Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57.989
Filter
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1414125, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224557

ABSTRACT

This study examines the factors influencing users' intention to continue using mobile medical apps within the framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Through a combination of questionnaire surveys and interviews, the research finds that doctor-patient trust, Performance Expectancy (PE), social influence, and facilitating conditions significantly impact users' intention to utilize mobile medical apps. Furthermore, the study reveals the moderating effect of doctor-patient trust on social influence, indicating an increased trust level during the epidemic, attributed to positive media coverage, complimentary medical services, and risk-sharing initiatives. These results provide valuable insights for the field of internet healthcare, COVID-19 response strategies, health information management, and the advancement of digital health technologies, spotlighting the pivotal roles of trust, PE, and social influence in fostering sustained engagement with mobile health apps.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mobile Applications , Physician-Patient Relations , Trust , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Male , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Intention , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
2.
JMIR Dermatol ; 7: e57172, 2024 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although several digital health interventions (DHIs) have shown promise in the care of skin diseases their uptake in Germany has been limited. To fully understand the reasons for the low uptake, an in-depth analysis of patients' and health care providers' barriers and facilitators in dermatology is needed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore and compare attitudes, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of patients, dermatologists, and nurses toward DHIs in dermatology. METHODS: We conducted 6 web-based focus groups each with patients (n=34), dermatologists (n=30), and nurses (n=30) using a semistructured interview guide with short descriptions of DHIs described in the literature. A content analysis was performed using deductive constructs, following the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology framework, and inductive categories. RESULTS: Patients identified many positive performance expectancies, such as reduced travel times and improvement in follow-up appointments. Dermatologists also stated positive effects (eg, promotion of standardized care), but also negative implications of health care digitalization (eg, increased workload). All stakeholders reported that a DHI should bring additional value to all stakeholders. A lack of digital competence among patients was identified as the major barrier to adoption by all 3 groups. Nurses and dermatologists want apps that are easy to use and easy to implement into their daily routines. Trust in selected institutions, colleagues, and physicians was identified as a facilitator. Patients reported their dependence on the dermatologists' acceptance. All groups expressed concerns about data privacy risks and dermatologists stated insecurities toward data privacy laws. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure successful digitalization in dermatology, apps should be user-friendly, adapted to users' skill levels, and beneficial for all stakeholders. The incorporation of dermatologists' perspectives is especially important as their acceptance may impact use among patients and nurses. DHIs should ensure and be transparent about data privacy. The found barriers and facilitators can be used for implementation strategies.


Subject(s)
Dermatologists , Dermatology , Focus Groups , Nurses , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Nurses/psychology , Middle Aged , Dermatologists/psychology , Germany , Attitude of Health Personnel , Telemedicine , Qualitative Research , Skin Diseases/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Aged , Digital Health
3.
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care ; 23: 23259582241272007, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39228204

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uptake of HIV early infant diagnosis (HEID) among HIV-exposed infants is the key to timely initiation of Antiretroviral Treatment (ART). However, despite the availability of HEID services in Tanzania, its uptake is low. We aimed to determine predictors of mothers living with HIV' with HIV-exposed infants' uptake of HEID services in Iringa District, Tanzania. METHODS: A health facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Iringa District from May to June 2023. Mothers with HIV-exposed infants were recruited in the study through a multistage sampling technique and interviewed using pre-tested structured questions. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine potential predictors of HEID uptake. RESULTS: A total of 309 mothers with HIV-exposed infants participated in the study. About 78.3% of the HIV-exposed infants had initial DNA PCR for HEID within 6 weeks of age and 86.1% within 8 weeks. Most mothers had high perceived benefits on uptake of HEID with a mean score of 4.3, high perceived self-efficacy with a mean score of 3.8 and 2.7 perceived risk of HIV infection on their HIV-exposed infants on the 5 scale Likert scale with 5 showing the highest perceived benefit, self-efficacy and risk. High perceived self-efficacy and being a businesswoman were the predictors of uptake of HEID. The odds of self-efficacy on the uptake of HEID by 2.4 times (aOR 2.4 95% CI 1.6-3.2) within 6 weeks of age and 1.9 (aOR 1.9 95% CI 1.3-2.7) within 8 weeks. The odds of being a businesswoman were 0.4 for 6 weeks and 0.3 for 8 weeks (aOR 0.4 95% CI 0.2-0.8) and (aOR 0.3 95% CI 0.1-0.8) respectively. CONCLUSION: Over three-quarters of the HIV-exposed infants had initial DNA PCR for HEID testing as recommended. Perceived self-efficacy was the main factor influencing HEID uptake. These findings highlight the need for strengthening HIV-positive mother's self-efficacy for improved uptake of HEID services.


