ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to assess a relation between demographical, clinical and tumoral features and the need for a prophylactic tracheotomy during TORS procedure in patients affected by supraglottic laryngeal cancer. METHODS: PRISMA 2020 guidelines were applied in this systematic literature review. A computerized search was performed using the Embase/Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane database, for articles published from 2007 to December 2023. A statistical univariate analysis including selected papers with low or intermediate risk of bias was performed. RESULTS: Through a study selection process 8 full texts were eligible for statistical univariate analysis. The most relevant factor related to a prophylactic tracheotomy was a contextual bilateral cervical nodes dissection, which increased the need for a tracheotomy of about 3 times. Other factors contribute with a minor impact, such as a patients age >60 years at the time of the diagnosis, a cervical lymph node metastasis and a false vocal fold involvement. Each ones increase by 20-70 % the need for a tracheotomy. However, this rate is decreased by about 60 % by the epiglottis involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic tracheotomy is considered a temporary protection strategy to achieve a valid recovery after TORS procedure. However, there are no guidelines regarding its routinely use. Only 25 % of patients undergone tracheotomy during TORS to treat supraglottic laryngeal cancer. These preliminary results may add more significant evidence regarding the use of tracheotomy during the TORS procedure, in order possibly to help the surgeon decide preoperatively whether to perform it or not.
Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Tracheotomy , Humans , Tracheotomy/methods , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Male , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Middle Aged , Female , Neck Dissection/methods , Lymphatic Metastasis , Aged , Age FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: It has been reported that non-intubated anesthesia can be used successfully in adult trachea reconstruction. Herein, our center reported a case of a child undergoing non-intubated trachea reconstruction for benign tracheal tumors. CASE DESCRIPTION: In January 2023, it was decided to attempt tracheal resection and reconstruction (TRR) in an 8-year-old child with an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor under non-intubated spontaneous breathing. After anesthesia induction, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted. Thereafter, a bilateral superficial cervical plexus block was performed with 15 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine injected into each side. The patient was induced to resume spontaneous breathing by artificially assisted ventilation with an oxygen flow of 2 to 5 L/min and FiO2=1. After tracheotomy, the oxygen flow was increased to 15 L/min to improve the local oxygen flow to maintain the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 90% under spontaneous breathing. The patient had stable spontaneous breathing after tracheal anastomosis. The anastomosis was perfect without leakage. The LMA was removed and oxygen was given by the nasal catheter under light sedation at post anesthesia care unit (PACU). CONCLUSION: Tracheal reconstruction under spontaneous breathing may be an alternative anesthesia method for upper tracheal surgery in children.
Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Trachea , Tracheal Neoplasms , Humans , Child , Tracheal Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Trachea/surgery , Male , Laryngeal Masks , Tracheotomy/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We assessed the effects of tracheostomy timing (early vs. late) on outcomes among adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant RCTs of tracheotomy timing on patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data. Outcomes in patients with early tracheostomy and late tracheostomy groups were compared and analyzed. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata14.0 and RevMan 5.4 software. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022360319). RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs were included in this Meta-analysis. The Meta-analysis indicated that early tracheotomy could significantly shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD: -2.77; 95% CI -5.10~ -0.44; P = 0.02) and the length of ICU stay (MD: -6.36; 95% CI -9.84~ -2.88; P = 0.0003), but it did not significantly alter the all-cause mortality (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.73~1.00; P = 0.06), the incidence of pneumonia (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74~1.01; P = 0.06), and length of hospital stay (MD: -3.24; 95% CI -7.99~ 1.52; P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the tracheostomy performed at an earlier stage may shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay but cannot significantly decrease the all-cause mortality and incidence of pneumonia.
