A Correlation between Upper Extremity Compressive Neuropathy and Nerve Compression Headache.

BACKGROUND: Compressive neuropathies of the head/neck that trigger headaches and entrapment neuropathies of the extremities have traditionally been perceived as separate clinical entities. Given significant overlap in clinical presentation, treatment, and anatomical abnormality, the authors aimed to elucidate the relationship between nerve compression headaches and carpal tunnel syndrome, and other upper extremity compression neuropathies. METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven patients with nerve compression headaches who underwent surgical nerve deactivation were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted and the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome, thoracic outlet syndrome, and cubital tunnel syndrome was recorded. Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, and thoracic outlet syndrome who had a history of surgery and/or positive imaging findings in addition to confirmed diagnosis were included. Patients with subjective report of carpal tunnel syndrome/thoracic outlet syndrome/cubital tunnel syndrome were excluded. Prevalence was compared to general population data. RESULTS: The cumulative prevalence of upper extremity neuropathies in patients undergoing surgery for nerve compression headaches was 16.7 percent. The prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome was 10.2 percent, which is 1.8- to 3.8-fold more common than in the general population. Thoracic outlet syndrome prevalence was 3.6 percent, with no available general population data for comparison. Cubital tunnel syndrome prevalence was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of overlap between nerve compression syndromes of the head/neck and upper extremity suggests that peripheral nerve surgeons should be aware of this correlation and screen affected patients comprehensively. Similar patient presentation, treatment, and anatomical basis of nerve compression make either amenable to treatment by nerve surgeons, and treatment of both entities should be an integral part of a formal peripheral nerve surgery curriculum.

Clinical Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Diagnosis of Migraine Trigger Points.

BACKGROUND: With a 13 percent global prevalence, migraine headaches are the most commonly diagnosed neurologic disorder, and are a top five cause of visits to the emergency room. Surgical techniques, such as decompression and/or ablation of neurovasculature, have shown to provide relief. Popular diagnostic modalities to identify trigger loci include handheld Doppler examinations and botulinum toxin injection. This article aims to establish the positive predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks for identifying therapeutic surgical targets for migraine headache surgery. METHODS: Electronic medical records of 36 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent peripheral nerve blocks using 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and subsequent surgery on identified migraine headache trigger sites. Patients were grouped into successful and unsuccessful blocks and further categorized into successful and unsuccessful surgery subgroups. Group analysis was performed using paired t tests, and positive-predictive value calculations were performed on subgroups. RESULTS: The preoperative Migraine Headache Index of patients with positive blocks was 152.71, versus 34.26 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Each index component also decreased significantly: frequency (22.11 versus 15.06 migraine headaches per month; p < 0.001), intensity (7.43 versus 4.12; p < 0.001), and duration (0.93 versus 0.55 days; p < 0.001). The positive-predictive value of diagnostic peripheral nerve blocks in identifying a migraine headache trigger site responsive to surgical intervention was calculated to be 0.89 (95 percent CI, 1 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the positive-predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks as used in the diagnostic workup of patients with chronic migraine headaches. Peripheral nerve blocks serve as a reliable clinical tool in mapping migraine trigger sites for surgical intervention while offering more flexibility in their administration and recording as compared to established diagnostic methods. . CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.

Trigger-Site Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify patients who are candidates for headache surgery. 2. Counsel the patient preoperatively with regard to success rates, recovery, and complications. 3. Develop a surgical plan for primary and secondary nerve decompression. 4. Understand the surgical anatomy at all trigger sites. 5. Select appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes. SUMMARY: Headache surgery encompasses release of extracranial peripheral sensory nerves at seven sites. Keys to successful surgery include correct patient selection, detailed patient counseling, and meticulous surgical technique. This article is a practical step-by-step guide, from preoperative assessment to surgery and postoperative recovery. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes, in addition to complications and salvage procedures, are discussed. Intraoperative photographs, videos, and screening questionnaires are provided.

