Seizures after single-agent overdose with pharmaceutical drugs: analysis of cases reported to a poison center.

CONTEXT: Seizures during intoxications with pharmaceuticals are a well-known complication. However, only a few studies report on drugs commonly involved and calculate the seizure potential of these drugs. OBJECTIVES: To identify the pharmaceutical drugs most commonly associated with seizures after single-agent overdose, the seizure potential of these pharmaceuticals, the age-distribution of the cases with seizures and the ingested doses. METHODS: A retrospective review of acute single-agent exposures to pharmaceuticals reported to the Swiss Toxicological Information Centre (STIC) between January 1997 and December 2010 was conducted. Exposures which resulted in at least one seizure were identified. The seizure potential of a pharmaceutical was calculated by dividing the number of cases with seizures by the number of all cases recorded with that pharmaceutical. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 15,441 single-agent exposures. Seizures occurred in 313 cases. The most prevalent pharmaceuticals were mefenamic acid (51 of the 313 cases), citalopram (34), trimipramine (27), venlafaxine (23), tramadol (15), diphenhydramine (14), amitriptyline (12), carbamazepine (11), maprotiline (10), and quetiapine (10). Antidepressants were involved in 136 cases. Drugs with a high seizure potential were bupropion (31.6%, seizures in 6 of 19 cases, 95% CI: 15.4-50.0%), maprotiline (17.5%, 10/57, 95% CI: 9.8-29.4%), venlafaxine (13.7%, 23/168, 95% CI: 9.3-19.7%), citalopram (13.1%, 34/259, 95% CI: 9.5-17.8%), and mefenamic acid (10.9%, 51/470, 95% CI: 8.4-14.0%). In adolescents (15-19y/o) 23.9% (95% CI: 17.6-31.7%) of the cases involving mefenamic acid resulted in seizures, but only 5.7% (95% CI: 3.3-9.7%) in adults (≥ 20y/o; p < 0.001). For citalopram these numbers were 22.0% (95% CI: 12.8-35.2%) and 10.9% (95% CI: 7.1-16.4%), respectively (p = 0.058). The probability of seizures with mefenamic acid, citalopram, trimipramine, and venlafaxine increased as the ingested dose increased. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressants were frequently associated with seizures in overdose, but other pharmaceuticals, as mefenamic acid, were also associated with seizures in a considerable number of cases. Bupropion was the pharmaceutical with the highest seizure potential even if overdose with bupropion was uncommon in our sample. Adolescents might be more susceptible to seizures after mefenamic acid overdose than adults. "Part of this work is already published as a conference abstract for the XXXIV International Congress of the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) 27-30 May 2014, Brussels, Belgium." Abstract 8, Clin Toxicol 2014;52(4):298.

Outcome in delusional depression comparing trimipramine monotherapy with a combination of amitriptyline and haloperidol--a double-blind multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with delusional depression are difficult to treat. The atypical antidepressant trimipramine was effective in a previous 4-week open label pilot study in patients with this disorder. The major neurobiological effect of trimipramine is the inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system. In delusional depression HPA overactivity is more distinct than in other subtypes of depression. HPA suppression is thought to contribute to the action of trimipramine. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled multicenter trial we compared the effects of trimipramine monotherapy versus a combination of amitriptyline and haloperidol. Dosage was increased stepwise from 100mg up to 400mg trimipramine and from 100mg up to 200mg amitriptyline combined with 2mg up to 7.5mg haloperidol. The average dose of trimipramine was higher than that of amitriptyline throughout the trial. During sixth week mean dosage (+/-standard deviation) were 356.1+/-61.2mg trimipramine, 184.0+/-23.6 mg amitriptyline and 6.3+/-1.8 mg haloperidol. During six weeks psychometric assessments were performed weekly. For HPA monitoring a dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (Dex/CRH) test was performed before active medication and at the end of treatment. Additionally tolerability was monitored by ECG, EEG assessment of extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia, clinical laboratory routine and recording of blood pressure and heart rate. Adverse events were documented. RESULTS: 94 patients were enclosed into the study. The per protocol sample consisted of 33 patients of the trimipramine group and of 24 patients of the amitriptyline/haloperidol group. The decrease of the Hamilton depression (HAMD) score (24 items) showed non-inferiority of trimipramine compared to amitriptyline/haloperidol. Twenty-eight patients (84.84%) in the trimipramine arm and 17 patients (70.83%) in the amitriptyline/haloperidol arm were responders (HAMD

Metabolism in adipose tissue in response to citalopram and trimipramine treatment--an in situ microdialysis study.

