ABSTRACT
Introducción. La urticaria crónica es una afección inflamatoria de la piel caracterizada por presencia de habones evanescentes y/o angioedema, que ocurren durante un período ≥ 6 semanas. Objetivo. Determinar la prevalencia de esta enfermedad y describir características clínicas en niños y adolescentes menores de 19 años de un hospital general. Población y métodos. Estudio corte transversal, realizado entre el 2015 y el 2020, en una población de niños y adolescentes de un sistema de salud privado. Resultados. Se revisaron 1567 historias clínicas de pacientes con urticaria atendidos durante el período de estudio. Se identificaron 36 pacientes con urticaria crónica; se estableció una prevalencia del 0,16 % (IC95% 0,11-0,22). Conclusión. La prevalencia de urticaria crónica en niños y adolescentes fue del 0,16 %. Se observó mayor frecuencia en el sexo femenino y adolescentes.
Introduction. Chronic urticaria is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by the presence of evanescent wheals or angioedema that last for ≥ 6 weeks. Objective. To determine the prevalence of urticaria and describe its clinical characteristics in children and adolescents under 19 years of age in a general hospital. Population and methods. This was a cross-sectional study carried out between 2015 and 2020 in a population of children and adolescents seen at a private healthcare facility. Results. A total of 1567 medical records of patients with urticaria seen during the study period were reviewed. Thirty-six patients with chronic urticaria were identified; the prevalence was 0.16% (95% CI: 0.110.22). Conclusion. The prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adolescents was 0.16%. A higher frequency was observed among girls and adolescents.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Chronic Urticaria/epidemiology , Hospitals, General , Urticaria/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera stings can produce IgE-mediated reactions, toxic reactions, or atypical reactions, which are rare. Cold urticaria has been described among the cutaneous manifestations in the atypical ones, but there is only one case of chronic urticaria. CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old female patient experienced palmoplantar pruritus and generalized urticaria 60 minutes after two vespid stings, requiring medical assistance and several cycles of home treatment with oral antihistamines and corticosteroids for resolution in 12 weeks. Allergological studies showed normal tryptase and primary sensitization to Polistes dominula venom. Given the patient's profession, venom immunotherapy was started with Polistes dominula 100% without recurrence of urticaria after its administration. CONCLUSIONS: We present a case of IgE-mediated systemic reaction followed by self-limited chronic urticaria, related chronologically to the same vespid sting trigger.
ANTECEDENTES: La picadura de himenópteros puede producir reacciones mediadas por IgE, reacciones tóxicas o reacciones atípicas poco frecuentes. Dentro de las manifestaciones cutáneas por reacciones atípicas se incluye urticaria por frío, y sólo existe un informe de caso de urticaria crónica. REPORTE DE CASO: Paciente femenina de 56 años, quien 60 minutos después de recibir dos picaduras de véspidos manifestó prurito palmoplantar y urticaria generalizada, precisando asistencia sanitaria y varios ciclos de tratamiento domiciliario con antihistamínicos y corticosteroides por vía oral, con curación completa luego de 12 semanas. El estudio alergológico reportó: concentración de triptasa normal y sensibilización primaria al veneno de Polistes dominula. Debido a la profesión de la paciente se inició inmunoterapia con veneno de Polistes dominula al 100%, sin recurrencia de la urticaria después de la administración. CONCLUSIÓN: El caso aquí expuesto combina una reacción sistémica mediada por IgE seguida de urticaria crónica, de curso autolimitado, cronológicamente relacionada con el mismo desencadenante (picadura de véspidos).
Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Insect Bites and Stings , Female , Middle Aged , Humans , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Chronic Urticaria/etiology , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Animals , Wasp Venoms/adverse effects , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Wasps , Urticaria/etiologyABSTRACT
In rare instances, patients with SLE may exhibit atypical clinical manifestations, such as Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis, which can pose diagnostic challenges. Here, we present a case report of a 28-year-old female with a history of SLE with lupus nephritis clase IV who developed HUV-like symptoms, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of C1q Vasculitis. This case underscores the importance of considering C1q Vasculitis in SLE patients presenting with HUV-like features and highlights Rituximab as a promising therapeutic option for managing this rare condition.
