ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare the buccal and palatal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth produced by hybrid hyrax (HH) and conventional hyrax (CH) expanders in growing patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 32 patients with posterior crossbites in the late mixed dentition was recruited and randomly allocated into two groups. Group HH was composed of 18 individuals with a mean age of 10.7 years (six female, 12 male) treated with a hybrid expander with two anterior parasagittal miniscrews. Group CH was composed of 14 individuals with a mean age of 11.4 years (six female, eight male) treated with a conventional Hyrax expander. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were obtained before expansion (T1) and after 11 months when the expander was removed (T2). Buccal and palatal bone plate thickness and height of maxillary posterior teeth were measured. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney tests (P < .05). RESULTS: The CH group showed greater decreases of the buccal bone plate height (mean change: 1.27 mm) at the maxillary first premolars compared to the HH group (mean change: 0.11 mm, P = .001). No intergroup difference was found for changes in the buccal and palatal bone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid expanders showed a tendency to cause less negative impact on the buccal bone plate height of first premolars compared to conventional Hyrax expanders. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Both hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders are safe for the alveolar bone morphology in the late mixed dentition.
Subject(s)
Alveolar Process , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Palatal Expansion Technique , Humans , Female , Male , Palatal Expansion Technique/instrumentation , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Child , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Dentition, Mixed , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Bicuspid/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report and rank orthodontic finishing errors recorded in the clinical phase of the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) examination and correlate pretreatment case complexity with orthodontic treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional survey collected retrospective data from the clinical phase of BBO examinations between 2016 and 2023. The quality of orthodontic clinical outcomes of each case was assessed by means of the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE), while case complexity was evaluated using the Discrepancy Index (DI), both tools provided by the American Board of Orthodontics. Survey items were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a correlation analysis between total CRE and DI scores (p<0.05) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 447 orthodontic records was included. Orthodontic finishing errors were often observed, and no case was completely perfect. In the total CRE score, an average of 15 points was discounted for each case. Most frequently found issues involved problems with alignment, buccolingual inclination, marginal ridge, and occlusal relationship. The median DI score for initial case complexity was 22.0 (range 10.0 - 67.0). There was no significant correlation between the DI and CRE scores (p=0.106). CONCLUSION: Orthodontic finishing errors are inevitable, even in well-finished board-approved cases. Rotation, excessive buccolingual inclination, and discrepancies in marginal ridges are the most frequently observed areas of concern, in that order. Moreover, while case complexity, determined by DI, can impact orthodontic planning and pose challenges for clinicians, the study did not consider it a determining factor in predicting treatment outcomes.
Subject(s)
Orthodontics , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Brazil , Orthodontics, Corrective , Specialty Boards , Malocclusion/classification , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Female , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to verify Bolton's values for tooth size ratios and to evaluate possible relationships to different occlusal traits using precise digital measurement methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Including 1000 consecutively selected patients from three study centres a digital, partially automated model analysis was performed utilizing the software OnyxCeph. The measurements comprised tooth width for calculation of anterior (AR) and overall ratio (OR) as a percentage, arch width, length, perimeter, overjet, overbite, space analysis in millimetre and the assessment of the angle classification. RESULTS: AR and OR were significantly increased compared to Bolton's ratios of 77.2% (AR) and 91.3% (OR). In the gender comparison, male patients showed larger tooth size ratios, especially in the OR. Patients with Angle Class II/1 and II/2 had smaller tooth size ratios than patients with Angle Class III and I. Thus, patients with Angle Class II/1 had the largest tooth diameters in all maxillary teeth and with Angle Class II/2 the smallest tooth sizes in the mandible. The largest tooth widths in the lower jaw were observed in the Angle Class III patient group. Furthermore, a negative correlation from AR/OR to overjet, overbite, and available space in lower jaw as well as a positive correlation to available space in upper jaw was detected. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear correlation between the tooth size ratios and the present dysgnathia as well as other orthodontically relevant occlusal traits. This prior knowledge about our patients is extremely important to create an individualized treatment plan and enable sufficient occlusion. To achieve a functionally good occlusion with correct overjet and overbite, it is essential that the maxillary and mandibular teeth are proportional in size. Any deviation from the ideal patient in terms of tooth size, number, shape, or arch must be considered in the pre-therapeutic treatment plan in combination with the existing dysgnathia in order to be able to achieve a stable anterior and posterior occlusion with appropriate adjustments to the therapy post-therapeutically.
Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Malocclusion , Odontometry , Tooth , Humans , Male , Female , Odontometry/methods , Malocclusion/pathology , Malocclusion/therapy , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Tooth/anatomy & histology , Sex Factors , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/anatomy & histology , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/pathology , Adolescent , Dental Arch/anatomy & histology , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/pathology , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging , Overbite/pathology , Maxilla/anatomy & histology , Young Adult , Adult , Models, Dental , Software , Dental OcclusionABSTRACT
Early orthodontic treatment is an important means of preventing and treating dentofacial deformities during the period of growth and development. In this stage, children have great potential in growth and development, high adaptability of muscles and temporomandibular joint, and good responsiveness to orthodontic force. Therefore, orthodontic intervention and treatment in this stage can prevent and guide the normal growth and development of dentition, occlusion and maxillofacial complex. This article summarizes the commonly used orthodontic techniques and appliances in the mixed dentition, including interceptive treatment of oral habits, application of functional appliances, fixed appliances, clear aligners, as well as management of severe crowding and space maintenance. This article comprehensively explains the application and indications of different orthodontic techniques in design and appliance selection in the treatment of malocclusions in the mixed dentition.
Subject(s)
Dentition, Mixed , Malocclusion , Humans , Malocclusion/therapy , Child , Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Orthodontics, Interceptive , Orthodontic Appliance DesignABSTRACT
Mouth breathing is one of the most common oral and maxillofacial abnormalities in children. Children with mouth breathing are often accompanied by obstructive sleep apnea, which not only affects children's dentofacial development, leading to the occurrence of malocclusion, but also may lead to a series of serious systemic complications. The diagnosis and treatment of mouth breathing and its related malocclusions require multidisciplinary collaboration. This paper discusses the etiology and harm of mouth breathing, diagnosis of mouth breathing related problems, correlation between mouth breathing and malocclusion, treatment of mouth breathing related malocclusions.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Mouth Breathing , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Malocclusion/therapy , Child , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Orthodontics, CorrectiveABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Digital technologies have expanded in the field of dentistry, especially in the clinical and diagnostic aspects of occlusal abnormalities. Consequently, the purpose of this narrative review is to identify and synthesize data concerning the effects of these sophisticated digital technologies on improved diagnostic performance, treatment interventions, and patient outcomes. METHODS: Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched and, therefore, performed to find the pertinent digital technologies in dentistry from the published literature. The search was conducted in the period between 2000 and 2024. The criteria for inclusion of the studies targeted technologies that were Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), intraoral scanners, 3D imaging, and Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM). Some of the comparing between conventional and modern approaches were raised. RESULTS: Digital technologies have enhanced the diagnostic process due to extended visualization and precise evaluation of occlusal disturbances Conclusion: It has been seen that the application of information technologies in dentistry significantly improved the diagnostics and therapy of occlusion disturbances. While there are some invincible challenges posed by these advancements, the prospects are noteworthy when it comes to accuracy, efficiency, and patient benefits.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Computer-Aided Design , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion/therapy , Digital Health/trendsABSTRACT
Pathological tooth wear is a dental problem that affects all age groups and appears to be increasing in prevalence. A subset of these patients may benefit from a combination of orthodontic and restorative care which will be discussed in this article. Orthodontics can help to create the necessary vertical, anterior-posterior and mesio-distal space for restorative work, reducing the need for tooth reduction and lessening the biological costs of restorative care, helping to reposition the gingival margins where this impacts upon aesthetics, as well as correcting co-existing malocclusion.