The intake of antidepressants is often accompanied by weight gain. Antidepressants may influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism that can result in metabolic changes and obesity. We investigated the effect of citalopram and trimipramine on interstitial glycerol, glucose and lactate concentration and blood flow in subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese subjects by means of the microdialysis technique. In addition, the effect of stimulation with norepinephrine on metabolic response was investigated. Each subject was compared to a control subject matched for BMI and age. Each group comprised 10 subjects. Circulating plasma triglyceride concentrations were higher in drug-treated groups. In subcutaneous adipose tissue, microdialysis experiments revealed a higher and prolonged glycerol release in the presence of norepinephrine, but not under basal conditions. In citalopram treated subjects, basal glucose and lactate concentrations were higher compared with controls or with the trimipramine treated group. Local administration of norepinephrine induced a decrease in glucose levels and an increase in lactate levels, but without significant differences between groups. Local adipose tissue blood flow decreased in control groups following norepinephrine application, but remained constant in the antidepressant groups. In conclusion, citalopram and trimipramine affected glucose and lipid metabolism in adipose tissue and resulted in enhanced release of glycerol and free fatty acids into the circulation.

Galactorrhea during treatment with trimipramine. A case report.

Trimipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant, faced renewed attention in the last decade for its well-established antidepressant as well as its sleep-promoting properties. While the antidepressant mode of action of trimipramine is still unclear, its antihistaminic and anticholinergic potency is far better known, leading to side effects such as somnolence or dry mouth. Elevated prolactin serum levels, caused by antidopaminergic action, have been repeatedly observed. However, to our knowledge no case of galactorrhea while under treatment with trimipramine had been previously reported. A 31-year-old female inpatient, admitted to our hospital after an attempted suicide, was treated initially with paroxetine 20 mg/d. Because of persisting insomnia, after 5 weeks we gave a supplementary medication, trimipramine, with a successive increase in dose up to 150 mg/d. After another 9 weeks the patient reported a strong tension in both breasts together with galactorrhea. The prolactin serum level was 21.8 ng/ml. After reduction of the trimipramine dose to 50 mg/d, the symptoms disappeared within a few days. We discuss our case with special regard to the combination of trimipramine with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This commonly used comedication could have led to an aggravation of the problem because (1) most SSRIs stimulate prolactin secretion and (2) trimipramine is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 2D6, which in turn is inhibited by all SSRIs, thus potentially leading to elevated trimipramine plasma levels. The problem can probably be kept to a minimum by giving lower doses of trimipramine (up to 50 mg/d) if co-administered with an SSRI.

Fluoxetine versus trimipramine in the treatment of depression in geriatric patients.

INTRODUCTION: Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), and trimipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), were compared in terms of efficacy and tolerability in a six-week, parallel group, double-blind pilot study in 41 geriatric patients with major depression (61 - 85 years old). METHOD: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17), the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS), the Adjective Mood Scale (Bf-S), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and the Patients Global Impression (PGI) were used to measure changes in depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Improvement with treatment was found on all scales. Efficacy and tolerability were similar in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that fluoxetine and trimipramine are comparable in terms of efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of major depression in geriatric patients.

Clinical outcome after trimipramine in patients with delusional depression - a pilot study.

