Continuous evaluation of single-dose moxifloxacin concentrations in brain extracellular fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma: a novel porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding CNS pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin is limited, with unknown consequences for patients with meningitis caused by bacteria resistant to beta-lactams or caused by TB. OBJECTIVE: (i) To develop a novel porcine model for continuous investigation of moxifloxacin concentrations within brain extracellular fluid (ECF), CSF and plasma using microdialysis, and (ii) to compare these findings to the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target against TB. METHODS: Six female pigs received an intravenous single dose of moxifloxacin (6 mg/kg) similar to the current oral treatment against TB. Subsequently, moxifloxacin concentrations were determined by microdialysis within five compartments: brain ECF (cortical and subcortical) and CSF (ventricular, cisternal and lumbar) for the following 8 hours. Data were compared to simultaneously obtained plasma samples. Chemical analysis was performed by high pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. The applied PK/PD target was defined as a maximum drug concentration (Cmax):MIC ratio >8. RESULTS: We present a novel porcine model for continuous in vivo CNS pharmacokinetics for moxifloxacin. Cmax and AUC0-8h within brain ECF were significantly lower compared to plasma and lumbar CSF, but insignificantly different compared to ventricular and cisternal CSF. Unbound Cmax:MIC ratio across all investigated compartments ranged from 1.9 to 4.3. CONCLUSION: A single dose of weight-adjusted moxifloxacin administered intravenously did not achieve adequate target site concentrations within the uninflamed porcine brain ECF and CSF to reach the applied TB CNS target.

Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship in Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands - current landscape and barriers.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current organization and implementation of formalized, multi-disciplinary hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) structures in Denmark, the Faroe Islands and Greenland. METHODS: A structured electronic questionnaire was sent to all trainees and specialists in clinical microbiology (N=207) and infectious diseases (N=260), as well as clinical pharmacists (N=20) and paediatricians (N=10) with expertise in infectious diseases. The survey had 30 multiple-choice, rating-scale, and open-ended questions based on an international consensus checklist for hospital AMS, adapted to a Danish context. RESULTS: Overall, 145 individual responses representing 20 hospitals were received. Nine hospitals (45%) reported a formal AMS strategy, eight (40%) a formal organizational multi-disciplinary structure and a multi-disciplinary AMS team, and six (30%) a designated professional as a leader of the AMS team. A majority of hospitals reported access to updated guidelines (80%) and regularly monitored and reported the quantity of antibiotics prescribed (70% and 65%, respectively). Only one hospital (5%) reported a dedicated, sustainable and sufficient AMS budget, three hospitals (15%) audited courses of therapy for specific agents/clinical conditions and four hospitals (20%) had a document clearly defining roles, procedures of collaboration and responsibilities for AMS. A total of 42% of all individual respondents had received formal AMS training. Main barriers were a lack of financial resources (52%), a lack of mandate from the hospital management (30%) and AMS not being a priority (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Core elements important for multi-disciplinary hospital-based AMS can be strengthened in Danish hospitals. Funding, clear mandates, prioritization from the hospital management and the implementation of multi-disciplinary AMS structures may help close the identified gaps.

Long-term complications after infection with SARS-CoV-1, influenza and MERS-CoV - Lessons to learn in long COVID?

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions of people worldwide, and while the mortality rate remains the primary concern, it is becoming increasingly apparent that many COVID-19 survivors experience long-term sequelae, representing a major concern for both themselves and healthcare providers. Comparing long-term sequelae following COVID-19 to those of other respiratory viruses such as influenza, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-1 is an essential step toward understanding the extent and impact of these sequelae. A literature search was carried out using the PubMed. database. Search-terms included "persistent", "long-term", "chronic", and MeSH-terms for SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and Influenza. Only English-language articles were selected. Articles were screened by title/abstract and full-text readings. Key points for comparison were persistent symptoms > 4 weeks, virus type, study design, population size, admission status, methods, and findings. Thirty-one articles were included: 19 on SARS-CoV-1, 10 on influenza, and 2 on MERS-CoV-survivors. Damage to the respiratory system was the main long-term manifestation after the acute phase of infection. Quality of life-related and psychological sequelae were the second and third most widely reported symptoms, respectively. Consistent with long-term sequelae from COVID-19, persisting cardiovascular, neurological, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal impairments were also reported. In summary, the long-term sequelae following COVID-19 are a significant concern, and while long-term sequelae following influenza, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-1 have also been reported, their prevalence and severity are less clear. It is essential to continue to study and monitor the long-term effects of all respiratory viruses so as to improve our understanding and develop strategies for prevention and treatment.