Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation. METHODS: A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CINAHL, Scopus, and African Index Medicus databases for studies describing labor curves, assessing their effectiveness in improving birth outcomes, or assessing their accuracy as screening or diagnostic tools. Original research articles and systematic reviews were included. We excluded studies investigating adverse birth outcomes retrospectively, and those investigating the effect of analgesia-related interventions on labor progression. Study eligibility was assessed, and data were extracted from included studies using a piloted charting form. The findings are presented according to descriptive summaries created for the included studies. RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle-income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.

ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION: ST waveform analysis (STAN) was introduced as an adjunct to cardiotocography (CTG) to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. The aim of the present study was to quantify the efficacy of STAN vs CTG and assess the quality of the evidence using GRADE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed systematic literature searches to identify randomized controlled trials and assessed included studies for risk of bias. We performed meta-analyses, calculating pooled risk ratio (RR) or Peto odds ratio (OR). We also performed post hoc trial sequential analyses for selected outcomes to assess the risk of false-positive results and the need for additional studies. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials including 28 729 women were included in the meta-analysis. There were no differences between the groups in operative deliveries for fetal distress (10.9 vs 11.1%; RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.11). STAN was associated with a significantly lower rate of metabolic acidosis (0.45% vs 0.68%; Peto OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.90). Accordingly, 441 women need to be monitored with STAN instead of CTG alone to prevent one case of metabolic acidosis. Women allocated to STAN had a reduced risk of fetal blood sampling compared with women allocated to conventional CTG monitoring (12.5% vs 19.6%; RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.49-0.80). The quality of the evidence was high to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute effects of STAN were minor and the clinical significance of the observed reduction in metabolic acidosis is questioned. There is insufficient evidence to state that STAN as an adjunct to CTG leads to important clinical benefits compared with CTG alone.

Association of oxytocin augmentation and duration of labour with postpartum haemorrhage: A cohort study of nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: Both duration of labour and use of oxytocin for augmentation are known risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage but distinguishing between the significance of these factors is complex. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between both labour duration and oxytocin augmentation, for postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: A cohort study based on a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Term nulliparous women with a single foetus in cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of active labour and a vaginal birth. The participants were originally included in cluster-randomised trial conducted in Norway from December 1, 2014, to January 31, 2017, that aimed to compare the frequency of intrapartum caesarean sections when adhering to the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline. MEASUREMENTS: The data were analysed through four statistical models. Model 1 investigated the effect of oxytocin augmentation as a dichotomous variable (yes/no); Model 2 investigated the effect of the duration of oxytocin augmentation; Model 3 investigated the effect of the maximum dose of oxytocin; and Model 4 investigated the effect of both the duration of augmentation and the maximum dose of oxytocin. All four models included duration of labour divided into five time-intervals. We used binary logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios of postpartum haemorrhage, defined as blood loss of ≥ 1000 ml, including a random intercept for hospital and mutually adjusting for oxytocin augmentation and labour duration in addition to maternal age, maternal marital status, maternal higher education level, maternal smoking habits in the first trimester, maternal body mass index and birth weight. FINDINGS: Model 1 found a significant association between the use of oxytocin and postpartum haemorrhage. In Model 2, oxytocin augmentation of ≥ 4.5 h was associated with postpartum haemorrhage. In Model 3, we found an association between a maximum dose of oxytocin of ≥ 20 mU/min and postpartum haemorrhage. Model 4 showed that a maximum dose of oxytocin ≥ 20 mU/min was associated with postpartum haemorrhage both for those augmented < 4.5 h and for those augmented ≥ 4.5 h. Duration of labour was associated with postpartum haemorrhage in all models if lasting ≥ 16 h. KEY CONCLUSIONS: We found both oxytocin augmentation and labour duration to be associated with postpartum haemorrhage. Oxytocin doses of ≥ 20 mU/min and a labour duration of ≥ 16 h showed an independent association. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The potent drug oxytocin should be carefully administered, as doses of ≥ 20 mU/min were associated with an increased risk of PPH, regardless of the duration of oxytocin augmentation.

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury associated with female genital mutilation/cutting and timing of deinfibulation.

