Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Surgery ; 171(2): 453-458, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538340

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was an assessment of availability postoperative pain management quality measures and National Quality Forum-endorsed measures. Postoperative pain is an important clinical timepoint because poor pain control can lead to patient suffering, chronic opiate use, and/or chronic pain. Quality measures can guide best practices, but it is unclear whether there are measures for managing pain after surgery. METHODS: The National Quality Forum Quality Positioning System, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Indicators, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Measures Inventory Tool databases were searched in November 2019. We conducted a systematic literature review to further identify quality measures in research publications, clinical practice guidelines, and gray literature for the period between March 11, 2015 and March 11, 2020. RESULTS: Our systematic review yielded 1,328 publications, of which 206 were pertinent. Nineteen pain management quality measures were identified from the quality measure databases, and 5 were endorsed by National Quality Forum. The National Quality Forum measures were not specific to postoperative pain management. Three of the non-endorsed measures were specific to postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The dearth of published postoperative pain management quality measures, especially National Quality Forum-endorsed measures, highlights the need for more rigorous evidence and widely endorsed postoperative pain quality measures to guide best practices.


Subject(s)
Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice Gaps/statistics & numerical data , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
2.
Pediatrics ; 145(4)2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32169895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For children who cannot be discharged from the emergency department, definitive care has become less frequent at most hospitals. It is uncertain whether this is true for common conditions that do not require specialty care. We sought to determine how the likelihood of definitive care has changed for 3 common pediatric conditions: asthma, croup, and gastroenteritis. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database to study children <18 years old presenting to emergency departments in the United States from 2008 to 2016 with a primary diagnosis of asthma, croup, or gastroenteritis, excluding critically ill patients. The primary outcome was referral rate: the number of patients transferred among all patients who could not be discharged. Analyses were stratified by quartile of annual pediatric volume. We used logistic regression to determine if changes over time in demographics or comorbidities could account for referral rate changes. RESULTS: Referral rates increased for each condition in all volume quartiles. Referral rates were greatest in the lowest pediatric volume quartile. Referral rates in the lowest pediatric volume quartile increased for asthma (13.6% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6%-22.2%), croup (14.8% per year; 95% CI 2.6%-28.3%), and gastroenteritis (16.4% per year; 95% CI 3.5%-31.0%). Changes over time in patient age, sex, comorbidities, weekend presentation, payer mix, urban-rural location of presentation, or area income did not account for these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing referral rates over time suggest decreasing provision of definitive care and regionalization of inpatient care for 3 common, generally straightforward conditions.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Croup/therapy , Emergency Treatment/trends , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Referral and Consultation/trends , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Emergency Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Patient Transfer/trends , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
3.
Am J Surg ; 220(1): 222-228, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Administrative data can be used to identify cases of postoperative respiratory failure (PRF). We aimed to determine if recent changes to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator 11 (PSI 11) and adoption of clinical documentation improvement programs have improved the validity of PSI 11. We also analyzed reasons why PSI 11 was falsely triggered. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of all eligible discharges using health record data from five academic medical centers between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015. RESULTS: Of 437 flagged records, 434 (99.3%) were accurately coded and 414 (94.7%) represented true clinical PRF. None of the false positive records involved respiratory failure present on admission. Most (78.3%) false positive records required airway protection but did not have respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: The validity of PSI 11 has improved with recent changes to the code criterion and adoption of clinical documentation improvement programs.


Subject(s)
Health Services Research/methods , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Patient Safety , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Respiratory Insufficiency/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Morbidity/trends , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
4.
J Comp Eff Res ; 8(14): 1239-1251, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436471

ABSTRACT

Aim: To determine whether research funded by the Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) is consistent with the original aims of Congress and unique among other major USA funders. Methods: We compared a sample of funded projects from PCORI, NIH (Phase IV) and agency for healthcare research and quality (AHRQ; American Recovery and Reinvestment Act [ARRA]-based comparative effectiveness research funding) from 2014 to 2018 on number of outcomes/study, patient-centeredness of outcomes (those related to survival, function, symptoms and health-related quality of life) and other features that may characterize patient-centered research (e.g., whether conducted in a real-world setting) using PCORI portfolio data and ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: The mean number of outcomes in PCORI studies (≥9) appeared higher than NIH (≥3)/AHRQ (5.5); a higher percentage of outcomes/study were patient-centered: >85% PCORI versus 50% AHRQ and ≤30% NIH. The majority of PCORI studies (≥74%) were conducted in a real-world setting; this characteristic could not be identified for NIH/AHRQ studies. Conclusion: PCORI-funded studies appear to have unique aspects relative to NIH and AHRQ that are consistent with PCORI's aims of patient-centeredness.


