Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 262
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 17(7): e0270350, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793288

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the effects of different levels of cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL) and castor oil (CNSL-castor oil) with growth-promoting antibiotics associated with anticoccidials in broiler chickens challenged with coccidiosis. In this work, 2520 one-day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 84 pens, containing 30 birds each. The experimental design was completely randomized, with seven treatments: enramycin (8 ppm), virginiamycin (16.5 ppm), and tylosin (55 ppm); different doses of CNSL-castor oil (0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 kg/t); and a control diet (without additives). All treatments received semduramicin + nicarbazin (500 g/t; Aviax® Plus) from 0 to 28 d and monensin sodium (100 ppm; Elanco) from 29 to 35 days of age, when the feed was without antibiotics. The challenge was introduced at 14 days of age by inoculating broiler chickens with sporulated Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima oocysts via oral gavage. In addition to performance parameters, intestinal contents were collected at 28 and 42 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing the 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database (v. 138) with QIIME2 software (v. 2020.11). After one week of challenge, the broilers that received tylosin had a higher body weight gain (BWG) than those in the control group (p < 0.05), while the other treatments presented intermediate values. At 28 d, the BWG was lower for the control, CNSL-Castor oil 0.5 kg/t, enramycin, and virginiamycin treatments than that in the tylosin treatment. The inclusion of CNSL-Castor oil at concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t acted as an intermediate treatment (p < 0.05). For alpha diversity, using the Shannon index, it was possible to observe the effect of age, with substantial diversity at 42 d. The Firmicutes phylum had the highest abundance, with values between 84.33% and 95.16% at 42 d. Tylosin showed better performance indices than other treatments. CNSL-castor oil treatments with concentrations of 0.75 and 1 kg/t showed similar results to those of enramycin and virginiamycin. Furthermore, CNSL-castor oil acted as a modulator of intestinal microbiota, reducing the abundance of pathogenic bacteria.


Subject(s)
Anacardium , Coccidiosis , Eimeria , Microbiota , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Castor Oil , Chickens , Coccidiosis/drug therapy , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Male , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S , Tylosin/pharmacology , Tylosin/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
2.
J Antibiot (Tokyo) ; 73(9): 630-635, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32346089

ABSTRACT

To find a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, we evaluated the effects of combinations of retapamulin with macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin (MLS) antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Enterococcus faecium, and Enterococcus faecalis. Using both the disk diffusion test and checkerboard assay, we initially examined the effects of combinations of retapamulin with MLS antibiotics against standard strains of these species. Combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and quinupristin showed synergistic activity against E. faecalis only. Synergy of retapamulin with clindamycin and dalfopristin was not observed. Then, a checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the effects of the combinations against 15 clinical strains of E. faecalis. Retapamulin and quinupristin, the most synergistic combination, showed activity against all erythromycin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains tested. Among the eight strains with high-level erythromycin resistance, five strains were synergistically inhibited in the presence of only 1 µg of retapamulin per ml. Time-kill assay revealed that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin were bacteriostatic. These results suggest that combinations of retapamulin with erythromycin and quinupristin have in vitro synergistic activity against E. faecalis, including strains with high-level erythromycin resistance.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Diterpenes/therapeutic use , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Virginiamycin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Synergism , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Humans , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus pyogenes/drug effects , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
3.
Pesqui. vet. bras ; 39(2): 112-122, Feb. 2019. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-990243

