ABSTRACT
Neuromuscular alterations are reported in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and conservative treatment (copers with ACL deficiency, ACL-C). However, it is unclear whether sex influences neuromuscular control. The objective was to investigate differences in neuromuscular control regarding sex and treatment type one year after ACL rupture in comparison to a group with an intact ACL (ACL-I). Electromyography of vastus medialis (VM) and lateralis, biceps femoris (BF) and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded in ACL-R (N = 38), ACL-C (N = 26), and ACL-I (N = 38) during stair descent and reflex activity by anterior tibial translation while standing. The movements of stair descent were divided into pre-activity, weight-acceptance and push-off phases, reflex activity in pre-activation, short, medium (MLR), and long latency responses (LLR). Normalized root mean squares for each muscle of involved and matched control limb per phase were calculated and analyzed with two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). During stair descent, neuromuscular differences of BF were significant during push-off only (p = 0.001). Males of ACL-R and ACL-C had higher BF activity compared to ACL-I (p = 0.009, 0.007 respectively). During reflex activity, VM and BF were significantly different between treatment groups for pre-activation (p = 0.013, 0.035 respectively). VM pre-activation of females was higher in ACL-R compared to ACL-C (p = 0.018), and lower in ACL-C compared to ACL-I (p = 0.034). Males of ACL-R showed higher VM and less BF pre-activation (p = 0.025, p = 0.003 respectively) compared to ACL-I. Males of ACL-C had less BF pre-activation compared to ACL-I (p = 0.019). During MLR, intra-group differences in ST were found for treatment (p = 0.011) and females of ACL-R compared to ACL-I (p = 0.015). During LLR, overall intra-group differences in VM were present for treatment (p = 0.034) and in females (ACL-R versus ACL-C (p = 0.015), ACL-I (p = 0.049), respectively). One year after an ACL rupture, neuromuscular alterations persist regardless of treatment and sex. Standard rehabilitation protocols may not be able to restore neuromuscular control. Future research should include long-term follow up and focus on exercises targeting neuromuscular function.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Male , Humans , Female , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Tibia , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Analysis of Variance , Quadriceps MuscleABSTRACT
Posterior tibial slope angle (PTSA) is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and has attracted a lot of attention, but its mechanism of action and diagnosis are still not systematically studied in the field of sports medicine. In this paper, we believe that PTSA should be measured by full-length lower extremity films and combined with multiple imaging data for comprehensive assessment to reduce errors. A large PTSA may increases risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury, so patients with more than 12 degrees of PTSA should be treated by preserving meniscus as much as possible during ACL reconstruction and combining with tibial osteotomy if necessary, which could effectively prevent risk of ligament re-injury. At the same time, gait analysis has an important reference value for preoperative pathogenic pattern and postoperative rehabilitation function, so the author believes that it will have a guiding significance for the development of individualized rehabilitation strategy based on PTSA, in order to achieve the best treatment effect.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Lower ExtremityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Bone tunnel widening (TW) is a well-described complication after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic bone TW and clinical outcomes in patients with ACLR performed with suspensory fixation on both the femoral and tibial tunnels using different soft tissue grafts. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a soft tissue graft (hamstring autograft or allograft or quadriceps autograft) using an all-inside technique were included for analysis. Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel width was measured postoperatively on anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs at a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form as well as assessing patient records for complication data. RESULTS: Fifty patients (15 quadriceps autografts, 24 hamstring autografts, 11 hamstring allografts) were included in this study. The quadriceps autograft cohort was the youngest, (16.6 ± 2.8 years), followed by the hamstring autograft cohort (27.7 ± 9.0 years), and the hamstring allograft cohort (48.2 ± 9.4 years; p < 0.001) for all comparisons. Quadriceps autografts experienced less tibial tunnel-widening (0.6 ± 0.6 mm) than hamstring autografts (2.0 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.011), which, in turn, experienced less widening than hamstring allografts (3.9 ± 2.3 mm; p < 0.001). Quadriceps autografts also experienced less femoral tunnel widening (0.3 ± 0.6 mm) than hamstring autografts (2.1 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.001) which, in turn, experienced less tunnel-widening than hamstring allografts (4.0 ± 2.1; p < 0.001). At follow-up, mean IKDC for hamstring autografts, quadriceps autografts, and hamstring allografts were 79.9 ± 17.9, 88.5 ± 7.1, and 77.7 ± 20.4, respectively (p = 0.243). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with respect to postoperative complications; p = 0.874. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps autograft resulted in the least tunnel widening compared to hamstring autograft and allograft when using an all-inside suspensory fixation device. Both autograft groups resulted in less widening than the allograft group. Despite the greatest increased radiographic tunnel widening in the allograft group, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes or knee laxity.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Arthroplasty , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgeryABSTRACT
