations and thereby to reduce the risk of tick-borne disease. During 2002 to 2004, treatments were suspended, and tick population recovery rates were assayed. Subsequently, the major factors that influenced variations in efficacy were extrapolated to better understand and improve this technology. Treatments resulted in significant reductions in free-living populations of nymphal blacklegged ticks at six of the seven sites, and lone star ticks were significantly reduced at all three sites where they were present. During the study, maximal significant (p < or = 0.05) efficacies against nymphal blacklegged and lone star ticks at individual sites ranged from 60.0 to 81.7 and 90.9 to 99.5%, respectively. The major environmental factor that reduced efficacy was the occurrence of heavy acorn masts, which provided an alternative food resource for deer. Although the 4-Poster technology requires 1 or more years to show efficacy, this host-targeted intervention was demonstrated to be an efficacious, economical, safe, and environment-friendly alternative to area-wide spraying of acaricide to control free-living populations of these tick species.
Subject(s)
Acaricides/administration & dosage , Deer/parasitology , Ixodidae/growth & development , Tick Control/methods , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Analysis of Variance , Animal Feed , Animals , Humans , Mid-Atlantic Region , New England , Population Density , Program Evaluation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/standards , Tick Control/trends , Tick Infestations/prevention & control , United States , United States Department of Agriculture , Zea maysABSTRACT
A survey to document tick control methods used by resource-limited farmers in the control of cattle ticks in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa was conducted by interviewing 59 cattle farmers using structured questionnaires and general conversation. Information collected was on external parasites of cattle, their effects and their control methods. Ticks were reported to be a major problem causing diseases like anaplasmosis (89.8%), babesiosis (55.9%) and ehrlichiosis (16.9%), as well as wounds that predispose to screwworm infestation, tick worry and teat damage to cows troubling farmers in their farming enterprises. The main tick control methods were; acaricides provided by government, however 94.9% of the farmers interviewed were of the opinion that the dip wash is not effective in killing the ticks. As a result, farmers complement the government dipping service with their own initiatives like spraying with conventional acaricides (22%), household disinfectants such as Jeyes fluid (18.6%), used engine oil (10.2%), chickens (5.1%), manual removal (5.1%), and pouricides (1.7%). In addition, some farmers also use plants (6.8%), mainly the leaf of Aloe ferox and the bark of Ptaeroxylon obliquum. The study revealed ticks to be a major problem in the study area.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Tick Control/methods , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Insecticides/pharmacology , Plants, Medicinal , Seasons , South Africa , Tick Control/economics , Tick Infestations/prevention & control , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinaryABSTRACT
A longitudinal economic impact study of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases (TTBDs) in cattle around Lake Mburo National Park (LMNP) was done. Impact was valued using Uganda Shilling (Ug. Shs) (exchange rate of 1USD to Ug. Shs 1,420). The costs for controlling TTBDs was constituting 85.6 +/- 3.2% (pastoral) and 73.8 +/- 4.2% (ranches) to total disease control costs. The main costs were on tick control, constituting 83.1% (ranches) and 87.9% (pastoral). In pastoral herds, the costs were negatively correlated to herd size (r = -0.99). The mean annual cost per cattle for controlling TTBDs for ranch and pastoral herds was similar Ug. Shs 5,900 +/- 545. The mean annual Economic Cost (EC) of TTBDs per cattle was not significantly different (p > 0.05) between pastoral (Ug. Shs 6,700 +/- 580) and ranch herds (Ug. Shs 7,600 +/- 970). The mean annual EC per cattle was negatively correlated (r = -0.99) with herd size in pastoral systems contrary to positive correlation (r = 0.99) observed among the ranches. The major component of EC of TTBDs of 88.2% (pastoral) and 78.6% (ranches) was due to their control. The other component was owed to mortality, which was positively correlated (p < 0.01) to the ranch herd size. The total annual EC of TTBDs around LMNP was Ug. Shs 437,754,600 (USD 308,144).