INTRODUCTION: A greater risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury has been reported among African migrants in several host countries compared with the general population. To what degree female genital mutilation/cutting affects this risk is not clear. In infibulated women, deinfibulation prevents anal sphincter injury. Whether the timing of deinfibulation affects the risk, is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risks of anal sphincter injury associated with female genital mutilation/cutting and timing of deinfibulation in Norway, and to compare the rates of anal sphincter injury in Somali-born women and the general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a historical cohort study, nulliparous Somali-born women who had a vaginal birth in the period 1990-2014 were identified by the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and data collected from medical records. Exposures were female genital mutilation/cutting status and deinfibulation before labor, during labor or no deinfibulation. The main outcome was obstetric anal sphincter injuries. RESULTS: Rates of obstetric anal sphincter injury did not differ significantly by female genital mutilation/cutting status (type 1-2: 10.2%, type 3: 11.3%, none: 15.2% P = 0.17). The total rate of anal sphincter injury was 10.3% compared to 5.0% among nulliparous women in the general Norwegian population. Women who underwent deinfibulation during labor had a lower risk than women who underwent deinfibulation before labor (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.86, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of anal sphincter injury in Somali nulliparous women was not related to type of female genital mutilation/cutting. Deinfibulation during labor protected against anal sphincter injury, whereas deinfibulation before labor was associated with a doubled risk. Deinfibulation before labor should not be routinely recommended during pregnancy.

Room for improvement in maternity care. / Fødselsomsorgen kan bli bedre.

Adverse events still occur in maternity care, and many could be avoided. We must be better at learning from our own mistakes.

Association between one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour and use of pain relief and birth outcomes: A cohort of nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between one-to-one midwifery care and birth outcomes with pain relief as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include obstetric and neonatal outcomes, such as mode of birth and Apgar score. DESIGN: A cohort study of women originally included in a cluster randomised trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The analysis is based on data from The Labour Progression Study (LaPS), a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) including 7,277 women, conducted in fourteen obstetric units in Norway, between 2014 and 2017. The participants were nulliparous with a singleton full-term foetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour. In this cohort, 7,103 women with information about on one-to-one midwifery care were included. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Logistic regression analysis show that nulliparous women receiving one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour are less likely to have an epidural analgesia, adjusted OR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.72,0.91), less likely to be given nitrous oxide, adjusted OR of 0.77 (95% CI 0.69,0.85), and they more often received massages, adjusted OR of 1.76 (95% CI 1.47,2.11), compared with women not receiving one-to-one midwifery care. Descriptive analyses show that women receiving one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour are less likely to have a caesarean section (5.8% vs. 7.2%) and they are less likely to have an operative vaginal birth (16.5% vs. 23.7%). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of low Apgar scores at five minutes. KEY CONCLUSIONS: We found that one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour may be associated with birth outcomes, including decreased use of epidural analgesia and a decreased rate of caesarean sections and operative vaginal birth. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study could encourage midwives to be present during the active phase of labour to promote physiological birth.

Associations between cervical dilatation on admission and mode of delivery, a cohort study of Norwegian nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between cervical dilatation at hospital admission and mode of delivery. METHODS: A cohort study with data from a cluster-randomised controlled trial, the Labour Progression Study. The study population of 6511 nulliparous women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation with spontaneous onset of labour at term, was divided into two groups: <4 cm and ≥ 4 cm cervical dilatation on admission. Binary logistic regression comparing mode of delivery was used to estimate crude and adjusted OR with associated 95% CI. RESULTS: Of the total study population, 56.7% were admitted with < 4 cm cervical dilatation and 43.3% with ≥ 4 cm. Women admitted with ≥ 4 cm had a significantly higher chance of spontaneous delivery, with adjusted OR of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.14-1.44), and a significantly lower risk of caesarean sections, with an adjusted OR of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41-0.64). For operative vaginal delivery, there were no significant difference between the study groups. Intrapartum interventions as epidural analgesia and augmentation with oxytocin were lower among women admitted with ≥ 4 cm cervical dilatation. CONCLUSION: The study found a significantly higher chance of spontaneous delivery among women admitted with ≥ 4 cm. More research is needed to investigate why so many women are admitted early in labour, and how these women can be better cared for to increase their chances of a spontaneous delivery.

