Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
Indian J Pathol Microbiol ; 65(1): 65-75, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35074968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Liposarcomas including atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPSs) display a histomorphological spectrum with their several diagnostic mimics. Murine double minute 2(MDM2) gene amplification characterizes ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS. Presently, there is no documented study from our subcontinent on the validation of MDM2 gene testing in these tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight cases, diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS (n = 5) and DDLPSs (n = 23), along with 10 other tumors were tested for MDM2 gene amplification, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on tissue microarrays (TMAs). Fourteen cases, diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS, along with 49 other tumors were tested for MDM2 immunostaining. Twenty tumors were tested for p16INK4a immunostaining. RESULTS: FISH was interpretable in 25 (89.2%) cases. Among the 20 cases diagnosed as DDLPSs, 19 displayed MDM2 gene amplification. Among the 5 cases diagnosed as ALT/WDLPS, four showed MDM2 gene amplification. Finally, 19 cases were confirmed as DDLPS and 4 as ALT/WDLPS. Furthermore, 7/19 cases confirmed as DDLPS and all 4 cases as ALT/WDLPS tested for MDM2 immunostaining, displayed its diffuse immunoexpression, while a single case of DDLPS showed its focal immunostaining. None of the 49 control cases displayed diffuse MDM2 immunoexpression. ALL 16 DDLPSs and 4 cases of ALT/WDLPS displayed p16INK4a immunostaining. The sensitivity for diffuse MDM2 immunostaining was 87.5% in cases of DDLPS, 100% in ALT/WDLPS, and specificity was 100%. The sensitivity for MDM2 gene amplification was 94.7% in cases of DDLPS and 100% in cases of ALT/WDLPS. The sensitivity for p16INK4a was 100%. CONCLUSION: This constitutes the first sizable study on MDM2 testing in ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS from our subcontinent using TMAs. MDM2 gene amplification testing continues as the diagnostic gold standard for ALTs/WDLPSs and DDLPSs and is useful in cases of diagnostic dilemmas. Diffuse MDM2 (IF2 clone) and p16INK4a immunostaining, together seem useful for triaging cases for FISH.


Subject(s)
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Liposarcoma/genetics , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2/genetics , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cell Dedifferentiation , Female , Humans , Liposarcoma/classification , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/standards , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/genetics , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
2.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(10): 1867-1874, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34272264

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scoring of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining is often done by non-pathologists, especially in large-scale tissue microarray (TMA)-based studies. Studies on the validity and reproducibility of scoring results from non-pathologists are limited. Therefore, our main aim was to assess interobserver agreement between trained non-pathologists and an experienced histopathologist for three IHC markers with different subcellular localization (nucleus/membrane/cytoplasm). METHODS: Three non-pathologists were trained in recognizing adenocarcinoma and IHC scoring by a senior histopathologist. Kappa statistics were used to analyze interobserver and intraobserver agreement for 6,249 TMA cores from a colorectal cancer series. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists (independently scored) and the histopathologist was "substantial" for nuclear and membranous IHC markers (κrange = 0.67-0.75 and κrange = 0.61-0.69, respectively), and "moderate" for the cytoplasmic IHC marker (κrange = 0.43-0.57). Scores of the three non-pathologists were also combined into a "combination score" (if at least two non-pathologists independently assigned the same score to a core, this was the combination score). This increased agreement with the pathologist (κnuclear = 0.74; κmembranous = 0.73; κcytopasmic = 0.57). Interobserver agreement between non-pathologists was "substantial" (κnuclear = 0.78; κmembranous = 0.72; κcytopasmic = 0.61). Intraobserver agreement of non-pathologists was "substantial" to "almost perfect" (κnuclear,range = 0.83-0.87; κmembranous,range = 0.75-0.82; κcytopasmic = 0.69). Overall, agreement was lowest for the cytoplasmic IHC marker. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that adequately trained non-pathologists are able to generate reproducible IHC scoring results, that are similar to those of an experienced histopathologist. A combination score of at least two non-pathologists yielded optimal results. IMPACT: Non-pathologists can generate reproducible IHC results after appropriate training, making analyses of large-scale molecular pathological epidemiology studies feasible within an acceptable time frame.


