Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.647
Filter
1.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 103: 102681, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A comparison between Cinematic Rendering Technique (CRT) and Volume Rendering Technique (VRT) in cases with postmortem CT-angiography (PMCTA) was carried out. METHODS: For different injuries seen in PMCTA, a VRT and a CRT image of exactly the same pathological section was generated. Two questionnaires were created, one with CRT and one with VRT reconstructions, with the same questions per 3D-image. The questionnaires were sent to forensic pathologists, lawyers and police officers. In total eleven different injuries had to be analyzed. RESULTS: In total 109 questionnaires were answered fully. Of these returnees, 36 stated that they were forensic pathologists. Seventy-three people were assigned to the group of medical laypersons, in the study this group consists mainly of police officers, judges and lawyers. Between the two software programs CRT and VRT that were compared, no significant difference could be identified in any of the participating groups with regard to the assessment of the life-threatening nature of the injury images shown. When asked about the comprehensibility of pathology, there was a significant difference in favour of CRT. This advantage was apparent to named medical laypersons and to forensic pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a positive trend that CRT may be more understandable than VRT. Not only the medical laypersons, but also the forensic physicians found CRT to be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Forensic Medicine , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Forensic Medicine/methods , Computed Tomography Angiography , Police , Lawyers , Software , Male , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/pathology
2.
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) ; 127(5): 374-380, 2024 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Time is a scarce resource for physicians. One medical task is the request for radiological diagnostics. This process is characterized by high administrative complexity and sometimes considerable time consumption. Measures that lead to an administrative relief in favor of patient care have so far been lacking. AIM OF THE STUDY: Process optimization of the request for radiological diagnostics. As a proof of concept the request for radiological diagnostics was conducted using a mobile, smartphone and tablet-based application with dedicated voice recognition software in the Department of Trauma Surgery at the University Hospital of Würzburg (UKW). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study, time differences and efficiency of the mobile app-based method (ukw.mobile based Application = UMBA) compared to the PC-based method (PC-based application = PCBA) for requesting radiological services were analyzed. The time from the indications to the completed request and the time required to create the request on the device were documented and assessed. Due to the non-normal distribution of the data, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed. RESULTS: The time from the indications to the completed request was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced using UMBA compared to PCBA (PCBA: mean ± standard difference [SD] 19.57 ± 33.24 min, median 3.00 min, interquartile range [IQR] 1.00-30.00 min vs. UMBA: 9.33 ± 13.94 min, median 1.00 min, IQR 0.00-20.00 min). The time to complete the request on the device was also significantly reduced using UMBA (PCBA: mean ± SD 63.77 ± 37.98 s, median 51.96 s, IQR 41.68-68.93 s vs. UMBA: 25.21 ± 11.18 s, median 20.00 s, IQR 17.27-29.00 s). CONCLUSION: The mobile, voice-assisted request process leads to a considerable time reduction in daily clinical routine and illustrates the potential of user-oriented, targeted digitalization in healthcare. In future, the process will be supported by artificial intelligence.


Subject(s)
Mobile Applications , Humans , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Germany , Prospective Studies , Computers, Handheld , Smartphone , Traumatology , Speech Recognition Software , Teleradiology/instrumentation , Teleradiology/methods , Acute Care Surgery
3.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 36(3): 256-265, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411588

