Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 18(4): 513-519, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728641

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination against coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is highly effective in preventing severe disease and mortality. Adenoviral vector and mRNA vaccines were effective against intensive care unit (ICU) admission, but the effectiveness of inactivated vaccine on ICU admission was unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vaccination status on ICU admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a country with heterologous vaccination policy. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted in three hospitals in Izmir, Turkey between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2022. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and hospitalized due to COVID-19 were included in the study. Patients who had never been vaccinated and patients who had been vaccinated with a single dose were considered unvaccinated. A logistic regression analysis was performed for evaluating risk factors for ICU admission. RESULTS: A total of 2,110 patients were included in the final analysis. The median age was 66 years (IQR, 53-76 years) and 54% of the patients were vaccinated. During the study period, 407 patients (19.3%) were transferred to the ICU due to disease severity. Patients who were admitted to the ICU were older (median age 68 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001); and the number of unvaccinated individuals was higher among ICU patients (57% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, being unvaccinated was found to be the most important independent risk factor for ICU admission with an OR of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.64-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination against COVID-19 is effective against ICU admission and hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Turquía , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Int J STD AIDS ; 35(6): 430-437, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38261725

RESUMEN

Background: HIV-ASSIST is a free, continuously updated, clinically validated online algorithm tool that synthesizes participant- and virus-specific characteristics and provides ART decision support based on the goals of maximizing viral suppression and tolerability. The aim of this study was to analyze the concordance of clinicians' ART preferences with HIV-ASSIST recommendations and the influencing factors. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of people with HIV (PWH) followed in the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Department of Health Sciences University Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital. The concordance between prescribed ART and HIV-ASSIST recommendations was evaluated. Results: The study included 101 participants (92 male, 91.1%), median age was 35 (20-67), and 24.8% of participants were treatment-experienced. The concordance between prescribed ART and HIV-ASSIST recommendations was 90.1% (absolute concordance 60.4%). The concordance rate was 89.5% (absolute concordance rate was 64.5%) in treatment-naive participants; 92% (absolute concordance rate was 48%) in treatment-experienced participants. Factors that were associated with discordance in the multivariate analysis were co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and hyperlipidemia. Conclusion: The recommendations of the HIV-ASSIST algorithm were found to be highly concordant with the ART prescriptions of our clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Algoritmos , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Adulto Joven , Toma de Decisiones
3.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 67(12): 1825-1831, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34909957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the antibody response and the side effects of the two-dose inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac, China) among a health care worker population in Turkey. METHODS: This study was a prospective, cross-sectional, single-center study conducted between December 16, 2020, and March 15, 2021. We evaluated the side effects from a questionnaire, and anti-spike immunoglobulin G response to the vaccine (0- and 28-day schedule) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: A total of 94 of 184 health care workers completed this study. The percentages of participants who were seronegative at baseline and achieved to the seropositivity were 21.3 and 97.9%, respectively, on day 21 after vaccinations. The seropositivity was predominantly detected in 31-45 years of the age group (55.4%, p=0.636), normal body mass index (47.8%, p=0.999), nonsmokers (64.1%, p=0.999), those without any comorbidities (73.9%, p=0.463), and those without any side effects (70.2%, p=0.256). The frequencies of overall side effects within seven days after the first and second doses of CoronaVac were 37.2 and 28.7%, respectively. The most common side effects was localized pain at the injection site (15.7 and 11.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found that vaccination by two-dose CoronaVac could elicit a specific humoral response, and it was well tolerated in health care workers. The high seropositivity developed after the second dose attracted attention. Our study will be useful in terms of showing short-term immunity and side effects.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Formación de Anticuerpos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 55(4): 673-682, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34666667

RESUMEN

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection causes excessive cytokine response and a decrease in cellular immune response and this increases susceptibility to fungal co-infections. Mucormycosis is a rare, lifethreatening invasive fungal infection. In this report, two cases who developed rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis shortly after having COVID-19 infection were presented. The first case was a 68-year old woman who admitted to our clinic with orbital cellulitis in her left eye and had a known diagnosis of asthma and rheumatoid arthritis. She was diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia 40 days ago, stayed in the intensive care unit for a long time, and received pulse steroid (1000 mg methylprednisolone), interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor (anakinra) and broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments together with antiviral therapy during this period. The second case was a 63-year-old male patient with known diabetes mellitus, hypertension and retinitis pigmentosa, with a history of hospitalization in the intensive care unit due to COVID-19 pneumonia 20 days ago and received pulse steroid therapy during this period. He admitted to our clinic with the complaints of droopy right eyelid, swelling, nausea and vomiting. In both cases, paranasal sinus tomography findings were consistent with invasive sinusitis. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery was performed immediately in less than 16 hours from the first admission in both cases. Histopathological examination of the both cases revealed results consistent with mucormycosis. Mucorales spp. was isolated in sinus tissue culture of the second case taken during the operation. Both of the patients received liposomal amphotericin B. First case died on the 19th day of the treatment. Second case was discharged with full recovery after nine weeks of treatment. The suppression of cellular immunity during the COVID-19 infection, and the use of steroids and interleukin inhibitors in the treatment of severe cases may increase secondary invasive fungal infections. Therefore, clinicians should more frequently consider possible fungal infections in patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo , Enfermedades Orbitales , Anciano , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Orbitales/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 55(3): 357-373, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416802

