Where in the world: Mapping medical student learning using the Social and Structural Determinants of Health Curriculum Assessment Tool (SSDH CAT).

INTRODUCTION: Addressing the Social and Structural Determinants of Health (SSDH) is a primary strategy for attaining health equity. Teaching and learning about SSDH has increased across medical schools throughout the world; however, the published literature describing these efforts continues to be limited and many unknowns persist including what should be taught and by whom, what teaching methods and settings should be used, and how medical learners should be assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on published studies, input from experts in the field, and elements from the framework developed by the National Academy of Medicine, we created a universal Social and Structural Determinants of Health Curriculum Assessment Tool (SSDH CAT) to assist medical educators to assess existing SSDH curricular content, ascertain critical gaps, and categorize educational methods, delivery, and assessment techniques and tools that could help inform curricular enhancements to advance the goal of training a health care workforce focused on taking action to achieve health equity. To test the usefulness of the tool, we applied the SSDH CAT to map SSDH-related curriculum at a US-based medical school. RESULTS: By applying the SSDH CAT to our undergraduate medical school curriculum, we recognized that our SSDH curriculum relied too heavily on lectures, emphasized knowledge without sufficient skill building, and lacked objective assessment measures. As a result of our curricular review, we added more skill-based activities such as using evidence-based tools for screening patients for social needs, and created and implemented a universal, longitudinal, experiential community health curriculum. DISCUSSION: We created a universal SSDH CAT and applied it to assess and improve our medical school's SSDH curriculum. The SSDH CAT provides a starting point for other medical schools to assess their SSDH content as a strategy to improve teaching and learning about health equity, and to inspire students to act on the SSDH.

Clinical experience can compensate for inferior academic achievements in an undergraduate objective structured clinical examination.

BACKGROUND: Practical and non-cognitive skills are essential to medical professions; yet, success in medical studies is primarily assessed with cognitive criteria. We show that practical exams can benefit students who have only average high school final grades, but working experience in medical professions. METHODS: With a cross-sectional study, we compare the performance of undergraduate medical students with working experience in adjacent health-care professions (and below-average school leaving-grades) with students who entered medical school directly based on their excellent school records in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). For a sample of more than 1,200 students, we use information on OSCE scores in medical and practical skills, doctor-patient communication/interaction, performance in MC-exams, and core sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Waiting list students outperformed their classmates in the demonstration of practical skills. Students admitted via their excellent school grades scored best overall. This difference vanishes once we control for school-leaving grade and age, the two main factors separating the analysed groups. Students from the waiting list have a significantly smaller overall chance to reach excellent grades in the first two years of study. CONCLUSIONS: Students who gathered experiences in health-care professions before enrolling at medical school can benefit from an expanded role of practical elements in medical studies. Student selection instruments should take these different starting positions and qualities of applicants into account, for example with a quota for the professionally experienced.

Flipped classroom applied to Neurosurgery in undergraduate medical education.

PURPOSE: To compare the academic achievement obtained in Neurosurgery in a class of undergraduate students according to the pedagogical methodology employed: flipped classroom (FC) versus traditional lecture. Students' satisfaction with the FC model is also analyzed. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was designed. The traditional lecture was the pedagogical method employed in teaching units (TUs) 1, 2, and 3 (61, 60, and 66 enrolled students, respectively), whereas TU 4 (69 enrolled students) used the FC methodology. RESULTS: The dropout rate was lower, whereas the academic achievement and the rate of correct answers were higher in TU 4 compared to the rest of the TUs, but these results were not statistically significant. However, the mean score obtained in Neurosurgery was significantly higher in TU 4 compared to the rest of the TUs (p = 0.042). Active learning activities based on clinical cases were positively emphasized. The main weakness was with the time consumed for video-recorded lecture viewing. CONCLUSIONS: The FC approach showed better academic results than traditional lectures when comparing students in the same Medical School during the same academic year undergoing the same exam. The students rated the FC approach positively, considering it stimulating and useful for learning.