Subject(s)
Complement C1q , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Rituximab , Urticaria , Vasculitis , Humans , Female , Adult , Complement C1q/deficiency , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Vasculitis/diagnosis , Vasculitis/drug therapy , Urticaria/diagnosis , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Lupus Nephritis/complications , Lupus Nephritis/drug therapy , Diagnosis, DifferentialABSTRACT
Introduction. Chronic urticaria is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by the presence of evanescent wheals or angioedema that last for ≥ 6 weeks. Objective. To determine the prevalence of urticaria and describe its clinical characteristics in children and adolescents under 19 years of age in a general hospital. Population and methods. This was a cross-sectional study carried out between 2015 and 2020 in a population of children and adolescents seen at a private healthcare facility. Results. A total of 1567 medical records of patients with urticaria seen during the study period were reviewed. Thirty-six patients with chronic urticaria were identified; the prevalence was 0.16% (95% CI: 0.11-0.22). Conclusion. The prevalence of chronic urticaria in children and adolescents was 0.16%. A higher frequency was observed among girls and adolescents.
Introducción. La urticaria crónica es una afección inflamatoria de la piel caracterizada por presencia de habones evanescentes y/o angioedema, que ocurren durante un período ≥ 6 semanas. Objetivo. Determinar la prevalencia de esta enfermedad y describir características clínicas en niños y adolescentes menores de 19 años de un hospital general. Población y métodos. Estudio corte transversal, realizado entre el 2015 y el 2020, en una población de niños y adolescentes de un sistema de salud privado. Resultados. Se revisaron 1567 historias clínicas de pacientes con urticaria atendidos durante el período de estudio. Se identificaron 36 pacientes con urticaria crónica; se estableció una prevalencia del 0,16 % (IC95% 0,11-0,22). Conclusión. La prevalencia de urticaria crónica en niños y adolescentes fue del 0,16 %. Se observó mayor frecuencia en el sexo femenino y adolescentes.
Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Hospitals, General , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Adolescent , Male , Child , Prevalence , Chronic Urticaria/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Infant , Urticaria/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Early detection of CSU patients with low probability of a clinical response with antihistamines could undergo prompt initiation of therapeutic alternatives. The aim of the study was to develop and internally validate a model for predicting the clinical response to antihistamines in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who consult allergology and dermatology care centers. A cohort of CSU patients, recruited from four participating centers, were followed up for 12 months. Fifteen candidate variables were selected to be included in the multivariate model and then internal validation was done with bootstrap analysis with 1000 simulations. The outcome variable, clinical response to antihistamines, was evaluated with the UAS (Urticaria Activity Score) scale for seven days: "No response to antihistamines" was defined as UAS7 ≥7 points after at least one month with a maximum dose of antihistamines, while "Response to antiH1" was defined as UAS7 ≤6 points for at least three months with the use of antiH1. A total of 790 patients were included. Among the different models analyzed, the model that included age, angioedema, anxiety/depression, time with the disease, NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) intolerance, and UAS7 baseline was considered the one with the best performance (accuracy 0.675, HL 0.87, AUC 0.727). The internal validation analyses demonstrated good consistency of the model. In conclusion, this prediction model identifies the probability of response to antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. The model could be useful for a personalized therapeutic approach according to individual patient risk.
Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents , Chronic Urticaria , Urticaria , Adult , Humans , Chronic Disease , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen has been established as the first-line treatment for pediatric patients with viral warts. Cold-induced urticaria (CU) is a rare skin reaction triggered by cold stimuli. We present the case of a pediatric patient with viral warts who developed CU after receiving cryotherapy.
