ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether genotype-guided selection of oral antiplatelet drugs using a clinical decision support (CDS) algorithm reduces the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) among Caribbean Hispanic patients, after 6 months. DESIGN: An open-label, multicentre, non-randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Eight secondary and tertiary care hospitals (public and private) in Puerto Rico. PARTICIPANTS: 300 Caribbean Hispanic patients on clopidogrel, both genders, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes, stable ischaemic heart disease and documented extracardiac vascular diseases. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were separated into standard-of-care (SoC) and genotype-guided (pharmacogenetic (PGx)-CDS) groups (150 each) and stratified by risk scores. Risk scores were calculated based on a previously developed CDS risk prediction algorithm designed to make actionable treatment recommendations for each patient. Individual platelet function, genotypes, clinical and demographic data were included. Ticagrelor was recommended for patients with a high-risk score ≥2 in the PGx-CDS group only, the rest were kept or de-escalated to clopidogrel. The intervention took place within 3-5 days after PCI. Adherence medication score was also measured. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The occurrence rate of MACCEs (primary) and bleeding episodes (secondary). Statistical associations between patient time free of events and predictor variables (ie, treatment groups, risk scores) were tested using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional-hazards regression models. RESULTS: The genotype-guided group had a clinically lower but not significantly different risk of MACCEs compared with the SoC group (8.7% vs 10.7%, p=0.56; HR=0.56). Among high-risk score patients, genotype-driven guidance of antiplatelet therapy showed superiority over SoC in reducing MACCE incidence 6 months postcoronary stenting (adjusted HR=0.104; p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefit of implementing our PGx-CDS algorithm to significantly reduce the incidence rate of MACCEs in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanic patients on clopidogrel was observed exclusively among high-risk patients, with apparently no evident effect in other patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03419325.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Clopidogrel , Hispanic or Latino , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Ticagrelor , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Clopidogrel/therapeutic use , Puerto Rico , Aged , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/genetics , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Genotype , Pharmacogenetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Risk Assessment , Caribbean Region/ethnology , Hemorrhage/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The utilization of genomic information to improve health outcomes is progressively becoming more common in clinical practice. Nonetheless, disparities persist in accessing genetic services among ethnic minorities, individuals with low socioeconomic status, and other vulnerable populations. The Rio Grande Valley (RGV) at the Texas-Mexico border is predominantly Hispanic/Latino with a high poverty rate and very limited access to genetic services. Funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Project GIVE (Genetic Inclusion by Virtual Evaluation) was launched in 2022 to reduce the time to diagnosis and increase provider knowledge of genomics in this region, with the goal of improving pediatric health outcomes. We describe our experience of establishing a virtual pediatric genomic service in this region to expeditiously identify, recruit, and evaluate pediatric patients with undiagnosed diseases. METHODS: We have utilized an innovative electronic health record (EHR) agnostic virtual telehealth and educational platform called Consultagene to receive referrals from healthcare providers in the RGV. Using this portal, genetic services, including virtual evaluation and genome sequencing (GS), are being delivered to children with rare diseases. The study has also integrated effective methods to involve and educate community providers through in-person meetings and Continuing Professional Education (CPE) events. RESULTS: The recruitment efforts have proven highly successful with the utilization of Consultagene in this medically underserved region. The project's ongoing engagement efforts with local healthcare providers have resulted in progressively more referrals to the study over time, thus improving inclusion and access to genomic care in the RGV. Additionally, the curated CPE content has been well received by healthcare providers in the region. CONCLUSIONS: Project GIVE study has allowed advanced genetic evaluation and delivery of GS through the virtual Consultagene portal, effectively circumventing the recognized socioeconomic and logistical barriers to accessing genetic services within this border community.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Telemedicine , Humans , Texas , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Child , Hispanic or Latino , Genetic Services/organization & administration , Genomics , Female , Male , Health Inequities , Electronic Health Records , Medically Underserved Area , Healthcare Disparities , AdolescentABSTRACT
