Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Liver Int ; 32(9): 1415-25, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22716112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The presence of the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-eAg in patients with hepatitis B is associated with higher HBV replication and with an increased risk to develop liver-related clinical endpoints defined as liver related death, liver transplantation, development of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic decompensation. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of HBeAg in patients co-infected with the hepatitis D virus (HDV). METHODS: We studied virological markers of HBV and HDV infection and as well as biochemical and clinical features of liver disease in a cohort of 534 anti-HDV-positive patients. In addition, we compared the clinical long-term outcome of HBeAg-positive HDV-infected patients with HBeAg-negative control patients matched for age, gender and baseline-MELD score. RESULTS: HBeAg-positive hepatitis delta was detected in 71 of 534 patients (13.3%). HBeAg positivity was associated with a higher biochemical disease activity and higher HBsAg levels in HDV co-infected patients. Sixty one per cent of the HBeAg-positive HDV-infected patients presented with HBV DNA levels below 2000 IU/ml, at least once during follow-up. Both HBeAg-positive and -negative patients showed a similar severe clinical long-term course with about half of the patients developing a liver-related clinical complication after a median follow-up period of 51 months (range: 9-193 months). CONCLUSIONS: HBV DNA levels are low in both HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients suggesting suppressive effects of HDV on HBV irrespective of the phase of HBV infection. The clinical long-term outcome of HBeAg-positive patients is not different to HBeAg-negative patients infected with the HDV.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Hepatitis D Crónica/patología , Virus de la Hepatitis Delta/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Viral/análisis , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , Virus de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis D Crónica/inmunología , Hepatitis D Crónica/mortalidad , Virus de la Hepatitis Delta/genética , Virus de la Hepatitis Delta/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Adulto Joven
2.
Med Oncol ; 28(4): 1255-9, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20473647

RESUMEN

It is well established that adjuvant treatment reduces mortality after early breast cancer. However, the optimal timing of adjuvant treatment is not well described. To determine the optimal timing of adjuvant treatment, 402 breast cancer patients who received adjuvant treatment at Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital between January 1995 and August 2002 were evaluated retrospectively. Three hundred and fifty-seven (88.8%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 204 (50.7%) of these patients received only adjuvant chemotherapy and 153 (38%) patients received tamoxifen following chemotherapy. Remaining 45 (11.2%) patients received only adjuvant tamoxifen. The median time to start adjuvant treatment after surgery was day 21 (range, days 4 to days 258), and the median follow-up was 50 months (range, 6-105 months). The patients were divided into 5 groups according to starting time of chemotherapy (shorter than 14 days, between days 15-29, between days 30-44, between days 45.-59 and more than 59 days). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not shown significantly different between for 5 groups (P>0.05). Secondly, patients were divided into two groups as starting adjuvant treatment equal to or shorter than 44 days and longer than 44 days (n=344, 85.6% and vs. n=58, 14.4%, respectively). OS was significantly better in patients who started to receive adjuvant treatment within 44 days after surgery compared to patients who received adjuvant treatment after 44 days (92 vs. 83.3%, P=0.03) for 5 years, but DFS was not significantly different between two groups (83.4 vs. 82.2%, P>0.05). According to our study, adjuvant treatment of breast cancer should be initiated earlier after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Moduladores Selectivos de los Receptores de Estrógeno/administración & dosificación , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...