Using standardized patients for undergraduate clinical skills training in an introductory course to psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the value and acceptance of Standardized or Simulated Patients (SPs) for training clinically inexperienced undergraduate medical students in psychiatric history taking, psychopathological assessment, and communication with psychiatric patients. METHODS: As part of a newly developed introductory course to psychiatry, pairs of 3rd year medical students conducted psychiatric assessments of SPs, including history and psychopathological state, under the supervision of a clinical lecturer. Prior to the assessment, students attended introductory lectures to communication in psychiatry and psychopathology but were clinically inexperienced. After the interview, the students' summary of their findings was discussed with other students and the lecturer. Students, lecturers, and actors were invited to a survey after the course. Questions for the students included self-reports about perceived learning success and authenticity of the interviews. RESULTS: 41 students, 6 actors and 8 lecturers completed the survey (response rates of 48%, 50%, and 100%, respectively). The survey results indicated that, despite their lack of clinical experience, students learned how to conduct a psychiatric interview, communicate in a non-judgmental and empathetic manner, take a psychiatric history and perform a psychopathological examination. SPs were perceived as authentic. The survey results suggested that this setting allowed for an enjoyable, non-distressful and motivating learning experience within a restricted time frame of just two afternoons. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that the SP approach presented is useful for teaching clinical skills in psychiatry to students with limited previous clinical experience and knowledge of psychiatry. We argue that SPs can be used to teach practical psychiatric skills already during an early phase of the curriculum. Limitations of our study include a limited sample size, a temporal gap between the course and the survey, reliance on self-reports, and lack of comparison to alternative interventions.

Ensuring competence of essential skills: clinical examination for final year medical students.

OBJECTIVE: To ensure competence of essential skills of final year medical students in clinical examination by identifying essential skills and by revisiting and practising them before the examination. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Aga Khan University, Karachi, from February to November, 2019, and comprised final year medical students and internal examiners from various academic disciplines. An overview of the organisational context, exam structure and process was noted. RESULTS: There were 96 medical students. The four key areas highlighted were development of the list of essential skills across five years of undergraduate medical curriculum with consensus from all disciplines, student motivation for attendance in practice sessions, unfamiliarity of examiners with the assessment tool, and the need for capacity-building. The key areas were based on the feedback received from all the stakeholders, and post-hoc analysis. Conclusion: This form of assessment would enable a thorough analysis of the preparedness of the students to function as independent physicians as undifferentiated doctor at the start of their careers as interns, and improve the quality of subsequent exams based on feedback and suggestions of faculty and students.

Chatbot-based serious games: A useful tool for training medical students? A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Chatbots, conversational agents that walk medical students (MS) though a clinical case, are serious games that seem to be appreciated by MS. Their impact on MS's performance in exams however was not yet evaluated. Chatprogress is a chatbot-based game developed at Paris Descartes University. It contains 8 pulmonology cases with step-by-step answers delivered with pedagogical comments. The CHATPROGRESS study aimed to evaluate the impact of Chatprogress on students' success rate in their end-term exams. METHODS: We conducted a post-test randomized controlled trial held on all fourth-year MS at Paris Descartes University. All MS were asked to follow the University's regular lectures, and half of them were randomly given access to Chatprogress. At the end of the term, medical students were evaluated on pulmonology, cardiology and critical care medicine. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary aim was to evaluate an increase in scores in the pulmonology sub-test for students who had access to Chatprogress, compared to those who didn't. Secondary aims were to evaluate an increase in scores in the overall test (Pulmonology, Cardiology and Critical care medicine test (PCC)) and to evaluate the correlation between access to Chatprogress and overall test score. Finally, students' satisfaction was assessed using a survey. RESULTS: From 10/2018 to 06/2019, 171 students had access to Chatprogress (the Gamers) and among them, 104 ended up using it (the Users). Gamers and Users were compared to 255 Controls with no access to Chatprogress. Differences in scores on the pulmonology sub-test over the academic year were significantly higher among Gamers and Users vs Controls (mean score: 12.7/20 vs 12.0/20, p = 0.0104 and mean score: 12.7/20 vs 12.0/20, p = 0.0365 respectively). This significant difference was present as well in the overall PCC test scores: (mean score: 12.5/20 vs 12.1/20, p = 0.0285 and 12.6/20 vs 12.1/20, p = 0.0355 respectively). Although no significant correlation was found between the pulmonology sub-test's scores and MS's assiduity parameters (number of finished games among the 8 proposed to Users and number of times a User finished a game), there was a trend to a better correlation when users were evaluated on a subject covered by Chatprogress. MS were also found to be fans of this teaching tool, asking for more pedagogical comments even when they got the questions right. CONCLUSION: This randomised controlled trial is the first to demonstrate a significant improvement in students' results (in both the pulmonology subtest and the overall PCC exam) when they had access to Chatbots, and even more so when they actually used it.

