Effectiveness of single intra-bursal injection of platelet-rich plasma against corticosteroid under ultrasonography guidance for shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of intra-bursal injection of single-dose platelet-rich plasma (PRP) against corticosteroids under ultrasonography guidance in shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 participants with a clinical diagnosis of SIS from a selected orthopedic clinic. Thirty participants in each arm were given a single dose of either PRP or triamcinolone acetonide into the subacromial sub-deltoid bursa (SASD) under ultrasonography guidance. The outcome variables assessed were the severity score of pain and the degree of shoulder abduction. Post-treatment follow-up was done in 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 week, the triamcinolone arm showed a statistically significant reduction of pain (p = 0.039) when compared to PRP. In the long term, PRP showed statistically significant improvement in shoulder abduction, compared to the triamcinolone injection (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: PRP and triamcinolone in the SASD bursa could be considered as safe treatment options for SIS under ultrasonography guidance. While triamcinolone was effective in short-term pain reduction, PRP was effective in long-term improvement in shoulder abduction.

Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis.

The goal of autoimmune hepatitis treatment is to achieve clinical and biochemical remission, which is associated with significantly improved outcomes. Induction treatment with corticosteroids and the subsequent addition of steroid-sparing therapy with gradual tapering of corticosteroids remains the standard of care. Several alternatives to azathioprine and second-line agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, sirolimus, or rituximab, have been evaluated in those with intolerance or inadequate response to standard-of-care therapy. Treatment withdrawal is achievable in less than 20% of patients after 2 years of sustained remission. Liver transplantation should be considered in those with progressive liver disease or those with complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma.

Impact of COVID-19 measures on exacerbation rates and healthcare visits in US asthma patients.

Objective: To compare exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in real-world patients in the United States who had moderate-to-severe asthma on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist therapy at different stages before and after the pandemic. Methods: This noninterventional, retrospective study described demographics, exacerbations, HCRU, and medication use in patients from a US-wide healthcare claims database in 4 consecutive years anchored around March 15, 2020 (start date of the first emergency health measures against coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], or the first lockdown, in the United States, termed "restriction onset" hereafter). Four cohorts of patients potentially eligible for moderate-to-severe asthma clinical trials at the beginning (index) of each of four 1-year periods (March 15, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, respectively) were built. Exacerbations, healthcare visits, and asthma medication use were counted in the 1-year period after the index for each cohort. Results: The prevalence of patients with one or more exacerbation per year decreased by 10.00% in the first year after the restriction onset compared with the year before and attenuated over time to 6.37% in the second year. The proportion of inpatient, emergency department, and physician's office visits remained stable over the time periods evaluated for all patients and those patients who experienced one or more exacerbations. Asthma treatment of patients who experienced one or more exacerbations also remained stable over the 4 years. Conclusion: The effect of COVID-19 public health measures on asthma exacerbation rates might have affected clinical trials being run during this period and should be considered in their analysis. Asthma clinical trials run under pandemic hygiene restrictions should consider lower exacerbation frequency in their study design, while treatment and healthcare visits seem unchanged.

Changes in Oral Corticosteroid Utilization in Patients with COPD Following Initiation of FF/UMEC/VI.