Subject(s)
Cold Urticaria , Urticaria , Warts , Humans , Child , Cryotherapy/adverse effects , Warts/etiology , Warts/therapy , Nitrogen , Urticaria/etiology , Urticaria/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Desde su aparición en Wuhan, China, y luego de más de dos años de ser declarada como pandemia, la COVID-19 ha provocado más de cinco millones de muertes en el mundo. Es ampliamente conocido que no solo afecta al sistema respiratorio, sino que aparecen manifestaciones digestivas, cardiovasculares, endocrinometabólicas, neurológicas, renales y cutáneas. El espectro dermatológico que guarda relación con la COVID-19 se ha definido en cinco grupos principales de manifestaciones: lesiones maculopapulares, lesiones acrales, patrón urticariforme, patrón vesiculoso y lesiones de livedo o necrosis, según su frecuencia de aparición. Se describe un caso con presencia de rash urticariforme como único síntoma reportado en un paciente con diagnóstico de COVID-19(AU)
Since its appearance in Wuhan, China, and after more than two years after being declared a pandemic, COVID-19 has caused more than five million deaths in the world. It is widely known that it not only affects the respiratory system, but also has digestive, cardiovascular, endocrine-metabolic, neurological, renal and skin manifestations. The dermatological spectrum that is related to COVID-19 has been defined in five main groups of manifestations: maculopapular lesions, acral lesions, urticarial pattern, vesicular pattern and livedoid or necrotic lesions, according to their frequency of appearance. A case is described with the presence of urticarial rash as the only symptom reported in a patient diagnosed with COVID-19(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Skin Manifestations , Urticaria/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSEOF REVIEW: Chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria (CSU/CindU) are caused by mast cell and basophil activation leading to degranulation and the release of histamine and several other mediators. Three kinds of factors can trigger mast cells in CSU: (1) activation of stimulating receptor(s) on the mast cell membrane, (2) upregulation of certain receptor(s), and (3) intracellular dysregulation in signaling with overexpression of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) or reduced activation of the inhibitory Src homology 2 (SH2)-containing inositol phosphatases (SHIP)-related pathways. In CSU, two major endotypes exist based on the primary receptor activating mechanism: type I hypersensitivity (IgE-mediated, directed against auto-allergens) and type IIb (autoimmune, via IgG autoantibodies directed against IgE or the IgE-receptor). Their treatment responses vary. We discuss in vitro and in vivo biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with auto-allergic CSU have clinical characteristics that can distinguish them partly from those with autoimmune CSU. Most importantly, their disease generally presents a less aggressive course, a better response to second generation (up-dosed) antihistamines and a good response to omalizumab, if necessary. Meanwhile, autoimmune CSU/CindU patients fare less well and often need immunosuppressive drugs. Biomarkers that might help endotype CSU/CindU patients and select the most appropriate treatment, dose, and duration, e.g., for autoallergic CSU, high total IgE and IgE against auto-allergens; for autoimmune CSU, low IgE, basopenia, and IgG against autoantigens like thyroid peroxidase and a positive autologous serum skin test (but sometimes also positive in autoallergy). Some biomarkers are easily accessible but of low specificity; others are highly specific but more futuristic.
Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Urticaria , Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin E , Biomarkers , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Allergens , Chronic Inducible Urticaria , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
Objectives: To confirm the presence of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to these drugs. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study. Patients between 12 and 60 years old with a history of immediate reaction after administration of penicillin and/or amoxicillin were included. Skin prick and intradermal tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and penicillin G, as well as oral challenge with amoxicillin. Results: Ten female and 3 male patients were included. The mean age was 39 years. In 84.6% of the cases the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all cases it manifested with urticaria. Allergy to penicillin was corroborated in only 38.4% of cases. The most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo exposure tests was pruritus in 23%. Conclusions: Patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure testing with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergic reactions and improve treatment conditions.