Predictors of mothers living with HIV' uptake of HIV early infant diagnosis services in Iringa District, TanzaniaThis study aimed to find out the factors associated with the uptake of HIV early infant diagnosis (HEID) services among mothers living with HIV in Iringa District, Tanzania. The uptake of HEID in Tanzania is still below the 95% national and global target of ending AIDS as a public health by 2030 We employed a cross-sectional study design and collected data from May to June 2023 to determine predictors of mothers with HIV-exposed infants' uptake of HEID in Iringa District, Tanzania. The analysis was done by descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis. A total of 309 mothers with HIV-exposed infants participated in the study. About 78.3% of the HIV-exposed infants had initial DNA PCR for HEID within 6 weeks of age and 86.1% within 8 weeks. Most mothers had high perceived benefits on uptake of HEID with a mean score of 4.3, high perceived self-efficacy with a mean score of 3.8 and 2.7 perceived risk of HIV infection on their HIV-exposed infants. High perceived self-efficacy was positively associated These findings highlight the need for strengthening HIV-positive mother's self-efficacy for improved uptake of HEID services.


Subject(s)
Early Diagnosis , HIV Infections , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Mothers , Humans , Tanzania , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/psychology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Infant , Mothers/psychology , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Young Adult , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Male , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Logistic Models , Pregnancy
4.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e56957, 2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The war in Syria has displaced over 6.8 million people, more than any other conflict since the Second World War. As a result, Syrian asylum seekers and refugees have experienced several life-changing events, resulting in high rates of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidal ideation (SI). To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI developed for general populations was culturally adapted for and with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study revealed the importance of understanding their lived experience with migration and the acculturative process in providing treatment for SI. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted intervention for this population. OBJECTIVE: The first phase of the study will include recruiting participants and delivering the web-based intervention (1) to assess the feasibility of meeting recruitment goals and recruitment rates and (2) to assess the feasibility of outcome measures. The second phase of the study will include one-to-one semistructured interviews (1) to assess the suitability of the culturally adapted intervention in terms of recruitment and adherence rates and barriers and facilitators to engagement and (2) to assess the acceptability of the intervention in terms of its cultural relevance and appropriateness. METHODS: This is a protocol for a single-group, noncontrolled, mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study of a culturally adapted web-based intervention to reduce SI for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. The study will assess the feasibility of recruitment goals, recruitment rates, adherence rates, and outcome measures using individual participant tracking forms, which will be analyzed quantitatively. The suitability and acceptability of the intervention will be assessed using one-to-one semistructured interviews with 12 participants who completed the intervention, which will be analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Recruitment began in February 2024 and will run until 30 participants are recruited to the study or until the end of July 2024. Thus far, 19 participants have provided informed consent, 16 were eligible and enrolled, and 12 have completed a postintervention interview. No data have been analyzed. The study, including the write-up period, is expected to end in December 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Despite experiencing several stressors related to forced displacement and high rates of mental health issues, access to treatment is still limited for Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. To address the treatment gap and reduce the burden of help-seeking, a web-based intervention to reduce SI was culturally adapted in collaboration with Syrian asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom. This study will now assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and culturally appropriate recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN11417025; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11417025. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/56957.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Internet-Based Intervention , Refugees , Suicidal Ideation , Humans , Refugees/psychology , United Kingdom , Syria/ethnology , Male , Female , Adult , Culturally Competent Care , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology
5.
Reprod Health ; 21(1): 126, 2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improving maternal healthcare services is crucial to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG-3), which aims to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity. There is a consensus among different researchers that proper utilization of maternal healthcare services can improve the reproductive health of women, and this can be achieved by providing Antenatal Care (ANC) during pregnancy, Health Facility Delivery (HFD), and Postnatal Care (PNC) to all pregnant women. The main aim of this study was to investigate the utilization and factors associated with maternal and child healthcare services among women of reproductive age in the pastoralist communities in Kenya. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 180 pastoralist women who gave birth in the past two years across ten mobile villages in Marsabit County between 2nd January and 29th February 2019. Three key outcomes were analyzed, whether they attended ANC 4+ visits, delivered at HF, and received PNC. Pearson χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted by IBM SPSS27.0 following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 180 eligible pastoralist women (mean age 27.44 ± 5.13 years), 92.2% were illiterate, 93.9% were married, 33.3% were in polygamy, and 14.4% had mobile phones. The median commuting distance was 15.00 (10-74) km, 41.7% attended ANC 4+, 33.3% HFD, and 42.8% PNC. Those women residing close (≤ 15 km) to a health facility had a threefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47-6.53), 2.8-fold higher HFD (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.34-5.84), and 2.5-fold higher PNC (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.19-5.22) probability. The likelihood was 30-fold higher for ANC 4+ (OR 29.88, 95% CI 6.68-133.62), 2.5-fold higher for HFD (OR 2.56, 95% CI 0.99-6.63), and 60-fold higher for PNC (OR 60.46, 95% CI 10.43-350.55) in women with mobile phones. A monogamous marriage meant a fivefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 5.17, 95% CI 1.88-14.23), 1.6-fold higher HFD (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.77-3.62), and a sevenfold higher PNC (OR 7.05, 95% CI 2.35-21.19) likelihood. Hosmer Lemeshow test indicated a good-fitting model for ANC 4+, HFD, and PNC (p = 0.790, p = 0.441, p = 0.937, respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the utilization of three essential maternal health services is low. Geographic proximity, monogamous marriage, and possession of mobile phones were significant predictors. Therefore, it is recommended that stakeholders take the initiative to bring this service closer to the pastoralist community by providing mobile health outreach and health education.


