Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7 mosaic case: CMA, CNV-seq, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and MS-MLPA, which technique to choose?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to perform a prenatal genetic diagnosis of a high-risk fetus with trisomy 7 identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the efficacy of different genetic testing techniques for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy mosaicism. METHODS: For prenatal diagnosis of a pregnant woman with a high risk of trisomy 7 suggested by NIPT, karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were performed on an amniotic fluid sample. Low-depth whole-genome copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to clarify the results further. In addition, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) was performed to analyze the possibility of uniparental disomy(UPD). RESULTS: Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis revealed a 46, XX result. Approximately 20% mosaic trisomy 7 was detected according to the CMA result. About 16% and 4% of mosaicism was detected by CNV-seq and FISH, respectively. MS-MLPA showed no methylation abnormalities. The fetal ultrasound did not show any detectable abnormalities except for mild intrauterine growth retardation seen at 39 weeks of gestation. After receiving genetic counseling, the expectant mother decided to continue the pregnancy, and follow-up within three months of delivery was normal. CONCLUSION: In high-risk NIPT diagnosis, a combination of cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques proves fruitful in detecting low-level mosaicism. Furthermore, the exclusion of UPD on chromosome 7 remains crucial when NIPT indicates a positive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 7.

[Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with 1p36 deletion syndrome and 3p26.3p25.2 duplication].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the characteristics of a fetus with chromosome 1p36 deletion syndrome and 3p26.3p25.2 duplication. METHODS: A pregnant woman who had attended the Genetic Counseling Clinic of Linyi People's Hospital on February 22, 2022 and her fetus were selected as the study subjects. Clinical data were collected. Chromosomal karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) were carried out for the prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: Ultrasonography at 24th gestational week revealed that the fetus had ventricular septal defect, single umbilical artery, and slight widening of left lateral ventricle (12 mm). The woman was found to have a karyotype of 46,XX,t(1;3)(p36.22;p25.2), and the result of FISH was t(1;3)(3pter+,1qter+;1pter+,3qter+). The fetus was found to have a karyotype of 46,X?,add(1)(p36), and CMA confirmed that it has a 9.0 Mb deletion at 1p36.33p36.22 and a 12.6 Mb duplication at 3p26.3p25.2. Combining the maternal karyotype, the molecular karyotype of the fetus was determined as 46,X?,der(1)t(1;3)(p36.22;p25.2)mat.arr[hg19]1p36.33p36.22(849467_9882666)×1, 3p26.3p25.2(61892_12699607)×3, with the former known to be associated with 1p36 deletion syndrome. CONCLUSION: The fetus was diagnosed with 1p36 deletion syndrome, and its 1p36.33p36.22 deletion and 3p26.3p25.2 duplication had both derived from the balanced translocation carried by its mother.

Prenatal diagnosis of 18p deletion and 8p trisomy syndrome: literature review and report of a novel case.

18p deletion syndrome constitutes one of the most frequent autosomal terminal deletion syndromes, affecting one in 50,000 live births. The syndrome has un-specific clinical features which vary significantly between patients and may overlap with other genetic conditions. Its prenatal description is extremely rare as the fetal phenotype is often not present during pregnancy. Trisomy 8p Syndrome is characterized by heterogenous phenotype, with the most frequent components to be cardiac malformation, developmental and intellectual delay. Its prenatal diagnosis is very rare due to the unspecific sonographic features of the affected fetuses. We present a very rare case of a fetus with multiple anomalies diagnosed during the second trimester whose genomic analysis revealed a 18p Deletion and 8p trisomy Syndrome. This is the first case where this combination of DNA mutations has been described prenatally and the second case in general. The presentation of this case, as well as the detailed review of all described cases, aim to expand the existing knowledge regarding this rare condition facilitating its diagnosis in the future.

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result. CONCLUSION: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

The role of confined placental mosaicism in fetal growth restriction: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which cytogenetic characteristics of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) detected in the first trimester chorionic villi and/or placentas in terms of chromosome aberration, cell lineage involved and trisomy origin will lead to fetal growth restriction and low birthweight. METHODS: Cohort study using routinely collected perinatal data and cytogenetic data of non-invasive prenatal testing, the first trimester chorionic villi sampling and postnatal placentas. RESULTS: 215 CPM cases were found. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) and low birthweight below the 10th percentile (BW < p10) were seen in 34.0% and 23.1%, respectively. Excluding cases of trisomy 16, 29.1% showed FGR and 17.9% had a BW < p10. The highest rate of FGR and BW < p10 was found in CPM type 3, but differences with type 1 and 2 were not significant. FGR and BW < p10 were significantly more often observed in cases with meiotic trisomies. CONCLUSION: There is an association between CPM and FGR and BW < p10. This association is not restricted to trisomy 16, neither to CPM type 3, nor to CPM involving a meiotic trisomy. Pregnancies with all CPM types and origins should be considered to be at increased risk of FGR and low BW < p10. A close prenatal fetal monitoring is indicated in all cases of CPM.

