Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 211
Filter
1.
Am J Public Health ; 111(11): 1960-1968, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709856

ABSTRACT

The earliest sickness survey of the US Public Health Service, which started in 1915, was the Service's first socioeconomic study of an industrial community. It was also the first to define illness as a person's inability to work. The survey incorporated the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company's definition of illness, which, instead of sickness rates, focused on duration of illness as a proxy of time lost from work. This kind of survey took place in the broader context of the reform movements of the Progressive Era and the social surveys conducted in the United States, which led to the creation of the Federal Commission on Industrial Relations, where the Service's sickness survey originated. The Service's focus on the socioeconomic classification of families and definition of illness as the inability to work enabled it to show the strong link between poverty and illness among industrial workers. The leader of the survey, Edgar Sydenstricker, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company came up with new ways to measure the health of the population, which also influenced the Service's studies of the effects of the Great Depression on public health and the National Health Survey of 1935-1936. (Am J Public Health. 2021; 111(11):1960-1968. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306454).


Subject(s)
Health Surveys/history , Insurance, Life/history , United States Public Health Service/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , United States
2.
Surgery ; 170(6): 1758-1762, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Surgeon General oversees the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and is viewed as the "Nation's Doctor," responsible for providing the public with information on living healthier and safer lives. The Surgeon General's influence is seen through public health initiatives such as warning labels on tobacco and alcohol products. The objectives of this paper are to describe the tradition of the Office of the Surgeon General as created by Dr John M. Woodworth and to describe the careers of Dr C. Everett Koop and Dr Richard H. Carmona-the only 2 surgeons by training to hold the role. METHODS: This is a historical literature review using a combination of primary and secondary sources. RESULTS: Dr Woodworth set the priorities and responsibilities of the Surgeon General's Office: education, public service, sanitation, and public health. Dr Koop is widely regarded as the most influential Surgeon General of all time. He was both a pioneer in pediatric surgery and a highly influential public figure, issuing landmark reports on smoking, violence, and AIDS. Dr Carmona is a trauma surgeon by training and focused on the dangers of second-hand smoke as Surgeon General. Dr Carmona served in a more political role as Surgeon General, eventually running for Senate at the end of his term. CONCLUSION: This brief review of the history of the Surgeon General's Office highlights the contributions of the first Surgeon General and the only 2 surgeons who have held the position.


Subject(s)
Surgeons/history , United States Public Health Service/organization & administration , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , United States , United States Public Health Service/history
5.
J Emerg Manag ; 16(5): 311-319, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30387851

ABSTRACT

The impact of the Commissioned Corps of the US Public Health Service (Commissioned Corps) on the health and safety of the nation spans more than two centuries. The public health efforts of the highly qualified health professionals of this often-underreported uniformed service include fighting threats like the great flu pandemic of 1918, the anthrax attacks, Ebola, and natural disasters such as Hurricanes Maria, Irma, and Katrina. As we near the first quarter of the twenty-first century, it is important to take a snapshot of the critical contributions and response efforts the Commissioned Corps has made in the first 18 years of the twenty-first century. Today, the Commissioned Corps faces new challenges in the form of emerging diseases and a rapidly growing opioid epidemic, but under the guidance of the US Surgeon General, it remains vigilant and fully capable of minimizing any public health threat it encounters.


Subject(s)
Disasters/history , Disease Outbreaks/history , Terrorism/history , United States Public Health Service/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , United States
8.
P R Health Sci J ; 36(3): 130-139, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28915301

ABSTRACT

The history of the US Public Health Service (PHS) is usually presented in terms of diseases or discoveries; this article examines twenty years' activity in one location. When the United States invaded Puerto Rico in 1898, the Marine Hospital Service (now PHS) took responsibility for foreign quarantine, inspection of immigrants, and medical care for merchant seamen. Its officers evaluated the sanitary conditions of port cities, helped reorganize local disease surveillance and control, and investigated endemic diseases (e.g., hookworm-related anemia) and epidemics (e.g., bubonic plague). After World War I and pandemic influenza, and the greater self-government allowed Puerto Rico by Congress in 1917, PHS officers withdrew from routine local sanitary actions. A narrow geographic focus (Puerto Rico), to examine PHS activity over time (1898 to 1919) provides a richer picture of the agency's impact, and reveals how the sum of disease control activities affected the development of an area's health status and institutions. The duties and, importantly, the personal initiatives of PHS officers in Puerto Rico, such as WW King, produced lasting impact on scientific institutions and administrative, professional, and health care practices.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Public Health/history , United States Public Health Service/history , Delivery of Health Care/history , Epidemics/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Pandemics/history , Puerto Rico , United States
10.
Am J Public Health ; 107(4): 509-516, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28272955

ABSTRACT

Surgeon General Thomas Parran Jr was once viewed as a path-breaking leader, but his legacy is now highly contested. Scholars of national health insurance have viewed Parran as an impediment to government-backed insurance, and revelations about his role in the Tuskegee Study and in the Public Health Service's experiments in Guatemala have cast a shadow over his career. Surgeon General from 1936 to 1948, Parran led the Public Health Service during the development of key features of the modern American health system and was involved in critical debates over the role of the national government in health. I argue that Parran is best understood not as an opponent of insurance but as the proponent of an approach to health policy that sought to link public health and individual medicine. A pragmatic bureaucrat, Parran believed that effective policymaking required compromise with the American Medical Association.


Subject(s)
Health Policy/history , Human Experimentation/history , United States Public Health Service/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Physician Executives/history , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/history , United States
11.
Uisahak ; 26(3): 545-578, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29311536

ABSTRACT

The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male was an observational study on African-American males in Tuskegee, Alabama between 1932 and 1972. The U. S. Public Health Service ran this study on more than 300 people without notifying the participants about their disease nor treating them even after the introduction of penicillin. The study included recording the progress of disease and performing an autopsy on the deaths. This paper explores historical backgrounds enabled this infamous study, and discusses three driving forces behind the Tuskegee Study. First, it is important to understand that the Public Health Service was established in the U. S. Surgeon General's office and was operated as a military organization. Amidst the development of an imperial agenda of the U.S. in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the PHS was responsible for protecting hygiene and the superiority of "the American race" against infectious foreign elements from the borders. The U.S. Army's experience of medical experiments in colonies and abroad was imported back to the country and formed a crucial part of the attitude and philosophy on public health. Secondly, the growing influence of eugenics and racial pathology at the time reinforced discriminative views on minorities. Progressivism was realized in the form of domestic reform and imperial pursuit at the same time. Major medical journals argued that blacks were inclined to have certain defects, especially sexually transmitted diseases like syphilis, because of their prodigal behavior and lack of hygiene. This kind of racial ideas were shared by the PHS officials who were in charge of the Tuskegee Study. Lastly, the PHS officials believed in continuing the experiment regardless of various social changes. They considered that black participants were not only poor but also ignorant of and even unwilling to undergo the treatment. When the exposure of the experiment led to the Senate investigation in 1973, the participating doctors of the PHS maintained that their study offered valuable contribution to the medical research. This paper argues that the combination of the efficiency of military medicine, progressive and imperial racial ideology, and discrimination on African-Americans resulted in the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/history , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/history , Racism/history , Syphilis/history , United States Public Health Service/history , Alabama , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male , Military Medicine/history , Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation/ethics , Research Subjects/history , United States , Withholding Treatment/history
12.
JAAPA ; 29(12): 51-56, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27898554

ABSTRACT

Since 1798, the men and women of the Commissioned Corps of the US Public Health Service (USPHS), one of the seven US uniformed services, have served on the front lines of public health. Two hundred years after the start of the USPHS, the first physician assistant (PA) entered the service to carry on the tradition of protecting, promoting, and advancing the health and safety of the nation. These dedicated clinicians are involved in healthcare delivery to underserved and vulnerable populations, disease control and prevention, biomedical research, food and drug regulation, and national and international response efforts for natural and man-made disasters. This article describes how PAs in the Commissioned Corps of the USPHS have impacted the health and safety of not only the United States but also the international community.


Subject(s)
Physician Assistants/history , United States Public Health Service/history , Delivery of Health Care , Female , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Public Health , United States
14.
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc ; 126: 20-45, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26330657

ABSTRACT

The conquest of pellagra is commonly associated with one name: Joseph Goldberger of the US Public Health Service, who in 1914 went south, concluded within 4 months that the cause was inadequate diet, spent the rest of his life researching the disease, and--before his death from cancer in 1929--found that brewer's yeast could prevent and treat it at nominal cost. It does Goldberger no discredit to emphasize that between 1907 and 1914 a patchwork coalition of asylum superintendents, practicing physicians, local health officials, and others established for the first time an English-language competence in pellagra, sifted through competing hypotheses, and narrowed the choices down to two: an insect-borne infection hypothesis, championed by the flamboyant European Louis Westerna Sambon, and the new "vitamine hypothesis," proffered by Casimir Funk in early 1912 and articulated later that year by two members of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, Fleming Mant Sandwith and Rupert Blue. Those who resisted Goldberger's inconvenient truth that the root cause was southern poverty drew their arguments largely from the Thompson-McFadden Pellagra Commission, which traces back to Sambon's unfortunate influence on American researchers. Thousands died as a result.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/history , Pellagra/history , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , United States Public Health Service/history , Vitamins/history , Dietary Supplements/economics , Health Care Costs , History, 20th Century , Humans , Nutritional Status , Pellagra/diagnosis , Pellagra/mortality , Pellagra/prevention & control , Pellagra/therapy , Poverty/history , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , United States Public Health Service/economics , Vitamins/economics , Vitamins/therapeutic use
15.
J Hist Med Allied Sci ; 70(2): 250-78, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25862749

ABSTRACT

Half a century ago, on January 11, 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General's office released a landmark report on the health consequences of smoking. That report received massive media attention and triggered a steadily growing number of federal, state, and local restrictions on the advertising, sale, and use of cigarettes. Little is known about the report's impact on American public opinion because all the timely public opinion polls that measured the report's impact were privately commissioned by the tobacco industry and were not made publicly available. A review of these polls shows that the 1964 Surgeon General's report had a large and immediate effect on Americans' beliefs that cigarettes were a cause of lung cancer and of heart disease. However, the report had less impact on public preferences for government action or on smoking rates.


Subject(s)
Public Opinion/history , Smoking/history , United States Public Health Service/standards , Attitude to Health , History, 20th Century , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Prevention , United States , United States Public Health Service/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...