Attending maternal healthcare clinics is essential to reduce maternal deaths and infections. This can be achieved by receiving antenatal care, delivering at health facilities, and checkups after delivery. We investigated the utilization and factors associated with maternal and child healthcare services among pastoralist women of reproductive age who have given birth in the past two years. Of one hundred and eighty women who participated, most of them were illiterate; the majority were married, of which almost a quarter were in polygamous marriages. This population's uptake of antenatal care, delivery in health facilities, and checkups after delivery is low. This means, that walking distance to the health facility was more than 15 km, almost half of women attended antenatal care and received checkups after delivery but only thirty-three percent delivered at a health facility. Geographic proximity, monogamy, and possession of mobile phones for communication were significant in determining the usage of maternal health care. Living close to a health facility means almost three times more antenatal care, two times more health facility delivery, and checkups after delivery. Women with mobile phones showed twenty-seven more times chances to attend antenatal care, more than four times chances to deliver in a health facility and sixty times more chances of having checkups after delivery. Monogamous marriage showed five times higher odds to attend ANC 4+ visits, and seven times having checkups after delivery. Therefore, it is recommended that stakeholders take the initiative to bring this service closer to the pastoralist community.


Subject(s)
Maternal Health Services , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Prenatal Care , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Kenya , Adult , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent
6.
Trials ; 25(1): 579, 2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223604

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite Africa's significant infectious disease burden, it is underrepresented in global vaccine clinical trials. While this trend is slowly reversing, it is important to recognize and mitigate the challenges that arise when conducting vaccine clinical trials in this environment. These challenges stem from a variety of factors peculiar to the population and may negatively impact adverse event collection and reporting if not properly addressed. METHODS: As a team of clinical researchers working within the MRCG (Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia), we have conducted 12 phase 1 to 3 vaccine trials over the past 10 years. In this article, we discuss the challenges we face and the strategies we have developed to improve the collection and reporting of adverse events in low-income settings. OUTCOME: Healthcare-seeking behaviors in the Gambia are influenced by spiritual and cultural beliefs as well as barriers to accessing orthodox healthcare; participants in trials may resort to non-orthodox care, reducing the accuracy of reported adverse events. To address this, trial eligibility criteria prohibit self-treatment and herbal product use during trials. Instead, round-the-clock care is provided to trial participants, facilitating safety follow-up. Constraints in the healthcare system in the Gambia such as limitations in diagnostic tools limit the specificity of diagnosis when reporting adverse events. To overcome these challenges, the Medical Research Council Unit maintains a Clinical Services Department, offering medical care and diagnostic services to study participants. Sociocultural factors, including low literacy rates and social influences, impact adverse event collection. Solicited adverse events are collected during home visits on paper-based or electronic report forms. Community engagement meetings are held before each study starts to inform community stakeholders about the study and answer any questions they may have. These meetings ensure that influential members of the community understand the purpose of the study and the risks and benefits of participating in the trial. This understanding makes them more likely to support participation within their communities. CONCLUSION: Conducting ethical vaccine clinical trials in resource-limited settings requires strategies to accurately collect and report adverse events. Our experiences from the Gambia offer insights into adverse event collection in these settings.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Poverty , Vaccines , Humans , Gambia , Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Research Design , Patient Safety , Cultural Characteristics , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Research Subjects/psychology , Risk Factors , Developing Countries
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 20341, 2024 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39242754

ABSTRACT

Administering the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to men offers substantial health benefits for both themselves and their female partners. In mainland China, the HPV vaccine has not been approved for men, and little is known about their acceptance of it. This study aims to assess the acceptability of HPV vaccine among young Chinese adult men and examine the association between personal health beliefs, altruistic beliefs, and HPV vaccination intentions and behavioral attempts. A cross-sectional study was conducted among male university students using a multistage cluster sampling method in eight universities across five districts in Zhejiang Province, China. Data were collected from December 2020 to January 2021 using a self-administered, anonymous online questionnaire. Of the 1937 participants, 1009 who had heard of the HPV vaccine completed the questionnaire. Over one-third (40.4%, 408/1009) had high levels of HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge. A total of 695 of 1009 (68.9%) expressed an intention to receive the HPV vaccine when available, and 329 of 1009 (32.6%) had proactively inquired about male HPV vaccination. Perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived gender barriers, and perceived benefits of male HPV vaccination for female partner were associated with HPV vaccination intentions. Lower perceived vaccine barriers, greater perceived benefits, and stronger vaccination intentions were associated with higher HPV behavioral attempts. There is an emerging demand for HPV vaccinations among young adult men in mainland China. Personal health beliefs and altruistic beliefs are crucial in promoting young adult men's acceptance of the HPV vaccine. Emphasizing both male-specific benefits and altruistic motivations may enhance HPV vaccine acceptability among young adult men.


