Diagnosis and treatment challenges in lower resource countries: State-of-the-art.

The 2022 World Federation of Haemophilia Annual Global Survey (AGS) reports that 454,690 patients with inherited bleeding disorders (IBD) have been identified globally. While this represents noteworthy progress, haemophilia epidemiology data indicate that 75% of people with inherited bleeding disorders living in low-income and low-to-middle-income countries have yet to be diagnosed. The AGS also revealed that 11 billion clotting factor units are available to treat haemophilia A and B globally. Due to a lack of finance, these treatments are unavailable to haemophilia in low-income countries with a consequence lack of access equity for haemophilia treatment in these communities. This sobering reality is not limited to haemophilia but applies to von Willebrand Disease (VWD). While VWD is the most prevalent IBD, only 103,844 people living with this condition have been diagnosed globally. Of the diagnosed patients, only a fraction live in low- or middle-income countries. Moreover, the majority of VWD patients are still treated sub-optimally without replacement therapies or prophylaxis, both of which are now accepted as global standards of care. In this state-of-the-art review, the authors reflect on three issues. First, the minimum elements required to diagnose haemophilia in a resource-constrained setting are identified. Second, this review points to the critical stakeholders and outlines their roles in removing access to haemophilia treatment barriers. Finally, the authors examine von Willebrand disease's ongoing diagnostic and treatment challenges and compare these to haemophilia. With the rapidly evolving novel therapies, the therapeutic landscape of all IBD will likely change for the better.

Diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease in 2024 and beyond.

MANUSCRIPT BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis and clinical care of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) has continued to evolve since the characterization of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene in 1985. This condition is almost certainly the most common inherited bleeding disorder, and the major symptomatic burden of the disease is experienced by females during their reproductive years. Diagnosis relies on the identification of a personal and family history of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding, and laboratory features consistent with quantitative and/or qualitative abnormalities of VWF. This review focuses on three aspects of VWD management, with current updates and a look into the future. MANUSCRIPT THEMES: First, we will address the role of genetics in the diagnosis and possible therapies for VWD. With current technologies, VWD genetic diagnosis is usually confined to the confirmation of type 2 subtypes of the disease and type 3 VWD analysis for family planning. While type 3 VWD is a potential candidate for the application of gene therapy, no treatments are currently close to entering the clinic. Second, the peri-procedural management of patients with VWD remains an important element of care. The choice of product, its dose and schedule all require careful consideration depending upon the type and disruptive nature of the planned procedure. Lastly, in addition to gene therapy, several other novel therapeutic interventions are also being developed for bleeding and prophylaxis in VWD. These include a VWF aptamer interfering with VWF clearance and bioengineered forms of VWF.

Type 2M/2A von Willebrand disease: a shared phenotype between type 2M and 2A.

ABSTRACT: Four variants have been continuously subjected to debate and received different von Willebrand disease (VWD) classifications: p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. We chose to comprehensively investigate these variants with full set of VWD tests, protein-modeling predictions and applying structural biology. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1315C, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C were included. A group with type 2A and 2M was included to better understand similarities and differences. Patients were investigated for phenotypic assays and underlying disease mechanisms. We applied deep protein modeling predictions and structural biology to elucidate the causative effects of variants. Forty-three patients with these variants and 70 with 2A (n = 35) or 2M (n = 35) were studied. Patients with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, or p.R1374C showed a common phenotype between 2M and 2A using von Willebrand factor (VWF):GPIbR/VWF:Ag and VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios and VWF multimeric profile, whereas p.R1315C represented a type 2M phenotype. There was an overall reduced VWF synthesis or secretion in 2M and cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C, but not in 2A. Reduced VWF survival was observed in most 2A (77%), 2M (80%), and all 40 cases with p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C. These were the only variants that fall at the interface between the A1-A2 domains. p.R1315L/C mutants induce more compactness and internal mobility, whereas p.R1374H/C display a more extended overall geometry. We propose a new classification of type 2M/2A for p.R1315L, p.R1374H, and p.R1374C because they share a common phenotype with 2M and 2A. Our structural analysis shows the unique location of these variants on the A1-A2 domains and their distinctive effect on VWF.

A Compound Heterozygosis of Two Novel Mutations in vWF Exacerbates vWD in a Chinese Pedigree.