Subject(s)
Pathology/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Breast Cancer ; 28(4): 977-982, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591465

ABSTRACT

HER2 amplification is seen in 20-25% of primary breast cancer cases, and HER2 detection is performed routinely in primary operable, as well as metastatic breast cancer patients. Currently, HER2 is the only gene of which amplification is routinely assayed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, histochemical assay (FISH/IHC) of multiple target genes is laborious and time-consuming, and simultaneous amplification by microarray is preferred. OncoScan™ is a microarray-based assay capable of whole-genome copy number analysis using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the impact of tumor cellularity on the accuracy of OncoScan™ in the determination of HER2 amplification. Our results demonstrated that HER2 amplification by OncoScan™ is accurate, and has a high concordance rate of 93.3% with FISH. However, the concordance rate is poor (66.7%) in cases with a tumor cellularity < 20%. Nevertheless, the addition of FISH to breast tumors with a tumor cellularity < 20% and a HER2 copy number of 4 appears to be useful to minimize false-negative results by OncoScan™.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Amplification , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Array Analysis/instrumentation , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
4.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 29(5): 327-334, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32324630

ABSTRACT

Laboratories worldwide find it challenging to identify enough tissues and cases for verification and validation studies of low-incidence, rare antigens. These antigens have a low frequency of occurrence in the population, or have little or no expression in normal tissues. Validation studies are essential to assure testing standardization before introducing a new instrument, product, or test into the clinical laboratory. The College of American Pathologists has published comprehensive guidelines for the verification and validation of new immunohistochemical tests introduced into the laboratory menu. Within the guidelines, varied numbers of cases are required for nonpredictive versus predictive markers. However, regarding low-incidence antigens, the laboratory medical director determines the extent of validation required. Recommended practical solutions available to clinical laboratories for low-incidence validation include developing internal resources using the laboratory information system with retrospective and prospective search(s) of archival material and purchase of tissue microarray blocks, slides, or cell lines from external resources. Utilization of homemade multitissue blocks has proved to be extremely valuable in biomarker research and demonstrated great utility in clinical immunohistochemistry laboratories. Participation in External Quality Assessment program(s) may provide insufficient numbers or the ability to calculate concordance rates. However, supplementation with in-house tissues can allow a laboratory to reach the optimal number of cases needed for verification and/or validation schemes. An alternative approach is conducting a thorough literature search and correlating staining patterns of the new test to the expected results. These solutions may be used uniquely or together to assure consistent standardized testing.


Subject(s)
Immunohistochemistry/standards , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
5.
Prenat Diagn ; 41(3): 376-383, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33128404

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal-microarray-analysis (CMA) can identify variants of uncertain clinical significance, susceptibility-loci for neurodevelopmental conditions, and risk for adult-onset conditions. We explored choices made by couples undergoing prenatal CMA, their understanding of these findings, reasons for and against receiving them, and whether they believe parents or professionals should decide which are disclosed. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women (n = 27) or their partners (n = 15) during the week following prenatal CMA testing and analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Over half the interviewees (55%) recalled at least two of the three types of CMA results they chose whether to receive. Sixty-four percent found the choice simple, whereas 36% found it difficult. All participants could clearly explain their choices, which were based on the perceived actionability and psychological impact of the information. Sixty percent viewed their choice favorably, whereas ~21% would have preferred clinicians to decide for them. More women than men, and more decisive than indecisive participants supported parental choice. CONCLUSION: Overall, expectant parents can make informed choices about which uncertain findings about their fetuses they wish to receive, and value the opportunity to tailor results to their values and wishes. Arguments presented provide the basis for a decision-aid tool for expecting parents.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Sexual Partners/psychology , Adult , Female , Genetic Counseling/standards , Genetic Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Uncertainty
6.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 28(4): 325-330, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033496

ABSTRACT

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are important tools to conserve precious tissue resources from increasingly smaller biopsies and to control experimental costs and variation across sample sets. The quality assurance assessment of TMA materials created at centralized biobanks has not been standardized. Herein, we outline 2 processes for the construction of TMAs ("recipient block" and "tape" methods) and the associated preconstruction quality control measures (pathology review, protein and RNA assessment, map creation, and storage conditions) developed by the AIDS Cancer Specimen Resource (ACSR) Network's Science and Technology Core. These steps provide a suggested framework for quality assessment that allows end-users, receiving materials from tissue banks, confidence in their experimental results.