Subject(s)
Altruism , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Male , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Young Adult , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Infections/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Adult , Adolescent , Vaccination/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Female , East Asian People
8.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 1111, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Risk-stratified approaches to breast screening show promise for increasing benefits and reducing harms. But the successful implementation of such an approach will rely on public acceptability. To date, research suggests that while increased screening for women at high risk will be acceptable, any de-intensification of screening for low-risk groups may be met with less enthusiasm. We report findings from a population-based survey of women in England, approaching the age of eligibility for breast screening, to compare the acceptability of current age-based screening with two hypothetical risk-adapted approaches for women at low risk of breast cancer. METHODS: An online survey of 1,579 women aged 40-49 with no personal experience of breast cancer or mammography. Participants were recruited via a market research panel, using target quotas for educational attainment and ethnic group, and were randomised to view information about (1) standard NHS age-based screening; (2) a later screening start age for low-risk women; or (3) a longer screening interval for low-risk women. Primary outcomes were cognitive, emotional, and global acceptability. ANOVAs and multiple regression were used to compare acceptability between groups and explore demographic and psychosocial factors associated with acceptability. RESULTS: All three screening approaches were judged to be acceptable on the single-item measure of global acceptability (mean score > 3 on a 5-point scale). Scores for all three measures of acceptability were significantly lower for the risk-adapted scenarios than for age-based screening. There were no differences between the two risk-adapted scenarios. In multivariable analysis, higher breast cancer knowledge was positively associated with cognitive and emotional acceptability of screening approach. Willingness to undergo personal risk assessment was not associated with experimental group. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in the acceptability of later start age vs. longer screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer in a large sample of women who were screening naïve. Although acceptability of both risk-adapted scenarios was lower than for standard age-based screening, overall acceptability was reasonable. The positive associations between knowledge and both cognitive and emotional acceptability suggests clear and reassuring communication about the rationale for de-intensified screening may enhance acceptability.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Middle Aged , Adult , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/psychology , Mammography/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/psychology , England/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods
9.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2427, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) for the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) have shifted the World Health Organisation global strategic focus to the elimination of HCV by 2030. In England, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) led a national 'patient re-engagement exercise', using routine surveillance data, which was delivered through the HCV Operational Delivery Networks (ODNs) with support from National Health Service England (NHSE), to help find and support people with a positive HCV PCR test result to access treatment. We report a quantitative evaluation of outcomes of this exercise. METHODS: Individuals with a recorded positive HCV antibody or PCR result between 1996 and 2017 were identified using UKHSA's records of HCV laboratory diagnosis. Linkage with established health-care datasets helped to enhance patient identification and minimise attempts to contact deceased or previously treated individuals. From September to November 2018 each ODN was provided with a local list of diagnosed individuals. ODNs were asked to perform further data quality checks through local systems and then write to each individual's GP to inform them that the individual would be contacted by the ODN to offer confirmatory HCV PCR testing, assessment and treatment unless the GP advised otherwise. Outcomes of interest were receipt of treatment, a negative PCR result, and death. Data were collected in 2022. RESULTS: Of 176,555 individuals with a positive HCV laboratory report, 55,329 individuals were included in the exercise following linkage to healthcare datasets and data reconciliation. Participants in the study had a median age of 51 years (IQR: 43, 59), 36,779 (66.5%) were males, 47,668 (86.2%) were diagnosed before 2016 and 11,148 (20.2%) lived in London. Of the study population, 7,442 (13.4%) had evidence of treatment after the re-engagement exercise commenced, 6,435 (11.6%) were reported as PCR negative (96% had no previous treatment records), 4,195 (7.6%) had prescription data indicating treatment before the exercise commenced or were reported to have been treated previously by their ODN, and 2,990 (5.4%) had died. The status of 32,802 (59.3%) people remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of those included had treatment recorded after the exercise commenced, however, many more remain unengaged. Evaluation of the exercise highlighted areas that could be streamlined to improve future exercises.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Humans , Male , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , England/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 1035, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many patients with post COVID-19 condition (PCC) require healthcare services. However, qualitative studies indicate that patients with PCC encounter many barriers to healthcare access. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine how many PCC patients report barriers to healthcare access and which barriers are reported, and to explore differences between subgroups. METHODS: Data were collected via an online survey from 10,462 adult patients with a confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection in the Netherlands, who experienced persisting symptoms ≥ 3 months after the initial infection. To study self-perceived barriers, a list of eleven possible barriers was used, covering multiple aspects of healthcare access. Differences between subgroups based on sociodemographic characteristics, medical characteristics, PCC symptoms (fatigue, dyspnoea, cognitive problems, anxiety and depression), and healthcare use (general practitioner, paramedical professional, medical specialist, occupational physician and mental health professional) were studied through multivariable multinomial (0 vs. 1 vs. > 1 barrier) and binomial regression analyses (for each individual barrier). RESULTS: A total of 83.2% of respondents reported at least one barrier to healthcare access. Respondents reported a median of 2.0 (IQR = 3.0) barriers. The barriers "I didn't know who to turn to for help" (50.9%) and "No one with the right knowledge/skills was available" (36.8%) were most frequently reported. Respondents with younger age, higher educational level, not hospitalized during acute COVID-19 infection, longer disease duration, who had more severe PCC symptoms, and who did not consult an occupational physician or paramedical professional, were more likely to report barriers. Analyses per barrier showed that women were more likely to report financial and help-seeking barriers, while men were more likely to report barriers related to availability of care. Hospitalized respondents were less likely to report barriers related to availability of care, but not less likely to report financial or help-seeking barriers. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the majority of patients with PCC experiences barriers to healthcare access. Particular attention should be paid to younger, non-hospitalized patients with a long disease duration and severe PCC symptoms. Efforts to remove barriers should focus not only on improving availability of care, but also on helping patients navigate care pathways.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Netherlands , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Young Adult
11.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 495, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, with a high mortality rate in developing countries, including sub-Saharan Africa. Screening is one way to ensure early detection and management of breast cancer, and it is influenced by several factors. Education and socio-economic status may also affect the utilization of breast cancer screening services as these impact decision-making. This study aimed to investigate women's empowerment and its influence on the uptake of breast cancer screening among women in Tanzania. METHODS: This study utilized the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey data, and included 4216 women aged 20 to 49 years. Women empowerment variables used include social independence, decision-making, ownership of assets, and attitude towards violence. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26 was used for data cleaning and analysis. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were done, including a multivariate logistic regression to assess the level of association between independent variables with breast cancer screening. RESULTS: Findings indicate that the prevalence of breast cancer screening is 5.2%. Age, education level, literacy, ownership of assets, attitude towards violence, and decision making are associated with ever going for breast cancer screening. Women aged 45 to 49 years (AOR = 6.28, 95% CI = 6.27-6.28), those with secondary or higher education (AOR 1.1, 95% CI = 1.05-1.06), literate women (AOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.13-1.13), those who own a house (AOR = 3.08, 95% CI = 3.08-3.09), who jointly decide on their healthcare with partners on healthcare (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.18-1.19) had significantly higher odds of going for breast cancer screening. CONCLUSION: Women's empowerment is significantly associated with the likelihood of engaging in breast cancer screening. Empowered women are more likely to undergo screening. Focus should be on empowering women through education, businesses, and community involvement. Country-specific interventions and breast cancer screening awareness campaigns should include empowerment initiatives to promote screening uptake.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Empowerment , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Tanzania/epidemiology , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Young Adult , Health Surveys , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Decision Making , Socioeconomic Factors
12.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 19(1): 324, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) often face delayed diagnoses, limited treatment options and high healthcare costs, that may significantly affect patients' quality of life. The objective of this study was to understand medical service utilization related to diagnosis and treatment, economic burden during diagnosis period, and health-related quality of life among MPS patients in China. METHODS: A series of patients diagnosed with MPS registered in the national patient organization were recruited for a cross-sectional survey from May to July 2019. Information were collected from patients or their parents via phone interview, including demographic data, utilization of services related to diagnosis and treatment, total cost during the period of MPS diagnosis and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL was assessed by PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL) and 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) depending on the age of patients with MPS and compared with the general Chinese population. RESULTS: A total of 180 MPS patients (50, 67, 15, 46, 1 and 1 for type I, II, III, IV, VI and VII), with a mean age of 9.54 years and 137 (76.11%) males, were included in analysis. The mean age at first visit to a medical doctor for MPS related symptoms was 3.65 ± 2.58 years old, while only 12 patients (6.67%) were diagnosed on their first visit. The mean diagnostic delay, which is defined as the time between the first visit to a medical doctor for MPS related symptoms and the final diagnosis, was 9.42 months, with no significant difference between types. The average number of misdiagnosis was 4.56. Before the confirmed diagnosis, the patients made an average of 6.31 visits and visited 4.3 hospitals. During diagnosis period, the mean of ¥81,086.72 direct medical costs accounted for 63.75% of the total cost. Only 32.78% of the patients had ever received specific treatments. The mean scores of PedsQL and SF-36 of patients were significantly lower than the Chinese norms. Household annual income per person, specific treatment use and MPS subtype were significantly associated HRQoL of patients. CONCLUSION: The results highlight challenges faced by MPS patients in terms of diagnosis, access to specific treatments, economic burden and low HRQoL. There is an urgent need to improve early detection and diagnosis, create fair and consistent mechanisms to increase access to specialized treatment and reduce the economic burden of MPS patients in China.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Mucopolysaccharidoses , Quality of Life , Humans , China , Male , Mucopolysaccharidoses/economics , Female , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Adult , Young Adult , Infant , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 1034, 2024 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243098

