Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Birth ; 51(1): 152-162, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37800388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the National University Hospital of Iceland (NUHI) merged a mixed-risk birth unit and a midwifery-led low-risk unit into one mixed-risk unit. Interprofessional preventative and mitigating measures were implemented since there was a known threat of cultural contamination between mixed-risk and low-risk birth environments. The aim of the study was to assess whether the NUHI's goal of protecting the rates of birth without intervention had been achieved and to support further development of labor services. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who had singleton births at NUHI birth units in two 2-year periods, 2012-2013 and 2015-2016. The primary outcome variables, birth without intervention, with or without artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), were adjusted for confounding variables using logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcome variables (individual interventions and maternal and neonatal complications) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t test, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: The rate of births without interventions, both with and without AROM, increased significantly after the unit merger and accompanying preventative measures. The rates of AROM, oxytocin augmentation, episiotomies, and epidural analgesia decreased significantly. The rate of induction increased significantly. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional preventative measures, implemented alongside a mixed-risk and low-risk birth unit merger, can increase rates of births without interventions in a mixed-risk hospital setting. However, it is necessary to maintain awareness of the possible effects of a mixed-risk birth environment on the use of childbirth interventions and examine the long-term effects of preventative measures.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Partería , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Natalidad , Islandia , Hospitales
2.
Eur J Midwifery ; 6: 16, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35434536

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Theoretical models for midwifery have been developed in different countries, but few have been evaluated. This study evaluated the implementation of a midwifery model of woman-centered care (MiMo) in practice. METHODS: A mixed method study based on an implementation of MiMo was carried out in a labor ward at a university hospital in Sweden, with another labor ward as a reference. The qualitative core component was a secondary analysis of focus groups with midwives after the implementation. The supplemental quantitative components were oxytocin use for augmentation of labor and women's childbirth experiences before and after the implementation. RESULTS: The midwives viewed MiMo as a useful tool for comprehending the birthing woman holistically, and for identifying what might disturb the birth process. Hindering factors were a lack of organizational stability and time, and midwives' unwillingness to understand the model. Oxytocin use decreased significantly only in the implementation ward (p=0.002) and a significant difference was found between wards in the post-implementation period (p=0.004). However, logistic regression analyses showed that the interaction between ward and time period, controlling for age, epidural use, and birth outcome, was not significant (p=0.304), indicating that the decrease was not significantly related to the implementation. Childbirth experience did not differ before and after the implementation. CONCLUSIONS: By using MiMo in practice, midwives have a tool for comprehending the woman holistically and identifying disturbing factors during the birth. However, more research is needed for further implementation that should focus on the potential as well as hindering factors.

3.
Women Birth ; 34(2): 122-127, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32057663

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: There is a knowledge gap regarding women's experiences of coping with labour pain when not soliciting or not having access to pharmacological pain relief. BACKGROUND: How women manage labour pain is complex, multifaceted and only the woman giving birth can assess the experienced pain. Women in the Nordic countries planning for a homebirth have little or no access to pharmacologic pain relief during labour. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore how women experience and work with labour pain when giving birth in their own home. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data was prospectively collected and altogether 1649 women with a planned homebirth answered closed and open-ended questions about labour pain and birth experience. RESULTS: While labour pain was often experienced as positive or very positive, the intensity was experienced as severe or the worst imaginable pain. Two main themes arose from the womens´ descriptions of their birth experience regarding labour pain: An encounter with extremes and Being in charge at home. DISCUSSION: Women perceived labour pain as severe but manageable and were dedicated to completing the birth at home. Being at home enabled the women to exercise autonomy and work with labour pain on their own terms, together with the midwife and support persons. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides knowledge about women's experiences of labour pain in a home birth setting who used varying strategies to work with labour pain. This is a subject that should be explored further since results could also apply to facility-based birth settings.