Subject(s)
Paraffin Embedding , Quality Control , Tissue Array Analysis , Humans , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
7.
J Histochem Cytochem ; 67(5): 309-334, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30879407

ABSTRACT

Optimization and standardization of immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols within and between laboratories requires reproducible positive and negative control samples. In many situations, suitable tissue or cell line controls are not available. We demonstrate here a method to incorporate target antigens into synthetic protein gels that can serve as IHC controls. The method can use peptides, protein domains, or whole proteins as antigens, and is compatible with a variety of fixation protocols. The resulting gels can be used to create tissue microarrays (TMAs) with a range of antigen concentrations that can be used to objectively quantify and calibrate chromogenic, fluorescent, or mass spectrometry-based IHC protocols. The method offers an opportunity to objectively quantify IHC staining results, and to optimize and standardize IHC protocols within and between laboratories. (J Histochem Cytochem 58:XXX-XXX, 2019).


Subject(s)
Antigens/analysis , Gels/chemistry , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Animals , Formaldehyde/chemistry , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Mice , Staining and Labeling/methods , Staining and Labeling/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Tissue Fixation/methods , Tissue Fixation/standards
8.
Genomics ; 111(4): 950-957, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29902512

ABSTRACT

Genotyping arrays characterize genome-wide SNPs for a study cohort and were the primary technology behind genome wide association studies over the last decade. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is one of the largest cancer consortium studies, and it collected genotyping data for all of its participants. Using TCGA SNP data genotyped using the Affymetrix 6.0 SNP array from 12,064 samples, we conducted a comprehensive comparisons across DNA sources (tumor tissue, normal tissue, and blood) and sample storage protocols (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) vs. freshly frozen (FF)), examining genotypes, transition/transversion ratios, and mutation catalogues. During the analysis, we made important observations in relevance to the data quality issues. SNP concordance was excellent between blood and normal tissues, and slightly lower between blood and tumor tissue due to potential somatic mutations in the tumors. The observed poor SNP concordance between FFPE and FF samples suggested a batch effect. The transition/transversion ratio, a metric commonly used for quality control purpose in exome sequencing projects, appeared less applicable for genotyping array data due to the whole-genome coverage built into the array design. Moreover, there were substantially more loss of heterozygosity events than gain of heterozygosity when comparing tumors relative to normal tissues and blood. This might be a consequence of extensive copy number deletions in tumors. In summary, our thorough evaluation calls for more adequate quality control practices and provides guidelines for improved application of TCGA genotyping data.


Subject(s)
Genotyping Techniques/methods , Neoplasms/genetics , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Databases, Genetic/standards , Genotyping Techniques/standards , Humans , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
9.
Eur J Cancer ; 106: 234-243, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30528808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted first-line use of atezolizumab and pembrolizumab in patients with metastasised urothelial carcinoma by defining distinct programmed cell death ligand-1 cut-offs. We analysed the diagnostic performance of all FDA/EMA-approved programmed cell death ligand-1 assays with emphasis on new restrictions for first-line treatment with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-one urothelial carcinomas were analysed on tissue microarrays with four cores of each tumour. Stains were performed in certified laboratories on Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Dako Link 48 autostainers. Stains were read on an assay-by-assay basis by two trained pathologists. Overall percentage agreement (OPA) was calculated across the preset cut-offs. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) and negative percentage agreement (NPA) were calculated across different scoring algorithms. Venn diagrams were constructed to illustrate discordance according to the recent FDA/EMA guidelines. RESULTS: The Dako 28-8, 22c3 and the Ventana SP263 assays showed high interassay correlation (r-range 0.83-0.91). Interassay correlation between the Ventana SP142 and the three other assays was moderate (r-range 0.66-0.75). OPA of 93.3% was achieved between the Dako 28-8, 22c3 and Ventana SP263 assays. OPA including the SP142 was 84.1%. Pooled PPA and NPA of different scoring algorithms was 89.4% and 95.3% for the Dako 28-8, 22c3 and the SP263 assays, respectively. With the SP142 assay, pooled PPA was 59.1%. The SP142 assay identifies fewer eligible patients for first-line treatment with atezolizumab/pembrolizumab. CONCLUSION: Dako 28-8, 22c3 and SP263 assays show interchangeable performance. The SP142 assay shows divergent staining results. Interassay variability leads to different detection rates of eligible patients for first-line treatment with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma/immunology , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/immunology , Urothelium/immunology , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Biomarkers, Tumor/antagonists & inhibitors , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/secondary , Clinical Decision-Making , Humans , Observer Variation , Patient Selection , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urothelium/drug effects , Urothelium/pathology
11.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1771: 3-8, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633200

ABSTRACT

Over the last decades the application of cell-based assays and in vitro cell culture systems has fundamentally transformed our understanding of biological functions on a cellular and organism level. The resulting ubiquitous usage of cell-based assays in today's scientific world has therefore generated a need for advanced in vitro diagnostic systems. This increased demand has further led to the development of miniaturized live-cell microarrays for biomedical applications including high-throughput screening tools and microfluidic systems. The greatest benefit of miniaturized cell analysis systems is the ability to provide quantitative data in real time with high reliability and sensitivity, which are key parameters for any cell-based assay. An additional advantage of live-cell microarrays is their inherent capability for large-scale screening of single cells, multicell populations, as well as spheroids.