Subject(s)
Tooth Wear , Humans , Tooth Wear/therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Malocclusion/therapy , Esthetics, DentalABSTRACT
This article addresses the management of dental implants in joint orthodontic-restorative cases, emphasising the role of temporary skeletal anchorage devices and interdisciplinary treatment. Focused on complex malocclusions that require dental implants, the article navigates through critical aspects such as diagnosis, treatment planning, implant positioning challenges and the strategic role of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in cases with compromised anchorage. Effective communication, collaborative efforts and strategic planning are highlighted in determining optimal implant numbers, locations and timing of placement. A collaborative, strategic approach to managing the complexities of joint orthodontic-restorative cases involving dental implants is recommended.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Patient Care Team , Humans , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Patient Care Planning , Malocclusion/therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective/methodsABSTRACT
Over the last decades the percentage of adult orthodontic patients has substantially increased. Undeniably, an important motif for seeking orthodontic care at an older age is smile improvement, but this is not all. Frequently, impaired dentofacial aesthetics are combined with several other issues: severe dentoskeletal malocclusions; multiple tooth loss due to caries or endodontic failure; dental agenesis or trauma; periodontal breakdown; or functional problems, such as temporomandibular disorders or obstructive sleep apnoea. Therefore, comprehensive adult treatment mostly requires close collaboration of a team of equally well-trained dental specialists to select and execute the most suitable treatment option for the individual patient from day one. With joint planning, intensive communication with the patient and the involved specialists, and continuous monitoring of the treatment process, true patient-centred care can be delivered. In order to serve the individual patient best, the treating orthodontist does not only need thorough speciality training and continuing education, but furthermore, should be well-equipped with sufficient knowledge of the other dental fields of expertise. In combination with digital technology as an important tool for enhancing communication and efficient exchange of information between all involved team members, excellent joint clinical skills will take comprehensive interdisciplinary treatment to the next level.
Subject(s)
Patient Care Team , Humans , Adult , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Malocclusion/therapy , Orthodontics , Patient Care PlanningABSTRACT
This review aimed to analyze the correlation between atypical swallowing and malocclusions and how this dysfunction can be treated. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed to conduct this systematic review, and the protocol was registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the CRD42024499707. A thorough search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to find papers that discussed myofunctional and orthodontic treatment for patients with atypical swallowing and malocclusion from 01 January 2003 to 27 November 2023. The search yielded 2554 articles, of which only 12 records were selected for qualitative analysis. The analysis of these articles revealed that orofacial myofunctional therapy, criab appliance, Habit corrector™, and soft tongue restrainers are potential therapies for treating atypical swallowing and malocclusions. The tongue's position affects muscle behavior, leading to malocclusions that can be treated with various therapies, resulting in effective clinical outcomes. However, more research is required to delve deeper into the topic.
Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Malocclusion , Myofunctional Therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective , Humans , Malocclusion/therapy , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Deglutition Disorders/physiopathology , Myofunctional Therapy/methods , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Deglutition/physiology , Tongue/physiopathologyABSTRACT
This study evaluated the mandibular development induced by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) therapy in mixed dentition patients with different vertical growth patterns through long-term observation. The research utilized a retrospective design that included two cohorts: a control group consisting of pediatric subjects with individualized malocclusions, and an experimental group received RME therapy. A total of 60 subjects were included; 37 in the RME group (17 males and 20 females) and 23 in the control group (13 males and 10 females). Based on mandibular plane angles, 19 pertinent cephalometric variables were quantified with Dolphin Imaging software, and participants were subclassified into high-angle and normal-angle subgroups. Changes in the groups during the observation period were statistically analyzed with a t-test. Compared to the control group, both sagittal parameters tended to decrease after treatment in the RME group (p < 0.05), and none of the vertical correlations were statistically different (p > 0.05). Within the normal-angle experimental subgroup, sagittal parameters markedly decreased when contrasted with their normal-angle control group (p < 0.05). Notably, a substantive decrease in overjet was solely observable in the sagittal dimension among the high-angle expansion subgroup when compared to the high-angle control subgroup (p < 0.05). In the vertical dimension, neither the normal-angle nor high-angle subgroups exhibited any statistically significant differences from their respective control cohorts (p > 0.05). Based on long-term observation, RME therapy promotes mandible sagittal growth of the mandible in subjects with normal-angle vertical growth patterns. A similar tendency was not observed in subjects with high-angle vertical growth patterns. In addition, the mandibular plane angle did not increase after RME in children with high-angles.