The effect of Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on childbirth experience measured by the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire in the Labor Progression Study (LaPS): A cluster randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Childbirth experience is an increasingly recognized and important measure of quality of obstetric care. Previous research has shown that it can be affected by intrapartum care and how labor is followed. A partograph is recommended to follow labor progression by recording cervical dilation over time. There are currently different guidelines in use worldwide to follow labor progression. The two main ones are the partograph recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on the work of Friedman and Philpott and a guideline based on Zhang's research. In our study we assessed the effect of adhering to Zhang's guideline or the WHO partograph on childbirth experience. Zhang's guideline describes expected normal labor progression based on data from contemporary obstetric populations, resulting in an exponential progression curve, compared with the linear WHO partograph. The choice of labor curve affects the intrapartum follow-up of women and this could potentially affect childbirth experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Labor Progression Study (LaPS) study was a prospective, cluster randomized controlled trial conducted at 14 birth centers in Norway. Birth centers were randomized to either follow Zhang's guideline or the WHO partograph. Nulliparous women in active labor, with one fetus in cephalic presentation at term and spontaneous labor onset were included. At 4 weeks postpartum, included women received an online login to complete the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Total score on the CEQ, the four domain scores on the CEQ, and scores on the individual items on the CEQ were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 1855 women in the Zhang group and 1749 women in the WHO partograph group. There was no difference in the total or domain CEQ scores between the two groups. We found statistically significant differences for two individual items; women in the Zhang group scored lower on positive memories and feeling of control. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings on childbirth experience there is no reason to prefer Zhang's guideline over the WHO partograph.

Female genital cutting in women living in Norway - consequences and treatment. / Omskjæring hos kvinner bosatt i Norge ­ konsekvenser og behandling.

BACKGROUND: Seven Norwegian hospitals offer an outpatient service for women who have undergone female genital cutting (FGC). This study presents symptoms, findings and treatment in women who were examined at the outpatient clinics in the period 2004-2015. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Each hospital identified patients by searching for relevant diagnostic and procedure codes. All those who had been examined at the outpatient clinics were included. Data were retrieved from patient records. RESULTS: A total of 913 women were included. The median age at the time of undergoing FGC was seven years, and at the time of consultation, 26 years. Almost half of the women were pregnant. The majority (81 %) had FGC type III (infibulation). Of these, 87 % had gynaecological problems. Of women with types I and II FGC, 55 % and 70 %, respectively, reported gynaecological problems. Altogether 64 % received surgical treatment, primarily deinfibulation (98 %). Few complications were recorded. INTERPRETATION: In many young, non-pregnant infibulated women, FGC-related problems that can be treated with deinfibulation may have been present since childhood and adolescence. There is probably an unmet need for treatment, irrespective of the type of FGM.

Associations between duration of active second stage of labour and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort study of nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between the duration of the active second stage of labour and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHOD: This cohort study is based on data from a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) undertaken at 14 Norwegian birth clinics in Norway from 2014 to 2017. The final sample involved 6804 nulliparous women with a singleton fetus, cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset of labour at term, vaginal delivered and with an active second stage of labour. The women were grouped to active second stage of labour ≤ 60 min and active second stage of labour > 60 min. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with an associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing women in the two groups. RESULTS: There was an increased risk of postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 ml with an adjusted OR 1.31 (95% CI: 1.01-1.69) when the active second stage of labour exceeded 60 min. There was no significant difference in the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (adjusted OR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.65-1.39]), Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min age (adjusted OR 1.13 [95% CI: 0.65-1.97]) or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR 1.46 [95% CI: 0.61-3.51]) between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Women with an active second stage of labour that exceeds 60 min had an increased risk of postpartum haemorrhage > 1000 ml. We found no association between duration of active stage of labour and obstetric anal sphincter injuries or adverse neonatal outcomes.

Adverse events reporting by obstetric units in Norway as part of their quality assurance and patient safety work: an analysis of practice.