Subject(s)
Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Animals , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
12.
Methods Mol Biol ; 1771: 27-40, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29633202

ABSTRACT

Plasma micro-nanotexturing is a generic technology for topographical and chemical modification of surfaces and their implementation in microfluidics and microarrays. Nanotextured surfaces with desirable chemical functionality (and wetting behavior) have shown excellent biomolecule immobilization and cell adhesion. Specifically, nanotextured hydrophilic areas show (a) strong binding of biomolecules and (b) strong adhesion of cells, while nanotextured superhydrophobic areas show null adsorption of (a) proteins and (b) cells. Here we describe the protocols for (a) biomolecule adsorption control on nanotextured surfaces for microarray fabrication and (b) cell adhesion on such surfaces. 3D plasma nanotextured® substrates are commercialized through Nanoplasmas private company, a spin-off of the National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos.


Subject(s)
Nanotechnology , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Animals , Immunoassay/methods , Mice , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
13.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 26(9): 676-681, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28248725

ABSTRACT

The use of controls is a hallmark for quality control in anatomic pathology. However, standardization of controls between laboratories has been a significant issue. Differential processing techniques between institutions and a multitude of preanalytical difficulties can result in different immunostain intensities. So called histoid controls, xenografts or culture cell lines, have been discussed in the past but with no recent followup. Herein is presented a histoid termed a 3D tissue microarray control (3D TMAC) control to help alleviate the burgeoning need for control standardization. A breast and cervix 3D TMAC control were tested for staining quality for 11 different antibodies commonly tested in either breast or cervical cancer work ups. We additionally looked at a small run of 5 days of CK5 and HER2 for reproducibility of the 3DRSTMA. Staining quality of 9 of the antibodies stained appropriately and 2 stained inappropriately, mammoglobin and GCDFP. Two of the antibodies were not reported to have any staining properties in the 3D TMAC, p16 and mammoglobin. Of these, p16 had appropriate staining and mammoglobin did not. In the 5 runs of CK5 and HER2, there was good reproducibility between stains assessed by both visual and computer-assisted methods, with membrane intensity coefficients of variation of 3.58% and 3.18%, respectively. The 3D TMAC has the potential to markedly improve intralaboratory and interlaboratory standardization practices.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Staining and Labeling , Tissue Array Analysis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Staining and Labeling/methods , Staining and Labeling/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
14.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 67(3): 471-481, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29214427

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study is to evaluate PD-L1 prevalence and its association with major clinical characteristics in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients to inform the clinical development of anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents in this population. We used phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression through IHC as a surrogate tissue quality marker to screen surgical NSCLC samples in tissue microarray (TMA; 172 cases) or whole-section (268 cases) format. The samples were then analyzed with a clinically validated PD-L1 IHC assay. The results were correlated with baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. PTEN IHC showed that 108 TMA samples and 105 whole-section samples qualified for PD-L1 IHC. With a clinically relevant cutoff, 41.7% of the TMA samples were PD-L1 positive. PD-L1 level was much lower in EGFR-mutant patients and seemed to be a favorable prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). These findings were confirmed in the whole-section samples except that their survival data were not mature enough for correlation analysis. In summary, PD-L1 expression was detected in approximately 40% of PTEN-qualified Chinese NSCLC samples, negatively correlated with EGFR mutation and seemed to be a favorable prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. Notably, the different results from PTEN-qualified and PTEN-disqualified samples underscore the importance of tissue quality control prior to biomarker testing.


Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mutation , PTEN Phosphohydrolase/genetics , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Aged , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Survival Rate
15.
Hum Pathol ; 73: 144-155, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29288041

ABSTRACT

Discussion of liver antibody-mediated rejection during the 2011, 2013, and 2015 Banff liver sessions raised concerns over reliability of complement fragment 4d (C4d) staining, precipitating a global survey followed by a tissue microarray staining quality assessment study among centers on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Tissue microarray sections containing tissue plugs of resected native and allograft (with acute antibody-mediated rejection) liver, heart, and kidney (n = 33 total cores) were sent to 31 centers for C4d staining using local method(s) and pathologist scoring. Digital whole-slide images (n = 40) were then semiquantitatively scored by 7 experts for background, distribution, and intensity of portal vein and capillary, hepatic artery, sinusoidal, and central vein endothelia and portal and central stromal staining. Results showed that strong and diffuse portal vein and capillary C4d staining, as determined by both local and central pathologists, clearly distinguished allografts showing acute antibody-mediated rejection from native livers and from those with evidence of weaker donor-specific antibody. Downstream vascular endothelial cell C4d staining and assessment were more variable and difficult to identify. C4d staining in the majority of laboratories reliably detects acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Assessment should focus on portal veins and capillaries, sinusoids, and central veins present in peripheral core needle biopsies. C4d staining in one organ does not always translate to staining in another.


Subject(s)
Allografts/pathology , Complement C4b/biosynthesis , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Peptide Fragments/biosynthesis , Staining and Labeling/methods , Tissue Array Analysis/methods , Complement C4b/analysis , Formaldehyde , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Liver Transplantation , Paraffin Embedding , Peptide Fragments/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Staining and Labeling/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Tissue Fixation
16.
Virchows Arch ; 471(4): 501-508, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28497316

ABSTRACT

Ki67 is a broadly used proliferation marker in surgical pathology with an obvious need for standardization to improve reproducibility of assessment. Here, we present results of the so far only existing round robin tests on Ki67, organized annually in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland from 2010 to 2015 with up to 160 participating laboratories (QuIP). In each quality assessment trial, eight probes from each breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and malignant lymphoma were compiled on a tissue microarray (TMA). TMAs were stained in the participants' laboratories with antibodies and procedures also applied in their daily routine. Participating pathologists were expected to assign Ki67 values to one of four different categories for each tumor type. All local stainings and evaluations were reassessed by the organizing panel and compared to a preset standard. On average, 95% of participants reached the benchmark of over 80% concordance rates with the Ki67 category pre-established by the panel. Automatization and type of antibody did not affect the success rate. Concordance rates differed between tumor entities being highest in each tumor type with either very high or very low labeling indices. Lower rates were seen for intermediate Ki67 levels. Staining quality improved during the observation period as did inter-observer concordance with 85% of participants achieving excellent agreement (kappa > 0.8) in the first year and over 95% in 2015. In conclusion, regular external quality assurance trials have been established as a tool to improve the reproducibility and reliability of the prognostic and predictive proliferation marker Ki67.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
17.
Cytometry A ; 91(6): 574-584, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28141908

ABSTRACT

Immunohistochemistry Ki-67 stain is widely used for visualizing cell proliferation. The common method for scoring the proliferation is to manually select and score a hot spot. This method is time-consuming and will often not give reproducible results due to subjective selection of the hotspots and subjective scoring. An automatic hotspot detection and proliferative index scoring would be time-saving, make the determination of the Ki-67 score easier and minimize the uncertainty of the score by introducing a more objective and standardized score. Tissue Micro Array cores stained for Ki-67 and their neighbor slide stained for Pan Cytokeratin were aligned and Ki-67 positive and negative nuclei were identified inside tumor regions. A heatmap was calculated based on these and illustrates the distribution of the heterogenous response of Ki-67 positive nuclei in the tumor tissue. An automatic hot spot detection was developed and the Ki-67 score was calculated. All scores were compared with scores provided by a pathologist using linear regression models. No significant difference was found between the Ki-67 scores guided by the developed heatmap and the scores provided by a pathologist. For comparison, scores were also calculated at a random place outside the hot spot and these scores were found to be significantly different from the pathologist scores. A heatmap visualizing the heterogeneity in tumor tissue expressed by Ki-67 was developed and used for an automatic identification of hot spots in which a Ki-67 score was calculated. The Ki-67 scores did not differ significantly from scores provided by a pathologist. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cell Nucleus/ultrastructure , Epithelial Cells/ultrastructure , Keratins/genetics , Ki-67 Antigen/genetics , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/ultrastructure , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Female , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Linear Models , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
18.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 25(5): 320-328, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27801737