ABSTRACT

Periodontal diseases are multifactorial infectious processes caused by complexes of microorganisms, with damage to health, production, and animal welfare. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of virginiamycin in the prevention and control of two early forms of periodontal disease: gingivitis and necrotizing gingivitis. Ten weaned calves, aged four to six months, were permanently kept in a single lot under the same rotational grazing regime in a newly reformed area of Panicum maximum. Five of the calves were orally administered 340mg of virginiamycin (Virginiamycin Group) daily for a period of 18 weeks, while the remaining five calves (Control Group) remained under the same food management but did not receive virginiamycin. During this period, animals underwent 18 weekly evaluations regarding periodontal health, with monitoring and recording of clinical parameters of the eight deciduous incisor teeth on the labial and lingual faces. At approximately two-week intervals, nine collections of subgingival sulcus material from five sites of the four right incisor teeth of each animal were performed and subjected to microbiological evaluation using polymerase chain reaction with primers of 25 microorganisms considered potentially pathogenic. After 1440 periodontal clinical evaluations of incisor teeth of the 10 calves, a total of 395 episodes of gingivitis were recorded, of which 267 occurred in the Control Group and 128 in the Virginiamycin Group. Similarly, 89 episodes of necrotizing gingivitis were recorded; 58 in the Control Group and 31 in the Virginiamycin Group. Comparison of between-group means found significant differences for teeth with gingivitis and necrotizing gingivitis (t test; p<0.05). The total number of teeth with gingivitis (p<0.01) and necrotizing gingivitis (p<0.01) in Control Group was significantly higher than that of gingivitis (p<0.01) and necrotizing gingivitis (p<0.05) in the Virginiamycin Group. There was a positive correlation between total occurrence of gingivitis and necrotizing gingivitis in the Virginiamycin Group by Pearson's test. Virginiamycin had a protective effect on treated animals compared with the Control Group (OR = 0.36: CI (95%) = 0.27-0.43). In the Control Group, Actinomyces israelli (4.74%), domain Archaea (1.58%), Eikenella corrodens (1.05%), Fusobacterium nucleatum (27.37%), class Mollicutes (5.26%); Porphyromonas endodontalis(5.26%); Porphyromonas gulae(0.53%), Prevotella buccae (6.32%), Prevotella loescheii (3.68%), Prevotella nigrescens (8.42%), Prevotella oralis (1.58%), Tannerella forsythia (0.53%), and Treponema denticola (4.21%) were detected at healthy sites, and gingivitis or necrotizing gingivitis samples. In the Virginiamycin Group, A. israelli (3.41%), domain Archaea (0.98%), F. nucleatum (9.27%), class Mollicutes(4.39%), P. endodontalis (4.39%), P. gulae (0.49%), P. buccae (8.29%), P. loescheii (6.83%), P. nigrescens (15.61%), P. oralis (1.46%), Selenomonas sputigena (0.49%), T. forsythia (0.49%), and T. denticola (2.44%) were detected. In conclusion, virginiamycin administered at a dosage of 340mg/animal/day significantly reduced the occurrence of gingivitis and necrotizing gingivitis in cattle maintained on reformed pastures, and was revealed to have action against periodontal bacterial microbiota considered to be potentially pathogenic.(AU)