This study investigated whether oral supplementation with protease-soluble chicken type II collagen (PSCC-II) mitigates the progression of anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT)-induced osteoarthritis (OA) in rats. Eight-week-old male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to the following groups: control, sham, ACLT, group A (ACLT + pepsin-soluble collagen type II collagen (C-II) with type I collagen), group B (ACLT + Amano M-soluble C-II with type I collagen), group C (ACLT + high-dose Amano M-soluble C-II with type I collagen), and group D (ACLT + unproteolyzed C-II). Various methods were employed to analyze the knee joint: nociceptive tests, microcomputed tomography, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry. Rats treated with any form of C-II had significant reductions in pain sensitivity and cartilage degradation. Groups that received PSCC-II treatment effectively mitigated the ACLT-induced effects of OA concerning cancellous bone volume, trabecular number, and trabecular separation compared with the ACLT alone group. Furthermore, PSCC-II and unproteolyzed C-II suppressed ACLT-induced effects, such as the downregulation of C-II and upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-13, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-1ß. These results indicate that PSCC-II treatment retains the protective effects of traditional undenatured C-II and provide superior benefits for OA management. These benefits encompass pain relief, anti-inflammatory effects, and the protection of cartilage and cancellous bone.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Peptide Hydrolases , Male , Rats , Animals , Collagen Type II , Chickens , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Collagen Type I , X-Ray Microtomography , Rats, Wistar , Endopeptidases , Administration, Oral , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Pain ThresholdABSTRACT
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently injured knee ligament, typically in non-contact athletic injuries in young adults. Mucoid degeneration of the ACL (ACL-MD) is an uncommon ACL pathology in which glycosaminoglycans deposition within the collagenous bundles leads to hypertrophy, loss of full knee flexion and knee pain without instability. ACL-MD usually presents in individuals over 40 years with sudden-onset knee pain after minimal trauma or as an incidental MRI finding. ACL-MD is rarely described in young adults. We present a case of ACL-MD in a previously healthy adult in his early 20s who presented with 3-month recalcitrant dull left knee pain and limited range of motion after 'stepping funny' with slight twisting. This case highlights the need to critically reflect on the anatomical structures when presented with musculoskeletal pathologies and to consider the unique presentation of musculoskeletal disease in atypical age groups.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Joint Instability , Young Adult , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Autografts , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Pain , Range of Motion, ArticularABSTRACT
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques have substantially evolved over the past several decades, driven by evidence that nonanatomic techniques increase the risk for instability, loss of motion, surgical failure, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Early techniques used transtibial femoral tunnel drilling, although improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics has led to independent femoral tunnel. Anatomic ACLR requires careful consideration of the native ACL dimensions and orientation. Although there is significant variation between patients, understanding of anatomic patterns allows for reliable identification of the ACL footprints and appropriate tunnel positioning, particularly in chronic injuries where the remanent ACL stump is degraded or absent. The femoral tunnel should be placed low and posterior on the lateral femoral condyle using the lateral intercondylar and bifurcate ridges as landmarks. The center of the tibial footprint can be determined by referencing the medial tibial spine and posterior border of anterior horn of lateral meniscus. Measurement of the dimensions of the native ACL and intercondylar notch is also critical for determining graft size and minimizing the risk of impingement, with a goal of reconstructing 50% to 80% of the tibial footprint area. Clinical outcome studies have demonstrated superior anteroposterior and rotatory knee stability with low surgical revision rates (reported between 3% and 5%). By adhering to the principles of anatomic ACLR, surgeons can produce an appropriately sized and located graft for the individual patient, thereby best restoring native knee kinematics and maximizing function. The aim of this infographic is to highlight essential features of anatomic ACLR techniques, which a focus on the native anatomy and surgical planning to achieve an anatomic ACLR.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Knee Joint , Tibia/surgery , Femur/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methodsABSTRACT