Asunto(s)
Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Femenino , Parto Domiciliario/psicología , Humanos , Partería , Parto , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Women Birth ; 33(1): 60-69, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30686654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Theoretical models as a basis for midwives' care have been developed over recent decades. Although there are similarities between these models, their usefulness in practice needs to be researched in specific cultural contexts. AIM: To explore whether, when adopted by midwives on labour wards, a midwifery model of woman-centred care (MiMo) was useful in practice from the viewpoint of a variety of health professionals. METHODS: Data were collected from a variety of health professionals before and after an intervention of implementating MiMo at a hospital-based labour ward in Sweden, using nine focus group interviews with a total of 43 participants: midwives (n=16), obstetricians (n=8), assistant nurses (n=11) and managers (n=8). The text from interviews was analysed using content analysis. FINDINGS: From expressing no explicit need of a midwifery model of woman-centred care before the intervention, there was a shift in midwives, obstetricians and managers perceptions towards identifying advantages of using the MiMo as it gives words to woman-centred midwifery care. Such shift in perception was not found among the assistant nurses. DISCUSSION: Clarification of the various roles of health professionals is needed to develop the model. Heavy workloads and stress were barriers to implementing the model. Thus, more support is needed from organisational management. CONCLUSIONS: The model was useful for all professional groups, except for assistant nurses. Further studies are needed in order to clarify the various professional roles and interdisciplinary collaborations in making the MiMo more useful in daily maternity care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Partería/métodos , Modelos de Enfermería , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Percepción , Embarazo , Rol Profesional , Suecia
5.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ; 14(1): 1593037, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30924414

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There is a need to deepen knowledge about midwives' care in obstetric-led labour wards in which midwives are responsible for normal births. This ethnographic study explores the content and meaning of midwives' care of women in a hospital-based labour ward in Sweden prior to the introduction of a theoretical midwifery model of care. METHODS: Data were gathered through participant observation, analysed through interpretation grounded in reflexivity discussions and are presented in the form of ethnographic descriptions. RESULTS: The midwives' care was provided in a field of tension in which they had to balance contrasting models of care, described in the themes: The birthing rooms and the office-Different rooms of care, Women giving birth or being delivered-Midwives' expectations and relationships with women, Old and new caring roles of the midwife-Women giving birth in a "new age", Being and doing-Different approaches to caring, and Holistic and reductionist care-Guided by contrasting models and guidelines. The midwives' freedom to act as autonomous professionals was hindered by medical and institutional models of care and this led to uncertainty regarding their roles as midwives. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives having to balance their activities in a field of tension require midwifery models that can guide their practice.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Personal de Salud , Departamentos de Hospitales , Hospitales , Partería , Atención Perinatal/métodos , Adulto , Antropología Cultural , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autonomía Personal , Embarazo , Rol Profesional , Investigación Cualitativa , Suecia
6.
Women Birth ; 31(3): e178-e184, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28943317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain in childbirth has been identified as one of the major components in the childbirth experience and an important topic that needs to be addressed during pregnancy, birth and the after-birth period. AIM: The aim of the study was to describe women's childbirth pain experience and to identify predictors of women's positive childbirth pain experience. METHOD: A population-based cross-sectional cohort study design was implemented, with convenient consecutive sampling, stratified according to residency. Pregnant women were recruited through 26 health care centers. Participants were sent a questionnaire by mail during early pregnancy and another one five to six months after childbirth. A multiple regression analysis was done, with women's childbirth pain experiences as the dependent variable. FINDINGS: Altogether 726 women participated in the study, with a response rate of 68%. The strongest predictors for women's positive childbirth pain experience were positive attitude to childbirth during pregnancy; support from midwife during childbirth; use of epidural analgesia and low intensity of pain in childbirth. DISCUSSION: The majority of the women in the study experienced childbirth pain as a positive experience, which is in line with studies that have demonstrated that pain in childbirth is different from other kinds of pain. In addition to epidural use as a predictor for positive childbirth pain experience, many other strong predictors exist and must be acknowledged. CONCLUSION: When planning pregnancy and childbirth services, predictors of positive experience of childbirth pain should be considered and investigated further.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Dolor de Parto/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Parto/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Islandia , Partería , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 16(1): 196, 2016 07 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27473380

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether certain birth positions are associated with perineal injuries and severe perineal trauma (SPT) is still unclear. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of perineal injuries of different severity in a low-risk population of women who planned to give birth at home and to compare the prevalence of perineal injuries, SPT and episiotomy in different birth positions in four Nordic countries. METHODS: A population-based prospective cohort study of planned home births in four Nordic countries. To assess medical outcomes a questionnaire completed after birth by the attending midwife was used. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred ninety-two women with planned home births, who birthed spontaneously at home or after transfer to hospital, between 2008 and 2013 were included. The prevalence of SPT was 0.7 % and the prevalence of episiotomy was 1.0 %. There were differences between the countries regarding all maternal characteristics. No association between flexible sacrum positions and sutured perineal injuries was found (OR 1.02; 95 % CI 0.86-1.21) or SPT (OR 0.68; CI 95 % 0.26-1.79). Flexible sacrum positions were associated with fewer episiotomies (OR 0.20; CI 95 % 0.10-0.54). CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of SPT and episiotomy was found among women opting for a home birth in four Nordic countries. Women used a variety of birth positions and a majority gave birth in flexible sacrum positions. No associations were found between flexible sacrum positions and SPT. Flexible sacrum positions were associated with fewer episiotomies.