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand disease (vWD), caused by mutations in the von Willebrand factor (vWF) coding gene, is a disease characterized by abnormal coagulation activity and a severe tendency for hemorrhage. Therefore, identifying mutations in vWF is important for diagnosing congenital vWD. METHODS: We studied a 23-year-old male vWD patient and his parents. Clotting methods were used to determine activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen (FIB) levels, FVIII activity. Chromogenic substrate method was used to determine vWF antigen and activity. The platelet count was determined. Mutations were searched using whole-exome sequencing and certified by Sanger sequencing. Clinical data, including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen levels, FX activity, FX antigen levels, and the platelet count were collected. A mixing study was performed to eliminate the presence of coagulation factor inhibitors and lupus anticoagulants. Mutations were screened by using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and were verified by using Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The proband showed severely decreased vWF antigen, vWF activity, and FVIII activity. RIPA (RISTO-CETIN-induced platelet aggregation) was 0%. Data from WES showed that the proband carried compound heterozygous variants vWF: NM_000552.5 (c.3213C>A p.Cys1071Ter) and vWF: NM_000552.5 (c.6598+2T>C). The proband's mother carried variant vWF: NM_000552.5 (c.3213C>A p.Cys1071Ter) while the proband's father carried variant vWF: NM_000552.5 (c.6598+2T>C). All laboratory test indexes of the proband's parents, including vWF antigen, vWF activity, and FVIII activity, were within the normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a compound heterozygosis with two novel mutations in vWF (c.3213C>A, c.6598+2T >C) in a family pedigree, and our results demonstrate that the compound heterozygous mutations probably exacerbate vWD.

von Willebrand disease: A guide for the internist.

von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder, results when patients either do not make enough von Willebrand factor (VWF) or make defective VWF. The pathophysiology of this disorder is complex but needs to be understood to interpret the diagnostic tests. Most patients have mild to moderate symptoms and can be adequately counseled and managed by a general internist, but some need to consult a hematologist. We review the pathophysiology of VWD, its subtypes, common presentations of each subtype, diagnostic testing, and management of mild as well as severe clinical manifestations of VWD.

Acquired von Willebrand's Syndrome in a Patient with Concomitant Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma.

An African-American female in her sixties presented to the hospital with intermittent gum bleeding for the past two years along with severe anemia. This case details the differential and workup that lead to the diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand's syndrome (AvWS). A thorough investigation in the possible etiologies of AvWS revealed that the patient had concomitant chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Due to the concomitant diagnosis of CLL and SMM, there was a dilemma regarding whether CLL, SMM, or both was driving this patient's AvWS. Decision was made to treat the underlying CLL initially with rituximab and later on at recurrence with obinutuzumab/venetoclax with complete resolution of patient's bleeding and normalization of her factor VIII activity, von Willebrand factor antigen levels, and vWF:ristocetin cofactor levels. We believe this is first case in the literature of a patient with AvWS with concurrent CLL and SMM.

The Role of the von Willebrand Factor Collagen-Binding Assay (VWF:CB) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and Way Beyond: A Comprehensive 36-Year History.

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay was first reported for use in von Willebrand diagnostics in 1986, by Brown and Bosak. Since then, the VWF:CB has continued to be used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease (VWD) (correctly) and also to help assign the correct subtype, as well as to assist in the monitoring of VWD therapy, especially desmopressin (DDAVP). However, it is important to recognize that the specific value of any VWF:CB is predicated on the use of an optimized VWF:CB, and that not all VWF:CB assays are so optimized. There are some good commercial assays available, but there are also some "not-so-good" commercial assays available, and these may continue to give the VWF:CB "a bad reputation." In addition to VWD diagnosis and management, the VWF:CB found purpose in a variety of other applications, from assessing ADAMTS13 activity, to investigation into acquired von Willebrand syndrome (especially as associated with use of mechanical circulatory support or cardiac assist devices), to assessment of VWF activity in disease states in where an excess of high-molecular-weight VWF may accumulate, and lead to increased (micro)thrombosis risk (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). The VWF:CB turns 37 in 2023. This review is a celebration of the utility of the VWF:CB over this nearly 40-year history.

Clinical relevance of genetic variants in the von Willebrand factor according to in-silico methods.

