The Great Auricular Nerve Trigger Site: Anatomy, Compression Point Topography, and Treatment Options for Headache Pain.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve decompression surgery can effectively address headache pain caused by compression of peripheral nerves of the head and neck. Despite decompression of known trigger sites, there are a subset of patients with trigger sites centered over the postauricular area coursing. The authors hypothesize that these patients experience primary or residual pain caused by compression of the great auricular nerve. METHODS: Anatomical dissections were carried out on 16 formalin-fixed cadaveric heads. Possible points of compression along fascia, muscle, and parotid gland were identified. Ultrasound technology was used to confirm these anatomical findings in a living volunteer. RESULTS: The authors' findings demonstrate that the possible points of compression for the great auricular nerve are at Erb's point (point 1), at the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in the dense connective tissue before entry into the parotid gland (point 2), and within its intraparotid course (point 3). The mean topographic measurements were as follows: Erb's point to the mastoid process at 7.32 cm/7.35 (right/left), Erb's point to the angle of the mandible at 6.04 cm/5.89 cm (right/left), and the posterior aspect of the sternocleidomastoid muscle to the mastoid process at 3.88 cm/4.43 cm (right/left). All three possible points of compression could be identified using ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified three possible points of compression of the great auricular nerve that could be decompressed with peripheral nerve decompression surgery: Erb's point (point 1), at the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (point 2), and within its intraparotid course (point 3).

A Correlation between Upper Extremity Compressive Neuropathy and Nerve Compression Headache.

BACKGROUND: Compressive neuropathies of the head/neck that trigger headaches and entrapment neuropathies of the extremities have traditionally been perceived as separate clinical entities. Given significant overlap in clinical presentation, treatment, and anatomical abnormality, the authors aimed to elucidate the relationship between nerve compression headaches and carpal tunnel syndrome, and other upper extremity compression neuropathies. METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven patients with nerve compression headaches who underwent surgical nerve deactivation were included. A retrospective chart review was conducted and the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome, thoracic outlet syndrome, and cubital tunnel syndrome was recorded. Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, and thoracic outlet syndrome who had a history of surgery and/or positive imaging findings in addition to confirmed diagnosis were included. Patients with subjective report of carpal tunnel syndrome/thoracic outlet syndrome/cubital tunnel syndrome were excluded. Prevalence was compared to general population data. RESULTS: The cumulative prevalence of upper extremity neuropathies in patients undergoing surgery for nerve compression headaches was 16.7 percent. The prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome was 10.2 percent, which is 1.8- to 3.8-fold more common than in the general population. Thoracic outlet syndrome prevalence was 3.6 percent, with no available general population data for comparison. Cubital tunnel syndrome prevalence was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of overlap between nerve compression syndromes of the head/neck and upper extremity suggests that peripheral nerve surgeons should be aware of this correlation and screen affected patients comprehensively. Similar patient presentation, treatment, and anatomical basis of nerve compression make either amenable to treatment by nerve surgeons, and treatment of both entities should be an integral part of a formal peripheral nerve surgery curriculum.

Clinical Effectiveness of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Diagnosis of Migraine Trigger Points.

BACKGROUND: With a 13 percent global prevalence, migraine headaches are the most commonly diagnosed neurologic disorder, and are a top five cause of visits to the emergency room. Surgical techniques, such as decompression and/or ablation of neurovasculature, have shown to provide relief. Popular diagnostic modalities to identify trigger loci include handheld Doppler examinations and botulinum toxin injection. This article aims to establish the positive predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks for identifying therapeutic surgical targets for migraine headache surgery. METHODS: Electronic medical records of 36 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Patients underwent peripheral nerve blocks using 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and subsequent surgery on identified migraine headache trigger sites. Patients were grouped into successful and unsuccessful blocks and further categorized into successful and unsuccessful surgery subgroups. Group analysis was performed using paired t tests, and positive-predictive value calculations were performed on subgroups. RESULTS: The preoperative Migraine Headache Index of patients with positive blocks was 152.71, versus 34.26 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Each index component also decreased significantly: frequency (22.11 versus 15.06 migraine headaches per month; p < 0.001), intensity (7.43 versus 4.12; p < 0.001), and duration (0.93 versus 0.55 days; p < 0.001). The positive-predictive value of diagnostic peripheral nerve blocks in identifying a migraine headache trigger site responsive to surgical intervention was calculated to be 0.89 (95 percent CI, 1 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the positive-predictive value of peripheral nerve blocks as used in the diagnostic workup of patients with chronic migraine headaches. Peripheral nerve blocks serve as a reliable clinical tool in mapping migraine trigger sites for surgical intervention while offering more flexibility in their administration and recording as compared to established diagnostic methods. . CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.

