The 5 Ws of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Blood pressure (BP) measurement is affected by multiple variables which influence clinical management decisions and patient outcomes. Around 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) avoids incorrect diagnosis of hypertension (HT), and unnecessary treatment and provides the best prediction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. Clinically important phenotypes of HT such as masked HT (masked HT), white coat HT (white coat HT), and nocturnal HT (nocturnal HT) may be missed by not incorporating ambulatory BP monitoring in practice. However, lack of device availability, operational difficulties, and cost remain barriers to its widespread acceptance in India. In this review, we discuss the when, what, who, why, and where (5Ws) relevant to ABPM measurement.

[Effet blouse blanche résiduel : un outil pertinent en soins premiers?] / Office white-coat effect tail: A useful tool in family practice?

BACKGROUND: White coat effect (WCE) and white coat hypertension (WCH) are hardly both compared in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of repeated measures of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to dissociate various forms of white-coat interactions. METHODS: An open cross-sectional study on consecutive patients treated or not for high blood pressure was made in family physicians' offices. SBP was measured 5 times by an electronic device. Measurements were performed before (SBP1) and after (SBP5) the office visit by a lay assistant and at the beginning (SBP2), middle (SBP3) and end (SBP4) of visit, by the family physician. Home BP (HBPM) was measured from 3 consecutive days by the patient. WCE and office WCE tail (OWCET) were defined, respectively, as a 10 mmHg SBP increase or decrease between SBP2-SBP1 or SBP4-SBP2. WCH was considered when HBPM was normal (SBP < 135 mmHg) at home and high during the SBP2 office visit. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients (134 women versus 71 men, ratio 1.9, aged 59.8±15.7 years) were recruited. In categorical terms, there were 51 patients (25%) who presented with WCE, OWCET was seen in 121 patients (62%) and 47 patients (23%) had WCH. Only 36 patients (18%) presented both OWCET and WCE and 32 (16%) had both OWCET and WCH. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of OWCET in diagnosing WCE or WCH were respectively 0.67 (p<0.0001) and 0.53 (NS). CONCLUSION: Thus, OWCET was predictive of WCE and not of WCH and it is worthwhile to be measured in the family physician office.

Assessing Utility of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring to Distinguish Pediatric Populations Presenting with Elevated Blood Pressure in Rhode Island.

This retrospective study aimed to assess the value of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in distinguishing primary from secondary hypertension in pediatric patients. Our study was conducted on 293 patients referred to a pediatric nephrology clinic over 11 years. Various ABPM parameters were analyzed, including daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, and blood pressure load. Among the participants, 74% were normotensive (white-coat hypertension), 21.5% had primary hypertension, and 4.4% had secondary hypertension. There were no significant differences in the analyzed variables between primary and secondary hypertension groups. Our findings suggest that ABPM might not reliably differentiate between the two in this cohort. As white-coat hypertension becomes more prevalent, ABPM remains a valuable tool in preventing unnecessary workups in children without sustained hypertension. However, our study did not identify specific endpoints for distinguishing primary from secondary hypertension.

Neighborhood Deprivation, Perceived Stress, and Pregnancy-Related Hypertension Phenotypes a Decade Following Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and other adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) increase the risk of developing chronic hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Perceptions of stress and neighborhood context also influence blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. We examined if APOs, higher perceived stress, and neighborhood deprivation were associated with hypertension phenotypes a decade after pregnancy in untreated individuals. METHODS: Participants were 360 individuals who gave birth between 2008 and 2009 and participated in a research study 8-10 years following pregnancy. Standardized office and home BP readings were obtained, and we applied the AHA/ACC 2017 guidelines to identify sustained, white coat, and masked hypertension phenotypes. We measured personal stress with the perceived stress scale and neighborhood deprivation with the CDC Social Vulnerability Index. RESULTS: Of the 38.3% (138/360) with any hypertension, 26.1% (36/138) reported a diagnosis of hypertension but were currently untreated. Sustained hypertension was the most common (17.8%), followed by masked and white coat hypertension, both 10.3%. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy were associated with sustained (odds ratio [OR] 5.54 [95% confidence interval, CI 2.46, 12.46] and white coat phenotypes (OR 4.20 [1.66, 10.60], but not masked hypertension (OR 1.74 [0.62, 4.90]). Giving birth to a small for gestational age infant was also associated with sustained hypertension. In covariate adjusted models, perceived stress, but not neighborhood deprivation, was significantly associated with masked hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: A decade after delivery, APOs were associated with sustained and white coat hypertension, but not masked hypertension. Exploration of the mechanisms underlying, and clinical implications of, these associations is warranted.