Purpose: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) play a role in the treatment of acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations; however, chronic use is not recommended due to the high rate of systemic complications, development of comorbidities, and increased mortality. Data assessing the real-world impact of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) on OCS utilization rates are limited. This study assessed the impact of FF/UMEC/VI on OCS use among patients with COPD previously treated with OCS. Patients and Methods: A retrospective database study of patients with COPD aged ≥40 years who initiated FF/UMEC/VI from 1 November 2017 to 31 December 2018, identified through the MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. Patients were required to have ≥1 dispensing of an OCS prior to initiation of FF/UMEC/VI (index) and were followed up for 12 months post-index. OCS utilization patterns, potential OCS-related adverse events, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs were compared between the 12-month pre- and post-index periods. Results: A total of 2013 patients were identified (mean age 63.5 years, 55.7% female). The proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS claim decreased by 32.2% between the pre- and post-index period (67.8% vs 100%; p < 0.001). Comparing the post-index period to the pre-index period, mean number of OCS pharmacy claims per patient decreased from 3.3 to 2.5 (p < 0.001) and mean daily dose was reduced from 3.1 to 2.6 mg/day (p = 0.004); 30.0% of patients reduced their daily dose by 90-100%. Reductions were also seen in COPD-related HCRU. The proportion of patients with an inpatient admission for COPD decreased from 11.4% to 7.1% (p < 0.001), emergency room visits decreased from 23.1% to 17.4% (p < 0.001), and office visits from 97.5% to 90.1% (p < 0.001). Similar results were seen for all-cause HCRU. Conclusion: Among patients with COPD with prior OCS use, FF/UMEC/VI initiation resulted in significant reductions in OCS utilization, COPD-related HCRU (including hospitalization), and all-cause HCRU.

Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids are some of the most frequently used drug classes in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, there is uncertainty as to whether effectiveness differences may exist among different intranasal specific medications. This systematic review aims to analyse and synthesise all evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in rhinitis nasal and ocular symptoms and in rhinoconjunctivitis-related quality-of-life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs (1) assessing patients ≥12 years old with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis and (2) comparing the use of intranasal antihistamines or corticosteroids versus placebo. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), the Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Certainty in the body of evidence for the analysed outcomes will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We will perform a random-effects meta-analysis for each assessed medication and outcome, presenting results as pooled mean differences and standardised mean differences. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses, considering (1) the risk of bias, (2) the follow-up period and (3) the drug dose. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical considerations will not be required. Results will be disseminated in a peer-review journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023416573.

Which Treatment Method Is Better in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Corticosteroid Injection, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, or Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning?

BACKGROUND: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a common disease that has various treatment options. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three of these options: corticosteroid injection (CSI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), and radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL). METHODS: The records of 229 patients treated with CSI (n = 81), ESWT (n = 76), or RTL (n = 72) were retrospectively analyzed. Visual analog scale scores, patient satisfaction-related success rates, repeated treatment rates, and initial treatment change rates were compared. RESULTS: Mean ± SD follow-up was 19.0 ± 4.5 months. Baseline clinical characteristics, mean visual analog scale scores (before treatment and at months 3, 6, and 12), patient satisfaction and success rates (at months 6 and 12), and repeated treatment and initial treatment change rates were similar between treatment groups. No complications were observed after the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: All three options-CSI, ESWT, and RTL-were found to be safe and effective in treating CPF, with similar outcomes up to 1 year. Use of CSIs is advantageous because it is more accessible than the other treatments. Similarly, the noninvasive nature of ESWT is glaring among other minimally invasive options. Therefore, the first-line treatment modality of CPF can be CSI or ESWT, depending on the patient's and physician's joint preference; RTL treatment should be tried in patients who do not respond to these treatments.

