Transurethral versus suprapubic catheterization to test urethral function in rats.

Transurethral and suprapubic catheterization have both been used to test urethral function in rats; however, it is unknown whether these methods affect urethral function or if the order of catheterization affects the results. The aim of this cross-over designed experiment was to compare the effects of catheterization methods and order on leak point pressure (LPP) testing. LPP and simultaneous external urethral sphincter electromyography (EUS EMG) were recorded in anesthetized female virgin Sprague-Dawley rats in a cross-over design to test the effects of transurethral and suprapubic catheterization. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure during LPP testing whether measured with a transurethral or suprapubic catheter. There was no significant difference in peak bladder pressure between the first and second catheter insertions. However, peak EMG firing rate, as well as peak EMG amplitude and EMG amplitude difference between peak and baseline were significantly higher after the first catheter insertion compared to the second insertion, regardless of the catheter method. Our results suggest that route of catheterization does not alter urethral function, e.g. create a functional partial outlet obstruction. Either catheterization method could be used for LPP and/or EUS EMG testing in rats.

[Urology]. / Urologie.

Over the last year, urologic progress remains driven by the quick technologic evolution, with a focus on Laser and robotics. The latter appears to potentially contribute to the drift towards ambulatory surgery, in particular for distinct sub-populations harbouring kidney or prostate cancer. The Da Vinci robot appears also to increase the drive towards minimally invasiveness with respect to female incontinence and the laparoscopic placement of an artificial urethral sphincter. Last, a new Laser is in the midst to offer its polyvalence in terms of endoscopic stone surgery, so as that of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Facing this technologic pressure, it remains of utmost importance to scrupulously validate on a short so as longer-term basis the true hoped advantages.

Les progrès urologiques de cette dernière année restent, comme l'année précédente, sous le sceau des rapides avancées technologiques, notamment celles du laser et de la robotique. Cette dernière va contribuer à faire évoluer la chirurgie ambulatoire, notamment pour certaines interventions et sous-populations de malades porteurs d'un cancer du rein ou de la prostate. Elle est également en train d'exercer une nouvelle percée dans le domaine de l'incontinence féminine, en ce qui concerne la mise en place du sphincter urétral artificiel. Enfin, un nouveau laser est sur le point d'offrir sa polyvalence en termes de chirurgie endoscopique lithiasique ainsi que celle de l'hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate. Face à cette pression technologique, il faut rigoureusement valider à court et moyen termes les véritables avantages espérés.

Expert and Crowdsourced Evaluation of Image Quality From a Novel Endoscopy Phone Light Adapter.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the image quality of cystourethroscopy using a novel 3D printed phone light adapter with subject expert and crowdsourced evaluators. METHODS: A simple 3D printed light adaptor for a flexible cystoscopy was developed and made open source. Two videos were then recorded of a simulated cystourethroscopy, one using the novel adapter and the other using a traditional endoscopy light source. Expert evaluators (urology trainees and attendings) were then asked to evaluate the video quality using a double stimulus impairment scale. They were also asked to rate their level of confidence in using the novel adapter in clinical scenarios. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk marketplace, 100 crowdsourced evaluators viewed the same videos and completed the same rating scale. The Mann-Whitney U test was then used to compare the expert and crowdsourced ratings. RESULTS: Expert and crowdsourced evaluators saw minimal degradation of video quality for the simulated urethroscopy (P= .66). However, while expert evaluators did identify degradation in the cystoscopy video, the crowdsourced evaluators did not (P = .012). 96% of the expert evaluators would either "often" or "always" use the novel adapter for difficult Foley placements and removal of ureteric stents. CONCLUSION: The novel light adapter caused minimal degradation in image quality for urethroscopy as compared to a traditional endoscopy light source, with vast majority of raters believing it would be adequate to perform common bedside cystoscopy procedures.