Termbot: A Chatbot-Based Crossword Game for Gamified Medical Terminology Learning.

Medical terminology can be challenging for healthcare students due to its unfamiliar and lengthy terms. Traditional methods such as flashcards and memorization can be ineffective and require significant effort. To address this, an online chatbot-based learning model called Termbot was designed to provide an engaging and convenient method for enhancing medical terminology learning. Termbot, accessible through the LINE platform, offers crossword puzzles that turn boring medical terms into a fun learning experience. An experimental study was conducted, which showed that students who trained with Termbot made significant progress in learning medical terms, demonstrating the potential of chatbots to improve learning outcomes. Termbot's gamified approach to learning can also be applied to other fields, making it a useful tool for students to learn medical terminology conveniently and enjoyably.

Exploring the Challenges of Frailty in Medical Education.

Frailty is common, and medical students and doctors across all specialties will look after patients with frailty. The General Medical Council requires UK medical schools to teach and assess on frailty, and national geriatric societies across the globe include frailty in their recommended undergraduate curricula. However, frailty in medical education is challenging; there is uncertainty around what frailty is in medical education, including how and when to teach it; controversies in mapping teaching and assessments to recommended curricula; patients with frailty can be challenging to include in teaching and assessments due to functional, sensory, and/or cognitive impairments; an individual with frailty is likely to present atypically, with less predictable recovery, introducing complexities into clinical reasoning that can be challenging for students; the term frailty is often negatively perceived, used colloquially and avoided in educational interactions. This commentary discusses these challenges around frailty in undergraduate medical education and serves to provoke discussion about why frailty is so challenging to teach and learn about, including recommendations for how frailty education could be improved.

Integration of respiratory physiology and clinical reasoning in the early years of a medical curriculum: engaging with students in a large classroom setting.

Medical graduates are expected to apply scientific principles and explain the processes underlying common and important diseases. Evidence shows that integrated medical curricula, which deliver biomedical science within the context of clinical cases, facilitate student learning in preparation for practice. However, research has also shown that the student's perception of their knowledge can be lower in integrated compared to traditional courses. Thus the development of teaching methods to support both integrated learning and build student confidence in clinical reasoning is a priority. In this study, we describe the use of an audience response system to support active learning in large classes. Sessions, delivered by medical faculty from both academic and clinical backgrounds, were designed to build on the knowledge of the respiratory system in both health and disease through the interpretation of clinical cases. Results showed that student engagement was high throughout the session and students strongly agreed that the application of knowledge to real-life cases was a better way to understand clinical reasoning. Qualitative free text comments revealed that students liked the link between theory and practice and the active, integrated method of learning. In summary, this study describes a relatively simple but highly effective way of delivering integrated medical science teaching, in this case respiratory medicine, to improve student confidence in clinical reasoning. This educational approach was applied within the early years of the curriculum in preparation for teaching within a hospital setting, but the format could be applied across many different settings.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The development of teaching methods that support integrated learning and build student confidence is a priority. An audience response system was used to engage early year medical students in large classes in preparation for teaching within a hospital setting. Results showed high levels of student engagement and a greater appreciation for the link between theory and practice. This study describes a simple, active, and integrated method of learning that improves student confidence in clinical reasoning.

Final-year information on didactic and organizational issues for students and supervising physicians - project report on the development and implementation of the cross-site website PJ-input.