Subject(s)
Length of Stay , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiration, Artificial , Tracheotomy , Humans , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , Tracheotomy/methods , Time Factors , Intensive Care Units , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheostomy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Elective tracheotomy is commonly performed in resected oral squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) to maintain airway patency. However, the indications for this procedure vary among surgeons. This nationwide study evaluated the impact of tracheotomy on both the duration of in-hospital stay and long-term survival outcomes in patients with OCSCC. METHODS: A total of 18,416 patients with OCSCC were included in the analysis, comprising 7981 patients who underwent elective tracheotomy and 10,435 who did not. The primary outcomes assessed were 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors, a propensity score (PS)-matched analysis was performed on 4301 patients from each group. The duration of hospital stay was not included as a variable in the PS-matched analysis. RESULTS: Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had significantly lower 5-year DSS and OS rates compared to those without (71% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001; 62% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariable analysis identified tracheotomy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for 5-year DSS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.03-1.18], p = 0.0063) and OS (hazard ratio = 1.10 [1.04-1.17], p = 0.0015). In the PS-matched cohort, the 5-year DSS was 75% for patients with tracheotomy and 76% for those without (p = 0.1488). Five-year OS rates were 66% and 67%, respectively (p = 0.0808). Prior to PS matching, patients with tracheotomy had a significantly longer mean hospital stay compared to those without (23.37 ± 10.56 days vs. 14.19 ± 8.34 days; p < 0.0001). Following PS matching, the difference in hospital stay duration between the two groups remained significant (22.34 ± 10.25 days vs. 17.59 ± 9.54 days; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: While elective tracheotomy in resected OCSCC patients may not significantly affect survival, it could be associated with prolonged hospital stays.
Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures , Length of Stay , Mouth Neoplasms , Tracheotomy , Humans , Tracheotomy/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cohort Studies , AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Decannulation for people in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) is challenging and relevant predictors of successful decannulation have yet to be identified. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the predictors of tracheostomy decannulation outcomes in individuals in PVS and to develop a nomogram. METHOD: In 2022, 872 people with tracheostomy in PVS were retrospectively enrolled and their data was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed on the training set to explore the influencing factors for decannulation and nomogram development. Internal validation was performed using 5-fold cross-validation. External validation was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) on both the training and validation sets. RESULT: Data from 610 to 262 individuals were used for the training and validation sets, respectively. The multivariate regression analysis found that duration of tracheostomy tube placement≥30 days (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.216, 95â¯% CI 0.151-0.310), pulmonary infection (OR 0.528, 95â¯%CI 0.366-0.761), hypoproteinemia (OR 0.669, 95â¯% CI 0.463-0.967), no passive standing training (OR 0.372, 95â¯% CI 0.253-0.547), abnormal swallowing reflex (OR 0.276, 95â¯% CI 0.116-0.656), mechanical ventilation (OR 0.658, 95â¯% CI 0.461-0.940), intensive care unit (ICU) duration>4 weeks (OR 0.517, 95â¯% CI 0.332-0.805), duration of endotracheal tube (OR 0.855, 95â¯% CI 0.803-0.907), older age (OR 0.981, 95â¯% CI 0.966-0.996) were risk factors for decannulation failure. Conversely, peroral feeding (OR 1.684, 95â¯% CI 1.178-2.406), passive standing training≥60â¯min (OR 1.687, 95â¯% CI 1.072-2.656), private caregiver (OR 1.944, 95â¯% CI 1.350-2.799) and ICU duration<2 weeks (OR 1.758, 95â¯% CI 1.173-2.634) were protective factors conducive to successful decannulation. The 5-fold cross-validation revealed a mean area under the curve of 0.744. The ROC curve C-indexes for the training and validation sets were 0.784 and 0.768, respectively, and the model exhibited good stability and accuracy. The DCA revealed a net benefit when the risk threshold was between 0 and 0.4. CONCLUSION: The nomogram can help adjust the treatment and reduce decannulation failure. REGISTRATION: Clinical registration is not mandatory for retrospective studies.