The Relationship of Psychiatric Comorbidities and Their Impact on Trigger Site Deactivation Surgery for Headaches.

BACKGROUND: Patients seeking trigger site deactivation surgery for headaches often have debilitating symptoms that can affect their functional and mental health. Although prior studies have shown a strong correlation between psychiatric variables and chronic headaches, their associations in patients undergoing surgery have not been fully elucidated. This study aims to analyze psychiatric comorbidities and their impact on patients undergoing trigger site deactivation surgery for headaches. METHODS: One hundred forty-two patients were prospectively enrolled. Patients were asked to complete the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and Migraine Headache Index surveys preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. Data on psychiatric comorbidities were collected by means of both survey and retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 38 percent of patients self-reported a diagnosis of depression, and 45 percent of patients met Patient Health Questionnaire-2 criteria for likely major depressive disorder (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score of ≥3). Twenty-seven percent of patients reported a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. Patients with depression and anxiety reported more severe headache symptoms at baseline. At 1 year postoperatively, patients with these conditions had successful surgical outcomes comparable to those of patients without these conditions. Patients also reported a significant decrease in their Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score, with 22 percent of patients meeting criteria suggestive of depression, compared to 45 percent preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients undergoing trigger site deactivation surgery. Patients with these comorbid conditions achieve successful surgical outcomes comparable to those of the general surgical headache population. Furthermore, trigger site deactivation surgery is associated with a significant decrease in depressive symptoms.

Trigger areas nerve decompression for refractory chronic migraine.

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine refractory to medical treatment represents a common debilitating primary neurovascular disorder associated with great disability, high financial costs, reduced rates of productivity and impaired health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of scalp (trigger areas) nerve decompression as a treatment alternative in the management of refractory CM patients METHODS: From January 2005 to January 2020, we retrospectively collected data of 154 patients diagnosed with chronic migraine that underwent trigger site nerve decompression. These trigger areas were divided according the nerve compromise as frontal (supraorbital nerve), temporal (auriculotemporal nerve), occipital (greater occipital nerve). Following extensive clinical evaluation, the surgical treatment was performed after under local anesthesia and required the release of the affected nerve from surrounding connective tissue adhesions, and vascular conflicts. RESULTS: Of the total amount of patients, 91 (59.09%) patients underwent auriculotemporal nerve decompression, 27 (13.63%) cases supraorbital nerve decompression, 15 (9.74%) patients greater occipital nerve decompression, and the remaining 21 (13.63%) patients had more than one procedure of nerve decompression. At 1-year follow or latest follow-up, 96 (62.2%) patients were considered as cured, 29 cases (18.83%) reported improvement of their symptoms, 21 (13.64%) patients considered only a partial symptomatic remission and 5 (3.25%) patients reported no change or failed surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Nerve decompression of trigger site areas (frontal, temporal, occipital) by removal of tissue, muscles and vessels in patients with medically refractory CM is a feasible alternative treatment modality with a high success of up to 80.5.

Trigger-Site Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify patients who are candidates for headache surgery. 2. Counsel the patient preoperatively with regard to success rates, recovery, and complications. 3. Develop a surgical plan for primary and secondary nerve decompression. 4. Understand the surgical anatomy at all trigger sites. 5. Select appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes. SUMMARY: Headache surgery encompasses release of extracranial peripheral sensory nerves at seven sites. Keys to successful surgery include correct patient selection, detailed patient counseling, and meticulous surgical technique. This article is a practical step-by-step guide, from preoperative assessment to surgery and postoperative recovery. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes, in addition to complications and salvage procedures, are discussed. Intraoperative photographs, videos, and screening questionnaires are provided.

