Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 147
Filter
1.
Gut ; 73(6): 955-965, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286589

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend long-term image-based surveillance for patients with low-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). This simulation study aimed to examine the comparative cost-effectiveness of continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages and define the optimal age to stop surveillance. DESIGN: We constructed a Markov model with a lifetime horizon to simulate the clinical course of patients with IPMNs receiving imaging-based surveillance. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages to stop surveillance, stratified by sex and IPMN types (branch-duct vs mixed-type). We determined the optimal age to stop surveillance as the lowest age at which the ICER exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year. To estimate model parameters, we used a clinical cohort of 3000 patients with IPMNs and a national database including 40 166 patients with pancreatic cancer receiving pancreatectomy as well as published data. RESULTS: In male patients, the optimal age to stop surveillance was 76-78 years irrespective of the IPMN types, compared with 70, 73, 81, and 84 years for female patients with branch-duct IPMNs <20 mm, =20-29 mm, ≥30 mm and mixed-type IPMNs, respectively. The suggested ages became younger according to an increasing level of comorbidities. In cases with high comorbidity burden, the ICERs were above the willingness-to-pay threshold irrespective of sex and the size of branch-duct IPMNs. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of long-term IPMN surveillance depended on sex, IPMN types, and comorbidity levels, suggesting the potential to personalise patient management from the health economic perspective.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Markov Chains , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Humans , Aged , Female , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/economics , Age Factors , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/economics , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Watchful Waiting/economics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/economics
2.
Surgery ; 171(1): 190-196, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate exists over the optimal management of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. The American Thyroid Association supports the concept of active surveillance to manage low-risk papillary thyroid cancer; however, the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance has not yet been established. We sought to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing active surveillance versus surgical intervention for patients in the United States. METHODS: A Markov decision tree model was developed to compare active surveillance and thyroid lobectomy. Our reference case is a 40-year-old female who was diagnosed with unifocal (<15 mm), low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Probabilistic outcomes, costs, and health utilities were determined using an extensive literature review. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $50,000/quality-adjusted life year gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty in the model's variables. RESULTS: Lobectomy provided a final effectiveness of 21.7/quality-adjusted life years, compared with 17.3/quality-adjusted life years for active surveillance. Furthermore, incremental cost effectiveness ratio for lobectomy versus active surveillance was $19,560/quality-adjusted life year (

Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/therapy , Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Thyroidectomy/statistics & numerical data , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/economics , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/mortality , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroid Neoplasms/economics , Thyroid Neoplasms/mortality , Thyroidectomy/economics , Thyroidectomy/methods , United States/epidemiology , Watchful Waiting/economics
3.
Radiology ; 300(3): 594-604, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254851

ABSTRACT

Background Active surveillance (AS) is the recommended treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Surveillance varies in MRI, frequency of follow-up, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score that would repeat biopsy. Purpose To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AS strategies for low-risk PC with versus without MRI. Materials and Methods This study developed a mathematical model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies in a simulation of men with a diagnosis of low-risk PC. The following strategies were compared: watchful waiting, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and annual biopsy without MRI, and PSA testing and MRI with varied PI-RADS thresholds for biopsy. MRI strategies differed regarding scheduling and use of PI-RADS score of at least 3, or a PI-RADS score of at least 4 to indicate the need for biopsy. Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated by using microsimulation. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the impact of varying parameter values on results. Results For the base case of 60-year-old men, all strategies incorporating prostate MRI extended QALYs and life-years compared with watchful waiting and non-MRI strategies. Annual MRI strategies yielded 16.19 QALYs, annual biopsy with no MRI yielded 16.14 QALYs, and watchful waiting yielded 15.94 QALYs. Annual MRI with PI-RADS score of at least 3 or of at least 4 as the biopsy threshold and annual MRI with biopsy even after MRI with negative findings offered similar QALYs and the same unadjusted life expectancy: 23.05 life-years. However, a PI-RADS score of at least 4 yielded 42% fewer lifetime biopsies. With a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100 000 per QALY, annual MRI with biopsy for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater was most cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $67 221 per QALY). Age, treatment type, risk of initial grade misclassification, and quality-of-life impact of procedural complications affected results. Conclusion The use of active surveillance (AS) with biopsy decisions guided by findings from annual MRI reduces the number of biopsies while preserving life expectancy and quality of life. Biopsy in lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater is likely the most cost-effective AS strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer who are younger than 70 years. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on July 13, 2021.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Watchful Waiting/economics , Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
4.
J Surg Res ; 264: 37-44, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765509