Development of preeclampsia in pregnant women with white-coat hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy are a significant cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. White coat hypertension (WCH) is a hypertensive disease characterized by an increased clinic blood pressure but normal home or workplace blood pressure. Due to variable prevalence, a subset of women with WCH may be incorrectly diagnosed with chronic hypertension, highlighting the need for accurate diagnosis. Little is known about the role of WCH in pregnancy, but a meta-analysis aims to determine whether WCH increases the likelihood of developing preeclampsia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether there is an association between WCH and the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant women. The search included PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until February 2023, using PRISMA guidelines. Pregnant women with apparent office hypertension throughout pregnancy who underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring were included. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. RESULTS: This study included 12 studies with a total of 4,672 pregnant women and found that women with WCH have a higher risk of developing preeclampsia compared to normotensive women (RR: 2.29, 95% CI [1.18,4.43], P = 0.01). However, when compared with pregnant women with gestational hypertension or chronic hypertension, women with WCH had a significantly lower risk of developing preeclampsia ((RR: 0.39, [0.20,0.80], p=0.009) and (RR: 0.41, [0.27,0.62], P<0.001), respectively). CONCLUSION: The study recommends incorporating 24-hour ABPM into clinical practice to differentiate between chronic hypertension and WCH in early pregnancy and focus on special management for those who need it. The findings may guide future research on ABPM's role in diagnosing WCH and its effects on pregnancy outcomes.

White-coat hypertension in pregnant women: risk factors, pregnancy outcomes, and biomarkers.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a worldwide health problem for women. They cause complications in up to 10% of pregnancies and are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Traditional blood pressure measurement in clinical practice is the most commonly used procedure for diagnosing and monitoring hypertension treatment, but it is prone to significant inaccuracies caused, on the one hand, by the inherent variability of blood pressure and, on the other, by errors arising from measurement technique and conditions. Some studies have demonstrated a better estimate of the prognosis for the development of cardiovascular diseases using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We can detect white-coat hypertension using this method, which helps to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment in many cases, and we can also detect masked hypertension, which helps to avoid underdiagnosis and a lack of prescribed treatment if needed. White-coat hypertension is not a benign condition - it has been shown to be associated with higher risks of developing preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age babies. In this regard, it is extremely important for clinicians to be aware of the risk factors and outcomes associated with this condition. Pregnant women should be medically monitored both during pregnancy and after delivery to detect target organ damage, cardiovascular risk factors, or a metabolic syndrome.

National Registry of Hypertension Control Evaluated by Office and Home Measurements: The LHAR National Registry. / Registro Nacional do Controle da Hipertensão Arterial Avaliado pela Medida de Consultório e Residencial no Brasil: Registro LHAR.

BACKGROUND: It is known that around 30% of patients have higher blood pressure (BP) values when examined at the office than at home. Worldwide, only 35% of patients with hypertension undergoing treatment have reached their BP targets. OBJECTIVE: To provide epidemiological data on BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists, considering office and home BP measurement. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of patients with a hypertension diagnosis and undergoing antihypertensive treatment, with controlled BP or not. BP was assayed in the office by a medical professional and at home using home BP monitoring (HBPM). The association between categorical variables was verified using the chi-square test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The study included 2540 patients, with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.2 years. Most patients were women (62%; n=1575). Prevalence rates of 15% (n=382) for uncontrolled white coat hypertension and 10% (n=253) for uncontrolled masked hypertension were observed. The rate of BP control in the office was 56.3% and at home, 61%. Meanwhile, 46.4% of the patients had controlled BP in and outside of the office. Greater control was observed in women and in the 49-61 years age group. Considering the new DBHA 2020 threshold for home BP control, the control rate was 42.4%. CONCLUSION: BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists was 56.3%; this rate was 61% when BP was measured at home and 46.4% when considering both the office and home.