Subject(s)
Cephalometry , Dentition, Mixed , Mandible , Palatal Expansion Technique , Vertical Dimension , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Child , Mandible/growth & development , Malocclusion/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess skeletal and dental effects and evaluate possible side effects of maxillary expansion with two different appliances, directly after expansion and 1 year postexpansion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with unilateral posterior crossbite (mean 9.5 ± 0.9 years) were randomized to either rapid maxillary expansion (RME) banded on the deciduous second molars and bonded to the primary canines or slow expansion with quad helix (QH) on the permanent first molars. Cone-beam computed tomography records were taken at baseline, directly after correction of the posterior crossbite and at follow-up 1 year after expansion. RESULTS: All patients were analyzed. RME opened the midpalatal suture more anteriorly and inferiorly (mean 4.1 mm) and less posteriorly and superiorly (mean 1.0 mm). No effect on midpalatal suture could be shown in the QH group after expansion, P < .001. Buccal bone width had significantly decreased (P < .001) in the QH group compared with the RME group. Buccal fenestrations and root resorption on the left first molar had a higher prevalence directly after expansion finished in the QH group (P = .0086, P = .013) but were not significant at 1-year follow-up (P = .11, P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Opening of the suture with RME was more anterior and inferior, and the QH did not open the midpalatal suture at all. More buccal bone loss and fenestrations were seen on the permanent first molar in patients treated with conventional QH than RME anchored to deciduous teeth.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Malocclusion , Molar , Palatal Expansion Technique , Humans , Child , Female , Male , Follow-Up Studies , Malocclusion/therapy , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Maxilla , Treatment Outcome , Root Resorption/etiology , Root Resorption/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: The aim was to compare the activity of the masseter muscles in children with different types of breathing. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted including patients aged 6-12 years with mixed dentition, who came for oral care at the Master's Degree in Pediatric Dentistry program at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sample was divided into three groups: nasal breathers without dental alterations (control group), oral breathers with dental malocclusion, and oral breathers with previous orthodontic treatment. An electromyography was performed, and statistic methods were conducted with a 95% confidence to contrast hypothesis. Results: A total of 122 children were analyzed and distributed into three groups. The electrical muscle activity of masseters was significantly different between the study groups (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Pairwise comparisons revealed a significantly higher electrical muscle activity in the control group (nasal breathers) during chewing compared to both groups of oral breathers (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Orthodontic treatment decreased electrical muscle activity during isometric contraction in oral breathers compared to nasal breathers (p < 0.001), but did not significantly affect electrical muscle activity during chewing. Higher decompensation values were obtained in oral breathers without previous orthodontic treatment compared the other study groups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons), although electrical muscle activity values were similar in both groups of oral breathers (p > 0.05 for both comparisons). Conclusions: Differences in electrical muscle activity between nasal and oral breathers can be confirmed. Oral breathers with and without orthodontic treatment showed lower electrical muscle activity of masseters during chewing than nasal breathers, while at isometric contraction, only oral breathers with previous orthodontic treatment showed lower electrical activity. Higher decompensation values were found in oral breathers without previous orthodontic treatment, in comparison to the control group and oral breathers with previous orthodontic treatment.
Subject(s)
Electromyography , Masticatory Muscles , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Masticatory Muscles/physiology , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Respiration , Masseter Muscle/physiology , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Mastication/physiology , Mouth Breathing/physiopathology , Mouth Breathing/complications , Malocclusion/physiopathology , Malocclusion/complications , Malocclusion/therapyABSTRACT
A patient presented desiring to improve her esthetics and reduce masseter muscle pain prior to her upcoming wedding. Although the patient had a full-mouth rehabilitation with porcelain restorations at age 16, she presented with extensive overjet, unbalanced occlusion, and lack of contact from premolar to premolar. The clinician was faced with the challenge of determining the best course of treatment. After completing thorough record-taking and a detailed analysis following a systematic approach, the clinician developed a facially driven treatment plan that was carried out over eight phases. The patient's existing crowns were replaced at a reduced vertical dimension of occlusion, esthetics were enhanced, muscle pain was relieved, and her goals were achieved.
Subject(s)
Esthetics, Dental , Mouth Rehabilitation , Overbite , Humans , Female , Mouth Rehabilitation/methods , Overbite/therapy , Patient Care Planning , Crowns , Vertical Dimension , Malocclusion/therapy , Masseter Muscle , Dental Porcelain , AdolescentSubject(s)
Malocclusion , Maxilla , Palatal Expansion Technique , Humans , Malocclusion/therapy , Maxilla/abnormalities , Dental Implantation/methods , Female , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among adolescents granted (G) versus not granted (NG) publicly funded orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adolescents aged 15-20 years who were granted versus not granted publicly funded orthodontic treatment responded to a web-based survey, assessing OHRQoL in relation to functional impact, psychological impact, and motivators for orthodontic treatment. Before the survey, pretesting of the questionnaire was conducted to ensure its reliability. Differences between the groups were tested using the chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Reliability was assessed using Cohen's κ and Pearson's correlation coefficient during the pretest phase. RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients, equally distributed between a G and an NG group, responded to the survey. Gender, age, and demographic distribution were comparable in both groups. All respondents expressed a high subjective treatment need and similar answers regarding functional aspects. Orthodontic treatment motivators (G: 86.2% and NG: 94.7%, p = 0.443) were primarily related to improved self-esteem, overall well-being, facial appearance, and being able to laugh without embarrassment. The NG group expressed a more negative OHRQoL impact due to the appearance of their teeth compared with the G group (p < 0.001) and a negative impact caused by the position of their teeth (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic treatment need indices should aim to reinforce subjective measures as adolescents express similar motivators for orthodontic treatment, regardless of the clinician's objectively based decision about treatment need.