Clinical interpretation of genetic variants in the context of the patient's phenotype is a time-consuming and costly process. In-silico analysis using in-silico prediction tools, and molecular modeling have been developed to predict the influence of genetic variants on the quality and/or quantity of the resulting translated protein, and in this way, to alert clinicians of disease likelihood in the absence of previous evidence. Our objectives were to evaluate the success rate of the in-silico analysis in predicting the disease-causing variants as pathogenic and the single-nucleotide variants as neutral, and to establish the reliability of in-silico analysis for determining pathogenicity or neutrality of von Willebrand factor gene-associated genetic variants. Using in-silico analysis, we studied pathogenicity in 31 disease-causing variants, and neutrality in 61 single-nucleotide variants from patients previously diagnosed as type 2 von Willebrand disease. Disease-causing variants and non-synonymous single-nucleotide variants were explored by in-silico tools that analyze the amino acidic sequence. Intronic and synonymous single-nucleotide variants were analyzed by in-silico methods that evaluate the nucleotidic sequence. We found a consistent agreement between predictions achieved by in-silico prediction tools and molecular modeling, both for defining the pathogenicity of disease-causing variants and the neutrality of single-nucleotide variants. Based on our results, the in-silico analysis would help to define the pathogenicity or neutrality in novel genetic variants observed in patients with clinical and laboratory phenotypes suggestive of von Willebrand disease.

The common VWF variant p.Y1584C: detailed pathogenic examination of an enigmatic sequence change.

BACKGROUND: As knowledge of the human genome has advanced, so too has the recognition that interpretation of the pathogenic nature of sequence variants can be challenging. The von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene exhibits a significant degree of sequence variability, and the first VWF variant associated with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), c.4751 A>G, p.Y1584C, was described in 2003. However, since that time, the pathogenic nature of this variant has remained unclear, being assigned properties ranging from a risk factor to a pathogenic variant. OBJECTIVES: To provide additional evaluation on the interpretation of pathogenicity for this common VWF variant. METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects with only the p.Y1584C variant were recruited from 2 cohort studies (the Zimmerman Program and the Canadian type 1 VWD study). Clinical and laboratory phenotypes were assessed. RESULTS: The prevalence of the p.Y1584C variant in our cohorts was 23- to 27-fold higher than that in large normal population databases. Significantly more p.Y1584C subjects had an abnormal bleeding score when compared to Y1584 individuals. In comparison with a group of 35 subjects without the p.Y1584C variant, subjects with the variant had lower mean VWF:antigen and VWF:ristocetin cofactor values and significantly higher VWF propeptide/VWF:antigen ratios suggestive of enhanced clearance. CONCLUSION: Collectively, the results of this analysis suggest that p.Y1584C is likely pathogenic, however, due to influences such as incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and other genetic modifiers like ABO blood group, the straightforward assignment of pathogenicity to this variant is inevitably challenging.

Key Drivers of Coagulation Factor Use in Von Willebrand Disease During Hospitalization: An Overview of the French BERHLINGO Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. However, studies of hospitalisation patterns with replacement treatment are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the current therapeutic management of VWD and determine the key drivers of coagulation factor uses in patients during hospitalisation. METHODS: Hopscotch-WILL was a multi-centric retrospective study conducted over a 48-month period in any patients with VWD. The data were collected from the BERHLINGO Research Database and the French Hospital database. RESULTS: A total of 988 patients were included; 153 patients (15%) were hospitalised during 293 stays requiring treatment with von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates-pure or in association with Factor VIII (FVIII). Their median basal concentrations of VWF and FVIII were significantly lower than in untreated patients: VWF antigen < 30 IU/dL, VWF activity < 20 IU/dL and FVIII:C < 40 IU/dL. The median (interquartile range) concentrate consumption was similar between highly purified VWF or VWF combined with FVIII (72 [110] vs 57 [89] IU/kg/stay, p = 0.154). The use of VWF was highly heterogeneous by VWD type; type 3 had a particularly high impact on VWF consumption in non-surgical situations. The main admissions were for ear/nose/throat, hepato-gastroenterology, and trauma/orthopaedic conditions, besides gynaecological-obstetric causes in women. CONCLUSIONS: The use of VWF concentrates is mostly influenced by low basal levels of VWF and FVIII, but also by VWD type or the cause for hospitalisation. These results could inform future studies of newly released recombinant VWF.

Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) multiplex activity assay differentiation of type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and variant VWD.

INTRODUCTION: VWD diagnosis is challenging requiring multiple VWF activity tests using many individual assays. We have developed an ELISA-based VWF Multiplex Activity Assay (VWF-MAA) to address this concern; however, the ability of the VWF-MAA to discriminate between type 1 VWD, variant VWD, and normal subjects has not been evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the VWF-MAA and its ability to differentiate between type 1 VWD, variant VWD and normal subjects in individuals undergoing an initial laboratory evaluation for bleeding. METHODS: A total of 177 plasma samples from the Zimmerman Program: Comparative Effectiveness in the Diagnosis of VWD were evaluated from 11 centres across the US and Canada. The VWF-MAA was compared to Versiti Blood Research Institute (VBRI) and Local Center (LC) assigned VWD diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 129/177 (72.9%) were correctly assigned as normal (non-VWD), type 1, or variant VWD compared to the VBRI assigned diagnosis. VWF-MAA assigned non-VWD accurately in 29/57 (50.9%) samples, and type 1 VWD accurately in 93/110 (84.6%) samples. Considering LC diagnosis where there was agreement with VWF-MAA and not VBRI diagnosis, type 1 VWD was accurate in 105/110 (95.5%) samples. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good correlation between laboratory methods. VWD, types 2A, 2B, 1C VWD were also assigned by the VWF-MAA. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that the VWF-MAA has utility in differentiating type 1 VWD, variant VWD and normal subjects in individuals undergoing an initial laboratory evaluation for bleeding.