Subject(s)
Nomograms , Persistent Vegetative State , Tracheostomy , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Persistent Vegetative State/etiology , Middle Aged , Tracheostomy/methods , Tracheotomy/methods , ROC Curve , Device Removal , Young Adult , AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), it is unable to determine early which patients require tracheotomy and whether early tracheotomy is beneficial. METHODS: Clinical data of patients who were first admitted to the ICU and underwent invasive ventilation for more than 24 h in the Medical Information Marketplace in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized into successful extubation and tracheotomy groups according to whether they were subsequently successfully extubated or underwent tracheotomy. The patients were randomly divided into model training set and validation set in a ratio of 7:3. Constructing predictive models and evaluating and validating the models. The tracheotomized patients were divided into the early tracheotomy group (< = 7 days) and the late tracheotomy group (> 7 days), and the prognosis of the two groups was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 7 key variables were screened: Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, pneumonia, traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, left and right pupil responses to light, and parenteral nutrition. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of the prediction model constructed through these seven variables was 0.897 (95% CI: 0.876-0.919), and 0.896 (95% CI: 0.866-0.926) for the training and validation sets, respectively. Patients in the early tracheotomy group had a shorter length of hospital stay, IMV duration, and sedation duration compared to the late tracheotomy group (p < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The prediction model constructed and validated based on the MIMIC-IV database can accurately predict the outcome of tracheotomy in critically ill patients. Meanwhile, early tracheotomy in critically ill patients does not improve survival outcomes but has potential advantages in shortening the duration of hospitalization, IMV, and sedation.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Respiration, Artificial , Tracheotomy , Humans , Tracheotomy/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Time Factors , Intensive Care Units , Glasgow Coma Scale , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC CurveABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This case series study investigated the outcomes of an innovative approach, ansa cervicalis nerve (ACN)-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) low-tension anastomosis. METHODS: Patients who received laryngeal nerve anastomosis between May 2015 and September 2021 at the facility were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were patients with RLN dissection and anastomosis immediately during thyroid surgery. Exclusion criteria were cases with anastomosis other than cervical loop-RLN anastomosis or pronunciation recovery time > 6 months. Patients admitted before January 2020 were assigned to group A which underwent the conventional tension-free anastomosis, and patients admitted after January 2020 were group B and underwent the innovative low-tension anastomosis (Dong's method). RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were included, 11 patients received unilateral surgery, and 2 underwent bilateral surgery. For patients who underwent unilateral anastomosis, group B had a significantly higher percentage of normal pronunciation via GRBAS scale (83.3 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.015) and voice handicap index (66.7 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.002), and shorter recovery time in pronunciation (median: 1-day vs. 4 months, p = 0.001) than those in group A after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: ACNs-to-RLN low-tension anastomosis with a laryngeal segment ≤1 cm (Dong's method) significantly improves postoperative pronunciation and recovery time. The results provide clinicians with a new strategy for ACN -to-RLN anastomosis during thyroid surgery.
Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Phonation , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve , Thyroidectomy , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/surgery , Thyroidectomy/methods , Phonation/physiology , Adult , Recovery of Function , Tracheotomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Aged , Cervical Plexus/surgery , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/prevention & control , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning in intubated or tracheotomized critically ill patients is a daily task of various professional groups in intensive and emergency medicine; however, a German language summary of current evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to develop a narrative overview of current evidence on endotracheal suctioning of intubated or tracheotomized patients in the clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the databases Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Livivo, and Medline via PubMed by nurses with an academic degree. In addition, a hand search and applying the snowball principle were performed. Following a successful critical appraisal, all English and German language publications addressing endotracheal suctioning in the context of hospital care were included. RESULTS: A total of 23 full texts were included. After developing 6 main topics on endotracheal suction 19 articles were considered in the reporting. The results showed, among others, that routine deep suctioning once per shift is contraindicated and that the catheter should be advanced no more than 0.5-1â¯cm beyond the distal end of the tube or tracheal cannula. Closed suction catheters offer advantages, especially for staff protection, although studies are heterogeneous. Further training of staff is obligatory. CONCLUSION: Few conclusive studies on endotracheal suction could be found; however, with the available evidence initial conclusions can be drawn which should be considered in, for example, internal standard operating procedures. Further research is needed.