The treatment of delusional depression is a major challenge in psychopharmacology. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) overdrive may contribute, via increased dopaminergic activity, to the pathophysiology of the disorder. Trimipramine appears to be an interesting potential candidate, since it is an atypical antidepressant that is known to inhibit HPA activity. In a four-week open trial we investigated its effects in 15 inpatients with delusional depression. The dosage was increased within 7 days up to 300 - 400 mg/d and was then maintained for three weeks. Psychometric assessments and safety monitoring were conducted weekly. Assessment of the HPA activity was achieved by a combined dexamethasone suppression/corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation (Dex/CRH) test before and after four weeks of treatment. Therapeutic response was defined as a decrease in the HAMD-score of at least 50 %. Eight out of 13 completers were rated as responders. Therapeutic response was associated with L, D-trimipramine concentrations higher than 160 ng/ml. Intent-to-treat analysis showed significant improvement in psychometric variables. Despite the high dosage, the substance was generally well tolerated, with the exception of one patient who suffered from a hypotensive reaction. Mean +/- SD concentration of L-trimipramine and D-trimipramine were 138 +/- 61 ng/ml and 119 +/- 50 ng/ml at a final dose of 346 +/- 50 mg/d. The ACTH and cortisol area under the curve in the Dex/CRH tests decreased significantly, reflecting a decrease of activity in the HPA system. We suggest that the clinical use of high-dose trimipramine in delusional depression seems to be a promising treatment strategy.

Trimipramine in primary insomnia: results of a polysomnographic double-blind controlled study.

In recent years, sedating antidepressants have been increasingly used to treat primary insomnia. Up to now, only one open pilot study with trimipramine and one double-blind placebo-controlled study with doxepin have provided scientific support for this approach in treating primary insomnia. In order to test the hypothesis that sedating antidepressants are useful in the treatment of primary insomnia, the effect of trimipramine on objectively and subjectively measured parameters of sleep was investigated in a double-blind placebo- and lormetazepam-controlled study in a sample of 55 patients with primary insomnia attending outpatient sleep-disorder clinics. Trimipramine was selected since it has shown positive effects on sleep continuity with a lack of REM sleep suppression in studies on depressed patients and in one pilot study on patients with primary insomnia. Trimipramine at an average dose of 100 mg over a period of 4 weeks significantly enhanced sleep efficiency, but not total sleep time (which had been the primary target variable) compared to placebo as measured by polysomnography. Changes in objective sleep parameters were paralleled by changes in subjective sleep parameters. Trimipramine did not suppress REM sleep. Lormetazepam decreased wake time and sleep stage 3 and increased REM sleep compared to placebo. After switching trimipramine to placebo, sleep parameters returned to baseline. There was no evidence of any rebound effect from trimipramine. Side effects from trimipramine were only marginal. This first double-blind placebo-controlled study with trimipramine suggests its efficacy in the treatment of primary insomnia. However, due to the large intra- and interindividual variance in the parameters of interest before and during treatment a larger sample size would have been necessary to strengthen the validity of our findings.

Differential effects of trimipramine and fluoxetine on sleep in geriatric depression.

The effects of trimipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) with atypical pharmacological properties, and fluoxetine, a selective serotonine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), were compared in an exploratory analysis using mood and polysomnographic parameters during a six-week double-blind trial in 19 depressed geriatric patients. In sleep EEG measures, trimipramine demonstrated clear-cut effects on sleep measures resulting in higher values for sleep efficiency, total sleep time, stage 2 sleep, and shorter wake time. Under fluoxetine treatment, the proportion of REM sleep was decreased and REM latency was lengthened, whereas no change in REM sleep parameters was observed in the trimipramine group. The present data suggest that early antidepressant effects of medication occur independently of drug-induced changes in objective measures of sleep, i.e. suppression of REM sleep.

Seizures associated with therapeutic doses of venlafaxine and trimipramine.