Objetivos: Confirmar la presencia de alergia a penicilina y amoxicilina mediante pruebas de exposición in vivo, en pacientes que refieren antecedente de reacción inmediata con estos medicamentos. Métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, descriptivo y prolectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes entre 12 y 60 años con antecedente de reacción inmediata tras administración de penicilina y/o amoxicilina. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas por prick e intradérmicas con bencilpeniciloil polilisina y penicilina G, así como desafío oral con amoxicilina. Resultados: Se incluyeron 10 pacientes femeninos y 3 masculinos. La edad promedio fue 39 años. En 84,6% de los casos la última reacción adversa a medica- mentos ocurrió 10 años atrás y en todos los casos se manifestó con urticaria. Sólo en el 38,4% se corroboró alergia a penicilina. La reacción adversa más frecuen- te, tras las pruebas de exposición in vivo fue prurito en el 23%. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con sospecha de alergia a penicilina se deben evaluar mediante pruebas de exposición in vivo con los determinantes mayores y menores, para corroborar o descartar reacciones alérgicas y mejorar las condiciones de tratamiento.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Urticaria , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Skin Tests , Penicillins/adverse effects , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Background: The most commonly reported antibiotic allergy is penicillin. The false label of "allergy" to penicillin negatively affects the patient's quality of life and medical care. Objective: To determine the frequency of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to this class of medicinal products. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study in patients between 12 and 60 years of age with a history of immediate reaction to penicillin and/or amoxicillin. Prick and intradermal skin tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G and oral challenge test with amoxicillin. The frequency of positivity and negativity in these tests was calculated with a 95% CI. Results were analyzed in Epi info 7.2.5.0. Results: In total 13 patients (10 women) were included, with a mean age of 39 years (SD 12.14). In 84.6% the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all manifested with urticaria. The 38.4% confirmed penicillin allergy and the most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo tests was pruritus. Conclusions: The clinical history alone is not sufficient, all patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure tests with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergy to this pharmacological class.
Antecedentes: La alergia a antibióticos notificada con más frecuencia es la penicilina. La falsa etiqueta de "alergia" a la penicilina afecta negativamente la calidad de vida del paciente y la atención médica. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de alergia a penicilina y amoxicilina mediante pruebas de exposición in vivo, en pacientes con antecedente de reacción inmediata a esta clase de medicamentos. Métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal, descriptivo y prolectivo en pacientes entre 12 y 60 años con antecedente de reacción inmediata a penicilina y/o amoxicilina. Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas por prick e intradérmicas con bencilpeniciloil polilisina y penicilina G, y prueba de reto oral con amoxicilina. La frecuencia de positividad y negatividad en estas pruebas fue calculado con un IC del 95%. Los resultados se analizaron en Epi info 7.2.5.0. Resultados: Se incluyeron 13 pacientes (10 mujeres), con una media de edad de 39 años (DE 12.14) y diagnóstico predominante de rinitis alérgica (61,5%). En 84,6% de casos la última reacción adversa a medicamentos ocurrió 10 años atrás y en todos se manifestó con urticaria. Sólo en cinco pacientes (38,4%) se corroboró alergia a penicilina y la reacción adversa más frecuente tras las pruebas in vivo fue prurito (23 %). Conclusiones: La historia clínica por sí sola no es suficiente, todos los pacientes con sospecha de alergia a penicilina deben ser evaluados mediante pruebas de exposición in vivo con los determinantes mayores y menores para corroborar o descartar alergia a esta clase farmacológica.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Urticaria , Adult , Female , Humans , Amoxicillin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Penicillins/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Skin Tests/methods , Male , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Urticaria is a distinctive pattern of inflammatory response of the skin and/or mucous membranes characterized by the sudden appearance of vanishing wheals, angioedema, or both, associated with pruritus. Acute forms are frequent and limited to outbreaks of less than 6 weeks; while the chronic ones have a prevalence of less than 1%, longer duration and can be spontaneous or inducible. The etiopathogenic mechanisms involved in this disease include autoallergy, autoimmunity, and inflammation with cell activation, mainly of the mast cell, leading to its degranulation with the release of vasoactive mediators. Along its approach, diagnostic confirmation, search for indicators of its etiopathogenesis, detection of cofactors that can modulate its activity, recognition of comorbidities, evaluation of possible biomarkers and the assessment of disease activity, impact and control are essential. The pharmacological management aims to control the symptoms, until the urticaria, which is self-resolving, is gone. This is described in a stepwise fashion with increasing complexity.