Administration of corticosteroid therapy for HELLP syndrome in pregnant women: evidences from seven randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: HELLP syndrome, featuring hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia, is life-threatening disease of pregnancy that triggers comorbidities in both pregnant women and the fetus/newborn. This study provides an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroids in maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Randomized control trials (RCTs) regarding the use of corticosteroids in the HELLP population from three electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, andCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from database inception to 23 March 202323 March 2023. RESULTS: A total of 485 patients treated with corticosteroids from 7 RCTs were included. Compared to placebo, corticosteroids therapy failed to significantly improve the maternal outcomes regard to maternal morbidity (RR = 1.36, 95%CI [0.45, 4.10]), eclampsia (RR = 1.16, 95%CI [0.76, 1.77]), acute renal failure (RR = 0.71, 95%CI [0.41, 1.22]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.34, 95%CI [0.10, 1.15]) and oliguria (RR = 1.08, 95%CI [0.75, 1.54]). In addition, pooled data showed that it wasn't significant differences between corticosteroids therapy and placebo regarding neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study compared the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with HELLP syndrome, revealing that corticosteroids did not provide any significant benefit in clinical outcomes for pregnant women and newborns with HELLP. The conclusions of this study must be verified by a larger sample of high-quality RCTs.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with secondary bacterial pneumonia among COVID-19 patients in ICU.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 and secondary infections developing during COVID-19 follow-up are one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICU). In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized patients due to COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: We studied all patients with bacterial pneumonia developed in patients with severe COVID-19 infection in the COVID-19 intensive care unit in a single-center hospital between March 16, 2020 and June 17, 2020. Patients hospitalized and followed up in the ICU for respiratory failure were examined in terms of secondary infection affecting morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-six (20%) of 471 patients had secondary bacterial pneumonia, respectively; of the leading pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (44.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (39.6%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.2%), Escherichia coli (3.1%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (3.1%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (3.1%), and Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (1%). The mortality rate among infected (75% / 47.5%) was significantly higher than in uninfected patients. Associated with the development of secondary bacterial pneumonia in COVID-19 patients; corticosteroid therapy [odds ratio (OR) 6250, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.383-28.571, p = 0.017), corticosteroid dose (OR 8.862 CI 2.299-70.258, p= 0.006), duration of mechanical ventilation (OR 1.199 CI) 1.088-1.322, p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary bacterial pneumonia was found to be associated with the severity and survival of the disease in patients admitted to ICU due to COVID-19. Duration of mechanical ventilation and use of corticosteroids and high-dose corticosteroids are risk factors for secondary bacterial pneumonia.

Antenatal Corticosteroid Treatment During the Late-Preterm Period and Neonatal Outcomes for Twin Pregnancies.

Importance: Antenatal corticosteroid treatment of individuals with singletons at risk for delivery during the late-preterm period has been academically recommended. However, the evidence on the use of antenatal corticosteroid treatment for twins at risk for delivery during the late-preterm period is still lacking. Objective: To evaluate whether antenatal corticosteroid treatment during the late-preterm period in twin pregnancies was associated with a lower risk of newborn morbidity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies delivered from February 1, 2013, to September 30, 2020, in a university-affiliated hospital in China included 1974 individuals with twin pregnancies who were at risk for late preterm birth (34 weeks and 0 days to 36 weeks and 6 days of gestation). Data were analyzed from June 30 to July 13, 2023. Exposures: Antenatal corticosteroid treatment during the late-preterm period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was composite neonatal respiratory morbidity, defined as at least 1 of the following postnatal occurrences in at least 1 neonate of the twins: respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, surfactant administration, transferred with respiratory complications, or neonatal death. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to analyze the association between antenatal corticosteroid treatment and the risk of neonatal outcomes. Results: The study population consisted of 1974 individuals with twin pregnancies, including 303 (15.3%; mean [SD] maternal age, 30.8 [4.2] years) who received antenatal corticosteroid treatment and 1671 (84.7%; mean [SD] maternal age, 31.2 [4.0] years) who did not receive antenatal corticosteroid treatment. The propensity score overlap weighting showed no significant differences between the antenatal corticosteroid treatment group and the no-antenatal corticosteroid treatment group in the risk of neonatal primary outcome (29 of 303 [9.6%] vs 41 of 1671 [2.5%]; weighted odds ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.60-2.76]). None of the subgroup interaction tests were significant for the neonatal primary outcome in terms of gestational age at delivery, year of delivery, chorionicity, at least 1 infant small for gestational age, intertwin growth discordance, and infant sex, and neither was the sensitivity analysis of using propensity score matching and a different administration-to-birth interval and treating twin infants as individuals. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found insufficient evidence that antenatal corticosteroid treatment during the late-preterm period in twin pregnancies could be associated with a lower risk of newborn morbidity. This new finding can provide a reference for clinical practice.