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Tick Control/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Ticks/growth & development , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tick-Borne Diseases/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Uganda/epidemiologyABSTRACT
A cross-sectional study based on clinical examination, inspection of herd health records and a questionnaire was designed to determine the epidemiology, economics and potential impact of immunisation against theileriosis in Tanzania. The results showed annual theileriosis costs to be US$ 205.40 per head, whereas the introduction of immunisation reduced this by 40-68% depending on the post immunisation dipping strategy adopted. Morbidity risk due to theileriosis was 0.048 in immunised and 0.235 in non-immunised cattle, and the difference was significant (chi(2)=66.7; P=0.000). The questionnaire results indicated that immunised cattle had a significantly (chi(2)=6; P=0.015) higher risk of anaplasmosis compared with non-immunised cattle, whereas the risk of bovine babesiosis did not differ significantly (chi(2)=0.06; P=0.807) between the two groups. Mortality risk due to anaplasmosis was 0.046 in immunised and 0.018 in non-immunised cattle and this difference was statistically significant (chi(2)=4.48; P=0.043). The theileriosis mortality risk was 0.203 in the non-immunised cattle, while the risk was 0.009 in the immunised cattle and these differences were also significant (chi(2)=103; P=0.000). It was concluded that farmers who have immunised their cattle may cautiously cut down acaricide application by 50% for extensively grazed herds and by 75% for zero grazed animals depending on the level of tick challenge at the herd level.
Subject(s)
Theileriasis/economics , Theileriasis/epidemiology , Animals , Cattle , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Insecticides/pharmacology , Protozoan Vaccines/economics , Protozoan Vaccines/immunology , Tanzania/epidemiology , Theileriasis/prevention & control , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/methods , Vaccination/veterinaryABSTRACT
Tick-borne diseases, namely, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, cowdriosis and theileriosis, constrain cattle production and improvement in Tanzania, leading to considerable economic losses. A simple spreadsheet model was used to estimate the economic losses resulting from production losses, treatment and control costs associated with tick-borne diseases (TBD) in Tanzania. Model parameters included the national cattle population, reported TBD morbidity, fatality risk, and chemotherapy and control measures used. The total annual national loss due TBD was estimated to be 364 million USD, including an estimated mortality of 1.3 million cattle. Theileriosis accounted for 68% of the total loss, while anaplasmosis and babesiosis each accounted for 13% and cowdriosis accounted for 6% of the total loss. Costs associated with mortality, chemotherapy and acaricide application accounted for 49%, 21% and 14% of the total estimated annual TBD losses, respectively, infection and treatment method milk loss and weight loss accounted for 1%, 6% and 9% of the total annual loss, respectively. Despite the inadequacies of the data used, the results give evidence that tick-borne diseases inflict substantial economic losses on cattle production and resource use in Tanzania.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/economics , Tick Control/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Anaplasmosis/drug therapy , Anaplasmosis/economics , Anaplasmosis/epidemiology , Anaplasmosis/mortality , Animals , Babesiosis/drug therapy , Babesiosis/economics , Babesiosis/epidemiology , Babesiosis/veterinary , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/mortality , Female , Heartwater Disease/drug therapy , Heartwater Disease/economics , Heartwater Disease/epidemiology , Heartwater Disease/mortality , Male , Prevalence , Tanzania , Theileriasis/drug therapy , Theileriasis/economics , Theileriasis/epidemiology , Theileriasis/mortality , Tick Control/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/drug therapy , Tick-Borne Diseases/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Tick control is critical to the control of tick borne disease, while the direct impact of ticks on livestock productivity is also well known. For livestock, tick control today rests overwhelmingly on the twin approaches of genetics and chemical acaricides, although the disadvantages and limitations of both are recognized. The achievement of the full potential of vaccination, the application of biocontrol agents and the coordinated management of the existing technologies all pose challenging research problems. Progress in many areas has been steady over the last decade, while the acquisition of molecular information has now reached a revolutionary stage. This is likely to have immediate impact on the identification of potential antigens for improved vaccines and novel targets for acaricide action. In many circumstances, the rate limiting step in making scientific progress will remain unchanged, namely the resource constraint on evaluating these appropriately in large animals. For other approaches, such as the use of biocontrol agents, the limitation is likely to be less in the identification of suitable agents than in their delivery in an efficient and cost effective way. Our scientific understanding of the molecular basis for the tick vector-tick borne disease interaction is in its infancy but the area is both challenging and, in the long term, likely to be of great practical importance. What is arguably the most difficult problem of all remains: the translation of laboratory research into the extremely diverse parasite control requirements of farming systems in a way that is practically useful.