La urticaria es un patrón distintivo de respuesta inflamatoria de piel y/o mucosas caracterizada por la aparición súbita de ronchas evanescentes, angioedema o ambos, asociados a prurito. Las formas agudas son frecuentes y se limitan a brotes de menos de 6 semanas; mientras que las crónicas tienen una prevalencia menor al 1%, mayor duración y pueden ser espontáneas o inducibles. Los mecanismos etiopatogénicos involucrados en esta enfermedad incluyen la autoalergia, la autoinmunidad y la inflamación con la activación celular, principalmente del mastocito, lo que lleva a su degranulación con liberación de mediadores vasoactivos. En su abordaje son fundamentales la confirmación diagnóstica; la búsqueda de indicadores de su etiopatogenia; la detección de cofactores que pueden modular su actividad; el reconocimiento de comorbilidades; la evaluación de posibles biomarcadores y, el impacto en la calidad de vida, el registro de la actividad y el control de la enfermedad. El manejo farmacológico tiene por objetivo controlar los síntomas, mientras la urticaria resuelve de forma espontánea. Este se describe de forma escalonada con una complejidad creciente.
Subject(s)
Angioedema , Chronic Urticaria , Urticaria , Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/drug therapy , Urticaria/etiology , Chronic Urticaria/diagnosis , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence, causes and risk factors of ADE in hospitalized patients of a General Hospital. METHODS: Observational and analytical case-control study, carried out in patients hospitalized for adverse drug events, treated at the Hospital General Dr. Eduardo Vázquez N, in Puebla, Mexico, between, June 2019 to June 2021. For the statistical analysis, percentages, frequencies, means, odds ratio, χ2, and multiple binary logistic regression were used. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 23 program. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (66 cases and 66 controls) were registered. Of the group of cases, 26 patients treated for medication error and 40 with adverse drug reaction were reported. The prevalence of adverse drug events was 3.6%. The drugs and factors associated with the most reported adverse events were: antibiotics, anti-inflammatories; average age of 35 years (SD: 17.41); gender: 39.3% men, 60.7% women; services re-ported with the greatest attention: Emergencies and Surgery; frequent route of administration: intravenous (32.3%); main symptoms: skin; symptoms associated with adverse drug reactions: type A pruritus [OR: 8.5, p = 0.001(CI95%: 0.035-0.393)], type B pruritus [OR: 11, p = 0.001 (CI95%: 0.021-0.368)]; urticaria [OR: 19, p = 0.005(CI95%: 0.007-0.412)]. Risk factors associated with adverse events were: female gender [OR: 2.6, p = 0.05 (CI95%: 1.33-5.43)], history of allergy [OR: 3.4, p = 0.033 (CI95%: 1.04-8.40)] and prolonged hospital stay [OR: 5.4, p = 0.023 (CI95%: 3.82-6.74)]. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ADEs were EM or ADR type A, both preventable reactions, so patient safety should be a priority when prescribing.
OBJECTIVO: Determinar la prevalencia, causas y factores de riesgo en pacientes hospitalizados por eventos ad-versos a medicamentos. MÉTODOS: Estudio de casos y controles, observacional y analítico, llevado a cabo en pacientes hospitalizados por eventos adversos a medicamentos, atendidos en el Hospital General Dr. Eduardo Vázquez N, Puebla, México, entre junio de 2019 y junio de 2021. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron porcentajes, frecuencias, promedios, razón de momios, χ2 y regresión logística binaria múltiple. Los datos se analizaron con el programa Statistical Package, for the Social Sciencies 23. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 132 pacientes (66 casos y 66 controles). Del grupo de casos se informaron 26 pacientes atendidos por error de medicación y 40 con reacción adversa a medicamentos. La prevalencia de eventos adversos a medicamentos fue del 3.6%. Los medicamentos y factores asociados con eventos adversos más reportados fueron: antibióticos, antiinflamatorios; edad promedio de 35años (DE: 17.41); sexo: 39.3% hombres, 60.7% mujeres; servicios reportados con mayor atención: Urgencias y Cirugía; vía administración frecuente: intravenosa (32.3%); síntomas principales: cutáneos; síntomas asociados con reacciones adversas a medicamentos: tipo A prurito [RM: 8.5, p = 0.001(IC95%: 0.035-0.393)], tipo B prurito [RM:11, p = 0.001 (IC95%: 0.021-0.368)]; urticaria [RM: 19, p = 0.005(IC95%: 0.007-0.412)]. Los factores riesgo asociados con eventos adversos fueron: género femenino [RM: 2.6, p = 0.05 (IC95%: 1.33-5.43)], antecedente de alergia [RM: 3.4, p = 0.033 (IC95%: 1.04-8.40)] y estancia intrahospitalaria prolongada [RM: 5.4, p = 0.023 (IC95%: 3.82-6.74)]. CONCLUSIONES: La mayor parte de los eventos adversos a medicamentos se originan por errores de medicación o reacciones adversas a fármacos tipo A; sin embargo, ambos pueden prevenirse. La seguridad del paciente debe ser prioridad al momento de prescribir cualquier tipo de medicamento.
Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Urticaria , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Prevalence , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Hospitals, General , Pruritus , HospitalizationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 continues to threaten public health. The virus is causing breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals. Also, scarce information is available about cutaneous manifestations after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. CASE PRESENTATION AND FINDINGS: A case of a triple-vaccinated (Pfizer) 37-year-old Hispanic American (Colombian) male who developed urticaria after Omicron BA.5.1 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 breakthrough infection is described. Virus isolation and whole genome sequencing along with immune and molecular assays were performed. Dermatological manifestations (skin rash and urticaria) after Omicron BA.5.1 infection were observed. Sequence analysis of the Omicron BA.5.1 isolate also revealed several important mutations. Hemogram analysis revealed leukocytosis and neutrophilia. Serology testing revealed anti-spike immunoglobulin G serum titers but negative detection of immunoglobulin M at 10 days after symptom onset. Anti-nucleocapsid, anti-spike 1 immunoglobulin G, anti-spike trimer, and anti-receptor-binding-domain immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin E sera were detected at different titers 10 days after symptom onset. Several serum levels of chemokines/cytokines (Interferon-α, interferon-γ, interleukin-12/interleukin-23p40, interleukin-18, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, monokine induced by gamma, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand-5 , tumor necrosis factor-ß1, Tumor necrosis factor-α) were detected, but interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and interleukin-17A were below the limit of detection. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study describing skin effects of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron BA.5 variant breakthrough infection in a triple-vaccinated patient in Colombia. Several important mutations were found in the spike glycoprotein of the virus isolated; these mutations are associated with immune evasion and changes in antigenic properties of the virus. Physicians overseeing coronavirus disease 2019 cases should be aware of the potential skin effects of the infection. Pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and its association with proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines may enhance the development of urticaria and other skin manifestations in immunized individuals. However, further studies are needed to better understand the complexity of coronavirus disease in such situations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Urticaria , Male , Humans , Adult , Urticaria/etiology , Skin , Cytokines , Antibodies, ViralABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori has been linked to several diseases such as chronic urticaria, gastritis, and type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors (type 1 gNET). Although these diseases seem to have different mechanisms, their relationship with H. pylori suggests a common inflammatory pathway. OBJECTIVE: To identify potential cross-reactive antigens between H. pylori and humans involved in chronic urticaria and type 1 gNET. METHODS: Alignment was carried out among human proteins associated with urticaria (9 proteins), type 1 gNET (32 proteins), and H. pylori proteome. We performed pairwise alignment among the human and H. pylori antigens with PSI-BLAST. Modeling based on homology was done with the Swiss model server and epitope prediction with the Ellipro server. Epitopes were located on a 3D model using PYMOL software. RESULTS: The highest conserved sequence was found between the human HSP 60 antigen and the H. pylori chaperonin GroEL with an identity of 54% and a cover of 92%, followed by the alpha and gamma enolases and two H. pylori phosphopyruvate hydratase, both with an identity and cover of 48% and 96%, respectively. The H/K ATPase (Chain A) showed high identity with two H. pylori proteins (35.21% with both P-type ATPase), but with low cover (only 6%). We observed eight linear and three discontinuous epitopes for human HSP 60 and three lineal and one discontinuous epitope for both alpha-enolase and gamma enolase, high conserved with H. pylori sequences. CONCLUSION: Some type 1 gNET antigens shared potential cross-reactive epitopes with H. pylori proteins, suggesting that molecular mimicry could be a mechanism that explains the relationship between the infection and this disease. Studies evaluating the functional impact of this relationship are needed.