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Tracheotomy , Suction , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Humans , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , Tracheotomy/methodsSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Tracheostomy , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Tracheostomy/methods , Tracheotomy/methods , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine whether tracheostomy stomal maturation affects the risk of tracheocutaneous fistula (TCF) in children. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all children who both underwent a tracheostomy and were decannulated between 2012 and 2021 at a tertiary children's hospital. Charts were analyzed for demographics, surgical technique, and development of a TCF. TCF was defined as a persistent fistula following 3 months after decannulation. RESULTS: 179 children met inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile range) age at tracheostomy was 1.5 (82.4) months, average (standard deviation [SD]) duration of tracheotomy was 20.0 (20.6) months, and length of follow-up after decannulation (range; SD) was 39.3 (4.4-110.0; 26.7) months. 107 patients (60.0%) underwent stomal maturation and 98 patients developed a TCF (54.7%). Younger age at tracheostomy placement was significantly associated with increased risk of TCF, mean (SD) age 28.4 (51.4) version 80.1 (77.5) months (p < 0.001). Increased duration of tracheostomy was significantly associated with increased risk of TCF, 27.5 (18.4) version 11.0 (18.2) months (p < 0.001). Stomal maturation was not significantly associated with the risk of TCF, including on multivariable analysis adjusting for age at tracheostomy and duration of tracheostomy (p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: Tracheostomy stomal maturation did not affect the risk of TCF in children, even after adjusting for age and duration of tracheostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2941-2944, 2024.
Subject(s)
Cutaneous Fistula , Tracheal Diseases , Tracheostomy , Tracheotomy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Cutaneous Fistula/surgery , Cutaneous Fistula/etiology , Tracheal Diseases/surgery , Tracheal Diseases/etiology , Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Tracheotomy/methods , Tracheotomy/adverse effects , Child , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Risk Factors , Surgical Stomas/adverse effectsABSTRACT
This article aims to review the current anaesthetic management of tracheal resections.Apart from the "traditional" approach of induction of general anaesthesia with conventional tracheal intubation and cross-field intubation or jet ventilation during the resection phase, there has lately been a trend towards less invasive techniques.Regional anaesthesia, laryngeal mask airways and preservation of spontaneous ventilation are among the new anaesthetic approaches. Current data suggest potential advantages compared with conventional tracheal intubation.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may provide adequate gas exchange and/or cardiovascular support for complex resections and reconstructions. In addition, it may serve as a reliable "backup" technique, in case of oxygenation difficulties with the use of other devices.Given the vast spectrum of different anaesthetic approaches to tracheal surgery, interdisciplinary planning is essential to identify the optimal technique on a case-by-case basis. During that process, the localisation and consistency of the airway lesion, comorbidities and the functional status of the respiratory system and specific surgical approach need to be taken into account.As there is a lack of high-quality data, evidence-based comparisons of different anaesthetic techniques are not possible.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Trachea/surgery , Anesthesia, General/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Laryngeal Masks , Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Tracheotomy/methodsABSTRACT
Percutaneous tracheotomies (PCT) are commonly performed minimally invasive procedures involving the creation of an airway opening through an incision or puncture of the tracheal wall. While the medical intervention is crucial for critical care and the management of acute respiratory failure, tracheostomy complications can lead to severe clinical symptoms due to the alterations of the airways biomechanical properties/structures. The causes and mechanisms underlaying the development of these post-tracheotomy complications remain largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the needle puncture process and its biomechanical characteristics by using a well establish porcine ex vivo trachea to simulate the forces involved in accessing airways during PCT at varying angular approaches. Given that many procedures involve inserting a needle into the trachea without direct visualization of the tracheal wall, concerns have been raised over the needle punctures through the cartilaginous rings as compared to the space between them may result in fractured cartilage and post-tracheostomy airway complications. We report a difference in puncture force between piercing the cartilage and the annular ligaments and observe that the angle of puncture does not significantly alter the puncture forces. The data collected in this study can guide the design of relevant biomechanical feedback system during airway access procedures and ultimately help refine and optimize PCT.