ABSTRACT

Manual assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GGEJ) adenocarcinomas is prone to interobserver variability and hampered by tumor heterogeneity and different scoring criteria. Equivocal cases are frequent, requiring additional in situ hybridization analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digital image analysis for the assessment of HER2 protein expression. In total, 110 GGEJ adenocarcinomas were included in tissue microarrays with 3 tissue cores per case. Two immunoassays, PATHWAY and HercepTest, and fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis were performed. The Visiopharm HER2-CONNECT Analysis Protocol Package was applied through the ONCOtopix digital image analysis software platform. HER2 membrane connectivity, calculated by the Analysis Protocol Package, was converted to standard IHC scores applying predetermined cutoff values for breast carcinoma as well as novel cutoff values. Cases with excessive cytoplasmic staining as well as HER2 amplified IHC negative cases were excluded from analysis. Applying HER2-CONNECT with connectivity cutoff values established for breast carcinoma resulted in 72.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the identification of HER2 positive gene amplified cases. By application of new cutoff values, the sensitivity increased to 100% without decreased specificity. With the new cutoff values, a 36% to 50% reduction of IHC equivocal cases was obtained. In conclusion, HER2-CONNECT with adjusted cutoff values seem to be an effective tool for standardized assessment of HER2 protein expression in GGEJ adenocarcinomas, decreasing the need for in situ hybridization analyzes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling/instrumentation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/standards , In Situ Hybridization/standards , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Tissue Array Analysis/standards
19.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 42(2): 233-44, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26942726

ABSTRACT

As heart failure, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation all bring a risk of thrombosis, anti-thrombotic therapy is recommended. Despite such treatment, major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke still occur, implying inadequate suppression of thrombus formation. Accordingly, identification of patients whose haemostasis remains unimpaired by treatment is valuable. We compared indices for assessing thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis by two different techniques in patients on different anti-thrombotic agents, i.e. aspirin or warfarin. We determined fibrin clot formation and fibrinolysis by a microplate assay and thromboelastography, and platelet marker soluble P selectin in 181 patients with acute or chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease who were taking either aspirin or warfarin. Five thromboelastograph indices and four microplate assay indices were different on aspirin versus warfarin (p < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis, only microplate assay indices rate of clot formation and rate of clot dissolution were independently related to aspirin or warfarin use (p ≤ 0.001). Five microplate assay indices, but no thrombelastograph index, were different (p < 0.001) in aspirin users. Three microplate assay indices were different (p ≤ 0.002) in warfarin users. The microplate assay indices of lag time and rate of clot formation were abnormal in chronic heart failure patients on aspirin, suggesting increased risk of thrombosis despite anti-platelet use. Soluble P selectin was lower in patients on aspirin (p = 0.0175) but failed to correlate with any other index of haemostasis. The microplate assay shows promise as a tool for dissecting thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis in cardiovascular disease, and the impact of antithrombotic therapy. Prospective studies are required to determine a role in predicting thrombotic risk.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Diseases/drug therapy , Thrombelastography/standards , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Fibrinolysis/drug effects , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Warfarin/therapeutic use
20.
Int J Parasitol ; 46(7): 447-52, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27025770

ABSTRACT

Analyses of whole organs from parasite-infected animals can reveal the entirety of the host tissue transcriptome, but conventional approaches make it difficult to dissect out the contributions of individual cellular subsets to observed gene expression. Computational deconvolution of gene expression data may be one solution to this problem. We tested this potential solution by deconvoluting whole bladder gene expression microarray data derived from a model of experimental urogenital schistosomiasis. A supervised technique was used to group B-cell and T-cell related genes based on their cell types, with a semi-supervised technique to calculate the proportions of urothelial cells. We demonstrate that the deconvolution technique was able to group genes into their correct cell types with good accuracy. A clustering-based methodology was also used to improve prediction. However, incorrectly predicted genes could not be discriminated using this methodology. The incorrect predictions were primarily IgH- and IgK-related genes. To our knowledge, this is the first application of computational deconvolution to complex, parasite-infected whole tissues. Other computational techniques such as neural networks may need to be used to improve prediction.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology/methods , Gene Expression , Schistosoma haematobium/genetics , Schistosomiasis haematobia/parasitology , Urinary Bladder/parasitology , Urothelium/parasitology , Algorithms , Animals , B-Lymphocytes/parasitology , Cluster Analysis , Immunoglobulins/genetics , Mice , T-Lymphocytes/parasitology , Tissue Array Analysis/standards , Urinary Bladder/cytology , Urothelium/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...