CASE: A 21-year-old woman presented with sepsis from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, patellar osteomyelitis, and 6 × 4 × 2-cm proximal anteromedial soft-tissue defect 1 week after bone-tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). She underwent multiple irrigation and debridement (I&Ds), hardware removal, bone grafting with antibiotic-loaded tricalcium phosphate beads, and medial gastrocnemius perforator flap with plastic surgery. At 18 months after her initial ACL-R, single-stage revision ACL-R with quadriceps autograft was performed. CONCLUSION: When acute ACL-R infection does not respond to initial I&D and Intravenous (IV) antibiotics, retained hardware and graft tissue must be removed expeditiously to prevent sepsis, osteomyelitis, and soft-tissue defects.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Osteomyelitis , Perforator Flap , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Osteomyelitis/surgeryABSTRACT
Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be performed in a single surgery, but in some instances, it requires 2 stages to get it right. The most common reasons for staged reconstruction include dilated bone tunnels on the tibial or femoral side (>13 mm), imperfectly placed bone tunnels that cannot be reused but cannot be avoided, and/or the need to combine the revision ACL reconstruction with meniscus and/or cartilage allograft transplantation. In my practice, we use prefabricated bone dowels, sizing up 0.5 to 1 mm relative to the size of the tunnel (after debridement) for both the femoral side and tibial side. The benefits are efficiency and reproducibility, while the challenges include cost and the potential need for multiple dowels if the prefabricated dowels are not long enough. We will occasionally add demineralized bone matrix, particularly on the tibial side, in the event that there is <5 mm of unfilled tunnel using the bone dowel. We wait â¼3 months before proceeding to the second stage using only plain radiographs to assess healing (advanced imaging such as computed tomography scan is not routinely used). We have also begun to push the limits of single-stage revision reconstruction, using dowels in a single setting. No matter what, it is never wrong to perform ACL revision reconstruction as a 2-stage procedure. When performed for the appropriate indications, outcomes tend to be good, regardless of the chosen technique.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Tibia/transplantation , Femur/surgery , Reoperation/methodsABSTRACT
Athletes face an uphill battle after an anterior cruciate ligament tear if they want to return to their sport. Almost one-third of patients never return to their preinjury level of sport involvement, and many athletes dread this outcome. Although this distress is an understandable reaction, it can be demotivating, and psychological engagement in the recovery process is crucial to achieving desired outcomes. In particular, psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with greater likelihood of returning to sport. However, other psychological factors, including kinesiophobia, can negatively impact readiness to return to sport preoperatively and postoperatively. Supporting patients psychologically and reducing kinesiophobia throughout the recovery process may be essential to improving outcomes after an anterior cruciate ligament tear.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Sports , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/psychology , Kinesiophobia , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Sports/psychology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/psychology , Return to Sport/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Different types of grafts can be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is little published data regarding skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical outcomes and complications for different autograft types used in all-epiphyseal, transphyseal and partial epiphyseal/hybrid ACLR in skeletally immature children and adolescents. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for literature regarding ACLR using hamstrings, quadriceps or bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts in skeletally immature patients. Studies were included if they examined at least one of the following outcomes: graft failure, return to sport(s), growth disturbance, arthrofibrosis or patient reported outcomes and had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Case reports, conference abstracts and studies examining allografts and extra-articular or over-the-top ACL reconstruction techniques were excluded. Graft failure rates were pooled for each graft type using the quality effects model of MetaXL. A qualitative synthesis of secondary outcomes was performed. RESULTS: The database search identified 242 studies. In total 31 studies were included in this review, comprising of 1358 patients. Most patients (81%) were treated using hamstring autograft. The most common used surgical technique was transphyseal. The weighted, pooled failure rate for each graft type was 12% for hamstring tendon autografts, 8% for quadriceps tendon autografts and 6% for BPTB autografts. Confidence intervals were overlapping. The variability in time to graft failure was high. The qualitative analysis of the secondary outcomes showed similar results with good clinical outcomes and low complication rates across all graft types. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review it is not possible to determine a superior graft type for ACLR in skeletally immature. Of the included studies, the most common graft type used was the hamstring tendon. Overall, graft failure rates are low, and most studies show good clinical outcomes with high return to sports rates.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Autografts/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The association between chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and inferior postoperative outcomes following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has been highlighted in the literature. However, the inclusion of postoperative radiological assessments in previous studies has been limited. The aim of this study is to investigate whether chronic ACL injury is associated with an inferior tibiofemoral position measured on magnetic resonance (MR) images after primary ACLR. METHODS: A total of 62 patients that underwent primary ACLR were included in this study based on the time from injury to surgery, namely the acute ACL-injured group (within 6 weeks) and the chronic ACL-injured group (more than 1 year) and were matched 1:1 according to sex, age (± 2 years), and time from surgery to follow-up (± 3 months). Patient demographics, surgical records and follow-up data were retrieved and analyzed. The altered tibiofemoral position was measured quantitatively on preoperative and at least 1-year postoperative MR images and compared between the two groups, including the lateral, medial and global anterior tibial subluxation (LATS, MATS and GATS) and internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS). RESULTS: No significant differences in preoperative LATS, MATS, GATS or IRTS were identified between the acute and chronic ACL-injured groups. The chronic ACL-injured patients showed significantly increased postoperative MATS (p = 0.001) and GATS (p = 0.012), while no significant difference was identified in postoperative LATS or IRTS. Multivariate linear regression analyses showed that chronic ACL injury resulted in an estimated increase of 2.0 mm in postoperative MATS (p = 0.012) and 1.9 mm in postoperative GATS (p = 0.040). A significant improvement in postoperative LATS was observed in the acute ACL-injured group (p = 0.044) compared to preoperative LATS, while no improvements in these MRI measurements were observed in the chronic ACL-injured group. CONCLUSION: Chronic ACL-injured patients showed increased MATS and GATS measured on 1-year postoperative MR images after primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction, while no difference was identified in rotational tibiofemoral position. The acute ACL-injured group demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative LATS, whereas no improvements were observed in the chronic ACL-injured group. Level of evidence Level III.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Joint Dislocations , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Tibia/diagnostic imaging , Tibia/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Grit is the disposition to strive for long-term goals despite setbacks and challenges. Given the lengthy, arduous process of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), an athlete's grit may predict postoperative outcomes across time. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the relationships between baseline (preoperative) grit and postoperative knee outcomes across the year after ACLR among adolescents. We hypothesized that athletes with more grit would achieve better postoperative outcomes over time than less gritty athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: All participants completed the Short Grit Scale, the Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKDC) Scale, the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pediatric scale for pain interference and mobility, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS), and the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (NeuroQoL) Lower Extremity Function Short Form at a preoperative appointment and then again at approximately 3, 6, and 12 months after ACLR. We constructed linear mixed models to assess the relationships between baseline grit, time, age, sex, and postoperative outcome measures (statistical significance of α = .05). RESULTS: We included 137 participants (mean age 15.8 ± 2.74 years, 70% female) from a prospective registry of athletes undergoing ACLR by 1 surgeon at a single institution. There were no statistically significant changes in grit over time or differences in grit between age and sex. Higher baseline grit was significantly associated with greater postoperative HSS Pedi-FABS scores (ß = 3.72 ± 1.46; P = .01; 95% CI, 0.85-6.59) and NeuroQoL scores across time (ß = 3.37 ± 0.93; P < .001; 95% CI, 1.55-5.20). There were no significant associations between baseline grit and Pedi-IKDC, Lysholm, and PROMIS pain interference or mobility scores. CONCLUSION: Athletes with higher baseline grit reported superior postoperative physical function and activity level over the course of 1 year after ACLR compared with less gritty athletes. Grit may be a useful measure in predicting success in regaining physical function across time after ACLR in adolescent athletes.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Adolescent , Humans , Female , Child , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Cohort Studies , Quality of Life , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Return to Sport , Knee Joint/surgery , Lower Extremity , Athletes , PainABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either contralateral or ipsilateral tendon autografts. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published from inception to December 9, 2022, in multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, performed the risk of bias assessment and assessed the study quality. At least one of the following outcomes was evaluated for each study: muscle strength (isometric strength of the quadriceps or hamstring muscles, isokinetic peak flexion torque of the hamstring, or isokinetic peak extension torque of the hamstring), knee laxity examination, Lysholm score, pivot shift, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lachman test result, return to sports time, or incidence of complications. A random effects model was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Four hundred scientific manuscripts were recovered in the initial search. After screening, 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 9 cohort studies, and 1 case- control study) met the search criteria for the qualitative analysis. Among them, 9 cohort studies were used for the quantitative analysis. The results showed few statistically significant differences in terms of muscle strength (contralateral group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus nonoperative group), Lysholm score, and return to sports time. A comparison showed no significant differences in knee laxity, IKDC score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test score, or incidence of complication, or contralateral rupture. CONCLUSIONS: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the contralateral autologous tendon has a similar effect as the ipsilateral autologous tendon.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Hamstring Tendons , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Joint/physiology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Tendons/surgery , Autografts/surgery , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Hamstring Tendons/transplantationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR). PURPOSE: The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded. RESULTS: The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08). CONCLUSION: At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Hamstring Tendons , Sports , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Hamstring Tendons/transplantation , Return to Sport , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
Several tendon and ligament animal models were presented at the 2022 Orthopaedic Research Society Tendon Section Conference held at the University of Pennsylvania, May 5 to 7, 2022. A key objective of the breakout sessions at this meeting was to develop guidelines for the field, including for preclinical tendon and ligament animal models. This review summarizes the perspectives of experts for eight surgical small and large animal models of rotator cuff tear, flexor tendon transection, anterior cruciate ligament tear, and Achilles tendon injury using the framework: "Why, Who, What, Where, When, and How" (5W1H). A notable conclusion is that the perfect tendon model does not exist; there is no single gold standard animal model that represents the totality of tendon and ligament disease. Each model has advantages and disadvantages and should be carefully considered in light of the specific research question. There are also circumstances when an animal model is not the best approach. The wide variety of tendon and ligament pathologies necessitates choices between small and large animal models, different anatomic sites, and a range of factors associated with each model during the planning phase. Attendees agreed on some guiding principles including: providing clear justification for the model selected, providing animal model details at publication, encouraging sharing of protocols and expertise, improving training of research personnel, and considering greater collaboration with veterinarians. A clear path for translating from animal models to clinical practice was also considered as a critical next step for accelerating progress in the tendon and ligament field.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Rotator Cuff Injuries , Tendon Injuries , Animals , Tendons , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of two intraoperative pain management protocols on the need for additional opioids in patients receiving an epidural and periarticular liposomal bupivacaine (PLB) vs. PLB alone in the 12-24 h period after undergoing a TPLO. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: One hundred seventy-four dogs with cranial cruciate ligament tears presenting for TPLO. METHODS: Medical records of dogs presenting for a unilateral or bilateral cranial cruciate ligament tear who had a TPLO performed were reviewed for signalment, weight, body condition score, and peri-operative pain management protocol. Dogs were divided into two groups: those who received an epidural and PLB, and those who received only PLB. Post-operative opioid administration was recorded for each group. RESULTS: Patients who received an epidural and PLB received fewer postoperative opioids. There were 36% fewer opioid injections administered to dogs who received epidurals compared to dogs who did not receive epidurals (IRR) (95% CI) = 0.64 (0.45-0.92), P = 0.02). BCS was not a significant predictor of the post-operative opioid requirement (IRR (95% CI) = 1.3 (0.75-2.4), P = 0.38). When adjusting for BCS as a possible confounder, there were 39% fewer opioid injections in dogs who received epidurals than dogs without (IRR (95% CI) = 0.61 (0.42-0.88), P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative opioid administration was significantly diminished in patients receiving both an epidural and PLB. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Administration of an epidural in addition to infiltration of PLB significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative opioid administration in dogs undergoing a TPLO.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Dog Diseases , Dogs , Animals , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Incidence , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/veterinary , Osteotomy/veterinary , Osteotomy/methods , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Tibia/surgery , Dog Diseases/surgeryABSTRACT