Subject(s)
Academies and Institutes/statistics & numerical data , Patient Outcome Assessment , United States Government Agencies/statistics & numerical data , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
5.
Am J Nephrol ; 50(1): 72-80, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adverse safety events (ASE) during hospitalization may contribute to renal decline or poor outcomes. Understanding factors contributing to ASE in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. The objective is to compare differences and determine predictors of renal pertinent ASE in discharges for CKD. METHOD: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2012 data. The study included adults age ≥18 years with discharge diagnosis for CKD stages 1-4, excluding cancer of the kidney and renal pelvis, renal transplant, end-stage renal disease. Predictors included study sample characteristics, including patient demographics, comorbidity, and hospitalization-related variables. Outcomes assessed included distribution of ASE (angioedema, confusion, muscle weakness or cramps, lower extremity edema (LEE), falls, hypoglycemia, nausea-vomiting-diarrhea (NVD), and skin rash), mean total charge per hospital event, and length-of-stay. The analytical approach used descriptive statistics (means and proportions) and bivariate analysis to compare differences (ASE versus none). Predictors of ASE were explored using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 10.3% of inpatient discharges for CKD showed an ASE. Mean charges (USD 48,072 vs. 46,996), days length-of-stay (6.8 vs. 5.7), number of diagnosis on record (6.8 vs. 5.7), geographical region (Midwest, and West), and type of hospital (rural) were significantly associated with ASE. Most common ASEs were confusion (18%), LEE (21.3%), and NVD (50.7%). Odds of ASE increased for age, female gender, rural hospitals, geographical region, and diagnosis for anemia, coagulopathies, depression, fluid and electrolyte disorders, neurological disorders, psychoses, and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: We identified key factors that increase the risk of ASE in patients with CKD. Opportunities exist to reduce ASE in CKD.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/economics , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
6.
Health Serv Res ; 54(3): 613-622, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30474108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Quality and Safety Review System (QSRS) and the proposed triadic structure for the 11th version of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-11) in their ability to capture adverse events in U.S. hospitals. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: One thousand patient admissions between 2014 and 2016 from three general, acute care hospitals located in Maryland and Washington D.C. STUDY DESIGN: The admissions chosen for the study were a random sample from all three hospitals. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: All 1000 admissions were abstracted through QSRS by one set of Certified Coding Specialists and a different set of coders assigned the draft ICD-11 codes. Previously assigned ICD-10-CM codes for 230 of the admissions were also used. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found less than 20 percent agreement between QSRS and ICD-11 in identifying the same adverse event. The likelihood of a mismatch between QSRS and ICD-11 was almost twice that of a match. The findings were similar to the agreement found between QSRS and ICD-10-CM in identifying the same adverse event. When coders were provided with a list of potential adverse events, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of ICD-11 improved. CONCLUSIONS: While ICD-11 may offer an efficient way of identifying adverse events, our analysis found that in its draft form, it has a limited ability to capture the same types of events as QSRS. Coders may require additional training on identifying adverse events in the chart if ICD-11 is going to prove its maximum benefit.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Hospital Administration/statistics & numerical data , International Classification of Diseases/standards , Patient Harm/statistics & numerical data , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/standards , Adult , Aged , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Middle Aged , Patient Safety/standards , Safety Management/standards , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
7.
Health Serv Res ; 51(3): 1135-51, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26481190

ABSTRACT

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: This study examines small area variations in readmission rates to assess whether higher readmission rate in an area is associated with higher clusters of patients with multiple chronic conditions. STUDY DESIGN: The study uses hospital discharge data of adult (18+) patients in 6 U.S. states for 2009 from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, linked to contextual and provider data from Health Resources and Services Administration. A multivariate cross sectional design at primary care service area (PCSA) level is used. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Adjusting for area characteristics, the readmission rates were significantly higher in PCSAs having higher proportions of patients with 2-3 chronic conditions and those with 4+ chronic conditions, compared with areas with a higher concentration of patients with 0-1 chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Using small area analysis, the study shows that areas with higher concentration of patients with increased comorbid conditions are more likely to have higher readmission rates.