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is expanding evidence for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use in pediatric emergency medicine - this review highlights the benefits and challenges in the clinical integration of high-yield POCUS applications. Specifically, it will delve into POCUS applications during resuscitations, controversies of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) in pediatric trauma, POCUS-guided procedures, and examples of clinical pathways where POCUS can expedite definitive care. RECENT FINDINGS: POCUS can enhance diagnostic accuracy and aid in management of pediatric patients in shock and help identify reversible causes during cardiac arrest. The use of the FAST in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma remains nuanced - its proper use requires an integration with clinical findings and an appreciation of its limitations. POCUS has been shown to enhance safety and efficacy of procedures such as nerve blocks, incision & drainage, and intravenous access. Integrating POCUS into pathways for conditions such as intussusception and testicular torsion expedites downstream care. SUMMARY: POCUS enhances diagnostic efficiency and management in pediatric patients arriving at the ED with undifferentiated shock, cardiac arrest, or trauma. Additionally, POCUS improves procedural success and safety, and is integral to clinical pathways for expediting definitive care for various pediatric emergencies. Future research should continue to focus on the impact of POCUS on patient outcomes, ensuring user competency, and the expansion of POCUS into diverse settings.


Subject(s)
Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Point-of-Care Systems , Ultrasonography , Humans , Child , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma/methods , Heart Arrest/diagnostic imaging , Heart Arrest/therapy , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Shock/diagnostic imaging , Shock/therapy , Resuscitation/methods , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Critical Pathways
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 75: 87-89, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A Trauma Team Activation (TTA) is initiated when a patient has sustained a life or limb-threatening injury thereby necessitating resources of a large care team. Previously, a CT scanner was cleared at the time of the prehospital TTA call. Wide variability in the time it took to stabilize patients often led to extended CT scanner idle time. A new policy was developed whereby the team leader would prompt the ED clerk to provide a '5-min heads-up' (5-min HU) notification to the CT scanner personnel as a patient was stabilized. At this point, the CT scanner was cleared. The purpose of this quality improvement project is to evaluate if the new policy saves CT scanner idle time. METHODS: Research interns prospectively followed incoming TTAs in the ED of a large, urban, Level I Trauma Center in November 2022. The interns collected the following time points: TTA notification page, 5-min HU notification, and arrival to CT. Data was analyzed using a non-parametric comparison test (Mann-Whitney U). RESULTS: A convenience sample of 46 TTAs was included. Trauma was blunt (85%; n = 39)) and penetrating (15%; n = 7). The median initial TTA announcement to CT arrival time was 24.0 min (IQR: 9.0 min). Previously, the scanner would have been held for this entire period. The median time from 5-min HU notification to CT arrival was 5.0 min (IQR: 4.0 min). The new policy saved a median of 19 min of CT scanner idle time per patient compared to the old policy (p < 0.0001). The total CT scanner time saved was 818 min (13.6 h). CONCLUSION: These data support the implementation of a 5-min HU policy in the ED for patients arriving as TTAs. This maximizes the availability of CT scanners for other patients in the ED while TTA patients are being stabilized.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Trauma Centers , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Retrospective Studies , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
5.
South Med J ; 116(12): 938-941, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38051166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Follow-up care for incidental findings (IFs) on trauma computed tomography scans is a component of comprehensive healthcare. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of our IF predischarge disclosure practice guideline and identify factors contributing to follow-up failure. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational database: 615 patients with IFs from November 2019 to February 2020. Follow-up compliance was determined by electronic medical record review and/or a telephone call after a mail-out request for voluntary participation. Volunteers answered a predetermined questionnaire regarding follow-up care. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (19%) had computed tomography-based IFs recommending additional imaging or other follow-ups. Seventy-four (64%) patients were lost to inclusion as a result of death (12.1%), inability to contact (51.3%), or noninterest (5.2%). Of the remaining 36 patients, 19 received follow-up care (52.7%) and 17 did not (47.2%). No statistical differences existed among groups in age, sex, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, whether informed by physicians or midlevel providers, or type of IF. A total of 15 (88%) nonfollow-up patients did not recall the disclosure or discharge paperwork instructions. Of 19 compliant patients: 9 had additional imaging only, 5 had biopsies and/or surgical intervention (n = 3 cancer, n = 2 benign), 3 had primary care advice against additional studies and 2 were referred to specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Predischarge disclosure of IFs can contribute significantly to overall patient health. Nonetheless, fewer than half of patients do not pursue follow-up recommendations, most often citing failure to recall verbal/written instructions. More effective communication with attention to health literacy, follow-up telephone calls, and postdischarge appointments are potential catalysts for improved patient compliance.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Incidental Findings , Patient Compliance , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Follow-Up Studies , Patient Discharge , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Disclosure/standards
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901155