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The frequency and cost of postoperative surveillance for older adults (>65 y) with T1N0M0 low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) have not been well studied. METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare (2006-2013) database, frequency and cost of surveillance concordant with American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines (defined as an office visit, ≥1 thyroglobulin measurement, and ultrasound 6- to 24-month postoperatively) were analyzed for the overall cohort of single-surgery T1N0M0 low-risk PTC, stratified by lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy. RESULTS: Majority of 2097 patients in the study were white (86.7%) and female (77.5%). Median age and tumor size were 72 y (interquartile range 68-76) and 0.6 cm (interquartile range 0.3-1.1 cm), respectively; 72.9% of patients underwent total thyroidectomy. Approximately 77.5% of patients had a postoperative surveillance visit; however, only 15.9% of patients received ATA-concordant surveillance. Patients who underwent total thyroidectomy as compared with lobectomy were more likely to undergo surveillance testing, thyroglobulin (61.7% versus 24.8%) and ultrasound (37.5% versus 29.2%) (all P < 0.01), and receive ATA-concordant surveillance (18.5% versus 9.0%, P < 0.001). Total surveillance cost during the study period was $621,099. Diagnostic radioactive iodine, ablation, and advanced imaging (such as positron emission tomography scans) accounted for 55.5% of costs ($344,692), whereas ATA-concordant care accounted for 44.5% of costs. After multivariate adjustment, patients who underwent total thyroidectomy as compared with lobectomy were twice as likely to receive ATA-concordant surveillance (adjusted odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of older adults with T1N0M0 low-risk PTC do not receive ATA-concordant surveillance; discordant care was costly. Total thyroidectomy was the strongest predictor of receiving ATA-concordant care.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/surgery , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroidectomy/statistics & numerical data , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Male , Medicare/economics , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Neoplasm Staging , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Positron-Emission Tomography/standards , Positron-Emission Tomography/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Care/economics , Postoperative Care/standards , Postoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Thyroglobulin/blood , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/blood , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/diagnosis , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/economics , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroid Neoplasms/blood , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Neoplasms/economics , Thyroidectomy/methods , Ultrasonography/economics , Ultrasonography/standards , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data , United States , Watchful Waiting/economics , Watchful Waiting/standards
5.
CMAJ Open ; 9(1): E125-E133, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622765

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many refugees and asylum seekers from countries where schistosomiasis is endemic are infected with the Schistosoma parasite when they arrive in Canada. We assessed, from a systemic perspective, which of the following management strategies by health care providers is cost-effective: testing for schistosomiasis and treating if the individual is infected, treating presumptively or waiting for symptoms to emerge. METHODS: We constructed a decision-tree model to examine the cost-effectiveness of 3 management strategies: watchful waiting, screening and treatment, and presumptive treatment. We obtained data for the model from the literature and other sources, to predict deaths and chronic complications caused by schistosomiasis, as well as costs and net monetary benefit. RESULTS: Presumptive treatment was cost-saving if the prevalence of schistosomiasis in the target population was greater than 2.1%. In our baseline analysis, presumptive treatment was associated with an increase of 0.156 quality-adjusted life years and a cost saving of $405 per person, compared with watchful waiting. It was also more effective and less costly than screening and treatment. INTERPRETATION: Among recently resettled refugees and asylum claimants in Canada, from countries where schistosomiasis is endemic, presumptive treatment was predicted to be less costly and more effective than watchful waiting or screening and treatment. Our results support a revision of the current Canadian recommendations.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Praziquantel/therapeutic use , Refugees , Schistosomiasis/diagnosis , Schistosomiasis/drug therapy , Anthelmintics/economics , Asymptomatic Infections/therapy , Canada , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Praziquantel/economics , Prevalence , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Schistosomiasis/economics , Schistosomiasis/epidemiology , Watchful Waiting/economics
6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 41(4): 332-341, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33547823