As doenças periodontais são processos infecciosos multifatoriais causados por complexos de micro-organismos, que provocam danos à saúde, produção e ao bem-estar animal. O objetivo do presente estudo foi o de avaliar a eficácia da virginiamicina na prevenção e controle de duas formas de doença periodontal; a gengivite e a gengivite necrosante. Assim, dez bezerros desmamados, com idade entre 4 e 6 meses, foram mantidos permanentemente em lote único e sob o mesmo regime de pastejo rotacionado em área reformada de Panicum maximum. Cinco bezerros receberam via oral 340mg de virginiamicina (Grupo Virginiamicina) diariamente, por um período de dezoito semanas, enquanto o Grupo Controle permaneceu sob o mesmo manejo alimentar, mas sem receber a virginiamicina. No período, os animais passaram por 18 avaliações semanais quanto à saúde periodontal, com monitoramento e registro dos parâmetros clínicos dos oito dentes incisivos decíduos, nas suas faces labial e lingual. Em intervalos aproximadamente quinzenais foram realizadas nove coletas de material do sulco subgengival de cinco sítios de quatro dentes incisivos direitos de cada animal para avaliação microbiológica, com o emprego da reação em cadeia da polimerase e com iniciadores de 25 micro-organismos considerados potencialmente patogênicos. Ao final das 1440 avaliações clínicas periodontais dos dentes incisivos dos dez bezerros, pôde-se registrar um total de 395 episódios de dentes com gengivite, nos quais 267 foram registrados no Grupo Controle e 128 no Grupo Virginiamicina. De forma semelhante, do total de 89 registros de gengivite necrosante, 58 foram no Grupo Controle e 31 no Grupo Virginiamicina. Na comparação entre médias dos grupos as diferenças encontradas para dentes com gengivite e gengivite necrosante foram significativas pelo teste t (p<0,05). Assim, o total de dentes com gengivite (p<0,01) e gengivite necrosante (p<0,01) no Grupo Controle, foi significativamente superior ao de gengivite (p<0,01) e gengivite necrosante (p<0,05) do Grupo Virginiamicina. Houve correlação positiva entre o total de ocorrência de gengivite e gengivite necrosante no Grupo Virginiamicina pelo teste de Pearson. A virginiamicina possuiu um efeito protetor nos animais tratados em comparação com o controle (OR = 0,36: IC (95%) = 0,27-0,43). Na avaliação microbiológica do Grupo Controle foram detectados nas amostras de sítios sadios, com gengivite ou com gengivite necrosante Actinomyces israelli (4,74%), domínio Archaea (1,58%), Eikenella corrodens (1,05%), Fusobacterium nucleatum (27,37%), classe Mollicutes (5,26%), Porphyromonas endodontalis (5,26%), Porphyromonas gulae (0,53%), Prevotella buccae (6,32%), Prevotella loescheii (3,68%), Prevotella nigrescens (8,42%), Prevotella oralis (1,58%), Tannerella forsythia (0,53%) e Treponema denticola (4,21%). Enquanto no Grupo Virginiamicina foram detectados: A. israelli (3,41%), domínio Archaea (0,98%), F. nucleatum (9,27%), classe Mollicutes (4,39%), P. endodontalis (4,39%), P. gulae (0,49%), P. buccae (8,29%), P. loescheii (6,83%), P. nigrescens (15,61%), P. oralis (1,46%), Selenomonas sputigena (0,49%), T. forsythia (0,49%) e T. denticola (2,44%). Em conclusão, a virginiamicina administrada na dosagem de 340mg/animal/dia reduziu significativamente a ocorrência da gengivite e gengivite necrosante em bovinos mantidos em pastos reformados e revelou ter ação frente à microbiota bacteriana periodontal considerada potencialmente patogênica.(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Infant , Cattle , Periodontal Diseases/veterinary , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use , Gingivitis/veterinary
4.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 39(2): 73-80, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26818040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a degenerative neurological condition that results in impairments in multiple domains including cognition, fatigue, and mood. Dalfampridine-extended release (D-ER) has been approved to improve walking in persons with MS. It is plausible that D-ER could improve cognition, fatigue, and mood through the same mechanisms. We aim to examine effects of D-ER on cognition, depression, mood, and fatigue and to describe how these associations differ among those with and without D-ER related improvements in walking speed. METHODS: Patients with MS at the Mandell Center who were newly prescribed D-ER as part of their standard MS care were invited to participate in this observational pre-post study. Thirty-nine participants with MS were observed for 14 weeks; 31 remained on D-ER for 14 weeks or longer. Of these, 28 were then subdivided based on walk responder status. Cognition was assessed using the SDMT; depression was measured with the CESD. Self-reported cognition, mood, and fatigue were also measured using subscales of the Performance Scales (PS). RESULTS: Among those on drug through 14 weeks, there was significant improvement in the SDMT (P < 0.001) and the PS Fatigue score (P = 0.04). Among those who discontinued drug before 14 weeks, PS Cognition and PS Mood scores significantly improved (P = 0.02). Timed walk responders had significant improvements in SDMT (P < 0.001) and PS Fatigue (P = 0.046) from baseline to week 14. Among timed walk nonresponders, none of the measures significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: Dalfampridine-extended release may improve cognition and fatigue in persons with MS, especially among timed walk responders.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Fatigue/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Potassium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/etiology , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Self Report , Treatment Outcome , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
6.
J Chemother ; 27(6): 319-23, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112954