Objective: Final-year training is becoming increasingly important in medical studies and requires a high degree of personal responsibility from students. It is the task of supervising physicians to make informal learning opportunities available to students when working with and on patients and to gradually transfer responsibility to them. Both students and physicians have a great need for information regarding the contextual conditions and didactic realization of this transfer of responsibility. Up to now, the faculties have only provided information and support in a sporadic manner and with little standardization. With MERLIN, the joint project undertaken by the Competence Network for Teaching Medicine in Baden-Württemberg, a platform for the final year was developed and released on the web. The aim was to bundle information in order to support students and supervising physicians in their teaching-learning process and to improve the quality of teaching in the final year. Project description: The development process of this platform took place in several steps across all faculties. Content and materials were compiled and structured based on a needs assessment. The first draft was evaluated by means of a simulation by students and then revised. A professional internet agency was involved for the technical implementation. The newly designed website PJ-input ("PJ" being the abbreviation for "Praktisches Jahr", the final year) contains areas for students and supervising physicians, as well as faculty-specific and general information about the final year. Faculty-specific content can be entered directly by the respective staff via an input mask and updated at any time. The provision of didactic materials can support competency-oriented teaching and learning in the final year. Here, for example, the concept of the Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) was taken up, which gives students and supervising physicians orientation for the gradual assumption or transfer of responsibility. The platform was launched in spring 2021. Usage behavior is continuously recorded via the web application. Results and conclusion: The evaluation results show that the website is visited often and perceived as supportive. Increasing usage figures and the high frequency of use by students in the sections "im PJ" (during the final year) and "nach dem PJ" (after the final year) for the faculties involved in the MERLIN project confirm the target group-oriented design and use. The site should be promoted even more to pre-final-year students, as well as across state borders and to the target group of faculties. It is expected that nationwide faculty participation will make a significant contribution to the competency-based shift in teaching and the standardization of training during the final year of study under the new licensing regulations.

Radical reform of the undergraduate medical education program in a developing country: the Egyptian experience.

Medical educators are in a continuous quest to close the gap between the needs of medical practice and the rising expectations of the communities in their countries. During the past two decades, competency-based medical education has been evolving as an appealing strategy to close this gap. In 2017, the Egyptian medical education authorities mandated all medical schools to change their curricula to comply with revised national academic reference standards, which changed from outcome-based to competency-based. In parallel, they also changed the timeline of all medical programs for six years of studentship and one-year internship to five years and two years, respectively. This substantial reform involved the assessment of the existing situation, an awareness campaign for the proposed changes and an extensive national faculty development program. Monitoring the implementation of this substantial reform was performed through surveys, field visits and meetings with students, teaching staff and program directors. In addition to the expected challenges, the COVID-19-associated restrictions presented a significant further challenge during the implementation of this reform. This article presents the rationale for and steps of this reform, the challenges faced and how they were addressed.

Learning strategy impacts medical diagnostic reasoning in early learners.

Relating learned information to similar yet new scenarios, transfer of learning, is a key characteristic of expert reasoning in many fields including medicine. Psychological research indicates that transfer of learning is enhanced via active retrieval strategies. For diagnostic reasoning, this finding suggests that actively retrieving diagnostic information about patient cases could improve the ability to engage in transfer of learning to later diagnostic decisions. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment in which two groups of undergraduate student participants learned symptom lists of simplified psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., Schizophrenia; Mania). Next, one group received written patient cases and actively retrieved the cases from memory and the other group read these written cases twice, engaging in a passive rehearsal learning strategy. Both groups then diagnosed test cases that had two equally valid diagnoses-one supported by "familiar" symptoms described in learned patient cases, and one by novel symptom descriptions. While all participants were more likely to assign higher diagnostic probability to those supported by the familiar symptoms, this effect was significantly larger for participants that engaged in active retrieval compared to passive rehearsal. There were also significant differences in performance across the given diagnoses, potentially due to differences in established knowledge of the disorders. To test this prediction, Experiment 2 compared performance on the described experiment between a participant group that received the standard diagnostic labels to a group that received fictional diagnostic labels, nonsense words designed to remove prior knowledge with each diagnosis. As predicted, there was no effect of diagnosis on task performance for the fictional label group. These results provide new insight on the impact of learning strategy and prior knowledge in fostering transfer of learning, potentially contributing to expert development in medicine.

Análisis de las características de la docencia de pregrado de Dermatología en las universidades españolas. ¿Los contenidos teóricos se aproximan a la casuística de los médicos de Atención Primaria y dermatólogos generales? / Analysis of Undergraduate Dermatology Syllabi at Spanish Universities: Does the Weight of Theoretical Content Match the Skin Conditions Seen in Primary Care and General Dermatology Practices?