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision aims to contribute to the improvement of quality and patient safety in the healthcare services. Planned audits were performed to investigate how 12 selected Norwegian obstetric units reported and analyzed adverse events as the part of their quality assurance and patient safety work. METHODS: Serious adverse events coded as birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage that occurred during 2014 (the most recent year for which the quality assured data were available) were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. The obstetric units were asked to submit medical records, internal adverse events reports, and their internal guidelines outlining which events should be reported to the quality assurance system. We identified the adverse events at each obstetric unit that were reported internally and/or to the central authorities. Two obstetricians carried out an evaluation of each event reported. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three serious adverse events were registered among 17,323 births that took place at the selected units. Twenty-one events were excluded because of incorrect coding or missing information. Eight events were registered in more than one category, and these were distributed to the category directly related to injury or adverse outcome. Nine of twelve (75 %) obstetric units had written guidelines describing which events should be reported. The obstetric units reported 49 of 524 (9.3 %) serious adverse events in their internal quality assurance system and 39 (7.4 %) to central authorities. Of the very serious adverse events, 29 of 149 (19.4 %) were reported. Twenty-three of 49 (47 %) reports did not contain relevant assessments or proposals for improving quality and patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that adverse event reporting and analyses by Norwegian obstetric units, as a part of quality assurance and patient safety work, are suboptimal. The reporting culture and compliance with guidelines need to be improved substantially for better safety in patient care, risk mitigation and clinical quality assurance.

Female genital mutilation/cutting, timing of deinfibulation, and risk of cesarean section.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on obstetric outcomes in high-income countries is not clear. In general, women with female genital mutilation/cutting type 3 (infibulation) seem to be most at risk of adverse outcomes such as cesarean section. Deinfibulation is recommended to prevent obstetric complications. Whether the timing of this procedure affects the complication risk is not known. The aims of this study were, first, to examine the association between female genital mutilation/cutting and the risk of cesarean section in Norway, and, second, whether the timing of deinfibulation affected the cesarean section risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a historical cohort study of nulliparous Somali-born women who gave birth in Norway between 1990 and 2014. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway identified the women. Data were collected from medical records at 11 participating birth units. The exposures were female genital mutilation/cutting status and deinfibulation before pregnancy, during pregnancy, or no deinfibulation before labor onset. The main outcome was odds ratio (OR) of cesarean section. Type of cesarean section, primary indications, and neonatal outcomes were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Women with female genital mutilation/cutting type 3 had lower risk of cesarean section compared with women with no female genital mutilation/cutting (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89 P = .02). Among the 1504 included women, the cesarean section rate was 28.0% and the proportion of emergency operations was 92.9%. Fetal distress was the primary indication in approximately 50% of cases, across the groups with different female genital mutilation/cutting status. Women who had no deinfibulation before labor onset had lower risk of cesarean section compared with those who underwent deinfibulation before or during pregnancy (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88 P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: High risk of cesarean section in Somali nulliparous women was not related to the type of female genital mutilation/cutting in the present study. Deinfibulation before labor did not protect against cesarean section. Our findings indicate that nulliparous Somali women are at high risk of intrapartum complications. Future research should focus on measures to reduce maternal morbidity and on how timing of deinfibulation affects the outcomes of vaginal births.

Establishment of treatment methods without critical reflection. / Etablering av behandlingsmetoder uten kritisk refleksjon.

New treatment methods are sometimes introduced with no knowledge of whether the method yields better results than established treatment or how frequently complications arise.

How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.