ABSTRACT

(1) Abstract: Wound monitoring is an essential aspect in the evaluation of wound healing. This can be carried out with the multidimensional tool HELCOS, which develops a quantitative analysis and graphic representation of wound healing evolution via imaging. It compares the area and tissues present in the wound bed. This instrument is used for chronic wounds in which the healing process is altered. This article describes the potential use of this tool to improve the monitoring and follow-up of wounds and presents a case series of various chronic wounds with diverse etiology treated with an antioxidant dressing. (2) Methods: A secondary analysis of data from a case series of wounds treated with an antioxidant dressing and monitored with the HELCOS tool. (3) Results: The HELCOS tool is useful for measuring changes in the wound area and identifying wound bed tissues. In the six cases described in this article, the tool was able to monitor the healing of the wounds treated with the antioxidant dressing. (4) Conclusions: the monitoring of wound healing with this multidimensional HELCOS tool offers new possibilities to facilitate treatment decisions by healthcare professionals.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Bandages , Digital Technology , Wound Healing , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging
8.
Am Surg ; 89(12): 5626-5630, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Repeat imaging for trauma patients is common in rural health care systems after transfer to a tertiary trauma center which subjects patients to increased radiation, excess costs, and delays to definitive care. A previous retrospective review at our regional trauma center found that pre-transfer CT scans were frequently performed with little change in management. To improve this rate, additional emphasis was placed on (1) best imaging practices during Rural Trauma Team Development Courses (RTTDC), (2) management feedback during regional trauma case reviews, and (3) implementation of practice management guidelines for an inter-provider telehealth system. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive adult trauma patients transferred to a regional trauma center were retrospectively evaluated after trauma system improvements were implemented and compared to the previous cohort in the same system as identified by the regional trauma database. RESULTS: 140 (70%) had a pre-transfer CT scan compared to 152 (77.2%) in the prior study (P = .0112). Additionally, 52 (37.1%) of those with pre-transfer CT scans had at least one repeat scan on arrival which decreased from (55.3%) in the prior study (P < .0001). The most common reason for repeat CT scans was incomplete initial imaging. Those with a repeat scan were more likely to have a head injury (51.9% vs 35.8%, P = .0413). DISCUSSION: With regional trauma system maturation and implementation of internal telemedicine guidelines, there was a statistically significant decrease in both pre-transfer as well as repeat CT scans in a rural trauma system. Additional research exploring patient outcomes and cost savings is recommended.


Subject(s)
Patient Transfer , Wounds and Injuries , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers , Educational Status , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
9.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 105(S2): S22-S27, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950512