Subject(s)
Host-Parasite Interactions/physiology , Research , Tick Control/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Ticks/immunology , Animals , Genomics , Host-Parasite Interactions/genetics , Humans , Insecticides/pharmacology , Pest Control, Biological/methods , Pest Control, Biological/standards , Research/standards , Research Design , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/standards , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology , Ticks/genetics , Ticks/parasitology , Vaccination/standardsABSTRACT
In response to uncertainty among cattle producers in Australia regarding the need to treat Bos indicus and B. indicus crossbreeds, the scientific literature relating to the productivity effects of Boophilus microplus on cattle of all breeds was reviewed. Estimates of the mean effect of each engorging tick (damage coefficient, d) were made from a simple analysis of the reported data. On average, each engorging female tick is responsible for the loss of 1.37 +/- 0.25 g bodyweight in B. taurus cattle. The comparable value for B. taurusxB. indicus cattle is 1.18 +/- 0.21 g/engorging tick. These values were not statistically significantly different, indicating that if a threshold approach to tick control were taken, then the threshold number of standard ticks would be the same regardless of cattle genotype. No studies provided useable estimates of the effect of tick infestation on pure B. indicus cattle. An economic threshold for treatment, below which acaricide application is not beneficial, can be predicted, using known values for the cost of acaricide application and the price of beef. However, the application of a threshold approach to control has not been embraced by government advisers and runs contrary to the accepted principals of strategic control programs.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/immunology , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Crosses, Genetic , Insecticides/pharmacology , Tick Control , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Animals , Australia , Breeding , Cattle/genetics , Cattle Diseases/economics , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Female , Insecticides/adverse effects , Insecticides/economics , Male , Tick Control/economics , Tick Control/methods , Tick Infestations/economics , Tick Infestations/immunology , Tick Infestations/prevention & control , Ticks/growth & development , Treatment Outcome , Weight LossABSTRACT
Effects of a novel pesticide resistance management strategy on tick control are evaluated in this study. The study is based on a temporal analysis of tick management practices on a smallholding in western Kenya. Results are reported of an innovation to tackle individual resistance in a pair of alternative pesticides using relay application. Incidence of tick-borne diseases at the farm were reduced from 79.6% per annum to 4.5% and no cases were observed in the last two years of the study. Negative cross-resistance is believed to be the mechanism in play for this effective tick control practice. Tick-borne disease control and management costs were halved in comparison to application of a single ineffective pesticide at the same treatment frequency. The acaricide relay strategy is suitable for smallholdings and is expected to significantly extend the useful lifespan of the pesticide pair.
Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Insecticide Resistance , Insecticides/pharmacology , Tick Control/methods , Tick-Borne Diseases/veterinary , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/economics , Dairying/methods , Female , Insecticide Resistance/drug effects , Insecticides/economics , Kenya , Tick Control/economics , Tick Infestations/economics , Tick Infestations/prevention & control , Tick Infestations/veterinary , Tick-Borne Diseases/economics , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & control , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Ticks and tick-borne diseases affect animal and human health worldwide and are the cause of significant economic losses. Approximately 10% of the currently known 867 tick species act as vectors of a broad range of pathogens of domestic animals and humans and are also responsible for damage directly due to their feeding behaviour. The most important tick species and the effects they cause are listed. The impact on the global economy is considered to be high and although some estimates are given, there is a lack of reliable data. The impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on animal production and public health and their control are discussed.