Social Identity Theory proposes that a positive in-group social identification fosters students' academic motivation and psychological well-being. The present study, grounded in Social Identity Theory, investigated the roles of racial/ethnicity identity (REI) in the development of school adjustment among Black and Latinx youth as well as the psychological mechanisms underlying these longitudinal associations. We hypothesized that REI would positively predict the development of academic achievement and emotional symptoms. In addition, we hypothesized that the development of school belonging would mediate the predictive effects of REI on the growth of academic achievement and emotional symptoms. Participants were 475 (n = 182 Black, 48.9% female; 293 Latinx, 47.8% female) students in Grades 7-9. Students self-reported their REI, school belonging, and emotional symptoms. Academic achievement was assessed using standardized achievement test scores. The longitudinal mediation models indicated that REI indirectly predicted the development of academic achievement and emotional symptoms through students' sense of school belonging. Specifically, higher REI embedded achievement and lower REI awareness of racism predicted higher school belonging in Grade 7. Higher Grade 7 school belonging in turn predicted faster academic growth in Grade 7 to Grade 9 as well as lower emotional symptoms in Grade 7. In addition, the three dimensions of REI also directly predicted the growth of academic achievement and emotional symptoms in Grades 7-9. The mediated effects were smaller in size than the direct effects. These findings highlight the importance of fostering positive REI and a strong sense of school belonging in promoting school adjustment among racial/ethnic minoritized, academically at-risk youth.
Subject(s)
Academic Success , Black or African American , Hispanic or Latino , Schools , Social Identification , Students , Humans , Female , Male , Adolescent , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Students/psychology , Longitudinal Studies , Black or African American/psychology , Racism/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective pharmaceutical intervention that prevents HIV infection, but PrEP uptake across the US has been slow among men who have sex with men (MSM), especially among Black/African American (B/AA) and Hispanic /Latino (H/L) MSM. This study investigates the acceptability and essential components of a peer-driven intervention (PDI) for promoting PrEP uptake among MSM, with a specific focus on B/AA and H/L communities. METHODS: We conducted 28 semi-structured, qualitative interviews with MSM in southern New England to explore the components of a PDI, including attitudes, content, and effective communication methods. A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit diverse participants who reflect the communities with the highest burden of HIV infection. RESULTS: Of 28 study participants, the median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 25, 35). The sample comprised B/AA (39%, n = 11) and H/L (50%, n = 14) individuals. Notably, nearly half of the participants (46%) were current PrEP users. We found that many participants were in favor of using a PDI approach for promoting PrEP. Additionally, several participants showed interest in becoming peer educators themselves. They emphasized the need for strong communication skills to effectively teach others about PrEP. Moreover, participants noted that peer education should cover key topics like how PrEP works, how effective it is, and any possible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that effective PDIs, facilitated by well-trained peers knowledgeable about PrEP, could enhance PrEP uptake among MSM, addressing health disparities and potentially reducing HIV transmission in B/AA and H/L communities.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Homosexuality, Male , Peer Group , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Adult , HIV Infections/prevention & control , New England , Interviews as Topic , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) impact about 10% of patients with pediatric cancer. Genetic testing (CPS-GT) has multiple benefits, but few studies have described parent and child knowledge and attitudes regarding CPS-GT decision-making. This study examined parent and patient CPS-GT decision-making knowledge and attitudes. PROCEDURE: English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children with pediatric cancer and patients with pediatric cancer ages 15-18 within 12 months of diagnosis or relapse were eligible to participate. Seventy-five parents and 19 parent-patient dyads (N = 94 parents, 77.7% female, 43.6% Latino/a/Hispanic; 19 patients, 31.6% female) completed surveys measuring CPS-GT-related beliefs. Independent samples t-tests compared parent responses across sociodemographic characteristics and parent-patient responses within dyads. RESULTS: Spanish-speaking parents were significantly more likely than English-speaking parents to believe that CPS-GT not being helpful (p < .001) and possibly causing personal distress (p = .002) were important considerations for deciding whether to obtain CPS-GT. Parents with less than four-year university education, income less than $75,000, or Medicaid (vs. private insurance) were significantly more likely to endorse that CPS-GT not being helpful was an important consideration for deciding whether to obtain CPS-GT (p < .001). Parents felt more strongly than patients that they understood what CPS-GT was (p = .01) and that parents should decide whether patients under 18 should receive CPS-GT (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking parents and parents with lower socioeconomic statuses were more strongly influenced by the potential disadvantages of CPS-GT in CPS-GT decision-making. Parents felt more strongly than patients that parents should make CPS-GT decisions. Future studies should investigate mechanisms behind these differences and how to best support CPS-GT knowledge and decision-making.