Translating coding lists in administrative claims-based research for cardiovascular procedures.

BACKGROUND: To effectively use administrative claims for healthcare research, clinical events must be inferred from coding data according to validated algorithms. In October 2015, the United States transitioned from the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) to the Tenth Revision (ICD-10). We describe our method to derive new ICD-10 codes for outcomes after vascular procedures from our prior, validated ICD-9 codes. METHODS: We began with validated ICD-9 coding lists known to represent outcomes after lower extremity revascularization, thoracic aortic endograft placement, abdominal aortic aneurysm reintervention, and carotid revascularization. We used the publicly available general equivalence mapping tools to derive corresponding ICD-10 codes for each of the ICD-9 codes in our current lists. The resulting lists were then manually reviewed by multiple authors to ensure clinical relevance for appropriate event detection. Clinically nonrelevant and duplicated codes were removed. RESULTS: A total of 475 ICD-9 codes were translated to ICD-10 with a 98-fold increase (n = 46,630) in the total number of codes. Overall, we found that 77% of codes (n = 35,833) were either duplicated or not clinically relevant upon manual review. For example, for thoracic aortic endograft placement, 97 ICD-9 codes mapped to 14,661 ICD-10 codes in total. A total of 890 codes were removed as duplicates and 9035 codes were removed during manual clinical review. The resultant, reviewed list contained 4736 ICD-10 codes representing a 49-fold increase from the initial ICD-9 list. Findings were similar across the other procedures studied. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-10 has expanded the number of codes necessary to describe outcomes after vascular procedures. More than 75% of the codes obtained using the general equivalence mapping database were either duplicated or not clinically relevant. Manual review of codes by researchers with clinical knowledge of the procedures is imperative.

Claims Variability in Charges and Payments for Common Open and Endovascular Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Cost-effectiveness in healthcare is being increasingly scrutinized. Data regarding claims variability for vascular operations are lacking. Herein, we aim to describe variability in charges and payments for aortoiliac (AI) and infrainguinal (II) revascularizations. METHODS: We analyzed 2012-2014 claims data from a statewide claims database for procedures grouped by Current Procedural Terminology codes into II-open (II-O), II-endovascular (II-E), AI-open (AI-O), and AI-endovascular interventions (AI-E). We compared charges and payments in urban (≥50,000 people, UAs) versus rural areas (<50,000 people, RAs). Amounts are reported in $US as median with interquartile range. Cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) as a measure of reimbursement were calculated as the percentage of the charges covered by the payments. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to determine significant differences. RESULTS: A total of 5,239 persons had complete claims data. There were 7,239 UA and 6,891 RA claims, and 1,057 AI claims (AI-E = 879, AI-O = 178) and 4,182 II claims (II-E = 3,012, II-0 = 1,170). Median charges were $5,357 for AI [$1,846-$27,107] and $2,955 for II [$1,484-$9,338.5] (P < 0.0001). Median plan payment was $454 for AI [$0-$1,380] and $454 for II [$54-$1,060] (P = 0.67). For AI and II, charges were significantly higher for UA than RA (AI: UA $9,875 [$2,489-$34,427], RA $3,732 [$1,450-$20,595], P < 0.0001; II: UA $3,596 [$1,700-$21,664], RA $2,534 [$1,298-$6,169], P < 0.0001). AI-E charges were higher than AI-O (AI-E $7,960 [$1,699-$32,507], AI-O $4,774 [$2,636-$7,147], P < 0.0001), but AI-O payments were higher (AI-E $424 [$0-$1,270], AI-O $869 [$164-$1,435], P = 0.0067). II-E charges were higher (II-E $2,994 [$1,552-$22,164], II-O $2,873 [$1,108-$5,345], P < 0.0001), but II-O payments were higher (II-E $427 [$50-$907], II-O $596 [$73-$1,299], P < 0.0001). CCRs were highest for II operations and UAs. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability in claim charges and payments exists for vascular operations. AI procedures had higher charges than II, without any difference in payments. UA charged more than RA for both AI and II operations, but RA had higher payments and CCRs. Endovascular procedures had higher charges, while open procedures had higher payments. Charge differences may be related to endovascular device costs, and further research is necessary to determine the reasons behind consistent claims variability between UA and RA.

A physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation results in improved health care documentation, case mix index, and increased contribution margin.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical documentation is the key determinant of inpatient acuity of illness and payer reimbursement. Every inpatient hospitalization is placed into a diagnosis related group with a relative value based on documented procedures, conditions, comorbidities and complications. The Case Mix Index (CMI) is an average of these diagnosis related groups and directly impacts physician profiling, medical center profiling, reimbursement, and quality reporting. We hypothesize that a focused, physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation of vascular surgery inpatients results in increased CMI and contribution margin. METHODS: A physician-led coding initiative to educate physicians on the documentation of comorbidities and conditions was initiated with concurrent chart review sessions with coding specialists for 3 months, and then as needed, after the creation of a vascular surgery documentation guide. Clinical documentation and billing for all carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and open infrainguinal procedures (OIPs) performed between January 2013 and July 2016 were stratified into precoding and postcoding initiative groups. Age, duration of stay, direct costs, actual reimbursements, contribution margin (CM), CMI, rate of complication or comorbidity, major complication or comorbidity, severity of illness, and risk of mortality assigned to each discharge were abstracted. Data were compared over time by standardizing Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) values for each diagnosis related group and using a CMS base rate reimbursement. RESULTS: Among 458 CEA admissions, postcoding initiative CEA patients (n = 253) had a significantly higher CMI (1.36 vs 1.25; P = .03), CM ($7859 vs $6650; P = .048), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($8955 vs $8258; P = .03) than precoding initiative CEA patients (n = 205). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (43% vs 27%; P < .01). Among 504 OIPs, postcoding initiative patients (n = 227) had a significantly higher CMI (2.23 vs 2.05; P < .01), actual reimbursement ($23,203 vs $19,909; P < .01), CM ($12,165 vs $8840; P < .01), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($14,649 vs $13,496; P < .01) than precoding initiative patients (n = 277). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (61% vs 43%; P < .01). For both CEA and OIPs, there were no differences in age, duration of stay, total direct costs, or primary insurance status between the precoding and postcoding patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and detailed clinical documentation is required for key stakeholders to characterize the acuity of inpatient admissions and ensure appropriate reimbursement; it is also a key component of risk-adjustment methods for assessing quality of care. A physician-led documentation initiative significantly increased CMI and CM.

[Ten-year results of abdominal aortic and great vessels aneurysms management]. / Desiatiletnie rezul'taty lecheniia bol'nykh s anevrizmami briushnoi aorty i magistral'nykh arterii.

AIM: To present own 10-year experience of abdominal aortic and great vessels aneurysms management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 369 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) for the period 1995-2016 at the Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital. 25% of patients suffered from abdominal aortic and great vessels aneurysms. Mean age was 70.3±7.5. There were 79 (86%) men and 13 (14%) women. 93 patients had 212 aneurysms of other sites besides AAA (from 1 to 6 aneurysms in each case). 63 (68%) patients have been treated and followed-up for the period from 1 to 10 years (mean 105±11.8 months). RESULTS: 1-, 5-, 8- and 10-year survival after AAA repair was 98%, 81%, 54% and 38% respectively. CONCLUSION: The common complications of great vessels aneurysms are distal thrombosis and embolism (40%). Ruptures of aneurysms are less common (13%). These complications require active surgical tactics that allows to preserve the limbs in 85% of patients. Progressive nature of disease in overwhelming numbers of patients (95%) with aneurysms enlargement and their occurrence in other sites requires regular lifelong clinical examination with mandatory ultrasound 2 times per year.

Positive Impact of an Aortic Center Designation.