Subject(s)
Oral Health , Orthodontics, Corrective , Quality of Life , Humans , Adolescent , Female , Male , Orthodontics, Corrective/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Motivation , Malocclusion/psychology , Malocclusion/therapy , Self ConceptABSTRACT
This study was designed to evaluate and compare the usefulness of clear aligners and conventional appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in pediatric population. Emphasis was placed on the relative benefits and implications of employing clear aligners owing to their escalating prevalence and acceptability. The study participants were divided into four groups: Clear Aligner Group (CAG), Conventional Appliance Group (ConAG), Malocclusion Control Group (MCG), and Normal Control Group (NCG). Parameters including sociodemographic indicators and daily routines were assessed. OHRQoL was evaluated via the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ). Psychological conditions were assessed through the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). Statistical differences were found between the four groups regarding CPQ subscales and total scores (p < 0.05). CAG was better than ConAG (p < 0.05) regarding the scores of functional limitations, emotional and social well-being, and total score, however no significant difference was discovered in the oral symptoms scores (p = 0.62). Moreover, all the treatment groups had worse OHRQoL compared to NCG (p < 0.05). Malocclusions and their treatments did not increase the psychological distress as per the DASS results. A novel correlation between the excessive tooth brushing and reduced OHRQoL was also observed (p < 0.05). The study herein emphasized the benefits of clear aligners in children and adolescents with OHRQoL. It was highlighted that the clear aligners had potential and were preferred for the adolescent orthodontic treatment.
Subject(s)
Oral Health , Quality of Life , Humans , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/psychology , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentationABSTRACT
This study aimed to assess the changes in interproximal contacts before and after orthodontic treatment using the OXIS classification. OXIS refers to the types of contacts that is open (O), point contact (X), straight contact (I), and curved contact (S), and thus the acronym "OXIS". Interproximal contact data of 30 orthodontic patients were obtained at three time points: T0, at the beginning of treatment; T1, at the end of fixed appliance treatment; and T2, one-year post-treatment. For the maxillary second molar-first molar contact, the most common contact at T0, was the "S" pattern (41.6%) which increased to 61.6% at T1 and reduced to 48.3% at T2. For the maxillary first molar-second premolar contact, maxillary second premolar-first premolar contact, and maxillary first premolar-canine contact, the most common contact at T0 was the "I" pattern (58.3%, 46.5% and 43.3%, respectively), which increased to 88.3%, 93.3% and 73.3%, respectively at T1 and decreased to 80%, 88.3% and 71.6%, respectively at T2. For the maxillary canine-lateral incisor contact and lateral-central incisor contact, the most common contact at T0 was the "O" pattern (45% and 33.3%) while it was the "X" pattern at T1 (63.3% and 80%) and T2 (58.3% and 80%). A similar observation was made for the posterior mandibular and anterior teeth. There was statistical significance for most of the changes in the mandibular contacts (p Ë 0.05). Interproximal contacts change significantly from T0 to T1. Broader contacts were normal at T1 and T2 in the posterior segments. At T2, changes in the interproximal contacts were observed in the posterior segments, and substantial evidence was available, particularly for the mandibular arch.