Conservative Management of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Conservative management has emerged as an attractive option for partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs). A single algorithmic treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic PT-RCT has not yet been developed. This systematic review aims to ascertain whether a conservative approach to PT-RCTs yields positive results in terms of clinical outcomes and functional recovery. METHODS: This is a systematic review of the literature on patients with PT-RCTs receiving conservative treatment with physiotherapy, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, collagen injections, hyaluronic acid (HA) injections, or corticosteroids injections coupled with polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN). Outcomes such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley Score evaluations, as well as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Euro Quality of Life-5D questionnaires were reported following a conservative approach. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Six articles explored the outcomes of patients with PT-RCT treated with PRP injections. Significant improvements in VAS for pain were observed. Two studies examined collagen injections and reported variations in VAS for pain and Constant-Murley Score. Sodium hyaluronate and HA injections were studied in two other articles, showing notable improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Corticosteroid and PDRN injections also displayed favorable outcomes. In addition, physical therapy protocols demonstrated improvements in VAS for pain and strength, particularly with eccentric rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of PT-RCTs, involving physical therapy, PRP injections, collagen injections, corticosteroid injections, HA injections, and PDRN in jections, demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, favorable results are observed in terms of decreased tear width and improved strength recovery, at least during a short-term follow-up. Unfortunately, long-term insight into the structural integrity of conservatively treated rotator cuff tendons following a partial injury has not been thoroughly evaluated yet. STUDY DESIGN LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-systematic review.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) that results from an immune-mediated reaction involving various antigens in susceptible individuals. However, the clinical characteristics and outcomes of HP in South Korea are not well understood. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to identify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of HP in South Korea. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study investigating patients with pathologically confirmed HP at our center, along with a comprehensive review of published HP cases in the Republic of Korea. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 43 patients with pathologically proven HP at a single tertiary hospital in Korea between 1996 and 2020. In addition, case reports of HP published in Korea were collected. The clinical characteristics, etiologies, treatment, and outcomes of patients from our center, as well as case reports, were reviewed. Patients from our hospital were divided into fibrotic and nonfibrotic subtypes according to the ATS/JRS/ALAT guidelines. RESULTS: Among 43 patients with biopsy-proven HP, 12 (27.9%) and 31 (72.1%) patients were classified into the fibrotic and nonfibrotic subtypes, respectively. The fibrotic HP group was older (64.6 ± 8.5 versus 55.2 ± 8.3, p = 0.002) with less frequent complaints of fever (0% versus 45.2%, p = 0.013) compared to the nonfibrotic HP group. The most common inciting antigen was household mold (21, 48.8%), followed by inorganic substances (6, 14.0%). Inciting antigens were not identified in eight (18.6%) patients. Treatment of corticosteroids was initiated in 34 (79.1%) patients. An analysis of 46 patients from Korea by literature review demonstrated that reported cases were relatively younger and drugs were the most common etiology compared to our cohort. CONCLUSION: The analysis of reported cases, as well as our cohort, showed that exposure history and clinical manifestations are heterogeneous for patients with HP in South Korea.

Antenatal corticosteroid therapy, delivery intervals and perinatal mortality in low-resource settings.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists regarding the ideal interval between the administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) and delivery. The study's objective was to assess the risks of perinatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) among preterm neonates whose mothers gave birth within 48 h of the administration of ACS and those whose mothers gave birth between 48 h and 7 days. METHODS: The study design was a secondary analysis of data from an observational prospective chart review study that was carried out in Tanzania in 2020. Preterm infants born to mothers who got at least one dose of ACS between 28 and 34 weeks of pregnancy were included. RESULTS: A total of 346 preterm neonates (294 singletons and 52 twins) were exposed to ACS. Compared to infants born 48 h following the first dose of ACS, those exposed to the drug between 48 h and 7 days had significantly decreased rates of perinatal mortality and RDS. Multivariable analysis revealed that infants exposed ACS between 48 h and 7 days prior to delivery had lower risk of perinatal mortality (aRR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66) and RDS (aRR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.52). CONCLUSION: The first dose of ACS given between 48 h and 7 days before delivery was associated with a lower risk of perinatal mortality and RDS than when the first dose was given <48 h before delivery. To improve neonatal outcomes, healthcare providers should consider administering ACS to mothers at the appropriate time.