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has made strides in reducing maternal mortality, but significant discrepancies in maternal health service utilization exist across socioeconomic levels. According to studies, women from higher-income households are far more likely to use essential services such as antenatal care, delivery care, and postnatal care than poorer women. This wealth disparity is a primary contributor to persistently high maternal mortality, particularly among poor populations. The study's goal was to assess wealth disparities in maternal health service uptake and identify contributing factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the Ethiopian Mini Demographic Health Survey (EMDHS), conducted in 2019 on women aged 15-49 living in selected census areas, with a weighted sample size of 3,909. The Erreygers Concentration Index (ECI) was used to measure wealth inequalities in maternal health care, and the ECI decomposition was used to identify factors contributing to inequality in maternal health services. RESULTS: Maternal health service utilization was pro-rich among women in Ethiopia. The prevalence of antenatal care service (ANC), delivery, and postnatal care (PNC) service utilization showed a pro-rich distribution among Ethiopian women, with ECI = 0.115 (95% CI: 0.091-0.137), ECI = 0.223 (95% CI: 0.191-0.276), and ECI = 0.121 (95% CI: 0.041-0.200), respectively. The ECI indices were decomposed to examine the contributing factors to disparities in maternal service utilization in Ethiopia. Mother's current age, household family size, region, birth order, and parity were contributors to maternal health service utilization. CONCLUSION: The ANC service, delivery service and PNC service utilization showed a pro-rich distribution among Ethiopian women. Mother's current age, household family size, region, birth order, and parity are important contributors of maternal health service inequality. To improve access and usage among low-income women, policymakers can develop programs including increasing the number of free or subsidized services and providing transportation.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Maternal Health Services , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , Female , Ethiopia , Adult , Maternal Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data
14.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2418, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Population mail-out bowel cancer screening programs save lives through prevention and early detection; however, their effectiveness is constrained by low participation rates. Many non-participants are "intenders"; that is, they intend to screen but fail to do so, often forgetting or procrastinating. This study aimed to co-design interventions to increase screening participation among intenders in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. METHODS: Three semi-structured interviews, and one online cross-sectional survey, were conducted between August 2021 and December 2022. Interviews with people who had completed and returned their latest screening kit ("completers") were first conducted to identify the planning strategies they had used. Using survey data, logistic regressions were conducted to analyse strategies predictive of participants having returned their latest bowel cancer screening kit. Then, intenders were interviewed to explore their opinions of these strategies and worked with researchers to adapt these strategies into prototype interventions to facilitate screening participation. All interviews were analysed using the framework approach of codebook thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interview participants who returned their kit shared their effective planning strategies, such as putting the kit in a visible place or by the toilet, planning a time at home to complete the kit, and using reminders. Survey participants who reported using such strategies were more likely to have completed their screening kit compared to those who did not. Prototype interventions developed and endorsed by intenders included providing a prompt to place the kit or a sticker near the toilet as a reminder, a deadline for kit return, the option to sign up for reminders, and a bag to store the sample in the fridge. CONCLUSIONS: These novel, consumer-led interventions that are built upon the needs and experience of screening invitees provide potential solutions to improve participation in population bowel cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Postal Service , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Interviews as Topic , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology
15.
Syst Rev ; 13(1): 227, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates are particularly vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). These VPDs are associated with high morbidity and mortality among expectant mothers and their fetuses and neonates. Vaccination during pregnancy can protect the expectant mother from VPDs to which she may be especially vulnerable while pregnant. In addition, the passive transfer of maternal neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) also protects the fetus against congenital infections and may further protect the neonate from infection during the first few months of life. Despite this, coverage of recommended maternal vaccines remains suboptimal globally, especially in resource-constrained settings. Determinants of vaccine acceptance and uptake are frequently understudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and among specific groups such as pregnant and postpartum women. This proposed systematic review will assess the acceptance and uptake of vaccines against tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 among pregnant and postpartum women in LMICs. METHODS: A Boolean search strategy employing common and medical subject heading (MeSH) terms for tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 vaccines, as well as vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, together with uptake, pregnancy, and postpartum, will be used to search electronic databases for relevant literature published between 2009 and 2024. Only studies conducted in LMICs that investigated determinants of acceptance, hesitancy, and uptake of tetanus, influenza, pertussis, and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant and postpartum women will be eligible for inclusion in the review. The quality and the risk of bias of all eligible full-text articles will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) critical appraisal tools. DISCUSSION: This protocol proposes a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to assess the uptake of maternal vaccines and to systematically appraise and quantify determinants of the acceptance and uptake of recommended vaccines during pregnancy and postpartum in LMICs. A better understanding of these factors and how they influence maternal vaccine decision-making will enable public health practitioners as well as global and national policymakers to design more effective interventions as we look towards expanding the scope and reach of maternal immunization programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Developing Countries , Influenza, Human , Meta-Analysis as Topic , SARS-CoV-2 , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Tetanus , Whooping Cough , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Tetanus/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Vaccination/psychology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Influenza Vaccines
16.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 22(1): 124, 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237974