Use of the MS-MLPA assay in prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome with mosaic trisomy 15.

OBJECTIVE: We present a prenatal diagnosis strategy of using Methylation-Specific Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MS-MLPA) for the detection of maternal uniparental disomy 15/trisomy 15 (UPD(15) mat/T15) mosaicism. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 19 weeks of gestation due to a high risk of trisomy 15 (T15) as indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype of 46, XX of cultured amniocytes. Further analysis using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) analysis showed 55 % T15 mosaicism. The second amniocentesis was performed and showed a karyotype of 46, XX and 26 % T15 mosaicism by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MS-MLPA analysis of uncultured amniocytes showed that the copy number ratio of 15q11-13 ranged from 1.3 to 1.5, and the percentage of methylation was between 70 % and 100 %. MS-MLPA assay of cultured amniocytes showed a copy number ratio of 1 and a methylation percentage of 100 %. Therefore, this fetus was identified to be an UPD(15) mat/T15 mosaicism. The parents decided to terminate the pregnancy. CONCLUSION: MS-MLPA can be used in combination with karyotype and CNV-seq for prenatal diagnosis of NIPT high-risk T15 to avoid missed diagnosis of UPD(15) mat/T15 mosaicism.

[Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with high risks by screening of fetal free DNA from peripheral blood samples].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy for women with a high risk for fetal aneuploidies. METHODS: A total of 747 cases of prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis due to high risks by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) were selected from January 2015 to March 2022 in the Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School. The amniotic fluid samples were subjected to chromosomal karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. All cases were followed up by searching the birth information or telephone calls, and the results were recorded. 2 test or F test were used for comparing the difference between the groups. RESULTS: Among the 747 pregnant women with a high risk by NIPT, 387 were true positives, and the overall positive predictive value (PPV) was 51.81%. The PPVs for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13) and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) were 80.24% (199/248), 60% (48/80), 14% (7/50) and 38.97% (106/272), respectively. The PPV for T21 was significantly higher than T18 and T13 (χ2 = 85.216, P < 0.0001). The PPV for other chromosomal aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs) were 11.11% (5/45) and 40.74% (22/52), respectively. The PPV for increased X chromosomes was significantly higher than X chromosome decreases (64.29% vs. 22.22%, χ2 = 5.530, P < 0.05). The overall PPV for elder women (≥ 35 years old) was significantly higher than younger women (69.35% vs. 42.39%, χ2 = 49.440, P < 0.0001). For T21 and T18, the PPV of Z ≥ 10 group was significantly higher than that for 3 ≤ Z < 5 group or 5 ≤ Z < 10 group (P < 0.05). Among 52 cases with a high risk for CNVs, the PPV for the ≤ 5 Mb group was significantly higher than the 5 Mb < CNVs < 10 Mb or > 10 Mb groups (60% vs. 30%60% vs. 23.53%, P < 0.05). Among the 387 true positive cases, 322 had opted for induced labor, 53 had delivered with no abnormal growth and development, and 12 were lost during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: The PPVs for common chromosomal aneuploidies are related to the age and Z value of the pregnant women, which were higher in the elder group and higher Z value group. In addition, the PPV is associated with high risk types. The PPV for T21 was higher than T18 and T13, and that for 45,X was lower than 47,XXX, 47,XYY or 47,XXY syndrome. NIPT therefore has relatively high PPVs for the identification of chromosomal CNVs.

[Genetic analysis of the false positive trisomy 7 and false negative trisomy 18 by NIPT-PLUS].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the cause of inconsistency between the results of trisomy 7 by expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-PLUS) and trisomy 18 by prenatal diagnosis. METHODS: A pregnant woman who received genetic counseling at Jiaozuo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital on July 5, 2020 was selected as the study subject. NIPT-PLUS, systematic ultrasound and interventional prenatal testing were carried out. The middle segment and root of umbilical cord, center and edge of the maternal and fatal surface of the placenta were sampled for the validation by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). RESULTS: The result of NIPT-PLUS indicated that the fetus has trisomy 7. Systematic ultrasound has shown multiple malformations including atrioventricular septal defect, horseshoe kidney, and rocker-bottom feet. However, QF-PCR, chromosomal karyotyping analysis, and CNV-seq of amniotic fluid samples all showed that the fetus was trisomy 18. Validation using multiple placental samples confirmed that the middle segment of the umbilical cord contains trisomy 18, the center of the placenta contained trisomy 7, and other placental sites were mosaicism for trisomy 7 and trisomy 18. Notably, the ratio of trisomy 18 became lower further away from the umbilical cord. CONCLUSION: The false positive results of trisomy 7 and false negative trisomy 18 by NIPT-PLUS was probably due to the existence of placental mosaicism. Strict prenatal diagnosis is required needed aneuploidy is detected by NIPT-PLUS to exclude the influence of placental mosaicisms.