Knowing the inside of a laser / Conocer la parte interna del láser

"Theatre acting is the operation with a scalpel, movie acting is an operation with a laser". Michael Caine. Being the instrument in hands of urologist laser is much more than a single-application device. Its applicability is deeply dependent on physical properties, settings, and environment. With knowledge of how the device work, why it affects the tissue, and how this laser-tissue interaction goes surgeon can shape further clinical work to choose the best devices or techniques of surgery. Tailoring the laser effects on the needs of the patient. In this paper, we tried to briefly describe what a laser device consists of, the most important laser-tissue interactions that are necessary for understanding the operation of the laser, and the main laser systems that are used in urology

Michael Caine dijo que las actuaciones de quirófano son con bisturí y las actuaciones en películas son con láser. En manos de urólogos, el láser es mucho más que una técnica. Su aplicabilidad depende de las habilidades físicas, la disposición de los elementos y el ambiente. El conocimiento del láser permite al cirujano escoger la técnica correcta para cada caso. En este manuscrito, describimos en qué consiste el láser, las interacciones con el tejido y los principales tipos de láser en urología

Experimental Studies of Nonabsorbable Polymeric Surgical Clips for Use in Urologic Laparoscopy.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the stability of the Click'aV® (Grena®), Click'aV plus (Grena), and Hem-o-lok® (Weck®, Teleflex®) polymer clips and the evaluation of the clips stability on a complete porcine artery. Materials and Methods: A dynamometer with a custom support and clamp unit was used. The crank gradually increased the tension force being applied on the clip via the suture. Different directions for the application of the force were tested. The highest force before the start of slipping the suture was noted. The procedure was repeated three times for each ligating clip. Results: For transverse stability, the "XL-size" Grena Click'aV Plus required preventing slippage at a greater force compared to the Hem-o-lok (p = 0.0071). No significant differences found statistically between the Grena Click'aV and Hem-o-lok clips (p = 0.1). For longitudinal stability, the Hem-o-lok required a significantly higher force to be opened compared to the Click'aV (p = 0.0036), but no statistically significant difference was found compared to the Click'aV Plus (p = 0.1). Concerning porcine artery stability, the artery slipped through the Click'aV clip in both measurements at a force of 10.2 and 9.4 N. In contrast, the arteries were cut in all measurements using the Click'aV Plus and the Hem-o-lok clips at forces of 11.8 and 12.8 N and 12.9 and 14.2 N, respectively. None of the clips leaked with up to 300 mm Hg of intra-arterial pressure applied to porcine renal arteries. Conclusions: The Grena Click'aV Plus clip has similar performance to the Hem-o-lok clip, and this clip can be equally useful for ligating vessels in laparoscopic urologic surgeries. We believe, from our findings in this study as well as those from other reports, that vascular clips applied properly by experienced surgeons provide a safe, reliable, and considerable cost-saving option for vascular control in urologic laparoscopic surgery.

The Two-Point Technique for Fluoroscopic-Guided Endoscopic Procedures in Urology: A Validation Study.

Introduction: The widespread use of diagnostic and therapeutic ionizing radiation raises concerns regarding excessive occupational and patient exposure. In this study, we test a novel fluoroscopic technique that has the potential to minimize radiation dose during urologic procedures. Materials and Methods: A prospective evaluation of all patients undergoing endoscopic urologic procedures in our institution was conducted. A "two-point technique (TPT)" is described in which the fluoroscope image intensifier (c-arm) is shifted between caudal and cephalad set points of the operative field. We wished to determine whether patient radiation exposure was lower with TPT than with a non-structured conventional technique, referred to as the cognitive fluoroscopic technique (CFT), in which the manipulation of the c-arm was at the discretion of the user. We obtained all clinical, radiographic, and fluoroscopic data of patients in the study period and used unpaired nonparametric statistical analysis of univariates entered stepwise into a logistic regression model. Results: A total of 106 endoscopic urologic procedures from January 2016 to November 2018 were reviewed. Forty-four (41.5%) cases were performed using TPT and 62 (58.5%) using CFT. The mean fluoroscopy time of TPT vs CFT was 71.1 (±60.8) seconds vs 104.5 (±91.6) seconds, respectively (p = 0.04), and the mean radiation dose on TPT vs CFT was 11.6 (±10.6) mGy vs 20.3 (±24.3) mGy, respectively (p = 0.03). TPT was an independent predictor of reduced operative room (OR) time and fluoro time (p < 0.05), while body mass index, age, and operator were not. Conclusion: The "TPT" helps reducing radiation dose and fluoroscopic time during endoscopic urologic procedures. The TPT is useful to lower radiation exposure to patients and OR staff.