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a surveillance protocol in managing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection receiving rituximab. DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm study. SETTING: National Cancer Centre, Singapore. PATIENTS: Lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection and scheduled to receive rituximab-based treatment. INTERVENTION: Close monitoring of HBV DNA levels, ie. every 4-6 weeks during rituximab treatment, every 6-8 weeks in the first year post-treatment, and every 3-4 months in the second year post-treatment. MEASUREMENTS: The efficacy of the surveillance protocol was examined by evaluating the rates of reactivation-related events. Feasibility was evaluated based on patient adherence. An economic analysis using a cost-minimization approach was conducted to compare the costs between the surveillance protocol and universal prophylaxis with entecavir 0.5 mg daily up to 1 year after cessation of rituximab. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 66 patients provided analyzable data with a follow-up period of 966.6 months. No hepatitis flare or reactivation-related events were detected. The median adherence rate to the surveillance protocol was 90.5%. Cost savings of US$946.40 per patient over the entire surveillance period were achieved if the surveillance protocol was adopted and was most affected by changes in prophylaxis duration and the cost of antiviral prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The surveillance protocol is an effective, feasible and cost-saving strategy to manage HBV reactivation among lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection receiving rituximab.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B , Lymphoma , Rituximab , Watchful Waiting , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B virus/physiology , Humans , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Lymphoma/virology , Prospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Virus Activation , Watchful Waiting/economics
7.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(4): e13975, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33481355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a stable, inotrope-dependent pediatric patient with dilated cardiomyopathy, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of continuous-flow VAD implantation compared to a watchful waiting approach using chronic inotropic therapy. METHODS: We used a state-transition model to estimate the costs and outcomes of 14-year-old (INTERMACS profile 3) patients receiving either VAD or watchful waiting. We measured benefits in terms of lifetime QALYs gained. Model inputs were taken from the literature. We calculated the ICER, or the cost per additional QALY gained, of VADs and performed multiple sensitivity analyses to test how our assumptions influenced the results. RESULTS: Compared to watchful waiting, VADs produce 0.97 more QALYs for an additional $156 639, leading to an ICER of $162 123 per QALY gained from a healthcare perspective. VADs have 17% chance of being cost-effective given a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses suggest that VADs can be cost-effective if the costs of implantation decrease or if hospitalization costs or mortality among watchful waiting patients is higher. CONCLUSIONS: As a bridge to transplant, VADs provide a health benefit to children who develop stable, inotrope-dependent heart failure, but immediate implantation is not yet a cost-effective strategy compared to watchful waiting based on commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Early VAD support can be cost-effective in sicker patients and if device implantation is cheaper. In complex conditions such as pediatric heart failure, cost-effectiveness should be just one of many factors that inform clinical decision-making.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/economics , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices/economics , Adolescent , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/drug therapy , Cardiotonic Agents/economics , Cardiotonic Agents/therapeutic use , Computer Simulation , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , United States , Watchful Waiting/economics
8.
Surg Today ; 51(4): 550-560, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935208

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To propose a new and improved surveillance schedule for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients by focusing on the recurrence rate, resectability, and especially, the tumor doubling time (DT) of recurrent tumors. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective review were 1774 consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for stage I-III CRC between January, 2004 and December, 2015. We calculated the DT by measuring the tumor diameter using computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The median DT for recurrences in the liver, lung, peritoneum, and other locations were 35, 72, 85, and 36 days, respectively, (p < 0.001) and tumor growth rates differed according to the organs where recurrence developed. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the DT was strongly associated with the relapse-free interval from primary surgery (p < 0.001), and that the DT in patients with recurrence detected ≥ 3 years after primary surgery was longer by 151.1 days than that in patients with recurrence detected within 1 year after primary surgery. We proposed a less intensive surveillance, which achieved an average cost reduction of 32.5% compared with conventional surveillance in Japan. CONCLUSION: We propose a new and more cost-efficient surveillance schedule for CRC surgery patients in the clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Watchful Waiting/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Female , Humans , Japan , Linear Models , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Neoplasm Staging , Time Factors
9.
J Urol ; 205(1): 115-121, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32658588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Optimal treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer remains unclear. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines recommend active surveillance, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Recent trials demonstrated no difference in prostate cancer specific mortality for men undergoing active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer compared to prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The use of active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer is less clear. In this study we characterize U.S. national trends for demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with active surveillance for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 176,122 men diagnosed with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016 in the National Cancer Database. Temporal trends in demographic, clinical and socioeconomic factors among men with intermediate risk prostate cancer and association with the use of active surveillance were characterized. The analysis was performed in April 2020. RESULTS: In total, 176,122 men were identified with intermediate risk prostate cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these men 57.3% underwent prostatectomy, 36.4% underwent radiotherapy and 3.2% underwent active surveillance. Active surveillance nearly tripled from 1.6% in 2010 to 4.6% in 2016 (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis use of active surveillance was associated with older age, diagnosis in recent years, lower Gleason score and tumor stage, type of insurance, treatment at an academic center and proximity to facility, and attaining higher education (p <0.05). Race and comorbidities were not associated with active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight increasing active surveillance use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer demonstrating clinical and socioeconomic disparities. Prospective data and improved risk stratification are needed to guide optimal treatment for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Kallikreins/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatectomy/economics , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiotherapy/economics , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Watchful Waiting/economics
10.
Breast ; 54: 272-277, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33242753