Correlation between telomere shortening in maternal peripheral blood and fetal aneuploidy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess whether maternal telomere length is a more accurate predictor of trisomy 21 than maternal age while also exploring the factors influencing maternal and fetal telomere length. METHODS: Forty mothers with fetuses carrying extra maternal copies of chromosome 21 were defined as trisomy 21 cases, and 18 mothers with normal karyotype fetuses were defined as controls. Telomere lengths of maternal blood lymphocytes and amniotic fluid cells were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Fetal and maternal telomere lengths were compared between the two groups. Moreover, we analyzed the factors influencing maternal and fetal telomere length in the trisomy 21 pedigree. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlation between maternal telomere length and trisomy 21 risk. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the accuracy of using maternal telomere length as an indicator of trisomy 21 risk. RESULTS: The study revealed that both maternal and fetal telomere lengths were significantly shorter in trisomy 21 cases than in the controls. In the trisomy 21 group, the maternal age, occupation, and nationality showed no significant correlation with their telomere length; fetal telomere length exhibited a positive correlation with maternal telomere length. Furthermore, maternal telomere length shortening is associated with trisomy 21 (OR = 0.311; 95% CI, 0.109-0.885, P < 0.05). The results of ROC curve analysis indicated that a combined assessment of maternal age and maternal telomere length predicted fetal chromosome trisomy more effectively than a single assessment (area under the curve 0.808, 95% CI, 0.674-0.941, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Maternal age combined with maternal telomere length proved to be a superior predictor of trisomy risk. Additionally, maternal telomere length was found to influence fetal telomere length.

Combined Z-scores to assess the impact of rare autosomal trisomies that results in non-invasive prenatal screening on pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to combine Z-scores to evaluate the effects of rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) in non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) on pregnancy outcomes at a single center. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of women with high-risk RATs results using NIPS at a single center between January 2017 and December 2021. NIPS-positive results were separated into three groups based on the Z-value of RATs (Group1: 6 ≤ Z < 10; Group2: 10 ≤ Z < 15; Group 3: Z ≥ 15). Pregnancy outcomes of women with RATs were compared with the low-risk NIPS group. RESULTS: Overall, 83 RATs were identified in 23,321 NIPS results at our center. Prenatal diagnosis was conducted for 55 patients, and no case was confirmed, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of zero. Fifteen of these patients had adverse pregnancy outcomes, including delivered preterm and/or birth weight (9/15, 60.0 %), structural abnormalities (4/15, 26.7 %), miscarriage (1/15, 6.7 %), and intrauterine death (1/15, 6.7 %). There were 8 (8/22, 36.4 %) adverse pregnancy outcomes in Group 3, which was significantly higher than that in the low-risk NIPS group (p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the control group and Group 1 and Group 2 (p > 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should pay more attention to the RATs results when the Z-score is ≥ 15. The data are available for clinicians to guide the prenatal diagnosis of RATs and pregnancy management.

Relationships among maternal monosomy X mosaicism, maternal trisomy, and discordant sex chromosome aneuploidies.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of maternal factors on the false-positive fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) results obtained through noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pregnant women with high-risk SCAs as revealed using NIPS between January 2017 and December 2022. Clinical data such as results of invasive prenatal diagnoses, copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and pregnancy outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 177 (0.6 %) women with SCA-positive results were collected from 27,941 patients who had undergone NIPS. Among them, 110 (62.2 %) pregnant women chose prenatal diagnosis and 39 (35.5 %) cases were confirmed. For the women with monosomy X false-positive results from the NIPS, 53.1 % (17/32) were found to be maternal mosaicism monosomy X. In cases with 47, XXX false-positive results, 60 % (6/10) of them were maternal 47,XXX (5 cases) or maternal mosaicism 47,XXX (1 case). One (1/6, 16.7 %) case of maternal mosaicism monosomy X was detected in the false positive results of 47, XXY/47, XYY revealed. The incidence rate of maternal sex chromosome abnormalities was positively correlated with the Z-score of ChrX. When the Z-score of ChrX ≥ 15, more than 50 % of pregnant women were found to be maternal sex chromosome abnormalities, and when Z-score ≥ 30, the incidence rate was as high as 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal monosomy X mosaicism and trisomy X respectively played an important role in the discordance of 45, X and 47, XXX revealed by NIPS. CNV-seq was recommended for the pregnant women at risk of maternal sex chromosome abnormalities, which could help clinicians to provide more accurate and efficient advice during genetic counseling and to guide appropriate prenatal diagnosis strategy for the next pregnancy.