[The future of laparoscopy and robotics in urology]. / Zukunft der Laparoskopie und Robotik in der Urologie.

The introduction of robotics led to a decrease in the importance of classical laparoscopy. Nevertheless laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy underwent significant technological improvements during the last decade, including introduction of 4k Ultra HD video technology, 3D-HD-videosystems, minaturised instruments, advanced sealing devices, instruments with 7 degrees of freedom, and ergonomic platforms Ethos Chair®. The monopoly of robotic surgical devices will end in 2019, because key patents of Intuitive Surgical will expire. This will lead to an interesing competition among new manufacturers of robotic surgical devices, which however have to prove that they meet the high quality standard of the current da Vinci series, such as type of console, arrangement of robotic arms, technology of 3D-videosystem, and quality and degrees of freedom of end effectors. There are also robotic systems used in endourology: Avicenna Roboflex® and the AquaBeam®-System for robot-assisted aquablation therapy of the prostate. While Roboflex improves the ergonomics of flexbile ureteroscopy, AquaBeam may for the first time eliminate the surgeon.

Current Use of and Indications for Robot-assisted Surgery in Paediatric Urology.

The use of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) by paediatric urologists is increasing. This mini review looks at the current status of RAS in paediatric urology. The challenges involved in RAS use in children are reviewed, as well as the indications for and feasibility of procedures performed and, where possible, outcomes with RAS. PATIENT SUMMARY: The current status of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in paediatric urology, together with the challenges in using RAS for children is outlined in this mini review. Innovative adaptation has pushed the boundaries as regards the feasibility of RAS procedures in children with good outcomes.

Resistance of different guidewires to laser injury: an in-vitro experiment.

BACKGROUND: In urology, lasers are used in a variety of endoscopic procedures such as ureteroscopy and retrograde renal surgery for stone fragmentation of urinary calculi and ablation of urothelial tumors. To perform these procedures, guidewires are used as a preliminary safe-mainstay for referencing the urinary tract. This study aims to determine the effect of two different lasers: holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium:YAG (Tm:YAG) lasers on metal guidewires with PTFE coating (PTFE), nitinol guidewires with hydrophilic coating (Hydrophilic) and nitinol guidewires with hydrophilic listed coating (Zebra). METHODS: Different combinations of frequency (5, 10 and 12 Hz) and energy per pulse (0.5, 1.5, and 2.6 J) of Ho:YAG laser were applied on the three kinds of guidewires in two experiments (50 J vs. 100 J of total energy). For the Tm:YAG laser three power levels (5, 35, and 70 W) with a total energy of 100 J were applied to the guidewires. The degree of damage (0 to 5) of the guidewire was assessed after each laser application. RESULTS: A higher degree of injury of guidewires was related to higher values of total energy used for the Ho:YAG laser (P=0.036), and to higher values of power applied with the Tm:YAG (P=0.051). The most resistant guidewire to Ho:YAG laser energy was Zebra, followed by PTFE and Hydrophilic (P<0.001). With the Tm:YAG laser, PTFE guidewire appears to be the most resistant and the Hydrophilic the most fragile, although without reaching the statistical significance (P=0.223). CONCLUSIONS: Both lasers revealed a harmful effect on the three tested guidewires. There was an association between the degree of injury and the amount of Ho:YAG laser energy and Tm:YAG laser power. The guidewire Zebra proved to be the safest when using Ho:YAG laser and the PTFE guidewire the most resistant to laser Tm:YAG. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Minilaparoscopia en urología: revisión sistemática / Minilaparoscopy in urology: Systematic review