Patient Pain Sketches Can Predict Surgical Outcomes in Trigger-Site Deactivation Surgery for Headaches.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection for headache surgery is an important variable to ensure successful outcomes. In the authors' experience, a valuable method to visualize pain/trigger sites is to ask patients to draw their pain. The authors have found that there are pathognomonic pain patterns for each site, and typically do not operate on patients with atypical pain sketches, as they believe such patients are poor surgical candidates. However, a small subset of these atypical patients undergo surgery based on other strong clinical findings. In this study, the authors attempt to quantify this clinical experience. METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled and completed pain sketches at screening. One hundred six diagrams were analyzed/categorized by two independent, blinded reviewers as follows: (1) typical (pain over nerve distribution, expected radiation); (2) intermediate (pain over nerve distribution, atypical radiation); or (3) atypical (pain outside of normal nerve distribution, atypical radiation). Preoperative and postoperative Migraine Headache Index was compared between subgroups using unpaired t tests. RESULTS: Migraine Headache Index improvement was 73 ± 38 percent in the typical group, 78 ± 30 percent in the intermediate group, and 30 ± 40 percent in the atypical group. There was a significant difference in Migraine Headache Index between the typical and atypical groups (p = 0.03) and between the intermediate and atypical groups (p < 0.01). The chance of achieving Migraine Headache Index improvement greater than 30 percent in the atypical group was 20 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Patient pain sketches classified as atypical (facial pain, atypical pain point origin, diffuse pain) can predict poor outcomes in headache surgery. As the authors continue to develop patient selection criteria for headache surgery, patient sketches should be considered as an effective, cheap, and simple-to-interpret tool for selecting candidates for surgery.

Migraine Surgery at the Frontal Trigger Site: An Analysis of Intraoperative Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: The development of migraine headaches may involve the entrapment of peripheral craniofacial nerves at specific sites. Cadaveric studies in the general population have confirmed potential compression points of the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves at the frontal trigger site. The authors' aim was to describe the intraoperative anatomy of the supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves at the level of the supraorbital bony rim in patients undergoing frontal migraine surgery and to investigate associated pain. METHODS: PATIENTS: scheduled for frontal-site surgery were enrolled prospectively. The senior author (W.G.A.) evaluated intraoperative anatomy and recorded variables using a detailed form and operative report. The resulting data were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen sites among 61 patients were included. The supraorbital nerve traversed a notch in 49 percent, a foramen in 41 percent, a notch plus a foramen in 9.3 percent, and neither a notch nor a foramen in one site. The senior author noted macroscopic nerve compression at 74 percent of sites. Reasons included a tight foramen in 24 percent, a notch with a tight band in 34 percent, and supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves emerging by means of the same notch in 7.6 percent or by means of the same foramen in 4.2 percent. Preoperative pain at a site was significantly associated with nerve compression by a foramen. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative anatomy and cause of nerve compression at the frontal trigger site vary greatly among patients. The authors report a supraorbital nerve foramen prevalence of 50.3 percent, which is greater than in previous cadaver studies of the general population. Lastly, the presence of pain at a specific site is associated with macroscopic nerve compression.

Migraña: efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico: revisión de la literatura / Migraine headache: effectiveness of surgical treatment: review of the literature

Resumen La migraña afecta a un porcentaje importante de la población y los síntomas pueden interferir con calidad de vida de manera importante. A pesar de los avances en el manejo médico, existe una proporción de pacientes que no responden adecuadamente a la intervención farmacológica. En los últimos años, se han planteado nuevos enfoques en el tratamiento de la migraña. Éstos se basan en la teoría que ramas sensoriales extracraneales del trigémino y de los nervios espinales cervicales pueden irritarse, atraparse o comprimirse en algún punto a lo largo de su trayecto, generándose una cascada de eventos fisiológicos que finalmente resulta en la migraña. Se ha demostrado que la inyección diagnóstica y terapéutica de toxina botulínica y la descompresión quirúrgica de estos puntos gatillos reducen o eliminan las migrañas en pacientes que no responden adecuadamente a la intervención farmacológica y siguen sintomáticos. La evidencia que respalda la eficacia y seguridad de la descompresión quirúrgica de los puntos de gatillos periféricos se está acumulando rápidamente, y la tasa de éxito general de la cirugía se acerca a 90%. Este trabajo revisa la evidencia clínica y pretende proporcionar un artículo sobre el estado actual de la técnica en el tratamiento quirúrgico de las migrañas.