Subject(s)
Trachea , Tracheostomy , Animals , Swine , Tracheostomy/methods , Tracheotomy/methods , Punctures , CartilageABSTRACT
La manga traqueal cartilaginosa es una malformación de la vía aérea donde no se distinguen anillos traqueales. Un segmento continuo de cartílago se extiende desde el cricoides, pudiendo llegar hasta los bronquios principales. Está asociada a síndromes de craneosinostosis con la mutación FGFR2, además de muertes prematuras por oclusión de la tráquea con tapones mucosos. Se presenta el curso clínico de pacientes portadores de manga traqueal cartilaginosa en el contexto de una malformación craneofacial. Caso 1. Masculino, al nacer hipoplasia del tercio medio facial. Polisomnografía: índice de apnea/hipopnea de 37,7/hr. Laringotraqueobroncoscopía (LTBC): tráquea sin anillos cartilaginosos desde cricoides hasta bronquios fuentes. Se indica traqueostomía. Caso 2. Masculino, al nacer cráneo en trébol. Poligrafía: Síndrome de apnea/hipopnea obstructiva del sueño (SAHOS) leve. Revisión vía aérea: desde subglotis hasta bronquios principales se extiende tráquea en manga. Se indica traqueostomía. En el contexto de una craneosinostosis en niños, especialmente con mutación FGFR2, creemos necesario realizar una LTBC en búsqueda de manga traqueal, ya que si es diagnosticada se debe recomendar traqueostomía, mejorando su expectativa de vida. Si la indicación de traqueostomía fuese por SAHOS, es obligatoria una LTBC preoperatoria, para evitar el no tener referencias anatómicas en el proceso.
A tracheal cartilaginous sleeve is a malformation of the airway in which the tracheal rings are indistinguishable. A continuous segment of cartilage extends from the cricoid, and it may reach all the way to the main bronchi. It is associated with various craniosynostosis syndromes with the FGFR2 mutation, in addition to premature deaths due to occlusions caused by mucus plugs in the trachea. Here we present the clinical course of patients who suffer from Tracheal Cartilaginous Sleeve in the context of a craniofacial malformation. First case. Male, presenting at birth a midfacial hypoplasia. Polysomnography: presents a 37,7/h index of apnea/hypopnea. Laryngotracheobronchoscopy (LTB): trachea is without cartilaginous rings from the cricoid to the main bronchi. A tracheostomy is indicated. Second case. Male, cloverleaf skull at birth. Polysomnography: Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome (OSAHS) non-severe degree. Revision of the airway: the trachea in sleeve extends from the subglottis to the main bronchi. A tracheostomy is indicated. In the context of craniosynostosis in children, especially with FGFR2 mutation, we believe it is necessary to do an LTB in the search of a tracheal sleeve, since if it is diagnosed a tracheostomy must be indicated, to better the life expectancy of the patient. If the tracheostomy indication comes from an OSAHS, a preoperatory LTB is obligatory to avoid not having anatomical references during the procedure.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Infant, Newborn , Trachea/abnormalities , Cartilage/abnormalities , Trachea/surgery , Trachea/pathology , Tracheotomy/methods , Cartilage/pathologyABSTRACT
La traqueotomía percutánea por dilatación es un procedimiento que se realiza en las unidades de paciente crítico, implica la disección roma de los tejidos pretraqueales, seguida de la dilatación de la tráquea sobre la guía y la inserción de la cánula traqueal mediante la técnica de Seldinger. En las últimas décadas, la evidencia sugiere que, en manos de médicos capacitados, es al menos tan segura como la traqueotomía quirúrgica, con similar incidencia de complicaciones. La selección adecuada de pacientes y el uso de herramientas de seguridad complementarias, como broncoscopio o ultrasonido, disminuyen las tasas de falla y complicaciones. Siendo contraindicaciones absolutas para traqueotomía percutánea por dilatación una anatomía anormal, tumor maligno en el sitio de traqueostomía, coagulopatías o vía aérea difícil. La guía mediante broncoscopia permite la evaluación de la profundidad del tubo endotraqueal, confirma la posición de la aguja en el eje de la tráquea y la adecuada inserción del cable guía y dilatador. Entre sus desventajas destacan que, el sitio de punción está sujeto a sesgo y no puede guiar con precisión la aguja en la penetración de la tráquea. La traqueotomía percutánea guiada por ultrasonido es una alternativa validada en unidades, donde no se cuente con broncoscopia. Es un método rápido, seguro, que permite la identificación de estructuras anatómicas, vasculatura cervical, permite identificar el sitio de la punción y guía la inserción de la aguja en la tráquea. Esta técnica presenta altas tasas de éxito al primer intento, reduciendo significativamente el número de punciones.