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sub-optimal community health service delivery (CHSD) has been a challenge constraining community health systems (CHS) globally, especially in developing countries such as Nigeria. This paper examined the key factors that either enhance or constrain CHSD in Nigeria at the individual, community/facility and governmental levels while recommending evidence-based solutions for sustaining and improving CHSD within the framework of CHS. METHODS: Data were collected through a qualitative study undertaken in three states (Anambra, Akwa-Ibom and Kano) in Nigeria. Respondents were formal/informal health providers, community leaders and representatives of civil society organizations all purposively sampled. There were 90 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using codes to identify key themes. RESULTS: Factors constraining community health service delivery at the individual level were poor health-seeking behaviour, preference for quacks and male dominance of service delivery; at the community/facility level were superstitious/cultural beliefs and poor attitude of facility workers; at the governmental level were inadequate financial support, embezzlement of funds and inadequate social amenities. Conversely, the enabling factors at the individual level were community members' participation and the compassionate attitude of informal providers. At the community and facility levels, the factors that enhanced service delivery were synergy between formal and informal providers and support from community-based organizations and structures. At the governmental level, the enhancing factors were the government's support of community-based formal/informal providers and a clear line of communication. CONCLUSIONS: Community health service delivery through a functional community-health system can improve overall health systems strengthening and lead to improved community health. Policy-makers should integrate community health service delivery in all program implementation and ultimately work with the community health system as a veritable platform for effective community health service delivery.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Delivery of Health Care , Focus Groups , Qualitative Research , Humans , Nigeria , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Male , Female , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Community Health Workers/organization & administration , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel , Developing Countries , Health Services Accessibility , Middle Aged , Government
17.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(5 (Supple-5)): S55-S58, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39221801