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Parents , Humans , Female , Male , Adolescent , Parents/psychology , Adult , Child , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Decision Making , Surveys and Questionnaires , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/genetics , Middle Aged , Sociodemographic Factors , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Higher education is widely recognized as a strategy to mitigate food insecurity. However, marginalized and racialized groups, especially Latinos, often do not experience the same economic and health benefits from their educational achievements as non-Latino Whites, highlighting a pattern of diminished returns within these communities. Aims: This study aims to explore the disparities in how educational attainment influences marital status and employment, and subsequently, food insecurity among Latino and non-Latino adults. Methods: Utilizing data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which encompassed 27,648 adults from both Latino and non-Latino backgrounds, this research applied a structural equation model to examine the relationship between educational attainment, ethnicity, and food insecurity. The study specifically focused on the mediating roles of marital status and employment. Results: Findings reveal significant interactions between education and ethnicity affecting marital status and employment, both of which serve as protective factors against food insecurity. These results indicate that higher levels of unemployment and lower marriage rates may disproportionately escalate food insecurity among Latinos, irrespective of educational attainment. Conclusion: The study highlights profound societal and environmental obstacles that prevent Latinos from leveraging educational achievements to improve their marital and employment statuses, and thereby, their food security. Addressing these disparities demands targeted interventions directed at Latino communities to bridge gaps in employment and marriage rates stemming from educational disparities. A holistic strategy that transcends mere access to education is essential to dismantle the societal barriers that undermine the educational dividends for Latino communities.
Subject(s)
Educational Status , Employment , Food Insecurity , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Middle Aged , United States , Family Characteristics , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Family StructureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the past 2 decades, melanoma incidence among Hispanic individuals has risen by 20%. The mortality rate of Hispanic individuals is higher than that for non-Hispanic White individuals. Skin cancer can largely be prevented with regular sun protection, and skin cancer outcomes can be improved through early detection, for example, by skin self-examination. Alarmingly, Hispanic individuals are less aware of the symptoms and harms of skin cancers, tend to have misperceptions regarding the risks and benefits of skin cancer prevention behaviors, and engage in less sun protection behaviors than non-Hispanic White individuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a community-engaged approach and conduct both group and individual interviews among Hispanic individuals and relevant key stakeholders to explore the potential design of a mobile-based skin cancer prevention intervention for Hispanic individuals. METHODS: This study used a qualitative design (focus groups and individual interviews). Participants were recruited from local community organizations' social media, local events, and contact lists (eg, email). Zoom interviews were conducted to examine whether Hispanic individuals would be interested in a mobile-based skin cancer intervention and to explore their preferences and suggestions to inform skin cancer prevention intervention design. RESULTS: Five focus groups (2 in Spanish and 3 in English) among self-identified Hispanic individuals (n=34) and 15 semistructured, in-depth individual interviews among key stakeholders (health care providers and community leaders; eg, dermatologist, nurse practitioner, licensed social worker, and church leader) were conducted. The main themes and subthemes emerging from the group discussions and individual interviews were organized into the following categories: intervention platform, delivery frequency and format, message design, engagement plan, and activities. WhatsApp and Facebook were identified as suitable platforms for the intervention. Messages including short videos, visuals (eg, images and photographs), and simple texts messages were preferred. Recommendations for message design included personalized messages, personal stories and narratives, culturally relevant design (eg, incorporating family values), and community-trusted sources. Potential engagement and retention recommendations were also discussed. Additional details and exemplar quotes of each theme and subtheme are described. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights and directions for the design of a mobile, digital skin cancer intervention to modify Hispanic individuals' sun protection and skin self-examination behaviors to help improve skin cancer outcomes. Insights gathered from community leaders and health care providers provided valuable additions to the community-derived data. Leveraging popular digital platforms among Hispanic individuals such as WhatsApp or Facebook could be a promising approach to skin cancer prevention. Recommendations from the community included the use of concise videos, illustrative images, clear text messages, tailored communications, narratives featuring personal experiences, designs that reflect cultural significance, and information from sources that are trusted by the community, which provided useful strategies for future intervention design among Hispanic individuals.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Hispanic or Latino , Qualitative Research , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Female , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Skin Neoplasms/ethnology , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , AgedABSTRACT