Migraine headaches affect a significant percentage of the population and the symptoms can interfere with quality of life in an important way. Despite advances in medical management, there is a proportion of patients who do not respond adequately to the pharmacological intervention. In recent years, new approaches have been proposed in the treatment of migraine. These are based on the theory that extracranial sensory branches of the trigeminal and cervical spinal nerves can become irritated, trapped or compressed at some point along their path, generating a cascade of physiological events that ultimately results in migraine. It has been shown that the diagnostic and therapeutic injection of botulinum toxin and the surgical decompression of these trigger points reduce or eliminate migraines in patients who do not respond adequately to the pharmacological intervention and remain symptomatic. The evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of surgical decompression of peripheral trigger points is rapidly accumulating, and the overall success rate of surgery approaches 90%. This paper reviews the clinical evidence and aims to provide an article on the current state of the art in the surgical treatment of migraines.

The Cutting Edge of Headache Surgery: A Systematic Review on the Value of Extracranial Surgery in the Treatment of Chronic Headache.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a debilitating neurologic condition, with a large socioeconomic impact. There is a subgroup of patients that does not adequately respond to pharmacologic management and may have underlying neuralgia. Surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as an alternative therapy. The aim of this article is to review the evidence for the surgical treatment of neuralgias. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to study the efficacy of decompression of extracranial sensory nerves as a treatment for neuralgia. Clinical studies were included that studied patients, aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with any definition of headache and were treated with extracranial nerve decompression surgery. Outcome parameters included intensity (on a 10-point scale), duration (in days), and frequency (of headaches per month). RESULTS: Thirty-eight articles were found describing extracranial nerve decompression in patients with headaches. Postoperative decrease in headache intensity ranged from 2 to 8.2, reduction of duration ranged from 0.04 to 1.04 days, and reduction in frequency ranged between 4 and 14.8 headaches per month. Total elimination of symptoms was achieved in 8.3 to 83 percent of cases. A detailed summary of the outcome of single-site decompression is described. Statistical pooling and therefore meta-analysis was not possible, because of articles having the same surgeon and an overlapping patient database. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve decompression surgery is an effective way of treating headaches in a specific population of patients with neuralgia. Although a meta-analysis of the current data was not possible, the extracranial decompression of peripheral head and neck sensory nerves has a high success rate.

Effectiveness of surgical treatment in chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: Migraine affects more than 35 million people in the United States of America, and 10% of the population in the world. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment in chronic migraine with frontal or occipital trigger areas. METHODS: We designed a pilot, proof of concept, and prospective study to analyze the effectiveness of surgical release of trigger nerves in severe frontal or occipital chronic migraines. The study was approved by the Ethics and Investigation Committee of Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González (Monterrey, N.L., Mexico). We included patients diagnosed with chronic migraine by the neurology service of Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González that attended our consult from March to December 2012. The patients were assessed by the MIDAS questionnaire and the diagnosis confirmed by injecting 2% lidocaine in the trigger sites. We realized a superior palpebral approach in frontal migraines to resection the glabellar muscles and an occipital approach to free the greater occipital nerve bilaterally. We evaluated complete and partial clinical response measuring the frequency, intensity, and duration of migraine episodes. RESULTS: We included three patients with Stage IV (severe incapacitating) frontal or occipital chronic migraines. Two were occipital trigger sites and one frontal. We obtained complete clinical response in two patients and a partial response in one. Pain intensity decreased in all patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment is effective in Stage IV (severe incapacitating) frontal or occipital trigger chronic migraines.

OBJETIVOS: La migraña crónica afecta a más de 35 millones de personas en los EE.UU. y al 10% de la población en México. El objetivo de este estudio fue valorar la efectividad del tratamiento quirúrgico en la migraña crónica con sitios detonantes frontal u occipital para proponerla como alternativa quirúrgica en nuestro medio. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de migraña crónica con sitios detonantes frontal u occipital valorados por el servicio de neurología del Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González (Monterrey, N.L., México) que acudieron a consulta de marzo a diciembre de 2012, con la autorización del Comité de Ética e Investigación. Se valoraron mediante el cuestionario MIDAS, y los sitios gatillo se confirmaron con la inyección de lidocaína al 2%. Se realizó un abordaje en el surco palpebral superior para liberar los músculos corrugadores y procerus en caso de detonante frontal, y un abordaje occipital para liberar el nervio occipital mayor bilateral. Se valoró la respuesta clínica total y parcial según la intensidad, la frecuencia y la duración de los episodios migrañosos mensuales. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron tres pacientes con migraña crónica en etapa IV (incapacidad grave), a los que correspondían dos sitios detonantes frontal y uno occipital. Obtuvimos dos pacientes con respuesta clínica completa y una con respuesta parcial. La intensidad del dolor mejoró en todos los pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento quirúrgico es efectivo en la migraña crónica con sitios detonantes frontal u occipital en pacientes con incapacidad grave.