Partial Trisomy 4p Syndrome Diagnosed Prenatally.

Introduction: Trisomy 4p is a lethal chromosomal disorder, resulting from segmental or full trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 4. Prenatal diagnosis may allow decisions on whether to continue or terminate the pregnancy. Case report: We diagnosed a fetus with partial trisomy 4p after first-trimester ultrasound detection of increased nuchal translucency, allowing the parents the opportunity to terminate the pregnancy. The partial trisomy 4p was inherited from a balanced translocation carried by the father. Discussion/Conclusion: For this family, the risk of unbalanced chromosomal alterations in subsequent pregnancies is increased due to the father's translocation. Appropriate genetic counseling with future prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis can be offered to the couple. Trisomy 4p can be associated with increased nuchal thickness in the first trimester.

The first reported case of double trisomy 10 and 20 in a product of conception.

BACKGROUND: Double trisomies are rare findings among products of conception and are often lethal to the developing embryo or fetus. METHODS: Here we describe a double trisomy case with symptoms of threatened miscarriage at 9 weeks gestation. Ultrasound revealed an anembryonic pregnancy. Pregnancy was terminated by dilation and curettage at gestational age 11 weeks and 6 days. Histologic examination and chromosome microarray were performed on a formalin-fixed product of conception (POC) sample to identify the cause of the anembryonic pregnancy. RESULTS: Chromosome microarray analysis revealed a female chromosome complement with double trisomies 10 and 20, arr(10,20)x3, consistent with a karyotype of 48,XX,+10,+20. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of double trisomy 10 and 20 in a POC. Due to nonspecific histopathological findings, chromosomal microarray is a powerful tool in identifying and differentiating chromosomal aneuploidies.

Identification of Fetuses at Increased Risk of Trisomies in the First Trimester Using Axial Planes.

INTRODUCTION: The measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) is crucial for assessing risk of aneuploidies in the first trimester. We investigate the ability of NT assessed by a transverse view of the fetal head to detect fetuses at increased risk of common aneuploidies at 11-13 weeks of gestation. METHODS: We enrolled a nonconsecutive series of women who attended our outpatient clinic from January 2020 to April 2021 for aneuploidy screening by means of a first trimester combined test. All women were examined by operators certified by the Fetal Medicine Foundation. In each patient, NT measurements were obtained both from the median sagittal view and transverse view. We calculated the risk of aneuploidy using NT measurements obtained both with sagittal and axial scans, and then we compared the results. RESULTS: A total of 1,023 women were enrolled. An excellent correlation was found between sagittal and transverse NT measurements. The sensitivity and specificity of the axial scan to identify fetuses that were deemed at risk of trisomy 21 using standard sagittal scans were 40/40 = 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.2-100.0) and 977/983 = 99.4% (95% CI: 98.7-99.7), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the axial scan to identify fetuses at risk of trisomy 13 or 18 were 16/16 = 100.0% (95% CI: 80.6-100.0) and 1,005/1,007 = 99.8% (95% CI: 99.3-99.9). CONCLUSIONS: When the sonogram, a part of combined test screening, is performed by an expert sonologist, axial views can reliably identify fetuses at increased risk of trisomies without an increase in false negative results.

Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis: Noninvasive prenatal testing should replace other screening strategies for fetal trisomies 13, 18, 21.

This is a written summary of the oral debate presented at the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis annual conference in Edinburgh in 2023. The topic under debate is whether noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA should replace other screening strategies for the detection of fetal trisomies 13, 18, 21. There is no disagreement that NIPT is far more sensitive and has better positive predictive values for identifying trisomies 13, 18, and 21 than traditional screening approaches using biochemical markers and measurement of nuchal translucency. The major issue lies in the potential adverse consequences associated with abandoning traditional screening methods. The source of disagreement stems primarily from whether you consider the role of ultrasound in the context of screening to be strictly for nuchal translucency measurement or whether it should be combined with a fetal anatomy scan. The debate featured two experts who presented evidence in favor of each argument.