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Methoxyflurane is an historical anaesthetic agent that has undergone a renaissance with the introduction of a smaller dose in a handheld 'Penthrox' device. The benefits of Penthrox include its ease of use, with disposable individual packets, and the need for less monitoring and staff, when compared with deeper sedation. The literature acknowledges its use for analgesia and in the management of anterior shoulder dislocation but in no other procedural orthopaedic circumstance. METHODS: Following institutional approval, we undertook a retrospective review of all incidences of Penthrox use to facilitate minor procedures within a 2-month period starting 24 March 2020. Time to procedure and success were recorded using the surrogate markers of patient attendance and x-Ray occurrence times. RESULTS: Some 101 Penthrox doses were given to 89 patients over 97 unique episodes between 24 March and 26 May 2020. No complications were recorded following the use of Penthrox during this period. Patient demographics were explored. Fracture manipulations and casting (n=54) had a 100% success rate in achieving adequate and safe reduction. Joint dislocations (n=34) were treated with varying success. Native elbow dislocations were reduced most successfully (4/4, 100%). Native shoulder dislocations were seen in 17 patients and successful relocation was seen in 11 cases, giving a success rate of 65%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, outside anterior shoulder dislocations, to report on the efficacy of Penthrox within emergent orthopaedic scenarios. We have demonstrated Penthrox to be a safe tool for helping to manage trauma procedures in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Fractures, Bone , Joint Dislocations , Methoxyflurane , Methoxyflurane/administration & dosage , Methoxyflurane/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Pandemics , Anesthetics, Inhalation/therapeutic use , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/drug therapy , Joint Dislocations/diagnostic imaging , Joint Dislocations/drug therapy , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , X-Rays , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , United Kingdom
10.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(2): 315-319, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36418201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma patients undergo fewer computed tomography (CT) scans when evaluated at pediatric trauma centers (PTC) versus adult trauma centers (ATC) with no change in clinical outcome. Factors contributing to this difference are unclear. We sought to identify whether the training background of physicians, specifically emergency medicine (EM) versus pediatric emergency medicine (PEM), affected the CT rate of pediatric trauma patients within one institution. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of CT utilization based on attending physicians' training in trauma patients <18 years between November 2018 and November 2020. Attendings were categorized into two groups: EM residency with no PEM fellowship, or pediatrics/EM residency with PEM fellowship. Primary outcomes measured were the proportion of patients receiving a CT and CT positivity rate. RESULTS: Of 463 study patients, CTs were obtained in 145/228 (64%) patients by EM, and 130/235 (55%) by PEM (p=.07). CT positivity rate was 21% and 19% in EM and PEM, respectively (p=.46). The mean number of CTs per patient in EM was 2.8 compared to 2.1 in PEM (p<.01), and for patients with an injury severity score (ISS) >15, mean number of CTs per patient increased to 4.9 in EM versus 2.4 in PEM (p=.01). CONCLUSIONS: The mean number of CTs ordered per patient was statistically higher for EM attendings. The differences between CT rates highlight future opportunities for ongoing development of pediatric trauma imaging guidelines and radiation exposure reduction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Study, Level III.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries , Child , Humans , Emergency Medicine/education , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/education , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging
11.
Radiología (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 64(6): 566-572, Nov-Dic. 2022. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-211653

ABSTRACT

La elastografía es una novedosa técnica de imagen basada en los ultrasonidos que valora la deformabilidad de los tejidos para ayudar a caracterizar las lesiones. Su uso está muy extendido y ha sido validada en muchos tejidos (hígado, mama, tiroides, etc.). También se aplica en el estudio de la patología musculoesquelética, aunque con limitaciones debido a la variabilidad y heterogeneidad de los tejidos; no obstante, es una técnica muy prometedora. En este artículo trataremos de revisar su utilidad, posibles indicaciones, limitaciones y perspectivas de futuro.(AU)


Elastography is a novel imaging technique based on ultrasound that evaluates the deformability of tissues to help characterize lesions. It is widely used and has been validated in many tissues (e.g., liver, breast, thyroid). It is also used in the study of musculoskeletal disease. Although the use of elastography in musculoskeletal radiology is limited by the variability and heterogeneity of tissues, it is a very promising technique. In this article, we aim to review the usefulness, possible indications, limitations, and future perspectives of this technique in musculoskeletal radiology.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Musculoskeletal System , Ultrasonography , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Imaging , Radiology
12.
Rev. argent. cir ; 114(4): 370-374, oct. 2022. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1422951

ABSTRACT

RESUMEN La uretrografía retrógrada es la técnica de referencia (gold standard) utilizada clásicamente para hacer diagnóstico de lesiones de uretra. En este contexto se presenta un caso en el que se realizó tomografía computarizada con reconstrucción 3D con contraste intravenoso y endouretral, pudiendo reconstruir la uretra en toda su extensión en forma tridimensional. De esta manera se arribó al diagnóstico de certeza de la lesión de uretra. Como ventaja del método se menciona la posibilidad de diagnosticar ‒ con un solo estudio por imágenes‒ lesiones de todo el tracto urinario, órganos sólidos, huecos y lesión del anillo pélvico asociados al traumatismo, con una alta sensibilidad y especificidad sin necesidad de requerir otros estudios complementarios.