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyse the factors related to the use of provider-initiated test and counselling services for inmates at high risk of HIV /AIDS. METHODS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Polyclinic of Class IIA Abepura Correctional Institution, Papua Province, Indonesia, from November to December 2020, and involved 140 inmates, of age 18 years or older selected by simple random sampling technique, at high risk of HIV after obtaining informed consent. All had been tested for HIV status were fluent in Indonesian and willing to participate in the study. The use of provider-initiated testing and counselling services was recorded in 112 (80%) cases. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire exploring aspects related to testing and counselling. Data were analysed using SPSS v.21. RESULTS: The association between use of provider-initiated testing and counselling services and acceptance of HIV/AIDSrelated stigma and discrimination was significant (odds ratio=20.781; p<0.001). The association between use of provider-initiated testing and counselling services was also significant with belief in its usefulness (odds ratio=12.372; p<0.001), family and institutional support (odds ratio = 9.993; p<0.001), need for services (odds ratio = 6.587; p<0.001), and knowledge of services (odds ratio = 6.130; p<0.001). Conclusion: It is essential to build a cross-programme collaboration between health workers and security officers in the form of regular counselling to reduce the stigma and discrimination among inmates.


Subject(s)
Counseling , HIV Infections , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Humans , Counseling/methods , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Male , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Indonesia , Female , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Social Stigma , HIV Testing/methods , HIV Testing/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/psychology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/diagnosis
18.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 2024: 7696410, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39229363