Subject(s)
Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Geographic Mapping , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
8.
Eval Health Prof ; 39(1): 49-64, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25015081

ABSTRACT

This study's purpose was to identify distinct publishing trajectories among 442 participants in three prominent mentored health services research career development programs (Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, and Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality) in the 10 years after award receipt and to examine awardee characteristics associated with different trajectories. Curricula vitae (CVs) of researchers receiving awards between 1991 and 2010 were coded for publications, grants, and awardee characteristics. We found that awardees published at constant or increasing rates despite flat or decreasing rates of first-author publications. Senior-author publications rose concurrently with rates of overall publications. Higher overall publication trajectories were associated with receiving more grants, more citations as measured by the h-index, and more authors per article. Lower trajectory groups were older and had a greater proportion of female awardees. Career development awards supported researchers who generally published successfully, but trajectories varied across individual researchers. Researchers' collaborative efforts produced an increasing number of articles, whereas first author articles were written at a more consistent rate. Career development awards in health services research supported the careers of researchers who published at a high rate; future research should further examine reasons for variation in publishing among early career researchers.


Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Research Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Cooperative Behavior , Humans , Minority Groups , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/statistics & numerical data , Research Support as Topic , Sex Distribution , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data
9.
J Neurointerv Surg ; 7(10): 728-33, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25107470

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No studies have assessed the incidence of craniocervical arterial dissections (CCADs) and its association to mortality in hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of atraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) requiring aneurysmal repair. We hypothesize that the incidence of CCADs in these patients has increased over time as well as its association to mortality. METHODS: We conducted a 9 year retrospective assessment of the incidence of CCADs in patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of an SAH requiring repair and the effect of CCAD on mortality. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we queried records from 2003 to 2011 for an ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases-9) code corresponding to admissions for atraumatic SAH. Demographical data, incidence of CCADs, type of aneurysmal repair, length of hospital stay, and hospital mortality were recorded. Multivariate logistical regression models were fitted to assess for the impact of CCAD on inhospital mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: During the period 2003-2011, of the NIS reported 18,260 patients who required aneurysmal SAH repair, 9737 (53.32%) underwent endovascular coiling and 8523 (46.48%) had surgical clipping. There were 131 patients in the cohort with reported CCADs: 94 (71.75%) of these patients had received endovascular coiling repair and 37 (28.25%) had undergone surgical clipping repair. Patients who underwent endovascular coiling had a higher rate of CCADs in this cohort (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.00 to 4.31, p<0.0001). The incidence of CCADs in this population increased by an average rate of 9.4% per year (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23, p<0.0006), from 0.49% in 2003 to 1.10% in 2011. The diagnosis of CCAD added 3 and 6 more days to median length of hospitalization stay for surgical clipping and endovascular coiling, respectively. The unadjusted rate of mortality was 8.4% in the CCADs subgroup, and the presence of CCAD was not a predictor of mortality in our multivariate regression model (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.27, p=0.2244). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates an annual increase in the incidence of CCADs in patients admitted with SAH who require aneurysmal repair. More than two-thirds of these patients that developed CCADs had undergone endovascular coiling repair. A diagnosis of CCAD increased the length of hospital stay but had no statistically significant association with mortality in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Aortic Dissection/epidemiology , Aortic Dissection/therapy , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Intracranial Aneurysm/epidemiology , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Endovascular Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Intracranial Aneurysm/mortality , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
10.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 90(1): 53-62, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25481833

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To provide a national estimate of the incidence of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures (OFs) in women; compare this with the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and breast cancer; and assess temporal trends in the incidence and length of hospitalizations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all women 55 years and older at the time of admission, admitted to a hospital participating in the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample for an outcome of interest. We performed a retrospective analysis of hospitalizations for OFs (hip, forearm, spine, pelvis, distal femur, wrist, and humerus), MI, stroke, or breast cancer, using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2000-2011. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2011, there were 4.9 million hospitalizations for OF, 2.9 million for MI, 3.0 million for stroke, and 0.7 million for breast cancer. Osteoporotic fractures accounted for more than 40% of the hospitalizations in these 4 outcomes, with an age-adjusted rate of 1124 admissions per 100,000 person-years. In comparison, MI, stroke, and breast cancer had age-adjusted incidence rates of 668, 687, and 151 admissions per 100,000 person-years, respectively. The annual total population facility-related hospital cost was highest for hospitalizations due to OFs ($5.1 billion), followed by MI ($4.3 billion), stroke ($3.0 billion), and breast cancer ($0.5 billion). CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that in US women 55 years and older, the hospitalization burden of OFs and population facility-related hospital cost is greater than that of MI, stroke, or breast cancer. Prioritization of bone health and supporting programs such as fracture liaison services is needed to reduce this substantial burden.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cost of Illness , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization , Myocardial Infarction , Osteoporotic Fractures , Stroke , Age Distribution , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Needs Assessment , Osteoporotic Fractures/classification , Osteoporotic Fractures/economics , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Neurosurg ; 119(6): 1633-40, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23991899