FUNDAMENTO: Sabe-se que em torno de 30% dos pacientes apresentam valores de pressão arterial (PA) mais elevados quando examinados no consultório do que em suas residências. No mundo, admite-se que apenas 35% dos hipertensos já tratados tenham alcançado meta pressórica. OBJETIVO: Fornecer dados epidemiológicos sobre o controle da PA nos consultórios, em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros, avaliado pela medida de consultório e monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA). MÉTODOS: Análise transversal. Observou-se pacientes com diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial, em tratamento anti-hipertensivo, podendo ou não estar com a PA controlada. A PA foi verificada no consultório por profissional médico, e no domicílio através da MRPA. A associação entre variáveis categóricas se deu por meio do teste do qui-quadrado (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 2.540 pacientes, com idade média 59,7 ± 15,2 anos. A maioria dos pacientes eram mulheres (62%; n = 1.575). O estudo mostrou uma prevalência de 15% (n = 382) de hipertensão do avental branco não controlada, e 10% (n = 253) de hipertensão mascarada não controlada. A taxa de controle da PA no consultório foi 56,3%, e no domicílio, de 61%; 46,4% dos pacientes tiveram PA controlada no consultório e fora dele. Observou-se maior controle no sexo feminino e na faixa etária 49-61 anos. Observando o controle domiciliar com o novo ponto de corte das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial de 2020, a taxa de controle foi de 42,4%. CONCLUSÃO: O controle pressórico nos consultórios em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros foi de 56,3%; 61% quando a PA foi obtida no domicílio, e 46,4% quando o controle foi observado tanto no consultório como no domicílio.

Comparison of office, home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in hypertensive and suspected hypertensive SWICOS participants.

PURPOSE: Hypertension should be confirmed with the use of home BP measurement (HBPM) or 24h ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM). The aim of our study was to compare measurements obtained by OBPM, HBPM and ABPM in individuals with elevated OBPM participating in the population-based Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study (SWICOS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants with OBPM ≥140/90 mmHg assessed their BP using HBPM and ABPM. The cut-off for hypertension was ≥135/85 mmHg for HBPM, ≥130/80 mmHg for ABPM. White-coat hypertension (WCH) was defined as normal HPBM and ABPM in participants not taking antihypertensive drugs. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as hypertension in HBPM or ABPM despite antihypertensive treatment. RESULTS: Of 72 hypertensive subjects with office BP ≥140/90 mmHg and valid measurements of HBPM and ABPM, 39 were males (aged 62.8 ± 11.8y), 33 were females (aged 57.4 ± 14.2y). Hypertension was confirmed with HBPM and ABPM in 17 participants (24%), with ABPM only in 24 further participants (33%), and with HBPM only in 2 further participants (3%). Participants who had hypertension according to ABPM but not HBPM were younger (59 ± 11 y versus 67 ± 16 y; p < 0.001) and more frequently still working (83% versus 23%; p < 0.001). The prevalence of WCH was 28%. Among the 32 subjects taking antihypertensive drugs, uncontrolled hypertension was found in 49%. CONCLUSION: This population-based study found a high prevalence of WCH and potential uncontrolled hypertension among individuals with elevated OBPM. This study, therefore, supports the ESH recommendations of complementing OBPM by ABPM or HBPM. The use of HBPM instead of ABPM for the confirmation of hypertension in individuals with elevated OBPM might lead to underdiagnosis and uncontrolled hypertension, in particular in the younger working population. In these individuals, this study suggests using ABPM instead of HBPM.