ABSTRACT

The aims of the present study were to evaluate erythromycin, clindamycin, and streptogramin resistance rates, as well as the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of erythromycin-resistant staphylococci in a Greek University Hospital. Macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B-type resistance was investigated by double disk diffusion and the D-zone testing, while Minimal inhibitory concentration determination was performed among 656 erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal clinical consecutive isolates, too. The presence of the major genetic determinants ermA, ermB, ermC, and msrA were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The overall erythromycin resistance rate was 49·70%. One hundred and forty-six of the 322 Staphylococcus aureus were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (45·34%), whereas 176 were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (54·66%). The macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B-type antibiotics (MLSB)-constitutive phenotype was detected in 126 S. aureus strains (88·7%), whereas the inducible MLSB resistance phenotype was demonstrated in 16 S. aureus (11·3%). The MS phenotype was not detected. ErmC was the most frequently encountered gene responsible for macrolide resistance among S. aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci in this hospital. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of SmaI DNA fragments revealed the presence of a single predominant clone among erythromycin-resistant S. aureus. The predominance of constitutive erythromycin resistance is a serious problem and limits the use of clindamycin for severe staphylococcal infections not only in this university hospital, but in many countries worldwide.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Erythromycin/pharmacology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptogramin B/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Erythromycin/therapeutic use , Genes, Bacterial , Genotype , Greece/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Streptogramin B/therapeutic use , Tertiary Healthcare , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
7.
Ann Pharmacother ; 49(1): 69-85, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25352037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the pharmacotherapy of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search was performed for the period 1946 to May 2014 using the search terms Enterococcus, enterococci, vancomycin-resistant, VRE, bacteremia, and bloodstream infection. References were also identified from selected review articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language case series, cohort studies, and meta-analyses assessing the options in the pharmacotherapy of VRE BSIs in adult patients were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies were identified that utilized linezolid, quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D), and daptomycin. In all, 8 comparative retrospective cohort studies, 2 meta-analyses of daptomycin and linezolid, and 3 retrospective comparisons of linezolid and Q/D were included for review. Mortality associated with VRE BSIs was high across studies, and the ability to determine differences in outcomes between agents was confounded by the complex nature of the patients included. Two meta-analyses comparing daptomycin with linezolid for VRE BSIs found modest advantages for linezolid, but these conclusions may be hampered by heterogeneity within the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: VRE BSIs remain a difficult-to-treat clinical situation. Differences in toxicity between the agents used to treat it are clear, but therapeutic differences are more difficult to discern. Meta-analyses suggest that a moderate advantage for linezolid over daptomycin may exist, but problems with the nature of studies that they included make definitive conclusions difficult.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Acetamides/pharmacology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Linezolid , Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/drug effects , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
8.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(9): 5269-79, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24957822

ABSTRACT

Streptogramin antibiotics are divided into types A and B, which in combination can act synergistically. We compared the molecular interactions of the streptogramin combinations Synercid (type A, dalfopristin; type B, quinupristin) and NXL 103 (type A, flopristin; type B, linopristin) with the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome by X-ray crystallography. We further analyzed the activity of the streptogramin components individually and in combination. The streptogramin A and B components in Synercid and NXL 103 exhibit synergistic antimicrobial activity against certain pathogenic bacteria. However, in transcription-coupled translation assays, only combinations that include dalfopristin, the streptogramin A component of Synercid, show synergy. Notably, the diethylaminoethylsulfonyl group in dalfopristin reduces its activity but is the basis for synergy in transcription-coupled translation assays before its rapid hydrolysis from the depsipeptide core. Replacement of the diethylaminoethylsulfonyl group in dalfopristin by a nonhydrolyzable group may therefore be beneficial for synergy. The absence of general streptogramin synergy in transcription-coupled translation assays suggests that the synergistic antimicrobial activity of streptogramins can occur independently of the effects of streptogramin on translation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Protein Biosynthesis/drug effects , Streptogramins/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Crystallography, X-Ray , Drug Combinations , Drug Synergism , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Haemophilus influenzae/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Ribosomes/drug effects , Ribosomes/ultrastructure , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptogramin A/administration & dosage , Streptogramin A/pharmacology , Streptogramin A/therapeutic use , Streptogramin B/administration & dosage , Streptogramin B/pharmacology , Streptogramin B/therapeutic use , Streptogramins/administration & dosage , Streptogramins/chemistry , Streptogramins/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/administration & dosage , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
10.
Int J Med Microbiol ; 304(1): 44-50, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119565