Introducción La docencia de pregrado de Dermatología varía entre las casi 50 facultades de Medicina españolas. El presente estudio pretende describir las características de las asignaturas y analizar si la carga lectiva de los temarios se ajusta a la casuística de los médicos de Atención Primaria y dermatólogos generales del sistema de salud español. Material y método Estudio de corte transversal realizado en 2021-2022. Se recabaron datos de universidades a partir de las guías docentes. Se comparó la carga docente de una universidad pública y otra privada con la carga asistencial de médicos de familia y dermatólogos a partir de estudios previos. Resultados La mayor parte de las facultades imparten Dermatología como asignatura semestral, con una mediana de 4,5 créditos, con una media de 24 temas teóricos y 9 temas en seminarios y talleres. Existe una clara divergencia entre la carga docente relativa de los temas teóricos y la carga asistencial por enfermedades cutáneas en Atención Primaria y Dermatología general. Discusión La carga lectiva infrarrepresenta en gran medida las enfermedades cutáneas más comúnmente consultadas en Atención Primaria y Dermatología general. Resulta oportuno reevaluar qué contenidos deben adquirir o recuperar una mayor representación en la carga docente de la asignatura de Dermatología. Con base en los resultados obtenidos, consideramos óptimo incrementar, idealmente mediante metodologías de apoyo a la docencia teórica, la carga docente referida a cuadros de dermatitis, dermatosis infecciosas, acné, psoriasis, urticaria y, finalmente, las neoplasias benignas y su diagnóstico diferencial con las malignas (AU)

Introduction Undergraduate dermatology courses vary in the nearly 50 Spanish medical faculties that teach the subject. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of these courses and to analyze whether the weight assigned to dermatology topics reflect the caseloads of primary care physicians and general dermatologists in the Spanish national health system. Material and method Cross-sectional study of syllabi used in Spanish medical faculties during the 2021-2022 academic year. We determined the number of teaching hours in public and private university curricula and compared the weight of dermatology topics covered to the dermatology caseloads of primary care physicians and general dermatologists as reported in published studies. Results Most medical faculties taught dermatology for one semester. The median number of credits offered was 4.5. On average, lectures covered 24 theoretical topics, and seminars and workshops covered 9 topics. We identified a clear disparity between the percentage of time devoted to dermatology topics in course lectures and the skin conditions usually managed in primary care and general dermatology practices. Discussion The skin diseases most commonly treated by primary care physicians and general dermatologists are underrepresented in the curricula of Spanish medical faculties. The topics that should be given more weight in syllabi, or recovered for inclusion in dermatology courses, should be re-examined. Our findings show that the topics that ideally should be emphasized more are types of dermatitis, infectious skin diseases, acne, psoriasis, rashes, and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms. There should be additional support for the theoretical teaching of these topics (AU)

[Translated article] Analysis of Undergraduate Dermatology Syllabi at Spanish Universities: Does the Weight of Theoretical Content Match the Skin Conditions Seen in Primary Care and General Dermatology Practices? / Análisis de las características de la docencia de pregrado de Dermatología en las universidades españolas. ¿Los contenidos teóricos se aproximan a la casuística de los médicos de Atención Primaria y dermatólogos generales?

Introduction Undergraduate dermatology courses vary in the nearly 50 Spanish medical faculties that teach the subject. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of these courses and to analyze whether the weight assigned to dermatology topics reflect the caseloads of primary care physicians and general dermatologists in the Spanish national health system. Material and method Cross-sectional study of syllabi used in Spanish medical faculties during the 2021-2022 academic year. We determined the number of teaching hours in public and private university curricula and compared the weight of dermatology topics covered to the dermatology caseloads of primary care physicians and general dermatologists as reported in published studies. Results Most medical faculties taught dermatology for one semester. The median number of credits offered was 4.5. On average, lectures covered 24 theoretical topics, and seminars and workshops covered 9 topics. We identified a clear disparity between the percentage of time devoted to dermatology topics in course lectures and the skin conditions usually managed in primary care and general dermatology practices. Discussion The skin diseases most commonly treated by primary care physicians and general dermatologists are underrepresented in the curricula of Spanish medical faculties. The topics that should be given more weight in syllabi, or recovered for inclusion in dermatology courses, should be re-examined. Our findings show that the topics that ideally should be emphasized more are types of dermatitis, infectious skin diseases, acne, psoriasis, rashes, and the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms. There should be additional support for the theoretical teaching of these topics (AU)