INTRODUCTION: The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision inspects healthcare institutions to ensure safety and quality of health and welfare services. A planned inspection of 12 maternity units aimed to investigate the practice of obstetric care in the case of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and severe postpartum hemorrhage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The inspection was carried out at two large, four medium and six small maternity units in Norway in 2016 to investigate adverse events that occurred between 1 January and 31 December 2014. Six of them were selected as control units. The Norwegian Board of Health Supervision searched the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to identify adverse events in each of the categories and then requested access to the medical records for all patients identified. Information about guidelines, formal teaching and simulation training at each unit was obtained by sending a questionnaire to the obstetrician in charge of each maternity unit. RESULTS: The obstetric units inspected had 553 serious adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia or severe postpartum hemorrhage among 17 323 deliveries. Twenty-nine events were excluded from further analysis due to erroneous coding or missing data in the patients' medical records. We included 524 cases (3.0% of all deliveries) of adverse events in the final analysis. Medical errors caused by substandard care were present in 295 (56.2%) cases. There was no difference in the prevalence of substandard care among the maternity units according to their size. Surprisingly, we found significantly fewer cases with substandard care in the units which the supervisory authorities considered particularly risky before the inspection, compared with the control units. Seven of the 12 units had regular formal teaching and training arrangements for obstetric healthcare personnel as outlined in the national guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of adverse events was 3% and similar in all maternity units irrespective of their size. A breach in the standard of care was observed in 56.2% of cases and almost half of the maternity units did not follow national recommendations regarding teaching and practical training of obstetric personnel, suggesting that they should focus on implementing guidelines and training their staff.

Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort study of nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigates associations between maternal body mass index (BMI) early in pregnancy and obstetric interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cohort study of nulliparous women originally included in a cluster randomized controlled trial carried out at 14 Norwegian obstetric units between 2014 and 2017. The sample included 7189 nulliparous women with a singleton fetus, cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor at term, denoted as group 1 in the Ten-Group Classification System. The women were grouped according to the World Health Organization BMI classifications: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), pre-obesity (BMI 25.0-29.9), obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9), and obesity classes II and III (BMI ≥35.0). We used binary logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of the interventions and outcomes, with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing women in different BMI groups with women of normal weight. RESULTS: We found an increased risk of intrapartum cesarean section in women of obesity class I and obesity classes II and III, with adjusted OR of 1.70 (95% CI 1.21-2.38) and 2.31 (95% CI 1.41-3.77), respectively. Women in obesity groups had a gradient of risk of epidural analgesia and use of continuous CTG (including STAN), with adjusted OR of 2.39 (95% CI 1.69-3.38) and 3.28 (95% CI 1.97-5.48), respectively. Women in obesity classes II and III had higher risk of amniotomy (adjusted OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-1.96), oxytocin augmentation (adjusted OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.11-2.15), obstetric anal sphincter injuries (adjusted OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.85) and postpartum hemorrhage ≥1000 mL (adjusted OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.29-3.78). We found a reduced likelihood of spontaneous vaginal delivery for pre-obese women (adjusted OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97) and no associations between maternal BMI and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Obese women in Ten-Group Classification System group 1 had increased risks of obstetric interventions and maternal complications. There was a gradient of risk for intrapartum cesarean section, with the highest risk for women in obesity classes II and III. No associations between maternal BMI and neonatal outcomes were observed.

Baseline pain characteristics predict pain reduction after physical therapy in women with chronic pelvic pain. Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.

Background and aims Women with chronic pelvic pain represent a heterogeneous group, and it is suggested that the existence of sub-groups can explain varying results and inconclusiveness in clinical trials. Some predictors of treatment outcome are suggested, but the evidence is limited. The primary aim of this study was to explore if selected pre-treatment characteristics of the participants in a recently conducted randomized controlled trial were associated with treatment outcome. Methods In this study secondary analysis of data collected in a randomized trial were conducted. The participants were women with chronic pelvic pain randomized to two different physical therapy treatments. Analyses in this study were performed for the whole group as a cohort. The primary outcome measure was change in pain intensity from baseline to 12 months, measured with the numeric rating scale (0-10). The women were asked to rate their mean pelvic pain intensity during the last 7 days. Based on previous research and on available variables from the randomized controlled trial four potential predictive factors were derived from the baseline data and assessed one by one in a linear regression model, adjusted for age and treatment group. The variables with strongest association (p < 0.10) with the primary outcome were further included in a multivariable linear regression model with backward selection, adjusted for age and treatment group. Results Fifty women (mean age 38.1, SD = 12.2) were included in the analysis. For these women the mean change in pain intensity was -1.2 points (95% CI -1.8 to -0.7) from baseline to 12 months. The multivariable regression model showed that pelvic pain duration of 6 years or more was associated with less decrease in pain intensity with a regression coefficient of 1.3 (95% CI 0.3-2.4). Baseline pain intensity was associated with higher pain reduction after PT treatment with a regression coefficient per SD increase in baseline pain of -0.6 (95% CI -1.1 to -0.1). None of the women with main pain site other places than in the pelvis reported any pain reduction after physical therapy treatment, but due to the small numbers the predictor was not included in the regression analysis. Conclusions We identified that pelvic pain duration of 6 years or more was associated with less pain reduction, and that higher baseline pain intensity was associated with higher pain reduction after physical therapy treatment in this sample of women with chronic pelvic pain. For the variable main pain site other places than the pelvis the results are unsure due to small numbers. Implications Based on our finding of long pain duration as a negative predictor for pain reduction, we emphasize that early intervention is important. Many of the participants in our RCT reported pelvic surgeries or other treatments prior to referral for PT, and we suggest that referral to a non-invasive intervention such as PT should be considered at an earlier stage. In order to tailor interventions to the individual women's needs, thorough baseline assessments, preferably in a multidisciplinary setting, should be performed.