Preterm infants exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) have lower rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Uncertainty exists regarding the ideal interval between the administration of ACS and delivery. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a study that included preterm infants born in four hospitals in Tanzania. We investigated whether there were differences in perinatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome between preterm neonates whose mothers delivered within 48 h of receiving a partial course of ACS and those whose mothers delivered between 48 h and 7 days after a full course of ACS therapy. Participants were the preterm infants of women who received ACS between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation. Neonates exposed to ACS between 48 h and 7 days prior to delivery had significantly lower risks of perinatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome compared to infants who were delivered <48 h after ACS administration. This finding highlights the importance of optimizing the timing of ACS administration to maximize its potential benefits and minimize risks to preterm neonates. To improve neonatal outcomes, healthcare providers should consider administering ACS to mothers at the appropriate time.

Phenotyping the Responses to Systemic Corticosteroids in the Management of Asthma Attacks (PRISMA): protocol for an observational and translational pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma and its associated exacerbation are heterogeneous. Although severe asthma attacks are systematically prescribed corticosteroids and often antibiotics, little is known about the variability of response to these therapies. Blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are type 2 inflammation biomarkers that have established mechanistic, prognostic and theragnostic values in chronic asthma, but their utility in acute asthma is unclear. We speculate that the clinical and biological response to those treatments varies according to inflammometry and microbiological test results. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An observational longitudinal pilot study with multimodal clinical and translational assessments will be performed on 50 physician-diagnosed ≥12-year-old asthmatics presenting with an asthma attack and 12 healthy controls, including blood eosinophil count (venous and point-of-care (POC) capillary blood), FeNO and testing for airway infection (sputum cultures and POC nasopharyngeal swabs). People with asthma will be assessed on day 0 and after a 7-day corticosteroid course, with home monitoring performed in between. The primary analysis will be the change in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s according to type 2 inflammatory status (blood eosinophils ≥0.15×109/L and/or FeNO ≥25 ppb) after treatment. Key secondary analyses will compare changes in symptom scores and the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference. Exploratory analyses will assess the relationship between clinical, lung function, inflammatory and microbiome parameters; satisfaction plus reliability indices of POC tests; and sex-gender variability in treatment response. Ultimately, this pilot study will serve to plan a larger trial comparing the clinical and biological response to systemic corticosteroids according to inflammatory biomarkers, offering valuable guidance for more personalised therapeutic strategies in asthma attacks. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (#2023-4687). Results will be communicated in an international meeting and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05870215).

Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case-control and cohort studies. RESULTS: For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.

Adding tiotropium or long-acting ß2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids: Asthma-related exacerbation risk and healthcare resource utilization.

Background: Based on current clinical guidelines, long-acting ß2-agonists (LABA) are frequently prescribed before long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) as an add-on to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in uncontrolled asthma. However, there is insufficient real-world evidence that supports this therapeutic approach. Objective: The objective was to compare asthma exacerbations and healthcare resource utilization in patients with asthma using the LAMA tiotropium bromide (Tio) or a LABA as an add-on to ICS (ICS + Tio or ICS/LABA) in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥12 years with asthma diagnoses identified in a U.S. longitudinal claims database (October 2015 to August 2020). The ICS + Tio and ICS/LABA cohorts were 1:2 propensity score matched for baseline variables. Outcomes were compared in the postmatched cohorts, and the risk of exacerbation was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: After propensity score matching, there were 633 and 1266 patients in the ICS + Tio and ICS/LABA cohorts, respectively. The proportion of patients who experienced a severe or a moderate-or-severe exacerbation during follow-up was similar between the ICS + Tio versus ICS/LABA cohorts (4% versus 3%, p = 0.472, and 50% versus 45%, p = 0.050, respectively). The mean time to first severe (ICS + Tio 43.8 days versus ICS/LABA 49.4 days, p = 0.758) and moderate-or-severe exacerbation (ICS + Tio 65.8 days versus ICS/LABA 58.9 days, p = 0.474) was not statistically different between cohorts. The treatments had no effect on the risk of severe exacerbation, although it was 36% lower in ICS + Tio users than in ICS/LABA users (hazard ratio 0.64 [95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.84]). All-cause and asthma-related average monthly healthcare resource utilization were comparable between the treatments for hospitalizations and emergency department visits but were significantly greater in the ICS + Tio cohort than in the ICS/LABA cohort for asthma-related outpatient visits (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence that ICS + Tio may be a valid alternative when ICS/LABA cannot be used as first-line treatment for asthma maintenance therapy.