What is already known?Comparing blood pressure measurements in the doctor's office or clinic (OBPM) with out-of-office measurements (either self-measurement at home (HBPM) or ambulatory over 24 hours during both day and night times (ABPM)) improves the accuracy of hypertension diagnosis.Why was the study done?This study was done to provide additional information by comparing HBPM and ABPM in individuals with elevated OPBMs (≥140/≥90mmHg), who participated in the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study (SWICOS)What was found?Our study confirmed differences between office and out-of-office measurements. In 60% of the study participants, ABPM or HBPM confirmed the elevated OBPM but only around half of these participants were treated with antihypertensive drugs. A high proportion of the participants (28%) had white coat hypertension.What does this study add?Our study adds to the literature already available on this issue by reporting on data obtained from a cohort of individuals living in a countryside area of Southern Switzerland.This study also showed that HBPM might underestimate BP in the younger working population.How might this impact on clinical practice?The findings of this population-based study support the European Society of Hypertension recommendations for wider use of out-of-office blood pressure measurement for the confirmation of hypertension in individuals with elevated OBPM to avoid underdiagnosis and uncontrolled hypertension.In the young working population, ABPM should be used instead of only HBPM to confirm hypertension.

Sex Differences in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Levels and Subtypes in a Large Italian Community Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in blood pressure control are recognized. We systematically investigated sex differences in specific components of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), including variability, day-night changes, morning surge, and hypertension types. METHODS: We analyzed ABPs of 52 911 participants (45.6% male, 54.4% female, 37.0% treated for hypertension) visiting 860 Italian community pharmacies. Sex differences in ABP levels and patterns were evaluated in the whole group and 4 risk groups (antihypertensive-treated patients, patients with diabetes, dyslipidemia, or cardiovascular disease). RESULTS: Average 24-hour, day-time, and night-time blood pressure values were consistently higher in males than females (P<0.001). Variability in ABP was higher in females, except during the night. Nondippers and an abnormal morning surge were more common among males (odds ratio and 95% CI, 1.282 [1.230-1.335] and 1.244 [1.159-1.335]; P<0.001). The prevalence of 24-hour and masked hypertension was higher in males (odds ratio and 95% CI, 2.093 [2.019-2.170] and 1.347 [1.283-1.415]; P<0.001) and that of white-coat hypertension in females (0.719 [0.684-0.755]; P<0.001). Ambulatory heart rate mean values were higher (P<0.001) in females. Day-time HR variability was higher and night-time heart rate variability lower in females (P<0.001). Sex differences in ABP levels and patterns detected in the whole population were replicated in all risk groups, except for the prevalence of abnormal morning surge (between sexes difference in antihypertensive-treated participants only). CONCLUSIONS: Females show better ABP control than males, but with an increased blood pressure variability and a greater prevalence of white-coat hypertension. These findings support tailored management of hypertension. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03781401.

Possible cardiovascular risks of white coat hypertension: updated.

White-coat hypertension (WCH) has been defined as an increased blood pressure (BP) in the doctor's office and a normal BP outside the office by 24 hr ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP measurement. It is generated by fear and anxiety of whether an abnormal value could be found and indicate the existence of hypertension. When first described, it was defined as a neuro-defense reaction related to the presence of the doctor in their office or clinic and associated with an increase in heart rate. Initially it was considered a benign condition, not associated with the hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD) and not requiring treatment. However, recent studies have shown that WCH is not a benign condition and is associated with HMOD and cardiovascular (CV) events (CVE). According to recent ACC/AHA guidelines, the outside of office normal BP should be < 130/80 mmHg and according to the ESC/ESH guidelines, the outside of office normal BP should be < 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of WCH varies by different studies from 15% to 40% and up to 50% in older subjects. Currently, the management of WCH if not associated with CV risk factors should be conservative with healthy lifestyle changes and exercise. Drug therapy should be considered if these measures do not work or in the presence of CV risk factors, HMOD, or preexisting cardiovascular disease.