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicators (PSIs) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) are publicly reported metrics used to gauge the quality of health care provided by health care institutions. To better understand the prevalence of these events in hospitalized patients treated for ruptured cerebral aneurysms, the authors determined the incidence rates of PSIs and HACs among patients with a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage and procedure codes for either coiling or clipping in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: The authors queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, part of the AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, for all hospitalizations between 2002 and 2010 involving coiling or clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. The incidence rate of each PSI and HAC was determined by searching the hospital records for ICD-9 codes. The authors used the SAS statistical software package to calculate incidence rates and perform multivariate analyses to determine the effects of patient variables on the probability of developing each indicator. RESULTS: There were 62,972 patient admissions with a diagnosis code of subarachnoid hemorrhage between the years 2002 and 2010; 10,274 (16.3%) underwent clipping and 8248 (13.1%) underwent endovascular coiling. A total of 6547 PSI and HAC events occurred within the 10,274 patients treated with clipping; at least 1 PSI or HAC occurred in 47.9% of these patients. There were 5623 total PSI and HAC events among the 8248 patients treated with coils; at least 1 PSI or HAC occurred in 51.0% of coil-treated patients. Age, sex, comorbidities, hospital size, and hospital type had statistically significant associations with indicator occurrence. Compared with patients without events, those treated by either clipping or coiling and had at least 1 PSI during their hospitalization had significantly longer lengths of stay (p < 0.001), higher hospital costs (p < 0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality rates (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results estimate baseline national rates of PSIs and HACs in patients treated for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. These data may be used to gauge individual institutional quality of care and patient safety metrics in comparison with national data.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured/therapy , Hospitals/standards , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Neurosurgical Procedures/standards , Patient Safety , Adult , Aged , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./standards , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/standards , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
12.
Med Care ; 51(9): 806-11, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23942220

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) 10, "Postoperative Physiologic and Metabolic Derangement" (PPMD), uses administrative data to detect postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis and diabetes-related complications. We sought to evaluate the indicator's criterion validity. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of hospitalization records flagged positive and negative by PSI 10 from a diverse set of 35 hospitals between February 1, 2006 and June 30, 2009. Trained nurse abstractors reviewed medical records. We determined the indicator's sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: Of 94 records flagged by PSI 10 (87 for AKI, 7 for diabetic complications, 1 for both), 69 (73%) involved an accurately coded event; 60 (64%; 95% CI, 46%-79%) represented true PPMD from a clinical perspective. Two of 8 records flagged for diabetic complications were true events. Nineteen false positives involved preoperative renal failure. Three of 230 records flagged negative (enriched with questionably negative records) represented true PPMD. The indicator's sensitivity was 66% (20%-94%), specificity 99.9% (99.5%-100%), and negative predictive value 99.9% (99.4%-100%). Considering dialysis access procedures tantamount to dialysis and excluding records with lower urinary tract obstruction might increase the sensitivity and positive predictive value to 98% (87%-100%) and 72% (50%-87%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PSI 10 mostly concerns AKI and currently has moderate criterion validity, which might improve with increased use of "present on admission" coding, abandonment of the diabetes criteria, and adjustments to the indicator specifications regarding dialysis access and urinary tract obstruction.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Complications/etiology , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , United States
13.
Med Care ; 51(1): 37-44, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23032358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: By focusing primarily on outcomes in the inpatient setting one may overlook serious adverse events that may occur after discharge (eg, readmissions, mortality) as well as opportunities for improving outpatient care. OBJECTIVE: Our overall objective was to examine whether experiencing an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) event in an index medical or surgical hospitalization increased the likelihood of readmission. METHODS: We applied the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PSI software (version 4.1.a) to 2003-2007 Veterans Health Administration inpatient discharge data to generate risk-adjusted PSI rates for 9 individual PSIs and 4 aggregate PSI measures: any PSI event and composite PSIs reflecting "Technical Care," "Continuity of Care," and both surgical and medical care (Mixed). We estimated separate logistic regression models to predict the likelihood of 30-day readmission for individual PSIs, any PSI event, and the 3 composites, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and the occurrence of other PSI(s). RESULTS: The odds of readmission were 23% higher for index hospitalizations with any PSI event compared with those with no event [confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.26], and ranged from 22% higher for Iatrogenic Pneumothorax (CI, 1.03-1.45) to 61% higher for Postoperative Wound Dehiscence (CI, 1.27-2.05). For the composites, the odds of readmission ranged from 15% higher for the Technical Care composite (CI, 1.08-1.22) to 37% higher for the Continuity of Care composite (CI, 1.26-1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that interventions that focus on minimizing preventable inpatient safety events as well as improving coordination of care between and across settings may decrease the likelihood of readmission.