BACKGROUND: In January 2015, we created a multidisciplinary Aortic Center with the collaboration of Vascular Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Interventional Radiology, Anesthesia and Hospital Administration. We report the initial success of creating a Comprehensive Aortic Center. METHODS: All aortic procedures performed from January 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016 were entered into a prospectively collected database and compared with available data for 2014. Primary outcomes included the number of all aortic related procedures, transfer acceptance rate, transfer time, and proportion of elective/emergent referrals. RESULTS: The Aortic Center included 5 vascular surgeons, 2 cardiac surgeons, and 2 interventional radiologists. Workflow processes were implemented to streamline patient transfers as well as physician and operating room notification. Total aortic volume increased significantly from 162 to 261 patients. This reflected an overall 59% (P = 0.0167) increase in all aorta-related procedures. We had a 65% overall increase in transfer requests with 156% increase in acceptance of referrals and 136% drop in transfer denials (P < 0.0001). Emergent abdominal aortic cases accounted for 17% (n = 45) of our total aortic volume in 2015. The average transfer time from request to arrival decreased from 515 to 352 min, although this change was not statistically significant. We did see a significant increase in the use of air-transfers for aortic patients (P = 0.0041). Factorial analysis showed that time for transfer was affected only by air-transfer use, regardless of the year the patient was transferred. Transfer volume and volume of aortic related procedures remained stable in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Designation as a comprehensive Aortic Center with implementation of strategic workflow systems and a culture of "no refusal of transfers" resulted in a significant increase in aortic volume for both emergent and elective aortic cases. Case volumes increased for all specialties involved in the center. Improvements in transfer center and emergency medical services communication demonstrated a trend toward more efficient transfer times. These increases and improvements were sustainable for 2 years after this designation.

A multidisciplinary approach to vascular surgery procedure coding improves coding accuracy, work relative value unit assignment, and reimbursement.

BACKGROUND: Vascular surgery procedural reimbursement depends on accurate procedural coding and documentation. Despite the critical importance of correct coding, there has been a paucity of research focused on the effect of direct physician involvement. We hypothesize that direct physician involvement in procedural coding will lead to improved coding accuracy, increased work relative value unit (wRVU) assignment, and increased physician reimbursement. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study evaluated procedural coding accuracy of fistulograms at an academic medical institution (January-June 2014). All fistulograms were coded by institutional coders (traditional coding) and by a single vascular surgeon whose codes were verified by two institution coders (multidisciplinary coding). The coding methods were compared, and differences were translated into revenue and wRVUs using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Comparison between traditional and multidisciplinary coding was performed for three discrete study periods: baseline (period 1), after a coding education session for physicians and coders (period 2), and after a coding education session with implementation of an operative dictation template (period 3). The accuracy of surgeon operative dictations during each study period was also assessed. An external validation at a second academic institution was performed during period 1 to assess and compare coding accuracy. RESULTS: During period 1, traditional coding resulted in a 4.4% (P = .004) loss in reimbursement and a 5.4% (P = .01) loss in wRVUs compared with multidisciplinary coding. During period 2, no significant difference was found between traditional and multidisciplinary coding in reimbursement (1.3% loss; P = .24) or wRVUs (1.8% loss; P = .20). During period 3, traditional coding yielded a higher overall reimbursement (1.3% gain; P = .26) than multidisciplinary coding. This increase, however, was due to errors by institution coders, with six inappropriately used codes resulting in a higher overall reimbursement that was subsequently corrected. Assessment of physician documentation showed improvement, with decreased documentation errors at each period (11% vs 3.1% vs 0.6%; P = .02). Overall, between period 1 and period 3, multidisciplinary coding resulted in a significant increase in additional reimbursement ($17.63 per procedure; P = .004) and wRVUs (0.50 per procedure; P = .01). External validation at a second academic institution was performed to assess coding accuracy during period 1. Similar to institution 1, traditional coding revealed an 11% loss in reimbursement ($13,178 vs $14,630; P = .007) and a 12% loss in wRVU (293 vs 329; P = .01) compared with multidisciplinary coding. CONCLUSIONS: Physician involvement in the coding of endovascular procedures leads to improved procedural coding accuracy, increased wRVU assignments, and increased physician reimbursement.

Identification of technique variations among microvascular surgeons and cases using hierarchical task analysis.