ABSTRACT

Streptogramins are potent drugs against numerous highly resistant pathogens and therefore are used as antibiotics of last-resort human therapy. They consist of a mixture of two different types of chemical substances - the group A streptogramins, which are polyunsaturated macrolactones, and the group B streptogramins, representing cyclic hexadepsipeptides. Streptogramins are unique in their mode of action: each component alone exhibits a moderate bacteriostatic activity by binding to the bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit and thereby blocking translation, whereas the synergic combination of both substances is up to hundred fold more effective than the single compounds, resulting in a bactericidal activity. The streptogramin biosynthetic genes are organized as large antibiotic superclusters. These clusters harbour numerous regulatory genes, which encode different types of regulators that together form a complex hierarchical signalling system, which governs the regulation of streptogramin biosynthesis. Resistance is also regulated by this cascade. However, whereas resistance against streptogramins is quite well understood in diverse pathogenic organisms, only little is known about how the natural producer strains protect themselves against these toxic compounds. Here, we give an overview about the recent advances in streptogramin investigations with a main focus on the best-studied representatives, pristinamycin and virginiamycin. We concentrate on the biosynthesis of these compounds, their regulation and resistance determinants as well as their application in medicine and food industry.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biosynthetic Pathways/genetics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Pristinamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/biosynthesis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Synergism , Food Industry , Humans , Pristinamycin/biosynthesis , Pristinamycin/chemistry , Pristinamycin/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/biosynthesis , Virginiamycin/chemistry , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
11.
Curr Rheumatol Rep ; 15(6): 332, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23591823

ABSTRACT

Septic arthritis is a rheumatologic emergency as joint destruction occurs rapidly and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis can be particularly challenging in patients with underlying inflammatory joint disease. This review outlines the risk factors for septic arthritis and summarizes the causative bacterial organisms. We highlight advances in antibiotic management with a focus on new drugs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and discuss the use of adjunctive therapies for treatment of septic arthritis in adults.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Infectious/diagnosis , Arthritis, Infectious/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Linezolid , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use , Ceftaroline
13.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 45(3): 565-76, 2011 Jul.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21935792

ABSTRACT

After the report of first case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 1961, MRSA become a major problem worldwide. Over the last decade MRSA strains have emerged as serious pathogens in nosocomial and community settings. Glycopeptides (vancomycin and teicoplanin) are still the current mainstay of therapy for infections caused by MRSA. In the last decade dramatic changes have occurred in the epidemiology of MRSA infections. The isolates with reduced susceptibility and in vitro resistance to vancomycin have emerged. Recently, therapeutic alternatives such as quinupristin/dalfopristin, linezolid, tigecycline and daptomycin have been introduced into clinical practice for treating MRSA infections. Nevertheless, these drugs are only approved for certain indication and resistance has already been reported. In this review, the new information on novel drugs for treating MRSA infections and the resistance mechanisms of these drugs were discussed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Acetamides/pharmacology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Linezolid , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Minocycline/pharmacology , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Protein Synthesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Teicoplanin/pharmacology , Teicoplanin/therapeutic use , Tigecycline , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Vancomycin Resistance , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
14.
Vet Microbiol ; 152(3-4): 424-8, 2011 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21676560