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic parameters of breast ultrasound (US) in the setting of routine radiological surveillance after a diagnosis of breast cancer and evaluate costs of the inclusion of breast US as well as any survival benefit of US detected cases of recurrence in surveillance. METHODS: 622 patients underwent breast cancer surgery and follow up at Austin Health from July 2009 to December 2015. Retrospective data analysis was performed to determine; diagnostic parameters, financial costs of US and survival outcomes of US detected cases of recurrence. RESULTS: Patients underwent 1-9 years of breast cancer surveillance, with a median of 4.24 years. 390 (62.7%) patients underwent additional breast US surveillance to mammography. 232 (38.3%) fit criteria for use of additional breast US. 199 abnormal imaging episodes occurred, leading to 16 screen detected-cases of locoregional recurrence. US alone generated 107 abnormal images and found 9 cancers. US had a sensitivity of 44.1%, specificity of 95.2% and positive predictive value of 11.7% in comparison to mammography; 20.6%, 97.4% and 9.9% respectively. US had a biopsy rate of 4.0% and lead to an incremental cancer detection rate of 0.38%. The cost of incremental cancer found was $31,463.72 AUD. Survival outcomes based on method of detection of recurrence were insignificant (p value = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Breast US has a sensitivity of 44.1% and detected seven recurrences that were mammographically occult. Breast US has a similar PPV to mammography in surveillance. Breast US generated considerable biopsy rates and costs. Survival analysis was not able to detect any benefit of US detected cases of recurrence.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Mammary/economics , Watchful Waiting/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy/economics , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Watchful Waiting/methods , Young Adult
11.
Future Oncol ; 16(36): 3061-3074, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902306

ABSTRACT

Background: Prior studies have established that broader incorporation of active surveillance, guided by additional prognostic tools, may mitigate the growing economic burden of localized prostate cancer in the USA. This study sought to further explore the potential of a particular gene expression-based prognostic tool to address this unmet need. Materials & methods: A deterministic, decision-analytic model was developed to estimate the economic impact of the Prolaris® test on a US commercial health plan. Results & conclusion: When adopted in patients classified by the American Urological Association as low or intermediate risk, the assay was projected to reduce costs by $1894 and $2129 per patient over 3 and 10 years, respectively, largely through the increased use of active surveillance.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cost Savings , Gene Expression Profiling/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Watchful Waiting/economics , Aftercare/economics , Androgen Antagonists/economics , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biopsy , Cell Cycle/genetics , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Computer Simulation , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Gene Expression Profiling/instrumentation , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Male , Models, Economic , Prognosis , Prostate/pathology , Prostate/surgery , Prostatectomy/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/economics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics , Risk Assessment/economics , Risk Assessment/methods , United States , Watchful Waiting/methods
13.
Obstet Gynecol ; 136(1): 19-25, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541288

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the actual health-system cost of elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation with expectant management. METHODS: This was an economic analysis of patients enrolled in the five Utah hospitals participating in a multicenter randomized trial of elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. The entire trial enrolled more than 6,000 patients. For this subset, 1,201 had cost data available. The primary outcome was relative direct health care costs of maternal and neonatal care from a health system perspective. Secondary outcomes included the costs of each phase of maternal and neonatal care. Direct health system costs of maternal and neonatal care were measured using advanced costing analytics from the time of randomization at 38 weeks of gestation until exit from the study up to 8 weeks postpartum. Costs in each randomization arm were compared using generalized linear models and reported as the relative cost of induction compared with expectant management. With a fixed sample size, we had adequate power to detect a 7.3% or greater difference in overall costs. RESULTS: The total cost of elective induction was no different than expectant management (mean difference +4.7%; 95% CI -2.1% to +12.0%; P=.18). Maternal outpatient antenatal care costs were 47.0% lower in the induction arm (95% CI -58.3% to -32.6%; P<.001). Maternal inpatient intrapartum and delivery care costs, conversely, were 16.9% higher among women undergoing labor induction (95% CI +5.5% to +29.5%; P=.003). Maternal inpatient postpartum care, maternal outpatient care after discharge, neonatal hospital care, and neonatal care after discharge did not differ between arms. CONCLUSION: Total costs of elective labor induction and expectant management did not differ significantly. These results challenge the assumption that elective induction of labor leads to significant cost escalation.