Percutaneous dilation tracheostomy is a procedure performed in critical patient units. It involves blunt dissection of the pretracheal tissues followed by dilation of the trachea over the guidewire and insertion of the tracheal cannula using the Seldinger technique. In recent decades, evidence suggests that in the hands of trained physicians it is at least as safe as surgical tracheostomy, with a similar incidence of complications. The proper selection of patients and the use of complementary safety tools such as bronchoscope or ultrasound reduce failure rates and complications. Being absolute contraindications for PDT abnormal anatomy, malignant tumor at the tracheostomy site, coagulopathies, or difficult to treat airway. Bronchoscopy guidance allows evaluation of the depth of the endotracheal tube, confirms the position of the needle in the axis of the trachea and the proper insertion of the guide wire and dilator. Among its disadvantages are that the puncture site is subject to slant and cannot accurately guide the needle into the trachea. In addition, it requires Critical Patient Units with bronchoscope and trained personnel. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheotomy is a validated alternative in units where bronchoscopy is not available. It is a fast, safe method that allows the identification of anatomical structures, cervical vasculature, identifies the puncture site and guides the insertion of the needle into the trachea. With high first-attempt success rates, significantly reducing the number of punctures.
Subject(s)
Humans , Tracheotomy/methods , Dilatation/methods , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color/methodsABSTRACT
La obesidad es un problema de salud que ha presentado un aumento preocupante en Chile y el mundo, en las últimas décadas. Esta condición se asocia a múltiples comorbi-lidades, entre ellas, afecciones respiratorias. La traqueostomía es un procedimiento quirúrgico que puede resultar desafiante en este tipo de pacientes, debido a las alteraciones que la obesidad genera en la anatomía cervical, asociándose a mayor morbimortalidad. Requiere una buena planificación preoperatoria. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con antecedente de súper-súper obesidad, con un índice de masa corporal de 78 kg m2, que requirió la realización de una traqueostomía quirúrgica. Se describe el manejo realizado, junto a las consideraciones especiales aplicadas al caso: se realizó lipectomía cervical, se utilizó instrumental quirúrgico de mayor longitud, suturas al plano subcutáneo para facilitar visualización intraoperatoria, suturas de la piel a la tráquea previo a la apertura de la vía aérea, uso de cánula de traqueostomía extra larga. El paciente presentó como complicación postoperatoria un granuloma periostomal que fue tratado y, finalmente, fue decanulado previo su alta hospitalaria. Se presenta una revisión en la literatura pertinente al caso.