ABSTRACT

Enterococcus faecium, a major cause of potentially life-threatening hospital-acquired human infections, can be resistant to several antimicrobials, such that streptogramin quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q/D) is one of the few antibiotics still effective. Consequently use of the streptogramin virginiamycin as an animal growth promoter was banned in the EU in 1999 as some believed this contributed to the emergence of Q/D resistant E. faecium. Virginiamycin is advocated for preventing equine pasture-associated laminitis, but its effect on equine faecal bacterial Q/D resistance has not been determined. Faecal samples were obtained from horses receiving virginiamycin, horses co-grazing and horses not exposed to virginiamycin. Streptogramin resistant E. faecium were cultured from 70% (21/30) of animals treated with virginiamycin, 75% (18/24) of co-grazing animals and 69% (11/16) of animals not exposed. ermB and vatD genes were detected using real time PCR in 63% and 66% of animals treated with virginiamycin, 75% and 71% of co-grazing animals and 63% and 69% of animals not exposed. Antimicrobial resistance genes were present only in samples which had cultured Q/D resistant E. faecium. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to antimicrobial resistance. The gene load of vatD was significantly (p=0.04) greater in unexposed animals compared to those treated with virginiamycin. The use of virginiamycin to prevent pasture-associated laminitis does not appear to be related to an increased Q/D resistance frequency. However, in view of the high frequency of resistance within all groups, the horse is a reservoir of Q/D resistant genes and clones that potentially could be transferred transiently to humans.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Foot Diseases/veterinary , Horse Diseases/prevention & control , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use , Animals , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Enterococcus faecium/genetics , Foot Diseases/prevention & control , Horses , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
15.
Pharmacogenomics ; 11(9): 1193-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20860457

ABSTRACT

The last decade saw an alarming increase in antibiotic resistance in infections, with more than 13 million deaths per year from infections. Counter strategies include hygiene, antibiotic restriction and new antibiotics such as quinupristin, linezolid, tigecycline, daptomycin and dalbavancin. Presently, pharmacogenomics with basic research is revealing new antimicrobial peptides and is applying old drugs in new ways to break resistance. New approaches with host-directed drug targeting emerge to circumvent resistance. A future systems perspective from large-scale molecular techniques and bioinformatic modeling allows pharmacogenomics to reveal new intervention angles. This includes the fight against resistance and its transmission, improved vaccines, disarmament of microbes and antibiotic options from novel molecular targets (lipids, RNA and carbohydrates). Such a system perspective is also essential for improved diagnostics and individualized medicine. However, an increase in public awareness and closer cooperation of industry and basic research are essential to turn research into powerful new drugs that will enable us to treat new arising infections in the future.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Microbial/genetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Acetamides/pharmacology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/genetics , Computational Biology , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Forecasting , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Cocci/drug effects , Humans , Linezolid , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Minocycline/pharmacology , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Pharmacogenetics/trends , Systems Biology , Tigecycline , Virginiamycin/analogs & derivatives , Virginiamycin/pharmacology , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
16.
Scand J Infect Dis ; 42(6-7): 491-9, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20524781

ABSTRACT

Quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid are widely used for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) infections. Increasing resistance of VREF to quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid is a cause for concern. To determine the efficacy of and the rate of development of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid, we analyzed all episodes of clinically significant VREF bacteraemia at a tertiary-care hospital from January 2003 to June 2007. The main outcomes were rates of 30-day mortality, microbiological response, and development of resistance. Fifty-two patients were treated with quinupristin-dalfopristin and 61 were treated with linezolid. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant between-group differences in 30-day mortality (48% in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group vs 41% in the linezolid group; p = 0.45) or microbiological response (60% vs 66%; p = 0.51). However, prolonged bacteraemia (18% of 45 evaluable cases vs 4% of 55 evaluable cases; p = 0.04) and development of resistance in blood isolates (11% vs 0%; p = 0.02) were more frequently observed in the quinupristin-dalfopristin group than in the linezolid group. There was no significant difference between the efficacy of quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid. However, prolonged bacteraemia and the development of resistance were more common in quinupristin-dalfopristin-treated patients.


Subject(s)
Acetamides/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Vancomycin Resistance/drug effects , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use , Acetamides/adverse effects , Acetamides/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Linezolid , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Oxazolidinones/adverse effects , Oxazolidinones/pharmacology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Virginiamycin/adverse effects , Virginiamycin/pharmacology
17.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 23(4): 965-82, ix, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19909893