Subject(s)
Labor, Induced/economics , Watchful Waiting/economics , Adult , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Labor, Obstetric , Maternal-Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Parity , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Utah , Young Adult
14.
J Endocrinol Invest ; 43(11): 1645-1654, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32307641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A trial-based comparison of the use of resources, costs and health utility outcomes of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), and watchful observation for incidental small (< 2 cm) thyroid nodules was performed using data from the randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Using data from 314 patients, healthcare-related use of resources, costs, health utility, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated at 12 months after first presentation of incidental thyroid nodule(s) on an intention-to-treat basis with adjustment for covariates. Uncertainty about the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for FNAC versus watchful management at 12 months of follow-up was incorporated using bootstrapping. Multiple imputation methods were used to deal with missing data. RESULTS: FNAC management was associated with greater use of healthcare resources and mean direct healthcare costs per patient (US$542.47 vs US$411.55). Lower mean 12-month QALYs per patient in FNAC was observed in comparison to watchful observation (0.752 versus 0.758). The probability that FNAC management was cost-effective compared with watchful management at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US50,000 per QALY gained was 26.5%. CONCLUSION: Based on 12-month data from RCT, watchful observation appeared cost-saving compared to FNAC in patients with incidental thyroid nodules that have a low-suspicion sonographic pattern and measure between 1.0 and 2.0 cm from healthcare provider perspective. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02398721.


Subject(s)
Cytodiagnosis/economics , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Watchful Waiting/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/economics , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/statistics & numerical data , China/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Cytodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidental Findings , Male , Middle Aged , Thyroid Nodule/economics , Thyroid Nodule/epidemiology , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data
16.
Urol J ; 17(5): 462-468, 2020 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207140