RESUMEN

Globally 364102 healthcare professionals have been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and 1253 of them died until 15 January 2021. Healthcare professionals serving at the forefront of combating the pandemic are in the high risk group. In our country, the data about coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare professionals are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence in healthcare professionals, to evaluate the risks they encountered during work, and to examine their relationships with antibody positivity. A total of 572 healthcare professionals serving in various units of our hospital participated in our study and the presence of anti-nucleocapsid IgG was investigated by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (SARS-CoV-2 IgG test, Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics, USA) method in serum samples collected between May 18, 2020 and June 30, 2020. The demographic characteristics, medical history, work conditions, medical procedures performed and possible risk factors were questioned with a questionnaire form. The average age of the participants was 33.5 ± 9.2 (19-61) years, and 62.9% (360/572) of them were women. In our study, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was 3.7% (21/572). The association of the antibody positivity with age, gender and occupational status was not statistically significant (p> 0.05). Comorbid diseases which were significantly higher in seropositive healthcare professionals were hypertension (19%) and diabetes mellitus (14.3%) (p<0.05). It was observed that antibody positivity was significantly higher in healthcare professionals working in high (52.4%) and medium risk (33.3%) areas, those who treat and/or examine patients with suspicious or positive COVID-19 (66.7%) and those who spend more than 30 minutes in COVID-19 patient rooms (76%) (p<0.05). The symptoms associated with seropositivity in healthcare workers with a history of symptoms (46%) were loss of smell (23.5%), loss of taste (20.0%) and respiratory distress (16.7%) (p<0.05). It was observed that the probability of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 increased 12 times if there was a colleague with COVID-19 in the hospital, four times if there was a patient in the house/lodging and six times if there was an infected person in the social environment (p<0.05). The rate of those who had the flu vaccine among the participants was 10.8% (62/572) and 9.7% of them were found to be anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive (p<0.05, 95% CI= 1.31-9.48). The seropositivity was significantly higher in non-smokers (4.8 %) compared to smokers (0.0%) (p<0.05). In our study, it was determined that the rate of seropositivity was 12 times higher in healthcare professionals who stated that they received hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis due to risky contact compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (p<0.05, 95% CI= 4.11-40.64). The ratio of the personnel who answered "always" to the frequency of wearing gloves, masks, goggles/face shields and overalls was 85.7%, 96.9%, 62.1% and 65.4%, respectively. In conclusion, regular and large-scale seroepidemiological screening of healthcare professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic can contribute to the control of the pandemic by providing a better understanding of transmission dynamics and risk factors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto Joven
6.
Infez Med ; 25(4): 339-343, 2017 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29286012

RESUMEN

Viral hepatitis is the most common cause of serious health problems such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Leading to immunodeficiency disorders through different mechanisms, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) causes the development of severe secondary infections. Hepatitis A (HAV) is thought to spread by the faecal-oral route, while Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV) and HIV are mostly transmitted vertically during childhood. In our study, we aimed to determine the seroprevalence of HAV, HBV, HCV and HIV among Syrian refugee children who were admitted to outpatient clinics. We conducted a retrospective review of data concerning 171 Syrian children aged between 0-18 years admitted between April 2014 and December 2015 to the outpatient infectious disease clinic of ?zmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital and the social welfare outpatient clinic for Syrian refugees for reasons other than jaundice. Serum samples from patients were studied for HAV antibody IgG (anti-HAV IgG), HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies against HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs), antibodies against HBV core antigen (anti-HBc total), HCV antibody (anti-HCV) (anti-HIV) with the ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) method. In this study 51% of patients were female, with a mean age of 6.52 years among all patients. Six of the 140 patients (4.2%) scanned for HBV among the patients enrolled in the study were HBsAg and anti-HBc total positive and anti-HBs negative. Three patients (2.1%) were HBsAg negative, and anti-HBc total and anti-HBs positive, which indicated they had previously recovered from an HBV infection. HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc total data for 140 patients (81.9%), anti-HCV data for 109 patients (63.8%), anti-HIV data for 88 patients (51.5%) and HAV IgG data for 86 patients (50.3%) were obtained. Due to migration from regions in Syria where there is no regular follow-up of HBV vaccination in children, HBsAg seroprevalence of refugee children is thought to be higher than in other children in Turkey and anti-HBs positivity is thought to be lower. We expected to see a higher seroprevalence of anti-HCV and anti-HIV in Syria due to the lack of health facilities such as non-regular anti-HCV and anti-HIV screening before blood transfusions and during pregnancy in all regions of Syria. Yet in this study, the anti-HCV, anti-HIV seroprevalence of Syrian refugee children was similar to that in Turkey. According to the results, if the children of asylum seekers are admitted to the national HAV and HBV vaccination schedule, hepatitis infections and their complications may be prevented.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Seroprevalencia de VIH , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Siria/etnología , Turquía/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...