Needle-free electronically controlled jet injection with corticosteroids in recalcitrant keloid scars: a retrospective study and patient survey.

First-line treatment of keloids consists of intralesional needle injections with corticosteroids, but generally entails multiple painful sessions, resulting in variable clinical outcomes. Novel needle-free jet injectors may facilitate more effective and patient-friendly dermal drug delivery. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability and patient satisfaction of intralesional triamcinolone-acetonide (TCA) treatment in recalcitrant keloids using an electronically controlled pneumatic injector (EPI). A retrospective study was conducted in recalcitrant keloid patients with a history of severe pain during needle injections who received three sessions of EPI + TCA. Outcome measures included Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), treatment-related pain (NRS), adverse effects, and patient satisfaction (survey). Ten patients with in total 283 keloids were included. The POSAS score significantly improved at follow-up and GAIS was reported as '(very) improved' for all patients. EPI + TCA was well-tolerated with a significantly lower NRS pain score compared to needle + TCA (pilot treatment). Only minor adverse effects occurred, and 90% of patients preferred EPI over needle treatment. EPI + TCA is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with recalcitrant keloids. The minimal treatment-related pain and high patient satisfaction makes it a promising treatment for patients with needle-phobia and/or severe pain during needle injections.

Allergic rhinitis: Review of the diagnosis and management: South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group.

BACKGROUND:  Allergic rhinitis (AR) has a significant impact on the community as a whole with regard to quality of life and its relationship to allergic multi-morbidities. Appropriate diagnosis, treatment and review of the efficacy of interventions can ameliorate these effects. Yet, the importance of AR is often overlooked, and appropriate therapy is neglected. The availability of effective medications and knowledge as to management are often lacking in both public and private health systems. METHODS:  This review is based on a comprehensive literature search and detailed discussions by the South African Allergic Rhinitis Working Group (SAARWG). RESULTS:  The working group provided up-to-date recommendations on the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis and management of AR, appropriate to the South African setting. CONCLUSION:  Allergic rhinitis causes significant, often unappreciated, morbidity. It is a complex disease related to an inflammatory response to environmental allergens. Therapy involves education, evaluation of allergen sensitisation, pharmacological treatment, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and evaluation of the success of interventions. Regular use of saline; the important role of intranasal corticosteroids, including those combined with topical antihistamines and reduction in the use of systemic steroids are key. Practitioners should have a thorough knowledge of associated morbidities and the need for specialist referral.Contribution: This review summarises the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of AR such that it is a resource that allows easy access for family practitioners and specialists alike.

[CQ IN THE LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OF ADULT ASTHMATIC PATIENTS WHO ARE NOT ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED WITH INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS MONOTHERAPY, WHICH IS MORE BENEFICIAL: ADDING A LONG ACTING BETA2 AGONIST OR A LONG ACTING MUSCARINIC ANTAGONIST?]

Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) are preferred add-on treatment for adult asthmatic patients whose symptoms cannot be controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) alone. However, over the last decade, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) have gained approval for use in treating asthma, and their efficacy is anticipated. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to investigate whether the addition of LABA or LAMA is more beneficial for the long-term management of adult asthmatic patients poorly controlled on ICS monotherapy. We extracted eight relevant randomized controlled trials (represented in 18 articles) conducted by June 2022 form the corresponding Cochrane review and additional searches through medical databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and ICHUSHI (https://www.jamas.or.jp/)). While the LAMA add-on group showed a significantly better improvement in some respiratory function tests, the difference between groups did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). On the other hand, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, a quality of life metric, was significantly higher in the LABA add-on group, but the difference also did not surpass the MCID. Because no outcomes exceeded the MCID, we could not determine whether adding LABA or LAMA on ICS is more beneficial in the long-term management of adult asthmatic patients. Given that no significant differences were found in the incidence of adverse events (including serious ones), when specific adverse events associated with one treatment occur, switching to the other treatment (from LABA to LAMA, or vice versa) can be considered as an option.