Cancer is the top leading cause of death among Latino people. Lack of health insurance is a significant contributor to inadequate cancer detection and treatment. Despite healthcare policy expansions such as the Affordable Care Act, Latino people persistently maintain the highest uninsured rate among any ethnic and racial group in the US, especially among Latino individuals who are immigrants or part of a mixed immigration status household. Recognizing that immigration status is a critical factor in the ability of Latino community members to seek health insurance and access healthcare services, a few US states and the District of Columbia have implemented policies that have expanded coverage to children and adults regardless of immigration status. Expansion of Medicaid eligibility regardless of immigration status may significantly benefit Latino communities, however the facilitators and barriers to enrolling in these programs need to be evaluated to ensure reach and achieve health equity across the cancer control continuum for all Latinos.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Hispanic or Latino , Insurance Coverage , Insurance, Health , Neoplasms , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humans , United States , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/ethnology , Medicaid , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Health Equity , Healthcare Disparities/ethnologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated internet platforms for distributing HIV self-tests (HIVSTs) to Black or African American (Black) and Hispanic or Latino men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). METHODS: We recruited MSM and TGW from general interest, dating, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender platforms. Two HIVSTs were mailed to all MSM and TGW. Surveys (screening, baseline, 4-month, and results reporting) were completed online. After 4 months, participants were mailed another HIVST and a dried blood spot card. All HIVST interpretations and images of HIVST devices were reported online. RESULTS: Of 2093 MSM and 102 TGW, most were recruited through general interest and dating platforms. Over 50% were 18-29 years old, most identified as gay or bisexual. Overall, 45% had not tested for HIV in the past 12 months, and 9.1% of MSM reported a positive (reactive for HIV antibodies) HIVST result, with the highest percentage among Black MSM (11.5%). Dating platforms recruited higher percentages of MSM who recorded positive results compared with MSM from general interest platforms during the intervention period (11.9% vs 5.5% (P < 0.0001)), and MSM who had never tested for HIV reported a greater percentage of positive HIVST results compared with MSM who had been tested for HIV before enrollment (16.1% vs. 7.1%; P < 0.0001). MSM were able to correctly interpret and report HIVST results. Of TGW, 7% reported a positive HIVST result. CONCLUSIONS: Internet dating and general interest platforms can be key to increasing awareness of infection among BMSM, HMSM, and TGW persons, including those who do not use existing HIV services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04219878.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , HIV Infections , Hispanic or Latino , Homosexuality, Male , Internet , Self-Testing , Transgender Persons , Humans , Male , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Female , Adult , United States , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , HIV Testing/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epilepsy is common among older adults, but previous incident studies have had limited ability to make comparisons across key subgroups. We aimed to provide updated epilepsy incidence estimates among older adults, comparing across age, sex, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: Using a random sample of 4,999,999 US Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of epilepsy incidence using administrative claims for 2016-2019. Sampled beneficiaries were enrolled in the Fee-for-Service (FFS) program in each of 2016-2018 and had no epilepsy claims in those years. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic beneficiaries were oversampled to ensure adequate cases for detailed comparisons. Incidence in 2019 was identified in the Master Beneficiary Summary File as ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient nondrug claims occurring at least 1 day apart (ICD-10 G40.x). Incidence models were estimated by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and combinations thereof, with adjustment for the racial/ethnic oversampling. RESULTS: We identified 20,545 incident epilepsy cases. The overall epilepsy incidence rate (IR) was 393 per 100,000 (99% CI 385-400). Incidence peaked at ages 85-89 (504 [481-529]) and was higher for men (396 [385-407]) than women (376 [366-385]). The sex difference in IRs was constant with age. Incidence was higher for non-Hispanic Black (678 [653-702]) and Hispanic (405 [384-426]), and lower for non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (272 [239-305]) beneficiaries, compared with non-Hispanic White beneficiaries (354 [299-408]). The age-specific IRs significantly differed by race/ethnicity and sex, but only among non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries-where men had higher rates at younger ages and women at older ages. DISCUSSION: We found higher epilepsy IRs among those enrolled in the Medicare FFS system 2016-2019 than previous studies using Medicare claims data from at least a decade ago. The risk of epilepsy onset is higher for those in their late 80s, men, and non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic older adults. There is also evidence that these age-graded risks operate differently for Black men and Black women. Efforts to provide care and services that improve quality of life for older adults living with epilepsy should consider differences by multiple social characteristics simultaneously: age, sex, and race/ethnicity.
Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Medicare , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Male , Female , Aged , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/ethnology , Incidence , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Ethnicity , Sex Factors , Age Factors , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Racial Groups , Black or African AmericanABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a multi-system inflammatory skin disorder with early onset in the skin. It is well known that Black and Hispanic children in the United States experience specific barriers in regards to accessing care for AD, including greater severity on presentation and more need for care including increased usage of emergency services. Understanding these social determinants is vital if social change is to be made and if policies are to be constructed to create enduring reductions in disparity in a meaningful way that can potentially level disease severity and access to care for all segments of the family.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Health Services Accessibility , Severity of Illness Index , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , United States , Healthcare Disparities , Hispanic or Latino , Black or African American , ChildABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immigrant Latinas (who are foreign-born but now reside in the USA) are at greater risk for developing postpartum depression than the general perinatal population, but many face barriers to treatment. To address these barriers, we adapted the Mothers and Babies Course-an evidence-based intervention for postpartum depression prevention-to a virtual group format. Additional adaptations are inclusion of tailored supplemental child health content and nutrition benefit assistance. We are partnering with Early Learning Centers (ELC) across the state of Maryland to deliver and test the adapted intervention. METHODS: The design is a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. A total of 300 participants will be individually randomized to immediate (N = 150) versus delayed (N = 150) receipt of the intervention, Mothers and Babies Virtual Group (MB-VG). The intervention will be delivered by trained Early Learning Center staff. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms (measured via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), parenting self-efficacy (measured via the Parental Cognition and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale (PACOTIS) Parenting Self-Efficacy subscale), and parenting responsiveness (measured via the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument) at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Depressive episodes (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V- Disorders Research Version) at 3-month and 6-month post-intervention will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include social support, mood management, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, food insecurity, and mental health stigma at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Exploratory child outcomes are dysregulation and school readiness at 6-month post-intervention. Intervention fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness will also be assessed guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first to test the efficacy of a group-based virtual perinatal depression intervention with Latina immigrants, for whom stark disparities exist in access to health services. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will allow rigorous examination of barriers and facilitators to delivery of the intervention package (including supplemental components) which will provide important information on factors influencing intervention effectiveness and the scalability of intervention components in Early Learning Centers and other child-serving settings. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05873569.
Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Hispanic or Latino , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Depression, Postpartum/ethnology , Depression, Postpartum/therapy , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Depression, Postpartum/prevention & control , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Maryland , Mother-Child Relations , Mothers/psychology , Parenting/psychology , Parenting/ethnology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Self Efficacy , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective tool to prevent HIV, yet it is underutilized among women. The current study aims to evaluate the awareness, attitudes, and perceptions of PrEP among a large survey sample of Black and Latina women in New York City (NYC). Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted in high HIV incidence neighborhoods in NYC among Black, Latina, and Afro-Latina women who reported recent sex with a man in 2017 (n = 398) and 2018 (n = 405). About 40% of participants were aware of PrEP, whereas 30.4% indicated interest in using it. The top reason for not utilizing it was low HIV risk perception. However, most participants supported the idea that using PrEP meant asserting control over their health (94.1%). Primary care providers and obstetricians/gynecologists were participants' preferred sources for PrEP (91.6%). Across survey cycles, compared to non-Black Latina participants, Black participants had significantly higher PrEP awareness (44.4% vs. 29.1%). PrEP awareness was also significantly higher among survey participants in 2018 (45.2%) than in 2017 (34.3%). Less than half of the participants were aware of PrEP, but those who were aware expressed largely positive attitudes toward the medication. Our findings may inform future PrEP implementation strategies to optimize awareness and access to PrEP among women disproportionately affected by HIV, like focusing on personal empowerment instead of risk-based messaging and training women's sexual health care providers in PrEP provision.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , HIV Infections , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hispanic or Latino , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/ethnology , HIV Infections/psychology , New York City/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Health/ethnologyABSTRACT
Introduction: The purpose of this study is to culturally adapt the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer (ABC) measure for use in the Hispanic/Latino population living in the United States (US). Methods: In accordance with Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) Consortium guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of measures for content and linguistic validity, we conducted: two forward-translations, reconciliation, two back-translations, revision and harmonization, six cognitive interviews, revision, external expert review, and finalization of the version. We used a mixed methods approach, conducting cognitive interviews with Hispanic/Latino community members while also convening an expert panel of six clinicians, health professionals, and community representatives and including the in the entire process. After cross-culturally adapting the ABC measure, we assessed the psychometric properties of the instrument using item response theory analysis. Item parameters, discrimination and category thresholds, and standard errors were calculated. For each of the adapted subdomains, we used item information curves to report the graphical profile of item effectiveness. Results: Twenty-two Hispanic/Latino community members were enrolled in cognitive interviews, and Hispanics/Latinos fluent in Spanish completed the measure to assess its psychometric properties. Cognitive interviews revealed opportunities to improve items. Key changes from the original measure include the inclusion of gender inclusive language and an inquiry into e-cigarette use on items related to smoking habits. Psychometric property analyses revealed that the anticipated delay in seeking medical help, general cancer beliefs, and cancer screening beliefs and behaviors subdomains had some slope parameters that were < 1; this implies that those items were not able to adequately discriminate the latent trait and had poor performance. Discussion: The adapted ABC measure for US Hispanics/Latinos meets content and linguistic validity standards, with construct validity confirmed for cancer symptom recognition and barriers to symptomatic presentation subdomains, but revisions are necessary for others, highlighting the need for ongoing refinement to ensure the cultural appropriateness of instruments.
Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hispanic or Latino , Neoplasms , Psychometrics , Humans , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , United States , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cross-Cultural Comparison , AgedABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest disparities in outcomes in minoritized children after severe traumatic brain injury. We aimed to evaluate for disparities in intracranial pressure-directed therapies and outcomes after pediatric severe traumatic brain injury. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) Trial, which enrolled pediatric severe traumatic brain injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8) with an intracranial pressure monitor from 2014 to 2018. Patients admitted outside of the United States were excluded. Patients were categorized by race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and "Other"). We evaluated outcomes by assessing mortality and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics. Our analysis involved parametric and nonparametric testing. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 671 children were analyzed. Significant associations included older age in non-Hispanic White patients (P < .001), more surgical evacuations in "Other" (P < .001), and differences in discharge location (P = .040). The "other" cohort received hyperventilation less frequently (P = .046), although clinical status during Paco2 measurement was not known. There were no other significant differences in intracranial pressure-directed therapies. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower mortality (P = .004) but did not differ in unfavorable outcome (P = .810). Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics was less likely to be collected for non-Hispanic Black patients (69%; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests a general lack of disparities in intracranial pressure-directed therapies and outcomes in children after severe traumatic brain injury. Lower mortality in Hispanic patients without a concurrent decrease in unfavorable outcomes, and lower availability of Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics score for non-Hispanic Black patients merit further investigation.
Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Healthcare Disparities , Intracranial Pressure , Humans , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/ethnology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/mortality , Child , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity , Infant , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Glasgow Outcome Scale , White People/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Hispanic children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have lower 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) adherence and greater hazard of relapse compared with non-Hispanic White children. We examined the association between Spanish language and 6MP adherence, and hazard of relapse. 6MP adherence was measured electronically over a 6-month period. Participants were grouped by the language of demographic questionnaire completion: Non-Hispanic White-English Speaking (ES, n = 159), Hispanic-Spanish Speaking (Hispanic-SS, n = 59), and Hispanic-ES (n = 109). Hispanic-ES had significantly lower fitted median 6MP adherence compared with non-Hispanic White-ES participants (88.3%, 95% CI = 84.7% to 91.2% vs 95.0%, 95% CI = 93.6% to 96.2%, P < .001). There was no difference in fitted median 6MP adherence between Hispanic-ES and Hispanic-SS participants (88.3%, 95% CI = 84.1% to 91.5% vs 88.3%, 95% CI = 84.7% to 91.2%, P = .9) or adjusted hazard of relapse for Hispanic-SS participants (HR = 0.9, 95%CI = 0.3 to 2.4, P = .8). Spanish language use among Hispanic patients with ALL is not associated with lower 6MP adherence or greater relapse risk. Factors related to Hispanic ethnicity, apart from language, appear to influence adherence.
Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic , Hispanic or Latino , Language , Medication Adherence , Mercaptopurine , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Recurrence , White People , Humans , Mercaptopurine/therapeutic use , Mercaptopurine/administration & dosage , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/ethnology , Female , Male , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Child , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/ethnology , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , White People/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Importance: Determining the influence of race and ethnicity on change in cognitive test performance has significant implications for clinical practice and research in populations at risk for Alzheimer disease. Objective: To evaluate the significance of race and ethnicity in predicting longitudinal cognitive test performance and to develop models to support evidence-based practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included baseline and 24-month follow-up data that were obtained from the Health and Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities (HABS-HD) study, an ongoing longitudinal observational study of aging and dementia in a multiracial, multiethnic cohort. Participants included community-dwelling adults and elders living in the Dallas and Fort Worth metropolitan area who were Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults older than the age of 50 years and were cognitively unimpaired. Exposure: The primary exposure of interest was time, measured in months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic variables included age, sex, education, and race and ethnicity. Cognitive domains included attention and working memory, processing speed, language, memory, and executive functioning. Linear regression models predicted follow-up performance from baseline performance and demographic variables for 13 commonly used neuropsychological tests. Follow-up testing was the primary outcome for all domains. Raw scores from 13 standardized tests were used for analyses. Results: This study included 799 adults who were cognitively unimpaired (352 Hispanic individuals [44.1%]; 447 non-Hispanic individuals [55.9%]; 524 female [65.6%]; mean [SD] age, 65.4 [8.1] years). In the regression models, all 13 follow-up scores were significantly predicted from their respective baseline scores and demographic variables. Baseline performance and education were the most consistent predictors of follow-up scores, contributing to all 13 models. Age was significantly associated with follow-up in 11 models, and sex was significant in 5 models. Race and ethnicity contributed to 10 of 13 models, with Hispanic participants predicted to have poorer follow-up scores than their non-Hispanic White counterparts on each test. Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal study of cognitive change in Hispanic and non-Hispanic older adults who were cognitively unimpaired, standardized regression-based models were influenced by multiple demographic variables, including race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the importance of including race and ethnicity in such cognitive change models. This ability to accurately predict cognitive change is expected to become increasingly important as clinical practice and clinical trials need to become more diverse and culturally appropriate in this burgeoning global medical and societal crisis.
