Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 10.275
Filter
1.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 72(3): 165-166, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38565161
5.
J Vet Dent ; 41(3): 253-257, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489783
6.
Nature ; 628(8007): 244-245, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538895
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4385, 2024 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388672

ABSTRACT

A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey research was conducted to estimate honorary authorship prevalence in health sciences. We searched PubMed, Lens.org, and Dimensions.ai. until January 5 2023. Methodological quality was assessed and quantitative syntheses were conducted. Nineteen surveys were included and rated as having low methodological quality. We found a pooled prevalence of 26% [95% CI 21-31] (6 surveys, 2758 respondents) of researchers that perceived co-author(s) as honorary on the publication at issue (when they were not referred to any authorship criteria). That prevalence was 18% [95% CI 15-21] (11 surveys, 4272 respondents) when researchers were referred to Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria, and 51% [95% CI 47-56] (15 surveys, 5111 respondents) when researchers were asked to declare their co-author(s) contributions on the publication at issue (and these were then compared to ICMJE criteria). 10% of researchers [95% CI 9-12] (11 surveys, 3,663 respondents) reported being approached by others to include honorary author(s) on the publication at issue and 16% [95% CI 13-18] (2 surveys, 823 respondents) admitted adding (an) honorary author(s). Survey research consistently indicates that honorary authorship in the health sciences is highly prevalent, however the quality of the surveys' methods and reporting needs improvement.


Subject(s)
Publishing , Radiology , Editorial Policies , Authorship , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
10.
J Exp Anal Behav ; 121(2): 147-150, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384161

Subject(s)
Editorial Policies
11.
J Trauma Stress ; 37(2): 203-204, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351369
12.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS ; 19(2): v, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314603
14.
Clin Podiatr Med Surg ; 41(2): 359-366, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388132

ABSTRACT

The peer review system has become the standard by which scientific articles are refereed. Unfortunately, even from its beginnings in the mid-1800s it has been fraught with difficulties. Potential reviewers are volunteers who may be inundated with requests to review yet these reviews take considerable time and effort. There is little motivation to complete a review causing significant delays in the publication process. There may be biases unintentionally built into the system between reviewers, authors, editors, and journals. Attempts to overcome these biases by various blinding schemes have been met with limited success. Finally, the recent advent of Artificial Intelligence has the potential to completely upend the system, for good or bad.


Subject(s)
Editorial Policies , Peer Review, Research , Humans , Artificial Intelligence
20.
Arch. prev. riesgos labor. (Ed. impr.) ; 27(1): 19-27, 18 ene. 2024. tab, graf, ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-229460

ABSTRACT

Un año más, mediante esta nota editorial, damos cuenta de los principales avan-ces de nuestra revista y las estadísticas editoriales.En cuanto a las estadísticas editoriales, que se detallan en los apartados poste-riores, podemos afirmar que son las de una revista consolidada: flujo nutrido y constante de trabajos recibidos/publicados, tasas de aceptación y rechazo pro-porcionadas, tiempos de gestión razonables y diversidad en las autorías.El logro más destacable del 2023 fue superar con éxito el proceso de evaluación de la Octava edición de Evaluación de la calidad editorial y científica de las revistas científicas españolas, comúnmente conocido como ‘Sello FECYT’.El Sello de Calidad FECYT (Figura 1) identifica a aquellas publicaciones científicas que cumplen unos requisitos de profesionalización internacionalmente reconoci-dos. Gracias a este distintivo, muchas revistas científicas se han posicionado de manera importante en el ámbito nacional e internacional Este reconocimiento lo otorga la FECYT por un periodo de un año desde la resolu-ción definitiva, y la evaluación para su renovación se realizará de oficio por parte de la Fundación una vez finalizado dicho periodo (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Periodicals as Topic , Editorial Policies , Quality Control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...