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with stable heart failure. Prevalence and associated factors.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertension is highly common in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited information on its prevalence, circadian variation, and relationship with the various HF phenotypes. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of hypertension and its patterns in HF. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study of patients with optimized stable chronic HF. The patients underwent blood pressure (BP) measurement in the office and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. We estimated the prevalence of hypertension, and its diurnal (controlled, uncontrolled, white coat, and masked) and nocturnal (dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper) patterns. We also analyzed the factors associated with the different patterns and HF phenotypes. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 266 patients were included in the study (mean age, 72±12 years, 67% male, 46% with reduced ejection fraction). Hypertension was present in 83%: controlled in 68%, uncontrolled in 10%, white coat in 10%, and masked in 11%. Among patients with high office BP, 51% had white coat hypertension. Among those with normal office BP, 14% had masked hypertension. The prevalence of dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper patterns was 31%, 43%, and 26%, respectively. Systolic BP was lower in HF with reduced ejection fraction than in HF with preserved ejection fraction (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP monitoring in HF identified white coat hypertension in more than half of patients with high office BP and masked hypertension in a relevant percentage of patients. The distribution of daytime patterns was similar to that of the population without HF in the literature, but most of the study patients had a pathological nocturnal pattern.

Establishment of a scoring model for the differential diagnosis of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish a scoring model for the differential diagnosis of white coat hypertension (WCH) and sustained hypertension (SHT). METHODS: This study comprised 553 adults with elevated office blood pressure, normal renal function, and no antihypertensive medications. Through questionnaire investigation and biochemical detection, 17 parameters, such as gender and age, were acquired. WCH and SHT were distinguished by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The participants were randomly divided into a training set (445 cases) and a validation set (108 cases). The above parameters were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and univariate logistic regression analysis in the training set. Afterward, a scoring model was constructed through multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Finally, six parameters were selected, including isolated systolic hypertension, office systolic blood pressure, office diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, serum creatinine, and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish a scoring model. The R2 and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the scoring model in the training set were 0.163 and 0.705, respectively. In the validation set, the R2 of the scoring model was 0.206, and AUC was 0.718. The calibration test results revealed that the scoring model had good stability in both the training and validation sets (mean square error = 0.001, mean absolute error = 0.014; mean square error = 0.001, mean absolute error = 0.025). CONCLUSION: A stable scoring model for distinguishing WCH was established, which can assist clinicians in identifying WCH at the first diagnosis.

Office blood pressure versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement in childhood obesity.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity-related co-morbidities is rising parallel to the childhood obesity epidemic. High blood pressure (BP), as one of these co-morbidities, is detected nowadays at increasingly younger ages. The diagnosis of elevated BP and hypertension, especially in the childhood population, presents a challenge to clinicians. The added value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in relation to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in obese children is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown how many overweight and obese children have an abnormal ABPM pattern. In this study we evaluated ABPM patterns in a population of overweight and obese children and adolescents, and compared these patterns with regular OBP measurements. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study in overweight or obese children and adolescents aged 4-17 years who were referred to secondary pediatric obesity care in a large general hospital in The Netherlands, OBP was measured during a regular outpatient clinic visit. Additionally, all participants underwent a 24-hour ABPM on a regular week-day. Outcome measures were OBP, mean ambulatory SBP and DBP, BP load (percentage of readings above the ambulatory 95th blood pressure percentiles), ambulatory BP pattern (normal BP, white-coat hypertension, elevated BP, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension), and BP dipping. RESULTS: We included 82 children aged 4-17 years. They had a mean BMI Z-score of 3.3 (standard deviation 0.6). Using ABPM, 54.9% of the children were normotensive (95% confidence interval 44.1-65.2), 26.8% had elevated BP, 9.8% ambulatory hypertension, 3.7% masked hypertension, and 4.9% white-coat hypertension. An isolated night-time BP load > 25% was detected in almost a quarter of the children. 40% of the participants lacked physiologic nocturnal systolic BP dipping. In the group of children with normal OBP, 22.2% turned out to have either elevated BP or masked hypertension on ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a high prevalence of abnormal ABPM patterns in overweight or obese children and adolescents was detected. Additionally, OBP poorly correlated with the child's actual ABPM pattern. Herewith, we emphasized the usefulness of ABPM as an important diagnostic tool in this population.