PAPA Syndrome: Challenges in Achieving Long-Term Remission.

For over two decades, the acronym PAPA syndrome has been used to describe an autoinflammatory condition caused by missense mutations in the PSTPIP1 (proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 1) gene and clinically characterized by the presence of pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), and acne (1,2). Due to the involvement of the PSTPIP1 gene in the regulation of innate immunity, mutations of this gene cause abnormal activation of inflammasomes, complexes of NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 proteins. As a result, production of interleukin-1ß, a key molecule that triggers synthesis of cytokines necessary for the recruitment of neutrophils, is significantly increased (2,3). Additionally, the levels of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (INF-γ) and interleukin 17 (IL-7) are also elevated, which further disrupts inflammatory mechanisms in the microenvironment (4). Since hyperproduction of IL-1 and other involved cytokines is the predominant event in the pathogenesis, these molecules are promising targets in the treatment of PAPA syndrome. Corticosteroids and biologics are currently the most commonly used agents for inducing and hastening remission of symptoms (5). A substantial step forward in the treatment of PAPA syndrome has been the introduction of medications blocking the cytokines crucial in the pathogenesis of this disorder, with TNF-α and IL-1 inhibitors being the most frequent choice of such biological therapy (6). We report the case of a 22-year-old male patient with PAPA syndrome who was referred to our department 18 months ago due to exacerbation of skin changes. Initial presentation and subsequent evolution of disease in this patient matched the typical clinical pattern of PAPA syndrome. The first symptoms occurred at the age of two in the form of unspecific joint disease that was diagnosed as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Subsequently, in the early adolescence the patient presented with new skin changes manifesting as severe acne and persistent pyoderma gangrenosum-like ulcers. At the same time, severity of joint involvement gradually decreased. After the characteristic phenotype of the disease had fully developed, suspicion of possible syndromic origin of symptoms arose. For this reason, genetic analysis was performed as requested by attending pediatricians at the University Clinical Center in Sarajevo, and E250Q mutation of the PSTPIP1 gene was detected. Thus, the diagnosis of PAPA syndrome was confirmed. Throughout the duration of the disease, several types of medication had been introduced in the treatment with varying success. Earliest joint symptoms were alleviated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, while repeated courses of corticosteroids were the mainstay of the therapy during a decade-long period. As a consequence of prolonged steroid therapy, growth disorder, among various other side-effects, had been especially pronounced. Acting as a classic steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent, methotrexate had also been part of the patient's treatment regimen. Lastly, biologics, including both TNF-α and IL-a inhibitors, had been separately administered as the remaining treatment options. However, adalimumab expressed a predominant effect on joint symptoms, whereas re-activation of previously undetected Hepatitis-B infection occurred during the subsequent therapy with anakinra. Due to this adverse reaction, anakinra treatment was discontinued. At the initial examination, the patient presented with multiple erythematous, partially excoriated papules and nodules, along with residual post-inflammatory hyperpigmented patches and scars on the skin of the whole back, chest, shoulders, and upper arms (Figure 1, Figure 2). The presence of postoperative scars on the elbows, resulting from previously performed surgical procedures of persistently affected joints with the goal of achieving pain relief and functional improvement, was also observed. Several smaller ulcers with undermined edges (Figure 3), as well as residual hyperpigmentation and cicatrices (Figure 4) were visible on the lower extremities. Additionally, the patient reported appearance of pustules and non-healing ulcers after minor trauma, which corresponds to the pathergy phenomenon, a common feature of PAPA syndrome. In contrast to the severity of cutaneous changes, the joint symptoms were mild. After thorough assessment of the patient's medical history and current condition, a multi-agent regimen was initiated, consisting of adalimumab, isotretinoin, and prednisone. Regular check-ups during the 12 months of treatment showed that the applied agents stabilized the patient's condition, alleviated more severe and acute skin changes, and slowed down further exacerbation of symptoms. Due to the rarity of PAPA