ABSTRACT Retrograde urethrography is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of urethral injuries. In this setting, we report the use of computed tomography with intravenous injection and urethral administration of contrast medium and 3D reconstruction of the entire urethra. The definitive diagnosis of urethral injury was made. The advantage of this method is the possibility of making the diagnosis of traumatic injuries of the entire urinary tract, solid organs, hollow viscera and of the pelvic ring within a single imaging test, with high sensitivity and specificity, with no need to perform other complementary tests.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Urethra/injuries , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Urethra/surgery , Cystostomy , Accidents, Traffic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
13.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 16065, 2022 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36168030

ABSTRACT

The trauma center of the University Hospital Wuerzburg has developed an advanced trauma pathway based on a dual-room trauma suite with an integrated movable sliding gantry CT-system. This enables simultaneous CT-diagnostics and treatment of two trauma patients. The focus of this study was to investigate the quality of the concept based on defined outcome criteria in this specific setting (time from arrival to initiation of CT scan: tCT; time from arrival to initiation of emergency surgery: tES). We analyzed all trauma patients admitted to the hospital's trauma suite from 1st May 2019 through 29th April 2020. Two subgroups were defined: trauma patients, who were treated without a second trauma patient present (group 1) and patients, who were treated simultaneously with another trauma patient (group 2). Simultaneous treatment was defined as parallel arrival within a period of 20 min. Of 423 included trauma patients, 46 patients (10.9%) were treated simultaneously. Car accidents were the predominant trauma mechanism in this group (19.6% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.05). Prehospital life-saving procedures were performed with comparable frequency in both groups (intubation 43.5% vs. 39%, p = 0.572); pleural drainage 3.2% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.708; cardiopulmonary resuscitation 5% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.387). At hospital admission, patients in group 2 suffered significantly more pain (E-problem according to Advanced Trauma Life Support principles©; 29.2% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the clinical treatment (emergency procedures, vasopressor and coagulant therapy, and transfusion of red blood cells). tCT was 6 (4-10) minutes (median and IQR) in group 1 and 8 (5-15.5) minutes in group 2 (p = 0.280). tES was 90 (78-106) minutes in group 1 and 99 (97-108) minutes in group 2 (p = 0.081). The simultaneous treatment of two trauma patients in a dual-room trauma suite with an integrated movable sliding gantry CT-system requires a medical, organizational, and technical concept adapted to this special setting. Despite the oftentimes serious and life-threatening injuries, optimal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can be guaranteed for two simultaneous trauma patients at an individual medical level in consistent quality.


Subject(s)
Coagulants , Wounds and Injuries , Blood Transfusion , Humans , Resuscitation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
14.
Injury ; 53(9): 2907-2914, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35688707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement activities in trauma systems are widely based on comparisons between trauma centers within the same system. Comparisons across different trauma systems may reveal further opportunities for quality improvement. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the integrated trauma systems in Québec, Canada and in Victoria, Australia, regarding their structures, care processes and patient outcomes. METHODOLOGY: The elements recommended by the American College of Surgeons were used to compare trauma systems structures. Comparisons of care processes and patient outcomes were based on data from major trauma admissions extracted from trauma registries (2013 and 2017). Care processes included time to reach a definitive care facility, time spent in the emergency department, and time lapsed before the first head computed tomography (CT) scan. These care processes were compared using a z-test of log-transformed times. Hospital mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared using indirect standardization based on multiple logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: Major differences in trauma system structure were Advanced Trauma Life Support at the scene of injury (Victoria), the use of validated prehospital triage tools (Québec), and mandatory accreditation of all trauma centers (Québec). Patients in Québec arrived at their definitive care hospital earlier than their counterparts in Victoria (median: 1.93 vs. 2.13 h, p = 0.002), but spent longer in the emergency department (median: 8.23 vs. 5.15 h, p<0.0001) and waited longer before having their first head CT (median: 1.90 vs. 1.52 h, p<0.0001). In-hospital mortality and hospital LOS were higher in Québec than in Victoria (standardized mortality ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09 - 1.20; standardized LOS ratio: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09 - 1.11). CONCLUSION: We observed important differences in the structural components and care processes in Québec and Victoria's trauma systems, which might explain some of the observed differences in patient outcomes. This study shows the potential value of international comparisons in trauma care and identifies possible opportunities for quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay , Quebec/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Victoria/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
15.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(5): 903-914, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678950