Subject(s)
Cognition , Hispanic or Latino , Neuropsychological Tests , Humans , Female , Male , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Aged , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Cognitive Dysfunction/ethnology , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/psychology , Aging/ethnologyABSTRACT
Importance: In the US, infants born to non-Hispanic Black birthing parents are 50% more likely to be born preterm than those born to non-Hispanic White birthing parents, and individual-level factors do not fully account for this inequity. Neighborhood context, rooted in historic patterns of structural racism, may facilitate understanding patterns of inequity in preterm birth. Objective: To estimate the association between neighborhood opportunity level, measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI), and preterm birth among infants in Massachusetts. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional, population-based study, Massachusetts birth certificates from 3 large metropolitan areas (Boston, Springfield, and Worcester) were linked to US Census tract-level data from the COI, and log binomial regression models and generalized estimating equations were fit to examine associations of different levels of opportunity with preterm birth. Singleton infants born in Massachusetts between February 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, were included. Analyses were originally conducted in 2019 and updated in 2024. Exposure: Level of child opportunity (measured by the COI) at the US Census tract level. Race and ethnicity were ascertained from the birth certificate, as reported by the birthing parent. Main Outcomes and Measures: Live birth before 37 completed weeks' gestation. Results: The analytic dataset included 267â¯553 infants, of whom 18.9% were born to Hispanic, 10.1% to non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, 10.1% to non-Hispanic Black, and 61.0% to non-Hispanic White birthing parents. More than half of infants born to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic birthing parents were born into very low opportunity neighborhoods, and in crude models, this was associated with greater prevalence of preterm birth relative to very high opportunity neighborhoods (prevalence ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.37-1.52). After adjustment for covariates, infants born into very low opportunity neighborhoods still had a greater prevalence of preterm birth (prevalence ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of neighborhood opportunity and preterm birth, elevated risk associated with exposure to a very low opportunity neighborhood, coupled with the disproportionate exposure by race and ethnicity, points to a modifiable factor that may contribute to racial and ethnic inequities in preterm birth. Future research should investigate interventions that seek to address neighborhood opportunity.
Subject(s)
Premature Birth , Humans , Premature Birth/ethnology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Infant, Newborn , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Adult , Male , Pregnancy , Neighborhood Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The USDA Thrifty Food Plan (TFP) is a federal estimate of a healthy diet at lowest cost for US population groups defined by gender and age. The present goal was to develop a version of the TFP that was more tailored to the observed dietary patterns of self-identified Hispanic participants in NHANES 2013-16. Analyses used the same national food prices and nutrient composition data as the TFP 2021. Diet quality was measured using the Healthy Eating Index 2015. The new Hispanic TFP (H-TFP) was cost-neutral with respect to TFP 2021 and fixed at $186/week for a family of four. Two H-TFP models were created using a quadratic programming (QP) algorithm. Fresh pork was modeled separately from other red meats. Hispanic NHANES participants were younger, had lower education and incomes, but had similar or higher HEI 2015 scores than non-Hispanics. Their diet included more pulses, beans, fruit, 100% juice, grain-based dishes, and soups, but less pizza, coffee, candy, and desserts. The H-TFP market basket featured more pork, whole grains, 100% fruit juice, and cheese. The second TFP model showed that pork could replace both poultry and red meat, while satisfying all nutrient needs. A vegetarian H-TFP proved infeasible for most age-gender groups. Healthy, affordable, and culturally relevant food plans can be developed for US population subgroups.
Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy , Hispanic or Latino , Nutrition Surveys , Humans , Male , Female , Diet, Healthy/economics , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , United States , Adolescent , Nutrition Policy , Nutritive Value , AgedABSTRACT
Tools to briefly assess diet among US Spanish-speaking adults are needed to identify individuals at risk for cardiometabolic disease (CMD) related to diet. Two registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) recruited bilingual medical students to translate the validated Diet Risk Score (DRS) into Spanish (DRS-S). Participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center. Students administered the DRS-S and one 24-h recall (Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24®) Dietary Assessment Tool) on one day; a second recall was administered within 1 week. Recalls were scored using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, a measure of adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Spearman correlations, weighted kappa, and ANOVA were conducted using SAS 9.4 to assess the relative validity of the DRS-S. Thirty-one Spanish-speaking adults (female: n = 17, 53%; mean age: 58 (42-69)) completed assessments. The mean DRS-S was 9 (SD = 4.2) (max: 27; higher score = higher risk) and the mean HEI-2015 score was 65.7 (SD = 9.7) (max: 100; higher score = lower risk), with significant agreement between measures (r: -0.45 (p = 0.01)), weighted kappa: -0.3 (p = 0.03). The DRS-S can be used in resource-constrained settings to assess diet for intervention and referral to RDNs. The DRS-S should be tested in clinical care to assess the impact of dietary changes to reduce CMD risk.