Contexto: En los últimos años las intervenciones urológicas por minilaparoscopia (ML) han experimentado un auge. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión sistemática de la evidencia publicada sobre la ML y su papel actual en la urología. Adquisición de evidencia: Se realizó una búsqueda en Medline desde octubre 1983 hasta diciembre de 2016 siguiendo los criterios PRISMA. Un total de 6 artículos comparativos y 13 series fueron seleccionadas para este manuscrito. Síntesis de evidencia: Tan solo un estudio fue aleatorizado, 4 estudios fueron prospectivos y comparativos y la mayor parte fueron series de casos intervenidos con instrumental de 3mm. La intervención más frecuente fue la adrenalectomía, seguida de la nefrectomía, donante vivo y pieloplastia. Además se operaron otras enfermedades menores como decorticaciones quísticas, pielolitotomías, linfadenectomías, varicocelectomías u orquiectomías. Discusión: En los últimos años ha habido importantes mejoras técnicas en el material de ML. La mayoría de los procedimientos fueron de cirugía reconstructiva y por abordaje transperitoneal, incrementándose paulatinamente el número de casos de cirugía oncológica. Solo un 36,8% de las series evaluaron los resultados cosméticos con cuestionarios validados y un 68,4% de los estudios emplearon la escala visual analógica para medir el dolor postoperatorio. Conclusiones: El nivel de evidencia de la mayoría de los estudios publicados es bajo. La ML es una técnica reproducible para la cirugía urológica y segura incluso para las intervenciones de grandes masas quirúrgicas. Sus resultados cosméticos y de dolor postoperatorio son superiores a los de la laparoscopia convencional, si bien estas conclusiones deben ser tomadas con cautela dadas las limitaciones de los estudios actuales

Context: There has been a boom in recent years in urological procedures using minilaparoscopy (ML). Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the published evidence on ML and its current role in urology. Acquisition of evidence: We performed a search on MedLine spanning October 1983 to December 2016 according to PRISMA criteria. A total of 6 comparative articles and 13 series were selected for this manuscript. Summary of the evidence: Only 1 study was randomised, 4 studies were prospective and comparative, and most were case series in which the operations were performed with 3-mm instruments. The most common procedures were adrenalectomy, followed by nephrectomy, living donor and pyeloplasty. Other minor conditions were also operated on, including cyst decortications, pyelolithotomies, lymphadenectomies, varicocelectomies and orchiectomies. Discussion: There have been significant technical improvements in recent years in the materials of ML. Most procedures were for reconstructive surgery and by transperitoneal approach, with a gradually increasing number of cases of oncologic surgery. Only 36.8% of the series assessed the cosmetic results with validated questionnaires, and 68.4% of the studies used the visual analogue scale to measure pain during the postoperative period. Conclusions: The level of evidence of most published studies is low. ML is a reproducible technique for urological surgery and is safe even for operations on large surgical masses. The procedure's cosmetic and pain results after surgery are superior to those of conventional laparoscopy, although these conclusions should be taken with caution given the limitations of the current studies

Engaging telehealth to drive value-based urology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Telehealth, or the remote delivery of healthcare services using telecommunications technology, has the potential to revolutionize the delivery of healthcare and contribute to ongoing efforts to provide high-value care. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss several categories of telehealth that have been applied to healthcare. Several of these approaches, in particular video visits and teleconsultations, have promising early data demonstrating the significant benefits of telehealth technology with respect to the quality of care, access, cost savings, and patient experience. Nonetheless, considerable knowledge gaps still exist regarding how and for which patients and diseases telehealth modalities should be applied. Finally, we discuss the barriers to widespread adoption at the institutional, state, and federal levels. SUMMARY: Maximizing the value of healthcare is an important goal for hospitals, physicians, and policymakers. Telehealth leverages advances in technology and the widespread availability of telecommunications devices to make healthcare communication more available, more convenient, and more efficient for patients and providers. With appropriate policies and incentives, telehealth initiatives can improve the value of urologic care and smooth the transition to a value-based healthcare system.