Introducción La docencia de pregrado de Dermatología varía entre las casi 50 facultades de Medicina españolas. El presente estudio pretende describir las características de las asignaturas y analizar si la carga lectiva de los temarios se ajusta a la casuística de los médicos de Atención Primaria y dermatólogos generales del sistema de salud español. Material y método Estudio de corte transversal realizado en 2021-2022. Se recabaron datos de universidades a partir de las guías docentes. Se comparó la carga docente de una universidad pública y otra privada con la carga asistencial de médicos de familia y dermatólogos a partir de estudios previos. Resultados La mayor parte de las facultades imparten Dermatología como asignatura semestral, con una mediana de 4,5 créditos, con una media de 24 temas teóricos y 9 temas en seminarios y talleres. Existe una clara divergencia entre la carga docente relativa de los temas teóricos y la carga asistencial por enfermedades cutáneas en Atención Primaria y Dermatología general. Discusión La carga lectiva infrarrepresenta en gran medida las enfermedades cutáneas más comúnmente consultadas en Atención Primaria y Dermatología general. Resulta oportuno reevaluar qué contenidos deben adquirir o recuperar una mayor representación en la carga docente de la asignatura de Dermatología. Con base en los resultados obtenidos, consideramos óptimo incrementar, idealmente mediante metodologías de apoyo a la docencia teórica, la carga docente referida a cuadros de dermatitis, dermatosis infecciosas, acné, psoriasis, urticaria y, finalmente, las neoplasias benignas y su diagnóstico diferencial con las malignas (AU)

"You're actually part of the team": a qualitative study of a novel transitional role from medical student to doctor.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing transitions from final year of medical school and into first post graduate year has important implications for students, patients and the health care system. Student experiences during novel transitional roles can provide insights into potential opportunities for final year curricula. We explored the experiences of medical students in a novel transitional role and their ability to continue learning whilst working as part of a medical team. METHODS: Novel transitional role for final year medical students were created in partnership by medical schools and state health departments in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for a medical surge workforce. Final year medical students from an undergraduate entry medical school were employed as Assistants in Medicine (AiMs) in urban and regional hospitals. A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews at two time points was used to obtain experiences of the role from 26 AiMs. Transcripts were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis with Activity theory as a conceptual lens. RESULTS: This unique role was defined by the objective of supporting the hospital team. Experiential learning opportunities in patient management were optimized when AiMs had opportunities to contribute meaningfully. Team structure and access to the key instrument, the electronic medical record, enabled participants to contribute meaningfully, whilst contractual arrangements and payments formalized the obligations to contribute. CONCLUSIONS: The experiential nature of the role was facilitated by organizational factors. Structuring teams to involve a dedicated medical assistant position with specific duties and access to the electronic medical record sufficient to complete duties are key to successful transitional roles. Both should be considered when designing transitional roles as placements for final year medical students.

Use of Ripple Effects Mapping to assess student-perceived benefits of undergraduate research and learning objective attainment with Irish nutrition students.

Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) is a qualitative data analysis approach that combines mind mapping with inductive analysis to condense data obtained from group interviews. One benefit of REM is the ability to identify unintended outcomes, or "ripples," of the intervention of interest. Ripples are visually represented by a mind map created during the REM session. Mind maps connect related concepts, typically with the main concept in the center of the map and supporting ideas radiating from a central node. This project applied REM to undergraduate course evaluation. The purpose of this study was threefold: to use REM to identify undergraduate student-perceived benefits of research projects, to assess whether REM could be used to confirm achievement of course learning objectives, and to compare the themes identified from the mind mapping component of REM to those identified by inductive analysis. Mind maps were generated with Xmind (Xmind Ltd., Hong Kong) during online sessions by two groups of students, those who completed a "mandatory" research project (n = 11) and those who chose to participate in an additional "optional" research project (n = 9). There was considerable overlap in identified themes between mind mapping and inductive analysis, with skills, relationships, career direction, and unexpected benefits identified by both techniques. Mind mapping identified several additional themes. Findings from both approaches were compared to course learning objectives, and both confirmed that all objectives were met. In situations where time is a limiting factor, mind mapping could be superior to the complete REM approach for course learning objective assessments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study used Ripple Effects Mapping (REM) to identify undergraduate student-perceived benefits of research projects, to assess whether REM could confirm achievement of course learning objectives for a research project-based course, and to compare themes identified from the mind mapping component of REM to those identified by inductive analysis. Mind mapping confirmed achievement of course objectives and may be a better choice compared to inductive reasoning when time is limited.