syndrome, data on its treatment is scarce. Official guidelines are non-existing, and available information is based on case reports, case series, and a few smaller retrospective studies (5,7). In general, response to therapy remains inconsistent between patients, despite introduction of novel drugs. Furthermore, single treatment regimens are often not equally effective for all manifestations of the disease, which in a number of cases results in the administration of multi-agent treatment (2). As described in our case report, we opted for a multi-agent regimen not only due to specific individual role of each drug in the treatment of PAPA syndrome but also because of the possible augmented effect of combined therapy. Initially, a short course of systemic corticosteroid (prednisone 30 mg/day for 3 weeks) was introduced in order to alleviate acute symptoms until other agents started showing their effects. The initial dose of administered corticosteroid was gradually tapered by 5 mg every week and soon discontinued. Adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks for 12 months) was chosen since its previous administration was without significant adverse effects and with more acceptable end results, unlike therapy with anakinra (8). In addition, TNF-α inhibitors, such as adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, have been generally regarded as a more effective treatment option for cutaneous changes, while anakinra, an anti-IL-1 agent, has been more beneficial in alleviating joint symptoms (9-11). Since the skin of our patient was significantly more affected than the joints, adalimumab was a preferred option for biological treatment. Finally, isotretinoin (0.5 mg/kg/day for 6 months) also found a place in our multi-agent therapy plan as a specific, supportive treatment agent for acne (12). Due to the fact that our national health insurance system covered the costs of treatment with TNF-α inhibitors for only 12 months, adalimumab had to be discontinued after the end of this period. Episodes of acute exacerbation that the patient experienced after the cessation of multi-agent regimen were addressed with systemic corticosteroids and symptomatic therapy. Based on case reports, corticosteroids are usually one of the first agents to be administered in patients diagnosed with PAPA syndrome. They are frequently effective in alleviating joint symptoms, but, on the other hand, high doses of corticosteroids can worsen acne lesions (6). Moreover, due to the multiple side-effects of corticosteroids, such as electrolyte abnormalities, hypertension, hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, growth suppression, and adrenal insufficiency (13), a steroid-sparing agent is typically introduced into treatment together with or after corticosteroid therapy. A substantial step forward in the treatment of PAPA syndrome has been achieved with the introduction of medications targeting cytokines crucial in the pathogenesis of this disorder. The two most commonly used groups of such biological drugs have been those that block TNF-α and IL-1. A longer lasting improvement of symptoms has been achieved in a number of cases with both types of agents. Since other medications have often failed to establish long-term control of PAPA syndrome, such effects can be seen as a valuable accomplishment (6,14). Regardless of this observation, the response to treatment still differs between patients. More variable effects have been documented for IL-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra, while TNF-α inhibitors, such as adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept, have been associated with more steady responses (4,6,10). The inconsistent effect of biologic therapies could be explained by the fact that PSTPIP1 protein is involved in various biochemical processes in different cells of the immune system. Thuse, none of the medications has an adequate spectrum of activity to control all involved immunological pathways (5,15). Overall, due to scarcity of valid information and guidelines, there is an increasing need for multicentric randomized controlled trials that would provide evidence-based data on effective treatment options for PAPA syndrome. Despite the rarity of this disorder, extensive research should be performed in order to discover therapies that could successfully manage all different manifestations of PAPA syndrome. Consequently, such efforts and breakthroughs would lead to decreased mortality and improved quality of life for patients suffering from this debilitating disease. The case described herein shows that PAPA syndrome can remain undiagnosed for longer periods of time, resulting in delayed treatment. Furthermore, the available therapeutic options are not sufficient to achieve long-term remission in many patients. Thus, continuous and comprehensive research is vital for ensuring adequate care of patients with PAPA syndrome.