Is There a Role for Double J Stent Culture in Contemporary Urology?

INTRODUCTION: To present the incidence of bacterial colonization on ureteral double J stents (DJS); isolate the uropathogens; define the rate of multi-resistant bacteria strains (MRBS) and present their clinical importance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The whole body of 105 DJSs was examined for the presence of uropathogens. RESULTS: The main etiology for stent placement was lithiasis (57.1%). The most frequently cultured microorganisms were staphylococcus (28.6%). Forty-four stents hosted MRBS. 25 (23.8%), 10 (9.5%) and 8 (7.6%) of the patients were affected by malignancy, diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure respectively. Apart from the female gender, none of the examined factors (age, duration of stenting and chronic diseases) was correlated with the colonization or the presence of MRBS. Eleven of the 61 stented patients (18%) who were operated upon developed a febrile urinary tract infections (UTI). In 7 of them the stent hosted MRBS (63.6%). After taking into consideration the sensitivity report, we altered our initial empirical antibacterial prophylaxis to targeted antibacterial treatment in the patients with MRBS with rapid remission of their infection and no urosepsis event. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of bacteriologic flora of DJS can be very helpful in an evidence-based prophylactic and therapeutic practice. Stent examination could be recommended in high-risk cases of developing UTI and sepsis after a urologic operation.

Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.

PURPOSE: There are no comparative assessments on the environmental impact of endourologic instruments. We evaluated and compared the environmental impact of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with reusable flexible ureteroscopes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An analysis of the typical life cycle of the LithoVue™ (Boston Scientific) single-use digital flexible ureteroscope and Olympus Flexible Video Ureteroscope (URV-F) was performed. To measure the carbon footprint, data were obtained on manufacturing of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and from typical uses obtained with a reusable scope, including repairs, replacement instruments, and ultimate disposal of both ureteroscopes. The solid waste generated (kg) and energy consumed (kWh) during each case were quantified and converted into their equivalent mass of carbon dioxide (kg of CO2) released. RESULTS: Flexible ureteroscopic raw materials composed of plastic (90%), steel (4%), electronics (4%), and rubber (2%). The manufacturing cost of a flexible ureteroscope was 11.49 kg of CO2 per 1 kg of ureteroscope. The weight of the single-use LithoVue and URV-F flexible ureteroscope was 0.3 and 1 kg, respectively. The total carbon footprint of the lifecycle assessment of the LithoVue was 4.43 kg of CO2 per endourologic case. The total carbon footprint of the lifecycle of the reusable ureteroscope was 4.47 kg of CO2 per case. CONCLUSION: The environmental impacts of the reusable flexible ureteroscope and the single-use flexible ureteroscope are comparable. Urologists should be aware that the typical life cycle of urologic instruments is a concerning source of environmental emissions.

Updates in Urologic Robot Assisted Surgery.

Modern robotics is an advanced minimally invasive technology with the advantages of wristed capability, three-dimensional optics, and tremor filtration compared with conventional laparoscopy. Urologists have been early adopters of robotic surgical technology: robotics have been used in urologic oncology for more than 20 years and there has been an increasing trend for utilization in benign urologic pathology in the last couple of years. The continuing development and interest in robotics are aimed at surgical efficiency as well as patient outcomes. However, despite its advantages, improvements in haptics, system size, and cost are still desired. This article explores the current use of robotics in urology as well as future improvements on the horizon.

