RESUMEN
Data from Turkey revealed that atrial fibrillation patient percentage under adequate anti- coagulation in Turkey is less than that in other countries due to multiple parameters such as treatment adherence problems, failure to follow guideline recommendations, negative perspective on the use of new drugs, drug costs, and payment conditions. The aim of this article is to provide physicians with a compiled resource that focuses on the differences between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and heterogeneity of atrial fibrilla- tion patients by reviewing the global and national data from a multidisciplinary perspective and provide guidance on the choice of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients. A gastroenterologist, 2 neurologists, and 11 cardiologists from university and training and research hospitals in Turkey who are experienced in atrial fibrillation and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments gathered in 3 separate meetings to identify the review topics and evaluate the outcomes of the systematic literature search. Based on the pharmacological characteristics, clinical studies, and real-world data compari- sons, it has been revealed that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are not similar. Thromboembolism and bleeding risks, renal and hepatic functions, coexisting conditions, and concomitant drug usage have been shown to affect the levels of benefits gained from non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients. Although Turkish patients with atrial fibrillation have been observed to be younger, they are more likely to have coexisting cardiovascular conditions compared to the atrial fibrillation patients in other countries. Selection of an appropriate non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in line with the available evidence and recent guidelines will provide substantial benefits to atrial fibrillation patients.