In-Depth Review of Symptoms, Triggers, and Treatment of Occipital Migraine Headaches (Site IV).

BACKGROUND: This study reports the surgical technique and efficacy of deactivation of occipital-triggered migraine headaches. In addition, it reports the effect of surgical deactivation of occipital-triggered migraine headaches on migraine triggers and associated symptoms other than pain. METHODS: One hundred ninety-five patients undergoing surgery for occipital-triggered migraine headaches performed by a single surgeon, and followed for at least 1 year, were analyzed. Median regression adjusted for age, sex, and follow-up time was used to determine postoperative reduction in occipital-specific Migraine Headache Index, which is the product of migraine duration, frequency, and severity. Reduction in migraine-days was also measured. The association between symptom or trigger resolution and occipital-specific Migraine Headache Index reduction was studied by logistic regression. Details of surgical treatment are discussed and complication rates reported. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of patients (n = 160) reported successful surgery at least 12 months postoperatively (mean follow-up, 3.67 years). Eighty-six percent (n = 168) had successful surgery as measured by migraine-days. Fifty-two percent reported complete occipital-triggered migraine headaches elimination. Symptoms resolving with successful surgery beyond headache include being bothered by light and noise, feeling lightheaded, difficulty concentrating, vomiting, blurred/double vision, diarrhea, visual aura, numbness and tingling, speech difficulty, and limb weakness (p < 0.05). Triggers resolving with successful surgery include missed meals; bright sunshine; loud noise; fatigue; certain smells; stress; certain foods; coughing, straining, and bending over; letdown after stress; and weather change (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical deactivation of occipital-triggered migraine headaches provides long-lasting migraine relief. Successful site IV surgery is associated with changes in specific symptoms and triggers. This can assist in trigger avoidance and aid occipital-triggered migraine headache trigger-site identification. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Current Means for Detection of Migraine Headache Trigger Sites.

The authors' 15-year experience with migraine surgery has led them to believe that the most common reasons for incomplete response are failure to detect all of the trigger sites or, on rare occasions, inadequate surgery on the trigger sites. Thus, accurate identification of trigger sites is essential. The purpose of this article is to share the authors' current stepwise algorithm for accurately detecting the migraine trigger sites, which has evolved through surgery on nearly 1000 patients. To begin, a thorough history is taken. Each patient's constellation of symptoms can point toward one or multiple trigger points. The patient is asked to point to the most frequent site from which migraine headaches originate with one fingertip, and then the site is explored with a Doppler. If an arterial Doppler signal is identified at the site, it is considered an active arterial trigger site. Response to a nerve block with a local anesthetic in a patient with an active migraine headache confirms the presence of a trigger site. If the patient does not have pain at the time of the office visit, an injection of botulinum toxin A at the suspected trigger site may be considered. Although positive responses to botulinum toxin A and nerve block are very helpful and reliable in confirming the trigger sites, negative responses must be interpreted with extreme caution. In patients with a migraine headache starting from the retrobulbar site, a computed tomography scan of the paranasal sinuses is obtained to look for contact points and other pathology that would confirm rhinogenic trigger sites.

A socioeconomic analysis of surgical treatment of migraine headaches.

BACKGROUND: This study is meant to compare the direct and indirect cost of migraine headache care before and after migraine surgery and to evaluate any postoperative changes in patient participation in daily activities. METHODS: Eighty-nine patients enrolled in a migraine surgery clinical trial completed the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire, and a financial cost report preoperatively and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 63.0 months (range, 56.9 to 72.6 months). Migraine medication expenses were reduced by a median of $1997.26 annually. Median cost reduction for alternative treatment expenses was $450 annually. Patients had a median of three fewer annual primary care visits for the migraine headache treatment, resulting in a median cost reduction of $320 annually. Patients missed a median of 8.5 fewer days of work or childcare annually postoperatively, with a median regained income of $1525. The median total cost spent on migraine headache treatment was $5820 per year preoperatively, declining to $900 per year postoperatively. Total median cost reduction was $3949.70 per year postoperatively. The mean surgical cost was $8378. Significant improvements were demonstrated in all aspects of the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical deactivation of migraine trigger sites has proven to be effective for the treatment of severe migraine headache. This study illustrates that the surgical treatment is a cost-effective modality, reducing direct and indirect costs. Patients may also expect improvements in the performance of and increased participation in activities of daily living. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.