OBJECTIVE: To report a patient having a first-time seizure after receiving venlafaxine and trimipramine for depression. CASE SUMMARY: A 25-year-old white woman with chronic depression was treated with venlafaxine 150 mg/d and trimipramine 50 mg/d. Eleven days after increase of the trimipramine dosage to 100 mg/d, she was hospitalized because of seizures suggesting a secondary generalized grand-mal episode. The electroencephalogram showed a pathologic pattern with several generalized epileptiform discharges. Because of suspected drug-induced seizures, both antidepressants were stopped. After antidepressant drug cessation, the patient was symptom free and had no further seizure episodes within the following 12 months of follow-up. No other potential cause for the seizure episode could be identified. DISCUSSION: Both venlafaxine and trimipramine have been associated with seizures, mainly after overdose. Venlafaxine-associated seizures at therapeutic doses have not been reported in the literature. We hypothesize that a pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic drug interaction between venlafaxine and trimipramine involving the CYP2D6 isoenzyme may have played a role in inducing the seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the proepileptogenic effect of venlafaxine and trimipramine at therapeutic doses and that this combination may eventually increase the risk of seizures.

Safety of liver donation after fatal intoxication with the tricyclic antidepressant trimipramine.

We report the case of a patient receiving long-term treatment with the tricyclic antidepressant trimipramine who died 10 days after a trimipramine overdose. A few hours before death, the serum trimipramine concentration had fallen to 80 microg/L. Similar values are reported for patients taking therapeutic trimipramine doses. At this serum concentration, the liver content of trimipramine and it's 2-hydroxy and N-desmethyl metabolites was 1750 microg/kg, 850 microg/kg, and 225 microg/kg, respectively. The liver was morphologically normal. Back calculations suggest that a liver transplant obtained from a donor dying from a trimipramine overdose should be safe, if the serum trimipramine concentration has fallen below 2000 microg/L. If higher serum trimipramine concentrations are present, harvesting should be delayed to avoid trimipramine toxicity in the recipient.

[Depressive stupor--malignant neuroleptic syndrome--serotonin syndrome. A case contribution to a difficult differential diagnosis]. / Depressiver Stupor--malignes neuroleptisches Syndrom--Serotoninsyndrom. Ein kasuistischer Beitrag zu einer schwierigen Differentialdiagnose.

Depressive stupor and malignant neuroleptic syndrome are very well-known problems in clinical psychiatry. The serotonin syndrome, however, a potentially life-threatening side effect of treatment with serotonergic substances, has been included in the clinical differential diagnosis increasingly often in the last few years. The development of new serotonin selective antidepressants and selective reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A has led to the use of more and more substances that can cause these life-threatening complications if they are taken in too high doses or together with other drugs. We present a 61 year old depressed female impatient who developed an abortive malignant neuroleptic syndrome while being treated for depressive stupor. We discuss a possible relation between serotonin syndrome and a highly dosed combination therapy with moclobemide. Owing to the importance of both syndromes, we consider drug monitoring absolutely necessary for patients who are being treated with new antidepressants, and especially for those who develop neurological and psychiatric complications when such preparations are given in combination with other drugs.

Trimipramine and imipramine exert different effects on the sleep EEG and on nocturnal hormone secretion during treatment of major depression.

In a 4-week double-blind clinical trial we compared the effects of the tricyclic antidepressants trimipramine and imipramine on the sleep EEG and on nocturnal bormone secretion in 20 male inpatients with major depression. Both treatments produced rapid significant clinical improvement in depression without severe adverse effects. However, the two drugs had markedly different neurobiologic profiles. Trimipramine enhanced rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and slow wave sleep, whereas imipramine suppressed REM sleep and showed no effect on slow wave sleep. Total sleep time and the sleep efficiency index increased under trimipramine but not under imipramine. Nocturnal cortisol secretion decreased with trimipramine but remained unchanged with imipramine. In contrast to imipramine, trimipramine induced an increase in prolactin secretion compatible with its known antagonism at dopamine (D2) receptors. Imipramine induced a decrease in growth hormone secretion during the first half of the night. Neither of the drugs induced significant changes in plasma testosterone concentration. We conclude that trimipramine is an antidepressant with sleep-improving qualities that possibly acts through inhibition of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical system activity by a yet unknown mechanism.

