Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Agri ; 36(3): 202-205, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985106

RESUMEN

Osteitis pubis (OP) is a rare, inflammatory disorder that affects the pubic bone, symphysis, and adjacent structures. OP is reported after urological and gynecological surgeries and documented in athletes. OP is a self-limiting condition, but sometimes symptoms may persist for a long time. Conservative modalities are generally able to treat OP. Here we report a patient treated with a steroid injection under fluoroscopy guidance. A 63-year-old male patient developed pelvic pain after prostate surgery, and the pain was intractable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. He underwent a steroid injection under fluoroscopy, and his pain affecting daily living activities and walking was eased for three months.


Asunto(s)
Osteítis , Dolor Pélvico , Hueso Púbico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fluoroscopía , Osteítis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Esteroides/administración & dosificación , Esteroides/uso terapéutico
2.
Agri ; 36(1): 38-44, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38239116

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) is one of the most common causes of neuropathic pain. This pain often arises from inflammation in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) or spinal nerves. Despite various treatment modalities, success rates are not very high in chronic LRP cases. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) therapy, frequently applied to the DRG, is widely used, but its effectiveness is often questioned in various studies. The primary aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PRF treatment in 154 patients. METHODS: Patients with LRP for longer than 3 months, treated with PRF, were included in this study. To assess the efficacy of PRF treatment, numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were evaluated at the 4th-week and 6th-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The NRS scores were significantly lower at the 4th-week and 6th-month follow-ups compared to pre-treatment levels (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the mean NRS scores at the 4th week and 6th month. CONCLUSION: Success in interventional pain procedures is often considered as at least a 50% reduction in pain scores. The success rate for PRF treatment for LRP in the literature varies between 30% and 60%, which is similar to our findings at the 4th week and 6th month. PRF treatment is widely used due to its low side-effect profile and cost-effectiveness in the long term. There is no fully standardized practice regarding procedural aspects, such as the duration of the application, and prospective studies with larger participation are needed.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/efectos adversos , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Neuralgia/etiología , Ganglios Espinales , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA