Subject(s)
Inventions , Science/organization & administration , Science/trends , United States Government Agencies/organization & administration , Financing, Organized/organization & administration , Financing, Organized/trends , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Internet/history , Inventions/trends , Research Personnel , United States , United States Department of Defense/history , United States Department of Defense/organization & administrationSubject(s)
Military Science/history , Prisoners/history , Prisoners/psychology , Torture/ethics , Torture/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Military Science/ethics , Societies, Scientific/ethics , Societies, Scientific/history , Torture/psychology , United States , United States Department of Defense/ethics , United States Department of Defense/historyABSTRACT
In February 2010, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Michael Mullen established the Comprehensive Review Working Group (CRWG) to conduct a comprehensive review of the issues associated with a repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT). Over the next 10 months, the CRWG undertook one of the most extensive studies of a personnel issue in the history of the U.S. military. This article describes the work and the findings of the CRWG (on which the author served) in the context of the activities within the Department of Defense (DoD) following President Obama's call for DADT repeal in his January 2010 State of the Union Address and leading up to the passage of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act in December 2010. It argues that the CRWG served a number of important functions in the DADT repeal process, particularly that it a) provided a rigorous, fact-based assessment of the impacts of repeal from which DoD senior leaders and Congress could base their views; b) developed a road map for a smooth and orderly implementation of repeal; and c) opened a conversation among military service members about what repeal would really mean to them. In doing so, the CRWG contributed to what has been a largely incident-free and successful transition to a post-DADT military.
Subject(s)
Advisory Committees/history , Homosexuality/history , Military Personnel/history , Social Discrimination/history , United States Department of Defense , Female , History, 21st Century , Homosexuality/psychology , Humans , Male , Military Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Personnel/psychology , Politics , Public Policy , Social Discrimination/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Discrimination/psychology , United States , United States Department of Defense/history , United States Department of Defense/organization & administrationABSTRACT
Placing the costs and process of repeal into the framework of U.S. civil governance and military power reveals the faltering state of civilian control over, and understanding of, contemporary military institutions. The excessive delays, repetitive studies, and lack of judicial oversight that characterized the process of repeal expose a military unmoored from the constitutional and democratic constraints of civilian control. The end of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is more than a civil rights triumph. It is also a lesson in the steep costs and troubling consequences of excessive civilian deference to the armed forces.