Health football beats them all: subgroup analysis of the 3F (Fit&Fun with Football) study on white-coat hypertension, sustained hypertension, dippers, nondippers, and on pharmacologically un(treated) arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The 3F study (Fit&Fun with Football) demonstrated a significant reduction in blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, body weight, stress and depression through health football. Health football could be a popular tool to unleash the full preventive potential of physical activity. This work analyses the effect of health football on hypertensive subgroups: dipper, nondipper, white-coat hypertension (WCH), sustained hypertension, (un)treated hypertensive patients (UH, TH). METHODS: A prospective interventional study with 1-year follow-up. Football group (FG): n  = 103, 'health'-football training (1×/week, 90 min) led by licensed football coaches. Physical inactive, hypertensive patients older than 45 years were compared with a control group (CG) ( n  = 105). Subgroups were divided by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), casual blood pressure (CBP), medication schedule and compared by blood pressure (BP), laboratory results and weight. RESULTS: In all three subgroups (WCH vs. sustained hypertension, TH vs. UH, D vs. ND), health football reduced BP and weight significantly compared with the CG, and compared with the admission. An even greater effect in CBP was found in people with WCH than in sustained hypertension (FG: WCH: 141-127 mmHg, sustained Hypertension (SH): 142-132 mmHg; CG: WCH: 141-143 mmHg, SH: 140-141 mmHg). In contrast, the significant reduction in CBP and ABPM was comparable in treated and untreated patients, although antihypertensive drugs were reduced significantly more frequently in FG than in CG. BP reduction in nondippers and dippers was also comparable. In the nondipper group, nocturnal BP was significantly reduced in the FB (122.0-111.5 mmHg), but not in the CG or the dippers. CONCLUSION: All evaluated football subgroups achieved a significant BP reduction (compared with CG). This applied to dipper, nondipper, (un)treated hypertension, WCH and SH. All mentioned subgroups displayed a clear benefit. The even greater reduction in BP in WCH demonstrates the importance of physical activity before the additional prescription of antihypertensive medications, underscoring the recommendations of the ESC and ISH in WCH.

Persistence and determinants of blood pressure phenotypes according to office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in youth.

Ambulatory BP monitoring is increasingly used in children and adolescents, and the persistence of discrepant phenotypes, such as white coat or masked hypertension, is a relevant issue. The objective of this study was to assess the persistence of BP phenotypes over time and the factors related to their persistence. The study included 582 children and adolescents (9.4 ± 2.8 years of age) of both sexes (51% females) referred for routine health maintenance. Anthropometric parameters and office and 24-h ABPM measurements were obtained twice (interval 19.5 ± 6.9 months). BP classification and phenotypes were qualified using the 2016 ESH Guidelines. The correlation coefficient and kappa statistics were used to assess the persistence of phenotypes, and the related factors were evaluated using logistic regression. Based on both systolic and diastolic BP measurements, 91.6%, 16%, 17.2% and 13.7% of the subjects with true normotension, sustained HTN, white coat HTN and masked HTN, respectively, remained in the same category (overall agreement 74.2%, kappa 0.20). The multivariate model predicted the lack of persistence and correctly classified 90.3% of the subjects, with the pathological baseline BP phenotype (mainly masked HTN) being the independent variable that contributed most to the model. Excluding the phenotypes, the rest of the model explained 14% of the lack of persistence, and a high office SBP and high waist circumference were related to the lack of persistence. Furthermore, subjects who experienced an increase in their BMI z score and change in their BMI category were at risk of a lack of persistence. In conclusion, children, especially those with BP phenotypes different from true normotension, should be re-evaluated because a large percentage are likely to become normotensive.

Masked hypertension and neonatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies.