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy (MET) versus observation for large distal ureteral stones in China and provide preliminary evidence for the determination of the course of MET by mathematical estimation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With linear success rate assumptions, a decision tree was constructed by TreeAge Pro 2011 software. The stones passage rates after observation or receiving 0.4 mg daily tamsulosin were estimated according to a large randomized clinical trial (RCT). The costs of ureteroscopy, drugs and examinations were estimated according to related price from pharmacies or hospitals, or the guidance price published by the government. MET was also compared with observation by the sensitivity analysis. The effectiveness of MET or observation was presented by quality-adjusted life-day. Mathematical estimation of stone expulsion time was made by using a decision-analytic Markov model under the assumption that the daily stone expulsion probability is constant. RESULTS: In China, the MET was associated with a $295.1 cost advantage over observation. The cost of ureteroscopy has to decrease to $77.8 to reach cost equivalence between observation and MET. Observation is cost-effective only if ureteroscopy is very cheap or the difference of stone expulsion rates is insignificant. The estimated expulsion time was much longer than those reported in above mentioned RCT. CONCLUSION: Due to the high cost of ureteroscopy, MET showed a cost advantage over observation in treating distal ureteral stones in China. The daily stone passage rate was inconstant. More studies are needed to find the appropriate duration of MET.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Tamsulosin/therapeutic use , Ureteral Calculi/drug therapy , Ureteral Calculi/economics , China , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Models, Statistical , Ureteral Calculi/pathology , Watchful Waiting/economics
17.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(5): 598-605, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32032202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the costs of the current treatment strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer, in which patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy are treated in a watch-and-wait policy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to present the oncological outcome and hospital costs of patients with a complete response after chemoradiotherapy (watch-and-wait policy) and patients with an incomplete response after chemoradiotherapy (total mesorectal excision). DESIGN: This was a cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at an academic and a nonacademic hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received either a watch-and-wait policy or total mesorectal excision depending on their clinical response to chemoradiotherapy. INTERVENTIONS: Watch-and-wait policy and total mesorectal excision were the treatments applied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were overall, local recurrence-free, and distant metastasis-free survival and hospital costs over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were included. Mean age was 65.1 years, and 64.7% were men. One hundred five patients were included in the watch-and-wait subgroup, and 187 patients were in the total mesorectal excision subgroup. Both subgroups showed good oncological outcomes. Hospital costs consisted of 5 categories: costs of primary surgery, costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs of examinations, costs of additional surgery, and costs of treatment of regrowth/metastasis. The mean costs per patient were &OV0556;6713 (watch-and-wait subgroup) and &OV0556;17,108 (total mesorectal excision subgroup) over the first 2 years. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the following: costs were only from a hospital perspective, follow-up was 2 years, the study was retrospective in part, and there was no comparative study. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival was good in both subgroups and comparable to literature. The mean costs per patient differ between the watch-and-wait subgroup (&OV0556;6713) and the total mesorectal excision subgroup (&OV0556;17,108). No comparison between the groups could be made. Based on the results of this study, the current strategy, where patients with a clinical complete response are treated in a watch-and-wait policy, and patients with an incomplete response are treated with total mesorectal excision, is likely to be (cost)saving. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B177. RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS Y COSTOS HOSPITALARIOS EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE PACIENTES CON CANCER DE RECTO: ACTITUD DE ESPERA-VIGILANCIA Y TRATAMIENTO QUIRÚRGICO ESTANDARD: Se sabe poco sobre el costo del tratamiento actual en casos de cancer de recto localmente avanzado, cuando se aplica una política de vigilancia y espera en aquellos pacientes que presentan una respuesta clínica completa después de radio-quimioterapia.El propósito final del presente estudio es dar a conocer el resultado oncológico y los costos hospitalarios de los pacientes que presentan una respuesta clínica completa después de radio-quimioterapia (actitud de vigilancia-espera) y los pacientes con una respuesta incompleta después luego de radio-quimioterapia (excisión total del mesorrecto-ETM).Estudio de cohortes.Hospitales académicos y no académicos.Todos aquellos pacientes tratados por un cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y que fueron seguidos con una política de vigilancia y espera o la ETM, en función de la respuesta clínica a la radio-quimioterapia.Políticas de vigilancia-espera, excisión total del mesorrecto.Sobrevida global libre de recurrencia local, metástasis a distancia, sobrevida libre de enfermedad y costos hospitalarios durante un período de seguimiento de dos años.Se incluyeron 292 pacientes diagnosticados de cancer de recto localmente avanzado. La edad media fue de 65,1 años, 64,7% eran de sexo masculino. Se incluyeron 105 pacientes en el subgrupo de vigilancia-espera, y 187 en el subgrupo de excisión total del mesorrecto. Ambos subgrupos mostraron optimos resultados oncológicos. Los costos hospitalarios se dividieron en cinco categorías: costos de cirugía primaria; costos de quimioterapia adyuvante; costos de exámenes; costos de cirugía adicional; y costos del tratamiento de rebrote / metástasis. Los costos medios por paciente fueron de &OV0556; 6.713 (subgrupo de espera-vigilancia) y &OV0556; 17.108 (subgrupo de excisión total del mesorrecto) durante los primeros dos años.Analisis de costos desde una perspectiva hospitalaria durante un seguimiento de dos años, estudio parcialmente retrospectivo, no comparativo.La sobrevida general fue optima en ambos subgrupos y comparable con la literatura. El costo promedio por paciente difiere entre el subgrupo de vigilancia y espera (&OV0556; 6.713) con el subgrupo de la ETM(&OV0556; 17.108). No se pudieron comparar definitivamente ambos grupos. Basados en los resultados del presente estudio, es probable que la estrategia actual, en la que los pacientes con respuesta clínica completa sean tratados con una política de vigilancia y espera, presenten muy probablemente un cierto ahorro en el costo con relación a los pacientes con una respuesta incompleta tratados con excisión total del mesorrecto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B177. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Proctectomy/economics , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting/economics , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/economics , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 112(8): 792-801, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31930400