Subject(s)
Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Female , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
14.
BMC Emerg Med ; 12: 15, 2012 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23126473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Length of stay is an important indicator of quality of care in Emergency Departments (ED). This study explores the duration of patients' visits to the ED for which they are treated and released (T&R). METHODS: Retrospective data analysis and multivariate regression analysis were conducted to investigate the duration of T&R ED visits. Duration for each visit was computed by taking the difference between admission and discharge times. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for 2008 were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The mean duration of T&R ED visit was 195.7 minutes. The average duration of ED visits increased from 8 a.m. until noon, then decreased until midnight at which we observed an approximately 70-minute spike in average duration. We found a substantial difference in mean duration of ED visits (over 90 minutes) between Mondays and other weekdays during the transition time from the evening of the day before to the early morning hours. Black / African American patients had a 21.4-minute longer mean duration of visits compared to white patients. The mean duration of visits at teaching hospitals was substantially longer than at non-teaching hospitals (243.8 versus 175.6 minutes). Hospitals with large bed size were associated with longer duration of visits (222.2 minutes) when compared to hospitals with small bed size (172.4 minutes) or those with medium bed size (166.5 minutes). The risk-adjusted results show that mean duration of visits on Mondays are longer by about 4 and 9 percents when compared to mean duration of visits on non-Monday workdays and weekends, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of T&R ED visits varied significantly by admission hour, day of the week, patient volume, patient characteristics, hospital characteristics and area characteristics.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/classification , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Time Factors , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/standards , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24800157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Provide a comparison of health care expenditure estimates for 2007 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA). Reconciling these estimates serves two important purposes. First, it is an important quality assurance exercise for improving and ensuring the integrity of each source's estimates. Second, the reconciliation provides a consistent baseline of health expenditure data for policy simulations. Our results assist researchers to adjust MEPS to be consistent with the NHEA so that the projected costs as well as budgetary and tax implications of any policy change are consistent with national health spending estimates. DATA SOURCES: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the National Health Center for Health Statistics and the National Health Expenditures produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service's Office of the Actuary. RESULTS: In this study, we focus on the personal health care (PHC) sector, which includes the goods and services rendered to treat or prevent a specific disease or condition in an individual. The official 2007 NHEA estimate for PHC spending is $1,915 billion and the MEPS estimate is $1,126 billion. Adjusting the NHEA estimates for differences in underlying populations, covered services, and other measurement concepts reduces the NHEA estimate for 2007 to $1,366 billion. As a result, MEPS is $240 billion, or 17.6 percent, less than the adjusted NHEA total.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
17.
J Manag Care Pharm ; 17(9 Suppl B): S19-24, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22073936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the U.S. government has designated funding of several large-scale initiatives for comparative effectiveness research (CER) in health care. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 apportioned more than $1 billion to support CER programs administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). CER is generally defined as the undertaking of original research or systematic reviews of published literature in order to compare the benefits and risks of different approaches to preventing, diagnosing, or treating diseases. These approaches may include diagnostic tests, medications, medical devices, and surgeries. The overall goals of CER are to support informed health care decisions by patients, clinicians, payers, and policy makers and to apply its evidence to ultimately improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care. OBJECTIVES: To (a) provide managed care professionals with general definitions of CER, specifically as it is administered by AHRQ; (b) discuss the importance of CER to clinical and managed care pharmacists; and (c) summarize key methods and findings from AHRQ's 2007 comparative effectiveness review on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SUMMARY: As supported by AHRQ, CER is conducted in order to synthesize comprehensive evidence on the comparative benefits and harms of treatment interventions. The findings from comparative effectiveness reviews can thus contribute to informing therapeutic strategies and treatment decisions. In 2007, a multitude of RA treatment options and studies motivated AHRQ to commission a systematic comparative effectiveness review. Conducted by investigators at the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center, the review included comparisons of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, synthetic DMARDs versus biologic agents, and various combination therapies. Head-to-head comparisons of synthetic DMARDs generally revealed no significant differences in long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, or in functional capacity or health-related quality of life. Two nonrandomized prospective cohort studies and 1 open-label effectiveness trial reported no differences in ACR20 and ACR50 response rates in patients treated with the tissue necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors etanercept and infliximab. Comparisons of TNF-alpha inhibitors generally indicated no significant differences in rates of adverse events, including serious infections, and no increases in rates over time. In comparisons of a biologic agent combined with methotrexate versus a biologic agent alone, combination therapies were generally associated with better clinical response rates and better outcomes of functional capacity and quality of life. The most common adverse events observed in studies on biologic agents were diarrhea, headache, nausea, rhinitis, injection site reactions, and upper respiratory tract infections.