A hierarchical taxonomy was developed for identifying differences among microvascular surgeons and cases and for investigating the impact of those differences on case outcome. Hierarchical task analysis was performed on eight microvascular anastomosis cases. The analysis was simplified by redefining subtasks and elements to only describe actions and adding attributes to describe the work object, method, tool, material, conditions and ergonomics factors. The resulting taxonomy was applied to 64 cases. Differences were found among cases for the frequency and duration of subtask, elements, attributes and element sequences. Observed variations were used to formulate hypotheses about the relationship between different methods and outcomes that can be tested in future studies. The taxonomy provides a framework for comparing alternative methods, determining the best methods for given conditions and for surgical training and retraining. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: A hierarchical taxonomy, created from a hierarchical task analysis and work attributes, was applied to describe technique variations among microsurgery cases. Variations in time, frequency and sequence were used to form hypotheses on best methods for standardising procedures.

[Results of surgical treatment of patients with internal carotid artery kinking depending on methods of its reconstruction].

It was analyzed the results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with internal carotid artery kinking operated in the department of vascular surgery of acad. B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery of RAN. Indications for surgery included symptoms of cerebrovascular insufficiency (CVI) and instrumentally confirmed hemodynamically significant kinking of ICA. Criteria for surgical treatment were linear flow velocity gradient more than 2 and turbulent blood flow in the kinking segment diagnosed by ultrasonic scanning. All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on methods of surgery. The first group included 36 (60%) patients who underwent resection of ICA with orifice bringing down. The second group included 8 (13%) patients after ICA replacement and 16 (27%) cases with eversion endarterectomy, resection of ICA and orifice bringing down. The analysis of immediate surgery results did not reveal significant differences in dynamics of CVI and velocity parameters in reconstructed ICA (p>0.05). The index "stroke+mortality from stroke" was higher in the second group (p<0.05). Thrombosis of ICA reconstruction area has been developing more frequent (p<0.05) after ICA replacement (8%) in comparison with resection of ICA with orifice bringing down (0) and eversion endarterectomy, resection of ICA and orifice bringing down (0). Our data show that resection of ICA with orifice bringing down is preferable for surgical treatment of ICA kinking. ICA replacement is associated with significantly more frequent complications. Eversion endarterectomy with resection of ICA is optimal in case of combination of kinking with stenosis of ICA.

[Complications after reconstructive operations on major arteries of lower limbs and methods of correction thereof].

The present study was aimed at revealing and examining the causes of specific complications after reconstructive vascular operations in the aortic-iliac-femoral zones. The study comprised a total of 155 patients, with the period of postoperative follow up amounting to 3 years. Thirty-nine patients were operated on for various specific complications within the terms from 1 to 3 years. The results of the study showed clear-cut relationship between the development of complications and progression of the underlying disease. Satisfactory results after secondary interventions were obtained in patients with good state of the distal bed and operated on at early terms after complications.

Renal cell carcinoma accompanied by venous invasion and inferior vena cava thrombus: classification and operative strategies for the vascular surgeon.

Venous invasion is a common characteristic of renal cell carcinoma, manifesting as tumor thrombus with possible extension into the renal vein and, in extensive cases, the thrombus can reach from the renal vein to the right atrium. Currently, cytoreductive nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy are the foundations for improving quality of life and survival in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, and a role has emerged for a vascular specialist to become an integral part of operative planning and therapy.

Standardization of surgical procedures for identifying best practices and training.

A taxonomy was developed a) to describe surgical procedures with sufficient detail to review differences among surgeons, b) to examine the relationship between individual technique and outcomes, c) to enable surgeons to standardize technique around best practices and d) to identify clinical-evidence-based key points of teaching and assessment for surgical training. Sixty-seven microvascular anastomoses were recorded through video cameras mounted in the dissecting microscope. A hierarchical task analysis was used to decompose the observed procedures into successive levels of detail. The results were then presented to individual and small groups of microvascular surgeons to help define steps and step attributes necessary to describe a procedure so that other surgeons can perform the procedure exactly the same way. Coincidently, it was found that because the surgeons' attention is confined to a very small field of view in which they can see only the veins and arteries and the ends of their instruments, they often have difficulty communicating with others in the operating room. Analyses of selected cases using the proposed taxonomy shows how subtle details are revealed that may affect outcomes, and indicate specific training needs. By comparing different methods and outcomes, it should be possible to identify best practices for given conditions.