[Sleep disorders--what can be done when hypnotics no longer help? Overview and case report]. / Schlafstörungen--Was tun, wenn Schlafmittel nicht mehr helfen? Ubersicht und Fallvorstellung.

We report on the case of a 45-year old female with chronic insomnia and refractory to hypnotics, who also has a - polygraphically documented - tolerance to the imidazopyridine "zolpidem". We discuss the main differential diagnosis and demonstrate a therapeutic regimen which allows a step-by-step replacement of hypnotics by sedative antidepressants. This interval replacement treatment reduces on the one hand the risk of developing a severe withdrawal syndrome. On the other hand the replacement by sedative antidepressants improves insomnia and insomnia-associated depressive symptoms. Finally, the clinical implications and rationale of a therapeutic approach with sedative antidepressants in chronic insomnia are discussed.

[Psychotropic drug-induced myoclonus]. / Psychopharmakainduzierte Myoklonien.

Based on five case studies, the suggestion is that, if physiological myoclonus can be excluded, antidepressant - or neuroleptic-induced myoclonus must as a rule be presumed to be a most subtle indication of increased cerebral exitability, an epileptic fragment or, in some instances, a myoclonus epilepsy. In each of the reported cases EEG recordings reflected epilepsy-specific potentials. Whether, however, the scope of differences in the EEG recordings and the N1/P1 amplitude increase of the SSEP may be used as an additional diagnostic criterion to determine the risk of epileptic seizures, should depend on the type of myoclonus chiefly induced. This would require more extensive neurophysiological examinations which should mainly include the back-averaging to permit, beside the EEG, a better evaluation of the relatively easily obtainable SSEP findings.

Increased trimipramine plasma levels during fluvoxamine comedication.

A depressive patient, a non-responder to trimipramine (TRI), was comedicated first with citalopram (CIT) and then with fluvoxamine (FLUV). Both the TRI-CIT and TRI-FLUV combination treatments led to a worsening of the depressive state and to the appearance of panic attacks. The addition of FLUV to TRI resulted in a twofold increase of the plasma levels of TRI and to a slight increase of its N-demethylated and 2-hydroxylated metabolites. These results suggest that the interaction between FLUV and TRI occurred at the level of cytochrome P-450IID6 and cytochrome P-450meph in this patient, phenotyped as an extensive metabolizer of both dextromethorphan and mephenytoin. The adverse effects were possibly due to (a) a pharmacokinetic interaction between CIT and FLUV with TRI and/or (b) alterations in serotonergic and/or dopaminergic neurotransmission.

Treatment of primary insomnia with trimipramine: an alternative to benzodiazepine hypnotics?

A group of 19 middle aged patients suffering from primary insomnia according to the DSM-III-R were treated in a single-blind study with trimipramine, a sedating antidepressant. A total of 15 patients completed the study protocol and were evaluated. The present pilot study aimed at investigating the sleep-inducing properties of trimipramine, and at clarifying the question of whether short- or long-term rebound insomnia occurs after discontinuation of this drug. At four measurement points, i.e. under baseline conditions, under treatment and 4 and 14 days after drug discontinuation, sleep was recorded with an ambulatory-electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring device in the patient's home environment. Simultaneously, psychometric tests were applied to measure withdrawal symptoms, subjective sleep quality and well-being during daytime. Trimipramine at a mean dose of 166 +/- 48 mg led to a significant increase in sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and stage 2% sleep-period time (SPT), whereas a significant decrease in wake time and stage 1% SPT was noted. Insomniac patients reported an improvement in subjectively perceived sleep quality following trimipramine. Additionally, an improvement in well-being during the daytime occurred. Negative side effects were limited to dry mouth due to the anticholinergic properties of the drug. Discontinuation of trimipramine did not provoke either short- or long-term rebound insomnia in objective and subjective sleep measurements considering mean values of the whole sample, although a subgroup of patients did display total sleep times below baseline values during short- and long-term withdrawal, but generally without a concomitant worsening of sleep quality according to the sleep questionnaire.