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a type of orthopaedic knee surgery and physiotherapy rehabilitation is undertaken for several months postoperatively, often with the aim of returning the patient to sport. Variations in postoperative protocols to guide rehabilitation exist between National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. Although there is no single guideline to guide clinicians, strong evidence does support several clinical measures to be included post-ACLR, to improve outcomes and reduce the need for revision surgery. This project aimed to align our NHS Trust's ACLR physiotherapy care with best-evidence.A literature review was completed to establish key quality standards for ACLR rehabilitation. A retrospective notes audit was then undertaken to quantify the baseline quality of care, measured against these standards. Quality improvement methods were used to improve the quality of care and postoperative rehabilitation processes for ACLR patients. A new evidence-based, postoperative rehabilitation protocol was created, a core group of clinicians was formed to see ACLR patients and a rehabilitation class, solely for ACLR patients was also implemented.The key process measure for the project was patients engaging in 'criteria-driven progressions of rehabilitation'. This 'criteria-driven progressions' rate increased from 0% at baseline to 100% during the project period. Overall, non-attendance rates maintained at a similar level from 5.4% at baseline to a final rate of 4.8%. There was also an increase in mean 'return to sport' times, from 6 to 9.9 months, which is in line with best-evidence recommendations.The previous rehabilitation provided in our trust was not aligned with current evidence. This quality improvement project has led to improvements in patient care and lessons from the project will allow other trusts to learn from the changes made, to improve their own care pathways.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Knee Injuries , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/rehabilitation , Knee Injuries/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Outpatients , State Medicine , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/rehabilitationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the distribution of femoral tunnel and explore the influences of bone tunnel positions on knee functions. The bone landmark positioning method was used to position the femoral tunnel during the anatomical reconstruction surgery in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent anatomical reconstruction of the ACL between January 2015 and July 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. The distribution of the femoral tunnel was recorded on 3-D CT after surgery. The tunnel positions were classified into good and poor position groups based on whether the position was in the normal range (24-37% on the x-axis and 28-43% on the y-axis). The Lysholm and IKDC scores, KT-1000 side-to-side difference, pivot shift test and Lachman test results of the knee joints were recorded, and then the differences in knee joint functions between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: 84 eligible patients (84 knees) were finally included in this study. Twenty-two and 62 of the patients were categorized in the good and poor position groups, respectively, and the rate of good position was 26.2%. The distribution of bone tunnel was as follows: (x-axis) deep position in 10 patients (12%), normal position in 58 patients (69%), and shallow position in 16 patients (19%); (y-axis) high position in 54 patients (64%), normal position in 26 patients (31%), and low position in 4 patients (5%). 1 year later, the Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly better in the good position group (P < 0.05), the KT-1000 side to side difference, the pivot shift test and Lachman test results were better in the good position group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The bone tunnels were found to be distributed in and beyond the normal range using the bone landmark method to position the femoral tunnel in the single-bundle anatomical reconstruction of ACL, while the rate of good bone tunnel position was low. The knee joint function scores and stability were lower in patients with poor position of the femoral tunnel.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Retrospective Studies , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knee joint position sense (JPS) might be negatively affected after injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Recent systematic reviews suggest further investigation of psychometric properties, including validity, of knee JPS tests following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). This study investigated the known-group validity by comparing knee JPS errors between individuals who underwent unilateral ACLR and healthy controls. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 36 men, including 19 after ACLR (ACLR group) and 17 healthy controls (control group). In both groups, the absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE) of passive knee JPS were calculated in the flexion and extension directions, for two target angles (30° and 60° flexion) per direction. Discriminative validity was evaluated by comparing JPS errors between the operated and non-operated knees in the ACLR group. Known-group validity was evaluated by comparing JPS errors between the operated knees in the ACLR group and the asymptomatic non-dominant knees of healthy controls. RESULTS: Mean AE, CE and VE for all tests were 4.1°, - 2.3° and 3.6° for the operated knees in the ACLR group, 5.5°, - 2.6° and 3.3° for the non-operated knees in the ACLR group and 4.6°, - 2.6° and 3.3° for the non-dominant knees in the control group, respectively, regardless of the test direction and target angle. The operated knees in the ACLR group did not show significantly greater JPS errors compared to the contralateral knees in the ACLR group and to the non-dominant knees in the control group (p ≥ 0.05). On the other hand, the non-operated knees showed significantly greater AE for the 0°-60° flexion test (p = 0.025) and CE for the 0°-30° flexion test (p = 0.024) than the operated knees in the ACLR group. JPS errors did not significantly differ in the operated knees in the ACLR group based on the direction of movement and the target angle. However, the errors were significantly higher when the knee was moved through a greater range compared to that of a lesser range between the starting and target angles. CONCLUSION: The ACLR knees did not show greater passive JPS errors than the contralateral or control knees. The direction of movement and target angle did not influence the JPS acuity after ACLR. However, higher JPS errors were evident when the knee was moved through a greater range compared to a lesser range of motion. Further studies investigating the psychometric properties of standardized JPS tests following ACLR are warranted.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Knee Joint , Male , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Knee Joint/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , ProprioceptionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge about how the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and capsuloligamentous structures on the medial side of the knee act to control anteromedial rotatory knee instability. PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of the medial retinaculum, capsular structures (anteromedial capsule, deep medial collateral ligament [MCL], and posterior oblique ligament), and different fiber regions of the superficial MCL to restraining knee laxity, including anteromedial rotatory instability. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system in a position-controlled mode. Loads of 10 N·m valgus rotation, 5 N·m tibial external rotation, 5 N·m tibial internal rotation, and 134 N anterior tibial translation in 5 N·m external rotation were applied at different flexion angles. The motion of the intact knee at 0° to 120° of flexion was replicated after sequential excision of the sartorial fascia; anteromedial retinaculum; anteromedial capsule; anterior, middle, and posterior fibers of the superficial MCL; the deep MCL; the posterior oblique ligament; and the ACL. The reduction in force/torque indicated the contribution of each resected structure to resisting laxity. A repeated-measures analysis of variance with a post hoc Bonferroni test was used to analyze the relative force and torque changes from the intact state. RESULTS: The superficial MCL was the most important restraint to valgus rotation from 0° to 120° and provided the largest contribution to resisting external rotation between 30° and 120° of knee flexion, gradually increasing from 25.2% ± 7.4% at 30° to 36.9% ± 15.4% at 90°. The posterior oblique ligament contributed significantly to resisting valgus rotation only in extension (17.2% ± 12.1%) but was the major restraint to internal rotation at 0° (46.7% ± 13.1%) and 30° (30.4% ± 17.7%) of flexion. The sartorial fascia and anteromedial retinaculum resisted ER at all knee flexion angles (P < .05) and was the single most important restraint in the extended knee (19.5% ± 11%). The capsular structures (anteromedial capsule and deep MCL) had a combined contribution of 20% ± 11.5% at 0° and 23.4% ± 10.5% at 120° of knee flexion but were less important from 30° to 90°. The ACL was the primary restraint to anterior tibial translation in external rotation between 0° and 60° of flexion (50.2% ± 16.9% at 30°), but the superficial MCL was more important at 90° to 120° of knee flexion (36.8% ± 16.4% at 90°). The anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the superficial MCL contributed differently to the simulated laxity tests. The anterior fibers were the most important part of the superficial MCL in resisting external rotation and combined anterior tibial translation in external rotation. CONCLUSION: The superficial MCL not only was the primary restraint to valgus rotation throughout the range of knee flexion but also importantly contributed to resisting anterior tibial translation in external rotation, particularly in deeper flexion in the cadaveric model. The anterior fibers of the superficial MCL are the most important superficial MCL fibers in resisting anterior tibial translation in external rotation. This study suggests that a medial reconstruction that reproduces the function of the posterior MCL fibers and posterior oblique ligament may not best control anteromedial rotatory instability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on these data, there is a need for an individualized medial reconstruction to address different types of medial injury patterns and instabilities.