Group-based multimodal physical therapy in women with chronic pelvic pain: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain in women is a complex condition, and physical therapy is recommended as part of a broader treatment approach. The objective of this study was to compare structured group-based multimodal physical therapy in a hospital setting (intervention group) with primary-care physical therapy (comparator group) for women with chronic pelvic pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women aged 20-65 years with pelvic pain ≥6 months and referred for physical therapy were eligible. The primary outcome measure was change in the mean pelvic pain intensity from baseline to 12 months, measured using the numeric rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were changes in scores of "worst" and "least" pain intensity, health-related quality of life, movement patterns, pain-related fear of movements, anxiety and depression, subjective health complaints, sexual function, incontinence, and obstructed defecation. The differences between the groups regarding change in scores were analyzed using the independent t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome was performed with a linear regression model adjusted for the baseline value. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 62 women included, 26 in the intervention group and 25 in the comparator group were available after 12 months for data collection and analysis. The difference between the groups for change in the mean pain intensity score was -1.2 (95% CI -2.3 to -0.2; P = .027), favoring the intervention group. The intervention group showed greater improvements in respiratory patterns (mean difference 0.9; 95% CI 0.2-1.6; P = .015) and pain-related fear of movements (mean difference 2.9; 95% CI -5.5 to -0.3; P = .032), and no significant differences were observed between the groups for the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although the reduction in the mean pelvic pain intensity with group-based multimodal physical therapy was significantly more than with primary-care physical therapy, the difference in the change between the groups was less than expected and the clinical relevance is uncertain.

The Labour Progression Study (LaPS): Duration of labour following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph - A cluster randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate labour duration in different phases of labour when adhering to Zhang's guideline for labour progression compared with the WHO partograph. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Fourteen Norwegian birth care units, each with more than 500 deliveries per year constituted the clusters. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7277 nulliparous women with singleton foetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labour at term were included. INTERVENTION: Seven clusters were randomised to the intervention group that adhered to Zhang's guideline (n = 3972) and seven to the control group that adhered to the WHO partograph (n = 3305) for labour progression. MEASUREMENTS: The duration of labour from the first registration of cervical dilatation (≥ 4 cm) to the delivery of the baby and the duration of the first and second stages of labour; the time-to-event analysis was used to compare the duration of labour between the two groups after adjusting for baseline covariates. FINDINGS: The adjusted median duration of labour was 7.0 h in the Zhang group, compared with 6.2 h in the WHO group; the median difference was 0.84 h with 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.2-1.5). The adjusted median duration of the first stage was 5.6 h in the Zhang group compared with 4.9 h in the WHO group; the median difference was 0.66 h with 95% CI (0.1-1.2). The corresponding adjusted median duration of the second stage was 88 and 77 min; the median difference was 0.18 h with 95% CI (0.1-0.3). KEY CONCLUSIONS: The women who adhered to Zhang's guideline had longer overall duration and duration of the first and second stages of labour than women who adhered to the WHO partograph. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Understanding the variations in the duration of labour is of great importance, and the results offer useful insights into the different labour progression guidelines, which can inform clinical practice.