Master clinical teachers and personalised learning.

Clinical history taking and physical examination are two of the most important competencies of physicians. In addition to informing diagnoses, these activities build rapport and establish relationships between caregivers and patients. Despite this, emphasis on the assessment of bedside clinical skills is declining. To prepare our students for clinical work, we began a clinical competency, personalised teaching programme in which students perform a history and physical examination in front of a master clinical teacher (MCT) approximately every 2 weeks throughout their core clerkship year. The MCT works with the student in a clinical encounter, providing personalised bedside instruction on all features of being a clinician including bedside manner, history-taking skills, physical examination skills, and clinical reasoning. The MCT then provides an assessment of student's competency development and gives feedback to the student about what they do well and where they have opportunities for growth. Assessment data are collected and tracked longitudinally across the clerkship phase to ensure that each student is progressing developmentally. With over 6000 observations of student performance, we are able to discern competency development and growth over time. We can identify if a student is not improving as expected during their clerkship phase and intervene by providing extra practice and training. This core clerkship teaching programme has been well received by both students and instructors and has led us to pilot this approach during the post-clerkship phase of our medical training.

Learning dermatology in medical school: analysis of dermatology topics tested in popular question banks.

Given the lack of formal dermatology education in medical schools, dermatology principles covered in board exam preparatory resources remain the only standardized concepts that all medical students across the USA universally learn. The primary objective of this study was to quantify the dermatology topics represented in UWorld and AMBOSS Step 1 and Step 2CK question banks. Our study found that 49% of the 655 questions on dermatology assessed the top 10 most prevalent skin diseases encountered in clinical practice with a variety of rare conditions also tested. Step 2CK question banks had a higher proportion of questions that assessed management of dermatological conditions. Furthermore, there was a large variability in the proportion of questions that included images of the condition. This study highlights the need and opportunity for standardization of dermatology teaching in medical school curricula to optimally prepare graduating physicians for future practice.

Beyond Skin Deep: case-based online modules to teach multidisciplinary care in dermatology among clerkship students.

BACKGROUND: Canadian medical schools offer limited clinical dermatology training. In addition, there is a lack of educational resources that are designed specifically for clerkship students that focus on the multidisciplinary nature of dermatology. OBJECTIVES: After developing case-based educational resources to address the lack of clinical exposure and learning of multidisciplinary care in dermatology, this study aimed to evaluate the educational intervention and gather feedback for future module development. METHODS: Ten online interactive dermatology case-based modules involving 14 other disciplines were created. Medical students (n = 89) from two Canadian schools were surveyed regarding perceptions of the existing dermatology curriculum. Among 89 students, 46 voluntarily completed the modules, and a survey (a five-point Likert scale ratings) including narrative feedback was provided to determine an improvement in dermatology knowledge and understanding of multidisciplinary care. RESULTS: Among 89 surveyed students, only 17.1% agreed that their pre-clerkship dermatology education was sufficient and 10.2% felt comfortable managing patients with skin conditions in a clinical setting. Among 46 students, 95.7% of students agreed that the modules fit their learning style (4.17 ± 0.73 on Likert scale) with positive narrative feedback. 91.3% agreed or strongly agreed that the modules enhanced their dermatology knowledge (4.26 ± 0.61). 79.6% of students agreed that the modules helped with understanding the multidisciplinary nature of dermatological cases (3.98 ± 0.81). Student comfort to manage skin conditions increased 7.7 times from 10.2% to 78.3% post-module. CONCLUSIONS: Clerkship students had limited knowledge of dermatologic conditions; the case-based modules were able to successfully address these deficits and assist students in understanding the multidisciplinary nature of dermatology.