Testing Smart Glasses in urology: Clinical and surgical potential applications. / Evaluación del uso de smart glasses en urología: potenciales aplicaciones en los ámbitos hospitalario y quirúrgico.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the potential benefits of using smart glasses - wearable computer optical devices with touch-less command features - in the surgery room and in outpatient care settings in urology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April and November 2015, 80 urologists were invited to use Google Glass in their daily surgical and clinical practice, and to share them with other urologists. Participants rated the usefulness of smart glasses on a 10-point scale, and provided insights on their potential benefits in a telephone interview. RESULTS: During the testing period, 240 urologists used smart glasses, and the 80 initially invited rated their usefulness. Mean scores for usefulness in the surgery room and in outpatient clinics were 7.4 and 5.4, respectively. The interview revealed that the applications of smart glasses considered most promising in surgery were live video streaming and static image playback, augmented reality, laparoscopic navigation, and digital checklist for safety verification. In outpatient settings, participants considered the glasses useful as a viewing platform for sharing test results, for browsing digital vademecum, and for checking medical records in emergency situations. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists engaged in our experience identified various uses of smart glasses with potential benefits for physician's daily practice, particularly in the urological surgery setting. Further quantitative studies are needed to exploit the actual possibilities of smart glasses and address the technical limitations for their safe use in clinical and surgical practice.

Motion control skill assessment based on kinematic analysis of robotic end-effector movements.

BACKGROUND: The performance of robotic end-effector movements can reflect the user's operation skill difference in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. This study quantified the trade-off of speed-accuracy-stability by kinematic analysis of robotic end-effector movements to assess the motion control skill of users with different levels of experience. METHODS: Using 'MicroHand S' system, 10 experts, 10 residents and 10 novices performed single-hand test and bimanual coordination test. Eight metrics based on the movements of robotic end-effectors were applied to evaluate the users' performance. RESULTS: In the single-hand test, experts outperformed other groups except for movement speed; in the bimanual coordination test, experts also performed better except for movement time and movement speed. No statistically significant difference in performance was found between residents and novices. CONCLUSIONS: The kinematic differences obtained from the movements of robotic end-effectors can be applied to assess the motion control skill of users with different skill levels.

[Application of 3D printing in urology].

The purpose of this article is to outline the role and possible applications of 3D printing in urology. At present, this technique provides the opportunity to choose the individual strategy of patient management, to conduct preoperative planning and surgical rehearsal; for medical specialists to reduce the learning curve in mastering modern complex surgical techniques, and for doctors and students to improve understanding of pathological processes in the kidney and the prostate gland.

A urologic stethoscope? Urologist performed sonography using a pocket-size ultrasound device in the point-of-care setting.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound is commonly used in urology. Technical advances with reduced size and cost led to diffusion of small ultrasound devices to many clinical settings. Even so, most ultrasound studies are performed by non-urologists. We aimed to evaluate the utility of a pocket-size ultrasound device (Vscan™ GE Healthcare) and the quality of urologist performed study. METHODS: Three consecutive studies were performed: (1) a urologist using the pocket ultrasound, (2) a sonographist using the pocket ultrasound, and (3) a sonographist using a standard ultrasound device. Thirty-six patients were evaluated with a basic urologic ultrasound study. An excepted deviation between studies was preset for numeric parameters and t test performed. Ordinal parameters were analyzed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Kidney length, renal pelvis length, renal cyst diameter, post-void residual and prostate volume (transabdominal) differences were found to be insignificant when comparing a urologist pocket ultrasound study to a sonographist standard ultrasound study (P = 0.15; P = 0.21; P = 0.81; P = 0.32; P = 0.07, respectively). Hydronpehrosis evaluation (none, mild, moderate and severe) and the presence of ureteral jet signs conferred a high inter-observer agreement when comparing the above studies using the Cohen's kappa coefficient (K = 0.63; K = 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Urologist performed pocket ultrasound study is valid in evaluating the upper and lower urinary tract and is practical in many clinical scenarios. The urologic stethoscope is now becoming a reality within reach.

Gastroenterology-Urology Devices; Manual Gastroenterology-Urology Surgical Instruments and Accessories. Final rule; technical amendment.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the identification of manual gastroenterology-urology surgical instruments and accessories to reflect that the device does not include specialized surgical instrumentation for use with urogyencologic surgical mesh specifically intended for use as an aid in the insertion, placement, fixation, or anchoring of surgical mesh during urogynecologic procedures ("specialized surgical instrumentation for use with urogynecologic surgical mesh"). These amendments are being made to reflect changes made in the recently issued final reclassification order for specialized surgical instrumentation for use with urogynecologic surgical mesh.