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is interest in deescalating local therapy after a clinical complete response to CRT. We hypothesized that a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy offers comparable cancer-specific survival, superior quality-adjusted survival, and reduced cost compared with upfront TME. METHODS: We developed a decision-analytic model to compare WW, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection for patients achieving a clinical complete response to CRT. Rates of local regrowth, pelvic recurrence, and distant metastasis were derived from series comparing WW with TME after pathologic complete response. Lifetime incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were calculated between strategies, and sensitivity analyses were performed to study model uncertainty. RESULTS: The base case 5-year cancer-specific survival was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 91.5% to 94.9%) on a WW program compared with 95.9% (95% CI = 93.6% to 97.4%) after upfront TME. WW was dominant relative to low anterior resection, with cost savings of $28 500 (95% CI = $22 200 to $39 000) and incremental QALY of 0.527 (95% CI = 0.138 to 1.125). WW was also dominant relative to abdominoperineal resection, with a cost savings of $32 100 (95% CI = $21 800 to $49 200) and incremental QALY of 0.601 (95% CI = 0.213 to 1.208). WW remained dominant in sensitivity analysis unless the rate of surgical salvage fell to 73.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Using current multi-institutional recurrence estimates, we observed comparable cancer-specific survival, superior quality-adjusted survival, and decreased costs with WW compared with upfront TME. Upfront TME was preferred when surgical salvage rates were low.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting , Adenocarcinoma/economics , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/economics , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/mortality , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/economics , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/economics , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Registries , Remission Induction , Salvage Therapy/economics , Salvage Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Watchful Waiting/economics , Watchful Waiting/statistics & numerical data
19.
Surgery ; 167(1): 110-116, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31543327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is a subtype of thyroid cancer that may be managed with active surveillance rather than immediate surgery. Active surveillance decreases complication rates and may decrease health care costs. This study aims to analyze complication rates of thyroid surgery, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma recurrence, and survival rates. Additionally, the costs of surgery versus hypothetic active surveillance for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are compared in an Australian cohort. METHODS: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma patients were included from a prospectively collected surgical cohort of patients treated for papillary thyroid cancer between 1985 and 2017. The primary outcomes were the complications of thyroid surgery, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and cost of surgical treatment and active surveillance. RESULTS: In a total of 349 patients with papillary microcarcinoma with a median age of 48 years (range, 18-90 years), the permanent operative complications rate was 3.7%. Postoperative radioactive iodine did not decrease recurrence-free survival (P = .3). The total cost of surgical treatment was $10,226 Australian dollars, whereas hypothetic active surveillance was at a yearly cost of $756 Australian dollars. Estimated cost of surgical papillary thyroid microcarcinoma treatment was equivalent to the cost of 16.2 years of active surveillance. CONCLUSION: Surgery may have a long-term economic advantage for younger Australian patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma who are likely to require more than 16.2 years of follow-up in an active surveillance scheme.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Thyroidectomy/economics , Watchful Waiting/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aftercare/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Papillary/economics , Carcinoma, Papillary/mortality , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Positron-Emission Tomography/economics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Gland/surgery , Thyroid Neoplasms/economics , Thyroid Neoplasms/mortality , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Young Adult
20.
Eur Urol Focus ; 6(2): 242-248, 2020 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31031042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may improve prostate cancer risk stratification and decrease the need for repeat biopsies in men on prostate cancer active surveillance (AS). However, the impact of mpMRI on AS-related healthcare spending has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of mpMRI on AS-related Medicare expenditures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare files, we identified men ≥66 yr old with localized prostate cancer diagnosed during 2008-2013. OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: With a validated algorithm, we classified men into AS with and without mpMRI groups. We then determined Medicare spending on AS in each group using inflation-adjusted, price-standardized Medicare payments for AS-related procedures (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] tests, prostate biopsies, biopsy complications, and mpMRI). Multivariable median regression compared Medicare spending on AS for men who received mpMRI and those who did not. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 9081 men on AS with a median follow-up of 45 mo (interquartile range 29-64 mo). Thirteen percent (N = 1225) received mpMRI. On multivariable median regression, receipt of mpMRI was associated with an additional $447 (95% confidence interval $409-487) in Medicare spending per year. We observed greater frequency of AS-related procedures and higher spending for identical procedures (eg, PSA or prostate biopsy) in the mpMRI group than in the non-mpMRI group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries on AS, mpMRI is associated with additional annual Medicare spending. Future studies are needed to determine optimal use of mpMRI during AS to maximize value. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps physicians determine which prostate cancers are aggressive and which can be monitored safely. We studied whether using MRI during prostate cancer monitoring (also called active surveillance) resulted in increased healthcare spending. There was a modest increase in spending, but this may be worthwhile if the use of MRI allows physicians to monitor prostate cancer more accurately.


Subject(s)
Health Expenditures , Medicare , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...