Asunto(s)
Episiotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Domiciliario/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Perineo/lesiones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Partería , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 6(4): 211-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26614603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women expect childbirth to be painful. However, little is known about their expectations of the intensity of pain in childbirth (EIPC) and their attitudes to pain management. METHOD: The design was a cross-sectional survey, with self-reported questionnaires used to collect data from low-risk pregnant women (N = 1111) early in pregnancy at 26 of the largest primary health care centres in Iceland. This consecutive national sample was stratified by residency. RESULTS: The mean score for the EIPC was 5.58 (SD = 1.38) measured on a 7 point scale. The strongest predictors of a high EIPC score were: negative attitude to the impending childbirth (OR = 2.39), low manifestation of a sense of security (OR = 1.80), and a positive attitude to pain management with medication (OR = 1.63). Women living outside the capital area were less likely to have a high EIPC (OR = 0.68). Most women (77%) had a positive attitude towards pain management without medication and 35% had a positive attitude to pain management with medication. CONCLUSIONS: The study detected multiple predictors of women's EIPC and attitude to pain management. Early and throughout pregnancy, midwives and health care professionals need to address these predictors in order to assist women to prepare themselves for the pain of labour.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Parto Obstétrico , Dolor de Parto , Manejo del Dolor , Mujeres Embarazadas , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Islandia , Trabajo de Parto , Oportunidad Relativa , Parto , Embarazo , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
9.
Birth ; 42(4): 346-53, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26467758

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Normal progress of labor is a subject for discussion among professionals. The aim of this study was to assess the duration of labor in women with a planned home birth and spontaneous onset who gave birth at home or in hospital after transfer. METHODS: This is a population-based study of home births in four Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). All midwives assisting at a home birth from 2008 to 2013 were asked to provide information about home births using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Birth data from 1,612 women, from Denmark (n = 1,170), Norway (n = 263), Sweden (n = 138), and Iceland (n = 41) were included. The total median duration from onset of labor until the birth of the baby was approximately 14 hours for primiparas and 7.25 hours for multiparas. The duration of the different phases varied between countries. Blood loss more than 1,000 mL and perineal ruptures that needed suturing were associated with a longer pushing phase and the latter with country of residence, parity, single status, and the baby's weight. CONCLUSION: In this population of healthy women with a low prevalence of interventions, the total duration of labor was fairly similar to what is described in the literature for multiparas, but longer for primiparas. Although the duration of the phases of labor differed among countries, it was to a minor extent associated with severe outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Parto Domiciliario , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Parto Domiciliario/efectos adversos , Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Partería/métodos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Noruega/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Paridad , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo
11.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 5(1): 3-8, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24472383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this overview was to investigate the current situation regarding guidelines and praxis for planned homebirths and also to investigate possibilities for comparative studies on planned homebirths in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Finland and Sweden). DESIGN AND SETTING: National documents on homebirth and midwifery and recommendations regarding management and registration of planned homebirths in the included countries were investigated. FINDINGS: Guidelines regarding planned home birth were found in four of the included countries. In Denmark any woman has the right to be attended by a midwife during a homebirth and each county council must present a plan for the organization of birth services, including homebirth services. In Norway and Iceland the service is fully or partly funded by taxes and national guidelines are available but access to a midwife attending the birth varies geographically. In the Stockholm County Council guidelines have been developed for publicly funding of planned home births; for the rest of Sweden no national guidelines have been formulated and the service is privately funded. KEY CONCLUSION: Inconsistencies in the home birth services of the Nordic countries imply different opportunities for midwifery care to women with regard to their preferred place of birth. Uniform sociodemography, health care systems and cultural context in the Nordic countries are factors in favour of further research to compare and aggregate data on planned home births in this region. Additional data collection is needed since national registers do not sufficiently cover the planned place of birth.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Guías como Asunto , Parto Domiciliario , Partería , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Islandia , Embarazo , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...