Obesity is a health problem that has shown a worrisome increase in Chile and the world in recent decades. This condition is associated to multiple comorbidities, including respiratory disorders. A tracheostomy is a surgical procedure that can be challenging in this type of patient due to the variations that obesity generates in the cervical anatomy, which is associated to greater morbidity and mortality. Due to this, it requires good preoperative planning. We present the case of a male patient with a history of super-super obesity, with a body mass index (BMI) of 78 kg m2, who required surgical tracheostomy; the management is described with the special considerations applied to the case: cervical lipectomy was performed, longer surgical instruments were used, sutures to the subcutaneous plane were placed to facilitate intraoperative visualization, skin sutures to the trachea were placed prior to opening the airway, use of extra-large tracheostomy cannula (XL). The patient presented a peristomal granuloma as a postoperative complication which was treated, and he was decannulated prior to hospital discharge. A review of the literature relevant to the case is presented.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Tracheotomy/methods , Obesity, Morbid , Postoperative Complications , Tracheotomy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/surgery , Tracheotomy/methods , Lingual Thyroid/pathology , Tongue Neoplasms/pathology , Lingual Thyroid/surgery , Tongue/diagnostic imaging , Tongue/pathology , Laryngoscopy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Thyroxine/therapeutic use , Tongue Neoplasms/diagnosisABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Tracheotomy/standards , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Tracheotomy/instrumentation , Tracheotomy/methods , Respiration, Artificial , Intensive Care Units , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Aerosols/therapeutic use , Administration, InhalationABSTRACT
La alta incidencia de insuficiencia respiratoria aguda en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 ha conllevado el uso de ventilación mecánica hasta en un 15%. Dado que la traqueotomía es un procedimiento quirúrgico frecuente, este documento de consenso, elaborado por tres Sociedades Científicas, la SEMICYUC, la SEDAR y la SEORL-CCC, tiene como objetivo ofrecer una revisión de las indicaciones y contraindicaciones de traqueotomía, ya sea por punción o abierta, esclarecer las posibles ventajas y exponer las condiciones ideales en que deben realizarse y los pasos que considerar en su ejecución. Se abordan situaciones regladas y urgentes, así como los cuidados posoperatorios
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure,the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Tracheotomy/methods , Tracheotomy/standards , Coronavirus Infections/surgery , Pneumonia, Viral/surgery , Betacoronavirus , Pandemics , Respiratory Insufficiency/surgery , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , Respiration, Artificial/methodsABSTRACT
La alta incidencia de insuficiencia respiratoria aguda en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 ha conllevado el uso de ventilación mecánica hasta en un 15%. Dado que la traqueotomía es un procedimiento quirúrgico frecuente, este documento de consenso, elaborado por 3 Sociedades Científicas, la SEMICYUC, la SEDAR y la SEORL-CCC, tiene como objetivo ofrecer una revisión de las indicaciones y contraindicaciones de traqueotomía, ya sea por punción o abierta, esclarecer las posibles ventajas y exponer las condiciones ideales en que deben realizarse, y los pasos que considerar en su ejecución. Se abordan situaciones regladas y urgentes, así como los cuidados postoperatorios
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure, the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regular and emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures
Subject(s)
Humans , Tracheotomy/methods , Coronavirus Infections/surgery , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/surgery , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/pathogenicity , Respiratory Insufficiency/surgery , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Airway Management/methodsABSTRACT
La alta incidencia de insuficiencia respiratoria aguda en el contexto de la pandemia por COVID-19 ha conllevado el uso de ventilación mecánica hasta en un 15%. Dado que la traqueotomía es un procedimiento quirúrgico frecuente, este documento de consenso, elaborado por tres Sociedades Científicas, la SEMICYUC, la SEDAR y la SEORL-CCC, tiene como objetivo ofrecer una revisión de las indicaciones y contraindicaciones de traqueotomía, ya sea por punción o abierta, esclarecer las posibles ventajas y exponer las condiciones ideales en que deben realizarse y los pasos que considerar en su ejecución. Se abordan situaciones regladas y urgentes, así como los cuidados posoperatorios
The current COVID-19 pandemic has rendered up to 15% of patients under mechanical ventilation. Because the subsequent tracheotomy is a frequent procedure,the three societies mostly involved (SEMICYUC, SEDAR and SEORL-CCC) have setup a consensus paper that offers an overview about indications and contraindications of tracheotomy, be it by puncture or open, clarifying its respective advantages and enumerating the ideal conditions under which they should be performed, as well as the necessary steps. Regularand emergency situations are displayed together with the postoperative measures