Subject(s)
Chronic Urticaria , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Urticaria , Humans , Epitopes , Helicobacter Infections/complicationsABSTRACT
The increase in agricultural productivity associated with the emergence and the extensive use of pesticides is undeniable. However, strong evidence indicates that this continuous demand is causing serious environmental impacts and bringing toxic effects to associated biota as pollinating insects. The present work aims the determination of the insecticide abamectin (ABA) and the fungicide difenoconazole (DIF) in strawberry flowers (Fragaria x ananassa DUCH.) and pollen sampled from beehives of the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae) located nearby strawberry fields. For analysis, QuEChERS method was optimized, and the analytical performance of those two pesticides was verified. Then, the method was applied to strawberry flowers and the pollen was sampled during three field campaigns. While abamectin was not detected, the systemic fungicide difenoconazole was determined in almost all flowers and pollen samples, demonstrating the major persistence of this pesticide in investigated matrices. The results were then discussed about the difenoconazole application rate and transport to colonies to estimate a preliminary environmental risk assessment for stingless native bees. All calculations were proceeded considering exposure rates and toxicity data from the literature, adapted from Apis mellifera studies. In this sense, the determination, application, and discussion about risk assessment figure out as an important tool to the knowledge about the preliminary risks of native bees exposed to pesticides.
Subject(s)
Fragaria , Fungicides, Industrial , Hymenoptera , Pesticides , Urticaria , Bees , Animals , PollenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a myriad of cutaneous manifestations have been described in association with this viral infection. However, in Latin America, this kind of data is still scarce. OBJECTIVE: In this sense, the goal of this study was to describe the dermatological findings observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection, in a Brazilian Hospital. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective and descriptive study of 50 cases of new-onset dermatologic symptoms in patients with COVID-19, treated at Hospital Sírio-Libanês, from February to June 2020. RESULTS: The patients (nâ¯=â¯50) were classified into 6 groups, according to the elementary lesions and the statistical analysis was performed. The most common cutaneous lesions were maculopapular eruptions (44%), necrosis, purpura, and livedo (32%), urticarial lesions (12%), pseudochilblains (4%) and papular-vesicular eruption (4%). In 46% of the patients the cutaneous lesions occurred in association with other symptoms, such as pruritus (38%), pain and burning sensation (8%). Lower limbs were affected in 44% of the cases, followed by the trunk (38%), upper limbs (24%) and face (14%). Cutaneous lesions were mostly found after other COVID-19 systemic symptoms, with a mean period between the viral syndrome and cutaneous signs of 5 days (SDâ¯=â¯6.1 days). STUDY LIMITATIONS: It is a small sample, in a single-center study, with patients exclusively from a private Hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Brazil have the same proportion of lesions as revealed in other studies in Europa. The compiled data is essential for a better understanding of cutaneous manifestations deemed secondary to COVID.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Exanthema , Urticaria , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
Erythema Multiforme , Urticaria , Humans , Urticaria/diagnosis , Urticaria/etiology , Erythema Multiforme/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The course of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can be influenced by infections, depression, and stress. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the course of refractory CSU together with patient adherence to omalizumab and treatment adjustments. METHODS: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) was used to assess disease activity. Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FC-19s), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21s) were performed to assess mental health status. All scales were performed during the Quarantine Period (QP) and Return to the Normal Period (RTNP). UAS7 Before Pandemic (BP) was recorded from the patients medical records. RESULTS: The authors evaluated 104 omalizumab-receiving CSU patients. UAS7 scores during QP were significantly higher than those in RTNP and BP (p < 0.01). DASS-21 and FC-19 scores were significantly higher during QP compared to RTNP (p < 0.01). Nineteen (18.2%) patients ceased omalizumab, 9 patients prolonged the intervals between subsequent doses during the pandemic. UAS7 scores in QP were significantly higher in patients who ceased omalizumab than in those who continued (p < 0.001). Among patients who continued omalizumab, 22.4% had an increase in urticaria activity and higher FC-19 scores in comparison with those with stable disease activity (p = 0.008). STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size of patients with prolonged intervals of omalizumab and the lack of mental health evaluation with the same tools prior to the study. CONCLUSION: Fear induced by COVID-19 can determine an increase in disease activity. Therefore, patients on omalizumab should continue their treatment and prolonged interval without omalizumab can be considered in patients with good urticaria control.