Subject(s)
Dental Occlusion , Humans , Female , Male , Child , Adolescent , Orthodontics, Corrective/instrumentation , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Malocclusion/therapyABSTRACT
Introduction: The arrival date young patient's first orthodontic consultation is unrestricted but may influence the choice of treatment plan as well as its modalities. The objective of this study was to determine the factors that influence the date of the first consultation at the orthodontic office: advice from a third party or a health professional, the patient's gender, the socioeconomic level, the actual need for orthodontic treatment, and the vertical and anteroposterior skeletal dysmorphia. Materials and Methods: Young patient's file younger than 16 years were systematically included. A Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis test was performed in univariate and multivariate analysis. The threshold was 5%. Results: 456 young patients were included. Anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy, referral by an acquaintance, and socioeconomic level appeared to be factors influencing patient arrival date. Gender, actual need for orthodontic treatment, referral from a health professional, and vertical skeletal discrepancy did not influence the arrival date at the office. Discussion: The date of consultation is not related to the actual orthodontic treatment need. Word-of-mouth seems to play an important role. Patients seem to relate an anteroposterior discrepancy to the need to consult an orthodontist, but do not relate it to vertical discrepancy, although ventilation may be related to severe dysmorphia. Conclusion: This study encourages more communication about orthodontic treatment indications with patients and caregivers.
Introduction: La date d'arrivée du jeune patient en première consultation orthodontique est libre mais peut influencer le choix du plan de traitement, ainsi que ses modalités. L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer les facteurs qui influencent la date de première consultation au cabinet d'orthodontie : le conseil d'un tiers ou d'un professionnel de santé, le genre du patient, le niveau socio-économique, le besoin réel de traitement orthodontique, la dysmorphie squelettique verticale et antéro-postérieure. Matériels et méthodes: Les dossiers de jeunes patients de moins de 16 ans ont été systématiquement inclus. Un test de Wilcoxon et Kruskal-Wallis a été effectué en analyse univariée et multivariée. Le seuil retenu était de 5 %. Résultats: Au total, 456 patients ont été inclus. Le décalage squelettique antéro-postérieur, le fait d'être adressé par une connaissance et le niveau socio-économique semblent être des facteurs influençant la date d'arrivée du jeune patient. Le genre, le besoin réel de traitement orthodontique, le fait d'être adressé par un professionnel de santé, le décalage squelettique vertical n'ont pas d'influence sur la date d'arrivée au cabinet. Discussion: La date de consultation n'est pas liée au besoin réel de traitement. Le bouche à oreille semble jouer un rôle important. Les patients semblent faire le lien entre un décalage antéro-postérieur et la nécessité de consulter un orthodontiste, mais ne le font pas pour le décalage vertical alors que la ventilation peut être liée à des dysmorphies sévères. Conclusion: Cette étude encourage à communiquer davantage sur les indications de traitement orthodontique avec les patients et les soignants.
Subject(s)
Orthodontics, Corrective , Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Orthodontics, Corrective/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Malocclusion/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors , Dental Offices/statistics & numerical data , Orthodontics/methods , Orthodontics/statistics & numerical data , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of malocclusion, continuous monitoring of the three-dimensional relationship between dental roots and the surrounding alveolar bone is essential for preventing complications from orthodontic procedures. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides detailed root and bone data, but its high radiation dose limits its frequent use, consequently necessitating an alternative for ongoing monitoring. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop a deep learning-based cross-temporal multimodal image fusion system for acquiring root and jawbone information without additional radiation, enhancing the ability of orthodontists to monitor risk. METHODS: Utilizing CBCT and intraoral scans (IOSs) as cross-temporal modalities, we integrated deep learning with multimodal fusion technologies to develop a system that includes a CBCT segmentation model for teeth and jawbones. This model incorporates a dynamic kernel prior model, resolution restoration, and an IOS segmentation network optimized for dense point clouds. Additionally, a coarse-to-fine registration module was developed. This system facilitates the integration of IOS and CBCT images across varying spatial and temporal dimensions, enabling the comprehensive reconstruction of root and jawbone information throughout the orthodontic treatment process. RESULTS: The experimental results demonstrate that our system not only maintains the original high resolution but also delivers outstanding segmentation performance on external testing datasets for CBCT and IOSs. CBCT achieved Dice coefficients of 94.1 % and 94.4 % for teeth and jawbones, respectively, and it achieved a Dice coefficient of 91.7 % for the IOSs. Additionally, in the context of real-world registration processes, the system achieved an average distance error (ADE) of 0.43 mm for teeth and 0.52 mm for jawbones, significantly reducing the processing time. CONCLUSION: We developed the first deep learning-based cross-temporal multimodal fusion system, addressing the critical challenge of continuous risk monitoring in orthodontic treatments without additional radiation exposure. We hope that this study will catalyze transformative advancements in risk management strategies and treatment modalities, fundamentally reshaping the landscape of future orthodontic practice.