Subject(s)
Comparative Effectiveness Research/methods , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Comparative Effectiveness Research/organization & administration , Comparative Effectiveness Research/standards , Humans , United States
18.
J Health Care Finance ; 37(2): 56-80, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21294439

ABSTRACT

This study uses longitudinal data of inpatient treatment from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ's) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) to examine the differences in historical trends and build future projections of charges, costs, and lengths of stay (LOS) for inpatient treatment of four of the most prevalent cancer types: breast, colon, lung, and prostate. We stratify our data by hospital ownership type and for the aforementioned four major cancer types. We use the Kruskal Wallis (nonparametric ANOVA) Test and time series models to analyze variance and build projections, respectively, for mean charges per discharge, mean costs per discharge, mean LOS per discharge, mean charges per day, and mean costs per day. We find that significant differences exist in both the mean charges per discharge and mean charges per day for breast, colon, lung, and prostate cancers and in the mean LOS per discharge for breast cancer. Additionally, we find that both mean charges and mean costs are forecast to continue increasing while mean LOS are forecast to continue decreasing over the forecast period 2008 to 2012. The methodologies we employ may be used by individual hospital systems, and by health care policy-makers, for various financial planning purposes. Future studies could examine additional financial and nonfinancial variables for these and other cancer types, test for geographic disparities, or focus on procedural-level hospital measures.


Subject(s)
Economics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Models, Economic , Neoplasms/therapy , Ownership/economics , Health Expenditures , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
19.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 16(5): 281-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19874107

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We investigated the relationship between blindness and vision impairment and access to medical care. METHODS: Pooled data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) years 2002-2004 were used to identify non-institutionalized individuals over the age of 40 with either self-reported blindness, vision impairment, or no vision impairment (n = 40,643). Differences in access to care measures by vision status were assessed, after adjusting for the complex sampling design of the MEPS, using either two-sided z-tests or two-sided t-tests. RESULTS: Individuals with blindness and vision impairment report having more access problems related to cost of care, availability of insurance coverage, transportation issues, and refusal of services by providers, although they do not report lower rates of having a usual source of care compared to those without vision impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that access to care for individuals with blindness and vision impairment is problematic, for reasons that are amenable to policy interventions.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Visually Impaired Persons/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services Research , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Male , Middle Aged , Transportation , Treatment Refusal , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data
20.
Med Care ; 47(12): 1237-43, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19786907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital administrative data are being used to identify patients with postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), either pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). However, few studies have evaluated the accuracy of these ICD-9-CM codes across multiple hospitals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicator (PSI)-12 was used to identify cases with postoperative VTE in 80 hospitals that volunteered for either an AHRQ or University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) validation project. Trained abstractors using a standardized tool and guidelines retrospectively verified all coded VTE events. RESULTS: In the combined samples, the positive predictive value of the set of prespecified VTE codes for any acute VTE at any time during the hospitalization was 451 of 573 = 79% (95% CI: 75%-82%). However, the positive predictive value for acute lower extremity DVT or PE diagnosed after an operation was 209 of 452 = 44% (95% CI: 37%-51%) in the UHC sample and 58 of 121 = 48% (95% CI: 42-67%) in the AHRQ sample. Fourteen percent of all cases had an acute upper extremity DVT, 6% had superficial vein thrombosis and 21% had no acute VTE, however, 61% of the latter had a documented prior/chronic VTE. In the UHC cohort, the sensitivity for any acute VTE was 95.5% (95% CI: 86.4%-100%); the specificity was 99.5% (95% CI: 99.4%-99.7%). CONCLUSION: Current PSI 12 criteria do not accurately identify patients with acute postoperative lower extremity DVT or PE. Modification of the ICD-9-CM codes and implementation of "present on admission" flags should improve the predictive value for clinically important VTE events.


Subject(s)
International Classification of Diseases/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality/statistics & numerical data , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL