Chronic appendicitis: the process from pre-diagnosis to pathology.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic appendicitis (CA) is a rare medical condition. CA is characterized by a less severe and almost continuous abdominal pain. It has a clinical picture lasting longer than 1-2 days and extending over weeks, months, even years. The exact etiology of CA is unclear. Certain resources have reported it as the cause of partial obstruction in the lumen of the appendix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study was carried out with the approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. A retrospective analysis was performed between August 2018 and March 2020. RESULTS: It was determined that 207 appendectomies were performed during the retrospective scan period. The data of 182 of these patients could be accessed fully and we could get answers to the criteria we thought. Only 8 of the patients screened were likely to be diagnosed with chronic appendicitis in the preoperative period. CA was found in 1 of the 8 patients (12.5%) who underwent surgery after a preliminary diagnosis of CA. Two patients were reported as malignant (25%), 3 patients (37.5%) as reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, and 1 patient as peri appendicitis (12.5%). Bleeding and congestion were reported in the last patient (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of chronic appendicitis is made by pathological examination. It may not always be possible to consider "chronic appendicitis" as a preliminary diagnosis. This should still be kept in mind. In our opinion, it is a bit difficult to make a preliminary diagnosis of chronic appendicitis and make a surgical decision. We believe that controlled and prospective studies can shed more light on chronic appendicitis.

Surgical correction of female urinary incontinence: comparison of colporrhaphy, sling and suspension procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse clinical outcomes of three types of pelvic surgery for the correction of female mixed or stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Women who underwent surgery for urinary incontinence between January 2000 and June 2010 were included in the study (n = 268). Patients were nonrandomly assigned to undergo colporrhaphy, suspension procedure or sling procedure according to their clinical situation. Perioperative parameters were recorded. Short- (< 5 years) and long-term (5-10 years) success rates were determined for each group. RESULTS: The short- and long-term complete cure rates were significantly lower, and the duration of catheterization significantly longer, in patients who underwent colporrhaphy compared with both other groups, but there were no significant differences between suspension or sling procedures. CONCLUSION: Sling and suspension procedures were equally effective in this study, and both were preferable to colporrhaphy.