Type 1 VWD classification revisited: novel insights from combined analysis of the LoVIC and WiN studies.

ABSTRACT: There is significant ongoing debate regarding type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) defintion. Previous guidelines recommended patients with von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels <30 IU/dL be diagnosed type 1 VWD, whereas patients with significant bleeding and VWF levels from 30 to 50 IU/dL be diagnosed with low VWF. To elucidate the relationship between type 1 VWD and low VWF in the context of age-induced increases in VWF levels, we combined data sets from 2 national cohort studies: 162 patients with low VWF from the Low VWF in Ireland Cohort (LoVIC) and 403 patients with type 1 VWD from the Willebrand in The Netherlands (WiN) studies. In 47% of type 1 VWD participants, VWF levels remained <30 IU/dL despite increasing age. Conversely, VWF levels increased to the low VWF range (30-50 IU/dL) in 30% and normalized (>50 IU/dL) in 23% of type 1 VWD cases. Crucially, absolute VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) levels and increase of VWF:Ag per year overlapped between low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD participants. Moreover, multiple regression analysis demonstrated that VWF:Ag levels in low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD patients would not have been different had they been diagnosed at the same age (ß = 0.00; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.04). Consistently, no difference was found in the prevalence of VWF sequence variants; factor VIII activity/VWF:Ag or VWF propeptide/VWF:Ag ratios; or desmopressin responses between low VWF and normalized type 1 VWD patients. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that low VWF does not constitute a discrete clinical or pathological entity. Rather, it is part of an age-dependent type 1 VWD evolving phenotype. Collectively, these data have important implications for future VWD classification criteria.

Evaluation of a diagnostic platelet aggregation test strategy for platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts.

INTRODUCTION: Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is important for diagnosing platelet function disorders (PFD) and von Willebrand disease (VWD) affecting ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA). Nonetheless, data is lacking on the utility of LTA for investigating thrombocytopenic patients and platelet rich plasma samples with low platelet counts (L-PRP). Previously, we developed a strategy for diagnostic LTA assessment of L-PRP that included: (1) acceptance of referrals/samples, regardless of thrombocytopenia severity, (2) tailored agonist selection, based on which are informative for L-PRP with mildly or severely low platelet counts, and (3) interpretation of maximal aggregation (MA) using regression-derived 95% confidence intervals, determined for diluted control L-PRP (C-L-PRP). METHODS: To further evaluate the L-PRP LTA strategy, we evaluated findings for a subsequent patient cohort. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2021, the L-PRP strategy was applied to 211 samples (11.7% of all LTA samples) from 192 unique patients, whose platelet counts (median [range] × 109 /L) for blood and L-PRP were: 105 [13-282; 89% with thrombocytopenia] and 164 [17-249], respectively. Patient-L-PRP had more abnormal MA findings than simultaneously tested C-L-PRP (p-values <0.001). Among patients with accessible electronic medical records (n = 181), L-PRP LTA uncovered significant aggregation abnormalities in 45 (24.9%), including 18/30 (60%) with <80 × 109 platelets/L L-PRP, and ruled out PFD, and VWD affecting RIPA, in others. The L-PRP LTA strategy helped diagnose VWD affecting RIPA, Bernard Soulier syndrome, familial platelet disorder with myeloid malignancy, suspected ITGA2B/ITGB3-related thrombocytopenia, and acquired PFD. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic LTA with L-PRP, using a strategy that considers thrombocytopenia severity, is feasible and informative.