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: While interventional radiologists occupy a critical role in adult trauma management, the role of interventionalist in pediatric trauma continues to evolve. The indications for transarterial embolization (TAE) are significantly different in pediatric patients in whom non-operative management (NOM) has a much more prominent role than in adults. Contrast extravasation on imaging may not require acute surgical or interventional management as it would in an adult. There are also areas in which pediatric interventional radiology is increasingly useful such as pelvic TAE in failed management, or splenic embolization to treat bleeding without the loss of splenic function inherent to surgical splenectomy. The rapid evolution of techniques and devices in pediatric patients is also changing what interventions are possible in pediatric trauma management which necessitates frequent reassessment of the guidelines and interventional radiology's role in caring for these patients. CONCLUSION: This review seeks to consolidate the recent literature to describe the evolving role of the interventional radiologist in pediatric trauma management.


Subject(s)
Professional Role , Radiologists , Wounds and Injuries , Child , Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Humans , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Spleen/injuries , Spleen/surgery , Splenectomy , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
16.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(6): 4615-4622, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546201

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hospitals involved in the care of severely injured patients treat a varying number of such cases per year. Large hospitals were expected to show a better performance regarding process times in the emergency room. The present investigation analyzed whether this assumption was true, based on a large national trauma registry. METHODS: A total of 129,193 severely injured patients admitted primarily to one of 675 German hospitals and documented in the TraumaRegister DGU® were considered for this analysis. The analysis covered a 5 years time period (2013-2017). Hospitals were grouped by their average number of annually treated severe trauma patients into five categories ranging from 'less than 10 patients' to '100 or more'. The following process times were compared: pre-hospital time; time from admission to diagnostic procedures (sonography, X-ray, computed tomography), time from admission to selected emergency interventions and time in the emergency room. RESULTS: Seventy-eight high volume hospitals treated 45% of all patients, while 30% of hospitals treated less than ten cases per year. Injury severity and mortality increased with volume per year. Whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) was used less frequently in small hospitals (53%) as compared to the large ones (83%). The average time to WB-CT fell from 28 min. in small hospitals to 19 min. in high volume hospitals. There was a linear trend to shorter performance times for all diagnostic procedures (sonography, X-ray, WB-CT) when the annual volume increased. A similar trend was observed for time to blood transfusion (58 min versus 44 min). The median time in the emergency room fell from 74 min to 53 min, but there was no clear trend for the time to the first emergency surgery. Due to longer travel times, prehospital time was about 10 min higher in patients admitted to high volume hospitals compared to patients admitted to smaller local hospitals. CONCLUSION: Process times in the emergency room decreased consistently with an increase of patient volume per year. This decrease, however, was associated with a longer prehospital time.