Dry Needling and Photobiomodulation Decreases Myofascial Pain in Trapezius of Women: Randomized Blind Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether dry needling (DN) added to photobiomodulation (PBM) has effects on the treatment of active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius. METHODS: This study was a randomized clinical trial, with 43 participants divided into 3 groups: DN and PBM (DNP), DN, and DN outside of the trigger point (DNout). Each group received 1 session of DN followed by PBM therapy with the machine turned on or off. Pain, disability, pain pressure threshold, and muscle activity were assessed before the intervention and afterward at intervals of 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month. RESULTS: Pain decreased after intervention in the DNP and DNout groups, with mean differences, respectively, of 1.33 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.019-2.647) and 2.78 cm (95% CI, 1.170-2.973). Scores for the disability questionnaire decreased in all groups after intervention (F = 36.53, P < .0001) after the intervention, with mean differences of 3.8 points in the DNP group (95% CI, 1.082-5.518), 3.57 in the DN group (95% CI, 0.994-6.149), and 5.43 in the DNout group (95% CI, 3.101-7.756). There were no significant differences between or within groups in pain pressure threshold (F = 2.14, P = .139), with mean differences after 30 minutes of 0.139 kgf for the DNP group (95% CI, -0.343 to 0.622), 0.273 for the DN group (95% CI, -0.661 to 1.209), and -0.07 for the DNout group (95% CI, -0.465 to 0.324). Muscle activation for the DN group increased 8.49% after the intervention, where for the DNP group it decreased 11.5%, with a significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: DN added to PBM presented similar results compared to DNout and DN. In this sample, the effects of the application of DN outside of the trigger point had better effects on pain and disability scores than DN applied directly on the trigger point.

Comparison of intravenous NSAIDs and trigger point injection for low back pain in ED: A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint originating from muscles Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is mainly associated with trigger points (TrP) in the muscle tissue. We compared the intravenously administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and trigger point injection (TPI) in the treatment of LBP patients admitted to the emergency department due to pain caused by TrPs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: After randomization, NSAID was administered intravenously in group 1 and TPIs were performed as specified by Travell and Simons in group 2. The TrPs were identified with the anamnesis and physical examination Demographic characteristics and vital signs of the patients were recorded. Pain scores were measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at admission; and in minutes 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60. RESULTS: There were 32 patients in group 1 and 22 patients in group 2. The demographics, vital signs, and pain scores at admission were not statistically significantly different between the groups. The pain scores decreased significantly in the TPI group. During the 60 min' follow-up period, the mean VAS pain score decreased by 0.41 ±â€¯1.30 in the TPI group and by 2.59 ±â€¯2.37 in the NSAID group (p < 0.001). Respond the treatment was significantly higher group TPI than Group NSAID (21/22 vs 20/32 respectively, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In this small randomized study with several methodological limitations, TPI was superior to the intravenous NSAIDs in the treatment of acute LBP due to TrPs. TPI can be used in the emergency departments for the acute treatment of LBP in selected patients.

Anatomical Basis of the Myofascial Trigger Points of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle.

Myofascial pain syndrome is characterized by pain and limited range of motion in joints and caused by muscular contracture related to dysfunctional motor end plates and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). We aimed to observe the anatomical correlation between the clinically described MTrPs and the entry point of the branches of the inferior gluteal nerve into the gluteus maximus muscle. We dissected twenty gluteus maximus muscles from 10 human adult cadavers (5 males and 5 females). We measured the muscles and compiled the distribution of the nerve branches into each of the quadrants of the muscle. Statistical analysis was performed by using Student's t-test and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Although no difference was observed either for muscle measurements or for distribution of nerve branching among the subjects, the topography of MTrPs matched the anatomical location of the entry points into the muscle. Thus, anatomical substract of the MTrPs may be useful for a better understanding of the physiopathology of these disorders and provide basis for their surgical and clinical treatment.

Myofascial Head Pain.

Muscle nociception is mainly characterized by local tenderness and referred pain. The neurophysiological basis of muscle pain supports a role of sensitization mechanisms. From a clinical viewpoint, muscle pain is represented by the presence of myofascial trigger points (TrPs). Evidence suggests that TrPs are able to start a peripheral nociceptive mechanism and hence contributing to changes in the central nervous system. Several studies demonstrated that the referred pain elicited by TrPs reproduces the headache pattern in patients with tension-type headache (TTH), migraine, cervicogenic headache and, in some individuals, with cluster headache. In fact, sensitization of nociceptive pain pathways in the central nervous system due to prolonged nociceptive stimuli from TrPs seems to be responsible for the conversion of episodic to chronic TTH. In other headaches, TrPs may be able to stimulate the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and hence triggering a migraine or cluster headache attack. Proper treatment directed towards TrP inactivation has documented positive effects in individuals with these headaches; however, longitudinal studies are needed to further determine the role of TrPs in head pain.