Patient-specific severity of von Willebrand factor degradation identifies patients with a left ventricular assist device at high risk for bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) cause an acquired von Willebrand factor (VWF) deficiency and bleeding. Models to risk-stratify for bleeding are urgently needed. We developed a model of continuous-flow LVAD bleeding risk from patient-specific severity of VWF degradation. METHODS: In a prospective, longitudinal cohort study, paired blood samples were obtained from patients (n = 67) with a continuous-flow LVAD before and during support. After 640 ± 395 days, patients were categorized as all-cause bleeders, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeders, or nonbleeders. VWF multimers and VWF clotting function were evaluated to determine bleeding risk. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 34 (51%) experienced bleeding, 26 (39%) experienced GI bleeding, and 33 (49%) did not bleed. In all patients, LVAD support significantly reduced high-molecular-weight VWF multimers (P < .001). Bleeders exhibited greater loss of high-molecular-weight VWF multimers (mean ± standard deviation, -10 ± 5% vs -7 ± 4%, P = .008) and reduced VWF clotting function versus nonbleeders (median [interquartile range], -12% [-31% to 4%] vs 0% [-9 to 26%], P = .01). A combined metric of VWF multimers and VWF function generated the All-Cause Bleeding Risk Score, which stratified bleeders versus nonbleeders (86 ± 56% vs 41 ± 48%, P < .001) with a positive predictive value of 86% (95% confidence interval, 66%-95%) and diagnostic odds ratio of 11 (95% confidence interval, 2.9-44). A separate GI Bleeding Risk Score stratified GI bleeders versus nonbleeders (202 ± 114 vs 120 ± 86, P = .003) with a positive predictive value of 88% (64%-97%) and diagnostic odds ratio of 18 (3.1-140). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of loss of VWF multimers and VWF clotting function generated Bleeding Risk Scores with high predictive value for LVAD-associated bleeding. This model may guide personalized antithrombotic therapy and patient surveillance.

Management of pregnant women who have bleeding disorders.

Bleeding disorders, including von Willebrand disease (VWD), hemophilia, other coagulation factor deficiencies, platelet disorders, defects of fibrinolysis, and connective tissue disorders, have both maternal and fetal implications. Successful management of bleeding disorders in pregnant women requires not only an understanding of bleeding disorders but also an understanding of when and how bleeding occurs in pregnancy. Bleeding does not occur during a normal pregnancy with a healthy placenta. Bleeding occurs during pregnancy when there is an interruption of the normal utero-placental interface, during miscarriage, during an ectopic pregnancy, or at the time of placental separation at the conclusion of pregnancy. Although mild platelet defects may be more prevalent, the most commonly diagnosed bleeding disorder among women is VWD. Other bleeding disorders are less common, but hemophilia carriers are unique in that they are at risk of bleeding themselves and of giving birth to an affected male infant. General guidance for maternal management of a woman who is moderately or severely affected includes obtaining coagulation factor levels at a minimum in the third trimester; planning for delivery at a center with hemostasis expertise; and anticipating the need for hemostatic agents. General guidance for fetal management includes pre-pregnancy counseling; the option of preimplantation genetic testing for hemophilia; delivery at a tertiary care center with pediatric hematology and newborn intensive care; consideration of cesarean delivery of a potentially severely affected infant; and avoidance of invasive procedures such as scalp electrodes and operative vaginal delivery in any potentially affected infant.

Surprise diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in a patient previously thought to have type III von Willebrand disease: evaluation and periprocedural management.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare disorder that is characterised by an acquired deficiency of von Willebrand factor. AVWS was suspected in a patient with type III von Willebrand disease (VWD) who did not respond to factor replacement therapy. Given the crucial implications for management, we describe this patient's clinical presentation, diagnosis and periprocedural management. To facilitate pericardiocentesis, periprocedural management included steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and factor replacement therapy. In other patients with suspected immune-mediated AVWS, a similar approach may be effective. This case also highlights the importance of distinguishing AVWS from inherited VWD.

Targeting von Willebrand disease: the current status and future directions of management therapies.

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the commonest inherited bleeding disorder, and is typically caused by deficits in the quantity or quality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). AREAS COVERED: This review describes the main clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of VWD, with particular attention to its management. In addition, standard and avant-garde replacement therapies based on the use of VWF are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The goal of treatment for VWD is to reverse the double hemostatic defect resulting from the abnormal or reduced expression of VWF and the concomitant factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. Treatment consists of managing any bleeds and both short-term prophylaxis (i.e. for surgery or invasive procedures) and long-term prophylaxis. While desmopressin is suitable for most patients with type 1 VWD, VWF/FVIII concentrates are the treatment of choice for the other types of VWD. Beside plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates, whose safety and efficacy have been demonstrated by several clinical trials, products containing only VWF, obtained by plasma fractionation and recombinant DNA technology, have become available and marketed more recently. The clinical use of these VWF-only products is particularly attractive in the setting of surgery and long-term prophylaxis, such as the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in cases of angiodysplasia.