Subject(s)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Registries , Emergency Service, Hospital , Germany/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
18.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(4): 503-512, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35137729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older trauma patients are reported to receive lower levels of care than younger adults. Differences in clinical management between adult and older trauma patients hold important information about potential trauma system improvement targets. The aim of this study was to compare prehospital and early in-hospital management of adult and older trauma patients, focusing on time-critical interventions and radiological examinations. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Norwegian Trauma Registry for 2015 through 2018. Trauma patients 16 years or older met by a trauma team and with New Injury Severity Score of 9 or greater were included, dichotomized into age groups 16 years to 64 years and 65 years or older. Prehospital and emergency department clinical management, advanced airway management, chest decompression, and admission radiological examinations was compared between groups applying descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There were 9543 patients included, of which 28% (n = 2711) were 65 years or older. Older patients, irrespective of injury severity, were less likely attended by a prehospital doctor/paramedic team (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.71), conveyed by air ambulance (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.73), and transported directly to a trauma center (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). Time-critical intervention and primary survey radiological examination rates only differed between age groups among patients with New Injury Severity Score of 25 or greater, showing lower rates for older adults (advanced airway management: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47-0.76; chest decompression: OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; x-ray chest: OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; x-ray pelvis: OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.84). However, for the patients attended by a doctor/paramedic team, there were no management differences between age groups. CONCLUSION: Older trauma patients were less likely to receive advanced prehospital care compared with younger adults. Older patients with very severe injuries received fewer time-critical interventions and radiological examinations. Improved dispatch of doctor/paramedic teams to older adults and assessment of the impact the observed differences have on outcome are future research priorities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , Emergency Medical Services , Wounds and Injuries , Adolescent , Aged , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
19.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(2): 227-234, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34988751

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The use of lung ultrasound for diagnosis of COVID-19 has emerged during the pandemic as a beneficial diagnostic modality due to its rapid availability, bedside use, and lack of radiation. This study aimed to determine if routine ultrasound (US) imaging of the lungs of trauma patients with COVID-19 infections who undergo extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) correlates with computed tomography (CT) imaging and X-ray findings, as previously reported in other populations. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational feasibility study performed at two level 1 trauma centers. US, CT, and X-ray imaging were retrospectively reviewed by a surgical trainee and a board-certified radiologist to determine any correlation of imaging findings in patients with active COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: There were 53 patients with lung US images from EFAST available for evaluation and COVID-19 testing. The overall COVID-19 positivity rate was 7.5%. COVID-19 infection was accurately identified by one patient on US by the trainee, but there was a 15.1% false-positive rate for infection based on the radiologist examination. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the lung during EFAST cannot be used in the trauma setting to identify patients with active COVID-19 infection or to stratify patients as high or low risk of infection. This is likely due to differences in lung imaging technique and the presence of concomitant thoracic injury.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma , Lung Diseases , Lung , Wounds and Injuries , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/epidemiology , False Positive Reactions , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases/etiology , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Centers , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging
20.
Clin Radiol ; 77(3): 231-235, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35022132

ABSTRACT

AIM: To follow-up previous work evaluating incidental findings of COVID-19 signs on computed tomography (CT) images of major trauma patients to include the second wave prior to any major effects from vaccines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included all patients admitted following major trauma between 1 January 2020 and 28 February 2021 with CT including the lungs (n=1776). Major trauma patients admitted pre-COVID-19 from alternate months from January 2019 to November 2019 comprised a control group (n=837). The assessing radiologists were blinded to the time period and used double reading in consensus to determine if the patient had signs of COVID-19. Lung appearances were classified as no evidence of COVID-19, minor signs, or major signs. RESULTS: The method successfully tracked the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in London. The estimated population affected by the disease based on those with major signs was similar to estimates of the proportion of the population in London with antibodies (around 30% by end February 2021) and the total of major and minor signs produced a much higher figure of 68%, which may include all those with both antibody and just T-cell responses. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings on CT from major trauma patients may provide a novel and sensitive way of tracking the virus. It is recommended that all major trauma units include a simple question on signs of COVID-19 to provide an early warning system for further waves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , London/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prevalence , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...