We previously showed that masked hypertension is a frequent finding in high-risk pregnancies and a strong predictor of preeclampsia/eclampsia. However, neonatal consequences of masked hypertension have not been deeply analyzed. Consequently, the aim of this study was to determine if masked hypertension is a risk factor for poor neonatal outcome. We evaluated a cohort of 588 high-risk pregnant women (29 ± 7 years old with 27 ± 6 weeks of gestation at blood pressure evaluation); 22.1%, 8.5%, 2.9%, and 2.6% had history of hypertension, diabetes, collagen diseases and chronic renal disease, respectively. According to the data of office and ambulatory blood pressures monitoring, women was classified as normotension (61.7%), white-coat hypertension (5.4%), masked hypertension (21.6%) and sustained hypertension (11.2%) respectively. Compared to normotension, all neonatal outcomes were worst in women with masked hypertension; neonates had lower mean birth weight (2577 (842) vs. 3079 (688) g, P < 0.001), higher prevalence of very low (12.1% vs 2.0%, P = .002) and extremely low birth weight (4.3% vs 0%, P < 0.001), and low one-minute APGAR score (7.8% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, 14.2% needed admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICE) (P = 0.001). Compared with normotension the risk for poor the combined neonatal outcome (admission to NICE plus still born) was significantly higher in masked hypertension (adjusted OR 2.58 95% CI 1.23-5.40) but not in white-coat hypertension (adjusted OR 0.41 95% CI 0.05-3.12). In conclusion, in high-risk pregnancies, masked hypertension was a strong and independent predictor for poor neonatal outcomes.

Demographics of childhood hypertension in the UK: a report from the Southeast England.

We aimed to describe hypertensive phenotype and demographic characteristics in children and adolescents referred to our paediatric hypertension service. We compared age, ethnicity and BMI in primary hypertension (PH) compared to those with secondary hypertension (SH) and white coat hypertension (WCH). Demographic and anthropometric data were collected for children and adolescents up to age 18 referred to our service for evaluation of suspected hypertension over a 6 year period. Office blood pressure (BP) and out of office BP were performed. Patients were categorised as normotensive (normal office and out of office BP), WCH (abnormal office BP, normal out of office BP), PH (both office and out of office BP abnormal, no underlying cause identified) and SH (both office and out of office BP abnormal, with a secondary cause identified). 548 children and adolescents with mean ± SD age of 10.1 ± 5.8 years and 58.2% girls. Fifty seven percent (n = 314) were hypertensive; of these, 47 (15%), 84 (27%) and 183 (58%) had WCH, PH and SH, respectively. SH presented throughout childhood, whereas PH and WCH peaked in adolescence. Non-White ethnicity was more prevalent within those diagnosed with PH than both the background population and those diagnosed with SH. Higher BMI z-scores were observed in those with PH compared to SH. Hypertensive children <6 years are most likely to have SH and have negligible rates of WCH and PH. PH accounted for 27% of hypertension diagnoses in children and adolescents, with the highest prevalence in adolescence, those of non-White Ethnicity and with excess weight.

Inconsistent Control Status of Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure All Taken Using the Same Device: The HI-JAMP Study Baseline Data.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistencies between the office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) values (described as white-coat hypertension or masked hypertension) may be attributable in part to differences in the BP monitoring devices used. METHODS: We studied consistency in the classification of BP control (well-controlled BP vs. uncontrolled BP) among office, home, and ambulatory BPs by using a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. In the nationwide, general practitioner-based multicenter HI-JAMP study, 2,322 hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs underwent office BP measurements and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), consecutively followed by 5-day home BP monitoring (HBPM), for a total of seven BP measurement days. RESULTS: Using the thresholds of the JSH2019 and ESC2018 guidelines, the patients with consistent classification of well-controlled status in the office (<140 mmHg) and home systolic BP (SBP) (<135 mmHg) (n = 970) also tended to have well-controlled 24-hour SBP (<130 mmHg) (n = 808, 83.3%). The patients with the consistent classification of uncontrolled status in office and home SBP (n = 579) also tended to have uncontrolled 24-hour SBP (n = 444, 80.9%). Among the patients with inconsistent classifications of office and home BP control (n = 803), 46.1% had inconsistent ABPM-vs.-HBPM out-of-office BP control status. When the 2017 ACC/AHA thresholds were applied as an alternative, the results were essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: The combined assessment of the office and home BP is useful in clinical practice. Especially for patients whose office BP classification and home BP classification conflict, the complementary clinical use of both HBPM and ABPM might be recommended.