[The nearest and remote results in treatment aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and the main arteries].

In the modern literature are taken widely up questions of medical tactics at an aneurysm of abdominal aorta (AA) depending on its sizes, presence of signs and presence of risk factors. The purpose of work was studying current aneurysm illnesses in various arterial parts, developments of optimum tactics of conducting patients and its influence on the remote results of operative treatment. Into research have entered 51 patient, suffering aneurism of an aorta, it branches and other main arteries. The nearest and remote results of dynamic supervision and operative treatment have been studied. The age of patients was within the limits of from 50 till 88 years, and has on the average made 71,8 ± 6,16. A parity men and women 8:1. Diameter AA changed from 3 up to 12 sm. Aneurysms combination met in an ascending part of an aorta, subclavian arteries, brachiochephalic trunk, carotid, iliofemoral, popliteal and limb arteries. All patients had accompanying cardial pathology. Patients have been divided into 2 groups. The first was made by 34 patients by whom resection AA has been made. Patients of the second group (17 patients) has been executed by dynamic supervision. The remote results are studied at 32 (62,7%) persons. Term of supervision has made from 6 till 168 months on the average. Postoperative lethal cases at scheduled operations were 4,7%, the general postoperative lethal cases were about - 11,7%. At the analysis of the remote results it is established, that the survival rate in a year has made 100 %, 5 years - 83,3% of patients. Average life expectancy in the given group of patients has made 76,4 ± 4 years, that there corresponds to data the WOHC for a healthy population. Dynamic supervision in both groups has shown progressing current of aneurysms combination in all arterial parts. Our data show perspectivity of surgical treatment aneurysms of an aorta and the main arteries except for patients with multistorey aneurysmosis arteries of legs in a combination to the continued thrombosis, in which treatment we adhere conservative tactics.

Revascularization in the new year.

New codes bring new guidelines for the lower revascularization procedures. It is important that all staff members responsible for coding and charge capture understand how to properly assign correct codes for these procedures.

Coronary stents and the uptake of new medical devices in the German system of inpatient reimbursement.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze mechanisms for facilitating the uptake of new medical devices in the German system of hospital reimbursement, focusing on the example of coronary stents, including (1) trends in their coding, (2) associated diagnosis-related group (DRG) payments, (3) their integration in the German DRG (G-DRG) system, and (4) their diffusion within the inpatient sector. METHODS: Published and gray literature provide the basis for analyzing the system of hospital reimbursement. Data on coronary stents were obtained from various regulatory and government bodies and examined in a longitudinal fashion. RESULTS: Although German Procedure Classification (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel; OPS) codes were created for a range of stent technologies between 2004 and 2009, the regular system of G-DRG reimbursement does not distinguish between different stents by means of unique DRGs. Instead, supplementary payments or extrabudgetary payments are used to ensure that newer technologies are reimbursed adequately. The limitations of extrabudgetary payments restrict the use of some devices to a small proportion of patients. Data on the diffusion of different stents show that factors other than the reimbursement regime likely also play a role in the frequency with which certain technologies are used. Bare metal stents currently account for most stent implantation procedures in Germany, followed by drug-eluting stents. CONCLUSION: The current system of G-DRG reimbursement and of extrabudgetary payments ensures that even the most recently developed technologies can be used in the German inpatient sector. Nevertheless, certain technologies may not be reaching the broad patient population.

Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: the VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document.

Non-uniform terminology in the world's venous literature has continued to pose a significant hindrance to the dissemination of knowledge regarding the management of chronic venous disorders. This VEIN-TERM consensus document was developed by a transatlantic interdisciplinary faculty of experts under the auspices of the American Venous Forum (AVF), the European Venous Forum (EVF), the International Union of Phlebology (IUP), the American College of Phlebology (ACP), and the International Union of Angiology (IUA). It provides recommendations for fundamental venous terminology, focusing on terms that were identified as creating interpretive problems, with the intent of promoting the use of a common scientific language in the investigation and management of chronic venous disorders. The VEIN-TERM consensus document is intended to augment previous transatlantic/international interdisciplinary efforts in standardizing venous nomenclature which are referenced in this article.