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently included in the United Kingdom routine antenatal screening program, but the latest guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend HCV screening for all pregnant women during each pregnancy. The aim of this study was to collect qualitative data on the feasibility and acceptability of antenatal HCV screening in pregnant women at the time of routine antenatal screening at 12 weeks, to estimate patient knowledge about HCV and identify the prevalence of HCV infection in antenatal women. Methods: This was a pilot study targeting a single hospital-based antenatal clinic in Birmingham, initially conducted for eight weeks with a further extension of the study period to enhance recruitment to meet the feasibility target of 500 patients. Data collected included demographic and epidemiological details. Pregnant women attending the antenatal unit were given information regarding HCV and antenatal screening for HCV prior to their initial antenatal visit. During the antenatal visit, research nurses provided further information about the study and HCV infection. Consent was obtained for taking part in the study and testing for HCV using blood samples taken at the same time as other routine antenatal screening blood tests. All women who agreed to participate in the study were asked to complete an acceptability and knowledge questionnaire. All women had HCV antibody testing as the primary screening assay. The test result was communicated in writing to the women and their general practitioner. Confirmatory positive antibody tests were followed up with quantitative HCV PCR and genotype analysis. The outcomes of testing were no evidence of HCV infection and evidence of past HCV infection or current HCV infection. Results: Five hundred and forty-nine women were approached in the antenatal clinic; 30 women refused consent while 29 women were excluded from the study (blood tests not performed after consenting, age less than 18 years, and consent form lost). Four hundred and ninety women were included in the study. The median age of the study population was 29 years (range, 18-46). Knowledge about blood-borne viruses was limited; 75% of women had some understanding about antenatal hepatitis B (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. Previous awareness about hepatitis C was reported by 55%. Ninety-one percent of women found the information they were given about hepatitis C helpful. Ninety-six percent of the women included in this study found the counselling they received about HCV useful and felt that the delivery of this information was carried out in an acceptable manner. Once given information about HCV, 99% felt that universal screening for HCV should be implemented. HCV antibody was negative in 489 women. One patient with a positive HCV antibody (prevalence: 0.2%) had a negative HCV PCR. Conclusion: Routine antenatal screening for HCV is not currently recommended in the UK. Our study suggests that antenatal HCV screening would be both feasible and acceptable to most pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Though the awareness of HCV was low, with appropriate counselling and communication, 99% of pregnant women were in favor of antenatal screening for HCV. Antenatal screening would identify HCV-positive mothers and allow follow-up of their infants so that any infected mothers and infants could be offered effective curative therapy and prevent the progression of liver disease. The inclusion of HCV antenatal screening would complete the blood-borne virus profile and enhance the WHO target to eliminate HCV in the UK.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hepatitis C , Mass Screening , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Pilot Projects , Adult , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/methods , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/methods , Hepacivirus/isolation & purification , Hepacivirus/genetics , Young Adult , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Am J Public Health ; 114(10): 1086-1096, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39231413

ABSTRACT

Objectives. To analyze War on Drugs encounters and their relationships to health care utilization among White people who use drugs (PWUD) in 22 Appalachian rural counties in Kentucky, West Virginia, Ohio, and North Carolina. Methods. We recruited White PWUD using chain referral sampling in 2018 to 2020. Surveys asked about criminal-legal encounters, unmet health care needs, and other covariates. We used generalized estimating equations to regress unmet need on criminal-legal encounters in multivariable models. Results. In this sample (n = 957), rates of stop and search, arrest, incarceration, and community supervision were high (44.0%, 26.8%, 36.3%, and 31.1%, respectively), as was unmet need (68.5%). Criminal-legal encounters were unrelated to unmet need (stops: adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97, 1.32; arrest: APR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.15; incarceration: APR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.89, 1.14; community supervision: APR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.09). Conclusions. Contrasting with findings from predominantly Black urban areas, criminal-legal encounters and unmet need were unrelated among White Appalachian PWUD. Research should explore whether and under what conditions White supremacy's benefits might buffer adverse impacts of the War on Drugs in Appalachia. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1086-1096. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307744).


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Rural Population , Substance-Related Disorders , White People , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Appalachian Region , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Racism/statistics & numerical data , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 1022, 2024 Sep 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39232754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mobile Integrated Health-Community Paramedicine (MIH-CP) is a novel approach that may reduce the rural-urban disparity in vaccination uptake in the United States. MIH-CP providers, as physician extenders, offer clinical follow-up and wrap-around services in homes and communities, uniquely positioning them as trusted messengers and vaccine providers. This study explores stakeholder perspectives on feasibility and acceptability of community paramedicine vaccination programs. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with leaders of paramedicine agencies with MIH-CP, without MIH-CP, and state/regional leaders in Indiana. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 24 individuals who represented EMS organizations with MIH-CP programs (MIH-CP; n = 10), EMS organizations without MIH-CP programs (non-MIH-CP; n = 9), and state/regional administrators (SRA; n = 5). Overall, the sample included professionals with an average of 19.6 years in the field (range: 1-42 years). Approximately 75% (n = 14) were male, and all identified as non-Hispanic white. MIH-CPs reported they initiated a vaccine program to reach underserved areas, operating as a health department extension. Some MIH-CPs integrated existing services, such as food banks, with vaccine clinics, while other MIH-CPs focused on providing vaccinations as standalone initiatives. Key barriers to vaccination program initiation included funding and vaccinations being a low priority for MIH-CP programs. However, participants reported support for vaccine programs, particularly as they provided an opportunity to alleviate health disparities and improve community health. MIH-CPs reported low vaccine hesitancy in the community when community paramedics administered vaccines. Non-CP agencies expressed interest in launching vaccine programs if there is clear guidance, sustainable funding, and adequate personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides important context on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an MIH-CP program. Findings offer valuable insights into reducing health disparities seen in vaccine uptake through community paramedics, a novel and innovative approach to reduce health disparities in rural communities.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Qualitative Research , Humans , Male , Female , Interviews as Topic , Indiana , Adult , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/psychology , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Community Health Services/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Paramedicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL