Disease and Economic Burden of Hospitalizations Attributable to Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: A Nationwide Study in Brazil.

Diabetes is associated with a significant burden globally. The costs of diabetes-related hospitalizations are unknown in most developing countries. The aim of this study was to estimate the total number and economic burden of hospitalizations attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications in adults from the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System in 2014. Data sources included the National Health Survey (NHS) and National database of Hospitalizations (SIH). We considered diabetes, its microvascular (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and macrovascular complications (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease), respiratory and urinary tract infections, as well as selected cancers. Assuming that DM patients are hospitalized for these conditions more frequently that non-DM individuals, we estimated the etiological fraction of each condition related to DM, using the attributable risk methodology. We present number, average cost per case, and overall costs of hospitalizations attributable to DM in Brazil in 2014, stratified by condition, state of the country, gender and age group. In 2014, a total of 313,273 hospitalizations due to diabetes in adults were reported in Brazil (4.6% of total adult hospitalization), totaling (international dollar) Int$264.9 million. The average cost of an adult hospitalization due to diabetes was Int$845, 19% higher than hospitalization without DM. Hospitalizations due to cardiovascular diseases related to diabetes accounted for the higher proportion of costs (47.9%), followed by microvascular complications (25.4%) and DM per se (18.1%). Understanding the costs of diabetes and its major complications is crucial to raise awareness and to support the decision-making process on policy implementation, also allowing the assessment of prevention and control strategies.

Hospitalization costs of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy: 5-year experience.

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate over certain aspects of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) over open appendectomy (OA) in regard to hospitalization costs and associated complications. METHODS: A database was used to obtain the charts for either LA or OA performed during a 5-year period. Variables analyzed were age, gender, hospitalization cost, length of stay and complications. RESULTS: Of 1792 appendectomies performed, 633 (35.3%) were OA and 1159 (64.6%) were LA. Both groups were statistically similar with regard to gender (p = 0.075) but differed with respect to age, demonstrating an older patient population in the LA group (p <0.0001). Length of stay was significantly higher in the OA group (3.33 vs. 2.52) days, p <0.0001). The overall hospitalization cost of LA was 25% higher than the OA cost (p = 0.0005). The cost of an uncomplicated LA case was 1.7 times higher than in the OA group (p ≤ 0.0001). We found no statistically significant differences between the hospitalization cost of an OA and LA group when both procedures were associated with a complication (p = 0.5319). A higher complication rate was observed in the OA group, 60 cases (9.47%) as compared to the LA group, 46 cases (3.96%), p <0.0001. The increased rate of complications observed was related to cardiovascular, wound and infectious problems. CONCLUSIONS: Noncomplicated LA was associated with a higher hospitalization cost. There was no difference with regard to complicated cases. The incidence of complications increased in the OA group.