ABSTRACT

An overview of the mechanism of action, dosing, clinical indications, and toxicities of the glycopeptide vancomycin is provided. The emerging gram-positive bacterial resistance to antimicrobials and its mechanisms are reviewed. Strategies to control this emergence of resistance are expected to be proposed. Newer antimicrobial agents that have activity against vancomycin-resistant organisms are now available and play a critical role in the treatment of life-threatening infections.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Glycopeptides/therapeutic use , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Peptides, Cyclic/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Humans , Lipoglycopeptides , Teicoplanin/analogs & derivatives , Teicoplanin/therapeutic use , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
18.
Infection ; 37(6): 540-3, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19669085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Earlier reports have shown a high mortality of invasive infection due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF). Most of these studies have been conducted in US hospitals prior to the advent of newer VREF-active antimicrobials, and the reported poor outcomes have been explained by the limited choices for effective antimicrobial therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 25 cases of invasive VREF infection were seen during an outbreak in a tertiary care hospital. Patient characteristics and outcomes were evaluated by a structured retrospective chart review and descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Severe underlying diseases such as leukemia not in remission (86%) were highly prevalent among patients with invasive VREF infection. Fifty-two percent of underlying diseases and/or comorbidities were considered according to the McCabe classification as rapidly fatal. Most patients had received high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy, and many were neutropenic at the onset of VREF infection. Concomitant infection due to other organisms was found in 48% of the patients. All patients had received extensive antibiotic treatment prior to the onset of VREF infection. Resistance to linezolid was observed in four cases. Overall survival at day 30 was 48%. Four deaths were considered to be directly related to VREF infection. CONCLUSION: Invasive VREF infection during this outbreak was confined to patients with severe underlying comorbidity. The mortality of VREF infection remained high, despite treatment with newer VREF-active antibiotics such as linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Enterococcus faecium/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Enterococcus faecium/isolation & purification , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/mortality , Hospitals , Humans , Linezolid , Male , Middle Aged , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vancomycin Resistance , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
19.
Contrib Nephrol ; 163: 169-176, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19494611

ABSTRACT

Peritonitis remains a major complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. The most recent ISPD guidelines for the empiric initial treatment of peritonitis recommend the use of antibiotics that provide coverage against Gram-positive organisms (vancomycin or cefazolin) and Gram-negative organisms (a third-generation cephalosporin or an aminoglycoside). However, there are some situations in which this regimen may not be desirable. Concerns of resistant organisms, changing microbiology, drug toxicity, or difficulties administering therapy may lead a provider to modify the initial regimen. Drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and Enterococcus strains may require administration of newer agents such as linezolid, quinipristin/dalfopristin, or daptomycin. Many centers have reported that, over time, the microbiology at those institutions has been changing. Some centers have reported a significant decrease in gram positive organisms and increase in extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) organisms. It is important for each center to examine its microbiology to document such trends. Although the currently recommended therapies have low toxicities, it is possible that concerns for untoward side effects in an individual patient may dictate changing the regimen. Finally, there is evidence from many prospective studies that monotherapy with different agents (oral quinolones or cefepime) is efficacious; if ease of therapy is a consideration, these may also be appropriate agents.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritonitis/drug therapy , Peritonitis/microbiology , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Humans , Linezolid , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , Virginiamycin/analogs & derivatives , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
20.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 33(6): 564-8, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19233622

ABSTRACT

Following an initial response to vancomycin therapy, a patient with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia developed endocarditis, failed a second course of vancomycin and then failed daptomycin therapy. An increase in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of four consecutive MRSA blood isolates from 2 microg/mL to 8 microg/mL was shown by Etest. Population analysis of four successive blood culture isolates recovered over the 10-week period showed that the MRSA strain became progressively less susceptible to both vancomycin and daptomycin. Retrospectively, the macro Etest method using teicoplanin indicated a decrease in vancomycin susceptibility in the second blood isolate. The patient improved after treatment with various courses of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid. Early detection of vancomycin-heteroresistant S. aureus isolates, which appeared to have clinical significance in this case, continues to be a challenge for the clinical laboratory. Development of suitable practical methods for this should be given priority. Concurrent development of resistance to vancomycin and daptomycin, whilst rare, must be considered in a patient who is unresponsive to daptomycin following vancomycin therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Acetamides/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Humans , Linezolid , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Oxazolidinones/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Virginiamycin/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL